Ecological Systems Approach Originally developed by psychologist Urie Bronfenbrenner (1979), ecological systems theory explains human development by describing aspects of the individual, the environment, and the interaction between the two. Ecological systems theory argues that people are actively involved in their own development (versus some developmental theories that argue that people are passive—they do not play an active role in their development) and their environments and that both development and environments are always changing ( Brandell , 1997).
Tenets A fundamental tenet of ecological systems theory is that the way people perceive their environments and experiences significantly affects their well-being. Specifically , the meaning that people place on the things that happen to them and the way they interpret these events in the context of their environments have a major impact on how these events influence their well-being ( Mullaly , 1997 ) . All people have transactions, or positive and negative exchanges, with others. For example, a positive exchange would be when a person receives praise or money for doing good work. A negative exchange might occur when a child is scolded for not sharing toys.
Cont. People are actively engaged in their environments, they receive and expend energy in the form of inputs and outputs . To maintain health and well-being, people must be able to adapt to changes in their environments. Because, according to ecological systems theory, people and their environments are always changing, adaptation is a significant issue . It is concerned with the interdependence of people with others and their environments. In the context of their environments, people have a mutually reliant relationship in which each depends on the other for growth and development.
levels/classes Ecological theory contains several levels that describe factors within a person’s environment that are significant in development. The theory describes levels of the environment which are: Microsystem Mesosystem Exosystem Macrosystem chronosystem
M icrosystem The microsystem consists of all the roles and relationships that a person has in the immediate environment. Closest to the person, have direct control /impact This level contains physical places such as home, school, work , daycare and the neighborhood; these are places where people have daily face-to-face contact with one another . Hence, it typically includes family, peers or care givers
Microsystems Cont. Relationships are bi-directional/ two way i ,e bi-directional One’s reaction to the people in the microsystem will affect how people treat you in return Examples parent-child relationship, a child witnessing abuses
Mesosystem The mesosystem focuses on the interactions among two or more environmental settings in which people live. To put it another way, the mesosystem comprises a system of microsystems. e.g parent subsystem, sibling subsystem For example, the dynamics in a person’s work and home lives often impact one another; this is exemplified when a person brings home the tensions from her work.
Exosystem The exosystem consists of all of those social settings (for example, child’s school, parent’s workplace, neighborhood community center) in which things happen that affect people indirectly e.ga child being affected by the parents non- payment of salaries, work transfer affecting children . Although the person is not necessarily an active participant in these settings, what happens in them will impact the person directly or indirectly.
Cont. An example is policy decisions about school closures in a community. Though residents of the community are not involved in making these decisions, their children and families are affected by them. Some families may decide to move to another school district or bus their children to a school that is far away. Residents who do not have children will experience the impact of community change created by the decisions.
Macrosystem The macrosystem refers to all the ways in which larger cultural factors affect the other levels of a person’s environment and, consequently, how they affect a person’s development. This includes aspects such as laws, political philosophy, and religious and cultural beliefs. Societal attitudes against gay marriage, laws prohibiting it, and resulting discrimination in benefits (such as health care for a partner) are examples of how issues in the macrosystem can play out and affect individuals.
chronosystem Transitions and shifts happening in life E.g death of parents, divorce of parents
Wide Application The ecological systems theory (EST) finds application across a number of fields – from classrooms, to immigrant support services, to helping underprivileged children. EST can even be applied to the corporate world by, for instance, helping companies innovate through the use of the ecological systems theory. Such an approach, as outlined by Costello & Donnellan (2011) views innovation in a business setting as an ecosystem with internal and external components, rather than in isolation.
Provides Actionable Inputs Unlike many other theories in the social sciences, the ecological systems theory provides credible actionable inputs that can translate to public policy action implemented for the betterment of society. For instance, the recommendations of the theory have been used to design community support services in the US and elsewhere.
Weaknesses Difficult To Test Empirically Vaguely Understood Systems
Difficult To Test Empirically While the application of the ecological systems theory in practice has yielded tangible positive outcomes, it is not always clear that such outcomes were, in fact, caused by the application of the ecological systems theory.
Vaguely Understood Systems Several aspects of the theory such as the mesosystem and the chronosystem remain vaguely defined and understood. For instance, the mechanism(s) through which the components of the mesosystem such as the family, school, friends, etc. interact with each other to affect a child’s development are not clearly understood (Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2000).
REFERENCES Brandell , J. R. (Ed.). (1997). Theory and practice in clinical social work. New York: The Free Press. Costello , G.J., & Donnellan, B. ( 2011) An Ecological Perspective on Innovation Management Conference: Making a World of Difference: Nation Building and the Role of Management Education. Mullaly , B. (1997). Structural social work: Ideology, theory and practice (2nd ed.). Toronto, Canada: Oxford University Press. Leventhal , T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: the effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 309.