Assessing Current and Potential Approaches in Multiple Myeloma: Updates From Madrid 2024
PeerVoice
24 views
30 slides
Jul 24, 2024
Slide 1 of 30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
About This Presentation
Philippe Moreau, MD, discusses multiple myeloma in this CE activity titled "Assessing Current and Potential Approaches in Multiple Myeloma: Updates From Madrid 2024." For the full presentation, please visit us at www.peervoice.com/XRB870.
Size: 2.11 MB
Language: en
Added: Jul 24, 2024
Slides: 30 pages
Slide Content
PeerVoice
Assessing Current and Potential Approaches in Multiple Myeloma:
Updates From Madrid 2024
Learning Objectives
Evaluate clinical trial data assessing current and investigational treatment
approaches in transplant-eligible and transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed
multiple myeloma
Recognise the clinical relevance of data evaluating different treatment
sequencing approaches in the management of relapsed/refractory multiple
myeloma
PeerVoice is an EBAC® accredited provider since 2022.
rvoice.com/XRB870
PeerVoice
Part 1 of 2: Selecting Therapeutic Strategies in Transplant-Eligible
and Transplant-Ineligible NDMM
Philippe Moreau, MD
Professor of Hematology
University Hospital Nantes
Nantes, France
rn 94.1(16/17) Overall 12/17 (70.6)
MRD-evaluable patients 12/15 (80.0)
80
Es PFS and OS
€ 100 100
Lao £
E feo u.
20 sg g
Sa co Zo
o av 2
8 5 18-mo PFS rate (95% Cl): 5 40 18-mo OS rate (95% Cl):
52 93.8% (63.2-99.1) 3 93.8% (632-9911)
67 42 1PFS event out of a 20 108 event out of
a 17 patients 17 patients
o o
ERRE RETTET
Months Months
N= 270 A =
_ Treatment Phase Until Cycle 18 Ar nn]
Randomisation 1:1 Cycles 1> 18 4-week cycles/18 months Week cycles ‘SPM
Stratified by:
+ Age: <75 and Induction Cy1-12: \ (Induction Cy13-18: Y | (Induction Cy19-PD:) / Primary endpoint:
275 years N IsaVRd IsaVR IsaR os
. i D De 01 072078 5 (oy secondary
Cytogenetic A | | APA || PA 1-1 ‘endpoints:
result by FISH [omo ME 270) 25 me im (70) 25 me. CR rate, MRD- CR
(Modified AAA Nbre) (NGS, 10") rate,
Perrot score) Induction Cyl-12: \) (Induction Cyi3-18:)) (Induction Cy19=PD:) | *VPR rate, PFS. 0S,
+ Centre ’ IsaRd Isar Isar
k Bee ee or 08 vw 02200 | Discontinue based on
0010 eh, Eo] ee PD, unacceptable
00250 ia La PO) 25 me [atop 250m toxicities, patient
Min te Ft + | withdrawal
* 2 ÉS > rs =
MRD (bone In case of 12 months 18 months 24 months Yearly
marrow aspirate) PR or better
Abbreviation(s): MRO: minimal residual disease.
Reference(s): Moreau P et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $204.
PERSEUS TRIAL: D-VRd + D-R vs VRd +R
Abbreviation(s): D-VRd: daratumumab/bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (VRd).
Reference(s): Sonneveld P et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $201.
Sonneveld P et al. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:301-313.
GMMG-HD7 TRIAL: Isa-RVd vs RVd
Abbreviation(s): CR: complete response; Isa: isatuximab; ITT: intention-to-treat; NGF: next-generation flow; OR: odds
ratio; RVd: lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone; VGPR: very good partial response.
Reference(s): Raab MS et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $202.
CARTITUDE-2: Cilta-cel + Lenalidomide Maintenance in Suboptimal Response to Frontline ASCT
Abbreviation(s): OS: overall survival; sCR: sCR: stringent CR.
Reference(s): Roeloffzen W et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $205.
Reference(s): Facon T et al. EHA 2024; Abstract S100.
Facon T et al. N Engl J Med. 2024; June 3. doil0.1056/NEJMoa2400712. Online ahead of print.
BENEFIT/IFM2020-05: Isa-VRd vs Isa-Rd
Abbreviation(s): AE: adverse event; FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridisation; NGS: next-generation sequencing;
PD: progressive disease; SPM: second primary malignancy.
Reference(s): Leleu X et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $203.
Leleu X et al. Nat Med. 2024; 3 June. Published online. https://doi.org/101038/s41591-024-03050-2.
BENEFIT/IFM2020-05: Isa-VRd vs Isa-Rd (Cont'd)
Reference(s): Leleu X et al. EHA 2024; Abstract $203.
Leleu X et al. Nat Med. 2024; 3 June. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1038/541591-024-03050-2.
100 24-mo rate for pts with 100
90 2CR (95% Cl): 0 1“, Median OS, 24.6 mo (95% Cl, 13.4-NE)
& 80 87.9% (731-948) x 80
> 70 = 70
2 60 Ea]
E 24-mo rate for pts with É 60
3 OR (95% Cl): 3 50
2 30 | Median OR, mo (osx ci) 969% (544-767) 22
& 20 À— Pts with OR NR (NE-NE) 2 20
10 | — Pts with ¿CR NR (NE-NE) e o
o PFS >
92.30 9 BBB 2124.27 299980" 90 0 3 6 9 1215 18 21242730333639
Months 90 e EN Months
& so
25 24-mo rate for pts with
Eso 2CR (95% CI):
so 90.6% (76.9-96.4)
2 mu
2 30 | Median prs,mo (05% Cl)
À 20 | —Overal172(08-NE)
10 | —Pts with 2CR NR (NE-NE)
o
CAR: chimeric antigen receptor; CD3: cluster of differentiation 3; GPRCSD: G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5
member D; RRMM: relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Reference(s): Chari A et al. N Engl J Med. 2022:387:2232-2244.
Moreau P et al. N Engl J Med. 2022:387:495-505.
San-Miguel J et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;389:335-347.
Munshi NC et al. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:705-716.
Rodriguez-Otero P et al. N Engl J Med. 2023;388:1002-1014.
Lonial $ et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:207-221.
DREAMM-7: BVd vs DVd in RRMM
Abbreviation(s): BVd: belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) plus bortezomib and dexamethasone; CR: complete response;
Dvd: daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone; MRD: minimal residual disease; ORR: overall/objective
response rate; sCR: stringent CR; VGPR: very good partial response (PR).
Reference(s): Mateos MV et al. 29th European Hematology Association Congress (EHA 2024). Abstract $214,
Abbreviation(s): BPd: belamaf plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone; PVd: pomalidomide plus bortezomib and
dexamethasone.
Reference(s): Dimopoulos MA et al. EHA 2024. Abstract LB3440.
CARTITUDE-4: Cilta-Cel vs SOC in Functional High-Risk MM
Abbreviation(s): DOR: duration of response; LOT: lines of treatment;
of care.
Reference(s): Weisel K et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P959.
E: not evaluable; NR: not reached; SOC: standard
MagnetisMM-3: Elranatamab
lohty M et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P932.
Reference(s):
MajesTEC-1: Teclistamab
Abbreviation(s): CR: complete response.
Reference(s): Sidana S et al. EHA 2024. Abstract P879.