Index numbers(unweighted index number)(simple aggregative method by fixed base)
1,196 views
8 slides
Dec 05, 2020
Slide 1 of 8
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
About This Presentation
Index numbers(unweighted index number)(simple aggregative method by fixed base)
Size: 125.35 KB
Language: en
Added: Dec 05, 2020
Slides: 8 pages
Slide Content
INDEX NUMBERS Unweighted index number Simple Aggregative Method by Fixed Base: NADEEM UDDIN ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR OF STATISTICS https://www.slideshare.net/NadeemUddin17 https://nadeemstats.wordpress.com/listofbooks/
Unweighted index number Simple Aggregative Method by Fixed Base: It is obtained by dividing the sum of the prices of current year by the sum of the prices of base year and expressed as percentage i.e.
Commodities Price (2010) Price (2011) A 50 65 B 75 77 C 98 102 D 100 120 E 150 167 Example – 1: Calculate the price index number for the year 2011 by using simple aggregative method.
Commodities P o P n A 50 65 B 75 77 C 98 102 D 100 120 E 150 167 Solution:
Commodities Prices 2005 2006 2007 2008 Sugar 15 16.5 17 18 Wheat 25.4 21.4 25.5 30.4 Rice 15.5 16.2 19 19.5 Gram 13.5 14.3 13.7 14.0 Example – 2 : Calculate index number for the following data. Taking 2005 as base year by using simple aggregative method.
Solution: Commodities Sugar 15 16.5 17 18 Wheat 25.4 21.4 25.5 30.4 Rice 15.5 16.2 19 19.5 Gram 13.5 14.3 13.7 14.0 For 2006: For 2007: For 2008:
Commodities Price 2000 Price 2002 Wheat 25.4 30.2 Rice 18.9 19.3 Barley 16.3 18.5 Jawar 11.5 13.6 Grams 13.6 13.9 1-Compute the index number using simple aggregative method with base 2000. Commodities Price 2000 Price 2001 Price 2002 A 81 82 85 B 90 93 95 C 20 22 23 D 15 20 25 E 50 53 56 F 77 78 80 2-Compute the index numbers using simple aggregative method with base 2000. DO YOURSELF
Commodities Price 2002 Price 2003 Price 2004 Price 2005 Price 2006 A 75 52 94 83 50 B 62 44 77 65 48 C 100 118 101 144 155 D 200 203 195 210 215 3-Compute the index numbers using simple aggregative method with base 2002. Answers (1).111.44% (2).104.50% ,109.31% (3).95.42% ,106.86% ,114.87% ,107.09%