Cognitive_Aging_Surprenant_Neath.ppt.ppt

MeghashireeR 19 views 31 slides Sep 25, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 31
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31

About This Presentation

Cognitive aging refers to the natural decline in cognitive abilities as people grow older. This process involves changes in areas such as memory, attention, problem-solving, and processing speed. While some aspects of cognition, like vocabulary and general knowledge, tend to remain stable or even im...


Slide Content

Cognitive Aging
Based on Information in:
Surprenant, A.M. & Neath, I.
in Wilmoth & Ferraro,
Gerontology: Perspectives
& Issues

“…the entire person needs to be considered
in order to develop a comprehensive theory
of cognitive aging” (p. 89).

Cognitive Aging Includes:
Memory
Attention
Language
Intelligence
Brain changes
“everyday functioning in familiar
environments”

Approaches to Studying Cognitive
Aging
Micro (Experimental)
Macro (Psychometric)
Simulation Modeling

Micro (Experimental) Approaches
Focus: “…describing specific tasks &
processes that differ as a fx of age.
Strategy: ID a subtask that can be timed;
present it as a decision-making task and time
the outcome.
Design: Experimental with Age as the
independent variable & Time as the
dependent variable

Macro (Psychometric) Approaches
Focus: “…a broad range of cognitive
processing abilities that vary with age.”
Design: Correlation or Psychometric
techniques.
Goal: To identify commonalities—i.e., “…
fundamental cognitive abilities” that differ
with age.

Simulation Modeling: A recent middle
ground approach
The Advantage: Better deals with the
complexity of the effects of aging on
cognition—many factors, multiples
interactions among them.

Study Designs: Cross-sectional
“…the performance of a group of individuals
from one age range is compared to that of a
group from another age range.”
Easiest to do, but ignores uncontrolled
covariates, e.g. cohort effects, motivation,
health status

Study Designs: Longitudinal
Follows individuals over time, testing them
repeatedly—e.g., The Nuns’ Study; HRS
“…allows researchers to estimate individual changes
in particular abilities rather than inferring changes
based on group differences
Very costly!!!

Meta-Analysis
“…a tool for combining results from multiple
experiments…to determine the true size of
an effect.”

So—What Do We “Know”
About:

Perceptual Deficits
“Both visual & Auditory processing abilities decline
substantially as a fx of increasing age.”
–Presbycusis-1/3 of 0ver-70 adults
–Understanding speech in noise
–“I can’t hear as fast as you talk.”
–Light sensitivity; visual acuity; color vision; contrast
sensitivity.
–Possible Results: Limitation in activity & social function

Memory
A Matter of Great Concern; “…significant
correlations between estimated memory
ability and reports of depression.”
“Older adults perform worse than younger
adults on memory tests in which there are
few environmental cues.” Thus:….

Old people compared to younger--
Worse on Recall tests; Equivalent on
recognition
Worse on Explicit than Implicit tasks
Worse on tasks requiring active information
manipulation and only slightly worse on
measures of simple memory span

Prospective Memory—remembering to
perform some action @ some future
time
Types: Time-based tasks; Event-based tasks
Comparison: O.A. less well on time-based;
no differences in event-based.
Generalization: “Environmental support”
is important for maintaining max cog. Fx.

What About
Intelligence?

Primary Mental Abilities (PMA’s)
Mathematical reasoning
Word fluency and appropriate usage
Verbal meaning/vocabulary level
Inductive reasoning
Spatial relations
Verbal memory (ability to retain/recall info)
Perceptual speed

Types of Intelligence?
Fluid: “tasks that involve quick thinking, info
manipulation, activities involving allocation
and reallocation of attention—rely mainly on
fluid intelligence.
E.g.: tests of memory, spatial relations,
abstract & inductive reasoning, free recall,
mental calculations

Crystallized: “tasks that tap well-learned
stills, language, & retrieval of well-learned
material rely more on crystallized
intelligence.
E.g.: verbal meaning, word association,
social judgement, number skills

Differences with aging?
–Decreases—Fluid Intelligence
–No Decreases (actually some increases)—
Crystallized Intelligence (Salthouse, et al)

Explanation? Some Alternatives:
1) Slowed processing speed
2) Lack of inhibitory control
3) Perceptual processing resources (working
memory capacity) reduction
4) Perceptual processing efficiency reduction

Slowed processing speed:
–Usually measured by reaction times.
–Salthouse argues that decreases in speed
underlie most of the “age-related” declines in cog.
Fxing.
–If so, the question becomes: What causes the
slowing?

Inhibition and Control:
–In short, performance deficits are due to a
difficulty in inhibiting irrelevant information—which
leads to:
–Increased interference &
–Reduced processing resources.

“…the processing account (ala Craik, et al—
mid 80’s) better explains the pattern of data
found in research on cognitive aging” (p. 98)
The Structuralist Tradition vs.
The Processing Approach

Structuralist Tradition:
Purpose of the science of Psych:
–to analyze & describe basic elements of cognition
&
–Discover how they work

Structuralist, cont’d
Development: a process of maturation of
structures in childhood and
Deterioration in late adulthood
Concept: “a partitioning of cognition”.

The Processing Approach—Craik ‘86
Argues in terms of PROCESSES rather than
structures.
Interactional in nature.
Environment Environment
@ encoding @ retrieval
x x
x x
x x
xThe x
x Individual

The combination of the person, the task, and
the environment are all needed to explain
age-related changes in memory.

Declining Sensory Abilities as a
Fx of Aging
“ It is possible that speed in processing slows
because basic input processes result in
impoverished input that then take more time
to identify and interpret.”
Causality? There is a ‘chicken & egg’
problem

Biological Aspects of the Aging Brain
Areas of the Aging Brain—smaller, but not
uniformly so.
Most change in frontal lobe

Can We Improve Cognitive Abilities?
It’s a mixed bag.
Fitness level and cognitive Fx? A highly
qualified “probably”.
P.M. Schwirian. 10/30/08