Automated way of mapping the visual field Important diagnostic test in glaucoma Diagnosing and monitoring progression of other disease
Traquair described it as a field of vision in a sea of darkness It has a shape of a hill Peak representing fovea 2 slopes representing nasal and temporal field of vision
Kinetic perimetry Stimuli is moved from a non seeeing area to a seeing area along a set meridian Aim is to find points in the visual field of equal retinal sensitivity Lister perimetry Campimetry Goldman perimetry
Static perimetry Intensity of the stimuli at the same pre determined spot is varied Find out threshold at those locations More accurate than kinetic perimetry Gives a 3D picture of the hill of vision Picks up field defects more accurately
Apostlib is an absolute measure of luminance and is equal to 0.3183 candela m2 or 0.1 mililambert Decibel is a measure of sensitivity of retina Inversely proportional It is a relative measure varies from machine to machine
Testing strategy Full threshold Threshold Suprathreshold
Full threshold strategy Staircase method (4-2 bracketing strategy) Used to detect threshold
4-2 bracketing Intensity of stimulus is decreased in 4-db step till stimulus is no longer seen Increasing the stimulus in 2-db step till stimulus is seen again
Threshold perimetry Threshold found at predetermined points Time consuming process
Suprathreshold perimetry Intensity of stimulus shown at a spot much higher than threshold at that spot Mainly for screening Picks up gross visual defects
Newer threshold strategy Fastpac : Decreases the test time by 40% 3-db increment instead of 4-db Threshold crossed only once
Sita standard: Takes half time than full threshold method Sita fast: Takes half time than fast pac threshold method
30-2 Number of test points:76 Density :6 degree Only 3 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot
24-2 Number of test points:54 Density: 6 degree Only 3 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot
10-2 central threshold test Number of test points: 68 Density: 2 degree Only 1 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot
Macular programme Number of test points: 16 Density: 2 degree Only 1 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot
Reliabilty indices Fixation losses: Indicates steadiness of gaze Presenting stimuli at blind spot loss.>20% is unreliable
False positives Trigger happy patients Responds to an audible stimuli when no target is presented >33% is unrelible
False negative: Fails to respond to a suprathreshold stimuli Indicates fatigue,inattentiveness >33% is unreliable
Zone 1 Colour of the stimulus Background illumination: 31.5 asb Stimulus size: III Testing strategy
Zone 3
Zone 4 total deviation Depicts difference between patients threshold fom that of age matched normals Reveals generalised depression Cannot confirm scotoma
Zone 5 pattern deviation Reveals focal defects after adjusting for overall depression Confirms scotoma
Global indices Mean deviation: Indicates overall deviation of the visual field from normal Positive number indicates an elevated field Negative number indicates a depressed field Cannot confirm scotoma
Psd Derived from total deviation Indicates the degree to which the numbers differ from each other Highlights pot-holes in hill of vision Calls attention for scotoma
Short term fluctuation Measure of intra-test variability Threshold at 10 pre selected points is tested Difference between 1 & 2 measurement noted
Cpsd is psd corrected for sf If sf is due to unreliability Then cpsd is better If sf is due to pathology Then psd is better
GHT 5 set of points above horizontal meridian Compared to mirror image below horizontal meridian
Zone 8 Numerical display: Gives the threshold for all points checked Value in () indicates that the point has been tested twice
Never rely on first report Always correlate clinically Correct any significant refractive error before proceeding
Sources of error Miosis : decreases the threshold sensitivity in peripheral field Increases the variability in central field Uncorrected refractive errors: Threshold sensitivity appears less Hyperopic patient with contact lens: Defect gets magnified & vice versa
Spectacles can cause rim scotomas Ptosis : Suppression of superior visual field
Principle Is there a field defect ? Is it due to glaucoma ? Is the defect progressing ? Compare to selected baseline Discard learning fields from baseline Recognise false progression
False progression Learning curve Long term fluctuation Pupil size
Pupil: 1 mm
Pupil: 2.5 mm
Andersons criteria 1. pattern deviation plot: 3 non-edge points with p<5% One point with p<1% Cluster in arcuate area 2.cpsd Abnormal with p<5% on 2 consecutive occasion 3.abnormal GHT
CATARACT
GLAUCOMA
CATARACT & GLAUCOMA
Detecting progression Overview printout Glaucoma change probability analysis
Overview print out Sequential series of field of same patient over a period of time Displays gray scales,total &pattern deviation Statistical analysis is however not provided
This patient developed cataract,which was extracted later Pattern deviation plot remained clear
Glaucoma progression
Glaucoma change probability analysis Compares rate of change in patients visual field,with that of stable glaucoma patient Clear triangle represents improvements Solid ones shows points of deterioration Progression represented by a cluster of black triangles in same area increasing in size with time
2 or more points deteriorate on 2 consecutive test
3 or more points deteriorate on 3 consecutive test
Advanced field defects Why pattern deviation plot not showing defect
Not enough points with sensitivity to produce pattern deviation plot
Follow up with 10-2 Enough sensitive points to produce pattern deviation
Advanced defect f/u with a size V target(64mm 2 )
Macular programme in advanced defects
Size V target:macular split Macular split (0 db) next to fovea may indicate wipe out