Cleft palate

1,945 views 57 slides Oct 13, 2021
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 57
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57

About This Presentation

-


Slide Content

CLEFT PALATE
Asok kumar RS OMFS

INTRODUCTION
Cleft - fissure, split or gap
Congenital abnormality that occurs in the
secondary palate (soft and hard palate). Its
occurrence may be unilateral, bilateral,
complete or incomplete.
Cleft Palate can be non-syndromic or it can
appear as a part of a syndrome or recurrence
pattern.
Cleft of hard palate - deficiency of mucosa and
bone.
Cleft of soft palate - deficiency of mucosa and
hypoplasia of muscles.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

INCIDENCE
Most common congenital deformities of the head and neck.
The incidence varies widely depending on geographic origin, racial and
ethnic group, environmental exposures, and socioeconomic status.
1 in 1,000 births in whites, 1 in 500 births in Asians and Native Americans,
and approximately 1 in 2,400 to 2,500 births in people of African descent
Results from the lack of fusion of the frontonasal and maxillary processes
during the development
Asok kumar RS OMFS

HISTORY
1552 - Dr. Houlier proposed suturing of the palatal clefts.
1564 - Dr. Ambroise Pare used obturators for palatal perforations.
1764 - Le Monnier, a French dentist, attempted the first palate closure.
1816- Dr. Carl Von Graefe was the person to perform the velar repair of
the cleft.
1828 - Dr. Dieffenbach first to close a cleft in the hard palate.
1859 – Dr. Bernhard von Langenbeck, the father of modern-day
palatoplasty performed the bipedicled mucoperiosteal flap for the repair
of a cleft palate.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Veau (1931), Wardill (1937) and Kilner (1937) described the uni-pedicle
mucoperiosteal flap based on the greater palatine artery.
1944 - Dr. Schweckendiek advocated the use of a 2-stage cleft palate
closure.
The soft palate was closed early (4-6 months), with the closure of the hard
palate delayed until 4-5 years.
Done to improve velopharyngeal function during the initial speech
development
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Embryology
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Maxillary process fuse with medial and lateral nasal processes to form upper lip and primary
palate respectively
DEVELOPMENT OF PALATE
Development begins in 6th week
Palate is formed by contribution of
1. Maxillary process
2.Palatal shelves given off by maxillary process
3.Fronto-nasal process
Develops from-
1.Primary palate(from medial nasal process)
2.Secondary palate(from maxillary process)

Asok kumar RS OMFS

Cleft of palate occurs in number of ways:
 Defective growth of palatal shelves
Delayed or total failure of shelves to elevate
and attain a horizontal position
Post fusion rupture of shelves
Failure of mesenchyme consolidation
Asok kumar RS OMFS

ETIOLOGY
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS:
Advanced parental age,
Maternal smoking and alcohol consumption,
Intake of drugs [anticonvulsant (phenobarbital and phenytoin), retinoic
acid) Cortisone/ steroids, Mercaptopurine, Methotrexate, Valium during
pregnancy.
Intrauterine exposure to rubella.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Genes

Transforming growth factors alpha and beta
(TGF alpha, TGF beta 2, TGF beta 3).
Retinoic acid receptor (RAR), the methylene
tetrahydrofolate reductase receptor (MTHFR)
and the folic acid receptor (FOLR1).
MSX-1 and MSX-2.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

ASSOCIATED SYNDROMES
Velo-cardio-facial syndrome,
Treacher Collins syndrome,
 Apert syndrome
Di George syndrome
Van der Woude (AD)
Pierre Robin Syndrome
Goldenhar syndrome
Fetal alcohol syndrome
 Fetal phenytoin syndrome
Fetal valproate syndrome
Asok kumar RS OMFS

CLINICAL MANIFESTATION
Feeding and nutritional problems
Speech problem
Hearing problem and ear infection
Cosmetic problems
Dental problems
Psychological problems
Asok kumar RS OMFS

DENTAL PROBLEMS
Congenitally missing teeth( mostly upper lateral incisors)
 Presence of supernumerary, neonatal and natal teeth
 Ectopically erupted tooth
Enamel hypoplasia
Microdontia, macrodontia
Fused teeth
Gemination, dilaceration
Tendency towards class III skeletal pattern
Posterior and anterior cross bite
Deep bite
Spacing/ crowding
Protruding premaxilla
Asok kumar RS OMFS

ESTHETIC PROBLEMS

 Facial disfigurement
Orofacial structures
can be malformed
and congenitally
missing
Nasal deformity

Asok kumar RS OMFS

CLASSIFICATION
DAVIS AND RITCHIE CLASSIFICATION
Group I- Prealveolar clefts involving only lips.
Unilateral
 bilateral
Median
Group II- Post alveolar clefts that comprises hard and soft palate
clefts upto the alveolar ridge
Group III- Alveolar clefts. Complete clefts involving the palate,
alveolar ridge and lips.
Unilateral
Bilateral
Median
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Kernahan’s stripped ‘Y’ classification
Block 1 and 4 – Lip
 Block 2 and 5 – Alveolus
 Block 3 and 6 - Hard palate anterior to
incisive foramen
 Block 7 and 8 – Hard palate posterior to
incisive foramen
 Block 9 – Soft palate
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

Veau’s classification

Group 1 – Cleft involving soft palate only
Group 2 - Cleft of hard and soft palate
extending upto incisive foramen
Group 3 – Complete unilateral clefts
involving soft palate, hard palate, lips
and alveolar ridge
Group 4 - Complete bilateral clefts
affecting the soft palate, hard palate, lips
and alveolar ridge

a
b
d c
Asok kumar RS OMFS

DIAGNOSIS
Prenatal ultrasound – 2D or 3D
Color Doppler ultrasonography
Asok kumar RS OMFS

ANATOMICAL CONSIDERATIONS
Based on the embryonic origin, the bony portion of the palate is divided into primary and
secondary palates.
The primary palate consists of premaxilla, alveolus, and lip, which are anterior to the incisive
foramen.
The secondary palate includes structures posterior to the incisive foramen, and these are
paired maxilla, palatine bones and pterygoid plates.
The following six muscles have attachment to the palate.
1.Levator veli palatini,
2.Superior constrictor pharyngeus,
3. Musculus uvulus,
4.Palatopharyngeus,
5.Palatoglossus and
6.Tensor veli palatini.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Among these muscles, three muscles that appear to have the greatest contribution to
the velopharyngeal function are levator veli palatini, superior constrictor
pharyngeus and musculus uvulus.
 The levator veli palatini pulls the velum superiorly and posteriorly to oppose the
velum against the posterior pharyngeal wall.

Asok kumar RS OMFS

The medial movement of the
pharyngeal wall, attributed to superior
constrictor pharyngeus, adds in the
opposition against the posterior
pharyngeal wall to form the competent
sphincter

This abnormal insertion contributes to
the overall shortness of the palate and
levator sling cannot be created, may
result in inability of the palate to reach
the posterior pharyngeal wall and
achieve velopharyngeal competence.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
TIMING OF PALATAL CLOSURE
Timing of the surgical repair of lip and palate has been controversial among cleft
surgeons.
 In 1921, Sir Harold Gillies wrote, ‘CLOSE THE LIP EARLY AND REPAIR THE
PALATE PRIOR TO SPEECH’
The ultimate outcome to be aimed for the repair of a cleft palate is the development of
normal speech.
The speech outcome depends on the surgical technique and the timing of the palate
repair.
Performed between 12-18 months.
Ideally, one should consider the development of babbling as an indicator of the time to
reconstruct the palate.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

PRENATAL MEDICAL HISTORY

Familial history with clefts
Evaluation of family members should be undertaken to
assess any genetic factors.
Examination of child for congenital heart disease , limb
and ocular abnormalities
Diagnosis of cleft both syndromic and non syndromic.
PREOPERATIVE CONSIDERATIONS
Asok kumar RS OMFS

CONTRAINDICATIONS FOR CLEFT PALATE REPAIR:

Hemoglobin < 10 gm/dl
Asymptomatic, untreated malaria.
Malnourished children
Central neurologic disorder that prevents speech.
Upper respiratory infections.
Medical comorbidities conferring prohibitive risk as in valvular heart
disease

Asok kumar RS OMFS

GOALS OF CLEFT PALATE REPAIR
Reconstruct velopharyngeal competence.
Restore separation of oral and nasal cavities for improved feeding.
Restore Eustachian tube function
Produce anatomical closure of the defect.
Create an environment favorable for development of normal speech.
Minimize the maxillary growth disturbances and dento-alveolar
deformities.

Asok kumar RS OMFS

SURGICAL TECHNIQUES
Von Langenbeck’s bipedicle flap technique
Veau-Wardill-Kilner Pushback technique
Bardach’s two-flap technique
Furlow Double opposing Z-Plasty
Intravelar veloplasty
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Position of the patient
Supine with neck extended either
by keeping a pillow or a rolled
towel under the shoulder
 A head ring under the occiput
helps in stabilizing the head.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Armamentarium
Cushing forceps
Palate dissector
Cronin Cleft palate elevator
Dingman mouth gag
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Blair periosteal elevator
No.1 Woodson periosteal elevator
Reynolds scissors Kilner scissors
Jeter-Woodson hard palate elevator
Cleft Palate Hook
Asok kumar RS OMFS

von Langenbeck procedure

Bipedicle mucoperiosteal flaps
Incising along the oral side of the cleft
edges and along the posterior alveolar
ridge.
 Mobilize the flaps medially with
preservation of the greater palatine
arteries and close in layers.
Disadvantage: Speech outcome is poor
because of inadequate retroposition
Asok kumar RS OMFS

PALATAL LENGTHENING-V-Y PUSHBACK-VEAU-WARDILL-
KILNER TECHNIQUE

Placing a V to Y incision and closure on the hard
palate.
The muscle closure is done as a separate layer.
 The velopharyngeal function is improved since
there is an increased palatal length.
DISADVANTAGE:
Creates a larger area of denuded palatal bone
anterolaterally and also associated with a higher
incidence of fistula formation
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

INTRAVELAR VELOPLASTY

In 1968 Braithwaite first described the dissection of the Levator Palatini muscle from the
posterior border of the hard palate, nasal and oral mucosa and posterior repositioning
Dissection and freeing of the abnormal attachment of levator palatini muscles and re-
approximation as a midline layer.
Excellent speech outcomes.
Lengthens the palate and
Restores the normal muscular
sling of the levator veli palatini.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Double-opposing Z-plasties-Furlow’s
technique

Different lengthening
procedure of the palate due to
change in position of the velar
and pharyngeal tissues.
 Speech development was
excellent in this technique.
In wide clefts, this type of
closure may not be possible
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

VOMER FLAP
Asok kumar RS OMFS

TWO-FLAP PALATOPLASTY - (BARDACH
AND SALYER-1984)
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

Postoperative management

NPO until 6 post-operative hours or the next day.
Hydration is maintained during this time with intravenous fluid.
Vital signs continuously monitored for 24-48 h.
 Arm splints and Arm restraints were also applied to prevent a child
from disrupting the wound by placing the fingers into mouth.
Oral feeding is initiated by spoon or drinking from cups.
The liquid diet is continued for 7-10 days with solid food to follow

Asok kumar RS OMFS

COMPLICATIONS
IMMEDIATE COMPLICATIONS
1.Haemorrhage
2.Respiratory obstruction
3.Hanging Palate
4.Dehiscence of the repair
5.Oronasal fistula formation
LATE COMPLICATIONS
1.Bifid uvula
2.Velopharyngeal Incompetence
3.Abnormal speech
4.Maxillary hypoplasia
5.Dental malpositioning and malalignment
6.Otitis media
Asok kumar RS OMFS

SECONDARY CORRECTIONS
Closure of palatal fistulae
Palatal fistulae must be considered functional complications related to the type of
primary repair.
The fistula may be present in front of, through or behind the alveolus or in the main
hard palate.
Symptoms
Increased nasalance in speech.
Regurgitation of fluids to the nose.
Halitosis.
Increased incidence of ear and paranasal sinus infections
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

CLOSURE BY TONGUE FLAPS

Asok kumar RS OMFS

CLOSURE BY TONGUE FLAPS
Asok kumar RS OMFS

VELOPHARYNGEAL INCOMPETENCE
Diagnosed as being unable to
raise the velum to meet the
posterior pharyngeal wall to seal
the nasal airway during speech.
Cleft of the soft palate prevent
the muscular action of the palatal
elevators
Presence of a palatal fistula or
fistulae
Submucous cleft palate
Neuromuscular abnormalities
(congenital or acquired)
Asok kumar RS OMFS

HYNES PHARYNGOPLASTY

Asok kumar RS OMFS

CLOSURE OF ALVEOLAR CLEFT

Alveolar bone grafting
The maxilla with cleft has a bony deficiency at the canine-lateral incisor region.
Lack of bone at the anterior maxilla results in:
Lack of bone for permanent canine eruption ..
Unequal distribution of the growth impetus of the premaxillar vomerine suture which leads
to:
a)Premaxillary protrubance and lateral segments collapse.
b)Midfacial growth retrusion.
c)Poor arch forms.
d)Inadequate alveolar bone.

Asok kumar RS OMFS

In order to prevent this ,the bone deficiency can be filled with bone or bone
substitutes. This concept of treatment is called alveolar bone grafting.
Depending upon the timing of this surgery, this treatment has been termed
Primary, Early secondary or Secondary alveolar bone grafting.
a)Primary bone grafting is performed in children younger than 2
years of age.
b)Early secondary bone grafting is performed between 2 and 5 years
of age.
c) Secondary bone grafting is performed greater than 5 years of age.

Asok kumar RS OMFS

SECONDARY ALVEOLAR BONE GRAFTING

Stabilisation of maxillary arch
Closure of vestibular and palatal oronasal fistulae
Provision of bone of sufficient quantity and appropriate
quality for the eruption of permanent canine
Provision of support for the soft tissue nasal base and
reconstruction of the hypoplastic piriform aperture
GOALS OF SECONDARY ALVEOLAR BONE GRAFTING

Asok kumar RS OMFS

Provision of suitable bony architecture of the premaxilla
and anterior face of the maxilla on the cleft side to support
accurate nasolabial muscles reconstruction
Provision of adequate bone stock for ultimate placement
of osseointegrated implant
To provide better periodontal support for teeth bordering
the cleft
Asok kumar RS OMFS

BONE GRAFTING
Bone grafting techniques utilise cancellous bone to promote the formation
of new bone.
Autogenous cancellous bone have an active osteogenic substance that can
produce rapid healing in osseous defects.
Under ideal conditions ,in cancellous bone grafts, early revascularisation is
noted within 1 week and full revascularisation within 3 weeks..
Atraumatic surgical technique, avoidance of heat generation during the
harvesting of the graft and storage of bone particles in a saline soaked
sponge to avoid desiccation are important in maintaining cell viability
before transplantation
Asok kumar RS OMFS

HARVESTING THE ILIAC CANCELLOUS BONE GRAFT.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

SECONDARY ALVEOLAR BONE GRAFTING FOR ALVEOLAR CLEF REPAIR USING
CANCELLOUS ILIAC BONE GRAFT.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

SECONDARY ALVEOLAR BONE GRAFTING FOR ALVEOLAR CLEFT REPAIR USING
rHBMP-2.
Asok kumar RS OMFS

Asok kumar RS OMFS
Tags