CHAPTER-2-SOLVING-LINEAR-ALGERBRA111.pptx

MelanieEstebanVentur 0 views 71 slides Sep 27, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 71
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71

About This Presentation

Chapter 2 Solving Linear Algebra


Slide Content

Chapter 2: Solving Linear System

Learning Objectives At the end of the chapter, we will be able to: 1. Find row echelon form and reduced row echelon form; 2. Solve linear systems using gauss jordan reduction and gaussian elimination

Learning Objectives 3. Find the inverse of matrix 4. Determine the equivalent matrices 5. D iscuss the variant of gaussian elimination which is LU-Factorization.

Table of contents Row Echelon Form 2.1 Solving Linear Systems 2.2 Elementary Matrices; Finding   2.3 Equivalent Matrices 2.4 2.5 LU Factorization

ENCHELON FORM OF A MATRIX 2.1

An m x n matrix A is said to be in reduced row echelon from if it satisfies the following properties: All zero rows if there are any appear at the bottom of the matrix. The first nonzero entry from the left of a nonzero row is a 1. This entry is called a leading one of its rows. For each nonzero row, the leading one appears to the right and below any leading ones in preceding rows. If a column contains a leading one, then all other entries in that column are zero.

An m x n matrix satisfying properties (a) (b) and (c) is said to be in row echelon form.   EXAMPLE:

An elementary row (column) operation on a Matrix A is any one of the following operations: Type I: Interchange any two rows (column). Ex. R1↔R3 Type II: Multiply row (column) by nonzero number. Ex. -3R2→R2 Type III: Add and multiply of one row (column) to another. Ex. -3R2 + R4→R4

Example 1 Find a row echelon form of each of the given matrices record the row operations you perform using the notation for elementary row operations.

SOLUTION:

Example 2 Find the reduced row echelon form of each of the given matrices. Record the row operations you perform, using the notation for elementary row operations.

SOLUTION:

Example 3 Find a row echelon form and reduced row echelon form of the given matrices. Record the row operations you perform using the notation for elementary row operations.

SOLUTION:

EXERCISES Find the reduced row echelon form of each of the given matrices record the row operation you perform, using the notation for elementary row operations. 2. Find the row echelon form of each of the given matrices. Record the row operation you perform, using the notation for elementary row operations.

EXERCISES 3 . Find the reduce row echelon form of each of the given matrices. Record the row operation you perform, using the notation for elementary row operations.

SOLVING LINEAR SYSTEM 2.2

Linear equations are equations of the first order. These equations are defined for lines in the coordinate system. An equation for a straight line is called a linear equation. The general representation of the straight-line equation is y= mx+b , where m is the slope of the line and b is the y-intercept. Linear equations are those equations that are of the first order. These equations are defined for lines in the coordinate system.

The echelon forms are more efficiently in determining the solution of a linear system compared with the elimination method. Using the augmented matrix of a linear system together with an echelon form. we develop two methods for solving a system of m linear equations in n unknow. These methods take the augmented matrix of the linear system, perform elementary row operations on it, and obtain a new matrix that represents an equivalent linear system. The important point is that the latter linear system can be solved more easily.

Represents the augmented matrix of a linear system. The n the solution is quickly. found from the corresponding equations

The task of this section is to manipulate the augmented matrix representing a given linear system into a form from which the solution can be found more easily. We now apply row operations to the solution of linear systems.

Theorem 2.3 Let Ax = b and Cx = d be two linear systems each of m equations in n unknowns. If the augmented matrices [A ⁞ b] and [C ⁞ d] arc row equivalent, then the linear systems are equivalent; that is. they have the same solutions. Proof This follows from the definition of row equivalence and from the fact that the three elementary row operations on the augmented matrix are the three manipulations on linear systems which yield equivalent linear systems. We also note that if one system has no solution, then the other system has no solution.

Recall from Section 1.1 that the linear system of the form: is called a homogeneous system. We can also write (1) in matrix form as

We observe that we have developed the essential features of two very straight-forward methods for solving linear systems. The idea consists of starting with the linear system Ax = b, then obtaining a partitioned matrix [C ⁞ d] in either row echelon form or reduced row echelon form that is row equivalent to the augmented matrix [A ⁞ b].

The method where [C ⁞d] is in row echelon form is called Gaussian elimination, the method where [C ⁞d] is in reduced row echelon form is called Gauss'- Jordan reduction. Strictly speaking, the original Gauss-Jordan reduction was more along the lines described in the preceding Remark. The version presented in this book is more efficient. In actual practice, neither Gaussian elimination nor Gauss-Jordan reduction is used as much as the method involving the LU-factorization of A that is discussed in Section 2.5. However. Gaussian elimination and Gauss-Jordan reduction are fine for small problems, and we use the latter heavily in this book.

Gaussian elimination consists of two steps: Step 1. The transformation of the augmented matrix [ A ⁞ b] to the matrix [ C ⁞ d] in row echelon form using elementary row operations. Step 2. Solution of the linear system corresponding to the augmented matrix [ C ⁞ d] using back substitution for the case in which A ~ n x n. and the linear system Ax = h has a unique solution, the matrix [ C ⁞ d] has the following form.

Example 1. The linear system has the augmented matrix

Transforming this matrix to row echelon form, we obtain (verify) Using back substitution, we now have Thus, the solution is x = 2, y = -1, z = 3, which is unique.

1. Consider the linear system. x + y +2z= - 1 x – 2y + z = -5 3x+ y + z= 3. (a) Find all solutions, if any exist. by using the Gaussian elimination method. (b) Find all solutions. if any exist. by using the Gauss10rdan reduction method

2. Find an equation relating (a. b. and c so that the linear system x + 2-3z = a 2x + 3y + 3z = b 5x + 9y – 6 = c is consistent for any values of (a, b, and c that satisfy that equation.

3. Solve the linear system using the row echelon form. Record the row operation you perform, using the notation for elementary row operations. x + y + 2z + 3w = 13 x - 2y + z + w = 8 3x+ y + z- w=1

ELEMENTARY MATRICES  FINDING A^-1  2.3

  Definition:  An n*n elementary matrix of type I, type II, or type III is a matrix obtained from the identity matrix ln by performing a single elementary or elementary column operation of type I, type II, or type III respectively. 

Theorem of ELEMENTARY MATRICES  Theorem 2.5    Let A be an m*n matrix, and let an elementary row(column) operation of type I, type II or type III be performed on A to yield  matrix B. Let E be the elementary matrix obtained from lm (ln) by performing the same elementary row operation as was performed on A. Then B=EA(B=AE).  Example: We can readily verify that B= EA

Theorem 2.6       If A and B are m*n matrices, then A is row equivalent to B if and only if there exist elementary matrices E1,E2,…, Ek  such that B=  Ek  Ek-1… E2 E1A  (B=AE,…E8-1  Ek ).  Theorem 2.7       An elementary matrix E is nonsingular l, and its inverse is an elementary matrix of the same type. 

Lemma 2.1     Let A be an n*n matrix and let the homogeneous system Ax=0 have only the  trival  solution x=0. Then A is row equivalent to ln. ( That is the reduced tow echelon form of A is ln).  Theorem 2.8      A nonsingular if and only if A is a product of elementary matrices.  Corollary 2.2       A is nonsingular if and only if A is row equivalent to ln. ( That is the reduced row echelon form of A is ln). 

Theorem 2.9      The homogeneous system of n linear equations in n unknown Ax=0 has  nontrival  solution if and only if A is singular. ( That is, the reduced row echelon form of A is not equal to ln).  Example: Consider that homogeneous system Ax =0; that

The reduced row echelon form of the augmented Matrix is (Verify), so a solution is x= -2r y= r Where r is any real number. Thus the homogeneous system has a nontrivial solution, and A is singular.

Theorem 2.10    An n*n matrix A is singular if and only if A is row equivalent to matrix B that has a row of zeros ( That is, the reduced row echelon form of A has a row of zeros).  Theorem 2.11       If A and B are n*n matrices such that AB= lm , and BA=ln. Thus B A^-1 

Following are an examples of Elementary Matrices:

EXERCISES 1. Find the inverse of 2. Find the inverse of

EXERCISES 3. Determine if the following homogeneous system has a Nontrivial Solution. w+2x+3y+2z= 0 w+3x+5y+5z= 0 2w+4x+7y+X= 0 -w-2x-6y+7z= 0

EQUIVALENT MATRICES 2.4

We have thus far considered A to be row (column) equivalent to B if B results from A by finite sequence of elementary row (column) operations. A natural extension of this idea is that of considering B to arise from A by finite sequence of elementary row (column) operations. This leads to the notion of equivalence of matrices.

If A and B are two m x n matrices, then A is equivalent to B if we obtain B from A by a finite sequence of elementary row (column) operations.

I In the case of row (column) equivalent we can show that : A. Every matrix is equivalent to itself B. If B is equivalent to A, then A is equivalent to B C. If C is equivalent to B, and B is equivalent to A, then C is equivalent to A 

Let A = Applying elementary row operations, we obtain the following: B = A 2 r 3 + r 2 → r 2 = C= Br 2 ⇔ r 3 =  

D= C 2 r 1 → r 1 = So, we show that Matrices A,B,C and D are equivalent by applying the elementary row operations.. Then, we can also show that if two matrices are row equivalent, then they are equivalent.  

Let A and I be 2x2 matrices defined as follows : A= B= Prove that matrix A is equivalent I  

A = cr 1 – r 2 → r 2 = 1/ cb -d r 2 = br 2 – r 1 → r 1 = = I We can see that we obtain matrix B from A by finite sequence of elementary row (column) operations.  

Given that the following matrices are equivalent, find the value of x, y, z. Then, show the equivalent matrices. A = b =  

Solutions: x +3 = 6 y = 1 z – 3 = 4 x = 3 z = 7 Substitute the value of x, y, and z, we obtain A = B =  

1 . Solve for x, y and z in the Matrix A and B, provided that they are equivalent A= B= 2. Given matrix T and Matrix Y, calculate the value of x and y T = S =   EXERCISES

EXERCISES 3. Solve for all variables of the A and B matrix. Then, prove that they are equivalent.   A = B =  

LU-Factorization 2.5

Example 1:

Submitted by Group 2 Dannazen E. Gullon Erica F. Palisoc Jhon Lloyd R. Palisoc Jessiel P. Quinto Elizabeth P. Soriano Christine P. Tejada Melanie E. Ventura

THANK YOU FOR LISTENING
Tags