CLASSIFICATION OF BONE TUMORS & PRINCIPLES OF LIMB.pptx

147 views 55 slides Oct 19, 2023
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 55
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55

About This Presentation

Classification of bone tumours


Slide Content

CLASSIFICATION OF BONE TUMORS & PRINCIPLES OF LIMB SALVAGE SURGERY Dr Sanjay K Junior resident Orthopaedics KMCT Medical College

Tumours of bone and soft tissue classified on the basis of their principle cell type, and have been classified by the WHO. Tissue diagnosis essential to predict the natural history and treatment of the lesion.

BENIGN LESION OF BONE one that does not invade surrounding tissue or spread elsewhere in the body. limited capacity for recurrence Recurrence occurs in a non-destructive manner. Surgical resection is often curative

wide variety of behaviours : latent or inactive (e.g. non ossifying fibroma ), active, with a higher risk of recurrence after treatment (e.g.  aneurysmal bone cyst ).

INTERMEDIATE (LOCALLY AGGRESSIVE) LESIONS OF BONE can destroy bone and surrounding tissue (e.g.  osteoblastoma ). often recur and are associated with an infiltrative and locally destructive growth pattern. Recurrence is frequent following limited surgical treatment sometimes en bloc resection is required to completely remove the lesion.

INTERMEDIATE (RARELY METASTASIZING) LESIONS often behave in a similar way to locally aggressive lesions but occasionally demonstrate the ability to spread to distant sites The risk of such spread is <2% Eg : Giant cell tumor of bone

MALIGNANT TUMOURS truly aggressive with the potential for both local extension and metastases to distant sites. The aggressiveness of a tumour is defined by the histological grade. : low grade & high grade Low-grade tumours (e.g. chordoma and parosteal osteosarcoma ) : slow rate of growth and metastases are less common but can arise many years after initial diagnosis.

High-grade  tumours : very high risk of metastasizing, ranging from 20% to 100%, and are locally invasive (e.g. osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma ). Some histologically low-grade lesions have a metastatic rate of only 2–10%, though they may acquire a higher grade at the time of local recurrence and so a higher risk of metastasizing (e.g.   chondrosarcoma ).

ENNEKING CLASSIFICATION

classification of tumours of bone (based on the World Health Organization (WHO) histological classification of tumours ) - 2020

Benign Intermediate Malignant 1. Osteogenic tumours Osteoma NOS Osteoid osteoma NOS Osteoblastoma NOS Low-grade central osteosarcoma Osteosarcoma NOS Parosteal osteosarcoma Periosteal osteosarcoma High-grade surface osteosarcoma Secondary osteosarcoma 2. Chondrogenic tumours Subungual exostosis Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation. Periosteal chondroma Enchondroma Osteochondroma Chondroblastoma NOS Chondromyxoid fibroma Osteochondromyxoma Chondromatosis NOS Atypical cartilaginous tumor Chondrosarcoma , grades 1 Chondrosarcoma , grades 2 Chondrosarcoma , grades 3 Periosteal chondrosarcoma Clear cell chondrosarcoma Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma 3. Fibrogenic tumours Desmoplastic fibroma Fibro sarcoma NOS 4. Giant cell-rich tumours Aneurysmal bone cyst Non-ossifying fibroma Giant-cell tumour NOS Malignant giant-cell tumour 5. Notochordal tumours Benign notochordal tumour Chordoma NOS ( Chondroid chordoma ) Dedifferentiated chordoma Poorly differentiated chordoma

8. Hematopoietic neoplasms of bone Plasmacytoma of bone Hodgkin disease NOS Malignant lymphoma, non-Hodgkin, NOS; Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma NOS; Follicular lymphoma NOS; Marginal zone B-cell lymphoma NOS; T-cell lymphoma NOS; Anaplastic large cell lymphoma NOS; Malignant lymphoma, lymphoblastic, NOS: Burkitt lymphoma NOS Langerhans cell histiocytosis NOS Langerhans cell histiocytosis , disseminated Erdheim -Chester disease Rosai-Dorfman disease 9. Undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas of bone and soft tissue Ewing sarcoma Round cell sarcoma with EWSR1– nonETS fusions CIC-rearranged sarcoma Sarcoma with BCOR genetic alterations Benign Intermediate Malignant 6. Vascular tumours Haemangioma Epithelioid haemangioma Angiosarcoma Epithelioid haemangioendothelioma 7. Other mesenchymal tumors of bone Chondromesenchymal hamartoma of the chest wall Simple bone cyst Fibrous dysplasia Osteofibrous dysplasia Lipoma NOS Hibernoma Osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinoma Mesenchymoma NOS Adamantinoma of long bones (Dedifferentiated adamantinoma ) Leiomyosarcoma NOS Pleomorphic sarcoma, undifferentiated Bone metastases

Common locations of bone tumors

Possible diagnosis based on the radiographic appearances, divided by age group

Osteochondroma - 14 YEAR OLD BOY Sessile or pedunculated lesions SITES : Knee (proximal tibia, distal femur) Proximal femur Proximal humerus Subungal exostoses )

ENCHONDROMA - 65 YEAR OLD FEMALE Well defined, lucent, central medullary lesion “pop-corn” stippling, arcs, whorls, rings hands (60%) > feet distal femur > proximal humerus > tibia Associated conditions : Solitary enchondroma Ollier’s disease (multiple enchondramatosis ) Maffucci’s syndrome (multiple enchondramatosis + soft tissue angioma s )

PERIOSTEAL CHONDROMA – 22 YEAR OLD FEMALE Well demarcated shallow cortical defect Saucerization of underlying bone Proximal humerus (59%), distal femur and proximal femur metacarpals or phalanges

CHONDROBLASTOMA – 18 YEAR OLD MALE Well circumscribed epiphyseal lytic lesion Distal femur and proximal tibia > proximal humerus , proximal femur, calcaneus, flat bones Histology : Chondroblasts arranged in “cobblestone” or “chicken wire pattern”

Chondrosarcoma - 76 year old woman Proximal femur, pelvis, proximal humerus , distal femur, scapula and proximal tibia appear as large, intraosseous , osteolytic tumours with a narrow zone of transition and irregular, granular calcifications within the matrix Endosteal scalloping of the cortex and eventual cortical destruction can occur,

OSTEOID OSTEOMA an area of dense sclerosis with a small, rounded area of osteolysis which is often obscured by the surrounding sclerosis

DESMOPLASTIC FIBROMA - 18 YEAR OLD GIRL most frequently occur in the mandible and pelvis as well as the long bones lytic, expansile lesion within the cortex replaced by a thin shell of new bone

NON OSSIFYING FIBROMA - 25 YEAR OLD MALE Nest of fibrous tissue appears within the bone and persists for some years before ossifying metaphyses of long bones

GIANT CELL TUMOR – 29 YEAR OLD FEMALE affect the metaphyses of long bones with preponderance for the distal femur, proximal tibia, distal radius and proximal humerus eccentric, expansile , lobulated lytic lesion with a narrow zone of transition.

SIMPLE BONE CYST – 10 YEAR OLD BOY proximal humerus , the proximal femur or the proximal tibia, most commonly affecting the metaphyseal areas close to the physis . X-rays demonstrate a welloutlined , Lytic, centrally placed, metadiaphyseal lesion expanding and thinning the cortices

ANEURYSMAL BONE CYST (ABC) – 9 year old boy metaphyses of long bones, particularly the femur, tibia and humerus expansile , lytic, cystic lesion

Fibrous dysplasia – 73 year old male The craniofacial bones, femur, pelvis, and tibia are commonly involved associated with endocrinopathies , and café-au- lait spots, McCune–Albright syndrome, and with intramuscular myxomas in Mazabraud syndrome. non-aggressive well-circumscribed lesion with a characteristic ground-glass matrix proximal femoral fibrous dysplasia - shepherd’s crook deformity

Osteofibrous dysplasia – 15 year old boy typically seen in the anterior cortex of the tibia, particularly in children or teenagers soap bubble appearance.

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) - 8 year old girl Presented with insidious onset of pain in the mid-thoracic spine demonstrate vertebra plana at the level of T6.

osteoblastoma Osteoblastoma of olecranaon demonstrates a lytic lesion, typically 2–5 cm in size

osteosarcoma Codman’s triangle where new bone forms in response to periosteal elevation ‘sunburst’ appearance when the periosteum does not have enough time to lay down a new layer and instead the Sharpey’s fibres stretch perpendicular to the periosteum Metaphyseal or metadiaphyseal , Distal femur, proximal tibia, proximal femur and humerus

Ewing’s sarcoma Pelvis > femur > tibia > humerus > fibula osteolytic lesion with cortical destruction, periosteal reaction with the lamellar ‘onionskin’ appearance

adamantinoma Involves the tibial diaphysis in up to 90% of cases Expansile , soap bubble lesion with permeation into the medullary canal

LIMB SPARING SURGERY (Limb Salvage) Refers to the surgical procedure to restore bone and joint function after extensive resection of malignant bone tumors of the limbs. Maybe performed in more than 85% of Osteosarcomas Consists of 3 phases : a) Resection of tumour b) Skeletal reconstruction (Prosthesis, allograft or arthrodesis) c) Soft tissue and muscle transfers

LSS is performed if: 1. Adequate margin for resection of tumor can be obtained with low risk (<10%) of local recurrence. 2. Functional outcome of the reconstructed limb is better than or comparable to that achieved by amputation and prosthetic fitting.

Principles of Limb Salvage Major neurovascular bundle must be free of tumour Wide resection should be performed of affected bone with normal cuff in all directions All previous biopsy sites and potentially contaminated tissues should be removed en bloc Bone resected 3 to 4 cm beyond abnormal uptake as in bone scan. The adjacent joint and joint capsule should be resected. Extraarticular resection is preferred and is mandatory in the presence of effusion

Tourniquet should be placed proximal to the lesion. Adequate motor reconstruction must be accomplished by regional muscle transfers Adequate soft tissue coverage is needed to decrease the risk of skin flap necrosis and secondary infection Limb salvage can be more aggressively pursued in the upper extremity, where nerve grafting and tendon transfers compensate for loss of major motor nerves

Relative Contraindication to Limb Salvage Major neurovascular structures encased by tumor when vascular bypass is not feasible Pathologic fracture with hematoma violating compartment boundary Inappropriately performed biopsy or biopsy- site complications Severe infection in the surgical field Immature skeletal age with predicted leg length discrepancy > 8 cm Extensive muscle or soft-tissue involvement Poor response to preoperative chemotherapy

Three-strike rule . Out of the four critical structures namely bone reconstruction, soft tissue reconstruction, nerves, soft tissue envelop (coverage) if any three of the structures are limited (central dark area) simultaneously then limb salvage is possibly not worth considering

The various modalities for limb reconstruction used are: Arthrodesis Mobile joint reconstruction – Autoclaved tumor bone – Allograft bone including osteoarticular allograft – Bone transfer (ulna and fibula to reconstruct radius and tibia respectively), Huntington’s procedure – End prosthetic reconstruction –Allograft end prosthetic reconstruction – Custom-made prosthesis – Rotationplasty

rotationplasty

Techniques in association with Limb salvage A) Modular endoprosthesis allows intraoperative flexibility based on the final amount of tissue resected carries a lower risk of deep infection than do allografts, and nonunion is not a concern avoids the risk of disease transmission and immune responses that are associated with allograft use

Early complications : wound necrosis / dehiscence, infection, thromboembolic disease, neuropraxia, and joint instability Late complications : aseptic loosening, infection, joint or prosthetic instability, fatigue, fracture of the prosthesis, and wear or dissociation of modular components

B) Osteoarticular or Bulk Allografts Frozen allografts are most often used Ideal for younger patients as they can limit additional revisions of an end prosthesis Complications : wound related infections, allograft fractures, non union

Various bone grafts in common use for reconstruction after tumor excision. (A) autologous fibula, cancellous bone chips and synthetic calcium phosphate cubes; (B) Morselized allograft; (C) Autoclaved graft from excised tumor

ALLOGRAFT PROSTHETIC COMPOSITE

Surgical margins in lss Primarily based on the relationship of the dissection plane to the tumor and its pseudocapsule .

classified into four types 1. INTRALESIONAL MARGINS (EXCISION) Plane of dissection within the tumor mass removing only a portion of the lesion. Gross tumor and its pseudocapsule (containing satellites), and skip lesions in the surrounding normal tissues are all left behind. suited for benign bone lesions such as simple bone cyst, ABC and enchondroma .

2. MARGINAL MARGINS have dissection plane through the pseudocapsule aiming to remove the lesion en bloc leaves behind the skip lesions and microscopic satellite lesions. suited for less aggressive lesions such as ABC, and GCT.

3. WIDE MARGINS en bloc excision of the lesion where plane of dissection passes outside the reactive zone of the lesion Removes the tumor with its pseudo capsule and cuff of normal tissue. Desired margin for most primary bone sarcomas Leaves behind the skip foci.

4) RADICAL MARGINS involves removing the entire compartment(s) in which the tumor has extended Does not define the true margins of excision Can be “marginal” or a “wide excision” depending on the location of the tumor within compartment and its proximity to borders. If the tumor extends till the border of compartment, this will just be a “marginal excision”.

REFERENCES Campbell’s operative orthopaedics 13 th edition Apley and Solomon’s system of orthopaedics and trauma 10 th edition Differential diagnosis in orthopaedic oncology – 2 nd edition Pubmed central : enneking classification: benign and malignant tumors of the musculoskeletal system. PMC2882012. Pubmed central : Guideline for Limb-Salvage Treatment of Osteosarcoma. PMC7454155 World Health Organization classification of bone tumors (fifth edition): What a radiologist needs to know? Indian Journel of Musculoskelet Radiology 2022;4:73-86

THANK YOU
Tags