Managing Organizational Performance
Impact of reward on individual performance
Influences on performance
High performance culture and work systems
Impact of reward on organizational performance
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
8Managing Team Performance
8Managing Individual Performance
What is performance?
How does reward impact performance?✓
•Performance is getting the job done
•Producing the result that you aimed at
•Performance is a behaviour-the way
in which organizations, teams and
individuals get work done
What is performance?
Influences on performance
Vroom (1964) suggested that performance is a function of
ability and motivation as depicted in the formula:
Performance = ƒ (Ability ×Motivation).
Blumberg and Pringle’s (1982) formula was:
Performance = Individual Attributes ×Work Effort ×
Organizational Support
Bailey et al(2001) focused on another factor affecting
performance-“ Opportunity to participate”
Boxalland Purcell (2003) put forward the ‘AMO’ formula which
states that performance is a function of
Ability + Motivation + Opportunity to Participate
Individual performance
Individual performance is influenced by work
systems. These include the support people get from
the organization and their managers.
Leadership provided by the line managers is
the key factor in improving performance
Developing a high performance culture
Influences on performance
Work
System
Taking
action
Leadership
How does reward impact
performance?
1.
Focusing attention on the values of the organization for high
performance and behaviors required to achieve it
2.
3.
4.
5.
Ensuring that the performance expectations are defined and
understood
Providing the means to encourage and recognize high performance
Enhancing engagement and promoting positive discretionary effort
Persuading talented people to join and stay with the organization
People know what’s expected of them –they are
clear about their goals and accountabilities.
They have the skills and competencies to achieve
their goals.
High performance is recognized and rewarded
accordingly.
People feel that their job is worth doing, and that
there’s a strong fit between the job and their
capabilities.
Characteristics of
High Performance Culture
Managers act as supportive leaders and coaches,
providing regular feedback, performance reviews
and development.
A pool of talent ensures a continuous supply of high
performers in key roles.
There’s a climate of trust and teamwork, aimed at
delivering a distinctive service to the customer.
Another important characteristic is the
encouragement of discretionary behaviour.
Develop high performance
work culture
Implement High
Performance Work
System
Performance
Management
System
Use of rewards
A high-performance work system can be
defined as a specific combination of HR
practices, work structures, and processes
that maximizes employee knowledge, skill,
commitment and flexibility. The key
concept is the “system”
High performance work system
Job
infrastructure
Training &
development
Components of HPWS
Information
sharing &
involvement
Compensation
& motivation
Components of HPWS
Workplacearrangementsthatequipworkerswiththeproperabilitiestodotheirjobs,
providethemwiththemeanstodotheirjobs,andgivethemthemotivationtodotheirjobs.
Job Infrastructure
Investmentinincreasingemployeeskills,knowledgeandability
Training program to enhance employee skills
Tounderstandtheavailablealternativesandmakecorrectdecisions.
Information sharing and worker involvement mechanisms
Compensation & promotion opportunities that provide motivation
Encourageskilledemployeestoengageineffectivediscretionarydecision
makinginavarietyofenvironmentalcontingencies
Impact of reward on Individual
performace
Impact of reward on
organizational performance
Extrinsic and Intrinsic rewards can motivate high
performance; though intrinsic rewards he can have a deeper
& long lasting effect.
They can also convey the message that performance is
important and help to focus on specific aspects of
performance.
Performance improvement can be achieved by
Giving people the opportunity to perform
Provide them knowledge and skill required
Reward them by financial & non-financial means
Impact of reward on
Individual performace
Managing Organizational performance
The aim of managing organizational performance is to increase
organizational capacity of an organization to function effectively.
Managing organizational performance includes five dimensions:
1. Creating visions for the future.
2. Planning –determining the present organizational state, and
developing strategies to improve that state.
3. Designing, developing and implementing improvement interventions.
4. redesigning and implementing measurement and evaluation
systems.
5. Putting cultural support systems in place to reward and reinforce
progress.
Implementing organizational performance management system which is
linked to the business strategy and support its achievement. They will focus
on delivering work and the working environment as ell as developing
individuals.
Managing Organizational performance
Performance Prism:
A prism reflects light. It illustrates the hidden complexity of something as
simple as light. Similarly, performance prism illustrates the true complexity
of performance measurement and management. It is a thinking aid which
seeks to integrate 5 related perspectives and provide a structure to allow
executives to think through 5 fundamental questions:
1.Stakeholder satisfaction:Who are our stakeholders and what do they
want or need?
2.Stakeholder contribution:What do we want and need from our
stakeholders?
3.Strategies: What strategies do we put in place to satisfy these wants and
needs?
4.Processes:What processes do we put in place to satisfy these wants and
needs?
5.Capabilities:What capabilities-people, practices, technology and
infrastructure-do we need to put in place to allow us to operate our
processes more effectively and efficiently?
•Setting work objectives
–Project team agrees project plans that define what has to be done
–Who does it and specify individual expectations
–The standards expected and time scale
•Setting process objectives
–Interpersonal relationships
–The quality of participation and collaborative effort and decision making
–The team’s relationship with internal and external customers
–The capacity of the team to plan and control its activities
–The ability of the team and its members to adapt to new demands and situations
–The flexibility with which the team operates
–The effectiveness with which individual skills are used
–Quality of communication within the team and between other teams or individuals
Managing team performance
•Team performance reviews
–General feedback review
•Progress of the team as a whole
•Problems encountered by the team
•Helps and hindrances to the operation of the team
–Work review
•How well the team has functioned
•Review of the individual contribution made by each team member
•Discussion of any new problem encountered by individual team members
–Group problem solving
•Analysis of reasons for any shortfalls or other problems
•Agreement of what needs to be done to solve them and prevent their re-occurrence
–Update objectives
•Review of new opportunities, requirements or threats
•Amendment and updating of objectives and project plans
Managing team performance
Managing individual performance
•Performance Management Strategy
–Based on resource based view
–Strategic goal will be to create firms which are more intelligent and flexible than
their competitors by developing more talented staff and extending their skills
base
•Purpose of Performance Management
–Get better results from organization, teams and individuals
–Establishing shared understanding of what is to be achieved
–To manage and develop people to achieve the desired goal
–Enhance engagement by providing foundation upon which many intrinsic and
extrinsic rewards can be built
Managing individual performance
•Principles of Performance Management
–A management tool that helps managers to manage
–Driven by corporate purpose and values
–To obtain solutions that work
–Only interested in things you can do something about and get a visible
improvement
–Focus on changing behavior rather than paperwork
–It’s about how we manage people
–Performance management is what managers do
–Based on accepted principles but operates flexibly
–Focus on development not pay
–Success depends on what organization is and needs to be in its performance
culture
Plan
•role definition
•objectives
•competencies
•performance improvement
•personal development
Act
•carry out role
•implement performance
improvement plan
•implement personal
development plan
Monitor Performance
•monitor performance
•provide continuous feedback
•provide coaching
•deal with under-performers
Review Performance
•dialogue and feedback
•agree strengths and any
areas for improvement
•build on strengths –you are
particularly strong in this area –
how can you make even greater
use of them?
Performance Management Cycle
Key features of performance management
•Agreement between managers and individuals on
performance and what can be done to jointly to
develop strength and deal with weakness
Agreement
•Managers should not attempt to dominate the processDialogue
•Both manager and individual understand and agree
what they expect of one another
Managing
expectations
•Positive feedback to motivate individual by recognizing
their achievements and potential
Positive feedback
•It does not dwell on past and the dialogue is about
what can be done in future
Forward looking
•Managers and individuals are there to manage
performance throughout the year
Continuous
Performance Management as a rewarding process
Non financial reward:
Recognition through feedback
Opportunities to achieve
Scope to develop skills
Guidance on career paths
Financial Rewards:
Contingent pay
Pay progression
Bonuses
Arguments for rating
Templates
Arguments against rating
•Let people know where they
stand
•Necessary to sum up
judgment about people
•Give people something to
strive for
•They provide a basis for
assessing potential
•Needed to inform
performance or contribution
to pay decisions
•Likely to be subjective and inconsistent
•To sum up the overall performance of a
person with a single rating is a gross over
simplification of what may be complex set
of factors affecting that performance
•Hard to rate qualitative aspects of
performance
•Could be demotivating
•Line managers tend not to differentiate
between ratings
•Performance pay or inclusion in a talent
management could dominate performance
reviews and prejudice the real purpose ,
which is to provide basis for developing
skills and improving performance
Rating performance