He_Jiankui_Affair_2022_Presentation.pptx

fijime1555 0 views 20 slides Sep 27, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 20
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20

About This Presentation

He_Jiankui_Affair


Slide Content

The He Jiankui Affair: A CRISPR Ethics Case Study Exploring the Scientific, Ethical, and Legal Fallout of Human Germline Editing Presenter: $$ Your Name $$ Affiliation: IISER Berhampur Date: $$ Insert Date $$

Executive Summary (The Core Issue) A Deliberate Violation: Redrawing the Line - The He Jiankui case was a deliberate violation of global scientific and ethical consensus on human germline editing. - This case is a critical inflection point, forcing global bodies, scientists, and the public to define explicit red lines and establish concrete regulatory frameworks.

Introduction: What is Germline Editing? - CRISPR-Cas9: A precise tool to target and edit DNA. - Somatic: Non-heritable edits (e.g., curing cancer). - Germline: Heritable edits passed to future generations.

Background: Who is He Jiankui? - Associate Professor at SUSTech (Shenzhen, China). - Ph.D. (Rice University), Post-doc (Stanford University). - Educated, ambitious, with strong Western ties.

Genesis of the Experiment - Recruited HIV-discordant couples (Father HIV+, Mother HIV-). - Goal: Edit CCR5 gene to confer resistance to HIV. - Preventative and heritable.

CRISPR Methodology Used - Target: CCR5 (HIV entry receptor). - Steps: IVF → CRISPR injection → Screening → Implantation. - Desired variant: Δ32 mutation.

The Claimed Outcome - November 2018: Announcement at Hong Kong Summit. - Lulu and Nana (2018), Amy (2019). - Claimed 'HIV resistance'.

Scientific Flaws in the Experiment - Mosaicism: Incomplete edits. - Novel mutations: Uncharacterized, harmful variants. - No medical need: HIV prevention already possible.

Major Ethical & Research Violations - Forged ethics approval. - Misleading informed consent. - Exploitation of vulnerable couples. - Violated global moratorium.

International and Scientific Community Reaction - Immediate condemnation by WHO, NASEM, and others. - Strong response from Chinese authorities.

Legal Consequences for He and Collaborators - Fired by SUSTech, suspended research. - Dec 2019: Convicted of illegal medical practice. - Sentences: He (3 yrs, 3M yuan fine), others fined/imprisoned. - Released April 2022.

Fate of the Children - Lulu, Nana, Amy under medical supervision. - Unknowns: mosaicism, long-term health, psychological impact. - Ethical obligation: lifelong follow-up care.

Regulatory & Policy Response - China: Rapid legal reforms, stricter penalties. - Global: WHO guidelines, calls for international moratorium.

Impact on Science and Public Trust - Chilling effect: slowed legitimate research. - Positive: stronger IRBs, public engagement. - Trust damaged; transparency emphasized.

Lessons Learned - Safety and necessity first. - Broad public and international consensus required. - Science must prioritize ethics over ambition.

Ongoing Legacy: Where is He Jiankui Now? - Released April 2022, started new lab in Beijing. - Focus on affordable rare-disease gene therapies. - Facing global skepticism.

Broader Ethical Questions - Should germline editing ever be allowed? - Who decides: scientists, governments, or citizens? - How to prevent ethical dumping globally?

Discussion Questions - Could He's experiment be justified if flawless? - Who should regulate: governments or scientists? - Role of emerging nations in global dialogue?

References - NASEM Reports - WHO Guidelines - Court report summaries - Key news coverage

Thank You / Q&A Thank you! Questions? Contact: $$ Your Email / LinkedIn / Research Group $$
Tags