Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) fundamentals

qirexxqrx 4 views 27 slides Oct 17, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 27
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27

About This Presentation

introduction to analytic hierarchy process


Slide Content

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Nimantha Tharuka

Multi Criteria Decision Making Analysis (MCDMA) Involves Individuals subjectively and intuitively considering various factors prior to making a decision.

Multifactor Evaluation Process Factor Importance (Weight) IFS MAS KPMG Salary Career Advancement Location

Evaluation of IFS   Factor Name Factor Weight Factor Evaluation Weighed Evaluation Salary Career Advancement Location Total

Comparison of Results Factor IFS MAS KPMG Salary Career Advancement Location Weighted Evaluation

Founded by Dr. Thomas L. Saaty in 1980 Allows the use of qualitative, as well as quantitative criteria in evaluation Wide range of applications exist: Selecting a car for Purchasing Deciding upon a place to visit for vacation Deciding upon the importance of the factors impact to the global supply chains Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Steps of AHP Step 1 – Construction of the Hierarchy Structure (Goal, Criteria, Sub Criteria, Alternatives) Step 2 – Calculation of Factor Weight 1.Pairwise Comparison Matrix 2.Eigenvalue and Eigenvector 3.Consistency test Consistency Index Consistency ratio Step 3 – Calculation of the Level Weight Step 4 – Calculation of overall Ranking

Hierarchy Tree

Pairwise Comparison Semantic Differential Scale

Rating Scale Intensity of importance Definition 1 Equal importance 3 Weak importance of one over the other 5 Essential or strong importance 7 Demonstrated importance 9 Absolute importance 2, 4, 6, 8 Intermediate values between the two adjacent judgements

Select the Best Transport Mode Select the Best Transport mode Cost Travel Time Convenience & Safety Bus Train Car Goal Criteria Alternatives

Pairwise Comparison Basic Consistency Consider the factors A , B , & C IF, A is important than B, B is important the C, It implies that, A is important then C

Pairwise Comparison Criteria Comparison Cost Travel Time Convenience & Safety Cost 1 5 1/7 Travel Time 1/5 1 1/5 Convenience & Safety 7 5 1 Cost Travel Time Cost Convenience & Safety Travel Time Convenience & Safety

Ranking the Criteria   A = 1.45 14 5.125   Normalized Pairwise Comp. Matrix Normalized Pairwise Comp. Matrix Row Average   X = Priority Vector ( x) Column Sum

Weights of the Criteria Cost Travel Time Convenience & Safety Criteria Weights Select the Best Transport mode Cost Travel Time Convenience & Safety Goal Criteria

Checking for Consistency Consistency Ration (CR) – measure how consistent the judgements have been relative to large samples of purely random judgements AHP evaluation assume that the decision maker is rational. If the CR greater than 0.1 the judgements are untrustworthy because they are too close for comfort to randomness and the exercise is valueless or must be repeated

    The next stage is to calculate λ , Consistency Index (CI) and the Consistency Ration (CR). Consider [AX= λX] where X is the Eigenvector.         A X = = AX X λ   λ =  

RI = 0.58    

Ranking Alternatives Cost Bus Train Car Bus 1 1/3 5 Train 3 1 7 Car 1/5 1/7 1 Travel (T) Bus Train Car Bus 1 3 1/3 Train 1/3 1 1/5 Car 3 5 1 Con. & Safe. Bus Train Car Bus 1 1/3 3 Train 3 1 6 Car 1/5 1/6 1      

1 0.33 5 3 1 7 0.2 0.14 1 4.2 1.47 13 0.24 0.22 0.38 0.71 0.68 0.54 0.05 0.10 0.08 0.28 0.64 0.08 3.050043 3.11072 3.002286   0.05536   0.0954 Cost 1 3 0.33 0.33 1 0.2 3 5 1 4.33 9 1.53 0.23 0.33 0.22 0.08 0.11 0.13 0.69 0.56 0.65 0.26 0.11 0.63 3.028016 3.005352 3.066315   0.033157   0.0571 Travel (T) 1 0.33 3 3 1 6 0.33 0.17 1 4.33 1.5 10 0.23 0.22 0.30 0.69 0.67 0.60 0.08 0.11 0.10 0.25 0.65 0.10 3.017819 3.036285 3.006345   0.018142   0.0312 Con. & Safe. Normalized Row AVG Priority Vector λ Normalized Row AVG Priority Vector λ Normalized Row AVG Priority Vector λ

Select the Best Transport mode Cost () Travel Time () Convenience & Safety () Bus (0.28) Train (0.64) Car (0.08) Goal Criteria Alternatives Bus (0.26) Train (0.11) Car (0.63) Bus (0.25) Train (0.65) Car (0.10)

Identify the Best Transport mode Mode Cost () Travel (T) () Con. & Safe. () Total Bus 0.28 0.26 0.25 Train 0.64 0.11 0.65 Car 0.08 0.63 0.10

Multiple Response IOS IOS IOS IOS IOS IOS Android Android Android Android Android Android 1 2 3 4 5 6 Name

Geometric Mean Method IOS Android Answer =  

Select the Best Transport Mode Select the Best Transport mode Cost Travel Time Convenience & Safety Ticket Price Maintenance Costs Fuel Costs Parking Fees Toll Costs Total Travel Time Waiting Time Time Flexibility Delays Safety Features Traffic Conditions Availability of Routes Luggage Handling Comfort Bus Train Car Goal Criteria Sub Criteria Alternatives

Thank You
Tags