Congenital clubfoot

ssuser9d2329 2,643 views 29 slides Feb 13, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 29
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

Congenital Clubfoot ( Talipes equinovarus ) Yasser Alwabli

Introduction – definition Developmental deformity of foot described as: Equinus Inversion (HF varus ) Cavus (FF pronation) Adduction

Introduction – definition

Epidemiology 1-2 in 1000 50% bilateral, Boys 2X Associations (20%) - SP, CP, AG ? DDH (Paton RW, 2009) Family studies: 30% in identical twins, one parent 3-4% and two parents 30%

Etiology Many theories: Mechanical, neuromuscular, vascular deficiencies Polygenic multifactorial trait AD with incomplete penetrance Environmental – early amniocentesis, maternal smoking Genetic – PITX1 gene

Pathoanatomy Talocalcaneonavicular (TCN) joint dislocation with soft tissue contractures

Soft tissue contractures Cavus  (tight intrinsics , FHL, FDL) Adductus  (tight tibialis posterior) Varus  (tight tendoachilles , tibialis posterior) Equinus  (tight tendoachilles )

Clinically Small foot Small calf Tibia - shortened Medial and posterior foot skin creases Foot deformities: Hindfoot - Equinus + Varus Midfoot -   Cavus Forefoot - Adduction

Imaging Antenatally – US X-Rays – not routinely done Views - AP and lateral in stress dorsiflexion. On AP view: Talocalcaneal angle (30-55˚) and the talo -first metatarsal angle (5-15˚ ). Lateral view: Talocalcaneal angle (10-40˚) and the tibiocalcaneal angle ( 10-20˚). Hindfoot parallelism All of these angles are decreased.

Classification - Pirani’s classification system ( Pirani et al, 1995)

Classification - Dimeglio classification ( Dimeglio et al, 1995)

Classification - Dimeglio classification ( Dimeglio et al, 1995)

Classification - Dimeglio classification (Dimeglio et al, 1995)

Treatment – Ponseti technique Since 1950 POSNA members – 96.7% (2010) Success rate – 90% Timing – first weeks of life Serial casting (average 4-5 casts) Long leg cast Dennis brown bar Achilles tenotomy – 70%

Dennis brown bar

Treatment – Ponseti technique

Treatment - French technique 74% success rate Daily manipulation by physiotherapist followed by immobilization with adhesive taping to maintain the correction achieved with stretching.  Daily for 2 months then 3/week till age 6 months. If successful in achieving correction, parents continue both the home exercises and night splints until the child reaches walking age.

Treatment – surgical options Posteromedial soft tissue release : Resistant cases Delayed presentation Syndrome-associated clubfoot M edial opening or lateral column-shortening osteotomy, or cuboidal decancellation – older children 3-10 years Tripe arthrodesis – refractory cases Talectomy – salvage procedure

Complications With nonoperative treatment: Relapse Dynamic supination With operative treatment: Residual cavus Pes planus Intoeing gait Dorsal bunion
Tags