Classification denotes the arrangement of a single plant or group of plants an distinct category following a system of nomenclature, and in accordance with a particular and well established plan.
Size: 640.48 KB
Language: en
Added: Aug 13, 2019
Slides: 19 pages
Slide Content
B entham and Hooker’s System of Angiosperm C lassification Dr Manoj Joshi Department of Botany Khandelwal College Of Management Science and Technology
Classification denotes the arrangement of a single plant or group of plants an distinct category following a system of nomenclature, and in accordance with a particular and well established plan. Some of the earlier systems of classification of angiosperms were artificial systems, since they used only certain superficial characteristics as the basis. With more and more detailed study on the morphological, physiological and reproductive aspects of angiosperms, the artificial systems of classifications were replaced by the natural systems of classification. INTRODUCTION
George Bentham and Joseph Dalton Hooker - Two English taxonomists who were closely associated with the Royal Botanical Garden at Kew, England have given a detailed classification of plant kingdom, particularly the angiosperms. They gave an outstanding system of classification of phanerogams in their Genera Plantarum which was published in three volumes between the years 1862 to 1883. It is a natural system of classification. They described 97,205 species of flowering plants grouped into 202 orders (now recognised as families). The system has the advantage of being the first great natural system of classification, which is very easy to follow. INTRODUCTION
George Bentham 1800-1884 Joseph Dalton Hooker 1817-1911 A taxonomic system , the Bentham & Hooker system for seed plants was published in : G. Bentham & J.D. Hooker (1862–1883). Genera plantarum ad exemplaria imprimis in herbariis kewensibus servata definita (three volumes)
The system recognises the following main groups: Class DICOTYLEDONES DICOTYLEDONUM POLYPETALE vol I Series 1. THALAMIFLORÆSeries 2. DISCIFLORÆSeries 3. CALYCIFLORÆ DICOTYLEDONES GAMOPETALÆ vol II Series 1. INFERÆSeries 2. HETEROMERÆSeries 3. BICARPELLATÆ DICOTYLEDONES MONOCHLAMIDEÆ vol III Class GYMNOSPERMEÆ vol III (1) Class MONOCOTYLEDONES vol III (2)
HETEROMERAE Flowers with superior ovary Number of carpels - more than two Ebenales Families Sapotaceae Ebenaceae Styracaceae Primulales Families Plumbaginaceae Primulaceae Myrsinaceae Ericales Families Ericaceae Clethraceae Epacridaceae Diapensiaceae Lennoceae Orders
1 . One of the most valuable contribution of this work is the description of the taxa at all levels. Description are accurate and easy to identify plant species up to family level. 2. Because the description were based on direct observation by the authors they become models of accuracy . 3. This system placed order Ranales placed at the beginning of the system is very reasonable. 4. The placement of dicots before monocots is also accepted by all the modern taxonomists. Merits
1 . Gymnosperms are most primitive than angiosperms and placing gymnosperms in between dicots and monocots is a serious error. 2. The introduction of monochlamydeae is another drawback . Since this group contains advanced and primitive forms. 3. Among the monocot Orchidaceae is placed in the beginning with all it’s advanced characters. 4. The subdivision of the monocot is based on the position of ovary and characters of perianth . This may resulted in the anomalous situation for many families. Demerits