Assessing Current and Potential Approaches in Multiple Myeloma: Updates From Madrid 2024

PeerVoice 24 views 30 slides Jul 24, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 30
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30

About This Presentation

Philippe Moreau, MD, discusses multiple myeloma in this CE activity titled "Assessing Current and Potential Approaches in Multiple Myeloma: Updates From Madrid 2024." For the full presentation, please visit us at www.peervoice.com/XRB870.


Slide Content

PeerVoice

Assessing Current and Potential Approaches in Multiple Myeloma:
Updates From Madrid 2024

Learning Objectives
Evaluate clinical trial data assessing current and investigational treatment
approaches in transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed
multiple myeloma
Recognise the clinical relevance of data evaluating different treatment
sequencing approaches in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple
myeloma

PeerVoice is an EBAC® accredited provider since 2022.

rvoice.com/XRB870

PeerVoice

Part 1 of 2: Selecting Therapeutic Strategies in Transplant-Eligible
and Transplant-Ineligible NDMM

Philippe Moreau, MD
Professor of Hematology
University Hospital Nantes
Nantes, France

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

isclosures

Philippe Moreau, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in
the form of:

Advisory Board for AbbVie Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb Company; Celgene
Corporation; Janssen Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; and Sanofi.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Frontline Therapy Options in NDMM

Yes Eligibility for ASCT No
A First option:

DaraRd [l, A]
DaraVMP [I, A]
VRd [lA]

If first option is not available
VMP [L A]

\ ) Rd [I, A]

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

CASSIOPEIA St +DvsVTd+D

Part 2:
Part 1: Induction/consolidation phase Maintenance phase, , Follow-up phase

Induction idati Maintenance
DARA

Follow-up

Fr
=

=
a
2
=
E

(=

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

CASSIOPEIA Stu

D-VTd =D vs VTd + D (Cont'd)

72-month PFS
'
i

Dara:
median, NR

HR, 0.49; 95% Cl, 0.40-0.59;
P< 0001

O 6 1 18 243036 42 48 546066 72 78 8490

Time Since Randomisation, Months

www.peervoice.com/XRB870

PFS, %

100

#0 D-VTd/Dara:

median, NR
60

VTd/Dara:

median, NR
2 D-VTa/OBS:

median, 72.1 mo
20

VTd/OBS:
median, 32.7 mo

O 6 12 18 243036 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 8490
Time Since Randomisation, Months

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

CASSIOPEIA Study: D-VTd + D vs VTd + D (Cont'd)

ity Rate, %

MRD-Negati

www.peervoice.com/XRB870

Sustained MRD 224 Months
100%
90%
10“: P=.0028
= 10°*: P = 0023
rn 10: P< 0001
50% 408%
50% -
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
D-VTd/ D-VTd/ VTd/ VTd/
Dara OBS Dara OBS

(n=229) (n=229) (n=213) (n = 215)

Copyright © 2010-2024, Peervoice

PeerVoice

PERSEUS TRIAL: D-VRd + D-R vs VRd +R

Median follow-up:
47.5 months

Median time to reach
post-consolidation:
9.7 months

48-month PFS
»o

80
60

40

PFS, %

20

HR, 0.42; 95% Cl, 0.30-0.59;
IP <.0001

0 3 6 9 25 = 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54

o

Months

www.peervoice.com/XRB870

PFS according to MRD status (10-6)

D-VRd: MRD neg

'VRd: MRD neg
MRD pos
VRd: MRD pos

0 3 6 9 1 % 1 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54

Months

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

GMMG-HD7 TRIAL: Isa-RVd vs RVd

GMMG-HD7 Interim Analysis: MRD Negativity by
NGF (10-5) After Intensification (ITT; by response)

Patients with MRD negativity and indicated response status GMMG-HD7 Interim oh MRD
Negativity by NGF (10-5) After
P<.001 misa-RVd mRVd Intensification (Per Protocol)

© 36.4% Patients with MRD negativity after
0 having completed intensification
à 50 43.8%
Lu OR, 198 (95% CI, 139-285)
5» P<.001
re 25% misa-RVd
o 565% MRVd
2VGPR 2CR

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

CARTITUDE-2: Cilta-cel + Lenalidomide Maintenance in

Suboptimal Response to Frontline ASCT

Overall Response Rate MRD negativity (10-5), n/N (%)

rn 94.1(16/17) Overall 12/17 (70.6)
MRD-evaluable patients 12/15 (80.0)
80
Es PFS and OS
€ 100 100
Lao £
E feo u.
20 sg g
Sa co Zo
o av 2
8 5 18-mo PFS rate (95% Cl): 5 40 18-mo OS rate (95% Cl):
52 93.8% (63.2-99.1) 3 93.8% (632-9911)
67 42 1PFS event out of a 20 108 event out of
a 17 patients 17 patients
o o
ERRE RETTET
Months Months

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

IMROZ: Isa-VRd vs VRd

162 PFS events: 84 (31.7%) in Isa-VRd; 78 (43.1%) in VRd 128 OS events: 69 (26.0%) in Isa-VRd; 59 (32.6%) in VRd

— Isa-VRd — VRd + Censor

2

aa 60-moPFSrate:632% à

08 MPFS: NR £

07 3

06 q

05 5

83 6 60-mo PFS rate: 45.2%

02 mPFS: 54.34 mo

O1 {Log-rank P = 0005 (95% Ci, 45207 to NR)

0 HR, 0.776; 99.97% Cl, 0.407-148

O 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72

E
go

© 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72

Time, Months Time, Months
% Patients Isa-VRd(n=265) VRd (n= 181)
CR 747 641
MRD- CR (105 by NGS) 55.5 409

Sustained MRD- for at

least 12 months us us

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

BENEFIT/IFM2020-05: Isa-VRd vs Isa-Rd

MI8 Primary Objective
(MRD at 10°)

N= 270 A =
_ Treatment Phase Until Cycle 18 Ar nn]
Randomisation 1:1 Cycles 1> 18 4-week cycles/18 months Week cycles ‘SPM
Stratified by:
+ Age: <75 and Induction Cy1-12: \ (Induction Cy13-18: Y | (Induction Cy19-PD:) / Primary endpoint:
275 years N IsaVRd IsaVR IsaR os
. i D De 01 072078 5 (oy secondary
Cytogenetic A | | APA || PA 1-1 ‘endpoints:
result by FISH [omo ME 270) 25 me im (70) 25 me. CR rate, MRD- CR
(Modified AAA Nbre) (NGS, 10") rate,
Perrot score) Induction Cyl-12: \) (Induction Cyi3-18:)) (Induction Cy19=PD:) | *VPR rate, PFS. 0S,
+ Centre ’ IsaRd Isar Isar
k Bee ee or 08 vw 02200 | Discontinue based on
0010 eh, Eo] ee PD, unacceptable
00250 ia La PO) 25 me [atop 250m toxicities, patient
Min te Ft + | withdrawal
* 2 ÉS > rs =
MRD (bone In case of 12 months 18 months 24 months Yearly
marrow aspirate) PR or better

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

BENEFIT/IFM2020-05: Isa-VRd vs Isa-Rd (Cont'd)

Primary Endpoint: MRD- Rate at 18 Months — ITT Population

OR (95% Cl):
OR (95% Cl):
3.88 (2.27-6.62) ares De)
P<.0001 <
—— —— OR (95% Cl):
° exc 274 (154-487)
2.97 (16-55) pesao
50 P=.0005 53
R40 oo ——
El
5 30
% 20 M Isa-VRd
Ñ B Isa-Rd
10
o
107 107 103 107
12 mo 18 mo

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Abbreviations and References

Frontline Therapy Options in NDMM

Abbreviation(s): ASCT: autologous stem cell transplantation; DaraRd: daratumumab/lenalidomide/dexamethasone;
DaraVMP: daratumumab/bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone;

DaraVTD: daratumumab/bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone; MM: multiple myeloma; NDMM: newly diagnosed
MM; Rd: lenalidomide/dexamethasone; VCD: bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone;

VMP: bortezomib/melphalan/prednisone; VRd: bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone;

VTD: bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone.

Reference(s): San Miguel J. 29th European Hematology Association Congress (EHA 2024). Session ID HUIH9002.

CASSIOPEIA Study: D-VTd + D vs VTd+D

Abbreviation(s): D/DARA: daratumumab; D-VTd: daratumumab/bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone;
OBS: observation; VTd: bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone.

Reference(s): Moreau P et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $204.

CASSIOPEIA Study: D-VTd + D vs VTd + D (Cont'd)

Abbreviation(s): NR: not reached; PFS: progression-free survival.
Reference(s): Moreau P et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $204.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Abbreviations and References (Cont'd)

CASSIOPEIA Study: D-VTd + D vs VTd + D (Cont'd)

Abbreviation(s): MRO: minimal residual disease.
Reference(s): Moreau P et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $204.

PERSEUS TRIAL: D-VRd + D-R vs VRd +R

Abbreviation(s): D-VRd: daratumumab/bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd).
Reference(s): Sonneveld P et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $201.
Sonneveld P et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:301-313.

GMMG-HD7 TRIAL: Isa-RVd vs RVd

Abbreviation(s): CR: complete response; Isa: isatuximab; ITT: intention-to-treat; NGF: next-generation flow; OR: odds
ratio; RVd: lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone; VGPR: very good partial response.
Reference(s): Raab MS et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $202.

CARTITUDE-2: Cilta-cel + Lenalidomide Maintenance in Suboptimal Response to Frontline ASCT

Abbreviation(s): OS: overall survival; sCR: sCR: stringent CR.
Reference(s): Roeloffzen W et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $205.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Abbreviations and References (Cont'd)

IMROZ: Isa-VRd vs VRd

Reference(s): Facon T et al. EHA 2024; Abstract S100.
Facon T et al. N Engl J Med. 2024; June 3. doil0.1056/NEJMoa2400712. Online ahead of print.

BENEFIT/IFM2020-05: Isa-VRd vs Isa-Rd

Abbreviation(s): AE: adverse event; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridisation; NGS: next-generation sequencing;
PD: progressive disease; SPM: second primary malignancy.

Reference(s): Leleu X et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $203.

Leleu X et al. Nat Med. 2024; 3 June. Published online. https://doi.org/101038/s41591-024-03050-2.

BENEFIT/IFM2020-05: Isa-VRd vs Isa-Rd (Cont'd)

Reference(s): Leleu X et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $203.
Leleu X et al. Nat Med. 2024; 3 June. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1038/541591-024-03050-2.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Part 2 of 2: Selection and Sequencing of Treatment in RRMM

Philippe Moreau, MD
Professor of Hematology
University Hospital Nantes
Nantes, France

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

isclosures

Philippe Moreau, MD, has a financial interest/relationship or affiliation in
the form of:

Advisory Board for AbbVie Inc.; Bristol Myers Squibb Company; Celgene
Corporation; Janssen Inc.; Pfizer Inc.; and Sanofi.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Newer Therapeutic Options in “Triple-Class Exposed” RRMM

BCMA-directed
CAR T-cell

BCMA-directed
CAR T-cell

Ciltacabtagene
autoleucel

Idecabtagene
vicleucel

BCMA

BCMA

22 prior

22 prior

therapies

24 prior 23 prior =
BsAb Talquetamab cos GPresD | ice | therapies | MonumenTAL-1
A 24 prior 23 prior E =
BsAb Teclistamab CD3&BCMA | therapies | therapies» | Males TEC-1
24 prior 23 prior E
BsAb Elranatamab CD8&BCMA | norapiess | therapies | MagnetisMM-3

21 prior

22 prior

| MMY2001/2003/3002

therapies*

CARTITUDE-1/-2/-4

KarMMa
KarMMa-3

ARS —

® Including an immunomodulatory agent, a proteasome inhi

BCMA-directed

® Including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor

r and an anti-CD38 antibody

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

DREAMM-7: BVd vs DVd in RRMM

oa
(031-039)

im
18 months a

Pvolue

os 69%

PFS Probability

Time Since Randomisation, Months

Patients, %

www.peervoice.com/XRB870

90

24.7% vs 9.6%

Cl, 19.4-3 (95% Cl, 6.2-13.9)
2VGPR MRD negativity
38.7% vs 17.1%

(95% CI, 32.5-45.1) (95% CI,12.7-224)

ORR 82.7%
(95% CI, 77.4-87.3) ORR 71.3%
(95% CI, 653-766)

2CR:346% roca 20R:17.1%

(95% Cl, (95% CL,

286-409) 127-224)
2VGPR:
46.2%

(95% Cl, (95% Cl,

595-718) 399-526)

BVd (n = 243) DVd (n = 251)

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

DREAMM-8: BPd vs PVd in RRMM

PFS BPd(n=155)) PVd (n = 147)
M 5 jn Events, n (%) 62 (40) 80 (54)
months =
Median PFS
(65% C1) months | NR(20.6-NR) | 12.7 (91-185)

08 HR (95% Cl); P value | 0:52(0.37-0.73); < .001
tri
06

04

Proportion Alive and
Progression Free

02

m AL LL
0123456789101 1213 14 1516 17 18 19 20 21 2223242526 27 282930 31 3233343536 373839

Time Since Randomisation, Months

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

CARTITUDE-4: Cilta-Cel vs SOC in Functional High-Risk MM

One Prior LOT and Functionally High-Risk MM One Prior LOT and Functionally High-Risk MM

HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.6 0006 100

100 Macon PES: NR (95% CL 18.00-NE) ee

12-mo DOR: 79.5% (95% Cl, $9.0-90.5)

5
§ 12-mo PFS: 77.0% (95% Cl, 603-873) I
a 75 8 75
A ig
Z 50 S< 50
2 av
Er ¿5
ga 25 Lo 25
se 2
Zé o =
© 9 2 15 o
0 3 6 9 2 15 18 21 24
PFS, Months Duration of Response, Months

(95% CI, 4.8-55.1); P <.0001
==
65.0 m Cilta-cel
m SOC
MRD Negative
5
(10-5 threshold) 08

n=40 n=39

Patients With One Prior LOT and Functionally High-Risk MM

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

MagnetisMM-3: Elrana

tamab

Duration of Response

Overall Response

100 24-mo rate for pts with 100
90 2CR (95% Cl): 0 1“, Median OS, 24.6 mo (95% Cl, 13.4-NE)
& 80 87.9% (731-948) x 80
> 70 = 70
2 60 Ea]
E 24-mo rate for pts with É 60
3 OR (95% Cl): 3 50
2 30 | Median OR, mo (osx ci) 969% (544-767) 22
& 20 À— Pts with OR NR (NE-NE) 2 20
10 | — Pts with ¿CR NR (NE-NE) e o
o PFS >
92.30 9 BBB 2124.27 299980" 90 0 3 6 9 1215 18 21242730333639
Months 90 e EN Months
& so
25 24-mo rate for pts with
Eso 2CR (95% CI):
so 90.6% (76.9-96.4)
2 mu
2 30 | Median prs,mo (05% Cl)
À 20 | —Overal172(08-NE)
10 | —Pts with 2CR NR (NE-NE)
o

www.peervoice.com/XRB870

O 3 6 9 12,15 18 212427303336
Months

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

MajesTEC-1: Teclistamab

Best response:

80 ore: m sCR
(104/165) mck
60 m VGPR
x mr
2
a 2VGPR:
3 59.4
&
20

www.peervoice.com/XRB870

PFS

wo —— Overall ——2CR —#-2VGPR
§
se *
es
Bs ©
av
25.
38
ga

Median, mo (95% CI) 30-1

2 D 1) 30-mo PES rate (95% Ci)

Overall 114(8.8-16.4)
2CR NR(269-NE)
2VGPR__ 26.7 (19.4-NE)

30.1% (22.9-37.7)
610% (48.9-711)
48.8% (38.5-58.4)

0 3 6 9 RO = 2124 27 30 33 36 39 42

PFS, Months

Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

-1& 2: Talquetamab
ORR ORR
100 88.6%
100 PR MVGPR MCR msCR (3135)
741
69.5
e 80. (06/143), (107/154) (52/78) ke scr: mscr
£ 60 g 60 51.4% CR
5 BVGPR: | 2 VGPR: E 12 VGPR: 5 sx
3° 59.4 591 Si à mVGPR
> = <a = | = | Pr
o
0.4 mg/kg 0.8 mg/kg Prior TCR o
sc QW SC Q2W Tal + Pom
Efficacy 0.4 mg/kgSC OBmg/kgSC Prior TCR
Outcom aw( 54) ( Efficacy Outcome
mFU, mo 29.8 23.4 20.5 mFU (range), mo 16.8 (1.2-25.1)
mPFS 75 12 77
(95% Cl), mo | (57-94) (64-145) | (arias) | | MPFS (95% Ch, mo NR (12.9-NE)

Copyright © 2010-2024, Peervoice

PeerVoice

Development/Experimental Therapies

Therapy & Rationale Outcomes AE

All-Oral Triplet Iberdomide Ixazomib | ORR 65% (36% VGPR/CR) Well tolerated

and Dexamethasone 12-mo PFS 52% low rate of non-haematologic grade
Phase 2 STUDY 12D 12-DOR 76% 3-4

Age 270 12-mo OS 86%

RRMM; 1 prior line

Cevostamab, a FCRH5xCD3' CORR; partial response [PR] or better as best | Grade 3-4: 62%

bispecific antibody response: of 67% neutropenia anemia,

Phase 1/2 CAMMA 2 STUDY thrombocytopenia, infections
triple-class refractory MM; a prior Serious AEs: 48%

BCMA-targeted ADC or CRS occurred in 71%

CAR T-cell therapy

Anitocabtagene autoleucel (anito- | ORR, 100% ‘CRS: 95% pts

cel) anti-BCMA 2CR rate, 76% ICANS occurred in 7/38 pts (5, Grs2;
CAR T-cell therapy 2VGPR rate, 92% 2, Gr3), with 1 Gr3 case in each DL.
Phase 1STUDY

(Pts with RRMM) 89% were MRD-neg at 10°° All cases of CRS & ICANS resolved
RRMM prior 23 prior lines of therapy with management and without

Kaplan-Meier estimated PFS rates for 6,12, | sequalae.
18 & 24 months were 92%, 76%, 64%, and
56%, respectively. No delayed neurotoxicities

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

How to Select and Sequence Therapies in RRMM

Multiple Myeloma at Second or Higher Relapse

(

Combinations with
cyclophosphamide
that do not have
IMiD, Pl, anti-CD38
mAb (eg, KCd)

Anti-BCMA Strategy

Bispecific
Teclistamab
Elranatamab
Investigational on trial
(eg, ABBV-3838,
REGN5458)

CAR T-cell
Cilta-cel
Ide-cel

Belantamab (if available)

|

Existing Drugs
Elotuzumab
Selinexor
Venetoclax
Bendamustine

VDT-PACE

Novel Agents

Talquetamab
Other investigational
agents:

Iberdomide,

mezigdomide
New bispecifics
(cevostamab)
New CAR T-cells,
new mAbs

New ADCs

Copyright © 2010-2024, Peervoice

PeerVoice

Abbreviations and References

Newer Therapeutic Options in “Triple-Class Exposed” RRMM

Abbreviation(s): ADC: antibody-drug conjugate; BCMA: B-cell maturation antigen; BsAb: bispecific antibody;

CAR: chimeric antigen receptor; CD3: cluster of differentiation 3; GPRCSD: G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5
member D; RRMM: relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Reference(s): Chari A et al. N Engl J Med. 2022:387:2232-2244.

Moreau P et al. N Engl J Med. 2022:387:495-505.

San-Miguel J et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:335-347.

Munshi NC et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:705-716.

Rodriguez-Otero P et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1002-1014.

Lonial $ et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:207-221.

DREAMM-7: BVd vs DVd in RRMM

Abbreviation(s): BVd: belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) plus bortezomib and dexamethasone; CR: complete response;
Dvd: daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone; MRD: minimal residual disease; ORR: overall/objective
response rate; sCR: stringent CR; VGPR: very good partial response (PR).

Reference(s): Mateos MV et al. 29th European Hematology Association Congress (EHA 2024). Abstract $214,

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Abbreviations and References (Cont'd)

DREAMM-8: BPd vs PVd in RRMM

Abbreviation(s): BPd: belamaf plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone; PVd: pomalidomide plus bortezomib and
dexamethasone.
Reference(s): Dimopoulos MA et al. EHA 2024. Abstract LB3440.

CARTITUDE-4: Cilta-Cel vs SOC in Functional High-Risk MM

Abbreviation(s): DOR: duration of response; LOT: lines of treatment;
of care.
Reference(s): Weisel K et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P959.

E: not evaluable; NR: not reached; SOC: standard

MagnetisMM-3: Elranatamab
lohty M et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P932.

Reference(s):

MajesTEC-1: Teclistamab

Abbreviation(s): CR: complete response.
Reference(s): Sidana S et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P879.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice

PeerVoice

Abbreviations and References (Cont'd)

MonumenTAL-1 & 2: Talquetamab

Abbreviation(s): mFU: median follow-up; mPFS: median progression-free survival (PFS); Pom: pomalidomide;
Tal: talquetamab; TCR: T-cell redirecting therapies.

Reference(s): Rasche L et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P915.

Searle E et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P9N.

Development/Experimental Therapies

Abbreviation(s): ADC: antibody-drug conjugate; CRS: cytokine release syndrome; DL: dose level; ICANS: immune
effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome.

Reference(s): Touzeau C et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P9I6.

Kumar S et al. EHA 2024. Abstract S210.

Frigault M et al. EHA 2024. Abstract $207.

How to Select and Sequence Therapies in RRMM

Abbreviation(s): IMiD: immunomodulatory drug; mAb: monoclonal antibody; Pl: proteasome inhibitor;
VDT-PACE: bortezomib, dexamethasone, thalidomide, cisplatin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, etoposide.
Reference(s): Rajkumar SV. 16th Annual Clinical Care Options (CCO)/International Myeloma Foundation (IMF)
Hematology Symposium. 2024 Myeloma Treatment Algorithm.

www.peervoice.com/XRB870 Copyright © 2010-2024, PeerVoice