Introduction to Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis
4,248 views
69 slides
Apr 01, 2020
Slide 1 of 69
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
About This Presentation
a brief introduction to systematic review & meta-analysis
Size: 5.33 MB
Language: en
Added: Apr 01, 2020
Slides: 69 pages
Slide Content
Assoc. Prof. Dr.
HasanainFaisalGhazi
•MBChB (University of Baghdad)
Master & PhD (UKM, Malaysia)
•Publication:
89 Full papers (56 in SCOPUS)
H Index = 11
•Published Systematic Review & Meta
Analysis (7)
•Editor in Chief, Global Journal of Public
Health Medicine.
@AP_Dr_Hasanain_Faisal_Ghazi 2
INTRODUCTION
Why We Do Sys. Rev. ??????
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
SR & MA
•Asystematicreviewanswersadefinedresearchquestionby
collectingandsummarisingallempiricalevidencethatfitspre-
specifiedeligibilitycriteria.
•Ameta-analysisistheuseofstatisticalmethodstosummarisethe
resultsofthesestudies.
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
WHATISSYSTEMATICREVIEW
•Focus on specific question
•use explicit , pre-planned scientific methods to:
1.Identify
2.Select
3.Appraise
4.Summarize similar but separate studies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Must Have
•clearlystatedobjectiveswithpre-definedeligibilitycriteriaforstudies
•explicit,reproduciblemethodology
•asystematicsearchthatattemptstoidentifyallstudies
•assessmentofthevalidityofthefindingsoftheincludedstudies(e.g.
riskofbias)
•systematicpresentation,andsynthesis,ofthecharacteristicsand
findingsoftheincludedstudies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
SYSTEMATIC
REVIEW META ANALYSIS
TRADITIONAL
NARRATIVE
REVIEW
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
TRADITIONALNARRATIVEREVIEW
•No standard format
•No specific methods for selecting and appraising
•Quantitively synthesis rarely used to integrate information from
multiple studies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
SRSteps
1.Gather your team
2.Develop protocol
3. Data collection, locate and screen
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
4. abstract data , appraise risk of Bias
5. synthesis findings and interpret
6. report writing
7. update
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
METAANALYSIS
•Is an OPTIONALcomponent of systematic review.
•Astatisticalanalysiswhichcombinestheresultsofseveral
independentstudiesconsideredbytheanalysttobecombinable
(Huque,1988).
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
What meta analysis can help
•Assess strength of evidence
To determine whether an effect exists in a particular direction
•Combine results quantitively
To obtain a single summary result
•Investigate heterogeneity
To examine reasons for different results among studies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Addressing same question?
•What is the effect of interferon therapy in hepatitis C?
•Size of effect might be higher when participants are older, more
educated or healthier than others
•Different forms of interferon
•Different interferon doses
•Different viral subtypes of hepatitis C
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
WHEN TO DO MA??
•Whenmorethan1studyhasestimatedatreatmenteffector
association.
•Whenthedifferenceinstudycharacteristicsareunlikelytoeffect
treatmenteffect.
•Whenthetreatmenteffecthavebeenmeasuredandreportedinsimilar
ways(orwhendataavailable).
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
WHO IS DOING SYS. REV.
•Independent authors
•Cochrane collaboration
•Group interested in policy
•Business
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Who is using Sys Rev
•Individual doctors and researchers
•Patient and consumers
•Guidelines producers
•Policy makers
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
IOM standers for systematic reviews
•Initiating a systematic review
•Establish a review team
•Manage bias and conflict of interest of the review team
•Ensure stakeholder input
•Manage bias and conflict of interest of those providing input
•Formulate the topic
•Develop the protocol
•Submit the protocol for peer review
•Make protocol publicly available
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Formulate the Topic
•Confirm the need for a new review
•Develop an analytic framework
•Use a standard format to articulate each question of interest For
example, PICO(TS)
•State a rationale for each question
•Refine each question
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Formulating the Question in a Systematic
Review
•“The most important maxim for data analysis to heed, and one which
many statisticians have shunned is this: ‘far better an approximate
answer to the right question, which is often vague, than an exact
answer to the wrong question, which can always be made precise.’”
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Ways Similar Studies May Differ
•Patient population
•Inclusion and exclusion criteria
•Exposure definition/intervention composition, dose, timing
•Comparison group/controls
•Management protocol(co interventions) for trials
•Outcome definition(follow-up time, cause-specific mortality)
•Quality of design and execution
•Analysis
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Components of well-structured question
•P patients or population
•I intervention/ exposure
•C comparison groups (s)
•O outcome
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Type of people
•Define condition or disease, including explicit diagnostic criteria
•Population and setting of interest (age, race, sex, community, hospital,
outpatient)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Type of risk factors
•Timing of exposure
•Route of administration
•Dose of intensity
•Duration of exposure or therapy
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Type of comparison group
•For trials :
•Placebo
•Standard therapy
•No treatment
•For epidemiological STUDIES
•No exposure
•Non-cases (hospital, neighborhood, etc)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Types of outcome
•Criteria of defining
•Important to consumers, providers
•Unpublished data
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Well constructed and answerable clinical
question
•Forpreschoolchildrenwithmildtomoderatevisualacuity
impairment,areglassesandpatchingeffectiveinimprovingvisual
acuity,comparedwithglassesaloneornotreatment?
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Some groups add TS to PICO
•T= TIMING (Duration of minimum of follow up)
•S= sitting (primary care, specialty, inpatients )
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
RESEARCH QUESTION
IS Drug therapy associated with long term morbidity and mortality in older
persons with moderate hypertension?
•P = older persons with moderate hypertension
•I= drug therapy
•C= not stated ( presumably any intervention other than named drug therapy
•O= long term morbidity and mortality
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Finding the evidence
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Major databases
•Major bibliographic databases for RCT
•Medline/Pubmed
•EMBASE
•Cochrane central register for controlled trials
•National and regional databases
•Subject specific datbases
•CINAHL
•PsychINFO
•OTSeeker
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Citation databases
•Web of science
•SCOPUS
•Dissertation (ProQuest)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Register of ongoing trials
•www.clinicaltrials.gov
•www.centerwatch.com
•www.controlles-trials.com
•WHO Portal
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Break into concepts
•P POPULATION
•I INTERVENTION
•C COMPARISON
•O OUTCOME
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Patients with choroidal neovascularization associated with age related macular degeneration, do
intravitreal injections of Lucentis , when compared with Avastin , prevent vision loss?
Individuals with choroidal neovascularization associated with
age related macular degeneration
Lucentis (Ranibizumab)
Avastin
Changeinvisualacuity or visual field
P
I
C
O
•START WITH GENERAL FORMAT:
•(Population OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•(Intervention OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•(Comparison OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•(Outcome OR synonym #1 OR synonym #2) AND
•Add study type filters
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Documenting the search
•Bibliographic software management
•Endnote
•Mendely
•QUOSA
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
•WHEN DID THE SEARCH
•Month/year
•Where you searched
•Electronic databases
•Hand searches
•Trial registers
•Internet
•bibliographies
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
•How you searched
•Strategies
•What you found
•PRISMA flow diagram
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
PRISMA
http://www.prisma-statement.org/
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Assessing the risk of BIAS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
ELEMENTS OF STUDY QUALITY THAT CAN
BE ASSESSED BY READING STUDY REPORT
•INTERNAL VALIDITY
•EXTERNAL VALIDITY
•RELEVANCE, ORIGINALITY
•ETHICS
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
•A meta-analysis is a survey in which the results of the studies included
in the review are statistically similar and are combined and analysed as
if they were one study.
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
PLANNING THE ANALYSIS
•Results of meta analysis can be very misleading if suitable attention
has not been given to:
•Formulate the review question
•Specify eligibility criteria
•Identify, select and critically appraise studies
•Collect appropriate data
•Decide what would be meaningful to analyze
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
•Systematic review contain analysis of the primary studies
•Qualitative: structured summary, description , and discussion of the
studies characteristics that may affect the cumulative evidence
•Quantitative: involves statistical analysis( meta-analysis)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
A general framework for synthesis
•What is the direction of effect (association )
•What is the size of effect?
•Is the effect consistent across studies ?
•What is the strength of evidence for the effect ?
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
What is meta analysis
•Anoptionalcomponentofsystematicreview
•Definition:
•Thestatisticalanalysisofalargecollectionofanalysisresultsfrom
individualstudiesforthepurposeofintegratingthefindings(Glass1976)
•Thestatisticalanalysiswhichcombinestheresultsofseveralindependent
studiesconsideredbytheanalysttobecombinable(Huque,1988)
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Data presentation
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
•FOREST GRAPHS
•FUNNEL PLOTS
•RADIAL PLOTS
Reference : Hoffman, J. I. E. (2015).Meta-analysis. Biostatistics for Medical and Biomedical
Practitioners, 645–653.doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802387-7.00036-
Note on interpretation
•Theresultsofmeta-analysis(estimateandconfidenceinterval)asany
otherstudymustbeinterpretedinthecontextofaclinicallyimportant
effectsize
•Statisticallysignificantresultmaynotbeclinicallyimportant
•Resultsthatisnotstatisticallysignificantmaystillbecompatiblewith
aclinicallyimportanteffect
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
Why we do meta analysis
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi
1.Increase power and precision (detect effect as statistically significant)
2. Quantify effect sizes and their uncertainty
Reduce problems of interpretation due to sampling variation
3. Assess homogeneity / heterogenicity of results
4. Answer questions not posed by individual studies
CONCLUSION
•Systematic review is essential for healthcare
•Meta analysis is an optional thing in SR
•SR should be done in team
@AP_Dr.Hasanain_Ghazi