Damage control in orthopaedics

2,219 views 28 slides Sep 26, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 28
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28

About This Presentation

damage control in orthopaedics


Slide Content

Damage control in orthopaedics Dr.sunil

Damage control orthopaedics(DCO)is a strategy that focuses on managing and stabilising major orthopaedic injuries in selected polytrauma patients who are in an unstable or extremis physiological state. Its priorities are – - control of haemorrhage , - provisional stabilisation of major skeletal fractures, -management of soft-tissue injuries - minimising the degree of surgical insult to the patient

TWO-HITS THEORY .First Hit ( Trauma ) – Hypoxia – Hypotension – organ & soft tissue injury – fractures  Second Hit (operation) – ischemia/reperfusion injury – compartment syndrome – operative intervention – infection

Stage 1: early temporary External Fixation Stabilization of unstable fractures and the control of hemorrhage and, if indicated, decompression of intracranial lesion. Stage 2: resuscitation of the patient in ICU optimization of his condition. Stage 3: delayed definitive management of the fracture

Physiological response to injury Inflammatory immune response Innate immune response Adaptive immune response Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) Compensatory Anti-inflammatory Response Syndrome (CARS) Multi Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) pathophysiology

v

SIRS DEFINITION  Heart rate: > 90 bpm  WBC: <4000/mm3 or >12000/mm3 or >10 %  Respiratory rate: >20/min with PaCO2<32mmHg  Core temperature: <360C or >380C 2 of 4 parameters = SIRS

• IL-6 reliable index of the magnitude of systemic inflammation and correlates with the outcome(n=3.2 pg/ml) • IL-10 correlate with the initial degree of injury and persistently high levels of IL-10 correlate with sepsis .(n =< 18 pg/ml)

Patient Selection for Damage Control Orthopaedics Patients who have sustained orthopaedic trauma are divided into : a)Stable - local preferred method b)Borderline - damage control orthopaedics often preferred c ) Unstable - damage control orthopaedics d)In extremis - damage control orthopaedics

Stable hemodynamics No need for inotropic stimulation No hypoxemia,no hypercapnia Lactate < 2mmol/l Normal coagulation Normothermia Urinary output>1 ml/kg/h Indications for early total care

1)Blunt trauma: - hypothermia,coagulopathy , shock/blood loss,soft tissue injury 2)Penetrating trauma:-hypothermia , coagulapathy,acidosis 3)Complex pattern of severe injuries-expecting major blood loss and a prolonged reconstructive procedure in physiologically unstable patient Indications for damage control in orthopaedics

Injury complexes suitable for damage control orthopaedics

Femoral Fracture Femoral fractures in a multiply injured patient are not automatically treated with intramedullary nailing because ‘second hit ’ fat emboli Patients with a chest injury are most prone to deterioration after an intramedullary nailing procedure because of fat emboli syndrome Bilateral femoral fracture is associated with a higher mortality rate and incidence of adult respiratory distress syndrome than is a unilateral femoral fracture

 Cerebral - Cerebral edema CVS - Hypotension and shock Respiratory - Acute lung injury, ARDS  Liver - hepatocytes dysfunction Renal - Renal tubular necrosis, acute renal failure Hematologic - DIC MODS

Pelvic Ring Injuries Excessive haemorrhage associated with pelvic fracture Conditions where haemorrhage can be expected, when there is pelvic injury : -Posterior pelvic ring injuries -Anterior-posterior compression type III injuries, lateral compression injuries -Pelvic fracture in patients over 55 years old

What is done ? Minimally invasive pelvic stabilisation - Pelvic binder - External fixator - Pelvic c-clamp • Angiography and embolisation Indications : 1.Initial treatment of pelvic fractures associated with hypotension that have not responded to the placement of a pelvic binder, external fixator , pelvic cclamp , and transfusion of four units or more of blood

2. expanding retroperitoneal hematoma, 3 . a massive retroperitoneal hematoma observed on Embolisation later than 3 hours after injury increased risk of mortality -Average procedure time is 90 minutes Pelvic Packing Indication :- . Patient with severe hypotension and a pelvic fracture that is unresponsive to other initial treatment measures , associated with imminent risk of death

Chest Injuries Treatment of multiply injured patients with long bone fractures and a chest injury: early fracture stabilisation (within 48 hours)is safe and may be beneficial

Head Injuries • Early stabilisation doesn’t enhance or worsen the outcome in patients with head injury management • Based on the individual clinical assessment and treatment requirements Damage control orthopaedics can provide temporary osseous stability to an injured extremity, functioning as a temporary bridge to staged definitive osteosynthesis , without worsening the patient's head injury or overall condition. • Aggressive management of intracranial pressure • Maintenance of cerebral perfusion pressure at >70 mmHg and intracranial pressure at <20 mm Hg

Isolated Complex Lower-Extremity Trauma Proximal tibial articular and metaphyseal fractures , metaphyseal fractures, distal tibial pilon fractures Useful for preventing soft-tissue complications by spanning the articular segment with an external fixator and avoiding areas of future incisions . Then minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis can be performed at a stage when the condition of the soft tissue envelope is optimized.

When can secondary orthopaedic procedures be performed? Days 2, 3 and 4 are not safe ( marked immune reactions and increased generalised oedema ) Days 6 to 8 less risk

Thank you
Tags