IPP-ITS-Lecture-07-15102025-115240am.pptx

noorulhudaaltaf19 6 views 12 slides Oct 17, 2025
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 12
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12

About This Presentation

group system in a society


Slide Content

Lecture: 07 Groups and organization Edited By: Baqir Ali

Groups and Organizations Social life is structured by the groups and organizations we belong to. Sociologists study these entities because they profoundly influence individual behavior, shape social structure, and are central to how society functions, particularly in modern, complex settings.

1. The Sociological Importance of Groups A social group is defined as two or more people who identify with and interact with one another. They provide the context for socialization, identity formation, and the realization of both personal and collective goals. Social Identity: Groups are fundamental to the social construction of self. We define ourselves, in part, by the groups we belong to. Social Control: Groups establish and enforce norms (rules) through pressure and sanctions, ensuring conformity. Mediators: Groups mediate between the individual and the large-scale social structure, translating broad societal expectations into manageable daily interactions.

2. Types of Groups and Identity Sociologists classify groups based on their structure, size, and function: Group Type Characteristic Contextual Example Sociological Insight Primary Group Small, personal, and enduring. Members share intimate, face-to-face relationships. (Cooley) Family, close friends, childhood neighborhood group. Source of deep emotional support, socialization, and the formation of a child's fundamental values. Secondary Group Large, impersonal, and goal-oriented. Relationships are typically temporary and based on a specific activity or interest. Colleagues in a large corporation, members of a political party, a university class. Provides necessary function (e.g., income, education) but lacks emotional depth. Gesellschaft ties.

Reference Group A social group that serves as a point of reference in making evaluations and decisions. Individuals may or may not belong to it. Professional athletes, a particular social class, or the "cool kids" in high school. Shapes anticipatory socialization and personal aspirations, influencing what we value and strive for. In-Group A social group toward which a member feels respect and loyalty ("we"). One's nationality, race, or sports team. Fosters a strong sense of cohesion and pride. Out-Group A social group toward which a member feels competition or opposition ("they"). A rival company, another political faction, or a foreign nation. The existence of an out-group strengthens in-group solidarity (functionalist view). This distinction is a source of ethnocentrism and conflict.

3. Understanding Formal Organizations and Bureaucracy A Formal Organization is a large, secondary group that is rationally designed to achieve its objectives efficiently. These organizations dominate modern life, structuring everything from government to commerce. Origin of Bureaucracy (Max Weber) Sociologist Max Weber (1864–1920) was the foundational figure in the study of formal organizations. He argued that the rise of the bureaucracy was an inevitable consequence of the shift from traditional society to modern, rational-legal society. Weber saw bureaucracy as the purest expression of rationality—a way of organizing human activity to achieve goals most efficiently. He was both fascinated and deeply troubled by bureaucracy, fearing it would create an "iron cage" of rules and procedures that stifled human freedom and creativity.

É mile Durkheim and Bureaucracy (An Indirect Link) While Weber focused on rationality, É mile Durkheim (1858–1917) focused on solidarity. Durkheim viewed the shift to modern society (from Gemeinschaft to Gesellschaft) as moving from Mechanical Solidarity (based on similarity) to Organic Solidarity (based on interdependence). Bureaucracies, with their specialized roles and intricate divisions of labor, are the structures that enforce and rely on this Organic Solidarity. The efficient coordination within a bureaucracy allows modern society to function through mutual dependence.

Characteristics of Bureaucracy (Weber's Ideal Type) Weber identified six key characteristics of the ideal type of bureaucracy (a theoretical model, not necessarily a description of reality): Hierarchy of Authority: Clear chain of command, with officials supervising those below them. Clear Division of Labor: Specialized tasks assigned to different positions. Explicit Rules and Regulations: Operation is governed by formalized, written rules. Impersonality: Rules apply to everyone regardless of personal ties; emotions are excluded. Technical Competence: Hiring and promotion are based on documented skills and formal qualifications. Official Records: Extensive use of written files and documentation.

4. Principles of Interaction in Groups (Theories of Exchange) Social interaction within groups, particularly secondary groups, can often be explained by underlying rational principles related to costs and rewards. These principles often draw from Social Exchange Theory (a micro-level perspective). Principle Description Contextual Example (East/West) Sociological Theory Link Pleasure Principle Individuals are driven to seek gratification and avoid pain or punishment in their interactions. (Freud's Id is a related concept). A teenager chooses to spend time with friends who validate them (pleasure) rather than with family who critique them (pain/punishment). Symbolic Interactionism: Our actions are driven by the search for positive self-definition in the eyes of others.

Rationality Principle Individuals calculate the costs and benefits of social action and choose the option that maximizes benefit (utility) while minimizing cost. Western/Present Context: A person chooses a professional career path (high effort/cost) because the social status and high salary (high benefit) outweigh the investment. Conflict Theory: The powerful use their rationality to structure organizations to maximize their benefits (profit/control) at the expense of others.

Reciprocity Principle The expectation that a favor or benefit granted will be returned in kind, maintaining social equilibrium. Eastern/Past Context (Guanxi): Business or political favors are exchanged to build long-term, mutually beneficial relationships essential for success. Functionalism: Reciprocity is a key mechanism for maintaining social cohesion and trust, preventing social relationships from dissolving into pure self-interest.

Fairness Principle The expectation that rewards and costs will be distributed equitably according to effort or contribution (distributive justice). Present Context: Workplace conflicts often arise when employees feel their efforts (cost) are not proportional to their pay or recognition (reward) compared to colleagues. Social Exchange Theory: Violation of this principle leads to tension and breakdown of the social relationship or group, initiating conflict.
Tags