Automated perimetry

16,489 views 72 slides Jul 01, 2014
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 72
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72

About This Presentation

Automated perimetry


Slide Content

Automated Perimetry Dr.Vikram.S.Nakhate Dr.Vijay.Shetty

Automated way of mapping the visual field Important diagnostic test in glaucoma Diagnosing and monitoring progression of other disease

Traquair described it as a field of vision in a sea of darkness It has a shape of a hill Peak representing fovea 2 slopes representing nasal and temporal field of vision

Kinetic perimetry Stimuli is moved from a non seeeing area to a seeing area along a set meridian Aim is to find points in the visual field of equal retinal sensitivity Lister perimetry Campimetry Goldman perimetry

Static perimetry Intensity of the stimuli at the same pre determined spot is varied Find out threshold at those locations More accurate than kinetic perimetry Gives a 3D picture of the hill of vision Picks up field defects more accurately

Apostlib is an absolute measure of luminance and is equal to 0.3183 candela m2 or 0.1 mililambert Decibel is a measure of sensitivity of retina Inversely proportional It is a relative measure varies from machine to machine

Testing strategy Full threshold Threshold Suprathreshold

Full threshold strategy Staircase method (4-2 bracketing strategy) Used to detect threshold

4-2 bracketing Intensity of stimulus is decreased in 4-db step till stimulus is no longer seen Increasing the stimulus in 2-db step till stimulus is seen again

Threshold perimetry Threshold found at predetermined points Time consuming process

Suprathreshold perimetry Intensity of stimulus shown at a spot much higher than threshold at that spot Mainly for screening Picks up gross visual defects

Newer threshold strategy Fastpac : Decreases the test time by 40% 3-db increment instead of 4-db Threshold crossed only once

Sita standard: Takes half time than full threshold method Sita fast: Takes half time than fast pac threshold method

30-2 Number of test points:76 Density :6 degree Only 3 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot

24-2 Number of test points:54 Density: 6 degree Only 3 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot

10-2 central threshold test Number of test points: 68 Density: 2 degree Only 1 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot

Macular programme Number of test points: 16 Density: 2 degree Only 1 degree bare area is left surrounding the fixation spot

Reliabilty indices Fixation losses: Indicates steadiness of gaze Presenting stimuli at blind spot loss.>20% is unreliable

False positives Trigger happy patients Responds to an audible stimuli when no target is presented >33% is unrelible

False negative: Fails to respond to a suprathreshold stimuli Indicates fatigue,inattentiveness >33% is unreliable

Zone 1 Colour of the stimulus Background illumination: 31.5 asb Stimulus size: III Testing strategy

Zone 3

Zone 4 total deviation Depicts difference between patients threshold fom that of age matched normals Reveals generalised depression Cannot confirm scotoma

Zone 5 pattern deviation Reveals focal defects after adjusting for overall depression Confirms scotoma

Global indices Mean deviation: Indicates overall deviation of the visual field from normal Positive number indicates an elevated field Negative number indicates a depressed field Cannot confirm scotoma

Psd Derived from total deviation Indicates the degree to which the numbers differ from each other Highlights pot-holes in hill of vision Calls attention for scotoma

Short term fluctuation Measure of intra-test variability Threshold at 10 pre selected points is tested Difference between 1 & 2 measurement noted

Cpsd is psd corrected for sf If sf is due to unreliability Then cpsd is better If sf is due to pathology Then psd is better

GHT 5 set of points above horizontal meridian Compared to mirror image below horizontal meridian

Zone 8 Numerical display: Gives the threshold for all points checked Value in () indicates that the point has been tested twice

Never rely on first report Always correlate clinically Correct any significant refractive error before proceeding

Sources of error Miosis : decreases the threshold sensitivity in peripheral field Increases the variability in central field Uncorrected refractive errors: Threshold sensitivity appears less Hyperopic patient with contact lens: Defect gets magnified & vice versa

Spectacles can cause rim scotomas Ptosis : Suppression of superior visual field

Principle Is there a field defect ? Is it due to glaucoma ? Is the defect progressing ? Compare to selected baseline Discard learning fields from baseline Recognise false progression

False progression Learning curve Long term fluctuation Pupil size

Pupil: 1 mm

Pupil: 2.5 mm

Andersons criteria 1. pattern deviation plot: 3 non-edge points with p<5% One point with p<1% Cluster in arcuate area 2.cpsd Abnormal with p<5% on 2 consecutive occasion 3.abnormal GHT

CATARACT

GLAUCOMA

CATARACT & GLAUCOMA

Detecting progression Overview printout Glaucoma change probability analysis

Overview print out Sequential series of field of same patient over a period of time Displays gray scales,total &pattern deviation Statistical analysis is however not provided

This patient developed cataract,which was extracted later Pattern deviation plot remained clear

Glaucoma progression

Glaucoma change probability analysis Compares rate of change in patients visual field,with that of stable glaucoma patient Clear triangle represents improvements Solid ones shows points of deterioration Progression represented by a cluster of black triangles in same area increasing in size with time

2 or more points deteriorate on 2 consecutive test

3 or more points deteriorate on 3 consecutive test

Advanced field defects Why pattern deviation plot not showing defect

Not enough points with sensitivity to produce pattern deviation plot

Follow up with 10-2 Enough sensitive points to produce pattern deviation

Advanced defect f/u with a size V target(64mm 2 )

Macular programme in advanced defects

Size V target:macular split Macular split (0 db) next to fovea may indicate wipe out

Thank you