Ferrous alloys upto DP steels from NIT Rourkela.pdf

vaibhavemailone 4 views 29 slides Sep 16, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 29
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29

About This Presentation

NIT Rourkela 2025
4th year MM


Slide Content

Subject Code: MM4161
Course Instructor: Dr.SrijanAcharya
Assistant Professor
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering,
National Institute of Technology Rourkela
Complex Ferrous and Non-ferrous Alloys

Classification of steels
Steels
Low Alloy
Low
Carbon
Plain
carbon
High Strength Low Alloy
Medium
Carbon
High
Carbon
High Alloy
Tool steels
Stainless
steels
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering
An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.

Ferrous alloys : Fe-C phase diagram
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.

Ferrous alloys Recap : Fe-Fe3C phase diagram
Salient features:
Equillibrium diagram (thermodynamic); does not say about
kinetics (effect of time)
Effect of C on phase stability
Solubility of C in different phases
Invariant reactions
Eutectoid (γ α + Fe3C)
Eutectic (L γ + Fe3C)
Peritectic (L + δ γ)
Steel side (up to ≈ 2.11 wt.% C) and cast iron side (beyond
2.11 wt.% C )
Ac3 (γ γ + α) and Ac1 (γ α + Fe3C) lines
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles” by Robert E. Reed-hill
0.02 %

Solubility of C in α and γ: role of interstitial void size
Octahedral
FCC
BCC
Tetrahedral
Source: “Steels: Microstructure and Properties ” by Sir HKDH Bhadeshia and Sir R. HoneyKombe

Solubility of C in α and γ: role of interstitial void size
Octahedral
FCC
BCC
Tetrahedral
Source: “Steels: Microstructure and Properties ” by Sir HKDH Bhadeshia and Sir R. HoneyKombe
➢C has higher solubility in γ due to larger sizes of octahedral
interstitial sites in FCC-γ
➢In BCC, C occupies octahedral site despite it being smaller than
tetrahedral site
➢For in octahedral interstices movement of 2 nearest-neighbour
Fe atoms is required.
➢For tetrahedral interstices, 4 Fe atoms are of nearest-neighbor,
hence their displacement needs more strain energy.

Recap: The Eutectoid Reaction
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.

The equilibrium phases in steels at RT
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
At Eutectoid composition i.e. 0.77 wt.% C:
Pearlite (lamellar mixture of eutectoid ferrite and cementite)
Hypo-eutectoid composition i.e. <0.77 wt.% C:
Proeutectoid ferrite (transformed from γ along Ac
3 )
Pearlite (transformed from γ along Ac
1 )
Hyper-eutectoid composition i.e. >0.77 wt.% C:
Proeutectoid cementite (transformed from γ along Ac
3 )
Pearlite (transformed from γ along Ac
1 )
Ac
3
Ac
1
Hypo- Hyper-

Recap: Time-temperature-transformation (T-T-T) Diagram
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles” by Robert E. Reed-hill
Isothermal transformation diagram
Kinetics of transformation: effect of time
Important reactions
Pearlitic
Bainitic
Martensitic
Non-equilibrium phases: martensite (ferrite
supersaturated with C ) and bainite (mixture of ferrite
and Fe
3C)
Types of bainite: Upper bainite and Lower bainite
Diffusionless transformation (M
s and M
f)
Hardenability

Recap: Continuous cooling transformation (C-C-T) Diagram
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles”
by Robert E. Reed-hill
Note the absence of bainitic region in C-C-T diagram

Recap: Effect of C on TTT/CCT diagram: Hypo- and Hypereutectoid Steels
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles” by Robert E. Reed-hill
❖Note the additional transformati0n line (marked by red
arrow) for proeutectoid ferrite above eutectoid temp.
❖In Hypo- and Hyper-eutectoid compositions, the C-curve
is shifted towards left side
❖Faster transformation to pearlite/bainite due to
heterogeneous nucleation of eutectoid ferrite or
cementite, assisted by pre-existing pro-eutectoid
ferrite or cementite, respectively

Recap: Effect of other alloying elements on TTT/CCT diagram
Material:
AISI 4340 steel (Fe-0.4C-0.4Cr-1.8Ni-0.25Mo)
Figure Source: “The Science and Engineering of Materials” by Askeland et al.
❖Shifting of pearlitic reaction towards right side
due to addition of Ni, Cr and Mo
❖No shift in bainitic reaction rate, as bainitic
transformation rate is determined by
partitioning of C atoms between ferrite and
cementite; not the other alloying elements

Effect of C content on mechanical properties
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.

Effect of C content on mechanical properties
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Note: Izod impact energy tells us about
impact toughness of materials

Effect of tempering on martensitic steels
Source: “The Science and Engineering of Materials” by Askeland et al.

Contains ≤ 0.3 wt% C
Little or no hardenability
Good weldability
Common Microstructure: pro-eutectoid ferrite and pearlite
Common Processing route: hot-rolling (or, cold drawn/rolled and annealed)
Applications:
Structural beams
Automotive panels
Pipelines
Plain Low C-steels
http://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/
https://www.theworldmaterial.com/astm -a36-steel/
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/automotive/applications
“Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.

Composition: contains 0.3-0.6 wt. % C
plain medium C-steels have low hardenability (e.g. AISI 1040/EN8 steel)
Ni, Cr, Mo added to improve hardenability (e.g. AISI 4340/EN24 Steel)
Processing route: hot-worked and/or annealed/ normalized (for C-steels) or
Quenching+tempering (for C-steels and alloy steels)
Have higher strength and toughness than low C-steels
Applications:
Railway wheels and tracks
Gears, crankshafts
Medium Carbon steels
https://practicalmaintenance.net
https://www.eatonsteel.com/1040 -hot-rolled-steel-bar.html
1040 steel 4340 steel
Lee et al. (2019), Adv.Engg Mater., 21, 1801116
Mechanical Properties
“Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.

Composition: contains 0.6-1.4 wt. % C
Good hardenability
Difficult to cold work
Poor weldability
Cr or Mo added as carbide formers in high alloy steels (e.g. D2 Steel)
Common Microstructure: pearlitic (for C-steels)
Applications: cutting and milling tools, knives, hammer, blades
High carbon steels
https://practicalmaintenance.net/wp -
content/uploads/High-carbon-AISI-1095-Steel.jpg
https://www.engineersgallery.com/high -speed-steels/

High C steels with addition of Cr or Mo carbide formers (e.g. D2 Steel (High-Cr), M1
steel (High Mo))
Precipitation of carbides (M
23C
6 type) at high T gives secondary hardening
Good hardenability
Exceptionally High strength and toughness
Common Microstructure: tempered martensite with carbides
Applications: cutting and milling tools, dies for casting and forming
Tool steels
https://www.engineersgallery.com/high -speed-steels/
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051941

In conventional structural steels, C provides primary source of strengthening
Increase in C content leads to (1) reduction in Lower ductility and impact toughness, (2) Lower weldability,
(3) Increase in ductile-brittle transition temperature
HSLA/Microalloyed steels - introduction

Subset of Low-C steel (C <0.3 wt.); Also called Microalloyed steels
small concentrations (<0.1 wt%) of other alloying elements e.g.
Mo/Ti/Nb/V/Al <0.1 wt.% (carbide forming elements)
Cu/Ni (for SS strengthening)
Stronger and tougher than low C steels
Common Microstructure: fine equiaxed ferrite + carbides/nitrides/carbonitrides + pearlite (depending upon
C %) Table 1: Composition of LC (1020) and HSLA (A656) steels in wt.%
HSLA / Micro-alloyed steels

Common Microstructure: ferritic equiaxed + with/out pearlite + with/out carbides/carbonitrides
Processing route involves hot rolling above austenitization temperature to induce (1) precipitation of
carbides/carbonitrides and (2) retard growth of dynamically recrystallized γ-grains by pinning
Primary Strengthening mechanisms:
grain refinement
precipitation strengthening
Table 1: Composition of LC (1020) and HSLA (A656)
steels in wt.%
Table 2: Comparison of Mechanical properties
“Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
HSLA / Micro-alloyed steels

Interstitial Free (IF) Steels
Steels with C, N < 30 ppm
Ti and/or Nb added to stabilize (form carbides/nitrides with) remaining
interstitial C and N atoms
Almost no C, N available as interstitials
predominantly ferritic (BCC) structure;
no pearlite
Majumdar et al., Met Trans A, 2006, 37A, 3541-53
S. Hoile (2000), Materials Science
and Technology, 16:10, 1079-1093

Interstitial Free (IF) Steels (contd.)
First commercial development in Japan during 1970s following the
introduction of vacuum degassing technology
Extremely high ductility with low strength; ideal for car body panels
produced by sheet metal forming
Also called Extra Deep Drawing Steels (EDDS)
Tensile curve does not show yield point elongation due to insufficient
interstitial atoms
Acharya et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 565, 405–413
IF
IF-HS
IF
IF-HS

Advanced High strength Steels (AHSS) for Automotive Applications
Lightweight and high strength cuts energy use & GHG; challenge: keep safety & cost.
UltraLight Steel Auto Body (ULSAB) Consortium: thirty-five steel manufacturers,
representing twenty-two countries; reduced weight by 25% using lighter and stronger
steels vs. conventional steels.
https://ahssinsights.org/
ULSAB was replaced by Future Steel Vehicle (FSV)
program aimed for battery Electric vehicles: 35–39% mass
saving;
AHSS Steels have been key to achieve energy efficiency.
Examples: Dual Phase (DP) steels , TRIP, TWIP, Complex
Phase (CP), HF (Hot formed)
2021 Global Formability Diagram comparing strength and elongation of current
and emerging steel grades.

Dual Phase (DP) Steels
Immensely popular in automotive applications
Dual phase microstructure:
Primary phase: ferrite
Secondary phase: martensite (+ bainite + retained austenite)
https://www.thyssenkrupp -steel.com/en/products/sheet-coated-products/multiphase-steel/dual-phase-steel/

Dual Phase (DP) Steels: composition and processing
Composition:
C: 0.06–0.15 wt.% (for strengthening martensite)
Mn: 1.5–3% wt.% (for stabilizing austenite)
Cr (<0.5 wt.%) and Mo (0.2-0.4 wt.%) (to improve
hardenability)
Si: 0.15 wt.% (to promote ferrite transformation)
V and Nb (for precipitation strengthening and
microstructure refinement; similar to HSLA)
General Processing Route : cold rolling → intercritical annealing (ICA) → Quenching
Tasan et al., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015. 45:391–431
ICA gives ferrite + austenite; Austenite is richer in C
Quenching results in formation of high-C hard martensite

Dual Phase (DP) Steels: mechanical properties
Lower YS (due to soft ferrite phase) and continuous yielding (due to 2-phase microstructure )
High strain hardening response rate and high UTS/YS ratio
Considerable ductility and toughness (crashworthiness)
https://ahssinsights.org/metallurgy/steel-grades/ahss/dual-phase/

Dual Phase (DP) Steels: Deformation mechanism
Strain partitioning: Ferrite deforms first, martensite resists →
strain gradients form.
Mismatch at interfaces produces geometrically necessary
dislocations (GNDs) which maintain the compatibility between
ferrite and martensite grains at their interface.
Pile-ups of the dislocations at ferrite-martensite interfaces cause
work hardening.
Progressive activation: At higher strain, martensite start to
plastically deform, adding more dislocations.
Continuous hardening: Interfaces keep generating obstacles,
delaying strain hardening saturation/necking
https://ahssinsights.org/metallurgy/steel-grades/ahss/dual-phase/