Corynebacterium

102,421 views 60 slides Apr 12, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 60
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60

About This Presentation

Corynebacterium diphtheria


Slide Content

CO RYNEBACTERI UM A Presentation By G. Prashanth Kumar Department of Microbiology & Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, International Medical & Technological University, Dar- Es -Salaam, Tanzania .

INTRODUCTION Corynebacteria / “ Coryneform bacteria” – a group of non-spore forming, gram- positive bacilli, tend to be clubbed or irregularly shaped; ( coryne = club) Corynebacterium diphtheriae the causative agent of Diphtheria is the major pathogen in this group . Other pathogenic corynebacteria are: C. Ulcerans : Diphtheria like lessions . Corynebacteria Causing Superficial skin infections: C. minutissimum and C. tenuis . Diphtheriods : Normal commensals in throat, skin and conjunctiva.

HISTORY Hippocrates provided the first clinical description of diphtheria in the 4th century B.C. Bretonneu (1821), a French army surgeon, described the unique clinical characteristics of the disease, and used the term ‘ dipht`erie ’ to signify the tough leathery pseudomembrane that occurs in oropharynx and some times in nasopharynx; ( diphtheros = leather)

HISTORY The bacterium that caused diphtheria was first described by Klebs in 1883 , and was cultivated by Loeffler in 1884 , who applied Koch's postulates and properly identified Corynebacterium diphtheriae as the agent of the disease. In 1884 , Loeffler concluded that C. diphtheriae produced a soluble toxin , and thereby provided the first description of a bacterial exotoxin. Roux and Yersin (1888) discovered the diphtheria exotoxin and established its pathogenic effects. The antitoxin was described by von Behring(1890).

CORYNEBACTERIUM DIPHTHERIAE

MORPHOLOGY Slender Gram-positive rods, pleomorphic ; easily decolousised ; 0.6-0.8 μ diameter and 3-6 μ length; Irregular swelling at one or both ends (‘club shaped’); Non-capsulate, Non- sporing and nonmotile Granules containing polymetaphosphate are seen in the cells; Take up bluish purple color against lightly stained cytoplasm, when stained with Loeffler’s Methylene Blue, and hence called ‘Metachromatic granules ’; Also called, ‘ volutin granules’ or ‘Babes Ernst granules’; They are often situated at poles- ‘polar bodies’

MORPHOLOGY Special stains for demonstrating the granules : Albert’s stain Neisser’s stain Ponder’s stain The bacilli are arranged in pairs, palisades or small groups; the bacilli lie at various angles to each other, resembling the letters, V or L; This is called, “Chinese letter pattern” or “cuneiform pattern”;

CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS Aerobe and facultative anaerobe; Optimum temperature is 37 C Growth scanty on ordinary media; Enrichment with : blood, serum or egg is necessary for good growth; Potassium tellurite (0.04 %) acts as a ‘selective agent’, as it inhibits growth of most oral commensals and retards the growth of Candida albicans and S.aureus ;

MEDIA FOR CULTIVATION Blood agar Loeffler’s serum slope Tellurite blood agar Hoyle’s tellurite lysed-blood agar Tinsdale’s medium ( cystine added to tellurite containing agar)

COLONY CHARACTERISTICS Blood agar : small, granular and gray with irregular edges; Hemolysis may or may not present; Loeffler’s serum slope: Very rapid growth; Colonies in 6-8 hrs Initially circular white opaque colonies and acquire yellowish tint on incubation

COLONY CHARACTERISTICS Tellurite blood agar: Growth slow; colonies seen after 48 hrs ; The colonies are brown to black with a brown-black halo because the tellurite is reduced to metallic tellurium; Staphylococcus also produce such colonies A diagrammatic representation

COLONY CHARACTERISTICS Tinsdale’s medium (also contain cystine in addition to tellurite ): Grey black colonies with dark brown haloes indicate C.diphtheriae and C.ulcerans (these contain cystinase )

BIOTYPES McLeod and Anderson classified diphtheria bacilli, b ased on the colony characteristics on Tellurite medium and other properties like biochemical reactions and severity of disease; 3 biotypes : gravis intermedius mitis 4 th biotype : belfanti has also been described

Feature gravis intermedius mitis Morphology shot rods, few granules some degree of pleomorphism long barred forms poor granulation Pleomorphism long curved prominent granules Pleomorphism Colony on tellurite blood agar (48 hrs ) Daisy head colony (flat colony with raised dark centre and crenated edge; radial striations) Frog's egg colony (dull granular centre with glistening periphery and lighter ring near edge) Poached egg colony (shiny , flat with central elevation) Consistency of the colonies Brittle not easily emulsifiable intermediate soft, buttery easily emulsifiable Hemolysis Variable nonhemolytic hemolytic Glycogen/ starch fermentation Positive Negative Negative

OTHER FEATURES OF VARIOUS BIOTYPES The gravis and mitis are associated with high case fatality rates; Paralytic complications more with gravis ; Hemorrhagic complications – gravis and intermdius ; Obstruction to air passage - mitis mitis – endemic ; gravis and intermedius -epidemic

BIOCHEMICAL REACTIONS Hiss serum sugars – for testing fermentation reactions; Ferment- glucose, galactose , maltose and dextrose ; but not lactose, sucrose, mannitol; Proteolytic activity is absent; Do not hydrolyse urea; Do not form phosphatase; Produce cystinase (halo on Tinsdale’s medium)

RESISTANCE Cultures remain viable for 2-3 wks at 25-30 C Destroyed by heat Resistant to light, desiccation or freezing; Easily destroyed by antiseptics Susceptible to – Penicillin, erythromycin and broad spectrum antibiotics ;

ANTIGENIC STRUCTURE AND TYPING Serotyping : Antigenically heterogenous gravis: 13 types intermedius : 4 types mitis : 40 types Bacteriophage typing : 15 types Bacteriocin typing : diphtheriocin typing

VIRULENCE FACTORS Virulent strains of diphtheria bacilli produce a very powerful exotoxin. The ‘virulence’ of diphtheria bacilli is due to their capacity to- Establish infection and growing rapidly Quickly elaborate an exotoxin Avirulent strains are common among convalescents , contacts and carriers, particularly those with extra- faucial infection

DIPHTHERIA TOXIN The pathognomonic effects are due to the toxin; Almost all the gravis and intermedius strains and 80-85% of mitis strains are toxigenic Toxin is a protein; Mol. Wt.: 62,000 Two fragments, A and B; Extremely potent : 0.1 μ g lethal to guinea pig Inactive when released

Toxin – mechanism of action Fragment B : binds to a cell surface receptor and helps in transport of toxin into the cell; After entering the cell, A subunit is released ; A subunit catalyses the transfer of ‘adenosine diphosphate ribose (ADPR)’ from NAD+ ADPR binds with the elongation factor EF 2 “ADPR-EF2” complex is inactive  protein synthesis stops abruptly  necrotising and neurotoxic effects of the toxin;

PATHOGENICITY Commonest site of infection: Upper respiratory tract (fauces, larynx,nose) Ocassionally, other cutaneous or mucocutaneous areas ( otitic/conjunctival/ genitovulval/vaginal/ prepucial/skin) Faucial diphtheria is the commonest type; Sore throat is frequently the presenting symptom;

PATHOLOGY After infection, the bacilli multiply on the mucous membrane or skin abrasion; The toxigenic strains start producing toxin; Diphtheria is a ‘toxemia ’; The bacteria confine to the site of entry but the exotoxin is absorbed into the mucus membrane and causes destruction of epithelium and a superficial inflammatory response;

PATHOLOGY The toxin causes local necrotic changes; The resulting fibrinous exudate, together with the epithelial cells, leucocytes, erythrocytes and bacteria constitute : “pseudomembrane” Any effort to remove it will tear off capillaries beneath it and cause bleeding; Mechanical complications are due to pseudomembrane and systemic effects are due to the toxin;

Toxin-systemic absorption The bacilli continue to produce the toxin; The toxin is absorbed systemically and damages heart muscle, liver, adrenals etc .; The toxin also cause nerve damage , especially of soft palate(palatine) and eye muscles (ciliary); Toxin absorption is negligible in case of skin infection with toxigenic strains; Nontoxigenic strains can also produce local disease but systemic effects are absent;

CLINICAL DISEASES Incubation period : usually 3-4 days; Acute infection : in the form of – Membranous tonsillitis Nasal infection Laryngeal infection Skin infection –uncommon;

CLINICAL DISEASES Characteristic feature is : ‘wash –leather’ eleveted greyish greeen membrane in the tonsils with a well defined edge surrounded by a zone of inflammation;

‘wash –leather’ eleveted greyish greeen membrane in the tonsils Pseudomembrane

CLASSIFICATION BASED ON CLINICAL SEVERITY Malignant or hypertoxic: ‘Bull neck’ due to marked adenitis in neck; Severe toxemia Circulatory failure Death Paralytic squealae in survivors Septic : ulceration, cellulitis and gangrene around pseudomembrane; Hemorrhagic: bleeding from the edge of pseudomembrane, epistaxis, purpura etc.

Bull neck : due to cervical adenitis and edema of neck

COMPLICATIONS Asphyxia : due to mechanical obstruction Emergency tracheostomy may be necessary; Acute circulatory failure Myocarditis Postdiphtheritic paralysis- palatine(soft palate) and ciliary ( eye muscles) nerves Recovery – spontaneous and complete Septic : pneumonia and otitis media Relapse : in about 1% of cases

LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS This is to confirm the clinical impression and for epidemiological purpose; Specific treatment must never be delayed for laboratory reports, if the clinical picture is strongly suggestive of diphtheria; Any delay may be fatal…! Laboratory diagnosis consists of the isolation of the organism and demonstration of it’s toxicity;

LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS Specimens : Swabs from – nose, throat or other suspected lesions; Smear examination: Gram stain shows beaded rods in typical arrangement; Difficult to differentiate from some commensal corynebacteria normally found in throat; Albert’s stain or Neisser’s stain is useful for demonstrating the granules;

Numbers of large-sized Gram-positive rods are embedded within the pseudomembrane (Gram). LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS

LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS : CULTURE If the swabs can not be inoculated promptly, they should be kept moistened with serum; Inoculate on : Loeffler’s serum slope Tellurite blood agar or Tinsdale medium Blood agar ( for differentiating Staphylococcal or Streptococcal pharyngitis that simulate diphtheria); Tellurite medium is particulary useful for isolating the organism from – convalescents, contacts or carriers;

LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS : CULTURE Processing : Serum slope may show growth in 4-8 hrs but if negative may need to be incubated for 24 hrs ; Smear may show ‘diphtheria-like’ organisms; By about 48 hrs , Tellurite plates will yield growth; The isolate must be submitted for – ‘Virulence tests’ or ‘ Toxigenicity tests’ before the bacteriological diagnosis is complete;

VIRULENCE TESTS In vivo methods: Subcutaneous test Intracutaneous test In vitro methods: Elek’s gel precipitation test Tissue culture test

SUBCUTANEOUS TEST Emulsify the growth form an overnight culture of Loeffler’s serum slope in 2-4 ml broth 0.8 ml injected subcutaneously Into two guinea pigs Protected with 500 IU of antitoxin 18-24 hrs previously Unprotected Die in 4 days if the strain is Virulent; autopsy shows Characteristic features Remain healthy Disadvantage : Death of the animal Control animal Test animal

INTRACUTANEOUS TEST 0.1 ml of emulsion broth inoculated intracutaneously in to two guinea pigs Control animal Test animal Should receive 500 IU Of antitoxin previous day Give 50 IU of antitoxin Intraperitoneally 4 hrs after skin test (To prevent death) Inflammatory reaction Progress to necrosis in 48-72 hrs NO CHANGE

INTRACUTANEOUS TEST Animal does not die; Rabbits may also be used; As many as 10 strains can be tested simultaneously;

Elek’s gel precipitation test In vitro test; A rectangular strip of filter paper is saturated with the diphtheria antitoxin(1000 units/ml); This strip is placed on : agar plate with 20% horse serum, while the medium is setting; The cultures to be tested are streaked at right angles to the filter paper strip; A positive and negative control should be put;

Incubate the plate for 24-48 hrs at 37 C P T N

After incubation – line of precipitation can be observed Where the toxin and antitoxin meet at optimum conc. The lines of precipitation will indicate that the test strain is toxigenic P T N

Tissue culture test Bacteria incorporated into an agar overlay of cell culture monolayers; The toxin, if produced, diffuses into the cells below and kills them ;

EPIDEMIOLOGY Mainly a disease of childhood(pediatrics) in endemic areas – uncommon below 1 st year; peaks at 5. In nature, C.diphtheriae occurs in the respiratory tract, in the wounds or in the skin of the infected persons or carriers; Transmission is by- Droplet dissemination from cases or carriers Direct contact Occasionally, fomites ; Nasopharyngeal or cutaneous carriage of toxigenic or nontoxigenic strains can persist for life in healthy people;

PROPHYLAXIS Diphtheria can be controlled by immunisation; Types of immunisation available for diphtheria: Active Passive combined The objective of immunisation is to increase protective levels of antitoxin in circulation;

Active immunisation Emil von Behring initiated immunisation for diphtheria in children in 1913 using toxin –antitoxin mixtures; (TAT) These preparations were hazardous; Danysz phenomenon: if the equivalent amounts of toxin and antitoxin were mixed all at once, the final preperation was nontoxic. But, if the same amount of toxin was added in instalments, the resultant mixture was toxic; In 1929, Ramon introduced ‘toxoid’.

Active immunisation - toxoid s Two preparations of toxoid are available: Formol toxoid Adsorbed toxoid Formal toxoid : prepared by incubating the toxin with formalin for 3-4 weeks; Adsorbed toxoid : purified toxoid is adsorbed onto an adjuvant, either aluminium phosphate or aluminium hydroxide; this is more immunogenic;

Active immunisation - toxoids Adsorbed toxoid –given as IM injections Recommended vaccines: As a trivalent preperation : DPT (adsorbed Diphtheria/Pertusis/Tetanus) Adsorbed Diphtheria/Tetanus (DT) Adsorbed low dose diphtheria vaccine for adults (d) Adsorbed Tetanus/low dose diphtheria vaccine (Td ) for adults; A quadraple vaccine containing DPT+inactivated polio vaccine is also available;

Active immunisation - schedules Primary immunisation : 3 doses of DPT begening at 4 th week of age, 8 th and 12 th week under Routine Immunization schedule(Govt . of Tanzania ) Booster (DPT) at 15-18 months of age; Further booster, as ‘DT’ at – 5 years of age ; Dosage : 0.5 ml 10-25 Lf units of toxoid - recommended for children

Active immunisation - schedules Contraindications: Acute febrile illness : postpone till recovery Severe local or systemic reaction to pertusis component of DPT are likely; if they occur, immunise with DT; acellular pertusis vaccine can be added if the reaction is a local one;

Passive Immunisation Using antitoxin or ADS(Antidiphtheritic serum); As an emergency measure when susceptibles are exposed to infection; Subcutaneous administration of 500-1000 units of antitoxin or ADS(Antidiphtheritic serum); Risk of hypersensitivity as horse serum used; Historical engraving showing how the medicinal serum was obtained from immunized horses.

Combined immunisation Administration of first dose of toxoid on one arm, while ADS is given on the other arm, to be continued by full course of active immunisation; All cases that received prophylactic ADS should receive combined immunisation;

TREATMENT Specific measure : prompt administration of antitoxin to neutralize the circulating toxin; Dose: 20,000-1,00,000 units Half the dose given IV Antitoxin treatment is generally not indicated for cutaneous diphtheria Antibiotics : Penicillin or Erythromycin for 14 days ; Complete bed rest; Supportive therapy and treatment of complications Erythromycin: for treatment of carriers.

OTHER CORYNEBACTERIA

C.ULCERANS Resembles gravis biotype of C.diphtheriae Liquify gelatin, ferment trehalose slowly, does not reduce nitrates; Produce two types of toxins ; Guinea pigs: lesions similar to those of C.diphtheirae ; Cause infection in cows ; Human infections may be transmitted through cow’s milk; Diphtheria antitoxin is protective ;

OTHER CORYNEBACTERIA Arcanobacterium ( C.hemolyticum ): pharyngitis and skin ulcers C.jakeium : cutaneous and blood stream infections in immunocompromised ; multi resistant; C.pseudotuberculosis : Preisz Nocord bacillus Pseudotubeculosis in sheep and lymphadenitis in horses; C.minutissimum : Erythrasma , affecting axilla and groin C.tenuis : pigmented nodules around axillary and pubic hair shafts. C.parvum : an immunomodulator agent

DIPHTHEROIDS Resemble C.diphtheriae and mistaken for them; Common commensals of nose, throat, nasopharynx, skin , urinary tract and conjunctiva Produce no exotoxin ; Stain more uniformly, few or no metachromatic granules and tend to be arranged in palisades; Can produce disease in immunocompromised ; Have been isolated in infections such as endocarditis of prosthetic valves, lung abscess and UTI; Sensitive to Vancomycin ; Ex. C.pseudodiphtheriticum – throat C.xerosus : conjunctival sac
Tags