Compensation & Benefits Management Module 1.pdf

MBA SEM 3 | HR PAPER 3 | COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS MANAGEMENT | MODULE No 1 | JOB EVALUATION | RTMNU MBA | FREE NOTES PDF BY JAYANTI PANDE | ProNotesJRP | MBA Notes | Human Resource Management Specialization

1. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
RASHTRASANT TUKDOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY
MBA
SEMESTER: 3
SPECIALIZATION
HR
SUBJECT
COMPENSATION & BENEFITS MANAGEMENT
MODULE NO : 1
JOB EVALUATION
OR
GRADE STRUCTURE -By Jayanti R Pande

2. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q1. What is Job evaluation?
JOB EVALUATION is a systematic process used by organizations to determine the relative worth or value of each job position
within the company's structure.
It involves assessing and comparing various jobs based on factors such as the complexity of tasks, required skills and
qualifications, responsibilities, working conditions, and the overall contribution of the position to the organization's
objectives.
Job evaluation is a systematic process used to determine the relative worth of each job.
It aims to establish fair pay structures within organizations.
Criteria include tasks, skills, responsibilities, and contributions.
Jobs are compared internally, not against external markets.
Methods such as ranking, classification, point-factor, and factor comparison are used.
Data collection involves gathering job-related information and requirements.
Analysis evaluates job characteristics and requirements.
Scores or values are assigned to jobs based on criteria.
Results are used to determine pay scales, promotions, and career paths.
Benefits include ensuring internal equity, motivating employees, and attracting talent.

3. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q2. What is purpose of job evaluation? What are its advantages and disadvantages?
PURPOSE OF JOB EVALUATION
1.Equity:One of the primary purposes of job evaluation is to ensure equity in compensation. By systematically assessing the
relative worth of different job roles within an organization, job evaluation helps prevent situations where employees
performing similar tasks are paid significantly different salaries.
2.Internal Consistency:Job evaluation establishes a systematic and consistent approach to evaluating jobs within the
organization. This internal consistency is crucial for maintaining fairness and transparency in compensation practices, as it
ensures that similar jobs are evaluated using the same criteria and standards.
3.Motivation:Transparent and fair compensation practices can significantly impact employee motivation and engagement.
When employees perceive that their contributions are accurately recognized and rewarded through job evaluation
processes, they are more likely to feel motivated to perform at their best.
4.Decision Making:Job evaluation provides valuable insights for decision-making processes related to human resource
management. It helps organizations make informed decisions regarding promotions, transfers, career development
opportunities, and other aspects of talent management.
5.Legal Compliance:Ensuring compliance with laborlaws and regulations regarding fair pay practices is another critical
purpose of job evaluation. By implementing systematic job evaluation processes, organizations can demonstrate their
commitment to fair employment practices and mitigate the risk of legal challenges related to unequal pay.

4. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
ADVANTAGES OF JOB EVALUATION
1.Fair Compensation:Job evaluation ensures that each employee is fairly compensated according to the value they bring to
the organization, fostering a sense of fairness and equity in the workplace.
2.Transparency:By providing clear and transparent processes for evaluating jobs and determining compensation, job
evaluation helps build trust among employees, reducing concerns about favoritismor bias.
3.Retention and Engagement:Fair compensation practices, supported by job evaluation, contribute to higher levels of
employee retention and engagement. When employees feel that their contributions are valued and fairly rewarded, they
are more likely to remain committed to the organization.
4.Internal Equity:Job evaluation helps maintain internal equity by ensuring that similar job roles are compensated similarly
across the organization. This consistency in compensation practices promotes a positive organizational culture and reduces
potential sources of internal conflict or dissatisfaction.
5.Strategic Alignment:By aligning compensation with organizational goals and objectives, job evaluation supports strategic
initiatives such as attracting and retaining top talent, promoting a performance-driven culture, and enhancing
organizational competitiveness in the marketplace.

5. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
DISADVANTAGES OF JOB EVALUATION
1.Complexity:Implementing and maintaining job evaluation systems can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring
careful planning, extensive data collection, and ongoing evaluation to ensure effectiveness.
2.Subjectivity:Despite efforts to make job evaluation processes objective, there is always a degree of subjectivity
involved, which may introduce biases and inconsistencies, undermining the perceived fairness of the results.
3.Resistance:Employees may resist perceived unfair outcomes of job evaluation processes, leading to challenges in
acceptance and implementation, and potentially affecting morale and productivity.
4.Cost:Developing and sustaining job evaluation systems can be costly, requiring investments in terms of time,
resources, and expertise, which may pose financial challenges for organizations.
5.Inflexibility:Job evaluation systems may lack flexibility to adapt to changes in organizational structures, job roles, or
market conditions, necessitating regular review and adjustment to ensure relevance and accuracy over time.

6. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
1 Identify Jobs for Evaluation
2 Gather Relevant Data
3 Determine Job Ranking
4 Selection of Benchmark Jobs
5 Salary and Wage Surveys
6 Review and Feedback
Q3. Explain the process of Job Evaluation.
PROCESS OF
JOB EVALUATION

7. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
PROCESS OF JOB EVALUATION
1.Identify Jobs for Evaluation:The first step in the job evaluation process is to identify which jobs within the organization will
be evaluated. This typically involves compiling a list of all job positions and determining which ones are relevant for
evaluation based on factors such as their importance, impact on organizational objectives, and frequency of occurrence.
2.Gather Relevant Data:Once the jobs for evaluation have been identified, the next step is to gather relevant data about each
job. This may include job descriptions, responsibilities, required skills and qualifications, reporting relationships, and any
other pertinent information that will help assess the value of the job within the organization.
3.Determine Job Ranking:After collecting data for each job, the next step is to determine the ranking or hierarchy of jobs
within the organization. This can be done using various job evaluation methods, such as the ranking method, where jobs are
ranked from highest to lowest based on their perceived value or importance to the organization.
4.Selection of Benchmark Jobs:Benchmark jobs are key reference points used in job evaluation to compare and evaluate other
jobs within the organization. These benchmark jobs are typically well-defined and widely understood roles that represent
different levels of complexity, responsibility, and skill. Selecting appropriate benchmark jobs is crucial for ensuring the
accuracy and reliability of the job evaluation process.
5.Salary and Wage Surveys:Conducting salary and wage surveys is an important part of the job evaluation process. These
surveys provide valuable data about prevailing market rates for different job roles, which can be used to benchmark the
organization's pay scales against industry standards. This information helps ensure that the organization remains
competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
6.Review and Feedback:Finally, the job evaluation process should include a review stage where the results are reviewed and
validated. This may involve seeking feedback from key stakeholders such as managers, employees, and HR professionals to
ensure that the evaluation outcomes accurately reflect the organization's needs and objectives. Additionally, providing
feedback to employees about the outcomes of the job evaluation process can help promote transparency and
understanding within the organization.

8. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q4. What are different methods of Job Evaluation?
Ranking System
Non-Analytical Methods Analytical Methods
Grading System
(Job Classification)
Factor Comparison
Method
Point Ranking
Method
METHODS OF JOB EVALUATION

9. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Non-Analytical Methods:
Non-analytical methods of job evaluation do not involve detailed analysis or quantification of job factors. They rely on overall
judgments and comparisons to determine job worth.
1.Ranking System:In the ranking system, jobs are evaluated based on their overall worth or value to the organization relative to one
another. Jobs are ranked from highest to lowest based on predetermined criteria such as skill requirements, responsibilities,and
complexity. This method is relatively simple and straightforward but may lack precision, especially in larger organizations with
diverse job roles.
2.Grading System (Job Classification):The grading system, also known as job classification, involves grouping jobs into predefined
categories or grades based on predetermined criteria such as skill levels, responsibilities, and qualifications. Each grade represents
a range of job values, allowing for easier comparison and administration of compensation. This method provides a structured
approach to job evaluation and is commonly used in organizations with clearly defined job hierarchies.
Analytical Methods:
Analytical methods of job evaluation involve a more detailed and systematic analysis of job factors to determine job worth.
1.Factor Comparison Method:The factor comparison method is a complex analytical approach to job evaluation. It involves
identifying key factors such as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions that contribute to job value. Jobs are then
evaluated based on these factors, and a monetary value is assigned to each factor. The total value of a job is determined by
summing the values assigned to each factor. This method provides a more detailed and precise evaluation of jobs but requires
extensive data collection and analysis.
2.Point Ranking Method:The point ranking method is another analytical approach to job evaluation that involves assigning points to
various job factors such as skill, effort, responsibility, and working conditions. Each job is then rated based on these factors, and a
total point score is calculated. Jobs are ranked or classified based on their total point score, with higher scores indicating jobs of
greater value. This method allows for a more systematic and objective evaluation of jobs but requires careful definition and
weighting of job factors.

10. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q5. Write about implementations of Job Evaluation.
IMPLEMENTATIONS OF JOB EVALUATION
1.Establishing Fair Compensation:Job evaluation ensures that employees are fairly compensated based on the value of
their roles within the organization. By implementing job evaluation, organizations can ensure that compensation
practices are equitable and aligned with the contributions of employees.
2.Promoting Internal Equity:Through job evaluation, organizations can establish a clear hierarchy of job roles and
ensure that similar positions are compensated appropriately. This promotes internal equity and reduces potential
sources of conflict or dissatisfaction among employees.
3.Supporting Career Development:Job evaluation provides a basis for identifying skill and competency requirements
for different job roles. This information can be used to develop career paths and progression opportunities within
the organization, helping employees understand how they can advance in their careers.
4.Enhancing Organizational Performance:By aligning job roles and compensation with organizational goals and
objectives, job evaluation can contribute to improved performance and productivity. Employees are motivated to
perform at their best when they feel that their contributions are recognized and fairly rewarded.
5.Attracting and Retaining Talent:Fair and transparent compensation practices supported by job evaluation can
enhance the organization's ability to attract and retain top talent. When employees perceive that their contributions
are valued and fairly compensated, they are more likely to remain committed to the organization.

11. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q6. What is ranking system ? Explain about Job Classification.
Ranking System:
•The ranking system is a non-analytical method of job evaluation where jobs are compared based on their overall value to
the organization.
•Jobs are typically ranked from highest to lowest based on criteria like skill requirements, responsibilities, and importance
to organizational objectives.
•It's a subjective process where evaluators use job descriptions and other relevant information to assess job significance.
While simple to implement, it may lack precision and objectivity compared to analytical methods.
Job Classification (Grading System):
•Job classification, also known as the grading system, involves grouping jobs into predefined categories or grades based on
criteria such as skill levels and responsibilities.
•Each grade represents a range of job values, with higher grades usually indicating more complex or senior-level positions.
•This method provides structure for determining salary ranges, promotions, and career paths, making it suitable for
organizations with clear job hierarchies.
•However, it may oversimplify job roles and requires careful maintenance to ensure consistency and fairness. Despite its
limitations, job classification is popular due to its simplicity and practicality.

12. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q7. Write about Graded Salary Structure. What are it’s advantages and disadvantages?
A GRADED SALARY STRUCTURE, also known as a salary grade system, is a method used by organizations to group jobs into predefined
salary ranges or grades based on factors such as job responsibilities, skills required, and level of experience. Each grade represents a
range of salaries, with higher grades typically associated with more senior or complex positions.
ADVANTAGES OF GRADED SALARY STRUCTURE
1.Transparency and Consistency:A graded salary structure provides transparency in how salaries are determined within an
organization. By categorizing jobs into grades based on predetermined criteria, employees can understand how their salary
compares to others in similar roles. This consistency fosters a sense of fairness and equity among employees.
2.Simplicity in Administration:Graded salary structures simplify the administration of compensation practices within an organization.
Instead of individually negotiating salaries for each position, HR departments can apply standardized salary ranges for each grade,
streamlining the compensation process and reducing administrative burden.
3.Facilitates Career Progression:A graded salary structure provides a clear framework for career progression within the organization.
As employees gain experience and skills, they can advance to higher salary grades, providing a tangible incentive for professional
development and advancement.
4.Internal Equity:By aligning salaries with job grades based on factors such as responsibilities and skill levels, graded salary structures
promote internal equity. Employees in similar roles are compensated comparably, reducing the likelihood of resentment or
dissatisfaction within the workforce.
5.Attracts and Retains Talent:Clear salary progression paths outlined in a graded salary structure can attract and retain top talent.
Employees are motivated to stay with the organization when they see opportunities for advancement and corresponding increases
in salary as they progress through the grades.

13. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
DISADVANTAGES OF GRADED SALARY STRUCTURE
1.Limited Flexibility:Graded salary structures may lack flexibility to accommodate individual differences in skills,
experience, or performance. This rigidity can lead to situations where highly skilled or high-performing employees feel
undervalued if they are constrained by the salary range of their grade.
2.Risk of Compression:Over time, a graded salary structure can lead to salary compression, where the salary differences
between employees in different grades diminish. This can occur if salary increases are applied uniformly across all
grades, rather than reflecting changes in market rates or individual performance.
3.Potential for Discontent:Employees may perceive graded salary structures as restrictive, especially if they feel that their
contributions are not adequately reflected in their assigned grade. This perception can lead to discontent and
demotivation among employees, particularly if they believe that advancement opportunities are limited within their
current grade.
4.Complexity in Implementation:Designing and implementing a graded salary structure requires careful consideration of
job roles, skill levels, and market conditions. Developing clear criteria for assigning jobs to grades and establishing
appropriate salary ranges can be a complex and time-consuming process.
5.Market Competitiveness:Graded salary structures may struggle to remain competitive in rapidly changing market
conditions. If salary ranges become outdated compared to industry standards, organizations may face challenges in
attracting and retaining top talent, leading to talent drain and decreased competitiveness.

14. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q8. What is Computerised Job Evaluation?
COMPUTERIZED JOB EVALUATION refers to the use of computer software and technology to automate the job evaluation
process within an organization. Instead of relying solely on manual methods such as paper-based assessments or spreadsheets,
computerized job evaluation systems utilize specialized software to streamline and enhance the evaluation process.
These systems typically involve the following components and functionalities:
Job Database:Computerized job evaluation systems maintain a centralized database of job descriptions, job factors, and
other relevant information for each position within the organization. This database serves as a repository for all job-related
data and ensures consistency and accuracy in the evaluation process.
Evaluation Algorithms:The software employs predefined algorithms or mathematical models to assess the value of each job
based on factors such as skill requirements, responsibilities, and qualifications. These algorithms may be customizable to
accommodate the specific needs and preferences of the organization.
Scoring and Ranking:Computerized job evaluation systems assign scores or rankings to each job based on the evaluation
criteria and algorithms. This allows for objective and standardized assessments of job worth, reducing the potential for bias
or subjectivity in the evaluation process.
Integration with HR Systems:Many computerized job evaluation systems are integrated with other HR systems such as
payroll, performance management, and talent management software. This integration enables seamless data exchange and
ensures that job evaluation outcomes are effectively utilized in other HR processes.
Reporting and Analytics:Computerized job evaluation systems provide robust reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing
organizations to generate detailed reports, graphs, and dashboards to visualize evaluation results. This enables HR
professionals and organizational leaders to gain insights into compensation trends, internal equity, and workforce planning.

15. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q9. Write a note on Factor Comparison Method.
The Factor Comparison Method is an analytical approach used in job evaluation to determine the relative value of different jobs within an
organization. This method is based on the idea that jobs can be evaluated by comparing them across a set of key factors or dimensions that
contribute to their worth. These factors typically include aspects such as skill requirements, responsibilities, working conditions, and
qualifications.
FACTOR COMPARISON METHOD STEPS
1.Identify Key Factors:The first step in the Factor Comparison Method is to identify the key factors that are relevant to evaluating job roles
within the organization. These factors are typically chosen based on their importance to the organization's objectives and theirimpact on job
performance.
2.Assign Monetary Values:Once the key factors are identified, monetary values are assigned to each factor based on their relative importance.
This is typically done through a process of negotiation and consensus among a panel of evaluators or experts familiar with the organization's
job roles and requirements.
3.Evaluate Jobs:Jobs are then evaluated based on the presence and extent of each factor. Evaluators assess how each job compares to others
in terms of the factors identified, considering factors such as the level of skill required, the degree of responsibility, and the working
conditions associated with each job.
4.Calculate Total Job Value:The total value of each job is calculated by summing the monetary values assigned to each factor. This provides a
quantitative measure of the job's overall worth relative to other jobs within the organization.
5.Rank Jobs:Finally, jobs are ranked or classified based on their total job value. Jobs with higher total values are considered more valuable or
important to the organization, while those with lower values are ranked accordingly.
ADVANTAGES
•Precision:By breaking down job roles into specific factors and assigning monetary values to each factor, the Factor Comparison Method
provides a precise and detailed evaluation of job worth.
•Flexibility:This method allows organizations to tailor the evaluation process to their specific needs and priorities by selecting and weighting
factors according to their relevance.
•Comparability:Jobs can be compared across different departments or organizations using the same set of factors, for consistent evaluation.

16. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q10. Describe Packaged Point Plans in detail.
PACKAGED POINT PLANS are a type of job evaluation method used by organizations to assess and determine the relative value
of different job roles within the company. This method is based on assigning points to various job factors and then aggregating
these points to calculate the total value of each job. Packaged point plans are called "packaged" because they come with
predetermined point values for each factor, which are typically standardized and provided by a third-party vendor or consulting
firm.
STEPS
1.Identifying Job Factors:The first step in implementing a packaged point plan is to identify the key factors that are relevant to
evaluating job roles within the organization. These factors typically include elements such as skill requirements,
responsibilities, working conditions, and qualifications.
2.Assigning Point Values:Once the key factors are identified, predetermined point values are assigned to each factor based on
their perceived importance to the organization. These point values are typically provided by the vendor or consulting firm
that offers the packaged point plan and are based on industry standards and best practices.
3.Evaluating Jobs:Jobs are then evaluated based on the presence and extent of each factor. Evaluators assess how each job
compares to others in terms of the factors identified, considering factors such as the level of skill required, the degree of
responsibility, and the working conditions associated with each job.
4.Calculating Total Point Scores:The total point score for each job is calculated by summing the points assigned to each factor.
This provides a quantitative measure of the job's overall worth relative to other jobs within the organization.
5.Ranking or Classifying Jobs:Finally, jobs are ranked or classified based on their total point score. Jobs with higher total point
scores are considered more valuable or important to the organization, while those with lower scores are ranked accordingly.

17. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Q11. Write a short note on Point System.
A POINT SYSTEM is a method used by organizations for job evaluation, where points are assigned to various job factors to determine
the relative value of different job roles within the organization. This system involves breaking down jobs into specific factorssuch as skill
requirements, responsibilities, working conditions, and qualifications, and assigning numerical values (points) to each factor based on its
importance or contribution to the job.
STEPS
1.Identifying Job Factors:The first step in a point system is to identify the key factors that are relevant to evaluating job roles within
the organization. These factors are chosen based on their importance to the organization's objectives and their impact on job
performance.
2.Assigning Point Values:Once the key factors are identified, numerical values (points) are assigned to each factor based on their
relative importance. These values are typically determined through a process of consensus among a panel of evaluators or experts
familiar with the organization's job roles and requirements.
3.Evaluating Jobs:Jobs are then evaluated based on the presence and extent of each factor. Evaluators assess how each job compares
to others in terms of the factors identified, considering factors such as the level of skill required, the degree of responsibility, and
the working conditions associated with each job.
4.Calculating Total Point Scores:The total point score for each job is calculated by summing the points assigned to each factor. This
provides a quantitative measure of the job's overall worth relative to other jobs within the organization.
5.Ranking or Classifying Jobs:Finally, jobs are ranked or classified based on their total point score. Jobs with higher total point scores
are considered more valuable or important to the organization, while those with lower scores are ranked accordingly.
One of the key advantages of a point system is its objectivity and consistency. By assigning numerical values to job factors, organizations
can ensure that the evaluation process is based on clear and standardized criteria, minimizing biases and inconsistencies. Additionally,
point systems provide a systematic approach to job evaluation, making it easier to compare and benchmark jobs within the
organization.

18. Copyright © 2024 Jayanti Rajdevendra Pande. All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2024 Jayanti RajdevendraPande.
All rights reserved.
Thiscontentmaybeprintedforpersonaluseonly.Itmaynotbecopied,distributed,orusedforanyother
purposewithouttheexpresswrittenpermissionofthecopyrightowner.
Thiscontentisprotectedbycopyrightlaw.Anyunauthorizeduseofthecontent,includingbutnotlimitedto
plagiarism,reproductionforsale,distributionwithoutpermission,oruseinacademicdishonestysuchas
cheatingonexams,isstrictlyprohibitedandmayresultinlegalaction.
Furthermore,nopartofthiscontentmaybealtered,modified,orusedtocreatederivativeworkswithoutprior
writtenconsent.
Pleasenote:Thecopyrightownerisnotliableforanyissuesorcomplicationsarisingfromtheprintingoruseof
thismaterial.Additionally,anyattempttocopyorpostthismaterialonlinewithoutpermissionisaviolationof
copyrightlawandmayresultinlegalconsequences.
Foranyfurtherqueriescontactonemail:[email protected]