Assessor-Best-Practice-Guidebook-Digital 111-.pdf

roba64 14 views 31 slides Aug 01, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 31
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31

About This Presentation

it is about assessment


Slide Content

Assessment methods will be:

What is Good Assessment

Manageable

Evidence will be

Vall assessment efit for purpose, so that assessment focuses on te requirements specified
inunk standard

Direct = assessment actives willbe as similar as possible the conditions of actual performance.

Authentic the assessor will be confident that the work being assessed attribuable tothe person
being asserted ~ outside assistance must not distort the assessment,

Sufficient the evidence vil establish with confidence that al cera have been met and that

performance to the required standard coud be epeated with consistency.

Assessment will be:

Systematic - planning and recording wil be rigorous to ensure sufiincy and fines in

‘Open —larnersill understand the assessment processandthecrteriatobe applied, andean
contribute tothe planing and accumulation of evidence.

“consistant given similar cumstances the assessor would make the ame jodgement again
“and the judgement wl be similar to judgements that other asessors would mat.

Delivery options

®

foraqualíicationa

A
(9
© }©- [o |,
Programme Programme xy
&
©

Guidance Information

puce information ais th develope tale Int contention any lative
equerments forthe tring and seanant ofthe ne andré La Hatha Sly st
‘WoW Ac 20%, Reseurce Management et Naive lat Peteco et 36

Remy ao cover defniions het neato be made ls

E Comments on this unit standard
EZ ease cortatthePimay 10

standardsOprimaryito.ac.nz

{youve HE ag tothe cote of hs un standard

— Tr EL... EEE

Evidence

‘There are varying types of evidence gathering methods for
assessment. Although this evidence is not distinct from each
other, the next diagram shows the typical evidence models.

Typical evidence mc

Evidence

juestioning and observing the learner
Imenting on their

Triangular method Qualities ofa Verifier

Comerstion
© Trainee
O Verter

Documentation
O WorkDiry

er Evidence
© Obtention
O Farmer verison

Verifier Signoff

A verifier is required to sign off the learner's work. Where a
verifier is to provide comments, this is a mandatory requirement
and not alike to do. This adds context to what the trainee has
done while the verifier conducted his/her observation. If there
were any questions asked of the learner, then these are to be
recorded in the Comments section also.

Example of Verifier Sigr

Competence is:

‘The ability to repeatedly perform individual tasks toa specified stan
‘The ability to manage several different tasks within the job.
‘The ability to respond to irregularities and breakdown in routine

‘The ability to deal with the responsibilities and expectations of the work
environment, including working with others.

‘The ability to continue to learn in rapidly changing work environments.

Moderation Appeals

‘An assessor has the right to appeal moderation decisions. If you disagree with a

‘moderation decision you are to contact the Quality Team atthe ITO in the first instance
‘where we will make every effort to resolve your complaint. If you are unsatisfied with
‘this outcome, then you are to lodge a formal appeal by completing a moderation appeal

form and submit a

etailed.

You willfind this form located on the PITO website atthe Provi

& Assessor page.

|

Feedback to the ITO

{As a continuous improvement mech:

ism, the ITO encourages feedback. You
‚sment similar to the one.
ou have any feedback