1.Update on ACL injuries and management NOOR AZMI MN (2).pptx
AimanArifin2
96 views
42 slides
Jun 10, 2024
Slide 1 of 42
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
About This Presentation
ACL injury update
Size: 17.03 MB
Language: en
Added: Jun 10, 2024
Slides: 42 pages
Slide Content
Updates on ACL injuries and management Presented by Dr Noor Azmi Bin Mohamad Nor Orthopaedic Department Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II
KNEE ANTERIOR VIEW
Anatomy of ACL 25-41mm in length (30mm) 7-12mm in diameter (10mm) ACL has 2 bundles 1. Anteromedial (AM) bundle Taut in flexion, anterior restrain 2. Posterolateral (PL) bundle Taut in extension, rotatory restrain Both are parallel in extension and crosses in flexion
Primary restraint of : Anterior tibia translation Tibia internal rotation 2. Secondary restraints of: Varus Valgus 3. Proprioception Function of ACL
Incidence of ACL Injury Most common among knee injuries Reported 1 in 3500 people and about 400,000 ACL reconstructions done every year in US Female to male ratio 4.5: 1 W eaker hamstrings (more quadriceps dominant) in preventing anterior tibial translation Landing biomechanics- increased valgus angulation and extension of the knee Hormone- Estrogen effects on the strength and flexibility of tissues
ACL injuries can associated with other structure damage: Meniscus (50-75%) Articular cartilage (84-98%) Other ligaments(PCL, PLC and MCL) Secondary damage may occur in patients who have repeated episodes of instability due to ACL injury ACL INJURIES
Mechanism of ACL injury
Non contact pivoting injury - 70%
Hyperextension & awkward landing
Direct contact / collision
Evaluation of ACL injuries History/chief complaints H earing and feeling a sudden “ pop” sound De ep knee pain Immediate swelling due to haemarthrosis (70%) K nee giving way Recurrent swelling R educed knee range of movement, sometimes associated with locking because of meniscal injury or ACL stump
Physical examination Inspection: Q uadriceps avoidance gait (no active knee extension) Varus k nee malalignment - increases the risk of ACL re-rupture and may warrant a concomitant procedure (knee realignment osteotomy) when performing ACL reconstruction 2. Palpation: S w elling / effusion J oint line tenderness with an associated meniscal injury Any bony tenderness indicating associated cartilage injury 3. Movement: Range of motion of both knees Knee locking due to associated meniscal injury/ ACL stump Other ligamentous structures should be assessed
Pr ovocative maneuvers for ACL Injury A nterior drawer test Lachman test- most sensitive, 95% sensitivity and 94% specificity P ivot shift test The KT-1000 arthrometer
Anterior Drawer Test (ADT)
Lachman Test
Pivot Shift Test
KT 1000 arthrometer P erformed with the knee in slight flexion and 10-30 degrees of external rotation. It helps assess and quantify anterior laxity
IMAGING
Radiograph Knee AP, lateral, skyline or merchant - To look for associated injuries Arcuate fracture Segond fracture Tibia spine fracture Sulcus terminalis sign
ACL repair Very limited indication (proximal femoral avulsion tear) Not routinely done in our practice because of outcome is not good compared to ACL reconstruction (high risk of re-tear and may not provide same stability as ACL reconstruction ACL reconstruction (Gold standard) - To prevent instability and restore the function of the torn ligament and creating ‘Stable knee’ Long term success rate 82%- 95 % Surgical option of ACL injury
Most of the patient Patient who perform activities requiring an intact ACL – active patients Who need an ACL reconstruction
ACL dependent/non dependent activities
Perioperative swelling, edema, hyperthermia Near normal range of motion Good quadriceps strength suggest that surgery be performed only when involved quadriceps muscle strength is 80% of the uninvolved lower extremity Normal alignment of the lower limb Proper assessment of other ligament Pre- operative requirement for ACL reconstruction
Early vs D elayed ACL reconstruction Early: Less than 3 weeks Delayed: More than 3 weeks Should be performed at least 3 weeks after injury in order to avoid arthrofibrosis However, if surgery perform after 12 months after injury may lead to further knee damage including meniscal tears, osteochondral defects, and ligament tears (secondary damage) Why?? - chronic rotational and translation instability due to torn ACL Ideal time for ACL reconstruction
Autograft (patient’s own tissue) Hamstring Bone patella tendon bone (BPTB) Quadriceps tendon Allograft (Donor) Achilles tendon (commonly used) BPTB & quadriceps tendon Synthetic graft - Artificial material replace the tendon Polyethylene, polyester For augmentation Option of graft for ACL reconstruction
A utograft - Hamstring Hamstring ( gracilis and semitendinosus tendon)
Autograft - BPTB Bone patella tendon-bone (BPTB)
ACLR using Hamstring graft ACLR using BPTB
After fixation of Hamstring graft ACL Reconstruction
X-Ray Post ACL Reconstruction
Trans-tibial vs trans-porta l ACL reconstruction Trans-portal produce an anatomically positioned femoral tunnel because positioning femoral tunnel is independent of the tibia tunnel Evolution of ACL reconstruction
- D ouble-bundle reconstruction is more technically demanding and invasive than single-bundle reconstruction techniques create 2 tunnels in both the femur and tibia to reproduce the bundles of the ACL (anatomic) Long term outcome: No significant difference in: Clinical function Knee stability Failure rate Single bundle vs double bundle ACL reconstruction
Different from double bundle technique by u sing a single femoral tunnel and 2 tibial tunnels Developed to reduce the complication that occur in double bundle ACL reconstruction – posterior wall blow out, arthrofibrosis post surgery Also no significant difference compared to standard ACL reconstruction (single bundle) Hybrid ACL reconstruction
- 'all-inside' technique uses the semitendinosus alone and spares the gracilis , shorter graft bone preserving nature, reduced postoperative pain, and smaller skin incision Similar overall result compared to standard ACL reconstruction Standard vs ‘ all inside’ ACL reconstruction