Additional analysis (socio-economic baseline).pdf

rhabonaran 3 views 13 slides Mar 10, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 13
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13

About This Presentation

Socio-economic analysis


Slide Content

Additional Socio-Economic Baseline Analysis

Cocoa commodity (On-farm/Off-farm)
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 2
Cocoa (Data) On-farm Off-farm Total
Total production (Kg) 14,602 2,152 1,6754
Total area (Ha) 114 111 225
Average production (Kg/Ha) 367 303.8 351.4
Average production (Kg/trees) 0.91 0.52 0.82
Cocoa (Data) On-farm Off-farm Total
Total cocoa product trade(Kg) 27,155 3,927 31,082
Total income from cocoa (Rp) 1,061,493,425 101,862,500 1,163,355,925
Total income from non-cocoa (Rp) 1,272,006,000 345,350,000 1,617,356,000
Percentage of Share income from cocoa 51% 34% 46%

Cofeecommodity (On-farm/Off-farm)
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 3
Coffee(Data) On-farm Off-farm Total
Total production (Kg) 4,625 1,630 6,255
Total area (Ha) 9.7 3.8 13.5
Average production (Kg/Ha) 514 438 497
Average production (Kg/trees) 0.6 0.3 0.5
Coffee (Data) On-farm Off-farm Total
Total coffee product trade(Kg) 3,926 1,380 5,306
Total income from coffee (Rp) 80,030,500 19,885,000 99,915,500
Total income from non-coffee (Rp) 241,950,000 117,500,000 359,450,000
Percentage of Share income from coffee 40% 21% 36%

Share income fromcommoditytrade
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Simalungun
(Cocoa)
Karo
(Cocoa)
North Luwu
(Cocoa)
Ngada
(Coffee)
Share income (District)
On-farm Off-farm
Key Data Element for Indicator Custom 1:
Percent increase of farmer income as a result
of USG assistance
Target: Increase of 15%, by the end of the
project

Formula
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 5
Production Analysis
Total production (Kg) Sum of commodity production
Total area (Ha) Sum of commodity sourcing areas
Average production (Kg/Ha) Total Average
Yield (Kg)/ Number of HH’s area (Ha)
Average production (Kg/trees)
(insufficient data)
Total Average
Yield (Kg)/ Number of HH’s trees
Income Analysis
Total commodity product trade(Kg) Sum of commodity product trade
Total income from commodity trade (Rp)
Sum of income from commodity trade
(Kg*price)
Total income from non-commodity trade (Rp) Sum of farmer’s additional income
Percentage of Share income from commodity trade
Total revenue from commodity trade /
Total income (%)

Comment on the rawdata
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 6
•An outlier was found in data on the number of areas per household and annual yieldper household.
•Missing details about farming activity costs, commodity prices for each type of harvested bean, and
commodity prices during seasonal grand harvest events.
•Insufficient data on cocoa/coffee trees owned per household.

Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 7
Basic Information
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Tertiary educationSenior high schoolJunior high schoolElementary school
Education level
(Coffee)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Tertiary
education
Senior high
school
Junior high
school
Elementary
school
Not apply to
education
Education level
(Cocoa)
Male Female
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Employee Farmer Other
Main source of livelihood
(Coffee)
Male Female
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Hard labor Teacher Entrepreneur Farmer Government
official
Other
Main source of livelihood
(Cocoa)
Male Female

Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 8
Basic Information
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
≤0,2 Ha ≥0,3 Ha 1 Ha
Land size
(Coffee)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Mixed Coffee Other crops
Land use -commodity preference
(Coffee)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Mixed Cocoa Other crops
Land use-commodity preference
(Cocoa)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
≤0,6 ≥ 0,7 Ha 25 Ha
Land size
(Cocoa)
Male Female

Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 9
Power relation (Gender dynamic)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Male & Female Male
(status: single)
Female
(status: single)
Female after
consultation with her
spouse
Decision making on income management
(Coffee)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Male &
Female
Mostly Male Mostly
Female
Male
(status:
single)
Female
(status:
single)
Male after
consultation
with her
spouse
Female after
consultation
with her
spouse
Other
Decision making on income management
(Cocoa)
MaleFemale

Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 10
Power relation (Gender dynamic)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Male &
Female
Mostly male Mostly
female
Male
(status:
single)
Female
(status:
single)
Male after
consultation
with her
spouse
Female after
consultation
with her
spouse
Other
Decision making on agricultural practices
(Cocoa)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Male & Female Male
(status: single)
Male after
consultation with her
spouse
Female
(status: single)
Decision making on agricultural practices
(Coffee)
Male Female

Sex and Age Disaggregated Data (SADD) analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 11
Power relation (Gender dynamic)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
Male & Female Male
(status: single)
Female
(status: single)
Mostly Male Male after
consultation with
her spouse
Female after
consultation with
her spouse
Decision making on commodity trade negotiation
(Coffee)
Male Female
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Male &
Female
Male
(status:
single)
Female
(status:
single)
Mostly maleMostly
female
Male after
consultation
with her
spouse
Female
after
consultation
with her
spouse
Other
Decision making on commodity trade negotiation
(Cocoa)
Male Female

Ecosystem management & governance efficacy analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 12
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Exists & active
Exists but rarely active
Exists but not active
Farmer group
(Cocoa)
On-farm Off-farm
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Exists & active
Exists but rarely active
Exists but not active
Not exists
Farmer group
(Coffee)
On-farmOff-farm
Effectiveness
Effectiveness
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Very useful Useful Less useful
On-farmOff-farm
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Very useful Useful Less useful
On-farm Off-farm

Ecosystem management & governance efficacy analysis
AdditonalSocio-Economic Baseline Analysis 13
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
No
Yes
Platform for government policy aspirations
(cocoa)
On-farm Off-farm
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
No
Yes
Platform for government policy aspirations
(coffee)
On-farm Off-farm
Effectiveness
Effectiveness
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Very effective Effective Rarely effectiveNot effective
On-farm Off-farm
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Very effective Effective Rarely effectiveNot effective
On-farm Off-farm
Tags