Computational Chemistry: A DFT crash course

ssuserc04644 45 views 20 slides Sep 29, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 20
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20

About This Presentation

DFT


Slide Content

Computational Chemistry:
A DFT crash course

Useful Material
Books
A chemist’s guide to density-functional theory
Wolfram Koch and Max C. Holthausen (second edition,
Wiley)
The theory of the cohesive energies of solids
G. P. Srivastava and D. Weaire
Advances in Physics 36 (1987) 463-517
Gulliver among the atoms
Mike Gillan, New Scientist 138 (1993) 34
Web

www.nobel.se/chemistry/laureates/1998/

www.abinit.org
Version 4.2.3 compiled for windows, install and good
tutorial

Outline: Part 1,
The Framework of DFT
DFT: the theory

Schroedinger’s equation

Hohenberg-Kohn Theorem

Kohn-Sham Theorem

Simplifying Schroedinger’s

LDA, GGA
Elements of Solid State Physics

Reciprocal space

Band structure

Plane waves
And then ?

Forces (Hellmann-Feynman theorem)

E.O., M.D., M.C. …

Outline: Part2
Using DFT
Practical Issues
Input File(s)
Output files
Configuration
K-points mesh
Pseudopotentials
Control Parameters
LDA/GGA
‘Diagonalisation’
Applications
Isolated molecule
Bulk
Surface

The Basic Problem
Dangerously
classical
representation
Cores
Electron
s

Schroedinger’s Equation
 
iiii
rRrRV
m
,.,
2
2






 

Hamiltonian operator
Kinetic Energy
Potential Energy
Coulombic interaction
External Fields
Very Complex many body Problem !!
(Because everything interacts)
Wave function
Energy levels

First approximations
Adiabatic (or Born-Openheimer)

Electrons are much lighter, and faster

Decoupling in the wave function
Nuclei are treated classically

They go in the external potential

iiii
rRrR .,

H.K. Theorem
The ground state is unequivocally
defined by the electronic density
rrrdvFE
v 
 
Universal
functional
•Functional ?? Function of a function
•No more wave functions here
•But still too complex

K.S. Formulation
Use an auxiliary system
Non interacting electrons
Same Density
=> Back to wave functions, but simpler this time
(a lot more though)
 rrV
m
iiieff
 .
2
2










rr
rr
r
rr 

XCeff
dVV 



 
i
i
2
rr
N K.S. equations
(ONE particle in a box really)
(KS3)
(KS2)
(KS1)
Exchange correlation
potential

Self consistent loop
Solve the independents
K.S. =>wave functions
From density, work out
Effective potential
New density ‘=‘
input density ??
Deduce new density from
w.f.
Initial density
Finita la musica YES
N
O

DFT energy functional





XCNI
EdddvTE 


 
rr
rr
r
rrr
2
1
Exchange correlation
funtional
Contains:
Exchange
Correlation
Interacting part of K.E.
Electrons are fermions
(antisymmetric wave function)

Exchange correlation
functional
At this stage, the only thing we need is:
XC
E
Still a functional (way too many variables)
#1 approximation, Local Density Approximation:
Homogeneous electron gas
Functional becomes function !! (see KS3)
Very good parameterisation for 
XC
E
Generalised Gradient Approximation:
 ,
XCE
GGA
LDA

DFT: Summary
The ground state energy depends only
on the electronic density (H.K.)
One can formally replace the SE for the
system by a set of SE for non-interacting
electrons (K.S.)
Everything hard is dumped into E
xc
Simplistic approximations of E
xc work !
LDA or GGA

And now, for something completely
different:
A little bit of Solid State Physics
Crystal structure Periodicity

Reciprocal space
Real Space
a
i
ijji
ba .2
Reciprocal Space
b
iBrillouin
Zone
(Inverting effect)
k-vector (or k-point)
sin(k.r)
See X-Ray diffraction for instance
Also, Fourier transform and Bloch theorem

Band structure
Molecul
e
E
Crystal
Energy
levels (eigenvalues
of SE)

The k-point mesh
Brillouin
Zone
(6x6) mesh
Corresponds to a
supercell 36 time bigger
than the primitive cell
Question:
Which require a finer
mesh, Metals or Insulators
??

Plane waves
Project the wave functions on a basis set
Tricky integrals become linear algebra
Plane Wave for Solid State
Could be localised (ex: Gaussians)
+ + =
Sum of plane waves of increasing
frequency (or energy)
One has to stop: E
cut

Solid State: Summary
Quantities can be calculated in the
direct or reciprocal space
k-point Mesh
Plane wave basis set, E
cut

Now what ?
We have access to the energy of a
system, without any empirical input
With little efforts, the forces can be
computed, Hellman-Feynman theorem
Then, the methodologies discussed for atomistic
potential can be used
Energy Optimisation
Monte Carlo
Molecular dynamics

 rrrF dv
iii
Tags