1-Schools of Thought in Second Language Learning.ppt
sudhakarvenueflu
72 views
13 slides
Jul 06, 2024
Slide 1 of 13
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
About This Presentation
second language learning
Size: 1.6 MB
Language: en
Added: Jul 06, 2024
Slides: 13 pages
Slide Content
Schools of Thought in
Second Language Learning
(1940’s -2000’s)
Source: Brown, D. Principles of Language
Learning and Teaching. (p.p.9-15)
Trends in Linguistics and
Psychology
Psychology
1940’s-1950’s:
Behaviorism/
Neobehaviorism
-1960’s:
Cognitive Psychology
Linguistics
1940’s-1950’s:
Structural Linguistics
-1960’s:
Transformational-
Generative School
1940’s-1950’s
Behaviorism
-It focused onlyon
publicly observable
behaviors
Structural Linguistics
-Onlyobservable
linguistic behaviors
can be studied.
Language could be
dismantled into small
pieces or units,
described
scientifically,
contrasted, then
added up again to
form the whole.
Cont’d
Behaviorism
-Notions such as
intuition, memory,
thinking, or any
mental processes
were ignored.
Structural Linguistics
-Notions such as
meaning or
thought were
completely
ignored.
Cont’d
Behaviorism
-Learning a behavior:
through conditioning
‘organisms’to
respond in desired
ways to stimuli --}
Practice/ drilling is
important.
Structural Ling.
-Learning language:
conditioning learners to
make the right
connectionbetween
stimuli and the
desired responses --}
Drilling in the language
classroom was a
dominant method.
Cont’d
Behaviorism
-Reinforcement
(Positive or
negative) plays an
important role in
learning.
Structural Ling.
-Positive/ negative
reinforcement play
a significant role in
language learning.
The 1960’s -1980’s
Cognitive Psychology
-Meaning,
understanding, and
knowing are
important
psychological data.
Transformational-
Generative Linguistics
-They broke away from
the structuralists’
insistence on only
studying observable
language
(performance)
Cont’d
Cognitive Psychology
-Cognitivists sought to
discover underlying
motivation and
deeper structures of
human behavior.
Transformational-
Generative Linguistics
-Linguistics goes beyond
mere description of
the surface structure
of language.
Cont’d
Cog. Psych.
-Instead of focusing on
the mechanical
stimulus-response
connections,
cognitivists tried to
focus on
psychological
principles of
organization and
functioning.
T-G Linguistics
-Studying competence
reveals the hidden level
of meaningand thought
(deep structure) that
generates the observable
performance.
-learning language:
language is species-
specific; it is innate:
human beings are born
with the ability to learn
language.
The 1980’s –2000’s
Constructivism
It involves the integration of linguistic,
psychological, and sociological paradigms.
The active role of the learner is
emphasized.
A. Cognitive constructivism: emphasizes the
role of the learner in constructing his/her
own representation of reality:
Constructivism
-Learners must transform complex
information to make it their own.
A more active role for students in their
learning.
Piaget argues that, “learning is a
developmental process that involves
change, self-generation, and construction,
each building on prior experiences.”(in
Kaufman, 2004).
Constructivism
B. Social Constructivism:emphasizes the
importance ofsocial interactionand
cooperative learningin constructing
cognitive and emotional images of reality.
Language learning is a result of thinking
and meaning-making that is “socially
constructed and emerges out of
[learners’] social interactions with the
environment.”(Brown, p. 13)
What is the Best Theory?
No single theory is right or wrong all the
way!
“Some truth can be found in every critical
approach to the study of reality.”(Brown,
p. 14)