Ferrous alloys upto DP steels from NIT Rourkela.pdf
vaibhavemailone
4 views
29 slides
Sep 16, 2025
Slide 1 of 29
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
About This Presentation
NIT Rourkela 2025
4th year MM
Size: 6.58 MB
Language: en
Added: Sep 16, 2025
Slides: 29 pages
Slide Content
Subject Code: MM4161
Course Instructor: Dr.SrijanAcharya
Assistant Professor
Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering,
National Institute of Technology Rourkela
Complex Ferrous and Non-ferrous Alloys
Classification of steels
Steels
Low Alloy
Low
Carbon
Plain
carbon
High Strength Low Alloy
Medium
Carbon
High
Carbon
High Alloy
Tool steels
Stainless
steels
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering
An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Ferrous alloys : Fe-C phase diagram
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Ferrous alloys Recap : Fe-Fe3C phase diagram
Salient features:
Equillibrium diagram (thermodynamic); does not say about
kinetics (effect of time)
Effect of C on phase stability
Solubility of C in different phases
Invariant reactions
Eutectoid (γ α + Fe3C)
Eutectic (L γ + Fe3C)
Peritectic (L + δ γ)
Steel side (up to ≈ 2.11 wt.% C) and cast iron side (beyond
2.11 wt.% C )
Ac3 (γ γ + α) and Ac1 (γ α + Fe3C) lines
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles” by Robert E. Reed-hill
0.02 %
Solubility of C in α and γ: role of interstitial void size
Octahedral
FCC
BCC
Tetrahedral
Source: “Steels: Microstructure and Properties ” by Sir HKDH Bhadeshia and Sir R. HoneyKombe
Solubility of C in α and γ: role of interstitial void size
Octahedral
FCC
BCC
Tetrahedral
Source: “Steels: Microstructure and Properties ” by Sir HKDH Bhadeshia and Sir R. HoneyKombe
➢C has higher solubility in γ due to larger sizes of octahedral
interstitial sites in FCC-γ
➢In BCC, C occupies octahedral site despite it being smaller than
tetrahedral site
➢For in octahedral interstices movement of 2 nearest-neighbour
Fe atoms is required.
➢For tetrahedral interstices, 4 Fe atoms are of nearest-neighbor,
hence their displacement needs more strain energy.
Recap: The Eutectoid Reaction
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
The equilibrium phases in steels at RT
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
At Eutectoid composition i.e. 0.77 wt.% C:
Pearlite (lamellar mixture of eutectoid ferrite and cementite)
Hypo-eutectoid composition i.e. <0.77 wt.% C:
Proeutectoid ferrite (transformed from γ along Ac
3 )
Pearlite (transformed from γ along Ac
1 )
Hyper-eutectoid composition i.e. >0.77 wt.% C:
Proeutectoid cementite (transformed from γ along Ac
3 )
Pearlite (transformed from γ along Ac
1 )
Ac
3
Ac
1
Hypo- Hyper-
Recap: Time-temperature-transformation (T-T-T) Diagram
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles” by Robert E. Reed-hill
Isothermal transformation diagram
Kinetics of transformation: effect of time
Important reactions
Pearlitic
Bainitic
Martensitic
Non-equilibrium phases: martensite (ferrite
supersaturated with C ) and bainite (mixture of ferrite
and Fe
3C)
Types of bainite: Upper bainite and Lower bainite
Diffusionless transformation (M
s and M
f)
Hardenability
Recap: Continuous cooling transformation (C-C-T) Diagram
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles”
by Robert E. Reed-hill
Note the absence of bainitic region in C-C-T diagram
Recap: Effect of C on TTT/CCT diagram: Hypo- and Hypereutectoid Steels
Source: “Physical Metallurgy Principles” by Robert E. Reed-hill
❖Note the additional transformati0n line (marked by red
arrow) for proeutectoid ferrite above eutectoid temp.
❖In Hypo- and Hyper-eutectoid compositions, the C-curve
is shifted towards left side
❖Faster transformation to pearlite/bainite due to
heterogeneous nucleation of eutectoid ferrite or
cementite, assisted by pre-existing pro-eutectoid
ferrite or cementite, respectively
Recap: Effect of other alloying elements on TTT/CCT diagram
Material:
AISI 4340 steel (Fe-0.4C-0.4Cr-1.8Ni-0.25Mo)
Figure Source: “The Science and Engineering of Materials” by Askeland et al.
❖Shifting of pearlitic reaction towards right side
due to addition of Ni, Cr and Mo
❖No shift in bainitic reaction rate, as bainitic
transformation rate is determined by
partitioning of C atoms between ferrite and
cementite; not the other alloying elements
Effect of C content on mechanical properties
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Effect of C content on mechanical properties
Source: “Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Note: Izod impact energy tells us about
impact toughness of materials
Effect of tempering on martensitic steels
Source: “The Science and Engineering of Materials” by Askeland et al.
Contains ≤ 0.3 wt% C
Little or no hardenability
Good weldability
Common Microstructure: pro-eutectoid ferrite and pearlite
Common Processing route: hot-rolling (or, cold drawn/rolled and annealed)
Applications:
Structural beams
Automotive panels
Pipelines
Plain Low C-steels
http://www.phase-trans.msm.cam.ac.uk/
https://www.theworldmaterial.com/astm -a36-steel/
https://www.tatasteeleurope.com/automotive/applications
“Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Composition: contains 0.3-0.6 wt. % C
plain medium C-steels have low hardenability (e.g. AISI 1040/EN8 steel)
Ni, Cr, Mo added to improve hardenability (e.g. AISI 4340/EN24 Steel)
Processing route: hot-worked and/or annealed/ normalized (for C-steels) or
Quenching+tempering (for C-steels and alloy steels)
Have higher strength and toughness than low C-steels
Applications:
Railway wheels and tracks
Gears, crankshafts
Medium Carbon steels
https://practicalmaintenance.net
https://www.eatonsteel.com/1040 -hot-rolled-steel-bar.html
1040 steel 4340 steel
Lee et al. (2019), Adv.Engg Mater., 21, 1801116
Mechanical Properties
“Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
Composition: contains 0.6-1.4 wt. % C
Good hardenability
Difficult to cold work
Poor weldability
Cr or Mo added as carbide formers in high alloy steels (e.g. D2 Steel)
Common Microstructure: pearlitic (for C-steels)
Applications: cutting and milling tools, knives, hammer, blades
High carbon steels
https://practicalmaintenance.net/wp -
content/uploads/High-carbon-AISI-1095-Steel.jpg
https://www.engineersgallery.com/high -speed-steels/
High C steels with addition of Cr or Mo carbide formers (e.g. D2 Steel (High-Cr), M1
steel (High Mo))
Precipitation of carbides (M
23C
6 type) at high T gives secondary hardening
Good hardenability
Exceptionally High strength and toughness
Common Microstructure: tempered martensite with carbides
Applications: cutting and milling tools, dies for casting and forming
Tool steels
https://www.engineersgallery.com/high -speed-steels/
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051941
In conventional structural steels, C provides primary source of strengthening
Increase in C content leads to (1) reduction in Lower ductility and impact toughness, (2) Lower weldability,
(3) Increase in ductile-brittle transition temperature
HSLA/Microalloyed steels - introduction
Subset of Low-C steel (C <0.3 wt.); Also called Microalloyed steels
small concentrations (<0.1 wt%) of other alloying elements e.g.
Mo/Ti/Nb/V/Al <0.1 wt.% (carbide forming elements)
Cu/Ni (for SS strengthening)
Stronger and tougher than low C steels
Common Microstructure: fine equiaxed ferrite + carbides/nitrides/carbonitrides + pearlite (depending upon
C %) Table 1: Composition of LC (1020) and HSLA (A656) steels in wt.%
HSLA / Micro-alloyed steels
Common Microstructure: ferritic equiaxed + with/out pearlite + with/out carbides/carbonitrides
Processing route involves hot rolling above austenitization temperature to induce (1) precipitation of
carbides/carbonitrides and (2) retard growth of dynamically recrystallized γ-grains by pinning
Primary Strengthening mechanisms:
grain refinement
precipitation strengthening
Table 1: Composition of LC (1020) and HSLA (A656)
steels in wt.%
Table 2: Comparison of Mechanical properties
“Materials Science and Engineering An Introduction” by William D. Callister, Jr.
HSLA / Micro-alloyed steels
Interstitial Free (IF) Steels
Steels with C, N < 30 ppm
Ti and/or Nb added to stabilize (form carbides/nitrides with) remaining
interstitial C and N atoms
Almost no C, N available as interstitials
predominantly ferritic (BCC) structure;
no pearlite
Majumdar et al., Met Trans A, 2006, 37A, 3541-53
S. Hoile (2000), Materials Science
and Technology, 16:10, 1079-1093
Interstitial Free (IF) Steels (contd.)
First commercial development in Japan during 1970s following the
introduction of vacuum degassing technology
Extremely high ductility with low strength; ideal for car body panels
produced by sheet metal forming
Also called Extra Deep Drawing Steels (EDDS)
Tensile curve does not show yield point elongation due to insufficient
interstitial atoms
Acharya et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, 565, 405–413
IF
IF-HS
IF
IF-HS
Advanced High strength Steels (AHSS) for Automotive Applications
Lightweight and high strength cuts energy use & GHG; challenge: keep safety & cost.
UltraLight Steel Auto Body (ULSAB) Consortium: thirty-five steel manufacturers,
representing twenty-two countries; reduced weight by 25% using lighter and stronger
steels vs. conventional steels.
https://ahssinsights.org/
ULSAB was replaced by Future Steel Vehicle (FSV)
program aimed for battery Electric vehicles: 35–39% mass
saving;
AHSS Steels have been key to achieve energy efficiency.
Examples: Dual Phase (DP) steels , TRIP, TWIP, Complex
Phase (CP), HF (Hot formed)
2021 Global Formability Diagram comparing strength and elongation of current
and emerging steel grades.
Dual Phase (DP) Steels: composition and processing
Composition:
C: 0.06–0.15 wt.% (for strengthening martensite)
Mn: 1.5–3% wt.% (for stabilizing austenite)
Cr (<0.5 wt.%) and Mo (0.2-0.4 wt.%) (to improve
hardenability)
Si: 0.15 wt.% (to promote ferrite transformation)
V and Nb (for precipitation strengthening and
microstructure refinement; similar to HSLA)
General Processing Route : cold rolling → intercritical annealing (ICA) → Quenching
Tasan et al., Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2015. 45:391–431
ICA gives ferrite + austenite; Austenite is richer in C
Quenching results in formation of high-C hard martensite
Dual Phase (DP) Steels: mechanical properties
Lower YS (due to soft ferrite phase) and continuous yielding (due to 2-phase microstructure )
High strain hardening response rate and high UTS/YS ratio
Considerable ductility and toughness (crashworthiness)
https://ahssinsights.org/metallurgy/steel-grades/ahss/dual-phase/
Dual Phase (DP) Steels: Deformation mechanism
Strain partitioning: Ferrite deforms first, martensite resists →
strain gradients form.
Mismatch at interfaces produces geometrically necessary
dislocations (GNDs) which maintain the compatibility between
ferrite and martensite grains at their interface.
Pile-ups of the dislocations at ferrite-martensite interfaces cause
work hardening.
Progressive activation: At higher strain, martensite start to
plastically deform, adding more dislocations.
Continuous hardening: Interfaces keep generating obstacles,
delaying strain hardening saturation/necking
https://ahssinsights.org/metallurgy/steel-grades/ahss/dual-phase/