Identification and Attachment of Property of Proclaimed
Person
•Section86ofBNSSprovidesthattheCourtmay,onthe
writtenrequestfromapoliceofficernotbelowtherank
ofSuperintendentofPoliceorCommissionerofPolice,
initiatetheprocessofrequestingassistancefroma
CourtoranauthorityinthecontractingStatefor
identification,attachmentandforfeitureofproperty
belongingtoaproclaimedperson.
•Theintentionbehindthisprovisionseemstobeeither
tosecurethepresenceoffugitivesorconfiscate
propertiesoffugitiveswhoareevading
summons/investigation/trialandhavepropertiesoutside
thecountry.
Additional power for attachment
and for forfeiture of property
•Section107ofBNSSgivesmagistratepowertoattachedproperty
identifiedas“processedofcrime”
•ThemagistratemayuponanapplicationofanI.O.givingreasonsto
believethatpropertyisderivedfromacriminalactivity,passthe
followingorders:-
a)Directattachmentofpropertyfoundtobe“proceedsofcrime”
afterhearingallpartiesconcerned:
b)Passanex-partyinterimorderattachingproperty:-ifthe
magistrateisoftheopinionthatissuingnoticetotheownerofthe
propertyforattachmentwilldefeattheobjectoftheattachmentor
seizure:and
c)Upondeterminationthatthepropertyinquestionfallsunder
proceedofcrime,themagistratewilldirecttheDistrictMagistrate
torateablydistributethepropertyamongstthosewhoareaffected
bysuchcrime.
Power to remove obstructions by a police
officer
•Section172oftheBNSSisanewlyinsertedprovision
whichcastsanobligationonpersonstoconformtothe
lawfuldirectionsofapoliceofficerinthefulfillmentof
anyofhisdutyundertherelevantchapterpertainingto
thepreventiveactionofthePolice.
•Further,thePoliceofficerhasthepowertodetainor
removeanypersonresisting,refusing,ignoring,or
disregardingtoconformtoanydirectiongivenbysuch
policeofficer.
•Thepoliceofficermayeitherpresentsuchperson
beforeaMagistrateorinpettycases,releasehimwithin
aperiodof24hours.
ZERO FIR
•ItismandatoryforpolicetoregisteraFIRwhere
informationregardingcommissionofa
cognizableoffenceisreceivedeitherorallyor
throughelectroniccommunicationirrespectiveof
whetherithasjurisdictionornot(Section173of
BNSS).
•OncethezeroFIRregister,theconcernedPolice
StationcantransfersuchFIRtothePoliceStation
whichhasjurisdictiontoinvestigatethecase.
Introduction of timelines Preliminary
enquiry and investigation
•Oneofthemoresignificantchangessoughttobe
broughtaboutthroughtheBNSSistheattemptto
addressthedelaysininvestigationandtrial.
Specifiedtimelineshavebeenprescribedfor
variousstagesofthecriminalprocessincludingto
completetheinvestigationandfileafinalreport
andfortrialoftheoffence.
•Forinstance,itismandatoryforaMagistrateto
decidewhethertotakecognizanceofthecharge
sheetwithinaperiodof14days.
Use of electronic communication and video
conferencing in investigation, inquiry and trial
•TheBNSShassoughttoadoptelectronic
communicationandvideoconferencing
facilitiesatvariousstagesincludingatthetime
ofinquiry,investigation,andtrial.For
instance,theBNSSpermitsgivinginformation
asregardscommissionofacognizablein
electronicform.
Issuance of process
•AsummonsissuedbyaCourtunderSection63
(correspondingtoSection61oftheCrPC),orawitness
underSection71,orawarrantmayalsobeintheformof
electroniccommunication.
•Section94oftheBNSS(correspondingtoSection91ofthe
CrPC)nowpermitsaCourtoranofficerinchargeofa
policestationtosummonelectroniccommunicationwhich
islikelytocontaindigitalevidence.
•Section231oftheBNSSprovidesthatsupplyofcopiesof
statementsanddocumentstoaccusedinothercasestriable
byCourtofSessionarepermittedtobeissuedbythe
Magistrateinanelectronicform.
Use of audio-visual electronic means
in investigations
•UnderSection176oftheBNSSprovidingfor
procedureforinvestigationofcognizableoffence
(correspondingtoSection157oftheCrPC),the
statementofthevictimmayalsoberecordedthrough
audio-videoelectronicmeansincludingacellphone,as
alsothatofawitnessunderSection265(3)ofthe
BNSS.
•Similarly,Section185oftheBNSS(dealingwith
searchbyapoliceofficercorrespondingtoSection165
ofheCrPC)requiresthesearchtoberecordedthrough
audio-visualelectronicmeanspreferablybycellphone.
Production of Devices Containing
Digital Evidence
•ACourtoranofficerinchargeofapolicestationcan
compelproductionofcommunicationdeviceswhich
arelikelytocontaindigitalevidencefromtheperson
whoisinpossessionofsuchdigitalevidence.
•Thisprovisionmaygivetheinvestigatingauthority
unrestricteduseofelectronicdeviceincompletebreach
ofrighttoprivacyaswellasprivilege.
•Thepositiveaspectofhavingsuchaprovisionisthat
theproductionoforiginaldeviceswillensurethe
genuinenessofthedigitalevidence.
•Ifsuchdigitalevidenceshavebeendeleted,withtheaid
oftechnology,suchevidencescanberetrieved.
Conduct of proceedings through
electronic means
•Section355oftheBNSS(correspondingtoSection317
oftheCrPC)nowinsertsanewexplanationtosub-
section(2)providingthatpersonalattendanceofthe
accusedincludesattendancethroughaudiovideo
electronicmeans.
•Onthesamevein,Section530oftheBNSSnowallows
thatalltrials,inquiriesandproceedingsincluding
issuance,serviceandexecutionofsummonsand
warrant;examinationofcomplainantandwitnesses;
recordingofevidenceininquiriesandtrials;andall
appellateproceedingsoranyotherproceedingmaybe
heldinelectronicmode,byuseofelectronic
communicationoruseofaudio-videoelectronicmeans.
Cognizance of special law and cases
against public servants
•TheBNSS,underSection210(1)nowpermitsa
magistratetotakecognizanceofanyoffencealsoin
relationtoacomplaintfiledbyapersonauthorized
underanyspeciallawwhichconstitutesanoffence.
•theMagistratemayalsotakecognizanceagainsta
publicservantarisinginthecourseofdischargeofhis
officialdutiessubjectto(i)receivingareport
containingfactsandcircumstancesoftheincidentfrom
theofficersuperiortosuchpublicservant;and(ii)after
considerationoftheassertionsmadebythepublic
servantastothesituationthatledtotheincidentso
alleged.
Trial against an absconding person
•AnothersignificantadditionthroughtheBNSSistheintroductionof
Section356,whichprovidesforaninquiry,trialtobeconductedora
judgmenttobepassedagainstaproclaimedoffender,inabsentia.
•Intryingaproclaimedoffenderwhohasabscondedtoevadetrial
andwherethereisnoimmediateprospectofarrestinghim,itshall
bedeemedtooperateaswaiveroftherightofsuchpersontobe
presentandtriedinperson,andtheCourtshall,afterrecording
reasonsinwriting,intheinterestofjustice,proceedwiththetrialin
thelikemannerandwithlikeeffectasifhewaspresent,underthis
Sanhitaandpronouncethejudgment.
•Further,theproclaimedoffendershallnotpreferanappealunlesshe
presentshimselfbeforetheCourtofAppeal.
•Further,noappealagainstconvictionshalllieaftertheexpiryof
threeyearsfromthedateofjudgment.
Other relevant provisions In relation
to trial
•Section269(7)oftheBNSS(correspondingto
Section246oftheCrPC)whichisnewlyinserted
providesthatwheredespitegivingopportunityto
theprosecutionandaftertakingallreasonable
measures,,iftheattendanceofprosecution
witnessescannotbesecuredforcross
examination,itshallbedeemedthatsuchwitness
hasnotbeenexaminedfornotbeingavailable,
andtheMagistratemayclosetheprosecution
evidenceforreasonstoberecordedinwritingand
proceedwiththecaseonthebasisofthematerials
onrecord.
Clarifications with respect to
Limitation period and
Superintendence of the High Court
•TheBNSSnowclarifiesthat(i)forcomputing
theperiodoflimitation,therelevantdateshall
bethedateoffilingcomplaintunderSection
223orthedateofrecordinginformationunder
Section173;and(ii)thateveryHighCourt
shallsoexerciseitssuperintendenceover
SessionsCourtsinthestate.