Innovative Approaches to Manage Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Charting New Courses of Care
PeerView
18 views
57 slides
Mar 11, 2025
Slide 1 of 57
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
About This Presentation
Chair, David Bernstein, MD, MACG, FAASLD, AGAF, FACP, discusses primary biliary cholangitis in this CME/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE activity titled “Innovative Approaches to Manage Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Charting New Courses of Care.” For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, and complete ...
Chair, David Bernstein, MD, MACG, FAASLD, AGAF, FACP, discusses primary biliary cholangitis in this CME/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE activity titled “Innovative Approaches to Manage Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Charting New Courses of Care.” For the full presentation, downloadable Practice Aids, and complete CME/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, and to apply for credit, please visit us at https://bit.ly/4ivyUgS. CME/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE credit will be available until March 9, 2026.
Size: 5.57 MB
Language: en
Added: Mar 11, 2025
Slides: 57 pages
Slide Content
Innovative Approaches to Manage
Primary Biliary Cholangitis
Charting New Courses of Care
David Bernstein, MD, MACG, FAASLD, AGAF, FACP
Professor of Medicine
NYU Grossman School of Medicine
Director
Gastroenterology and Hepatology Ambulatory Network-Long Island
NYU-Langone Health
Bethpage, New York
Go online to access full CME/NCPD/AAPA/IPCE information, including faculty disclosures.
+ Slow, progressive, autoimmune injury of the bile ducts leading to cirrhosis and liver failure
Clinical burden
+ Fatigue, pruritus, jaundice, cirrhosis
+ Long-term medical care, including monitoring for liver failure and transplantation
+ Significant economic costs related to hospitalizations, medications, ongoing care
+ Reduced physical, emotional, and social well-being
+ Mental health burden: increased risk of depression and anxiety due to chronic symptoms.
+ Chronic fatigue, itching, and disability impact work, relationships, and personal activities
cer Vi
Mets OF el al Hepetoogy. 2013:58273-83. 2. Gungabissoon U et al BH) Open Gestoentera 2022, 2000857. PeerView
+ Exposure to environmental mimic of modified E2 subunit
of the mitochondrial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex
(PDC-E2) triggers an immune response against biliary
epithelial cells (BECs)
immune system by presenting autoantigens on major
histocompatibility complex (MHC) II, leading to production
of disease-specific antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs)
+ AMAS target immunodominant PDC-E2 epitopes in the
inner mitochondrial membrane, contributing to BEC
damage and apoptosis
+ Dysfunctional anion exchanger 2 (AE2) sensitizes BECS
to apoptosis, exposing PDC-E2 in apoptotic blebs, forming
antigen-antibody complexes that lead to cellular injury
+ An imbalance between proinflammatory effector T cells
and regulatory T cells dysregulates the immune response,
sustaining biliary damage
+ Inadequate immune suppression leads to progressive
inflammation, cholestasis, biliary fibrosis, and cirrhosis
acteristic Typical of a Patient With PBC
Age >45 years
Sex Woman > man (9:1)
Symptoms Fatigue, pruritus, sicca, abdominal pain, arthralgias
en AMA positive in -95%; disease-specific ANA positive
in -30%-50° ¡SMA may be present
Immunoglobulin IgM typically elevated
Serum liver tests ALP elevated
Imaging Normal bile ducts
Liver histology Lymphocytic infiltrate, inflammatory duct lesion, granuloma possible
inde KO et Hepat, 2188639649. 2, Undo KO eta Hope. 202270121013 PeerView
Improve through elastography
symptoms ‘consider add-on
and liver ‘combination therapies
biochemistry targets not reached
mr
Stratify disease risk,
start UDCA treatment
and set goals
‘Consider 2L therapies.
{or patients with
Incomplete response
to UDCA.
Reassess patient bloodwork and Reduce fibrosis, increase
quality of life. Consider early 21. transplant free survival and
‘therapy for at high-risk patients. normalize quality of life
1. Cangado OGL et al Lancet Gast Hep. 2025 [Epub ahead of pint) PeerView
Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA): First-Line Treatment for PBC*
+ First-line therapy for improving biochemical indices and delaying disease progression
Effective in 50% to 60% of patients | or normalize ALP
| or normalize ALT
40% will not achieve
an adequate
biochemical response
Gl side effects ee, {
(eg, diarrhea, nausea,
UDCA treats PBC but
does not alleviate associated
symptoms, such as |
abdominal pain) fatigue or pruritus
1 Undo Ko et Heat. 201829394418. 2, Born Let a J Manag Care Spe Porm. 20162. PeerVi
3. tips /Aiverfoundation orglver-diseases/autoimmune-lver-diseases/primary-biliary-cholangits-pbe. FeerView
AASLD Guidance Statements on First-Line Treatment!
+ UDCA dosed at 13-15 mg/kg/day is recommended for patients with PBC who have abnormal
liver enzyme values
+ Biochemical response to UDCA (eg, ALP, ALT levels) should be evaluated 12 months after
treatment initiation to determine whether second-line therapy is indicated
This guidance was developed before the accelerated FDA
approval of PPAR agonists seladelpar and elafibranor,
which are second-line treatments
Most clinicians assess response at 6 months
+. Lindo KD et a. Hepatology. 2019.90:294418. 2, Lindo KO ela Hopooy.2021:76:1012:019. PeerView
Response and [+] Other PBC
Tolerability we Symptoms.
+ Up to 40% of patients will not achieve
ie complete ech aca (spores + From AASLD: “UDCA therapy does not
+ 5% to 10% of patients are unable to improve fatigue, pruritus, associated
tolerate UDCA bone disease, or autoimmune features
found in association with PBC.”
— Major adverse effects are
Gl-related (eg, diarrhea,
nausea, abdominal pain)
| + Biochemical response to UDCA (eg, ALP, ALT levels) should be evaluated 12 months
after treatment initiation to determine whether second-line therapy is indicated
- Patients who do not satisfactorily respond to UDCA should be considered for
treatment with obeticholic acid (OCA), starting at 5 mg/day
— Fibrates can be considered as off-label alternatives for patients with PBC and
inadequate response to UDCA
This guidance was developed before the accelerated FDA
approval of PPAR agonists seladelpar and elafibranor,
which are second-line treatments
Most clinicians assess response after 6 months
|. Lindor KD et a. Hepatology. 2019.20:294418. 2, Lindo KO ell Hepetology. 2021:76:1012:019. PeerView
PPAR isoforms modulate different biological processes, including:
Energy utilization
Cholestasis Lipids eral Inflammation Fibrosis
PPARa — Ss ——
<= +--+
4, Haczaye Feta Hapatol Commun. 2017:1:663-674. 2. Jones D et al Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017:2:716:720. 3. valzako K e al Proc Mat Acad Sci USA.
ONE MOB 1908.2137.4.Durmaky AUX Bowls CL. Gattoertera Hepat (NM 20 ESTOS de Gava NV etal rd Mo! Sc 202122008 PeerVi
6. Choi YJ et al. Atherosclerosis. 2012;220:470-476. eerview
ELATIVE trial was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and
safety of elafibranor 80 mg once daily in patients with PBC with an inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA
Primary Endpoint
Elafibranor 80 mg +
161 Patients With PBC UDCA Biochemical response at week 52:
08) + ALP <1.67 x ULN
Select inclusion criteria: + ALP decrease 215% from baseline
+ 212 months of treatment + Total bilirubin < ULN
with UDCA
Select Secondary Endpoints
+ Aged 18-75 years
+ ALP 21.67 x ULN ALP normalization
Reduction in WI-NRS
+ Total bilirubin <2 x ULN en en
q > == 5-D itch scale
Change in ALP
+ Elafibranor was studied in combination with UDCA: 95% (153/161) of patients were receiving concurrent UDCA
+ ULN for ALP was defined as 104 units/L for women and 129 units/L for men
PeerView
1. Kowdley KV et al. N Eng! J Med. 2024.300.795-805,
100
20 MM Elafibranor (n = 108) P=.002
Biochemical Response* * MM Placebo (n= 53) 15
100 MElafibranor (n = 108) z
Im Placebo (n = 53) =
90 a
*
E Time, wk
5
3 Change in Score on WI-NRS
5 10
4
¿a
E
E
Time, wk 2 Elafibranor
E DE mm TE TO es we 82
ALP <1 67x ULN with a decrease of 215% and total bibi normalization rom week 4 to week 52. mee PeerView
1 Kowalay KV et al. N Engl Y Mod. 2024 300 705-805.
Adverse Drug-Drug
Events Interactions
+ No significant adverse events + Reduces exposure of progestin
when compared with placebo except and ethinyl estradiol which can
lead to contraceptive failure and/or
— 6% fracture rate in elafibranor arm breakthrough bleeding
compared with 0% in placebo arm
+ Coadministration of HMG-CoA
reductase ors (statins)
can increase risk of myopathy
— Periodic monitoring of CPK with
HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor use
+ Coadministration of rifampin may
reduce systemic exposure to elafibranor
4. Kowdley etal. N Engl J Med, 2024;380:785-805, PeerView
2 Igivo [ealibranor)Prescribing Information. hips Jwrwwaccessdala da govidrugsafda. doeslabel2024/218260s0000 pal.
RESPONSE trial was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety
of seladelpar 10 mg once daily in patients with PBC with an inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA
Month 0 6 EOS 12
Key Inclusion Criteria \
N=193 Open-label
: long-term study*
PBC and inadequate response or SE CO
intolerance to UDCA
or
ALP 21.67x ULN
ALT and AST <3x ULN 2-week safety
Total bilirubin <2x ULN follow-up visit
[+ Can have compensated cirrhosis
Secondary endpoints:
+ ALP normalization at month 12
+ Changes in pruritus NRS at month 6 in patients with
moderate to severe pruritus (NRS 24) at baseline
Primary endpoints:
+ Composite biochemical response at month 12
- ALP <1.67 x ULN
— ALP decrease 215%
— Total bilirubin $1.0 x ULN
‘Misha ota o PeerView
+ OAT3 inhibitors such as probenecid,
rifampin, cabotegravir
+ No significant adverse events
when compared with placebo except
+ Strong CYP2C9 inhibitors such as
fluoxetine and amiodarone (avoid
taking together)
— 4% fracture rate in seladelpar arm
compared with 0% in placebo arm
+ BCRP inhibitors such as rosuvastatin,
glyburide, nitrofurantoin, chlorothiazide,
sulfasalazine
— Monitor closely for adverse effects
+ Mestad Qu ot a. ng J Mad, 2024200783796 i
2. Livdelzi (seladelpar) Prescribing Information. https //www accessdata fda govidrugsatida_docs/label'2024/2178993000Ib1 pdf. PeerV lew
= Approved in patients with PBC with incomplete
response to or intolerant of UDCA
+ Pruritus: numerically reduced itch in phase 3 trial
but was not statistically significant
+ Common AEs: headache, diarrhea, abdominal
pain, nausea; possible elevations in liver enzymes,
particularly in patients with pre-existing liver
disease; fracture
+ Common DDIs: hormonal contraceptives, statins,
rifampin, bile acid sequestrants
— Approved in patients with PBC with incomplete
response to or intolerant of UDCA.
Pruritus: met secondary endpoint in phase 3 trial
that itch was statistically significantly reduced
Common AEs: headache, diarrhea, nausea;
potential elevations in liver enzymes (though
typically reversible); pruritus (itching) may worsen
initially, but this is often transient; fracture
Common DDIs: probenecid, rifampin, bile acid
sequestrants
Medi Dosage Considerations
+ Approved for pruritus in ALGS and PFIC
Odevixibat 40-120 mcg/kg/day
Abdominal pain, diarrhea
+ Approved for pruritus in ALGS and PFIC
Maralixibat 190-380 mcg/kg/day
Abdominal pain, diarrhea
+ Have shown efficacy in treating cholestatic pruritus in pediatric diseases like ALGS and PFIC
+» Set the stage for further investigation into IBAT inhibitors for treating PBC-related pruritus
GLIMMER: Phase 2b Trial of Linerixibat!? VANTAGE: Phase 2b Study of Volixibat?
In GLIMMER, linerixibat ameliorated itch compared with placebo following
12 weeks’ treatment; lower doses were better tolerated. + N= 30 patients with PBC randomized 1:1:1
3 Mean Worst Daily Itch Score to volixibat 20 mg twice daily, volixibat 80
É (Patients with moderate to severe pruritus’) mg twice daily, or placebo twice daily
2 pce me 90mg 180 mg 40 mg 90 mg + ItchRO score (0-10) used to assess pruritus
5 TS ance daly once daly once daly toe daly dee day
i, n=19) 5) n= 16) mi) (n= 19) + Combined volixibat groups achieved a
Ea statistically significant reduction from
Ea baseline in pruritus vs placebo (-3.82 points
4 3 vs -1.50 points; P < .0001) at the 16-week
E 2 interim analysis
EL” 0374 - Placebo-adjusted difference:
2 -2.32 points (P = .0026)
+ 24-week data from GLISTEN (phase 3 trial) demonstrate the
primary endpoint was met
- Significant reduction in pruritus vs placebo
4. Levy Cet a. Cin Gastroentorot Hepatol. 2023:21:1802-1912 PeerView