D2-Trends and Framework for Flexible Learning R5 - Copy.PPTX

module

1. Primary Questions: Does the flexible learning environment improve student learning? What mode of flexible learning is appropriate for Filipino college students? How does the flexible learning improve teachers instructional performance?

2. Framework for flexible learning OTL (Utah Valley University, Southeast Missouri State University) A1: Vision A2: Instructional Design A3: Institutional expertise A4: Policy and infrastructure A5: Analytics A6: Quality Assurance A7: Strategic Campaigns A8: Student Success A9: Faculty Development and Recognition A10: Shared governance A11: Shared understanding

3. CHED R7 Content Development Capacity building Technology Infrastructure Monitoring and Evaluation Policy Development CHED Committee Aspects of the framework Content Development Instructional design Capacity building Institutional expertise Technology Infrastructure Student success, instructional design, infrastructure Monitoring and Evaluation Analytics, quality assurance, shared understanding Policy Development Vision, policy and infrastructure, strategic campaign, faulty development and recognition, shared governance

4. A1: Vision Which part of the Mission, Vision, goals and directives of CHED rationalizes the use of flexible learning? Does CHED current policy support the use of flexible learning? What is indicated in the policy and guidelines?

5. A2: Instructional Design Curriculum: What important learning outcomes will be taught? Are there priority outcomes for each program? What are the priority learning outcomes? Instruction: Connection among the LO, course activities, teaching strategies, resources and assessment. Web design: learners interact with the content, teacher and other learners. The instructional design is reflected well in the web design/modules.

6. A2: Instructional Design Teaching and Facilitation: