Athol furniture case solution service operations management

nivethas139939 81 views 28 slides Aug 26, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 28
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28

About This Presentation

athol case solution


Slide Content

ATHOL
FURNITURE
Presented by Group 16
PGP/27/072 HUDA EBRAHIM
PGP/27/158 S NIVETHA
PGP/27/232 UDISH SWAMI
PGP/27/252 GAURAV GUPTA

Question 1
Huff Location Model : store size and
location recommendation
1.
Data given
λ = 1.0
>10,000 sqft
Increments of 5,000 sqft
Attractiveness of Facility Calculation
(Aij) = (Sj) / [(Tij)^ λ]
where,
-Aij => Attractiveness of facility j for consumer i
-Sj => Size of facility j
-Tij => Travel time from customer i's location to facility j
-λ => Parameter estimated empirically to reflect the effect of
travel time on various kinds of shopping trips

Question 1
Huff Location Model : store size and
location recommendation
1.

Question 1
Huff Location Model : store size and
location recommendation
1.
Calculation of Probability
Probability, Pij=Aij/Σ Aij
where,
Pij => Probability of customer from area i travelling to facility j
Aij => Attractiveness of facility j for consumer i

Question 1
Huff Location Model : store size and
location recommendation
1.
Probablity a Customer from area I will travel to facility j

Question 1
Huff Location Model : store size and
location recommendation
1.
Probablity a Customer from area I will travel to facility j

Question 1
Huff Location Model : store size and
location recommendation
1.
RECOMMENDATION
The store should be located at site Y, 20,000 Size

Question 2
2. The expected annual net operating profit
before taxes and expected market share for
the outlet.
Estimate, Ejk=Σ (PijCiBik)
where,
Ejk => Total Annual Customer Expenditure for product class k at facility j
Pij => Probability of customer from area i travelling to facility j
Ci => Number of customer at area i
Bik => Avg Annual Customer Budget at area i for product class k
Calculation of Total Expenditure

Question 2
2. The expected annual net operating profit
before taxes and expected market share for
the outlet.

Question 2
2. The expected annual net operating profit
before taxes and expected market share for
the outlet.

Question 2
2. The expected annual net operating profit
before taxes and expected market share for
the outlet.
Market Share Estimate, Mjk=Ejk/ Σ (CiBik)
where,
-Mjk => Market share captured by facility j of product class k
-Ejk => Total Annual Customer Expenditure for product class k at facility j
-Ci => Number of customer at area i
-Bik => Avg Annual Customer Budget at area i for product class k
Calculation of Market Share

Question 2
2. The expected annual net operating profit
before taxes and expected market share for
the outlet.

Question 2
2. The expected annual net operating profit
before taxes and expected market share for
the outlet.
Recommendation
The store should be located at site Y as it has high market share and
customer expenditure.
The expected net operating profit before taxes would be 2.9

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 0.5

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 0.5

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 0.5

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 0.5

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 0.5

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 0.5

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 5.0

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 5.0

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 5.0

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 5.0

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 5.0

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
λ = 5.0

Question 3
3. Alternative λ = 0.5 and 5.0
The measurement of attractiveness to site Y for different λ values suggests
that the propensity of customer travel is higher when λ is lower and tends to
decrease as λ value increases.
CONCLUSION

Simplicity and Assumptions: The model assumes homogeneity in consumer preferences and uniform
attractiveness, which doesn't reflect the diversity of consumer behavior. The distance decay function
used is also a simplification, not accounting for real-world travel complexities.
1.
Static Nature: It provides a static analysis, not accounting for changes over time like new competitors
or shifts in consumer preferences.
2.
Limited Variables: The model primarily considers attractiveness and distance, neglecting factors like
price, brand loyalty, and socioeconomic status.
3.
Data Requirements: The model's accuracy relies on high-quality data, and inaccuracies can lead to
misleading results.
4.
Over-simplification: It oversimplifies complex purchasing decisions, ignoring psychological, cultural,
and situational factors.
5.
Non-Spatial Factors: The model doesn't account for non-spatial elements like online shopping trends.6.
Geographic Limitations: The model's assumptions may not hold in areas with complex geographic
and transportation dynamics.
7.
4. Shortcomings of the model

THANK YOU
Group 16
Tags