Essay Science And Religion

Religion vs. Science Essays
Religion vs. Science Essay
Essay on Science vs. Religion

1. Religion vs. Science Essays
Religion vs. Science
The human mind is easily convinced on what the eyes tell the mind. If you see something in front
of yourself, you might have an easier time believing, than if one was to tell a story. Religion is a
story that has been told for thousands of years, and not till technology has ripened have scientists
disproved many beliefs. It is now that mankind lets religion restrain the mind from portraying the
truth about life. Some people claim that science does not have all of the answers when it comes to
the business of life. They are right. Science is less a body of "facts" than it is is a method of
establishing claims about the universe. Claims, which can be tested and measured, reviewed and
evaluated....show more content...
population"(n.y.times4/12/88), believes that these supernatural people exist, running errands for
God, or helping people in time of need. This whole belief system is a throwback to earlier times in
human history, when the world was enchanted, populated with mystical and religious entities of all
sorts (Greek Gods for example). Its existence today is a shadow land of beliefs, which co–exist with
our more enlightened views about the universe. For most people, their view of the world rests with
one foot in consciousness and the other ignorance. One of the more curious artifacts of supernatural
belief is so–called Scientific Creationism. A quest to balance the mind's interpretations of the
Judeo–Christian Bible with the findings of modern science. Decades after the famous "Monkey trial"
which debated the pros and cons of evolutionary discovery, we are still repeating this argument in the
nation's public schools. The evolution on–creation debate which now rages in the United States,
and elsewhere is tied to other issues. This includes prayer in schools, and indeed the role of
religious instruction in the classroom and other civic institutions. It is also a highly charged,
emotional debate. Creationists see evolution as part of a larger agenda aimed at religious belief
itself. In a peculiar way, they may well be correct. But as with any debate, we should weigh the
evidence and examine these raw facts as
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

2. Religion vs. Science Essay
Religion vs. Science
This paper will examine the scientific view verse religion. I feel their support for the big picture is
shallow and untenable. I believe in science but I also have faith. Scientific research has lead to
dramatic and more humane treatments of persons suffering from mental disease, depression, and
physical injury. The reputation of scientists has reached an all–time high. Majority of Americans
have said they trust the scientific community more than almost anyone, including the Supreme
Court, organized religion, Congress, teachers and the U.S. military. Many of these Americans
believe that these scientific advances are leading them to a better world. The questions: What is
man? What am I to do?...show more content...
Raymo viewed humans as the universe becoming conscious of itself through evolution, while prayer
consists of miracles, and giving praise and thanksgiving to nature. (National Review p32) Scientists
begin to worship their own concepts, proclaiming limitless philosophical systems rather than
concentrating on what the data is really showing. Scientists cannot prove that known natural forces
can produce complex biological organisms. No one has demonstrated that chemical evolution cannot
even begin to account for the information content of the simplest organisms. There is no actual
evidence of natural selection having substantial creative power. The only examples available are
those of variations in fundamentally stable populations. In scientific perspective, molecular
revolution has revealed an unforeseen domain of complexity and interaction more consistent with
technology than with the mechanical viewpoint. Scientist have come to realize that cells thoroughly
protect themselves against the kinds of accidental genetic change that, according to conventional
theory, are the sources of evolutionary variability. The current knowledge of genetic change is
fundamentally at variance with hypothesis held by neo–Darwinists. Everyone is in search of the
their truth. Understanding, the very rich and varied world, in which we live, the need for these
insights of
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

3. Essay on Science vs. Religion
Religion versus science, the debates and conflicts have been on for centuries. For both religious
and scientific ideals, the faith people have drives them. In this paper, I will examine the story of
"The Eye of Apollo" by G.K. Chesterton, and the episode "House vs. God" of House, M.D., in order
to question this conflict. The main character–Father Brown–in "The Eye of Apollo" combines his
reasoning with his religious ideals and beliefs, or we can say his faith in God leads him to the truth
of the crime. However, if we try to have a deeper look at the both the rational and religious sides of
Father Brown, his perspectives on the immortality and justice are similar to Dr House, who interprets
his rationality based on science. Thus both the...show more content...
Father Brown finally points out the truth that Kalon kills Pauline with his setup based on Miss
Stacey being blind in order to get her money. Miss Pauline's sister, Joan Pauline, is also part of the
crime according to Father Brown, who has also taken advantage of her sister's blindness and played
trick on the will. We can easily find Father Brown's interpretation about "truths". People apparently
will recognize him as a rational and religious person who is a skeptic of pure "sciences", however,
not necessarily the scientific methodology. Upon learning the new religion mentioned by Flambeau,
Father Brown holds his doubts about the religion of Apollo: he doubts seriously on whether "it
can cure the one spiritual disease". Father Brown actually has found Kalon is the murderer before
he learns what is the tragedy. As he says: "there came a crash and a scream down the street, and
the priest of Apollo did not start or look around... I know that he was expecting it" (The Eye of
Apollo). This kind of distrust as presented by him conveys his skeptical approach to things. Father
Brown's skepticism for and tendency to reject the Apollo religion reflect his belief: the pure science
and the new religion are both considered as superstitions. On the other side, the reasons lying
behind the crimes, according to Father brown, are driven by the inner desires of human, or we can
say, it is the "devil" that made
Get more content on HelpWriting.net