Classification
(Gustilo & Anderson, 1976 )
Type I Puncture wound, clean
Type II Laceration
No tissue loss or
contamination
Type III extensive damage &contamination
a ) soft tissue cover possible
b ) soft tissue recon –flaps / graft
c ) added arterial injury
Type I –most deceptive !
puncture wound, clean
Type II
Laceration >1cm
No tissue loss, skin flaps
or
contamination
Type IIIa
extensive damage &contamination
a ) soft tissue cover possible
Type IIIb –soft tissue
recon
Soft tissue loss
Periosteal stripping
Bone exposure
Type IIIc, most challenging
…when in doubt amputate !
Management @ site
Stop haemorrhage
-pressure
Clean wound
-plenty of water
Cover with clean cloth
Splint
Do not try to push fragments into
the limb !
Case study
12yr old boy
RTA,
run over
by
school bus
Irrigate with water
in OT,
6-10
liters
…excise all dead tissue
Skin,
muscle,
tendons &
bone
…to this !
Soft tissue cover : groin flap
External fixation
Stabilise # from outside
Compound fractures
Risk of infection reduced
Soft tissue reconstruction
Ex Fix -types
Pin and Rod assemblies
Dynamic axial fixator
Ilizarov ( ring ) Fixator
Pin and Rod assemblies
Schanz pins
Rods
Clamps
Uniplanar
Multiplanar more
stable
Ex Fix : principles
For a stable construct
-2 pins as close to # as possible
-proximal & distal pins as far as
possible
-rod close to limb
-rod to rod connectors will
strengthen assembly
Ilizarov ( ring ) Fixator
GA Ilizarov
Kurgan
Ouch ! …
Ilizarov ( ring ) Fixator
principle –bone loss
Ilizarov, case study
Dynamic axial fixator
Clamps on a rail
Stable
Versatile
-compression
-distraction
-fragment
transport
DAF cont’d
Hybrids
Combine ext & Int
fixations
Soft tissue cover
Reconstructive ladder
“ the Ortho Plastic approach”
Split skin grafts
Local flap
Distant flap
Free tissue transfer
Skin grafts
Split skin graft
( Thriesh )
do not include
dermis
Full thickness
( Wolff )
Local flaps
Muscle
Myocutaneous
Faciocutaneous
needs SSG
Distant flaps
Cross leg flap
Groin flap
Free flaps
Tissue harvested with artery &
venae commitentes
Skin & facia / muscle / composite
Anastomosis at recipient site
Microvascular technique
Philosophy :
function before ego !
Epiphyseal injuries
Children
Weakest point is the physis
Growth disturbance
Classification ( Salter Harris )
Type 1 –transverse thru plate
Type 2 –with triangular
metaphyseal fragment
Type 3 –split in physis and
goes along the plate
Classification ( Salter Harris )
Type 4 –splits physis
extends to metaphysis
Type 5 –crushing of growth plate
Course
Types 1 & 2 no disturbance
3 may grow normally
( early recognition and reduction )
4 & 5 high risk of growth arrest