Acces to Information - Information Seeking Models & Theories.pdf

00057065 14 views 48 slides May 08, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 48
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48

About This Presentation

Presentation on Access to Information - Information Seeking Models & Theories


Slide Content

LIS 60001 – Access to
Information
Information Seeking Models
& Theories

This Week’s
Readings

INFORMATION SEEKING
“…a conscious effort to acquire
information in response to a need
or gap in your knowledge.”
Case, Looking for Information
(2007), 5.

«
1.T.-
r
.
t V.I
U.I
DoyouhaveFhzCompietc
Infidel'sGuidet$RadicalIslam'?”

Information
Behavior (IB)

INFORMATION BEHAVIOR (IB)
“…encompasses information
seeking as well as the totality of
other unintentional or passive
behaviors (such as glimpsing or
encountering information), as well
as purposive behaviors that do not
involve seeking, such as avoiding
information.”
Case, Looking for Information
(2007), 5

IB RELATED CONCEPTS
REDUCING UNCERTAINTY
Problem Solving
Identifying issues
Setting goals
Designing suitable courses of action
Decision Making
Evaluating
Choosing among alternatives

IB RELATED CONCEPTS
Browsing
Informal, unplanned
Aimless vs. goal-related
Scanning
Serendipity

zoomiibooksiflj1? rra.flo
G
Beststlers
CaGf»ff>n«
\Yl5ilLl5l|0)
Lff
'
jM-ieah.LIJ^
Bestsellers

G
t?«Knm
w
*
fsO'
i1
1
E
3
&
*r
<CL.
< \f\am
nh
O
'
3
1
3"
o
I
n
:|!3f
jhji
“?
-
5
«
^

11=
\zlii
rt2
-.
Sr
CD
9
r
r
jr«
O
£
£
_
in
ra
I
i/l3n.
*
-
3.r
;a %
3
I
3
2?- Lrt
CD
*
?SSg
FIsi>r
Lm
II
i
-3-
>
*&>
>
n.T*?‘1
III
"O >
corooo
roro-fio
-
*
?-= “
3
CD r&
“-
T-—-
v-
'L'
b=-= O
Mf-a
o Qim-
-
jro
3

CLSI 15
OCO roi=
7
*
V= Qi
CO
7-
J
roroLn
CJIrococo
r--'iici
ro-P-0=
1
w
coWco
1
=
1CO
1
=
1
1
=
1CO
CO1
=
1
*
I o <
3
v-
'
crEV
%.jT. CD
3 CLI
"
CD
=E
CD CD
L--
y.
r-Qi
QI
-
in
T
1
34=-- 15
in o CD
CL <Qi CL f i priiii!
ijrfi
O
X
w -C
0o cr
o CO o
3CD
=
i x-
4r-o
*
Qi 001
=
1
CD
3
s
3?
03O mUD
=E
!
CD IDn o "D
li
ID o3033
"3
4
c 3
<
CD LA
CD
I!
!!!S
:
ni a
'
5
aCL
CDQj
-
CO>
CD 3 UD
ij
NJ QiCL
CD Qi
lJc nc
* CD
a
Qi LU Q
|Qi
n
rocoo=
iroco roro
I
=
ICOCOG=

=
iI
=
Ico
cocoi__
jco;=
«rocococorxco
=
iroro
-oI=
II
=
Irocoo
4=-ro;
'=
» roroi
=
3
rr CO
1
=
1 COIJ=
Iro*
4,
ro: oo
--
jro:
-
coI
=
Iro
-
'
0=
1CJI
jp
Ln rooro o
NJ roro; roro
4
*
r
°
=CJI^
ro
PcoCO
'
0=
1roco
-
j^
rorJ:
4=-CJI
oroco;
ro
8l
*
J
&J
c
^
CJI:
I
=
Io CJI
IJ=
I!=?coro
coco1.--J
o
J
cn ;
:o
fJD
ro: ro n
coro: m ro
LO oU='
o
L-n
Om;;ro
'
COCOTO"--JCOcn
COcooop;=:
!
^
'
rr,
T
^
;i:o:-:
J
'
??
1
^
-COO'QCOCO
_1
=
1 r-
o,==
CDm
=
1,:
,co,
co
^
cococo =
1cnz_
CD_
rov
1
—lTl'=
>o
v-
^
v-
OD =
co
00
_
L_
3
"
CO3
(-Lj
CL
'rP'i—LT
'
n_ITTLLLLQ
|
5
'iD
'
m
^
-
D
^
^coco^
^
Qjq CO;r-;r-
QiQI COLi
1
Ca-=
5a,-
S-S-=
5
CJI ft
CJIft
CO CO
J.
!H»D
s?»J
-
ft
hi1
?
00
00
i
=
l
CO
O
V-ioo LO
o o
V
1
=
1
V
W
3
t
T
CD3
QICD
r^
aico
CL
n3- CD
CO
e
o CLz.
r-
j
Qi QI QI-
!
CO
E:
-
CD
'
Hi
Clw:-:
3
3 QiCL
CD CDun
'-
z
c:
\IUf-
fitm
il
*
S
Qi
CD» 5
7^-
p
CD
QiO
ft
_
Q
&CDT
5
CD Qi
*
5 in i«-7
si75
“;
^
c
k
77
r.

|II
z
l
*
LL

wiZ.
'
Hr.
1
ClUTflMEP
#
^
A
*
^
_
La4.iju
(
ULIUU
^
x:}I
u u m iJik
5
I
W
'
--
r
*
*
"
k
Ec-^-“#
9vL
«<
>
"
"
>K_
^
iW|
-
^—
I3”-
fli||
!
S
t
1
BrowsePictur
*
*m~iI<LMH'TW|‘MriirIUir
>HfifiJ -H-
U,-.
J,

IB RELATED CONCEPTS
Relevance
Requires context
‘Aboutness’ (i.e., on the topic)
vs. non-topicality
Pertinent – connected to a need
Salience
Unexpected, notable, prominent
Selective exposure

IB RELATED CONCEPTS
Avoiding information
Selective exposure (filtering)
Rejection of ideas
Reluctance to be distracted
Unused information

IB RELATED CONCEPTS
Information poverty
Knowledge gaps
Barriers to knowledge
•Cultural patterns
•Lack of processing skills (e.g.,
reading, language, hearing, sight)

IB RELATED CONCEPTS
Omission
Error
Queuing
Filtering
Approximation
Multiple
Channels
Escaping
“We can seek knowledge in
order to reduce anxiety and
we can avoid knowing in
order to reduce anxiety.”
Maslow
Information overload and anxiety
helka
Searchresultstor

information?
"
print
P

EXERCISE:
Common
Information
Behaviors

COMMON INFORMATION
BEHAVIORS
Buying a product
Visiting a library
Locating a law
Betting on a race horse
“I want to know more about
cancer…”
Needs? Actions? Search strategies?
Challenges and barriers? Sources?

COMMON INFORMATION
BEHAVIORS
Buying a product

COMMON INFORMATION
BEHAVIORS
Visiting a library

COMMON INFORMATION
BEHAVIORS
Locating a law

COMMON INFORMATION
BEHAVIORS
Betting on a race horse

COMMON INFORMATION
BEHAVIORS
“I want to know more
about cancer…”
FrequencyofCancer
2005DistributionofPrimaryDiagnosis
STOMACH
COLON
RECTUM
LUNG
11.5%
PANCREAS
3.1%
GYN.NOS
BLADOER
42%
LYMPHOMA
PROSTATE
16.9%
2.5%
ALLOTHER
12.1%
BREAST
242%

Information
Seeking Models
\ \
\\\ \
/'
\\\ /
'
V
'/'
1\
\\
V
\t
'-^
\
\
\
\
/
/\\

INFORMATION SEEKING MODELS

Describe and (attempt to) explain
circumstances that predict
actions by people seeking to find
information

INFORMATION SEEKING MODELS

Flow-charts and diagrams
Suggest sequences of events
Specific, often defined in relation
to theories
See Handout

INFORMATION SEEKING
MODELS
Wilson (2 models) (1981, 1999)
Krieklas (1983)
Leckie, Pettigrew and Sylvain
(1996)
Bystrom and Jarvelin
Savolaienen (1995)
Johnson (1997)

Wilson’s (1981) Model
lufons
^
ni
^
nUsfif
I
Snli
^-fathwiivr
:
iNciaT
/
v
InComiadrm
^
L'kI;ILJ;
BduVicnrInranmUnUse >
InfonnaikmI
^
change
/\
z
^
fin
Inlbn
^
lionSystems
Demanfls.efiLotlicr
int
'
cnmat:-nnSourvcH
V
31
t)LhcrlhL
^
p3i;
Sue F-ailui

C
v/
]rc(orma?ionTransPer

Information
gathering
Information giving
Need-creating
event/environment
Needs
(deferred)
Needs
(immediate)
Source preference
Internal External
Memory
Direct
(structured)
observations
Direct
(interper-
sonal)
Contact
Recorded
(literature)Personal
files
Krikelas Model (everyday behavior)
I
i
]r
1 t1
1

Leckie, Pettigrew & Sylvain Model
Workroles
;4i
Tasks
mum
CharacteristicsofInformationHeeds
Awareness
Sources
of
34of
5
informationneeds
information
a
f
^
Outcomes
Feedback

Bystrom & Jarvelin Model
Situational
factors
TaskCategory
Actor
'
sAmbition,
EducationandExperience
Categoryof
InformationNeeded
InformationChannels
andSourcesConsidered
1
EvaluationofSources
UsedChannelsUsed ReasonsforUse
FinalEvaluation

Johnson Model
Information-
seekingactions
Information-
carrierfactors
Health-related
factors
Demographics
Direct
experience
Action
Salience
Utility

Information
Seeking
Theories

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
George Zipf – Principle of
Least Effort (1949)
Each individual will adopt a
course of action that will
involve the expenditure of the
probable least average of his
work

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Principle of Least Effort
Language usage
E.g., word distributions
1930 census – city
populations
‘Harmonic distributions’

A plot of word frequency
in Wikipedia (November
27, 2006). x is rank of a
word in the frequency
table; y is the total
number of the word’s
occurrences. Most
popular words are “the”,
“of” and “and”, as
expected.

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Principle of Least Effort
80/20 or 70/30 rule
Library collections
Internet websites
Dorsch and Pifalo study
(1997) – medical journal circ.

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Principle of Least Effort
Professional asks nearest
coworker
Artists use nearest tools
Consulting older (closer) resource
instead of a more current one

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Principle of Least Effort
Using interpersonal sources vs.
authoritative sources
Dervin: relying on close friends
and relatives
Other examples?

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Principle of Least Effort
Cost-benefit paradigm - the
trade-off between the effort
required to employ a strategy
and the quality of the resulting
action

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Cost-Benefit Paradigm Applied to IB
Seekers will minimize the effort
required to obtain information,
even if it means accepting a
lower quality or quantity of
information.
Case, Looking for Information (2007),
154.

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Uses and Gratification (Mass
Media)
Audience plays an active role
(not passive) in selecting
sources
The person uses the medium,
not the other way around

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Uses and Gratification (Mass
Media)
Media are only a portion of a
range of options for fulfilling
needs
Use can be studied by asking
people directly

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Uses and Gratification in LIS
Chatman – studied working-class
poor (janitors)
How the poor define/deal with
problems
Reasons for non-active
information seeking

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Play Theory and Entertainment
Theory
Are information and
entertainment two different
things?

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Play Theory and Entertainment
Theory
Stephenson (1967) – humans
manipulate their intake of
entertainment and information
to serve their emotional needs
Pleasure principle

INFORMATION SEEKING
THEORIES
Play Theory and Entertainment
Theory
Humans tend to:
Seek pleasure and avoid pain
Mix work with play
E.g., reading the news

See You Next Week!