Phenotypic typing system
characteristics
Typing systemTypeability Reproducibility Discrimination Ease of
interpretation
Ease of
performance
Serotyping
Most Good Fair Good Fair
Phage typing
Most Fair Fair Fair Poor
Antibiotic
susceptibility
testing
All Fair Poor Excellent Excellent
MLEE
All Excellent Good Excellent Good
Southern/Northern blottingE P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E
Separate DNA
fragments on the
agarose gel
"Blot" DNA to
membran
Membrane imprinted
with DNA bands
Add a labelled probe
to the membrane
Visualization reveals a band
where your probe bound to
the target sequence
PFGE of Chromosomal DNA
•ThistechniqueovercomesthelimitationsofREA.Itisa
variationofagarosegelelectrophoresisinwhichthe
orientationoftheelectricfieldacrossthegelischanged
periodically.
•Thismodificationenableslargefragmentstobeeffectively
separatedbysize.
•Advantages:
•Allthestrainscanbytypedwithgoodreproducibility.
Restrictionprofilesareeasilyreadandinterpreted.
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
•Rare cutting enzymes
•Alternate current orientations allow separation of large DNA fragments
•Highly discriminatory and reproducible; currently the method of choice for typing a
range of bacteria
LIMITATIONS: time consuming (≥2 days), expensive, specialized equipmentE P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E
Random Amplification of Polymorphic DNA (RAPD )
Uses short primers that find a lot of targets
Different size amplicons
Products separated by electrophoresis
LIMTATIONS:
•Identification of suitable primers
•Difficult to interpret differences in the
intensity of bands
•Inefficient reactions
•Amplification of cryptic genetic material
(prophages, bacteriophages)E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S E
Multi Locus sequence typing
(MLST)
•Used to type multiple loci of housekeeping genes
•Targets different DNA pieces and sequences
Compares results with data banks
Pro: Highly comparable
Con: Expensive equipment
Genotypic typing system characteristics
Typing system
Typeability Reproducibility Discrimination
Ease of
interpretation
Ease of
performance
REA
All Good Good Poor Excellent
Ribotyping All Excellent Fair Good Good
PFGE
All Excellent Excellent Excellent Good
Restriction
digests of PCR
products
All Excellent Good Excellent Good
PCR based on
repeated
sequences
All Good Good Good Good
RAPD All Fair Good Fair Good
Nucleotide
sequencing
All Excellent Excellent Excellent Fair
Limitations of typing methods
•Discriminatory function
•Type of material and pathogen
•Reproducibility , cost, technique, etc.
•No “gold standard”
Results of a typing system should be considered relative to
the available epidemiological data or to the results of other
systems
•The technique used needs to be adapted to the question
Application of typing systems
Detection of outbreaks:
Concept of “prior probability”; rigorous epidemiological
investigation and data to avoid misleading results
Epidemiological
investigation
Request for Molecular
typing
•Increased prevalence
•Same bacteria species from
a cluster of cases
•Multiple isolates with
distinct biotype/ AST
pattern
Typing technique
with good
reproducibility &
discriminatory
power
Applications of typing systems
•Distinguish relapse from re-infection
•Identify types associated with increased transmission &
virulence
•Used to identify a number of pathogens
•Help to find out the serotypes easily
•Help to find out any epidemiology or any outbreak
•Emergence of new types ; implications on control measures