Introduction to Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

4,248 views 69 slides Apr 01, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 69
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69

About This Presentation

a brief introduction to systematic review & meta-analysis


Slide Content

Assoc. Prof. Dr.
HasanainFaisalGhazi
•MBChB (University of Baghdad)
Master & PhD (UKM, Malaysia)
•Publication:
89 Full papers (56 in SCOPUS)
H Index = 11
•Published Systematic Review & Meta
Analysis (7)
•Editor in Chief, Global Journal of Public
Health Medicine.
@AP_Dr_Hasanain_Faisal_Ghazi 2

INTRODUCTION
Why We Do Sys. Rev. ??????
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Evidence-based medicine
•Istheprocessofsystematicallyreviewing,appraising,andusing
clinicalresearchfindingstoaidthedeliveryofoptimumclinicalcare
topatients.
Clinical
Judgment
Relevant
scientific
evidences
Patient values
& preferences
EBM

Definition
•Asystematicreviewsummarisestheresultsofavailablecarefully
designedhealthcarestudies(controlledtrials)andprovidesahigh
levelofevidenceontheeffectivenessofhealthcare
interventions.Judgmentsmaybemadeabouttheevidenceandinform
recommendationsforhealthcare.
Reference:https://consumers.cochrane.org/what-systematic-review
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

SR & MA
•Asystematicreviewanswersadefinedresearchquestionby
collectingandsummarisingallempiricalevidencethatfitspre-
specifiedeligibilitycriteria.
•Ameta-analysisistheuseofstatisticalmethodstosummarisethe
resultsofthesestudies.
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

WHATISSYSTEMATICREVIEW
•Focus on specific question
•use explicit , pre-planned scientific methods to:
1.Identify
2.Select
3.Appraise
4.Summarize similar but separate studies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Must Have
•clearlystatedobjectiveswithpre-definedeligibilitycriteriaforstudies
•explicit,reproduciblemethodology
•asystematicsearchthatattemptstoidentifyallstudies
•assessmentofthevalidityofthefindingsoftheincludedstudies(e.g.
riskofbias)
•systematicpresentation,andsynthesis,ofthecharacteristicsand
findingsoftheincludedstudies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

SYSTEMATIC
REVIEW META ANALYSIS
TRADITIONAL
NARRATIVE
REVIEW
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

TRADITIONALNARRATIVEREVIEW
•No standard format
•No specific methods for selecting and appraising
•Quantitively synthesis rarely used to integrate information from
multiple studies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

SRSteps
1.Gather your team
2.Develop protocol
3. Data collection, locate and screen
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

4. abstract data , appraise risk of Bias
5. synthesis findings and interpret
6. report writing
7. update
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

METAANALYSIS
•Is an OPTIONALcomponent of systematic review.
•Astatisticalanalysiswhichcombinestheresultsofseveral
independentstudiesconsideredbytheanalysttobecombinable
(Huque,1988).
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

What meta analysis can help
•Assess strength of evidence
To determine whether an effect exists in a particular direction
•Combine results quantitively
To obtain a single summary result
•Investigate heterogeneity
To examine reasons for different results among studies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Addressing same question?
•What is the effect of interferon therapy in hepatitis C?
•Size of effect might be higher when participants are older, more
educated or healthier than others
•Different forms of interferon
•Different interferon doses
•Different viral subtypes of hepatitis C
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

WHEN TO DO MA??
•Whenmorethan1studyhasestimatedatreatmenteffector
association.
•Whenthedifferenceinstudycharacteristicsareunlikelytoeffect
treatmenteffect.
•Whenthetreatmenteffecthavebeenmeasuredandreportedinsimilar
ways(orwhendataavailable).
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

WHO IS DOING SYS. REV.
•Independent authors
•Cochrane collaboration
•Group interested in policy
•Business
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Who is using Sys Rev
•Individual doctors and researchers
•Patient and consumers
•Guidelines producers
•Policy makers
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

IOM standers for systematic reviews
•Initiating a systematic review
•Establish a review team
•Manage bias and conflict of interest of the review team
•Ensure stakeholder input
•Manage bias and conflict of interest of those providing input
•Formulate the topic
•Develop the protocol
•Submit the protocol for peer review
•Make protocol publicly available
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Formulate the Topic
•Confirm the need for a new review
•Develop an analytic framework
•Use a standard format to articulate each question of interest For
example, PICO(TS)
•State a rationale for each question
•Refine each question
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Formulating the Question in a Systematic
Review
•“The most important maxim for data analysis to heed, and one which
many statisticians have shunned is this: ‘far better an approximate
answer to the right question, which is often vague, than an exact
answer to the wrong question, which can always be made precise.’”
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Ways Similar Studies May Differ
•Patient population
•Inclusion and exclusion criteria
•Exposure definition/intervention composition, dose, timing
•Comparison group/controls
•Management protocol(co interventions) for trials
•Outcome definition(follow-up time, cause-specific mortality)
•Quality of design and execution
•Analysis
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Components of well-structured question
•P patients or population
•I intervention/ exposure
•C comparison groups (s)
•O outcome
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Type of people
•Define condition or disease, including explicit diagnostic criteria
•Population and setting of interest (age, race, sex, community, hospital,
outpatient)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Type of risk factors
•Timing of exposure
•Route of administration
•Dose of intensity
•Duration of exposure or therapy
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Type of comparison group
•For trials :
•Placebo
•Standard therapy
•No treatment
•For epidemiological STUDIES
•No exposure
•Non-cases (hospital, neighborhood, etc)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Types of outcome
•Criteria of defining
•Important to consumers, providers
•Unpublished data
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Well constructed and answerable clinical
question
•Forpreschoolchildrenwithmildtomoderatevisualacuity
impairment,areglassesandpatchingeffectiveinimprovingvisual
acuity,comparedwithglassesaloneornotreatment?
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Some groups add TS to PICO
•T= TIMING (Duration of minimum of follow up)
•S= sitting (primary care, specialty, inpatients )
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

•EffectivenessbestansweredwithRCT
•HarmbestansweredwithRCTbutusuallymorepracticaltouse
observationaldata(rareevents,occurringafterfollow-upcompletein
anRCT)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

EXAMPLES
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

RESEARCH QUESTION
IS Drug therapy associated with long term morbidity and mortality in older
persons with moderate hypertension?
•P = older persons with moderate hypertension
•I= drug therapy
•C= not stated ( presumably any intervention other than named drug therapy
•O= long term morbidity and mortality
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Finding the evidence
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Major databases
•Major bibliographic databases for RCT
•Medline/Pubmed
•EMBASE
•Cochrane central register for controlled trials
•National and regional databases
•Subject specific datbases
•CINAHL
•PsychINFO
•OTSeeker
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Citation databases
•Web of science
•SCOPUS
•Dissertation (ProQuest)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Register of ongoing trials
•www.clinicaltrials.gov
•www.centerwatch.com
•www.controlles-trials.com
•WHO Portal
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Break into concepts
•P POPULATION
•I INTERVENTION
•C COMPARISON
•O OUTCOME
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Patients with choroidal neovascularization associated with age related macular degeneration, do
intravitreal injections of Lucentis , when compared with Avastin , prevent vision loss?
Individuals with choroidal neovascularization associated with
age related macular degeneration
Lucentis (Ranibizumab)
Avastin
Changeinvisualacuity or visual field
P
I
C
O

•START WITH GENERAL FORMAT:
•(Population OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•(Intervention OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•(Comparison OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•(Outcome OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•Add study type filters
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Documenting the search
•Bibliographic software management
•Endnote
•Mendely
•QUOSA
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

•WHEN DID THE SEARCH
•Month/year
•Where you searched
•Electronic databases
•Hand searches
•Trial registers
•Internet
•bibliographies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

•How you searched
•Strategies
•What you found
•PRISMA flow diagram
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

PRISMA
http://www.prisma-statement.org/
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Assessing the risk of BIAS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

ELEMENTS OF STUDY QUALITY THAT CAN
BE ASSESSED BY READING STUDY REPORT
•INTERNAL VALIDITY
•EXTERNAL VALIDITY
•RELEVANCE, ORIGINALITY
•ETHICS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

BIAS
•SELECTION BIAS
•INFORMATION BIAS
•ANALYSIS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

META ANALYSIS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

•A meta-analysis is a survey in which the results of the studies included
in the review are statistically similar and are combined and analysed as
if they were one study.
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

PLANNING THE ANALYSIS
•Results of meta analysis can be very misleading if suitable attention
has not been given to:
•Formulate the review question
•Specify eligibility criteria
•Identify, select and critically appraise studies
•Collect appropriate data
•Decide what would be meaningful to analyze
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

•Systematic review contain analysis of the primary studies
•Qualitative: structured summary, description , and discussion of the
studies characteristics that may affect the cumulative evidence
•Quantitative: involves statistical analysis( meta-analysis)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

A general framework for synthesis
•What is the direction of effect (association )
•What is the size of effect?
•Is the effect consistent across studies ?
•What is the strength of evidence for the effect ?
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

What is meta analysis
•Anoptionalcomponentofsystematicreview
•Definition:
•Thestatisticalanalysisofalargecollectionofanalysisresultsfrom
individualstudiesforthepurposeofintegratingthefindings(Glass1976)
•Thestatisticalanalysiswhichcombinestheresultsofseveralindependent
studiesconsideredbytheanalysttobecombinable(Huque,1988)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Data presentation
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
•FOREST GRAPHS
•FUNNEL PLOTS
•RADIAL PLOTS

Reference : Hoffman, J. I. E. (2015).Meta-analysis. Biostatistics for Medical and Biomedical
Practitioners, 645–653.doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802387-7.00036-

•Typicalfigureofresponsetosomenewtreatment.Thedotsarethe
meanlogoddsratio,andthehorizontallinesindicate95%confidence
limits.Figuresintheright-handcolumnaretheweightsassignedto
eachstudy;thestudiesareoftenarrangedindescendingweights.The
solidverticallineat0indicatesnodifferencebetweenthegroups,and
thedashedverticallineindicatesthepooledaverage.Somefigures
includethenumbersofsubjectsineachgroup.
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Note on interpretation
•Theresultsofmeta-analysis(estimateandconfidenceinterval)asany
otherstudymustbeinterpretedinthecontextofaclinicallyimportant
effectsize
•Statisticallysignificantresultmaynotbeclinicallyimportant
•Resultsthatisnotstatisticallysignificantmaystillbecompatiblewith
aclinicallyimportanteffect
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

Why we do meta analysis
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
1.Increase power and precision (detect effect as statistically significant)
2. Quantify effect sizes and their uncertainty
Reduce problems of interpretation due to sampling variation
3. Assess homogeneity / heterogenicity of results
4. Answer questions not posed by individual studies

CONCLUSION
•Systematic review is essential for healthcare
•Meta analysis is an optional thing in SR
•SR should be done in team
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

•CochraneisaBritish
internationalcharitable
organisationformedto
organisemedicalresearch
findingstofacilitate
evidence-basedchoices
abouthealthinterventions
involvinghealth
professionals,patientsand
policymakers.Itincludes
53reviewgroupsthatare
basedatresearch
institutionsworldwide
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

FURTHER READINGS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

https://www.nap.edu/
catalog/13059/finding
-what-works-in-health-
care-standards-for-
systematic-reviews
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi

THANK YOU
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi