Dean r berry fallacy appeal to ignorance

deanberrybruin 2,548 views 19 slides Jul 10, 2018
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 19
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19

About This Presentation

Great


Slide Content

Logical Fallacies: Appeal to Ignorance

Free PowerPoint Version at Slideshare.com Type PPT title or dean r berry

Appeal to Ignorance A Common Core Lesson By Dean Berry, Ed. D. Gregg Berry, B. A. Common Core Curriculum Solutions

Reading with Your Eyes and Your Brain Skillful readers learn how to read persuasive or opinionated text with a very critical eye. They realize that the author’s purpose is to convince the reader to believe what the author is saying and to consider the arguments given as valid even if they violate logical reasoning and lack supporting evidence. The author’s motive may be to get the reader to buy something, vote a certain way, change an attitude, or behave differently.

In order to avoid manipulation by the author, good readers learn how to detect poor reasoning and faulty arguments . They are able to identify the various logical fallacies such as begging the question, strawman, overgeneralization, slippery slope, and others. During this lesson, we will study logical fallacies.

Lack of information or ignorance is not evidence that something must be true.

Ignoring logic doesn’t make an argument valid.

Appealing to ignorance is not an acceptable substitute for proof.

Appeal to Ignorance Such an argument assumes a proposition to be true simply because there is no evidence proving that it is not . Thus, absence of evidence proving that something is false is accepted as proof that the opposite must be true. . Similarly, when we did not know how the pyramids were built, some concluded that, unless proven otherwise, they must have therefore been built by a supernatural power or aliens from outer space. However, to be scientific and evidence based, the burden-of-proof always lies with the person making the claim.

Is this a logical fallacy? Why? Why Not? In spite of all the talk, not a single flying saucer report has been authenticated. We may assume, therefore, there are not such things as flying saucers.

Appeal to Ignorance A specific form of the appeal to ignorance is the argument that stems from a person's inability to imagine that an event could be possible and therefore is not believable. For example,  It is impossible to imagine that we actually landed a man on the moon, therefore it never happened.  Responses of this sort are sometimes wittily countered with, That's why you're not a nuclear scientist .

Is this statement a logical fallacy? Why? Why Not? “ You can’t prove that there aren’t Martians living in caves somewhere on Mars, so it is reasonable for me to believe there are living creatures on mars.

Is this a logical fallacy? Why? Why Not? Since you cannot prove that ghosts do not exist, they probably do exist.

Appeal to Ignorance

Is this statement a logical fallacy? Why? Why Not?

Is this a logical fallacy? Why? Why Not? No one has conclusively proven that there is no intelligent life on the moons of Jupiter. Therefore, there must be intelligent life on the moons of Jupiter.

What kind of logical fallacy is this? Why do you think so?

Pair Share Meet in pairs or small groups and write one sentence claims that are based on a total lack of facts and evidence. Use the following topics as possible ideas for your claims. Write three claims and discuss what type of evidence would be adequate to support such an argument. Extra terrestrial life Mental telepathy Born lucky September 11 terrorist attack Ghosts

Was this guy willing to seek solutions to the problem of high gas prices? Why do you say that?