Immunogenicity requirements of peptides require

deepubpharm96 173 views 19 slides May 29, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 19
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19

About This Presentation

Immunogenicity requirements


Slide Content

Assessing Immunogenicity Risk of Peptides: the
Synthetic Peptide Guidance and PSGs
Eric Pang
Senior Chemist, Office of Research and Standards (ORS),
Office of Generic Drugs (OGD)
CDER | U.S. FDA
September 20, 2020
SBIA 2022: Advancing Generic Drug Development:
Translating Science to Approval
Day (1), Session 1A: (Peptide Immunogenicity Risk and Impurity Assessment Considerations)

www.fda.gov 2
Learning Objectives
•Describe Guidance for ANDAs for Certain Highly
Purified Synthetic Peptide Drug Products That Refer
to Listed Drugs of rDNA Origin
•Summarize immunogenicity and non-clinical assays
•Discuss product-specific guidances(PSGs) for
peptide products
•Evaluate immunogenicity risk assessment for
peptides

www.fda.gov 3
Manufacturing and Impurities of Peptide
Drugs
Manufacturing pathways
oChemical synthesis -made by chemical synthesis (e.g., step-by-step amino acid synthesis addition)
oRecombinant DNA (rDNA origin) -recombinantly expressed peptide extracted from cells (e.g., yeast
or bacteria)
oExtraction from natural sources
Different manufacturing process can result in different impurities, which may give rise to different
safety concerns
•Process related (host cell proteins, leachable extractables, microbial contaminant, etc.)
•Peptide related (impurities related to the API peptide, such as deletion, duplication, etc.)
Hence, generics should demonstrate differences in impurities would not increase a product’s risk

www.fda.gov 4
Guidance: ANDAs for Certain Highly Purified Synthetic Peptide
Drug Products That Refer to Listed Drugs of rDNA Origin
FDA outlined current thinking to address potential immunogenicity risk for synthetic
Glucagon, Liraglutide, Nesiritide, Teriparatide, and Teduglutide referencing
recombinant RLDs
•For specified impurities commonto proposed generic and
reference listed drug (RLD)
▪Level in proposed generic ≤RLD
•For any newimpurities in the proposed generic
▪> 0.5% is not acceptable
▪Impurities at 0.10%-0.5%identified, characterized and
justified for not affecting the safety and efficacy,
including comparative immunogenicity risk tests

www.fda.gov 5
Clarifications to the Synthetic ANDA
Peptide Guidance
•Like PSG, the synthetic ANDA peptide guidance contains
recommendations.
•Applicable for the five peptide products, however, the
scientific principles and recommendations of the guidance
may apply to other peptides depending on risk.
•Impurities greater than the RLD and new impurities greater
than 0.5% maynot be able to rely on non-clinical risk
assessment. Reach out to us for these situations through
controlled correspondence
1
or Pre-ANDA meeting
2
processes.
1.Guidance for Industry: Controlled Correspondence Related to Generic Drug Development. www.fda.gov/media/109232/download
2.Guidance for Industry: Formal Meetings Between FDA and ANDA Applicants of Complex Products Under GDUFA.
www.fda.gov/media/107626/download

www.fda.gov 6
Impurity-Related Immunogenicity Risk:
Innate and Adaptive Immunities
Innate immunity
Adaptive immunity
All process-related
impurities
(contaminants, leachables)
Testing on whole product
(independent of presence
of new impurities)
Innate immune response modulating impurities (IIRMI) assays
Detect innate immunogenic potential of low levels of process
and product-related impurities
Peptide-related impurities
(e.g., deletions, insertions…)
Testing on each isolated impurity:
•T-cell epitope in peptide-
related impurities
•New impurities in proposed
generic (0.10%-0.5%)
In silico assays
In vitro cell-based assays to assess MHC (Major
Histocompatibility Complex) binding and/or
identify responsive T cells
Dranoff, G., Nature Rev. Cancer, 2004

w 7
Ex -Clinic
Assess
In s
•A quick
e
•Ho
In
•HLA
•Cel-based
In
•T

w 8
In Vitr
Mod
Cell Origin Commer
A
PBMC/whole Pr
Cy
Human
m
Y
RA-BL NFk Mouse Y
Ma -l-
MonoMac6
Cy Human Y
THP-1 NFk orCy. Human Y
HEK -R NFk Human e y
Dendrit
act
Acti
mark
Fr Y

w 9
Common Challeng -Vitr
•Suf
•Suf
me
•Suf
t

w 10
Pr -Specific Guidances(PSGs)
•FD
in
appr e.s
equiv
•P
PSGs
r
•PSG
c
demo

w 11
R
P
R
A I
p
A
I
I
I
HO
ol
Bi
a
Sem SubQ-
Solut
209637 X X X X X X
V 204485 X X X
Sec
Human
021256 X X X X
Br SubQ-
Solut
210557 X X
Octr SubQ-
Solut
213224 X X
•N

w 12
Initial
P
•P
–P
homo -lif
•In
–Ind
•Clini
–An-drug
adv

w 13
Summar
•PSG r
think
pep
–The
wher
–PSG
•Nonclinic
assess
•Ther
s

w 14
GDUF
•IAA-224-19-3008SE
Imp
–Ho Molec 2021
•75F40120C00157Imm
In
•H In-sil -vit
Dr
Pl
https:// -dr -dru-r -collabora -
op

w 15
Acknow
•R
•Lei Zh
•Mar
•Dar
•Y
•Dey
OBP
•St
•Daniela
OLD
•Bing
•P
•Came
D

w 16
Challeng
Which not
c
Hig
tha
A.Ne
B.T
C.Gluc
D.Secr

w 17
Challeng
Which NO true?
A.PSGs
sa
B.Imm
r
C.Adap
r
c
D.P
s
guidanc

Ques
Eric
Sen
Of
C
Eri
Tags