An Evaluation of GAVI HSS Project Implementation Using Paris Declaration Principles

Bahan paparan pada Australasian Aid Conference 2016, Canberra

1. AN EVALUATION OF THE GAVI HSS PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION USING PARIS DECLARATION PRINCIPLES Australasian Aid Conference February 10 th – 11th 2016 Australian National University, Canberra Budi Perdana Ministry of Health Republic Indonesia

2. PROPORTION OF FOREIGN FUND IN MOH BUDGET 2012 - 2015 1,88 % 1,54 % 1,8 % 0,8 % 1,46 % 0,03 % 1,71 % 0,02 %

3. GLOBAL ALLIANCE FOR VACCINE AND IMMUNIZATION - HEALTH SYSTEM STRENGTHENING PROJECT Started in 2002 (2002 – 2007 : phase 1)  NVS, ISS, INS 2007  policy from Geneva to support HSS in strengthening immunization HSS proposal approved to be funded for 2 years : 2008 – 2009 (phase 2), total grant : USD 24 M 4 original objectives : community mobilization to support MCH, improve management capacity, partnership with NGO, operational research for critical barriers. Reprogramming 2012  focusing in WHO building blocks of Service Delivery, Information and Health Workforce Central level ( MoH ), 5 Provinces and 39 Districts

4. DISBURSEMENT AND EXPENDITURE Year Disbursement (plan)* Disbursement (actual )** Expenditure *** 2008 7,96 7,69 2009 16,86 0,27 2010 6,69 2011 3 , 2012 3,72 2 , 44 2013 3,72 0, 94 2014 1,67 Total 24,82 15,4 14,76 * : amount of disbursement in the original proposal ** : actual disbursement, from GAVI to MoH *** : actual expenditure from the amount that has been disbursed In Million USD

5. METHOD Case study, qualitative, purposive sampling Data collection: Observation Interview with senior managers from key stakeholders Review project documents Review journals Source triangulation Process evaluation using PD principles and indicators

6. FINDINGS Fund channeling was not clear Grant utilization strategy implemented sub optimally Unpredictable schedule of disbursement Not prioritized by partners

7. RECOMMENDATIONS National Board of Planning , MoF and MoH (internally) are expected to develop mechanism to align direct grants with the national budget planning cycle. To ensure timely disbursement: GAVI must require stronger readiness criteria. Ministry of Health should ensure the fund channeling before sending proposal to donor. Ministry of Health and GAVI should pay close attention to the time synchronization of the GoI schedule and GAVI schedule.

8. Thank you

9. Planning Documents within National Development Planning System National Long Term Plan (RPJP) Medium Term Development Plan (RPJMN) Annual Development Plan (RKP) Ministerial Level Min i sterial Strategic Plan (Renstra) Ministerial Work Plan (Renja) Ministerial Work and Budget Plan (RKA) Sub-national level Similar to national level 9

10. RPJMN is placed strategically in the National Development Planning System Diacu Diperhatikan Diserasikan m elalui MUSRENBANG RKP RPJM Nasional RPJP Nasional Renstra KL Renja - KL RAPBN RKA-KL APBN Rincian APBN Pedoman Dijabarkan Pedoman Pedoman Pedoman Pedoman Diacu Central Government RPJM Daerah RPJP Daerah RKP Daerah Renstra SKPD Renja - SKPD RAPBD RKA - SKPD APBD Rincian APBD Pedoman Pedoman Pedoman Dijabarkan Pedoman Pedoman Diacu Law SPPN (No.25/2004) Sub-National Governmenty Bahan Bahan (diserasikan dlm RAKORPUS & Trilateral Meeting ) Bahan Bahan Law KeuNeg (No.17/2003)