Page 4 of 7
4
taken, raw materials in use therein or the intermediate or finished products, bye-products,
wastes or effluents thereof would –
I. Cause material impairment to the health of the persons engaged in or connected
with the process operation;
II. Result in pollution of general environment
“Health is defined as an adjustment of the individual to his physical, mental, and social
environment rather than absence of disease.”
One of the major factors that affect men at work is the presence of various chemical
substances in the working environment. The Factories Act, 1948 (as amended in 1987)
brings out a list of 430 hazardous chemicals, which are either toxic or flammable or
explosive. The Factories Act (as amended) suggests that one must refer to „Material
Safety Data Sheet (M S D S)‟ of chemicals before its use, handling and/or transportation.
MSDS gives information about the physical, chemical, and toxicological character of the
chemicals, possible effects of the chemicals on health of workers on exposure, limit of
their threshold value (TLV) as identified by AGIH and suggests the methods of
safeguarding.
Obstacles in implementing Safety: There are a number of factors that add difficulty to
solve the safety problems, the most troublesome of them is the universal failure to see
that the hazard control in industries is a complex problem. It is viewed as a simple matter
of applying a few specific routines like wearing helmet, shoes, and fastening a safety belt.
In most cases routines are repeated regularly despite obvious signs that they are
inadequate and/or ineffective and are not job specific. It is greatly needed that the
organization understand the sources of harm, and control them at their basic origins in
spite of the fact that their consequences differ in character and severity. This
understanding gives us a realization that
Hazards are not the simple agents, and they should be closely identified with
injuries.
Mere regulating them is not the sure way of limiting their effect.
It is, in fact, necessary to employ the means that can control the causes responsible for the
presence of injurious agents. Control requires action, but the steps planned for applying
corrective actions must be acceptable to management. They are to meet the safety
objectives without interfering significantly with other aims of management (i.e.
production, productivity, cost, quality etc.), which might get hindered. It is often seen that
safety‟s requirements conflict with financial restraints, convenience, or other factors.
When other priorities must be considered great enough, control actions for safety should
never be optimized. In recent years the growing demand for safety is being viewed ahead
of the priority for production and productivity for the company to stand firm in business
competition. Some management even worked out the „cost-benefit analyses‟ in
application of legal, engineering, administrative controls to solve safety related problems
and have benefited.
Knowledge & information is key in safety: The implementation of safety depends on
information and judgment. Decisions are made in accordance with „what is known‟ about