27. COGENERATION.ppt

699 views 29 slides Oct 30, 2022
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 29
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29

About This Presentation

Cogeneration is a system that produces heat and electricity simultaneously in a single plant, powered by just one primary energy source, thereby guaranteeing a better energy yield than would be possible to achieve from two separate production sources.


Slide Content

COGENERATION

Cogenerationisthesimultaneousproductionofpowerandheat,withaview
tothepracticalapplicationofbothproducts.
•A way of local energy production
• Heat is main product, electricity by-product
• Uses heat that is lost otherwise
• Way to use energy more efficiently
• Different area’s of application
• Different technologies
COGENERATION

ADVANTAGE OF COGEN POWER
Most techno-commercial viable projects with short pay back
Cost of power production is very cheap compare to that of purchase power
Dependability and reliability with quality of power
Quick return on investments
Restore ecological imbalance
Ability to use biomass and organic matters like wood, grass, agro wastes and
also MSW
Availability of power between November to May when hydelpower
availability less
Provides economical and timely solution of power problems

Generation of multiple forms of energy in one system: heat and power
Defined by its “prime movers”
•Reciprocating engines
•Combustion or gas turbines
•Steam turbines
•Microturbines
•Fuel cells
•Steam turbine
•Gas turbine
•Reciprocating engine
•Other classifications
-Topping cycle
-Bottoming cycle
COGENERATION SYSTEM

BENEFITS OF COGENERATION
•Improve energy efficiency
•Reduce use of fossil fuel and reduce emission of CO
2
•Increased efficiency of energy conversion and use
•Reduce cost of energy
•If heat fits demand, cheapest way of electricity
production
•Improve security of supply
•Use of organic waste as fuel
•Position on energy market
•Opportunity to decentralize the electricity generation
•Conserve natural resources
•Support grid infrastructure
–Fewer T&D constraints
–Defer costly grid upgrades
–Price stability

6
EFFICIENCY ADVANTAGE OF CHP

Widely used in CHP applications
Oldest prime mover technology
Capacities: 50 kW to hundreds of MWs
Thermodynamic cycle is the “Rankin cycle” that uses
a boiler
Most common types
•Back pressure steam turbine
•Extraction condensing steam turbine
STEAM TURBINE COGENERATION SYSTEM

•Steamexitstheturbineatahigherpressureorequaltotheatmospheric
pressure
•After the steam exits the turbine, it is fed to the load where it releases heat
and is condensed. The condensate then returns to the system
BACK PRESSURE STEAM TURBINE COGENERATION SYSTEM
Fuel
BACK PRESSURE STEAM TURBINE
Advantages
•Simple configuration
•Low capital cost
•Low need of cooling water
•High total efficiency
Disadvantages
•Larger steam turbine
•Electrical load and output can not be
matched
Boiler
Turbine
Process
HP Steam
Condensate LP
Steam

•The steam for the thermal load is
obtained through extraction from one or
more intermediate stages at appropriate
pressure and temperature
•Remaining steam is exhausted to the
pressure of the condenser
•Relatively high capital cost, lower
total efficiency
•Control of electrical power
independent of thermal load
EXTRACTION CONDENSING STEAM TURBINE
COGENERATION SYSTEM
Boiler
Turbine
Process
HP Steam
LP Steam
Condensate
Condenser
Fuel
EXTRACTION CONDENSING STEAM
TURBINE

•Operateonthermodynamic“Braytoncycle”
•Atmosphericaircompressed,heated,expanded
•Excesspowerusedtoproducepower
•Naturalgasismostcommonfuel
•1MWto100MWrange
•Rapiddevelopmentsinrecentyears
•Twotypes:openandclosedcycle
GAS TURBINE COGENERATION SYSTEM

•Open Brayton cycle: atmospheric air at increased pressure
to combustor
OPEN CYCLE GAS TURBINE COGENERATION SYSTEM
Air
G
Compressor
Turbine
HRSG
Combustor
Fuel
Generator
Exhaust
Gases
Condensate
from Process
Steam to
Process•Old/small units: 15:1
New/large units: 30:1
•Exhaust gas at 450-600
o
C
•High pressure steam
produced: can drive steam
turbine
OPEN CYCLE GAS TURBINE
COGENERATION SYTEM

•Working fluid circulates in a closed
circuit and does not cause corrosion
or erosion
•Any fuel, nuclear or solar energy can
be used
CLOSED CYCLE GAS TURBINE COGENERATION SYSTEM
Heat Source
G
Compressor
Turbine
Generator
Condensate
from Process
Steam to
Process
Heat Exchanger
CLOSED CYCLE GAS TURBINE
COGENERATION SYSTEM

•Used as direct mechanical drives
•Many advantages: operation, efficiency, fuel costs
•Used as direct mechanical drives
•Four sources of usable waste heat
RECIPROCATING ENGINE COGENERATION SYSTEMS
RECIPROCATING ENGINE COGENERATION SYSTEM

14
•Supplied fuel first produces power followed by thermal energy
•Thermal energy is a by product used for process heat or other
•Most popular method of cogeneration
TOPPING CYCLE COGENERATION SYSTEM

15
•Primaryfuelproduceshightemperaturethermalenergy
•Rejectedheatisusedtogeneratepower
•Suitableformanufacturingprocesses
BOTTOMING CYCLE COGENERATION SYSTEMS

ASSESSMENT OF COGENERATION SYSTEMS
•Overall plant heat rate (kCal/kWh)
Ms= Mass Flow Rate of Steam (kg/hr)
hs= Enthalpy of Steam (kCal/kg)
hw= Enthalpy of Feed Water (kCal/kg)
•Overall plant fuel rate (kg/kWh)
Performanceterms and definitions)(
)(
kWOutputPower
hwhsxMs  )(
)/(*
kWOutputPower
hrkgnConsumptioFuel

17
•Steam turbine efficiency (%)
Steam turbine performance
Gas turbine performance
•Overall gas turbine efficiency (%) (turbine compressor)100
)/(
)/(
x
kgkCalTurbinetheacrossdropEnthalpyIsentropic
kgkCalTurbinetheacrossDropEnthalpyActual 100
)/()/(
860)(
x
kgkCalFuelofGCVxhrkgTurbineGasforInputFuel
xkWOutputPower
ASSESSMENT OF COGENERATION SYSTEMS

18
•Heat recovery steam generator efficiency (%)
Ms= Steam Generated (kg/hr)
hs= Enthalpy of Steam (kCal/kg)
hw= Enthalpy of Feed Water (kCal/kg)
Mf= Mass flow of Flue Gas (kg/hr)
t-in= Inlet Temperature of Flue Gas (
0
C)
t-out= Outlet Temperature of Flue Gas (
0
C)
Maux= Auxiliary Fuel Consumption (kg/hr)
Heat Recovery Steam Generator (HRSG) Performance100
)]/([)]([
)(
x
kgkCalFuelofGCVxMttCpxM
hhxM
auxoutinf
wss


ASSESSMENT OF COGENERATION SYSTEMS

19
ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITIES
•Keep condenser vacuum at optimum value
•Keep steam temperature and pressure at optimum value
•Avoid part load operation and starting and stopping
Steam Turbine Cogeneration System

20
Gas Turbine Cogeneration System
•Gas temperature and pressure
•Part load operation and starting & stopping
•Temperature of hot gas and exhaust gas
•Mass flow through gas turbine
•Air pressure
ENERGY EFFICIENCY OPPORTUNITIES

21
• Depends very much on tariff system
• Heat-avoided cost of separate heat production
Electricity
•Less purchase (kWh)
•Sale of surplus electricity
•Peak shaving (kWe)
• Carbon credits (future)
ECONOMIC VALUE OF COGENERATION

22
COGENERATION IN SUGAR MILLS

BOILER
ALTERNATORTURBINE
To process
To process
Fuel
Air
TO
POWER
SUPPLY
CONDENSER
TO
COOLING
TOWER
COGENERATION PLANT LAYOUT
Feed water
PRDS

KCP Boiler
70 TPH, 43.4ata
& 400ºC
TBW Boiler
70 TPH, 67ata &
485ºC
COMPARISON
Prevailing System Proposed System
Multi fuel Boiler
105ata, 525º C, 88%
GEC Turbine
SIEMENS Turbine
C
C
11 KV BUS
C
C
GEC Turbine
SIEMENS Turbine

Actual Thermal Efficiency of existing power plant on date
Heat value of KPC boiler ≈ 767 Kcal/kg (from steam table)
(at 43.4 ata and 400ºC)
Then net heat value of KPC boiler ≈ 767 –105 ≈ 662 Kcal/kg.
Thermal efficiency of KPC boiler = η
th= (Net heat value * Total Steam generation) / (CV of the bagasse * total bagasse consumption)
η
th = (662 * 122759) / (2277 * 61672)
= 57.99% ≈ 58% ( against 69% of design)
Heat value of TBW boiler = 807.7 Kcal/kg (From steam table) (at 67 ata and 485ºC)
Then net heat value of TBW boiler ≈ 807.7 –105 ≈ 702.7 Kcal/kg
GCV of coal = (CV of coal * total coal consumption) / Total fuel consumption
= (5500 * 4622) / 56213 = 452.22 Kcal/kg
GCV of Bagasse = (CV of bagasse * total bagasse consumption) / Total fuel consumption
= (2277 * 51591) / 56213 = 2089.77 Kcal/kg
Then net GCV = 452.22 + 2089.77 = 2542 Kcal/kg

Then net heat gain = heat gain * steam required for cane * efficiency of Topping TG set
= 13.8 * 125*10
3
* 0.9
= 1552.5 Kcal/kg
Total power generation = 1552.5/860 = 1.8 MW
Transfer rate = 1800 * 24 * 330 * 1.96 = 2.79 crore
Thermal efficiency of TBW boiler = ηth = (Net heat value * Total Steam generation) /
(Net GCV * total fuel consumption)
= (702.7 * 129399) * 100 / (2542 * 56213)
ηth = 63% (against 71.75% of design)
Average thermal efficiency of KPC & TBW boiler = (58+63) / 2 = 60.5%
Expected direct efficiency of multifuel boiler = 84%
Then fuel saving = 84 –60.5 = 23.5%
Cost of fuel saving = Actual cane crushed * % of fuel caned * % fuel save
for 02-03 = 729598 * 0.3 * 0.235
= Rs. 51436.65
Then total saving of bagasse = 51437 * 500
= Rs. 2,57,815
= 2.57 crore

Net gain in power = 2.79 crore
Net gain in fuel save = 2.57 crore
Then total gain = 2.79+2.57 = 5.36 crore
Heat value of AFBC boiler = 821.5 Kcal/kg (from steam table)
(at 515º C and 105 kg/cm
2
)
Then net heat gain = 821.5 –807.7
= 13.8 Kcal/kg
From data
Budgeted crane crushed/year = 775000 M.T
Actual crane crushed/year = 72598.401 M.T
No. of crop days = 170 days
% Steam required for crane = 48%
% of bagasse in cane = 30%
Then steam required for cane/hr. = (budgeted cane crushed * %steam reqd. for cane) /
(No. of days * 24)
= (775000 * 0.48) / (170*24)
= 91.176 tph
≈ 100 tph
For maximum efficiency
steam required for cane/hr = 100/0.80 = 125 tph

STEPS FOR SAVINGS
Savingofbagassebyadoptinghightechnologyhighpressureboilers
Reductionofmoistureinbagasse50to45%byimprovingmillingtechnique
Reductioninprocesssteamconsumptionsinevaporatorandprimemovers
BLTFFevaporators
Reductioninlivesteamconsumptionbyusingmultistagereactionturbines
ReductioninoverconsumptionsofpowerTCHusingnewtechniqueof
variabledrivesandhighefficientauxiliaries
Improvecrushingratebyhavingqualitypower

29