Isaiah 40 commentary

glenndpease 625 views 190 slides Feb 25, 2015
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 273
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134
Slide 135
135
Slide 136
136
Slide 137
137
Slide 138
138
Slide 139
139
Slide 140
140
Slide 141
141
Slide 142
142
Slide 143
143
Slide 144
144
Slide 145
145
Slide 146
146
Slide 147
147
Slide 148
148
Slide 149
149
Slide 150
150
Slide 151
151
Slide 152
152
Slide 153
153
Slide 154
154
Slide 155
155
Slide 156
156
Slide 157
157
Slide 158
158
Slide 159
159
Slide 160
160
Slide 161
161
Slide 162
162
Slide 163
163
Slide 164
164
Slide 165
165
Slide 166
166
Slide 167
167
Slide 168
168
Slide 169
169
Slide 170
170
Slide 171
171
Slide 172
172
Slide 173
173
Slide 174
174
Slide 175
175
Slide 176
176
Slide 177
177
Slide 178
178
Slide 179
179
Slide 180
180
Slide 181
181
Slide 182
182
Slide 183
183
Slide 184
184
Slide 185
185
Slide 186
186
Slide 187
187
Slide 188
188
Slide 189
189
Slide 190
190
Slide 191
191
Slide 192
192
Slide 193
193
Slide 194
194
Slide 195
195
Slide 196
196
Slide 197
197
Slide 198
198
Slide 199
199
Slide 200
200
Slide 201
201
Slide 202
202
Slide 203
203
Slide 204
204
Slide 205
205
Slide 206
206
Slide 207
207
Slide 208
208
Slide 209
209
Slide 210
210
Slide 211
211
Slide 212
212
Slide 213
213
Slide 214
214
Slide 215
215
Slide 216
216
Slide 217
217
Slide 218
218
Slide 219
219
Slide 220
220
Slide 221
221
Slide 222
222
Slide 223
223
Slide 224
224
Slide 225
225
Slide 226
226
Slide 227
227
Slide 228
228
Slide 229
229
Slide 230
230
Slide 231
231
Slide 232
232
Slide 233
233
Slide 234
234
Slide 235
235
Slide 236
236
Slide 237
237
Slide 238
238
Slide 239
239
Slide 240
240
Slide 241
241
Slide 242
242
Slide 243
243
Slide 244
244
Slide 245
245
Slide 246
246
Slide 247
247
Slide 248
248
Slide 249
249
Slide 250
250
Slide 251
251
Slide 252
252
Slide 253
253
Slide 254
254
Slide 255
255
Slide 256
256
Slide 257
257
Slide 258
258
Slide 259
259
Slide 260
260
Slide 261
261
Slide 262
262
Slide 263
263
Slide 264
264
Slide 265
265
Slide 266
266
Slide 267
267
Slide 268
268
Slide 269
269
Slide 270
270
Slide 271
271
Slide 272
272
Slide 273
273

About This Presentation

A verse by verse commentary on Isaiah chapter 40.


Slide Content

ISAIAH 40 COMMENTARY 
EDITED BY GLENN PEASE 
 
INITIATION INTO ISAIAH  
by  
J. Vernon McGee, Th.D., LL.D.  
Copyright @ 1960  
THIRD DIVISION  
SALVATION (Poetry) Chapters 40-66  
This is the third and last major division of the prophecy of Isaiah. It is in contrast to the 
first major section. There we had judgment and the righteous government of God. In this 
section we have the grace of God, the suffering and glory to follow, here all is grace and 
glory. The opening statement “comfort ye” sets the mood and tempo for this section.  
It is this section that has caused the liberal critics to postulate the Deutero-Isaiah 
hypothesis. A change of subject matter does not necessitate a change of authorship. It is 
interesting that for 1900 years there was not a word about a second Isaiah. John refers to 
this section as authored by Isaiah. He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, 
Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias (John 1:23).  
Our Lord likewise referred to this section as written by Isaiah (Luke 4:7-21). There are 
numerous other references which confirm the authorship of Isaiah. Philip used it to win an 
Ethiopian to Christ. The beauty and wonder of this section will come before us as we 
proceed in a detailed chapter discussion.  
 
 
Comfort for God’s People 
1 Comfort, comfort my people, 
    says your God. 

 
1.BARNES, “Comfort ye, comfort ye my people - This is the exordium, or the general 
subject of this and the following chapters. The commencement is abrupt, as often happens in 
Isaiah and the other prophets. The scene where this vision is laid is in Babylon; the time near 
the close of the captivity. The topic, or main subject of the consolation, is stated in the following 
verse - that that captivity was about to end, and that brighter and happier days were to succeed 
their calamities and their exile. The exhortation to ‘comfort’ the people is to be understood as a 
command of God to those in Babylon whose office or duty it would be to address them - that is, 
to the ministers of religion, or to the prophets. The Targum of Jonathan thus renders it: ‘Ye 
prophets, prophesy consolations concerning my people.’ The Septuagint renders it, ‘Comfort ye, 
comfort ye my people, saith God. O priests, speak to the heart of Jerusalem; comfort her.’ The 
design of Isaiah is doubtless to furnish that which should be to them a source of consolation 
when amidst the deep distress of their long captivity; to furnish an assurance that the captivity 
was about to end, and that brighter and happier times were to ensue. 
The exhortation or command is repeated, to give intensity or emphasis to it, in the usual 
manner in Hebrew, where emphasis is denoted by the repetition of a word. The word rendered 
‘comfort’ (from םחנ  s tex o) means properly to draw the breath forcibly, to sigh, pant, groan; 
then to lament, or grieve Psa_90:13; Jer_15:6; then to comfort or console one’s-self Gen_38:12. 
then to take vengeance (compare the note at Isa_1:24). All the forms of the word, and all the 
significations, indicate deep emotion, and the obtaining of relief either by repenting, or by 
taking vengeance, or by administering the proper topics of consolation. Here the topic of 
consolation is, that their calamities were about to come to an end, in accordance with the 
unchanging promises of a faithful God Isa_40:8, and is thus in accordance with what is said in 
Heb_6:17-18. 
My people - The people of God. He regarded those in Babylon as his people; and he designed 
also to adduce such topics of consolation as would be adapted to comfort all his people in all 
ages. 
Saith your God - The God of those whom he addressed - the God of the prophets or 
ministers of religion whose office was to comfort the people. We may remark here, that it is an 
important part of the ministerial office to administer consolation to the people of God in 
affiction; to exhibit to them his promises; to urge the topics of religion which are adapted to 
sustain them; and especially to uphold and cheer them with the assurance that their trials will 
soon come to an end, and will all terminate in complete deliverance from sorrow and calamity in 
heaven. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
Comfort ye, comfort ye - “The whole of this prophecy,” says Kimchi, 
“belongs to the days of the Messiah.” 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. The Babylonish captivity 
being predicted in the preceding chapter, for the comfort of God's people a deliverance is 
promised, expressed in such terms, as in the clearest and strongest manner to set forth the 
redemption and salvation by Jesus Christ, of which it was typical. Here begins the more 
evangelical and spiritual part of this prophecy, which reaches to and includes the whole Gospel 

dispensation, from the coming of John the Baptist to the second coming of Christ. It begins with 
comforts, and holds on and ends with them; which consolations, Kimchi observes, are what 
should be in the times of the Messiah; and the word "comfort" is repeated, he says, to confirm 
the thing. It is God that here speaks, who is the God of all comfort; the persons whom he would 
have comforted are his "people", whom he has chosen, with whom be has made a covenant in 
Christ, whom he has given to him, and he has redeemed by his blood, and whom he effectually 
calls by his grace; these are sometimes disconsolate, by reason of the corruptions of their nature, 
the temptations of Satan, the hidings of God's face, and the various afflictions they meet with; 
and it is the will of God they should be comforted, as appears by sending his Son to be the 
comforter of them, by giving his Spirit as another comforter, by appointing ordinances as 
breasts of consolation to them, by the promises he has made to them, and the confirmation of 
them by an oath, for their strong consolation; and particularly by the word of the Gospel, and 
the ministers of it, who are Barnabases, sons of consolation, who are sent with a comfortable 
message, and are encouraged in their work from the consideration of God being their God, who 
will be with them, assist them, and make their ministrations successful; and to these are these 
words addressed; which are repeated, not to suggest any backwardness in Gospel ministers, who 
are ready to go on such an errand, however reluctant they may be to carry bad tidings; but 
rather to signify the people's refusal to be comforted, and therefore must be spoken to again and 
again; and also to show the vehement and hearty desire of the Lord to have them comforted. The 
Targum is,  
 
"O ye prophets, prophesy comforts concerning my people.''  
 
And the Septuagint and Arabic versions insert, "O ye priests", as if the words were directed to 
them. The preachers of the Gospel are meant, and are called unto; what the Lord would have 
said for the comfort of his people by them is expressed in the following verse. 
 
4. HENRY, “
We have here the commission and instructions given, not to this prophet only, 
but, with him, to all the Lord's prophets, nay, and to all Christ's ministers, to proclaim comfort 
to God's people. 1. This did not only warrant, but enjoin, this prophet himself to encourage the 
good people who lived in his own time, who could not but have very melancholy apprehensions 
of things when they saw Judah and Jerusalem by their daring impieties ripening apace for ruin, 
and God in his providence hastening ruin upon them. Let them be sure that, notwithstanding all 
this, God had mercy in store for them. 2. It was especially a direction to the prophets that should 
live in the time of captivity, when Jerusalem was in ruins; they must encourage the captives to 
hope for enlargement in due time. 3. Gospel ministers, being employed by the blessed Spirit as 
comforters, and as helpers of the joy of Christians, are here put in mind of their business. Here 
we have, 
I. Comfortable words directed to God's people in general, 
Isa_40:1. The prophets have 
instructions from their God (for he is the Lord God of the holy prophets, Rev_22:6) to comfort 
the people of God; and the charge is doubled, Comfort you, comfort you - not because the 
prophets are unwilling to do it (no, it is the most pleasant part of their work), but because 
sometimes the souls of God's people refuse to be comforted, and their comforters must repeat 
things again and again, ere they can fasten any thing upon them. Observe here, 1. There are a 
people in the world that are God's people. 2. It is the will of God that his people should be a 
comforted people, even in the worst of times. 3. It is the work and business of ministers to do 
what they can for the comfort of God's people. 4. Words of conviction, such as we had in the 
former part of this book, must be followed with words of comfort, such as we have here; for he 
that has torn will heal us. 
 

 
5. JAMISON, “Isa_40:1-31. Second part of the prophecies of Isaiah. 
The former were local and temporary in their reference. These belong to the distant future, 
and are world-wide in their interest; the deliverance from Babylon under Cyrus, which he here 
foretells by prophetic suggestion, carries him on to the greater deliverance under Messiah, the 
Savior of Jews and Gentiles in the present eclectic Church, and the restorer of Israel and Head of 
the world-wide kingdom, literal and spiritual, ultimately. As Assyria was the hostile world power 
in the former part, which refers to Isaiah’s own time, so Babylon is so in the latter part, which 
refers to a period long subsequent. The connecting link, however, is furnished (Isa_39:6) at the 
close of the former part. The latter part was written in the old age of Isaiah, as appears from the 
greater mellowness of style and tone which pervades it; it is less fiery and more tender and 
gentle than the former part. 
Comfort ye, comfort ye — twice repeated to give double assurance. Having announced the 
coming captivity of the Jews in Babylon, God now desires His servants, the prophets (Isa_52:7), 
to comfort them. The scene is laid in Babylon; the time, near the close of the captivity; the 
ground of comfort is the speedy ending of the captivity, the Lord Himself being their leader. 
my people ... your God — correlatives (Jer_31:33; Hos_1:9, Hos_1:10). It is God’s 
covenant relation with His people, and His “word” of promise (Isa_40:8) to their forefathers, 
which is the ground of His interposition in their behalf, after having for a time chastised them 
(Isa_54:8). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
In this first address the prophet vindicates his call to be the preacher of the comfort 
of the approaching deliverance, and explains this comfort on the ground that Jehovah, who 
called him to this comforting proclamation, was the incomparably exalted Creator and Ruler of 
the world. The first part of this address (
Isa_40:1-11) may be regarded as the prologue to the 
whole twenty-seven. The theme of the prophetic promise, and the irresistible certainty of its 
fulfilment, are here declared. Turning of the people of the captivity, whom Jehovah has neither 
forgotten nor rejected, the prophet commences thus in Isa_40:1 : “Comfort ye, comfort ye may
people, saith your God.” This is the divine command to the prophets.  Nachamu (piel, literally, to 
cause to breathe again) is repeated, because of its urgency (anadiplosis, as in Isa_41:27; 
Isa_43:11, Isa_43:25, etc.). The word ר ַמאּי, which does not mean “will say” here (Hofmann, 
Stier), but “saith” (lxx, Jerome) - as, for example, in 1Sa_24:14 - affirms that the command is a 
continuous one. The expression “saith your God” is peculiar to Isaiah, and common to both 
parts of the collection (Isa_1:11, Isa_1:18; Isa_33:10; Isa_40:1, Isa_40:25; Isa_41:21; Isa_66:9). 
The future in all these passages is expressive of that which is taking place or still continuing. And 
it is the same here. The divine command has not been issued once only, or merely to one 
prophet, but is being continually addressed to many prophets. “Comfort ye, comfort ye my 
people,” is the continual charge of the God of the exiles. who has not ceased to be their God even 
in the midst of wrath, to His messengers and heralds the prophets. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “1.Comfort ye. The Prophet introduces a new subject; for, leaving the people on whom no
favorable impression was made either by threatenings or by admonitions, on account of their desperate
wickedness, he turns to posterity, in order to declare that the people who shall be humbled under the

cross will experience no want of consolation even amidst the severest distresses. And it is probable that
he wrote this prophecy when the time of the captivity was at hand, that he might not at his departure from
life leave the Church of God overwhehned by very grievous calamities, without the hope of restoration.
Though he formerly mingled his predictions with threatenings and terrors for this purpose, yet he appears
to have contemplated chiefly the benefit of those who lived at that time. What will afterwards follow will
relate to the future Church, the revival of which was effected long after his death; for he will next lay down
a perpetual doctrine, which must not be limited to a single period, and especially when he treats of the
commencement and progress of the reign of Christ. And this prophecy must be of so much the greater
importance to us, because it addresses us in direct terms; for, although it may be a spiritual application of
what goes before, so as to be doctrine that is common both to the Jews and to us, yet, as he leaves the
Jews of that age, and addresses posterity down to the end of the world, it appears to belong more
especially to us.

By this exhortation, therefore, the Lord intended to stir up the hearts of the godly, that they might not faint,
amidst heavy calamities. First, he addresses the Jews, who were soon after to be carried into that hard
captivity in which they should have neither sacrifices nor prophets, and would have been destitute of all
consolation, had not the Lord relieved their miseries by these predictions. Next, he addresses all the
godly that should live afterwards, or that shall yet live, to encourage their heart, even when they shall
appear to be reduced very low and to be utterly ruined.

That this discourse might have greater weight, and might mere powerfully affect their minds, he
represents God as raising up new prophets, whom he enjoins to soothe the sorrows of the people by
friendly consolation. The general meaning is, that, when he shall have appeared to have forsaken for a
time the wretched captives, the testimony of his grace will again burst forth from the darkness, and that,
when gladdening prophecies shall have ceased, their proper time will come round. In order to exhibit
more strongly the ground of joy, he makes use of the plural number, Comfort ye; by which he intimates
that he will send not one or another, but a vast multitude of prophets; and this he actually accomplished,
by which we see more clearly his infinite goodness and mercy.

Will say. First, it ought to be observed that the verb is in the future tense; and those commentators who
render it in the present or past tense both change the words and spoil the meaning. Indircetly he points
out an intermediate period, during which the people would be heavily afflicted, as if God had been
silent. (104) Though even at that time God did not cease to hold out the hope of salvation by some
prophets, yet, having for a long period cast them off, when they were wretchedly distressed and almost
ruined, the consolation was less abundant, till it was pointed out, as it were with the finger, that they were
at liberty to return. On this account the word comfort must be viewed as relating to a present favor; and
the repetition of the word not only confirms the certainty of the prediction, but applauds its power and
success, as if he had said, that in this message there will be abundant, full, and unceasing cause of joy.

Above all, we must hold by the future tense of this verb, because there is an implied contrast between
that melancholy silence of which I have spoken, and the doctrine of consolation which afterwards
followed. And with this prediction agrees the complaint of the Church,

“ do not see our signs; there is no longer among us a prophet or any one that knows how long.”
(Psa_74:9.)

We see how she laments that she has been deprived of the best kind of comfort, because no promise is
brought forward for soothing her distresses. It is as if the Prophet bad said, “ Lord will not suffer you to be
deprived of prophets, to comfort you amidst your severest distresses. At that time he will raise up men by

whom he will send to you the message that had been long desired, and at that time also he will show that
he takes care of you.”

I consider the future tense, will say, as relating not only to the captivity in Babylon, but to the whole period
of deliverance, which includes the reign of Christ. (105) To the verb will say, we must supply “ the
prophets,” whom he will appoint for that purpose; for in vain would they have spoken, if the Lord had not
told them, and even put into their mouth what they should make known to others. Thus there is a mutual
relation between God and the prophets,” whom he will appoint for that purpose; for in vain would they
have spoken, if the Lord had not told them and even put into their mouth what they should make known to
others. Thus there is a mutual relation between God and the prophets. In a word, the Lord promises that
the hope of salvation will be left, although the ingratitude of men deserves that this voice shall be
perpetually silenced and altogether extinguished.

These words, I have said, ought not to be limited to the captivity in Babylon; for they have a very
extensive meaning, and include the doctrine of the gospel, in which chiefly lies the power of “” To the
gospel it belongs to comfort those who are distressed and cast down, to quicken those who are slain and
actually dead, to cheer the mourners, and, in short, to bring all joy and gladness; and this is also the
reason why it is called “ Gospel,” that is, good news, (106) Nor did it begin at the time when Christ
appeared in the world, but long before, since the time when God’ favor was clearly revealed, and Daniel
might be said to have first raised his banner, that believers might hold themselves in readiness for
returning. (Dan_9:2.) Afterwards, Haggai, Zechariah, Malachi, Nehemiah, Ezra, and others, down to the
coming of Christ, exhorted believers to cherish better and better hopes. Malachi, the last of them that
wrote, knowing that there would be few prophets, sends the people to the law of Moses, to learn from it
the will of God and its threatenings and promises. (Mal_4:4.)

Your God. From this passage we learn what we ought chiefly to seek in the prophets, namely, to
encourage the hopes of godly persons by exhibiting the sweetness of divine grace, that they may not faint
under the weight of afflictions, but may boldly persevere in calling on God. But since it was difficult to be
believed, he reminds them of the covenant; as if he had said that it was impossible for God ever to forget
what he formerly promised to Abraham. (Gen_17:7.) Although, therefore, the Jews by their sins had fallen
from grace, yet he affirms that he is their God, and that they are his peculiar people, both of which
depended on election; but, as even in that nation there were many reprobates, the statement implies that
to believers only is this discourse strictly directed; because he silently permits unbelievers, through
constant languishment, to be utterly wasted and destroyed. But to believers there is held out an
invaluable comfort, that, although for a time they are oppressed by grief and mourning, yet because they
hope in God, who is the Father of consolation, they shall know by experience that the promises of grace,
like a hidden treasure, are laid up for them, to cheer their hearts at the proper time. This is also a very
high commendation of the prophetic office, that it supports believers in adversity, that they may not faint
or be discouraged; and, on the other hand, this passage shews that it is a very terrible display of God’
vengeance when there are no faithful teachers, from whose mouth may be heard in the Church of God
the consolation that is fitted to raise up those who are cast down, and to strengthen the feeble.



(104) “Comme si Dieu n’ cust rien veu.” “ if God had not at all seen it.”

(105) “Qui comprend en soy le regne de Christ jusqu’ a la fin du monde.” “ includes the reign of Christ till
the end of the world.”

 
8. J. VERNON MCGEE, ““Comfort ye, comfort ye.” The opening statement and its 
repetition is a sigh of yearning from  
the pulsating heart of God. Our God is the God of “all comfort.”  
Blessed be God, even the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of mercies, and the  
God of all comfort; who comforteth us in all our tribulation, that we may be able to  
comfort them which are in any trouble, by the comfort wherewith we ourselves are  
comforted of God (II Corinthians 1:3-4).  
The Holy Spirit is called “the comforter.”  
And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide  
with you for ever (John 14:16).  
The Lord Jesus Christ is likewise called “the comforter.”  
My little children, these things write I unto you, that ye sin not. And if any man sin, we  
have an advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous (I John 2:1).  
The word for “advocate” is the same as the one for “comforter.” God’s people in all ages 
need His comfort as they face the problems and perplexities of life. 
 
8B. CHARLES SIMEON. “
THE SCOPE AND TENDENCY OF THE GOSPEL
Isa_40:1?2. Comfort ye, comfort ye my people, saith your God. Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and 
cry unto her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned: for she hath received of the 
Lord’s hand double for all her sins. 
 
THE ministerial office is fitly compared to that of a steward, who divides to every one his proper portion
[Note: 2Ti_2:15. Luk_12:42.]. The execution of it calls for much wisdom and discretion, because there
must be a diversity both in the matter and manner of our addresses corresponding with the different
states of the people to whom we minister. To some we must of necessity proclaim the terrors of God’s
law, however painful such a discharge of our duty may be: but the great scope of our ministry is rather to
comfort the Lord’s people, and to “guide their feet into the way of peace.” The commission here given to
the servants of Jehovah, is very remarkable, being thrice repeated in one single verse. In this view of it I
am led particularly to shew,

I. How earnestly God desires the comfort and happiness of his people—

There are a people, chosen by the Father, redeemed by Christ, and sanctified by the Spirit, who are
eminently the Lord’s people [Note: Deu_7:6. 1Pe_2:9.]. And that God is peculiarly solicitous to promote
their comfort, appears,

1. From the commission which he gave to his beloved Son—

[He sent his Son into the world to execute his eternal counsels. And our Lord himself, in his first public
address to the people, declared, that the comfort of mourners was a principal object of his mission
[Note: Isa_41:1?3. Luk_4:17?19.].]

2. From the end for which he sends his Spirit into the hearts of men—

[God sends his Spirit to testify of Christ [Note: Joh_15:26.], to witness our adoption into his family
[Note: Rom_8:15.], and to seal us unto the day of redemption [Note: Eph_1:13?14.]. In performing these
offices he comforts our souls. And he is, on that very account, distinguished by the name of “the 
Comforter [Note:Joh_16:7.].”]

3. From the titles which the Father himself assumes—

[He calls himself “The God of consolation [Note: Rom_15:5.],” and “the Comforter of all them that are
“cast down [Note: 2Co_7:6.].” He compares his concern to that of a Father pitying his child
[Note: Psa_103:13.], and to a mother comforting with tenderest assiduities her afflicted infant
[Note: Isa_66:13.]. Yea, he assures us that his regards far exceed those of the most affectionate parent in
the universe [Note: Isa_49:15.].]

4. From the solemn charge he gives to ministers—

[He sends his servants “to turn men from darkness unto light, and from the power of Satan unto God
[Note: Act_26:18.].” And he especially charges them to “strengthen the weak hands, to confirm the feeble
Knees, and to say to them that are of a fearful heart, Be strong, fear not; your God will come and save
you [Note:Isa_35:3?4.].” Thrice is that injunction repeated in the text: and in the execution of this duty we
are justly called, “The helpers of your joy [Note: 2Co_1:24.].”]

5. From the dispensations both of his providence and grace—

[When he suffered his beloved Son to be tempted in all things like unto us, it was with a view to comfort
us under our temptations [Note: Heb_2:18.]. And when he comforted St. Paul under his multiplied
afflictions, he still consulted the comfort of his Church and people [Note: 2Co_1:3?4.]: yea, however he
diversified his dispensations, he had invariably the same gracious object in view [Note: 2Co_1:6.].]

As a further proof of his regard for our comfort, we may point out to you,

II. What abundant provision he has made for it in his word—

The message which we are commanded to deliver to his people, contains in it the richest sources of
consolation—

1. To God’s ancient people—

[To them primarily was this proclamation made. And it was verified in part, when they were delivered from
the Babylonish captivity and restored to the enjoyment of their former privileges in Jerusalem. But it was
yet further fulfilled, when, by the sending of their Messiah, they were delivered from the yoke of the
Mosaic law, which imposed a burthen which none of them were able to sustain. That, to those who
received him as their Messiah, was a season of exceeding great joy; for they were translated from the
kingdom of darkness into the kingdom of God’s clear Son, and from a state of insupportable bondage
“into the glorious liberty of the children of God.”

It will not however be fully accomplished, till they shall, in their national capacity, return from their present
dispersion, and be re?united, Israel with Judah, in their own land. Then will their warfare be as much
accomplished as it can be in this life: then will the tokens of God’s displeasure be removed from them;
and a state of prosperity be vouchsafed to them that shall far exceed all the sufferings they have ever
endured, and all the privileges they have ever enjoyed. At no time have they ever been punished beyond
their deserts; (their severest trials have been far less than their iniquities deserved:) but in that day shall
their blessings infinitely exceed all that they can now either contemplate or conceive — — —]

2. To his believing people, in every age—

[It is the true Christian alone who can form any just idea of the import of my text. “His warfare is
accomplished!” so far at least, as that he is in a state of victory over the world, and the flesh and the devil.
He can say, “Thanks be to God, who always causeth us to triumph in Christ.” “His sins too are blotted out
as a morning cloud,” and “put away from him as far as the east is from the west.” God has mercifully
“forgiven him all trespasses;” and he stands before God “without spot or blemish.” As for the blessings
vouchsafed to him, no words can possibly express them: his “peace passeth all understanding;” and his
“joy is unspeakable and full of glory.” “He has even now entered into rest [Note: Heb_4:3.],” according to
that promise given him by our Lord, “Come unto me, all ye that are weary and heavy?laden; and I will give
you rest” — — —]

See, then, Brethren,

1. What a wonderful difference exists between those who embrace, and those who disregard the
Gospel—

[Can that be said of carnal and worldly men, which is here spoken of the Lord’s people? Are their chains
broken? their sins forgiven? their comforts greater than any judgments that await them? No: they are yet
in bondage to sin and Satan; their sins are all “sealed up in a bag” against the day of judgment; and the
wrath of God is shortly coming upon them to the uttermost. Then it will appear how great a “difference
there is between those who serve the Lord, and those who serve him not [Note: Mal_3:18.].” Let not this
distinction then be made a subject of profane ridicule, but a motive to seek the Lord, that we may be
numbered with his people, and be made partakers of his benefits.]

2. What inconceivable blessedness awaits the Lord’s people in a better world!

[Even in this life, as we have seen, their blessedness is exceeding great. But what will it be when once
they shall lay down this mortal body, and enter into the joy of their Lord? Now conflicts remain even to
their latest hour; and whatever victories they may gain, they must still remain girt for the combat. And,
though “God has forgiven them all their trespasses,” so that he will never frown upon them in the eternal
world, they still have occasion daily to implore mercy at his hands on account of their short?comings and
defects. But in the day that they shall be taken into the immediate presence of their God, O! who can tell

us what they shall “receive at his hands?” — — — Dear Brethren, do not think lightly of that joy; but be
willing to sacrifice every thing for the attainment of it. Think in what estimation it is held by all who have
entered into the eternal world. What would tempt those in heaven to part with it? or what would not they
who are now in hell, give to be made partakers of it? Be assured, that it will be fully commensurate with
all your labours, though they had been a thousand times greater than they have; and that one single hour
of it will richly recompense all that it is possible for any finite creature either to do or suffer in the Saviour’s
cause — — —]

 
9. SBC. “
I. The text teaches us that there are certain things which hinder the spread of the 
Redeemer’s kingdom, spoken of here as valleys, hills, mountains, rough places, and crooked 
ways. The obstacles to the spread of the Redeemer’s kingdom are so numerous, that I must not 
even attempt to name them, but refer, as an illustration, to heathenism and idolatry abroad, and 
to ignorance and vice at home. The heathenism we are trying to remove; and that yawning valley 
of ignorance we are, by God’s grace, as a nation, trying to fill up; but our national vices, which 
are like mountains, we are also commanded by God to level and to remove. Take the vice of 
intemperance. (1) Intemperance hinders the progress of God’s kingdom at home. (2) It is also a 
hindrance to the spread of the Gospel abroad. How is it that though eighteen hundred years 
have passed since the Redeemer made His great provision, and gave us the command to carry 
the glad tidings to all, midnight darkness rests upon most of the human family? (a) There is a 
want of means.(b) There is a want of men. (c) There is a want of success on the part of those who 
are already in the field. With all those reasons strong drink has something to do. 
II. It is the duty of the Christian Church to sweep this mountain away. (1) The Church must, if 
she would hold her own. There is no neutrality in this war. (2) The Church must, if she would 
please her Master. 
III. The text puts before us the glorious result. "Thy kingdom come "is our cry. Here is God’s 
answer: "Set to work; lift up the valley, bring down the mountain, make the rough places plain 
and the crooked places straight, and then I will come." God waits for man. As soon as the Church 
is prepared to do the Lord’s bidding, the world shall be filled with His glory. 
C. Garrett, Loving Counsels, p. 142. 
 
 
 
The imagery of the text appears to be drawn from the journey-ings of Israel to Canaan. That 
great event in their national history was constantly before the mind of Isaiah, and is presented 
in his writings with ever-varying illustration. Let us 
I. Compare this prophecy with the history of the Exodus. The prophecies of God’s Word shine 
both before and behind. They not only illumine the darkness of futurity, but they reflect a 
radiance back on the page of history. So here. In the desert the Gospel was preached to Israel (as 
St. Paul says) in types and ordinances, and especially by that great act of their redemption out of 
Egypt. In this was a perpetual type of the Redeemer’s work of salvation, a foreshadowing of the 
inspired song, "Comfort ye, comfort ye My people, saith your God." In the ordinances given by 
the dispensation of angels might be heard "the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye 
the way for our God." 
II. Isaiah used the message as an illustration of his own ministry. He too, living now probably in 
the idolatrous reign of Manasseh, felt himself in a spiritual desert. Led by faith he sees afar off, 

and the seer is himself transported into that bright future. Just as heralds announced the 
coming of an Oriental king, and pioneers prepared his march across hill and vale and desert 
plains, so would Divine Providence lead His exiles home, removing all obstacles from their path, 
and overruling the designs of their enemies. 
III. The words of Isaiah certainly point on to Gospel times; for John the Baptist distinctly 
announced himself as "the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord." 
This preparation, in a spiritual sense, he accomplished by his personal ministry. 
IV. But even in John’s day the words had a wider signification. Not only the land of Israel, but 
the Gentile world, even all flesh, was then being prepared to see the salvation of God. 
Providential agencies were even then at work preparing Christ’s way among the Gentiles, as it 
were constructing a road for the march of Christianity through the desolate regions of 
heathendom. The two most powerful agencies were Greek literature and Roman dominion. 
V. The prophecy sheds a lustre on the world’s future. The Christ has indeed come to earth, but it 
was to suffer and to die. Once more in this wide desert the "glory of the Lord shall be revealed," 
and not one but "all lands shall see it together." 
S. P. Jose, Oxford and Cambridge Undergraduates’ Journal, May 13th, 1880. 
References: Isa_40:3-5.—A. Rowland, Christian World Pulpit, vol. xxi., p. 323; H. P. Liddon, 
Old Testament Outlines, p. 200. 
 
 
10. BI, “
The great prophecy of Israel’s restoration 
In passing from chaps, 36-39, to chap. 40. we find ourselves introduced into a new world. The 
persons whom the prophet addresses, the people amongst whom he lives and moves, whose 
feelings he portrays, whose doubts he dispels, whose faith he confirms, are not the inhabitants of 
Jerusalem under Ahaz, or Hezekiah, or Manasseh, but the Jewish exiles in Babylonia. Jerusalem 
and the Temple are in ruins (
Isa_44:10), and have been so for long Isa_58:12; Isa_61:4 —the 
“old waste places”): the proud and imposing Babylonian empire is to all appearance as secure as 
ever; the exiles are in despair or indifferent; they think that God has forgotten them, and have 
ceased to expect, or desire, their release (Isa_40:27; Isa_49:14; Isa_49:24). Toarouse the 
indifferent, to reassure the wavering, to expostulate with the doubting, to announce with 
triumphant confidence the certainty of the approaching restoration, is the aim of the great 
prophecy which now occupies the last twenty-seven chapters of the Book of Isaiah. (Prof. S. R.
Driver, D. D.) 
 
 
The Gospel of Isaiah 
Here beginneth the Gospel of the prophet Isaiah, and holdeth on to the end of the book. (J.
Trapp.) 
 
 
Does Isa_40:1-31. treat of the return from Babylon? 
The specific application of this chapter to the return from Babylon is without the least 
foundation in the text itself. The promise is a general one of consolation, protection, and change 
for the better, to be wrought by the power and wisdom of Jehovah, which are contrasted, first, 
with those of men, of nations, and of rulers, then with the utter impotence of idols. That the 

ultimate fulfilment of the promise was still distant, is implied in the exhortation to faith and 
patience. The reference to idolatry proves nothing with respect to the date of the prediction, 
although more appropriate in the writings of Isaiah than of a prophet in the Babylonish Exile. It 
is evidently meant, however, to condemn idolatry in general, and more particularly all the 
idolatrous defections of the Israelites under the old economy. (J. A. Alexander, D. D.) 
 
 
A comforting message 
There is evident allusion to the threatening in Isa_39:7. Having there predicted the captivity in 
Babylon, as one of the successive strokes by which the fate of Israel as a nation and the total loss 
of its peculiar privileges should be brought about, the prophet is now sent to assure the spiritual 
Israel, the true people of Jehovah, that although the Jewish nation should not cease to be 
externally identified with the Church, the Church itself should not only continue to exist, but in a 
far more glorious state than ever. (J. A. Alexander, D. D.) 
 
 
God’s return to a pardoned people 
The beginning of the good tidings is Israel s pardon; yet it seems not to be the people’s return to 
Palestine which is announced in consequence of this, so much as their God’s return to them. 
“Prepare ye the way of Jehovah, make straight a highway for our God. Behold, the Lord Jehovah 
will come.” (Prof. G. A. Smith, D. D.) 
 
 
“My” people; “your” God 
All the prophecy we are about to study may be said to hang from these pronouns. They are the 
hinges on which the door of this new temple of revelation swings open before the long-expectant 
people. (Prof. G. A. Smith, D. D.) 
 
 
A storehouse of Divine promise 
This portion (chaps. 40-66.) of the great prophet’s writings may well be regarded as the Old 
Testament Store house and Repertory of “exceeding great and precious promises,” in which 
Jehovah would seem to anticipate His own special Gospel name as “the God of all comfort.” (J.
R. Macduff, D. D.) 
 
 
Jehovah and His Church 
1. A glorious change awaits the Church, consisting in a new and gracious manifestation of 
Jehovah’s presence, for which His people are exhorted to prepare (Isa_40:1-5). 
2. Though one generation perish after another, this promise shall eventually be fulfilled, 
because it rests not upon human but Divine authority (Isa_40:6-8). 
3. Zion may even now see Him approaching as the conqueror of His enemies, and at the 
same time as the Shepherd of His people (Isa_40:9-11). 
4. The fulfilment of these pledges is insured by His infinite wisdom, His almighty power, 
and His independence both of individuals and nations (Isa_40:12-17). 

5. How much more is He superior to material images, by which men represent Him or 
supply His place (Isa_40:18-25). 
6. The same power which sustains the heavens is pledged for the support of Israel 
(Isa_40:26-31). (J. A. Alexander.) 
 
 
“Comfort ye, comfort ye” 
The double utterance of the “Comfort ye,” is the well-known Hebrew expression of emphasis, 
abundance, intensity;—“Great comfort, saith your God.” (J. R. Macduff, D. D.) 
 
 
God’s great comfort 
At the close of the prophecy, the prophet tells us what the strength and abundance of that 
comfort is. Earth’s best picture of strong consolation is that of the mother bending over the 
couch of her suffering and sorrowing child (Isa_66:13). (J. R. Macduff, D. D.) 
 
 
A Divine art 
When the soul is in the period of its exile and bitter pain, it should do three things. 
I. LOOK OUT FOR COMFORT. 
1. It will come certainly. Wherever the nettle grows, beside it grows the dock-leaf; and 
wherever there is severe trial, there is, somewhere at hand, a sufficient store of comfort, 
though our eyes, like Hagar’s, are often holden that we cannot see it. It is as sure as the 
faithfulness of God. “I never had,” says Bunyan, writing of his twelve years’ imprisonment, 
“in all my life, so great an insight into the Word of God as now; insomuch that I have often 
said, Were it lawful, I could pray for greater trouble, for the greater comforts’ sake.” God 
cannot forget His child. 
2. It will come proportionately. Thy Father holds a pair of scales. This on the right is called 
As, and is for thine afflictions; this on the left is called So, and is for thy comforts. And the 
beam is always kept level The more thy trial, the more thy comfort. As the sufferings of 
Christ abound in us, so our consolation also aboundeth through Christ. 
3. It will come Divinely. God reserves to Himself the prerogative of comfort. It is a Divine 
art. 
4. It will come mediately. What the prophet was as the spokesman of Jehovah, uttering to 
the people in human tones the inspirations that came to him from God, so to us is the great 
prophet, whose shoe-latchet the noblest of the prophetic band was not worthy to unloose; 
and our comfort is the sweeter because it reaches us through Him. 
5. It will come variously. Sometimes by the coming of a beloved Titus; a bouquet; a bunch of 
grapes; a letter; a message; a card. There are many strings in the dulcimer of consolation. In 
sore sorrow it is not what a friend says, but what he is, that helps us. He comforts best who 
says least, but simply draws near, takes the sufferer’s hand, and sits silent in his sympathy. 
This is God’s method. 
II. STORE UP COMFORT. This was the prophet’s mission. He had to receive before he could 
impart. Thy own life becomes the hospital ward where thou art taught the Divine art of comfort. 

Thou art wounded, that in the binding up of thy wounds by the Great Physician thou mayest 
learn how to render first-aid to the wounded everywhere. 
III. PASS ON COMFORT. (F. B. Meyer, B. A.) 
 
 
The Divine ministry of comfort 
There are ministries in the world. 
1. There is the Divine ministry of instruction. In this ministry nature, history, and the Bible 
are constantly employed. 
2. There is the Divine ministry of Justice. Nemesis is always and everywhere at work, 
treading on the heels of wrong, and inflicting penalties. 
3. In the text we have the Divine ministry of comfort. The words suggest three thoughts 
concerning this ministry. 
I. It implies the existence of DISTRESS. Bright and fair as the material world often appears, a 
sea of sorrow rolls through human souls The distress is of various kinds. 
1. Physical suffering. 
2. Social bereavement. 
3. Secular anxieties. 
4. Moral compunction. 
II. It implies the existence of SPECIAL MEANS. All this distress is an abnormal state of things. 
Misery is not an institution of nature, and the creation of God, but the production of the 
creature. To meet this abnormal state something more than natural instrumentality is required. 
1. There must be special provisions. Those provisions are to be found in the Gospel. To the 
physically afflicted there are presented considerations fitted to energise the soul, endow it 
with magnanimity, fill it with sentiments and hopes that will raise it, if not above the sense 
of physical suffering, above its depressing influence. To the socially, bereaved it brings the 
glorious doctrine of a future life. To the secularly distressed it unfolds the doctrine of eternal 
providence. In secular disappointments and anxieties it says, “Your heavenly Father 
knoweth that ye have need of these things.” 
2. There must be special agency. A physician may know the disease of his patient, but if he 
does not know the precise mode of application he will not succeed. So it is with the Gospel. A 
man to give comfort to another requires a special qualification. The comforting elements 
must be administered— 
(1) Not officially, but humanly. 
(2) Not verbosely, but sympathetically. 
III. It implies a LIMITED SPHERE. “My people.” The whole human family is in distress, but 
there is only a certain class qualified to receive comfort, those who are here called God’s 
“people,” and who are they? Those who have surrendered themselves to His will, yielded to His 
claims, and dedicated themselves to His service. (D. Thomas, D. D.) 
 
 
Comfort for God’s people 

I. THE SPEAKER. It is the God of comfort, the God of all comfort that here speaks comfortably 
to His people. There is a danger of our thinking too much of comfort, and one may only value 
the word preached as it administers comfort; this is a great error, because all Scripture is 
profitable for doctrine, and reproof, as well as for comfort. One great end which even the 
Scriptures have in view, is not only to lead us to patience in suffering, but to comfort us under 
suffering. It is one thing for man to speak comfort, it is another thing for God to speak comfort. 
II. THE PERSONS THAT ARE HERE SPOKEN TO. “Comfort ye, com fort ye My people.” 
1. The Lord has a people upon earth—He has never been without a people. 
2. The Lord has a people; and if He has a people He will try them, and they shall not be 
found summer flies just resting on the surface of things, but they shall be found to be those 
that know the truth in the power of it, and they shall be made to feel and experience the 
worth of it. It shall not be enough for them to say, I am a sinner, but they shall feel the 
wretchedness of being a sinner, they shall not only confess that Christ is precious, but they 
shall be placed where they shall know Him to be precious. 
3. The Lord has a people; and it is a most blessed consideration to reflect that while He has a 
people, He is their God. Talk not of your wretchedness and your poverty and your disease, of 
your weakness; if God be your God, not only heaven is your home, but you have that without 
which heaven would not be worth the having. 
4. God has a people; no wonder then He comforts them—His eye is upon them from the 
beginning to the end of the year. They are the salt of the earth to Him, and he that touches 
them touches the apple of His eye. 
III. THE LORD’S MESSAGE UNTO HIS MINISTERS. “Comfort ye, ” etc. The-great cause of 
comfort to a child of God may be summed up in a little sentence—through eternity he never shall 
come to the close of it. Let me point out some few of those great mercies that flow to a child of 
God in consequence of his having Christ as his portion. 
1. He has that which made David glad (Psa_32:1-2). The great contest Satan has with our 
consciences is about the pardon of our sins. Well might the people of God then be comforted 
by this truth, that their sins have all been blotted out as a cloud. 
2. Do you ask for another ground of comfort? See it in a covenant, ordered in all things 
(2Sa_23:5). 
3. But the Psalmist found another source of comfort. “It is good for me to draw near to God” 
(Psa_73:1-28.). There is no mercy on earth greater than to have a God in heaven, to have an 
Intercessor at the right hand; to have the heart of God; to have the promise of God: to have 
Jehovah Himself as my portion. 
4. One comfort more is the bright prospect that is before the child of God. (J. H.Evans, M.
A.) 
 
 
Comfort for Zion 
It was once said by Vinet, that the three great objects of the preacher were the illumination, 
consolation, and regeneration of men. The work of comforting is surely an important one, but it 
is God’s people whom we are to comfort. We are not to say, Peace, peace! where there is no 
peace. Stoical indifference is not real comfort, but peace alone is found in God. 

I. Notice what a discovery is made in the text of GOD’S NATURE. He has not hidden away from 
men; He is not asleep or tied down by law, but His tender mercies are over all His works. He is 
near to every one of us, seeking our love and confidence. 
II. HUMAN SOULS NEED COMFORT. Constitutional characteristics render us susceptible to 
consolatory truths. Even those hardened in sin have been melted by a woman’s tears, or have 
yielded to the persuasiveness of a child. 
III. Look at the GROUNDS ON WHICH THIS COMFORT IS ADMINI STERED. Not those of 
philosophy. When the Greeks, under Xenophon, caught sight of the Euxine, they jubilantly 
cried, “The sea, the sea!” The discoveries of Divine grace—a sea without a bottom or a shore—
elicit profounder joy. (G. Norcross, D. D.) 
 
 
“Comfort ye, comfort ye My people 
The words of this passage (1-11) look on to the captivity. The people, afflicted, chastened, broken 
in spirit, are called upon to listen to the strains of consolation which God had breathed for them 
in His word. I venture to think that they were laden with a richer consolation in that they came 
down a vista of nearly two hundred years. Old words are precious to mourners. That which is 
spoken at the moment is apt to be coloured by the thoughts and the doubts of the moment; an 
old word spoken out of the region of these present sorrows has double force. It seems to bring 
that which is absolute and universal to bear on that which is present and passing. This is why the 
Scripture is so precious to mourners. It belongs to all time. And these words rule all its 
declarations. It is comfort throughout and to the end. The mercies of judgment is a subject we 
too little study. Yet mercy is the deepest element in every judgment with which God afflicts 
mankind. Stern, hard, unfaltering to the eye, but full of rich mercy to the heart. It was in tender 
mercy that man, the sinner, was sent forth to labour. In society we see on a large scale how God’s 
judgments are blessings in disguise. Great epidemics are healing ordinances. They purify the 
vital springs. They leave a purer, stronger health when their dread shadow has passed by. 
Catastrophes in history are like thunderstorms; they leave a fresher, brighter atmosphere. 
Reigns of terror are the gates through which man passes out into a wider world. May we pray, 
then, in calamities for deliverance, when they are so likely to be blessings? Yes, for prayer is the 
blessed refuge of our ignorance and dread. But Isaiah had the profoundest right to speak o| 
comfort, because he could speak of the advent of the Redeemer to the world. He not only 
preaches comfort, but discloses the source from which it springs—“Emmanuel, God with us.” (J.
B. Brown, B. A.) 
 
 
Divine comfort 
1. Living in the midst of sorrow, and himself personally its victim, the Christian has need of 
comfort. Whatever form the affliction may take, it is hard for flesh and blood to bear; it runs 
contrary to all the tastes and desires of the natural man. Often under its pressure, especially 
when long continued and severe, is he tempted to faint and despond; it may be, even to 
repine and murmur; to doubt the faith fulness of God; to ask, in bitterness of heart, why 
such woe is appointed to man? 
2. With what power, then, do words like these reach him in the midst of his sorrow, coming 
from God Himself, “Comfort ye, comfort ye My people!” No sooner are they heard than hope 
revives, and the assurance of Divine sympathy at once soothes his trouble, and allays his 
fears. 

(1) Here is the first light from heaven which breaks upon human sorrow, and which 
removes from it, for the Christian, its keenest sting. God knows your suffering and thinks 
of it, and seeks to comfort you under it. You are not the sport of inexorable fate, or blind 
and reckless chance; still less are your afflictions proof that God has abandoned you in 
wrath. 
(2) How sweet is the solace of human sympathy! But here we have Divine sympathy; 
sympathy from One both able and willing to deliver,—from the God of all comfort. 
(3) Not afar off, does the voice of God reach us, from an inaccessible heaven, telling us 
we are His people and that He cares for us. He has come and made us His people, by 
taking our nature, and being born and living as a man. (J. N. Bennie, LL. B.) 
 
 
I. GOD HAS A PEOPLE IN THE WORLD. 
The Lord’s people comforted 
II. I proceed TO COMPLY WITH THE INJUNCTION IN THE TEX T. To this end, I will 
endeavour to obviate some few of the most common causes of that want of comfort to which the 
people of God are liable. 
1. One cause is their misunderstanding the nature and extent of that pardon of sin, which 
the Gospel provides. 
2. Another cause arises from their seeking comfort where it is not to be found. You can never 
find it from poring into your own hearts. Look in faith to Jesus Christ—His glorious person 
and gracious offices, etc. 
3. Another cause arises from their mistaking the proofs and marks of a really religious state. 
They suppose that it consists in warm and rapturous feelings. Your salvation is grounded on 
the faithfulness of Him who cannot lie. (E. Cooper.) 
 
 
The trials of business men 
These words came to the prophet in the olden time, but they come just as forcibly to any man 
who stands to-day in any one of the pulpits of our great cities. A preacher has no more right to 
ignore commercial sorrows than any other kind of sorrow. 
I. A great many of our business men feel ruinous trials and temptations coming to them FROM 
SMALL AND LIMITED CAPITAL IN BUSINESS. This temptation of limited capital has ruined 
men in two ways. Despondency has blasted them. Others have said, “Here I have been trudging 
along. I have been trying, to be honest all these years. I find it is of no use. Now it is make or 
break. 
II. A great many of our business men are tempted to OVER-ANXIETY AND CARE. God 
manages all the affairs of your life, and He manages them for the best. 
III. Many of our business men are tempted TO NEGLECT THEIR HOME DUTIES. How often it 
is that the store and the home seem to clash, but there ought not to be any collision. If you want 
to keep your children away from places of sin, you can only do it by making your home 
attractive. We need more happy, consecrated, cheerful Christian homes. 
IV. A great many of our business men are tempted to PUT THE ATTAINMENT OF MONEY 
ABOVE THE VALUE OF THE SOUL. The more money you get, the better if it come honestly 

and go usefully. But money cannot satisfy a man’s soul; it cannot glitter in the dark valley; it 
cannot pay our fare across the Jordan of death; it cannot unlock the gate of heaven. 
Treasures in heaven are the only uncorruptible treasures. Have you ever ciphered out in the rule 
of Loss and Gain the sum, “What shall it profit a man if he gain the whole world and lose his 
soul?” Seek after God; find His righteousness, and all shall be well here and hereafter. (T.
DeWitt Talmage, D. D.) 
 
 
Religious comfort 
I. SHOW WHAT THE COMFORT IS which the Gospel of our Lord conveys to mankind. 
Whenever we speak of comforting another, the very expression implies that he is in tribulation 
and distress. Without the Gospel of Christ the condition of men must be wretched. 
II. DESCRIBE THE PERSONS WHO ARE AUTHORISED TO TAKE THAT  COMFORT TO 
THEMSELVES. Evangelical obedience is to be the foundation of evangelical comfort. (T.
Gisborne.) 
 
 
Comfort for God’s people 
“Comfort ye My people”— 
1. By reminding them that I am their God. 
2. By reminding them that their captivity in this world is nearly over, and that they will soon 
be home. 
3. The Saviour is coming to this world, and is on His way to show His glory here. He will 
come and fill the world with His victories. (C. Stanford, D. D.) 
 
 
Comfort proclaimed 
What a sweet title: “My people!” What a cheering revelation: “Your God!” How much of meaning 
is couched in those two words, “My people!” Here is speciality. The whole world is God’s. But He 
saith of a certain number, “My people.” While nations and kindreds are passed by as being 
simply nations, He says of them. “My people.” In this word there is the idea of proprietorship. In 
some special manner the “Lord’s portion Is His people; Jacob is the lot of His inheritance.” He 
has done more for them than others; He has brought them nigh to Himself. How careful God is 
of His people; mark how anxious He is concerning them, not only for their life, but for their 
comfort. He would not only have us His living people, His preserved people, but He would have 
us be His happy people too. He likes His people to be fed, but what is more, He likes to give 
them “wines on the lees well refined,” to make glad their hearts. 
I. TO WHOM IS THIS COMMAND ADDRESSED? The Holy Spirit  is the great Comforter, and 
He it is who alone can solace the saints; but He uses instruments to relieve His children in their 
distress and to lift up their hearts from desperation. To whom, then, is this command 
addressed? 
1. To angels, first of all. You often talk about the insinuations of the devil. Allow me to 
remind you that there is another side of that question, for if evil spirits assault us, doubtless 
good spirits guard us. It is my firm belief that angels are often employed by God to throw 
into the hearts of His people comforting thoughts. 

2. But on earth this is more especially addressed to the Lord’s ministers. The minister 
should ask of God the Spirit, that he may be filled with His influence as a comforter. 
3. But do not support your ministers as an excuse for the discharge of your own duties; 
many do so. When God said, “Comfort ye, comfort ye My people,” He spake to all His people 
to comfort one another. 
II. WHAT ARE THE REASONS FOR THIS COMMAND? 
1. Because God loves to see His people look happy. The Roman Catholic supposes that God 
is pleased with a man if he whips himself, walks barefooted for many miles, and torments his 
body. When I am by the seaside, and the tide is coming in, I see what appears to be a little 
fringe, looking almost like a mist; and I ask a fisherman what it is. He tells me there is no 
mist there; and that what I see are all little shrimps dancing in ecstasy, throwing themselves 
in convulsions and contortions of delight. I think within myself, “Does God make those 
creatures happy, and did He make me to be miserable? Can it ever be a religious thing to be 
unhappy?” No; true religion is in harmony with the whole world; it is in harmony with the 
whole sun and moon and stars, and the sun shines and the stars twinkle; the world has 
flowers in it and leaping hills and carolling birds; it has joys in it; and I hold it to be an 
irreligious thing to go moping miserably through God’s creation. 
2. Because uncomfortable Christians dishonour religion. 
3. Because a Christian in an uncomfortable state cannot work for God much. It is when the 
mind is happy that it can be laborious. 
4. Again, “Comfort ye” God’s people, because ye profess to love them. 
III. God never gives His children a duty without giving them THE MEANS TO DO IT. Let me 
just hint at those things in the everlasting Gospel which have a tendency to comfort the saints. 
Whisper in the mourner’s ear electing grace, and redeeming mercy, and dying love. Tell him that 
God watcheth the furnace as the goldsmith the refining pot. If that does not suffice, tell him of 
his present mercies; tell him that he has much left, though much is gone. Tell him that Jesus is 
above, wearing the breast-plate, or pleading his cause. Tell him that though earth’s pillars shake, 
God is a refuge for us; tell the mourner that the everlasting God faileth not, neither is weary. Let 
present facts suffice thee to cheer him. But if this is not enough, tell him of the future; whisper to 
him that there is a heaven with pearly gates and golden streets. (C. H. Spurgeon.) 
 
 
Comfort for England 
I will make one little change in the translation, taking the words of Dr. George Adam Smith, 
“Speak ye to the heart of Jerusalem.” “Comfort ye, comfort ye My people, saith your God! Speak 
ye to the heart of England, and cry unto her that her warfare is accomplished.” Had the Hebrew 
prophets no other claim upon our regard we ought to hold them in everlasting respect for their 
patriotism. For Israel the prophet thought a man might well die. Israel was also God’s people. 
The strength of Israel in every time of trouble was the Lord of hosts. And the prophet’s interest 
was not confined to the sacrifices of the temple, nor to the coteries of pious people, but swept 
into its heart everything that concerned the welfare of the community. 
1. Why should not our faith go farther afield and have a more generous range? We also carry 
in our hearts, not only as citizens, but also as Christians, this England which God gave to our 
fathers, and has continued in its glory unto their children. Why should we not take our 
courage in both our hands and, looking at the history of the past and comparing it with the 
history of the present, recognise in our own people another Israel called of God in a special 
manner, set apart by God for a special mission, and gather into our soul all the promises of 

God, and also make our boast in Him as the prophets did? What did they depend on, the 
Hebrew prophets, for this great conception that God had called the nation, and had a great 
work for that nation to do? They depended on the facts of history behind them creating in 
their soul an irresistible conviction. And I ask you whether the right arm of the Most High 
has not been as conspicuous in English history? From what perils in past centuries has He 
not delivered this country when the whole world was against us and was put to confusion! 
Have not we been surrounded by the sea, our national character formed, for purposes that 
we can recognise? What nation has ever planted so many colonies, explored so many 
unknown lands, made such practical contributions to civilisation, set such an illustrious 
example of liberty? 
Within our blood is the genius for government, the passion for justice, the love of adventure, and 
the intelligence of pure faith. Our Lord came of the Jewish stock, and therefore that people must 
have a lonely place, but when it comes to the carrying out of those great blessings, physical, 
political, social, and religious, which have been conferred upon the world by the Cross and the 
pierced hand of the Lord, I challenge anyone to say whether any nation has so extended them 
within her own borders, or been so willing to give them to the ends of the earth as God’s 
England. 
2. I do not forget England’s sins, for we have sinned in our own generation by inordinate 
love of material possessions, by discord between the classes of the commonwealth, by a 
certain insolence which has offended foreign peoples, and also by hideous sins of the flesh. 
Our sins have been great, and it becomes us to acknowledge them. Does our sin destroy our 
calling? Does our sin break the Covenant which the Eternal made with our fathers? No 
people ever sinned against God like Israel. And between the sin of Israel and the sin of 
England, God’s chosen people of ancient and modern times, there has been the similarity 
which arises from the sin of people in the same position. Both boasted themselves over-
much against other peoples. Both were intoxicated with prosperity. Both depended upon it 
instead of utilising and conserving the favour of the Most High. When we desire to confess 
our sins where do we go? We go to the confessions of the Hebrew prophets. And when we 
ask mercy for our sins, what are the promises we plead? The great promise of mercy declared 
by the evangelical prophet and now sealed by the life and death and resurrection of our 
Lord! Because the Hebrew prophet believed that his people were God’s people, he had the 
courage to speak plainly to them. He is not a traitor to his country who on occasions points 
out his country’s sins. When Israel sinned there was no voice so loud as that of Isaiah or 
Amos, but they delighted not in the work, any more than their God delighted in judgment. If 
God sent them with a rod they took the rod and gave the stroke, but the stroke fell also on 
the prophet’s own heart, and he suffered most of all the people. When the people repented 
and turned again to God, when they brought forth works meet for repentance and showed 
humility, there was no man so glad as the prophet. 
3. When the prophet takes up the work of consolation he has no bounds, he makes the 
comfort of God to run down the streets like a river. It is not enough to say it once, but twice 
must he sound it, till the comfort of God shall run like lightning through Jerusalem. And 
when he takes to comforting he is not to be bound by theories of theology or arguments of 
the schools. He is not going to ask questions—whether a man can expiate his sins, or 
whether a nation can win repentance. He flings all this kind of argument to the wind, for he 
has come out from the presence of the Eternal, who does not keep accounts like that, and he 
cries, “Speak ye home to Jerusalem; her warfare is accomplished.” Accomplished! More than 
that! God hath now repented! It was His people repented first, now He is repenting. They 
repented of their sins; behold, God has begun to repent of His judgment! “I have,” he makes 
the Eternal say—“I have been over-hard with these people, and I have punished them more 
than they have deserved. Go and comfort them. Comfort them royally. Give it out with a 

lavish hand—they have received double for all their sins.” When the prophet speaks in this 
fashion he is not referring to material prosperity, for the words were spoken to the exiles in 
Babylon. He comforted the exiles because they had repented and been reconciled unto God. 
The comfort I preach is not based on arms. It is based on the nobler spirit which God has 
given England during the progress of the war in South Africa. We sinned, and according to 
our sin was our punishment. We have repented. Through our churches and through our 
homes, and individually, we have laid the lessons of the Eternal to heart; and according to 
our repentance shall be the blessing of God. (J. Watson, M. A.) 
 
 
“Comfort ye My people” 
This command is adapted to the needs of the country in which we live. There is a good deal of 
weariness and depression in modem life. If the blessings of an advanced civilisation can make 
people happy, there are multitudes who ought to be enraptured, for they are surrounded by 
material comfort. The gospel of recreation is preached to them. Outward nature is enjoyed and 
reverenced. Music and painting are filling them with sensibility; literature is contributing to 
their intellectual gratification; and church privileges abound. Worship to-day gratifies the 
artistic faculty, without putting a very great strain on the spiritual nature of man. There never 
was so much ingenuity displayed as now in the manufacture of forms of enjoyment. People 
never waged such a successful war as to-day against physical and social discomfort. And yet, if 
you watch them closely, you can see that they are not really satisfied. Affection to-day is not at 
rest, intellect is not at rest, conscience is not at rest, faith is not at rest. Thank God, there is 
sweet satisfaction of soul to be found. “Comfort ye,” etc. 
I. There is a message in this text for ALL WHO ARE UNDER DISCIPLINE ON ACCOUNT OF 
SIN. The connection between sin and punishment is never really broken. Men were never so 
clever as they are to-day in the efforts they have put forth to evade the penalties of wrong-doing, 
and they very often succeed so far as outward effects are concerned, But the inward penalty is 
always sure. Loss of self-respect, loss of faculty, and deterioration of nature itself. “Thy warfare 
is accomplished,” thy discipline may come to an end. It is the spirit of rebellion which lengthens 
the period of discipline. Lay down your weapons, give up fighting against God, and He will 
forgive you now, and the consequences of your wrongdoing shall inwardly be done away. 
Further, your pardon will tell at once on the outward consequences of your wrong-doing. You 
forfeited the confidence of your friends by your sin; that will come back to you. You damaged 
your health; that will improve. You injured your social position; that will be retrieved. Just as 
there is no decree in God’s mind as to the length of time during which a man’s discipline shall be 
continued, so there is no decree as to the amount of suffering man can endure. The suffering, 
like the time, may be relieved by speedy submission and penitence. 
II. There is a message in this text for ALL WHO IN RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE HAVE NEVER 
GOT BEYOND CONVICTION. Beyond conviction there is the forgiveness of God. Beyond the sin 
there is purity. Beyond doubt there is faith; and beyond all this miserable weariness of spirit 
there is rest. 
III. There is a message here, also, for ALL TIMID CHRISTIANS. They feel it would be 
presumption to expect conscious pardon and Christian perfection. Cultivate your capacity to 
take in the comfort of God. 
IV. There is a message here for ALL DISCONSOLATE CHRISTIANS. You want new ideas, the 
old ones are about worn out. Thy warfare with weariness is accomplished. 
V. There is a message here for DISCONSOLATE CHURCHES. The Jewish Church was 
disconsolate at the time of the captivity, and there are Churches to-day which are in a sort of 

captivity. They have made exceptional provision for the needs of the people, yet they are 
declining. The declension of Churches in great populations is due to many causes, but due to one 
cause that is a great deal overlooked, and that is the very peculiar temperament of the 
generation in which your lot has been east. Competition, in particular, has led to a vast amount 
of advertising. But disconsolate Churches may be comforted. We are coming out of the captivity 
of those habits and conditions which have come down from the restrictive ages of society. 
Modern evangelism has grown steadily in the elements of truth and spiritual intelligence. It is 
resulting to-day in the deepening of spiritual life, and in the expansion of the kingdom of God. 
VI. There is a message here for THE NATION AND THE EMPIRE. The return from captivity 
was the beginning of a new spiritual movement, which was destined to extend over many 
countries. The classical period of human history was about to begin. My text is the new strain 
with which the prophet greets the expanding prospect. As one has said, It is the keynote of the 
revived and purified Israel, and the reason of the hold of Christendom on Europe and on 
modern times. There is a wonderful correspondence between that period and ours. England is 
the centre to-day. Judaism at the time referred to was rational-ised by being brought into 
contact with forms of Roman and Greek thought. Christianity is being rationalised by contact 
with natural religion. But who is the leader of the improvement of the modern world? “Who is 
this that cometh from Edom?” etc. (chap. 63:1). Was it some king ruling the nations with a rod 
of iron? No. Some soldier with a two-edged sword? No. Some philosopher ruling the intellect of 
the race? No. Jehovah s righteous servant and witness it was: “that speak in righteousness, 
mighty to save.” And the Lord Christ, the Son of God, never spoke to the race as He is speaking 
to-day, and He needs His messengers to prepare His way. (T. Allen, D. D.) 
 
 
Conviction and comfort 
A quaint Scotch preacher said that the needle of the law opens the way for and carries the thread 
of the Gospel. I once quoted this saying in a tent-meeting, and a hearer remarked to me 
afterwards: “Yes, you’re right; but the needle should be pulled out and not left behind.” (H. G.
Guinness, D. D.) 
 
 
 
10. EBC, “THE DATE OF ISAIAH 40-66  
THE problem of the date of Isaiah 40-66 is this: In a book called by the name of the prophet 
Isaiah, who flourished between 740 and 700 B.C., the last twenty-seven chapters deal with the 
captivity suffered by the Jews in Babylonia from 598 to 538, and more particularly with the 
advent, about 550, of Cyrus, whom they name. Are we to take for granted that Isaiah himself 
prophetically wrote these chapters, or must we assign them to a nameless author or authors of 
the period of which they treat? 
Till the end of the last century it was the almost universally accepted tradition, and even still is 
an opinion retained by many, that Isaiah was carried forward by the Spirit, out of his own age to 
the standpoint of one hundred and fifty years later; that he was inspired to utter the warning 
and comfort required by a generation so very different from his own, and was even enabled to 
hail by name their redeemer, Cyrus. This theory, involving as it does a phenomenon without 
parallel in the history of Holy Scripture, is based on these two grounds: first, that the chapters in 
question form a considerable part-nearly nine-twentieths-of the Book of Isaiah; and second, that 
portions of them are quoted in the New Testament by the prophet’s name. The theory is also 

supported by arguments drawn from resemblances of style and vocabulary between these 
twenty-seven chapters and the undisputed oracles of Isaiah but, as the opponents of the Isaian 
authorship also appeal to vocabulary and style, it will be better to leave this kind of evidence 
aside for the present, and to discuss the problem upon other and less ambiguous grounds. 
The first argument, then, for the Isaian authorship of chapters 40-66 is that they form part of a 
book called by Isaiah’s name. But, to be worth anything, this argument must rest on the 
following facts: that everything in a book called by a prophet’s name is necessarily by that 
prophet, and that the compilers of the book intended to hand it down as altogether from his pen. 
Now there is no evidence for either of these conclusions. On the contrary, there is considerable 
testimony in the opposite direction. The Book of Isaiah is not one continuous prophecy. It 
consists of a number of separate orations, with a few intervening pieces of narrative. Some of 
these orations claim to be Isaiah’s own: they possess such titles as "The vision of Isaiah the son 
of Amoz." But such titles describe only the individual prophecies they head, and other portions 
of the book, upon other subjects and in very different styles, do not possess titles at all. It seems 
to me that those who maintain the Isaian authorship of the whole book have the responsibility 
cast upon them of explaining why some chapters in it should be distinctly said to be by Isaiah, 
while others should not be so entitled. Surely this difference affords us sufficient ground for 
understanding that the whole book is not necessarily by Isaiah, nor intentionally handed down 
by its compilers as the work of that prophet. 
Now, when we come to chapters 40-66, we find that, occurring in a book which we have just 
seen no reason for supposing to be in every part of it by Isaiah, these chapters nowhere claim to 
be his. They are separated from that portion of the book, in which his undisputed oracles are 
placed, by a historical narrative of considerable length. And there is not anywhere upon them 
nor in them a title nor other statement that they are by the prophet, nor any allusion which 
could give the faintest support to the opinion, that they offer themselves to posterity as dating 
from his time. It is safe to say, that, if they had come to us by themselves, no one would have 
dreamt for an instant of ascribing them to Isaiah; for the alleged resemblances, which their 
language and style bear to his language and style, are far more than overborne by the undoubted 
differences, and have never been employed, even by the defenders of the Isaian authorship, 
except in additional and confessedly slight support of their main argument, viz., that the 
chapters must be Isaiah’s because they are included in a book called by his name. 
Let us understand, therefore, at this very outset, that in discussing the question of the 
authorship of "Second Isaiah," we are not discussing a question upon which the text itself makes 
any statement, or into which the credibility of the text enters. No claim is made by the Book of 
Isaiah itself for the Isaian authorship of chapters 40-66. 
A second fact in Scripture, which seems at first sight to make strongly for the unity of the Book 
of Isaiah, is that in the New Testament, portions of the disputed chapters are quoted by Isaiah’s 
name, just as are portions of his admitted prophecies. These citations are nine in number. 
(Mat_3:3, Mat_8:17, Mat_12:17, Luk_3:4, Luk_4:17, Joh_1:23, Joh_12:38, Act_8:28, 
Rom_10:16-20) None is by our Lord Himself. They occur in the Gospels, Acts, and Paul. Now if 
any of these quotations were given in answer to the question, Did Isaiah write chapters 40-66 of 
the book called by his name? or if the use of his name along with them were involved in the 
arguments which they are borrowed to illustrate as, for instance, is the case with David’s name 
in the quotation made by our Lord from Psa_110:1-7, then those who deny the unity of the Book 
of Isaiah would be face to face with a very serious problem indeed. But in none of the nine cases 
is the authorship of the Book of Isaiah in question. In none of the nine cases is there anything in 
the argument, for the purpose of which the quotation has been made, that depends on the 
quoted words being by Isaiah. For the purposes for which the Evangelists and Paul borrow the 
texts, these might as well be unnamed, or attributed to any other canonical writer. Nothing in 

them requires us to suppose that Isaiah’s name is mentioned with them for any other end than 
that of reference, viz., to point out that they lie in the part of prophecy usually known by his 
name. But if there is nothing in these citations to prove that Isaiah’s name is being used for any 
other purpose than that of reference, then it is plain-and this is all that we ask assent to at the 
present time-that they do not offer the authority of Scripture as a bar to our examining the 
evidence of the chapters in question. 
It is hardly necessary to add that neither is there any other question of doctrine in our way. 
There is none about the nature of prophecy, for, to take an example, chapter 53, as a prophecy of 
Jesus Christ, is surely as great a marvel if yon date it from the Exile as if you date it from the age 
of Isaiah. And, in particular, let us understand that no question need be started about the ability 
of God’s Spirit to inspire a prophet to mention Cyrus by name one hundred and fifty years before 
Cyrus appeared. The question is not, Could a prophet have been so inspired?-to which question, 
were it put, our answer might only be, God is great!-but the question is, Was our prophet so 
inspired? does he himself offer evidence of the fact? Or, on the contrary, in naming Cyrus does 
he give himself out as a contemporary of Cyrus, who already saw the great Persian above the 
horizon? To this question only the writings under discussion can give us an answer. Let us see 
what they have to say. 
Apart from the question of the date, no chapters in the Bible are interpreted with such complete 
unanimity as Isaiah 40-48. They plainly set forth certain things as having already taken place-
the Exile and Captivity, the ruin of Jerusalem, and the devastation of the Holy Land. Israel is 
addressed as having exhausted the time of her penalty, and is proclaimed to be ready for 
deliverance. Some of the people are comforted as being in despair because redemption does not 
draw near; others are exhorted to leave the city of their bondage, as if they were growing too 
familiar with its idolatrous life. Cyrus is named as their deliverer, and is pointed out as already 
called upon his career, and as blessed with success by Jehovah. It is also promised that he will 
immediately add Babylon to his conquests, and so set God’s people free. 
Now all this is not predicted, as if from the standpoint of a previous century. It is nowhere said-
as we should expect it to be said, if the prophecy had been uttered by Isaiah-that Assyria, the 
dominant world-power of Isaiah’s day, was to disappear and Babylon to take her place; that then 
the Babylonians should lead the Jews into an exile which they had escaped at the hands of 
Assyria; and that after nearly seventy years of suffering God would raise up Cyrus as a deliverer. 
There is none of this prediction, which we might fairly have expected had the prophecy been 
Isaiah’s; because, however far Isaiah carries us into the future, he never fails to start from the 
circumstances of his own day. Still more significant, however-there is not even the kind of 
prediction that we find in Jeremiah’s prophecies of the Exile, with which indeed it is most 
instructive to compare Isaiah 40-66 Jeremiah also spoke of exile and deliverance, but it was 
always with the grammar of the future. He fairly and openly predicted both; and, let us 
especially remember, he did so with a meagreness of description, a reserve and reticence about 
details, which are simply unintelligible if Isaiah 40-66 was written before his day, and by so 
well-known a prophet as Isaiah. 
No: in the statements which our chapters make concerning the Exile and the condition of Israel 
under it, there is no prediction, not the slightest trace of that grammar of the future in which 
Jeremiah’s prophecies are constantly uttered. But there is a direct appeal to the conscience of a 
people already long under the discipline of God; their circumstance of exile is taken for granted; 
there is a most vivid and delicate appreciation of their present fears and doubts, and to these the 
deliverer Cyrus is not only named, but introduced as an actual and notorious personage already 
upon the midway of his irresistible career. 

These facts are more broadly based than just at first sight appears. You cannot turn their flank 
by the argument that Hebrew prophets were in the habit of employing in their predictions what 
is called "the prophetic perfect"-that is, that in the ardour of their conviction that certain things 
would take place they talked of these, as the flexibility of the Hebrew tenses allowed them to do, 
in the past or perfect as if the things had actually taken place. No such argument is possible in 
the case of the introduction of Cyrus. For it is not only that the prophesy, with what might be the 
mere ardour of vision, represents the Persian as already above the horizon and upon the flowing 
tide of victory; but that, in the course of a sober argument for the unique divinity of the God of 
Israel, which takes place throughout chapters 41-48, Cyrus, alive and irresistible, already 
accredited by success, and with Babylonia at his feet, is pointed out as the unmistakable proof 
that former prophecies for a deliverance for Israel are at last coming to pass. Cyrus, in short, is 
not presented as a prediction, but as the proof that a prediction is being fulfilled. Unless he had 
already appeared in flesh and blood, and was on the point of striking at Babylon, with all the 
prestige of unbroken victory, a great part of Isa_41:1-29 - Isa_48:1-22 would be utterly 
unintelligible. 
This argument is so conclusive for the date of Second Isaiah, that it may be well to state it a little 
more in detail, even at the risk of anticipating some of the exposition of the text. 
Among the Jews at the close of the Exile there appear to have been two classes. One class was 
hopeless of deliverance, and to their hearts is addressed such a prophecy as chapter 40: 
"Comfort ye, comfort ye, My people." But there was another class, of opposite temperament, 
who had only too strong opinions on the subject of deliverance. In bondage to the letter of 
Scripture and to the great precedents of their history, these Jews appear to have insisted that the 
Deliverer to come must be a Jew, and a descendant of David. And the bent of much of the 
prophet’s urgency in chapter 45 is to persuade those pedants, that the Gentile Cyrus, who had 
appeared to be not only the biggest man of his age, but the very likely means of Israel’s 
redemption, was of Jehovah’s own creation and calling. Does not such an argument necessarily 
imply that Cyrus was already present, an object of doubt and debate to earnest minds in Israel? 
Or are we to suppose that all this doubt and debate were foreseen, rehearsed, and answered one 
hundred and fifty years before the time by so famous a prophet as Isaiah, and that, in spite of his 
prediction and answer, the doubt and debate nevertheless took place in the minds of the very 
Israelites, who were most earnest students of ancient prophecy? The thing has only to be stated 
to be felt to be impossible. 
But besides the pedants in Israel, there is apparent through these prophecies another body of 
men, against whom also Jehovah claims the actual Cyrus for His own. They are the priests and 
worshippers of the heathen idols. It is well known that the advent of Cyrus cast the Gentile 
religions of the time and their counsellors into confusion. The wisest priests were perplexed; the 
oracles of Greece and Asia Minor either were dumb when consulted about the Persian, or gave 
more than usually ambiguous answers. Over against this perplexity and despair of the heathen 
religions, our prophet confidently claims Cyrus for Jehovah’s own. In a debate in chapter 41, in 
which he seeks to establish Jehovah’s righteousness-that is, Jehovah’s faithfulness to His word, 
and power to carry out His predictions - the prophet speaks of ancient prophecies which have 
come from Jehovah, and points to Cyrus as their fulfilment. It does not matter to us in the 
meantime what those prophecies were. They may have been certain of Jeremiah’s predictions; 
we may be sure that they cannot have contained anything so definite as Cyrus’ name, or such a 
proof of Divine foresight must certainly have formed part of the prophet’s plea. It is enough that 
they could be quoted; our business is rather with the evidence which the prophet offers of their 
fulfilment. That evidence is Cyrus. Would it have been possible to refer the heathen to Cyrus as 
proof that those ancient prophecies were being fulfilled, unless Cyrus had been visible to the 
heathen, -unless the heathen had been beginning already to feel this Persian "from the sunrise" 
in all his weight of war? It is no esoteric doctrine which the prophet is unfolding to initiated 

Israelites about Cyrus. He is making an appeal to men of the world to face facts. Could he 
possibly have made such an appeal unless the facts had been there, unless Cyrus had been 
within the ken of "the natural man"? Unless Cyrus and his conquests were already historically 
present, the argument in 41-48 is unintelligible. 
If this evidence for the exilic date of Isaiah 40-48 -for all these chapters hang together-required 
any additional support, it would find it in the fact that the prophet does not wholly treat of what 
is past and over, but makes some predictions as well. Cyrus is on the way of triumph, but 
Babylon has still to fall by his hand. Babylon has still to fall, before the exiles can go free. Now, if 
our prophet were predicting from the standpoint of one hundred and forty years before, why did 
he make this sharp distinction between two events which appeared so closely together? If he had 
both the advent of Cyrus and the fall of Babylon in his long perspective, why did he not use "the 
prophetic perfect" for both? That he speaks of the first as past and of the second as still to come, 
would most surely, if there had been no tradition the other way, have been accepted by all as 
sufficient evidence, that the advent of Cyrus was behind him and the fall of Babylon still in front 
of him, when he wrote these chapters. 
Thus the earlier part, at least, of Isaiah 40-66 -that is, chapters 40-48- compels us to date it 
between 555, Cyrus’s advent, and 538, Babylon’s fall. But some think that we may still further 
narrow the limits. In Isa_41:25, Cyrus, whose own kingdom lay east of Babylonia, is described as 
invading Babylonia from the north. This, it has been thought, must refer to his union with the 
Medes in 549, and his threatened descent upon Mesopotamia from their quarter of the prophet’s 
horizon. If it be so, the possible years of our prophecy are reduced to eleven, 549-538. But even 
if we take the wider and more certain limit, 555 to 538, we may well say that there are very few 
chapters in the whole of the Old Testament whose date can be fixed so precisely as the date of 
chapters 40-48. 
If what has been unfolded in the preceding paragraphs is recognised as the statement of the 
chapters themselves, it will be felt that further evidence of an exilic date is scarcely needed. And 
those, who are acquainted with the controversy upon the evidence furnished by the style and 
language of the prophecies, will admit how far short in decisiveness it falls of the arguments 
offered above. But we may fairly ask whether there is anything opposed to the conclusion we 
have reached, either, first, in the local colour of the prophecies: or, second, in their language; or, 
third, in their thought - anything which shows that they are more likely to have been Isaiah’s 
than of exilic origin. 
1. It has often been urged against the exilic date of these prophecies, that they wear so very little 
local colour, and one of the greatest of critics, Ewald, has felt himself, therefore, permitted to 
place their home, not in Babylonia, but in Egypt, while he maintains the exilic date. But, as we 
shall see in surveying the condition of the exiles, it was natural for the best among them, their 
psalmists and prophets, to have no eyes for the colours of Babylon. They lived inwardly; they 
were much more the inhabitants of their own broken hearts than of that gorgeous foreign land; 
when their thoughts rose out of themselves it was to seek immediately the far-away Zion. How 
little local colour is there in the writings of Ezekiel! Isaiah 40-66 has even more to show; for 
indeed the absence of local colour from our prophecy has been greatly exaggerated. We shall 
find as we follow the exposition, break after break of Babylonian light and shadow falling across 
our path, -the temples, the idol-manufactories, the processions of images, the diviners and 
astrologers, the gods and altars especially cultivated by the characteristic mercantile spirit of the 
place; the shipping of that mart of nations, the crowds of her merchants; the glitter of many 
waters, and even that intolerable glare, which so frequently curses the skies of Mesopotamia. 
(Isa_49:10) The prophet speaks of the hills of his native land with just the same longing, that 
Ezekiel and a probable psalmist of the Exile (Psa_121:1-8) betray, -the homesickness of a 
highland-born man whose prison is on a flat, monotonous plain. The beasts he mentions have 

for the most part been recognised as familiar in Babylonia; and while the same cannot be said of 
the trees and plants he names, it has been observed that the passages, into which he brings 
them, are passages where his thoughts are fixed on the restoration to Palestine. Besides these, 
there are many delicate symptoms of the presence, before the prophet, of a people in a foreign 
land, engaged in commerce, but without political responsibilities, each of which, taken by itself, 
may be insufficient to convince, but the reiterated expression of which has even betrayed 
commentators, who lived too early for the theory of a second Isaiah, into the involuntary 
admission of an exilic authorship. It will perhaps startle some to hear John Calvin quoted on 
behalf of the exilic date of these prophecies. But let us read and consider this statement of his: 
"Some regard must be had to the time when this prophecy was uttered; for since the rank of the 
kingdom had been obliterated, and the name of the royal family had become mean and 
contemptible, during the captivity in Babylon, it might seem as if through the ruin of that family 
the truth of God had fallen into decay; and therefore he bids them contemplate by faith the 
throne of David, which had been cast down." 
2. What we have seen to be true of the local colour of our prophecy holds good also of its style 
and language. There is nothing in either of these to commit us to an Isaiah authorship, or to 
make an exilic date improbable; on the contrary, the language and style, while containing no 
stronger nor more frequent resemblances to the language and style of Isaiah than may be 
accounted for by the natural influence of so great a prophet upon his successors, are signalised 
by differences from his undisputed oracles, too constant, too subtle, and sometimes too sharp, to 
make it at all probable that the whole book came from the same man. On this point it is enough 
to refer our readers to the recent exhaustive and very able reviews of the evidence by Canon 
Cheyne in the second volume of his Commentary, and by Canon Driver in the last chapter of 
"Isaiah: His Life and Times," and to quote the following words of so great an authority as 
Professor A. B. Davidson. After remarking on the difference in vocabulary of the two parts of the 
Book of Isaiah, he adds that it is not so much words in themselves as the peculiar uses and 
combinations of them, and especially "the peculiar articulation of sentences and the movement 
of the whole discourse, by which an impression is produced so unlike the impression produced 
by the earlier parts of the book." 
3. It is the same with the thought and doctrine of our prophecy. In this there is nothing to make 
the Isaian authorship probable, or an exilic date impossible. But, on the contrary, whether we 
regard the needs of the people or the analogies of the development of their religion, we find that, 
while everything suits the Exile, nearly everything is foreign both to the subjects and to the 
methods of Isaiah. We shall observe the items of this as we go along, but one of them may be 
mentioned here (it will afterwards require a chapter to itself), our prophet’s use of the terms 
righteous and righteousness. No one, who has carefully studied the meaning which these terms 
bear in the authentic oracles of Isaiah, and the use to which they are put in the prophecies under 
discussion, can fail to find in the difference a striking corroboration of our argument-that the 
latter were composed by a different mind than Isaiah’s, speaking to a different generation. 
To sum up this whole argument. We have seen that there is no evidence in the Book of Isaiah to 
prove that it was all by himself, but much testimony which points to a plurality of authors; that 
chapters 40-66 nowhere assert themselves to be by Isaiah; and that there is no other well-
grounded claim of Scripture or doctrine on behalf of his authorship. We have then shown that 
chapters 40-48 do not only present the Exile as if nearly finished and Cyrus as if already come, 
while the fall of Babylon is still future; but that it is essential to one of their main arguments that 
Cyrus should be standing before Israel and the world, as a successful warrior, on his way to 
attack Babylon. That led us to date these chapters between 555 and 538. Turning then to other 
evidence, -the local colour they show, their language and style, and their theology, -we have 
found nothing which conflicts with that date, but, on the contrary, a very great deal, which much 
more agrees with it than with the date, or with the authorship, of Isaiah. 

It will be observed, however, that the question has been limited to the earlier chapters of the 
twenty-seven under discussion, viz., to 40-48 Does the same conclusion hold good of 49 to 66? 
This can be properly discovered only as we closely follow their exposition; it is enough in the 
meantime to have got firm footing on the Exile. We can feel our way bit by bit from this 
standpoint onwards. Let us now merely anticipate the main features of the rest of the prophecy. 
A new section has been marked by many as beginning with chapter 49. This is because chapter 
48, concludes with a refrain: "There is no peace, saith Jehovah, to the wicked," which occurs 
again at the end of chapter 57, and because with chapter 48. Babylon and Cyrus drop out of 
sight. But the circumstances are still those of exile, and, as Professor Davidson remarks, chapter 
49 is parallel in thought to chapter 42, and also takes for granted the restoration of Israel in 
chapter 48, proceeding naturally from that to the statement of Israel’s world-mission. Apart 
from the alternation of passages dealing with the Servant of the Lord, and passages whose 
subject is Zion - an alternation which begins pretty early in the prophecy, and has suggested to 
some its composition out of two different writings-the first real break in the sequence occurs at 
Isa_52:13, where the prophecy of the sin-bearing Servant is introduced. By most critics this is 
held to be an insertion, for Isa_54:1 follows naturally upon Isa_52:12, though it is undeniable 
that there is also some association between Isa_52:13 - Isa_53:1-12, and chapter 54. In chapters 
54-55, we are evidently still in exile. It is in commenting on a verse of these chapters that Calvin 
makes the admission of exilic origin which has been quoted above. 
A number of short prophecies now follow, till the end of chapter 59 is reached. These, as we shall 
see, make it extremely difficult to believe in the original unity of "Second Isaiah." Some of them, 
it is true, lie in evident circumstance of exile; but others are undoubtedly of earlier date, 
reflecting the scenery of Palestine, and the habits of the people in their political independence, 
with Jehovah’s judgment-cloud still unburst, but lowering. Such is Isa_56:9 - Isa_57:1-21, which 
regards the Exile as still to come, quotes the natural features of Palestine, and charges the Jews 
with unbelieving diplomacy-a charge not possible against them when they were in captivity. But 
others of these short prophecies are, in the opinion of some critics, post-exilic. Cheyne assigns 
chapter 56 to after the Return, when the temple was standing, and the duty of holding fasts and 
sabbaths could be enforced, as it was enforced by Nehemiah. I shall give, when we reach the 
passage, my reasons for doubting his conclusion. The chapter seems to me as likely to have been 
written upon the eve of the Return as after the Return had taken place. 
Chapter 57, the eighteenth of our twenty-seven chapters, closes with the same refrain as chapter 
48, the ninth of the series: "There is no peace, saith Jehovah, to the wicked." Chapter 58, has, 
therefore, been regarded, as beginning the third great division of the prophecy. But here again, 
while there is certainly an advance in the treatment of the subject, and the prophet talks less of 
the redemption of the Jews and more of the glory of the restoration of Zion, the point of 
transition is very difficult to mark. Some critics regard chapter 58, as post-exilic; but when we 
come to it we shall find a number of reasons for supposing it to belong, just as much as Ezekiel, 
to the Exile. Chapter 59 is perhaps the most difficult portion of all, because it makes the Jews 
responsible for civic justice in a way they could ‘hardly be conceived to be in exile, and yet 
speaks, in the language of other portions of "Second Isaiah," of a deliverance that cannot well be 
other than the deliverance from exile. We shall find in this chapter likely marks of the fusion of 
two distinct addresses, making the conclusion probable that it is Israel’s earlier conscience 
which we catch here, following her into the days of exile, and reciting her former guilt just before 
pardon is assured. Chapters 60, 61, and 62 are certainly exilic. The inimitable prophecy, 
Isa_63:1-6, complete within itself, and unique in its beauty, is either a promise given just before 
the deliverance from a long captivity of Israel under heathen nations (Isa_63:4), or an exultant 
song of triumph immediately after such a deliverance has taken place. Isa_63:7 - Isa_64:1-12 
implies a ruined temple (Isa_63:10), but bears no traces of the writer being in exile. It has been 
assigned to the period of the first attempts to rebuild Jerusalem after the Return. Chapter 65 has 

been assigned to the same date, and its local colour interpreted as that of Palestine. But we shall 
find the colour to be just as probably that of Babylon, and again I do not see any certain proofs 
of a post-exilic date. Chapter 66, however, betrays more evidence of being written after the 
Return. It divides into two parts. In Isa_66:1-4 the temple is still unbuilt, but the building would 
seem to be already begun. In Isa_66:5-24, the arrival of the Jews in Palestine, the resumption of 
the life of the sacred community, and the disappointments of the returned at the first meagre 
results, seem to be implied. And the music of the book dies out in tones of warning, that sin still 
hinders the Lord’s work with His people. 
This rapid survey has made two things sufficiently clear. First, that while the bulk of chapters 
40-66 was composed in Babylonia during the Exile of the Jews, there are considerable portions 
which date from before the Exile, and betray a Palestinian origin; and one or two smaller pieces 
that seem-rather less evidently, however-to take for granted the Return from the Exile. But, 
secondly, all these pieces, which it seems necessary to assign to different epochs and authors, 
have been arranged so as to exhibit a certain order and progress-an order, more or less 
observed, of date, and a progress very apparent (as we shall see in the course of exposition) of 
thought and of clearness in definition. The largest portion, of whose unity we are assured and 
whose date we can fix, is found at the beginning. Chapters 40-48 are certainly by one hand, and 
may be dated, as we have seen, between 555 and 538-the period of Cyrus’ approach to take 
Babylon. There the interest in Cyrus ceases, and the thought of the redemption from Babylon is 
mainly replaced by that of the subsequent Return. Along with these lines, we shall discover a 
development in the prophecy’s great doctrine of the Servant of Jehovah. But even this dies away, 
as if the experience of suffering and discipline were being replaced by that of return and 
restoration; and it is Zion in her glory, and the spiritual mission of the people, and the 
vengeance of the Lord, and the building of the temple, and a number of practical details in the 
life and worship of the restored community, which fill up the remainder of the book, along with 
a few echoes from pre-exilic times. Can we escape feeling in all this a definite design and 
arrangement, which fails to be absolutely perfect, probably, from the nature of the materials at 
the arranger’s disposal? 
We are, therefore, justified in coming to the provisional conclusion, that Second Isaiah is not a 
unity, in so far as it consists of a number of pieces by different men, whom God raised up at 
various times before, during, and after the Exile, to comfort and exhort amid the shifting 
circumstance and tempers of His people; but that it is a unity, in so far as these pieces have been 
gathered together by an editor very soon after the Return from the Exile, in an order as regular 
both in point of time and subject as the somewhat mixed material would permit. It is in this 
sense that throughout this volume we shall talk of "our prophet," or "the prophet"; up to chapter 
49, at least, we shall feel that the expression is literally true; after that it is rather an editorial 
than an original unity which is apparent. In this question of unity the dramatic style of the 
prophecy forms, no doubt, the greatest difficulty. Who shall dare to determine of the many 
soliloquies, apostrophes, lyrics, and other pieces that are here gathered, often in want of any 
connection save that of dramatic grouping and a certain sympathy of temper, whether they are 
by the same author or have been collected from several origins? We must be content to leave the 
matter uncertain. One great reason, which we have not yet quoted, for supposing that the whole 
prophecy is not by one man, is that if it had been his name would certainly have come down with 
it. Do not let it be thought that such a conclusion, as we have been led to, is merely a dogma of 
modern criticism. Here, if anywhere, the critic is but the patient student of Scripture, searching 
for the testimony of the sacred text about itself, and formulating that. If it be found that such a 
testimony conflicts with ecclesiastical tradition, however ancient and universal, so much the 
worse for tradition. In Protestant circles, at least, we have no choice. Litera Scripta manet. 
When we know that the only evidence for the Isaiah authorship of chapters 40-66 is tradition, 
supported by an unthinking interpretation of New Testament citations, while the whole 

testimony of these Scriptures themselves denies them to be Isaiah’s, we cannot help making our 
choice, and accepting the testimony of Scripture. Do we find them any the less wonderful or 
Divine? Do they comfort less? Do they speak with less power to conscience? Do they testify with 
more uncertain voice to our Lord and Saviour? It will be the task of the following pages to show 
that, interpreted in connection with the history out of which they themselves say that God’s 
Spirit drew them, these twenty-seven chapters become only more prophetic of Christ, and more 
comforting and instructive to men, than they were before. 
But the remarkable fact is that anciently tradition itself appears to have agreed with the results 
of modern scholarship. The original place of the Book of Isaiah in the Jewish canon seems to 
have been after both Jeremiah and Ezekiel, a fact which goes to prove that it did not reach 
completion till a later date than the works of these two prophets of the Exile. 
If now it be asked, Why should a series of prophecies written in the Exile be attached to the 
authentic works of Isaiah? that is a fair question, and one which the supporters of the exilic 
authorship have the duty laid upon them of endeavouring to answer. Fortunately they are not 
under the necessity of falling back, for want of other reasons, on the supposition that this 
attachment was due to the error of some scribe, or to the custom which ancient writers practised 
of filling up any part of a volume, that remained blank when one book is finished, with the 
writing of any other that would fit the place. The first of these reasons is too accidental, the 
second too artificial, in face of the undoubted sympathy which exists among all parts of the Book 
of Isaiah. Isaiah himself plainly prophesied of an exile longer than his own generation 
experienced, and prophesied of a return from it (chapter 11). We saw no reason to dispute his 
claims to the predictions about Babylon in chapters 21 and 39 Isaiah’s, too, more than any other 
prophet’s, were those great and final hopes of the Old Testament - the survival of Israel and the 
gathering of the Gentiles to the worship of Jehovah at Jerusalem. But it is for the express 
purpose of emphasising the immediate fulfilment of such ancient predictions, that Isaiah 40-66 
were published. Although our prophet has "new things to publish," his first business is to show 
that the "former things have come to pass," especially the Exile, the survival of a Remnant, the 
sending of a Deliverer, the doom of Babylon. What more natural than to attach to his utterances 
those prophecies, of which the events he pointed to were the vindication and fulfilment? The 
attachment was the more easy to arrange that the authentic prophecies had not passed from 
Isaiah’s hand in a fixed form. They do not bear those marks of their author’s own editing, which 
are borne by the prophecies both of Jeremiah and Ezekiel. It is impossible to be dogmatic on the 
point. But these facts-that our chapters are concerned, as no other Scriptures are, with the 
fulfilment of previous prophecies; that it is the prophecies of Isaiah which are the original and 
fullest prediction of the events they are busy with; and that the form, in which Isaiah’s 
prophecies are handed down, did not preclude additions of this kind to them-contribute very 
evident reasons why Isaiah 40-66, though written in the Exile, should be attached to Isaiah 1-39. 
Thus we present a theory of the exilic authorship of Isaiah 40-66 within itself complete and 
consistent, suited to all parts of the evidence, and not opposed by the authority of any part of 
Scripture. In consequence of its conclusion, our duty, before proceeding to the exposition of the 
chapters, is twofold: first, to connect the time of Isaiah with the period of the Captivity, and then 
to sketch the condition of Israel in Exile. This we shall undertake in the next three chapters. 
NOTE TO CHAPTER I 
Readers may wish to have a reference to other passages of this part, in which the questions of 
the date, authorship and structure of Isaiah 40-66, are discussed. See: Introduction to Book III; 
opening paragraphs of chapter 18, and of chapter 19, etc.
 
FROM ISAIAH TO THE FALL OF JERUSALEM  

701-587 B.C. 
AT first sight, the circumstances of Judah in the last ten years of the seventh century present a 
strong resemblance to her fortunes in the last ten years of the eighth. The empire of the world, to 
which she belongs, is again divided between Egypt and a Mesopotamian power. Syria is again 
the field of their doubtful battle, and the question, to which of the two shall homage be paid, still 
forms the politics of all her states. Judah still vacillates, intrigues, and draws down on herself 
the wrath of the North by her treaties with Egypt. Again there is a great prophet and statesman, 
whose concern is righteousness, who exposes both the immorality of his people and the folly of 
their policies, and who summons the "evil from the North" as God’s scourge upon Israel: Isaiah 
has been succeeded by Jeremiah. And, as if to complete the analogy, the nation has once more 
passed through a puritan reformation. Josiah has, even more thoroughly than Hezekiah, 
effected the disestablishment of idols. 
Beneath this circumstantial resemblance, however, there is one fundamental difference. The 
strength of Isaiah’s preaching was bent, especially during the closing years of the century, to 
establish the inviolableness of Jerusalem. Against the threats of the Assyrian siege, and in spite 
of his own more formidable conscience of his people’s corruption, Isaiah persisted that Zion 
should not be taken, and that the people, though cut down to their roots, should remain planted 
in the land, -the stock of an imperial nation in the latter days. This prophecy was vindicated by 
the marvellous relief of Jerusalem on the apparent eve of her capture in 701. But its echoes had 
not yet died away, when Jeremiah to his generation delivered the very opposite message. Round 
him the popular prophets babbled by rote Isaiah’s ancient assurances about Zion. Their soft, 
monotonous repetitions lapped pleasantly upon the immovable self-confidence of the people. 
But Jeremiah called down the storm. Even while prosperity seemed to give him the lie, he 
predicted the speedy ruin of Temple and City, and summoned Judah’s enemies against her in 
the name of the God on whose former word she relied for peace. The contrast between the two 
great prophets grows most dramatic in their conduct during the respective sieges, of which each 
was the central figure. Isaiah, alone steadfast in a city of despair, defying the taunts of the 
heathen, rekindling within the dispirited defenders, whom the enemy sought to bribe to 
desertion, the passions of patriotism and religion, proclaiming always, as with the voice of a 
trumpet, that Zion must stand inviolate; Jeremiah, on the contrary, declaring the futility of 
resistance, counselling each citizen to save his own life from the ruin of the state, in treaty with 
the enemy, and even arrested as a deserter, -these two contrasting figures and attitudes gather 
up the difference which the century had wrought in the fortunes of the City of God. And so, 
while in 701 Jerusalem triumphed in the Lord by the sudden raising of the Assyrian siege, three 
years after the next century was out she twice succumbed to the Assyrian’s successor, and nine 
years later was totally destroyed. 
What is the reason of this difference which a century sufficed to work? Why was the sacredness 
of Judah’s shrine not as much an article of Jeremiah’s as of Isaiah’s creed, -as much an element 
of Divine providence in 600 as in 700 B.C.? This is not a very hard question to answer, if we 
keep in our regard two things, -firstly, the moral condition of the people, and, secondly, the 
necessities of the spiritual religion, which was identified for the time with their fortunes. 
The Israel which was delivered into captivity at the word of Jeremiah was a people at once more 
hardened and more exhausted than the Israel, which, in spite of its sin, Isaiah’s efforts had 
succeeded in preserving upon its own land. A century had come and gone of further grace and 
opportunity, but the grace had been resisted, the opportunity abused, and the people stood more 
guilty and more wilful than ever before God. Even clearer, however, than the deserts of the 
people was the need of their religion. That local and temporary victory-after all, only the relief of 
a mountain fortress and a tribal shrine-with which Isaiah had identified the will and honour of 
Almighty God, could not be the climax of the history of a spiritual religion. It was impossible for 

monotheism to rest on so narrow and material a security as that. The faith, which was to 
overcome the world, could not be satisfied with a merely national triumph. This time must 
arrive-were it only by the ordinary progress of the years and unhastened by human guilt-for 
faith and piety to be weaned from the forms of an earthly temple, however sacred: for the 
individual-after all, the real unit of religion-to be rendered independent of the community and 
cast upon his God alone; and for this people, to whom the oracles of the living God had been 
entrusted, to be led out from the selfish pride of guarding these for their own honour-to be led 
out, were it through the breaches of their hitherto inviolate walls, and amid the smoke of all that 
was most sacred to them, so that in level contact with mankind they might learn to communicate 
their glorious trust. Therefore, while the Exile was undoubtedly the penance, which an often-
spared but ever more obdurate people had to pay for their accumulated sins, it was also for the 
meek and the pure-hearted in Israel a step upwards even from the faith and the results of Isaiah-
perhaps the most effectual step which Israel’s religion ever took. Schultz has finely said: "The 
proper tragedy of history-doom required by long-gathering guilt, and launched upon a 
generation which for itself is really turning towards good-is most strikingly consummated in the 
Exile." Yes: but this is only half the truth. The accomplishment of the moral tragedy is really but 
one incident in a religious epic-the development of a spiritual faith. Long-delaying Nemesis 
overtakes at last the sinners, but the shock of the blows, which beat the guilty nation into 
captivity, releases their religion from its material bonds. Israel on the way to Exile is on the way 
to become Israel after the Spirit. 
With these principles to guide us, let us now, for a little, thread our way through the crowded 
details of the decline and fall of the Jewish state. 
Isaiah’s own age had foreboded the necessity of exile for Judah. There was the great precedent of 
Samaria, and Judah’s sin was not less than her sister’s. When the authorities at Jerusalem 
wished to put Jeremiah to death for the heresy of predicting the ruin of the sacred city, it was 
pointed out in his defence that a similar prediction had been made by Micah, the contemporary 
of Isaiah. And how much had happened since then! The triumph of Jehovah in 701, the stronger 
faith and purer practice, which had followed as long as Hezekiah reigned, gave way to an 
idolatrous reaction under his successor Manasseh. This reaction, while it increased the guilt of 
the people, by no means diminished their religious fear. They carried into it the conscience of 
their former puritanism-diseased, we might say delirious, but not dead. Men felt their sin and 
feared Heaven’s wrath, and rushed headlong into the gross and fanatic exercises of idolatry, in 
order to wipe away the one and avert the other. It availed nothing. After an absence of thirty 
years the Assyrian arms returned in full strength, and Manasseh himself was carried captive 
across the Euphrates. But penitence revived, and for a time it appeared as if it were to be at last 
valid for salvation. Israel made huge strides towards their ideal life of a good conscience and 
outward prosperity. Josiah, the pious, came to the throne. The Book of the Law was discovered 
in 621, and king and people rallied to its summons with the utmost loyalty. All the nation "stood 
to the covenant." The single sanctuary was vindicated, the high places destroyed, the land 
purged of idols. There were no great military triumphs but Assyria, so long the accepted scourge 
of God, gave signs of breaking up; and we can feel the vigour and self-confidence, induced by 
years of prosperity, in Josiah’s ambition to extend his borders, and especially in his daring 
assault upon Necho of Egypt at Megiddo, when Necho passed north to the invasion of Assyria. 
Altogether, it was a people that imagined itself righteous, and counted upon a righteous God. In 
such days who could dream of exile? 
But in 608 the ideal was shivered. Israel was threshed at Megiddo, and Josiah, the king after 
God’s own heart, was slain on the field. And then happened what happened at other times in 
Israel’s history when disillusion of this kind came down. The nation fell asunder into the 
elements of which it was ever so strange a composition. The masses, whose conscience did not 
rise beyond the mere performance of the Law, nor their view of God higher than that of a patron 

of the state, bound by His covenant to reward with material success the loyalty of His clients, 
were disappointed with the results of their service and of His providence. Being a new 
generation from Manasseh’s time, they thought to give the strange gods another turn. The idols 
were brought back, and after the discredit which righteousness received at Megiddo, it would 
appear that social injustice and crime of many kinds dared to be very bold. Jehoahaz, who 
reigned for three months after Josiah, and Jehoiakim, who succeeded him, were idolaters, The 
loftier few, like Jeremiah, had never been deceived by the people’s outward allegiance to the 
Temple or the Law, nor considered it valid either to atone for the past or now to fulfil the holy 
demands of Jehovah; and were confirmed by the disaster at Megiddo, and the consequent 
reaction to idolatry, in the stern and hopeless views of the people which they had always 
entertained. They kept reiterating a speedy captivity. Between these parties stood the formal 
successors of earlier prophets, so much the slaves of tradition that they had neither conscience 
for their people’s sins nor understanding of the world around them, but could only affirm in the 
strength of ancient oracles that Zion should not be destroyed. Strange is it to see how this party, 
building upon the promises of Jehovah through a prophet like Isaiah, should be taken advantage 
of by the idolaters, but scouted by Jehovah’s own servants. Thus they mingle and conflict. Who 
indeed can distinguish all the elements of so ancient and so rich a life, as they chase, overtake, 
and wrestle with each other, hurrying down the rapids to the final cataract? Let us leave them 
for a moment, while we mark the catastrophe itself. They will be more easily distinguished in the 
calm below. 
It was from the North that Jeremiah summoned the vengeance of God upon Judah. In his earlier 
threats he might have meant the Scythians; but by 605, when Nebuchadrezzar, Nabopolassar of 
Babylon’s son, the rising general of the age, defeated Pharaoh at Carchemish, all men accepted 
Jeremiah’s nomination for this successor of Assyria in the lordship of Western Asia. From 
Carchemish Nebuchadrezzar overran Syria. Jehoiakim paid tribute to him, and Judah at last felt 
the grip of the hand that was to drag her into exile. Jehoiakim attempted to throw it off in 602; 
but, after harassing him for four years by means of some allies, Nebuchadrezzar took his capital, 
executed him, suffered Jehoiachin, his successor, to reign only three months, took Jerusalem a 
second time, and carried off to Babylon the first great portion of the people. This was in 598, 
only ten years from the death of Josiah, and twenty-one from the discovery of the Book of the 
Law. 
The exact numbers of this first captivity of the Jews it is impossible to determine. The annalist 
sets the soldiers at seven thousand, the smiths and craftsmen at one thousand; so that, making 
allowance for other classes whom he mentions, the grown men must alone have been over ten 
thousand; but how many women went, and how many children-the most important factor for 
the period of the Exile with which we have to deal-it is impossible to estimate. The total number 
of persons can scarcely have been less than twenty-five thousand. More important, however, 
than their number was the quality of these exiles, and this we can easily appreciate. The royal 
family and the court were taken, a large number of influential persons, "the mighty men of the 
land," or what must have been nearly all the fighting men, with the necessary artificers; priests 
also went, Ezekiel among them, and probably representatives of other classes not mentioned by 
the annalist. That this was the virtue and flower of the nation is proved by a double witness. Not 
only did the citizens, for the remaining ten years of Jerusalem’s life, look to these exiles for her 
deliverance, but Jeremiah himself counted them the sound half of Israel-"a basket of good figs," 
as he expressed it, beside "a basket of bad ones." They were at least under discipline, but the 
remnant of Jerusalem persisted in the wilfulness of the past. 
For although Jeremiah remained in the city, and the house of David and a considerable 
population, and although Jeremiah himself held a higher position in public esteem since the 
vindication of his word by the events of 598, yet he could not be blind to the unchanged 
character of the people, and the thorough doom which their last respite had only more evidently 

proved to be inevitable. Gangs of false prophets, both at home and among the exiles, might 
predict a speedy return. All the Jewish ability of intrigue, with the lavish promises of Egypt and 
frequent embassies from other nations, might work for the overthrow of Babylon. But Jeremiah 
and Ezekiel knew better. Across the distance which now separated them they chanted, as it were 
in antiphon, the alternate strophes of Judah’s dirge. Jeremiah bade the exiles not to remember 
Zion, but "let them settle down," he said, "into the life of the land they are in, building houses, 
planting gardens, and begetting children, and ‘seek the peace of the city whither I have caused 
you to be carried away captives, and pray unto Jehovah for it, for in the peace thereof ye shall 
have peace’-the Exile shall last seventy years." And as Jeremiah in Zion blessed Babylon, so 
Ezekiel in Babylon cursed Zion, thundering back that Jerusalem must be utterly wasted through 
siege and famine, pestilence and captivity. There is no rush of hope through Ezekiel. His 
expectations are all distant. He lives either in memory or in cold fancy. His pictures of 
restoration are too elaborate to mean speedy fulfilment. They are the work of a man with time 
on his hands; one does not build so colossally for tomorrow. Thus reinforced from abroad, 
Jeremiah proclaimed Nebuchadrezzar as "the servant of Jehovah," and summoned him to work 
Jehovah’s doom upon the city. The predicted blockade came in the ninth year of Zedekiah. The 
false hopes which still sustained the people, their trust in Egypt, the arrival of an Egyptian army 
in result of their intrigue, as well as all their piteous bravery, only afforded time for the 
fulfilment of the terrible details of their penalty. For nearly eighteen months the siege closed in-
months of famine and pestilence, of faction and quarrel and falling away to the enemy. Then 
Jerusalem broke up. The besiegers gained the northern suburb and stormed the middle gate. 
Zedekiah and the army burst their lines only to be captured on an aimless flight at Jericho. A few 
weeks more, and a forlorn defence by civilians of the interior parts of the city was at last 
overwhelmed. The exasperated besiegers gave her up to fire-"the house of Jehovah, the king’s 
house, and every great house"-and tore to the stones the stout walls that resisted the 
conflagration. As the city was levelled, so the citizens were dispersed. A great number-and 
among them the king’s family-were put to death. The king himself was blinded, and, along with 
a host of his subjects, impossible for us to estimate, and with all the temple furniture, was 
carried to Babylon. A few peasants were left to cultivate the land; a few superior personages-
perhaps such as, with Jeremiah, had favoured the Babylonians, and Jeremiah was among them-
were left at Mizpah under a Jewish viceroy. It was a poor apparition of a state; but, as if the very 
ghost of Israel must be chased from the land, even this small community was broken up, and 
almost every one of its members fled to Egypt. The Exile was complete. 
WHAT ISRAEL TOOK INTO EXILE  
BEFORE we follow the captives along the roads that lead to exile, we may take account of the 
spiritual goods which they carried with them, and were to realise in their retirement. Never in all 
history did paupers of this world go forth more richly laden with the treasures of heaven. 
1. First of all, we must emphasise and define their monotheism. We must emphasise it as against 
those who would fain persuade us that Israel’s monotheism was for the most part the product of 
the Exile; we must analyse its contents and define its limits among the people, if we would 
appreciate the extent to which it spread and the peculiar temper which it assumed, as set forth 
in the prophecy we are about to study. 
Idolatry was by no means dead in Israel at the fall of Jerusalem. On the contrary, during the last 
years which the nation spent within those sacred walls, that had been so miraculously preserved 
in the sight of the world by Jehovah, idolatry increased, and to the end remained as determined 
and fanatic as the people’s defence of Jehovah’s own temple. The Jews who fled to Egypt applied 
themselves to the worship of the Queen of Heaven, in spite of all the remonstrances of Jeremiah; 
and him they carried with them, not because they listened to him as the prophet of the One True 
God, but superstitiously, as if he were a pledge of the favour of one of the many gods, whom they 

were anxious to propitiate. And the earliest effort, upon which we shall have to follow our own 
prophet, is the effort to crush the worship of images among the Babylonian exiles. Yet when 
Israel returned from Babylon the people were wholly monotheist; when Jerusalem was rebuilt 
no idol came back to her. 
That this great change was mainly the result of the residence in Babylon and of truths learned 
there, must be denied by all who remember the creed and doctrine about God, which in their 
literature the people carried with them into exile. The law was already written, and the whole 
nation had sworn to it: "Hear, O Israel, Jehovah our God; Jehovah is One, and thou shalt 
worship Jehovah thy God with all thine heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy strength." 
These words, it is true, may be so strictly interpreted as to mean no more than that there was 
one God for Israel: other gods might exist, but Jehovah was Sole Deity for His people. It is 
maintained that such a view receives some support from the custom of prophets, who, while 
they affirmed Jehovah’s supremacy, talked of other gods as if they were real existences. But 
argument from this habit of the prophets is precarious: such a mode of speech may have been a 
mere accommodation to a popular point of view. And, surely, we have only to recall what Isaiah 
and Jeremiah had uttered concerning Jehovah’s Godhead, to be persuaded that Israel’s 
monotheism, before the beginning of the Exile, was a far more broad and spiritual faith than the 
mere belief that Jehovah was the Sovereign Deity of the nation, or the satisfaction of the desires 
of Jewish hearts alone. Righteousness was not coincident with Israel’s life and interest; 
righteousness was universally supreme, and it was in righteousness that Isaiah saw Jehovah 
exalted. There is no more prevailing witness to the unity of God than the conscience, which in 
this matter takes far precedence of the intellect; and it was on the testimony of conscience that 
the prophets based Israel’s monotheism. Yet they did not omit to enlist the reason as well. Isaiah 
and Jeremiah delight to draw deductions from the reasonableness of Jehovah’s working in 
nature to the reasonableness of His processes in history, -analogies which could not fail to 
impress both intellect and imagination with the fact that men inhabit a universe, that One is the 
will and mind which works in all things. But to this training of conscience and reason, the Jews, 
at the beginning of the Exile, felt the addition of another considerable influence. Their history 
lay at last complete, and their conscience was at leisure from the making of its details to survey it 
as a whole. That long past, seen now by undazzled eyes from under the shadow of exile, 
presented through all its changing fortunes a single and definite course. One was the intention 
of it, one its judgment from first to last. The Jew saw in it nothing but righteousness, the quality 
of a God, who spake the same word from the beginning, who never broke His word, and who at 
last had summoned to its fulfilment the greatest of the world-powers. In those historical books, 
which were collected and edited during the Exile, we observe each of the kings and generations 
of Israel, in their turn, confronted with the same high standard of fidelity to the One True God 
and His holy Law. The regularity and rigour, with which they are thus judged, have been 
condemned by some critics as an arbitrary and unfair application of the standard of a later faith 
to the conduct of ruder and less responsible ages. But, apart from the question of historical 
accuracy, we cannot fail to remark that this method of writing history is at least instinct with the 
Oneness of God, and the unvarying validity of His Law from generation to generation. Israel’s 
God was the same, their conscience told them, down all their history; but now as He summoned 
one after another of the great world-powers to do His bidding, -Assyria, Babylon, Persia, -how 
universal did He prove His dominion to be! Unchanging through all time, He was surely 
omnipotent through all space. 
This short review-in which, for the sake of getting a complete view of our subject, we have 
anticipated a little-has shown that Israel had enough within themselves, in the teaching of their 
prophets and in the lessons of their own history, to account for that consummate expression of 
Jehovah’s Godhead, which is contained in our prophet, and to which every one allows the 
character of an absolute monotheism. We shall find this, it is true, to be higher and more 

comprehensive than anything which is said about God in pre-exilic Scriptures. The prophet 
argues the claims of Jehovah, not only with the ardour that is born of faith, but often with the 
scorn which indicates the intellect at work. It is monotheism, treated not only as a practical 
belief or a religious duty, but as a necessary truth of reason; not only as the secret of faith and 
the special experience of Israel, but also as an essential conviction of human nature, so that not 
to believe in One God is a thing irrational and absurd for Gentiles as well as Jews. God’s 
infinitude in the works of creation, His universal providence in history, are preached with 
greater power than ever before; and the gods of the nations are treated as things, in whose 
existence no reasonable person can possibly believe. In short, our great prophet of the Exile has 
already learned to obey the law of Deuteronomy as it was expounded by Christ. Deuteronomy 
says, "Thou shalt love Jehovah thy God with all thine heart, with all thy soul, and with all thy 
strength." Christ added, "and with all thy mind." This was what our prophet did. He held his 
monotheism" with all his mind." We shall find him conscious of it, not only as a religious 
affection, but as a necessary intellectual conviction; which if a man has not, he is less than a 
man. Hence the scorn which he pours upon the idols and mythologies of his conquerors. Beside 
his tyrants, though in physical strength he was but a worm to them, the Jew felt that he walked, 
by virtue of his faith in One God, their intellectual master. 
We shall see all this illustrated later on. Meantime, what we are concerned to show is that there 
is enough to account for this high faith within Israel themselves-in their prophecy and in the 
lessons of their history. And where indeed are we to be expected to go in search of the sources of 
Israel’s monotheism, if not to themselves? To the Babylonians? The Babylonians had nothing 
spiritual to teach to Israel; our prophet regards them with scorn. To the Persians, who broke 
across Israel’s horizon with Cyrus? Our prophet’s high statement of monotheism is of earlier 
date than the advent of Cyrus to Babylon. Nor did Cyrus, when he came, give any help to the 
faith, for in his public edicts he owned the gods of Babylon and the God of Israel with equal care 
and equal policy. It was not because Cyrus and his Persians were monotheists, that our prophet 
saw the sovereignty of Jehovah vindicated, but it was because Jehovah was sovereign that the 
prophet knew the Persians would serve His holy purposes. 
2. But if in Deuteronomy the exiles carried with them the Law of the One God, they preserved in 
Jeremiah’s writings what may be called the charter of the individual man. Jeremiah had found 
religion in Judah a public and a national affair. The individual derived his spiritual value only 
from being a member of the nation, and through the public exercises of the national faith. But, 
partly by his own religious experience, and partly by the course of events, Jeremiah was enabled 
to accomplish what may be justly described as the vindication of the individual. Of his own 
separate value before God, and of his right of access to his Maker apart from the nation, 
Jeremiah himself was conscious, having belonged to God before he belonged to his mother, his 
family, or his nation. "Before I found thee in the belly I knew thee, and before thou camest out of 
the womb I consecrated thee." His whole life was but the lesson of how one man can be for God 
and all the nation on the other side. And it was in the strength of this solitary experience, that he 
insisted, in his famous thirty-first chapter, on the individual responsibility of man and on every 
man’s immediate communication with God’s Spirit; and that, when the ruin of the state was 
imminent, he advised each of his friends to "take his own life" out of it "for a prey." (Jeremiah 
65) But Jeremiah’s doctrine of the religious value and independence of the individual had a 
complement. Though the prophet felt so keenly his separate responsibility and right of access to 
God, and his religious independence of the people, he nevertheless clave to the people with all 
his heart. He was not, like some other prophets, outside the doom he preached. He might have 
saved himself, for he had many offers from the Babylonians. But he chose to suffer with his 
people-he, the saint of God, with the idolaters. More than that, it may be said that Jeremiah 
suffered for the people. It was not they, with their dead conscience and careless mind, but he, 
with his tender conscience and breaking heart, who bore the reproach of their sins, the anger of 

the Lord, and all the agonising knowledge of his country’s inevitable doom. In Jeremiah one 
man did suffer for the people. 
In our prophecy, which is absorbed with the deliverance of the nation as a whole, there was, of 
course, no occasion to develop Jeremiah’s remarkable suggestions about each individual soul of 
man. In fact, these suggestions were germs, which remained uncultivated in Israel till Christ’s 
time. Jeremiah himself uttered them, not as demands for the moment, but as ideals that would 
only be realised when the New Covenant was made. Our prophecy has nothing to say about 
them. But that figure, which Jeremiah’s life presented, of One Individual-of One Individual 
standing in moral solitude over against the whole nation, and in a sense suffering for the nation, 
can hardly have been absent from the influences, which moulded the marvellous confession of 
the people in the fifty-third chapter of Isaiah, where they see the solitary servant of God on one 
side and themselves on the other, "and Jehovah made to light on him the iniquities of us all." It 
is true that the exiles themselves had some consciousness of suffering for others. "Our fathers," 
cried a voice in their midst, when Jerusalem broke up, "Our fathers have sinned, and we have 
borne their iniquities." But Jeremiah had been a willing sufferer for his people; and the fifty-
third chapter is, as we shall see, more like his way of bearing his generation’s guilt for love’s sake 
than their way of bearing their father’s guilt in the inevitable entail of sin. 
3. To these beliefs in the unity of God, the religious worth of the individual, and the virtue of his 
self-sacrifice, we must add some experiences of scarcely less value rising out of the destruction 
of the material and political forms-the temple, the city, the monarchy-with which the faith of 
Israel had been so long identified. 
Without this destruction, it is safe to say, those beliefs could not have assumed their purest 
form. Take, for instance, the belief in the unity of God. There is no doubt that this belief was 
immensely helped in Israel by the abolition of all the provincial sanctuaries under Josiah, by the 
limitation of Divine worship to one temple and of valid sacrifice to one altar. But yet it was well 
that this temple should enjoy its singular rights for only thirty years and then be destroyed. For 
a monotheism, however lofty, which depended upon the existence of any shrine, however 
gloriously vindicated by Divine providence, was not a purely spiritual faith. Or, again, take the 
individual. The individual could not realise how truly he himself was the highest temple of God, 
and God’s most pleasing sacrifice a broken and a contrite heart, till the routine of legal sacrifice 
was interrupted and the ancient altar torn down. Or, once more, take that high, ultimate 
doctrine of sacrifice, that the most inspiring thing for men, the most effectual propitiation before 
God, is the self-devotion and offering up of a free and reasonable soul, the righteous for the 
unrighteous-how could common Jews have adequately learned that truth, in days when, 
according to immemorial practice, the bodies of bulls and goats bled daily on the one valid altar? 
The city and temple, therefore, went up in flames that Israel might learn that God is a Spirit, and 
dwelleth not in a house made with hands; that men are His temple, and their hearts the 
sacrifices well-pleasing in His sight; and that beyond the bodies and blood of beasts, with their 
daily necessity of being offered, He was preparing for them another Sacrifice, of perpetual and 
universal power, in the voluntary sufferings of His own holy Servant. It was for this Servant, too, 
that the monarchy, as it were, abdicated, yielding up to Him all its title to represent Jehovah and 
to save and rule Jehovah’s people. 
4. Again, as we have already hinted, the fall of the state and city of Jerusalem gave scope to 
Israel’s missionary career. The conviction, that that had inspired many of Isaiah’s assertions of 
the inviolableness of Zion, was the conviction that, if Zion were overthrown and the last remnant 
of Israel uprooted from the land, there must necessarily follow the extinction of the only true 
testimony to the living God which the world contained. But by a century later that testimony was 
firmly secured in the hearts and consciences of the people, wheresoever they might be scattered; 
and what was now needed was exactly such a dispersion, -in order that Israel might become 

aware of the world for whom the testimony was meant, and grow expert in the methods by 
which it was to be proclaimed. Priesthood has its human as well as its Godward side. The latter 
was already sufficiently secured for Israel by Jehovah’s age-long seclusion of them in their 
remote highlands-a people peculiar to Himself. But now the same Providence completed its 
purpose by casting them upon the world. They mixed with men face to face, or, still more 
valuably to themselves, on a level with the most downtrodden and despised of the peoples. With 
no advantage but the truth, they met the other religions of the world in argument, debating with 
them upon the principles of a common reason and the facts of a common history. They learned 
sympathy with the weak things of earth. They discovered that their religion could be taught. But, 
above all, they became conscious of martyrdom, the indispensable experience of a religion that 
is to prevail; and they realised the supreme influence upon men of a love which sacrifices itself. 
In a word, Israel, in going into exile, put on humanity with all its consequences. How real and 
thorough the process was, how successful in perfecting their priesthood, may be seen not only 
from the hopes and obligations towards all mankind, which burst in our prophecy to an urgency 
and splendour unmatched elsewhere in their history, but still more from the fact that when the 
Son of God Himself took flesh and became man, there were no words oftener upon His lips to 
describe His experience and commission, there are no passages which more clearly mirror His 
work for the world, than the words and the passages in which these Jews of the Exile, stripped to 
their bare humanity, relate their sufferings or exult in their destiny that should follow. 
5. But with their temple in ruins, and all the world before them for the service of God, the Jews 
go forth to exile upon the distinct promise of return. The material form of their religion is 
suspended, not abolished. Let them feel religion in purely spiritual aspects, unassisted by 
sanctuary or ritual; let them look upon the world and the oneness of men; let them learn all 
God’s scope for the truth He has entrusted to them, -and then let them gather back again and 
cherish their new experience and ideas for yet awhile in the old seclusion. Jehovah’s discipline of 
them as a nation is not yet exhausted. They are no mere band of pilgrims or missionaries, with 
the world for their home; they are still a people. with their own bit of the earth. If we keep this in 
mind, it will explain certain apparent anomalies in our prophecy. In all the writings of the Exile 
the reader is confused by a strange mingling of the spiritual and the material, the universal and 
the local. The moral restoration of the people to pardon and righteousness is identified with 
their political restoration to Judah and Jerusalem. They have been separated from ritual in 
order to cultivate a more spiritual religion, but it is to this that a restoration to ritual is promised 
for a reward. While Jeremiah insists upon the free and immediate communication of every 
believer with Jehovah, Ezekiel builds a more exclusive priesthood, a more elaborate system of 
worship. Within our prophecy, while one voice deprecates a house for God built with hands, 
affirming that Jehovah dwells with every one who is of a poor and contrite spirit, other voices 
dwell fondly on the prospect of the new temple and exult in its material glory. This double line of 
feeling is not merely due to the presence in Israel of those two opposite tempers of mind, which 
so naturally appear in every national literature. But a special purpose of God is in it. Dispersed 
to obtain more spiritual ideas of God and man and the world, Israel must be gathered back again 
to get these by heart, to enshrine them in literature, and to transmit them to posterity, as they 
could alone be securely transmitted, in the memories of a nation, in the liturgies and canons of a 
living Church. 
Therefore the Jews, though torn for their discipline from Jerusalem, continued to identify 
themselves more passionately than ever with their desecrated city. A prayer of the period 
exclaims: "Thy saints take pleasure in her stones, and her dust is dear to them." (Psa_102:14) 
The exiles proved this by taking her name. Their prophets addressed them as "Zion" and 
"Jerusalem." Scattered and leaderless groups of captives in a far-off land, they were still that 
City of God. She had not ceased to be; ruined and forsaken as she lay, she was yet "graven on the 
palms of Jehovah’s hands; and her walls were continually before Him." (Isa_49:15) The exiles 

kept up the register of her families; they prayed towards her; they looked to return to build her 
bulwarks; they spent long hours of their captivity in tracing upon the dust of that foreign land 
the ground plan of her restored temple. 
With such beliefs in God and man and sacrifice, with such hopes and opportunities for their 
world-mission, but also with such a bias back to the material Jerusalem, did Israel pass into 
exile. 
ISRAEL IN EXILE 
FROM 589 TILL ABOUT 550 B.C.  
IT is remarkable how completely the sound of the march from Jerusalem to Babylon has died 
out of Jewish history. It was an enormous movement: twice over within ten years, ten thousand 
Jews, at the very least, must have trodden the highway to the Euphrates; and yet, except for a 
doubtful verse or two in the Psalter, they have left no echo of their passage. The sufferings of the 
siege before, the remorse and lamentation of the Exile after, still pierce our ears through the 
Book of Lamentations and the Psalms by the rivers of Babylon. We know exactly how the end 
was fulfilled. We see most vividly the shifting panorama of the siege, -the city in famine, under 
the assault, and in smoke; upon the streets the pining children, the stricken princes, the groups 
of men with sullen, famine-black faces, the heaps of slain, mothers feeding on the bodies of the 
infants whom their sapless breasts could not keep alive; by the walls the hanging and crucifixion 
of multitudes, with all the fashion of Chaldean cruelty, the delicate and the children stumbling 
under heavy loads, no survivor free from the pollution of blood. Upon the hills around, the 
neighbouring tribes are gathered to jeer at "the day of Jerusalem," and to cut off her fugitives; 
we even see the departing captives turn, as the worm turns, to curse "those children of Edom." 
But there the vision closes. Was it this hot hate which blinded them to the sights of the way, or 
that weariness and depression among strange scenes, that falls upon all unaccustomed caravans, 
and has stifled the memory of nearly every other great historical march? The roads which the 
exiles traversed were of immemorial use in the history of their fathers; almost every day they 
must have passed names which, for at least two centuries, had rung in the market-place of 
Jerusalem-the Way of the Sea, across Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles, round Hermon, and past 
Damascus; between the two Lebanons, past Hamath, and past Arpad; or less probably by 
Tadmor-in-the-Wilderness and Rezeph, -till they reached the river on which the national 
ambition had lighted as the frontier of the Messianic Empire, and whose rolling greatness had so 
often proved the fascination and despair of a people of uncertain brooks and trickling aqueducts. 
Crossing the Euphrates by one of its numerous passages-either at Carchemish, if they struck the 
river so high, or at the more usual Thapsacus, Tiphsah, "the passage," where Xenophon crossed 
with his Greeks, or at some other place-the caravans must have turned south across the Habor, 
on whose upper banks the captives of Northern Israel had been scattered, and then have 
traversed the picturesque country of Aram-Naharaim, past Circesium and Rehoboth-of-the-
River, and many another ancient place mentioned in the story of the Patriarchs, till through 
dwindling hills they reached His-that marvellous site which travellers praise as one of the great 
viewpoints of the world-and looked out at last upon the land of their captivity, the boundless, 
almost level tracts of Chaldea, the first home of the race, the traditional Garden of Eden. But of 
all that we are told nothing. Every eye in the huge caravans seems to have been as the eyes of the 
blinded king whom they carried with them, -able to weep, but not to see. 
One fact, however, was too large to be missed by these sad, wayworn men; and it has left traces 
on their literature. In passing from home to exile, the Jews passed from the hills to the plain. 
They were highlanders. Jerusalem lies four thousand feet above the sea. From its roofs the 
skyline is mostly a line of hills. To leave the city on almost any side you have to descend. The last 
monuments of their fatherland, on which the emigrants’ eyes could have lingered, were the high 
crests of Lebanon; the first prospect of their captivity was a monotonous level. The change was 

the more impressive, that to the hearts of the Hebrews it could not fail to be sacramental. From 
the mountains came the dew to their native crofts-the dew which, of all earthly blessings, was 
likest God’s grace. For their prophets, the ancient hills had been the symbols of Jehovah’s 
faithfulness. In leaving their highlands, therefore, the Jews not only left the kind of country to 
which their habits were most adapted and all their natural affections clung; they left the chosen 
abode of God, the most evident types of His grace, the perpetual witnesses to His covenant. 
Ezekiel constantly employs the mountains to describe his fatherland. But it is far more with a 
sacramental longing than a mere homesickness that a psalmist of the Exile cries out, "I will lift 
up mine eyes to the hills: from whence cometh mine help?" or that our prophet exclaims: "How 
beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth 
peace; that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth." 
By the route sketched above, it is at least seven hundred miles from Jerusalem to Babylon-a 
distance which, when we take into account that many of the captives walked in fetters, cannot 
have occupied them less than three months. We may form some conception of the aspect of the 
caravans from the transportations of captives which are figured on the Assyrian monuments, as 
in the Assyrian basement in the British Museum. From these it appears as if families were not 
separated, but marched together. Mules, asses, camels, ox-waggons, and the captives themselves 
carried goods. Children and women suckling infants were allowed to ride on the waggons. At 
intervals fully-armed soldiers walked in pairs. 
I. 
Mesopotamia, the land "in the middle of the rivers," Euphrates and Tigris, consists of two 
divisions, an upper and a lower. The dividing line crosses from near Hit or His on the Euphrates 
to below Samarah on the Tigris. Above this line the country is a gently undulating plain of 
secondary formation at some elevation above the sea. But lower Mesopotamia is absolutely flat 
land, an unbroken stretch of alluvial soil, scarcely higher than the Persian Gulf, upon which it 
steadily encroaches. Chaldea was confined to this Lower Mesopotamia, and was not larger, 
Rawlinson estimates, than the kingdom of Denmark. It is the monotonous level which first 
impresses the traveller; but if the season be favourable, he sees this only as the theatre of vast 
and varied displays of colour, which all visitors vie with one another in describing: "It is like a 
rich carpet"; "emerald green, enamelled with flowers of every hue"; "tall wild grasses and broad 
extents of waving reeds"; "acres of water-lilies"; "acres of pansies." There was no such country in 
ancient times for wheat, barley, millet, and sesame; tamarisks, poplars, and palms; here and 
there heavy jungle; with flashing streams and canals thickly athwart the whole, and all shining 
the more brilliantly for the interrupting patches of scurvy, nitrous soil, and the grey sandy 
setting of the desert with its dry scrub. The possible fertility of Chaldea is incalculable. But there 
are drawbacks. Bounded to the north by so high a tableland, to the south and southwest by a 
super-heated gulf and broad desert, Mesopotamia is the scene of violent changes of atmosphere. 
The languor of the flat country, the stagnancy and sultriness of the air, of which not only 
foreigners but the natives themselves complain, is suddenly invaded by southerly winds, of 
tremendous force and laden with clouds of fine sand, which render the air so dense as to be 
suffocating, and "produce a lurid red haze intolerable to the eyes." Thunderstorms are frequent, 
and there are very heavy rains. But the winds are the most tremendous. In such an atmosphere 
we may perhaps discover the original shapes and sounds of Ezekiel’s turbulent visions-"the fiery 
wheels; the great cloud with a fire infolding itself; the colour of amber," with "sapphire," or lapiz
lazuli, breaking through; "the sound of a great rushing." Also the Mesopotamian floods are 
colossal. The increase of both Tigris and Euphrates is naturally more violent and irregular than 
that of the Nile. Frequent risings of these rivers spread desolation with inconceivable rapidity, 
and they ebb only to leave pestilence behind them. If civilisation is to continue, there is need of 
vast and incessant operations on the part of man. 

Thus, both by its fertility and by its violence, this climate-before the curse of God fell on those 
parts of the world-tended to develop a numerous and industrious race of men, whose numbers 
were swollen from time to time both by forced and by voluntary immigration. The population 
must have been very dense. The triumphal lists of Assyrian conquerors of the land, as well as the 
rubbish mounds which today cover its surface, testify to innumerable villages and towns; while 
the connecting canals and fortifications, by the making of them and the watching of them, must 
have filled even the rural districts with the hum and activity of men. Chaldea, however, did not 
draw all her greatness from herself. There was immense traffic with East and West, between 
which Babylon lay, for the greater part of antiquity, the world’s central market and exchange. 
The city was practically a port on the Persian Gulf, by canals from which vessels reached her 
wharves direct from Arabia, India, and Africa. Down the Tigris and Euphrates rafts brought the 
produce of Armenia and the Caucasus; but of greater importance than even these rivers were the 
roads, which ran from Sardis to Shushan, traversed Media, penetrated Bactria and India, and 
may be said to have connected the Jaxartes and the Ganges with the Nile and the harbours of the 
Ægean Sea. These roads all crossed Chaldea and met at Babylon. Together with the rivers and 
ocean highways, they poured upon her markets the traffic of the whole ancient world. 
It was, in short, the very centre of the world-the most populous and busy region of His earth-to 
which God sent His people for their exile. The monarch, who transplanted them, was the genius 
of Babylonia incarnate. The chief soldier of his generation, Nebuchadrezzar will live in history as 
one of the greatest builders of all time. But he fought as he built - that he might traffic. His 
ambition was to turn the trade with India from the Red Sea to the Persian Gulf, and he thought 
to effect this by the destruction of Tyre, by the transportation of Arab and Nabathean merchants 
to Babylon, and by the deepening and regulation of the river between Babylon and the sea. 
There is no doubt that Nebuchadrezzar carried the Jews to Babylon not only for political 
reasons, but in order to employ them upon those large works of irrigation and the building of 
cities, for which his ambition required hosts of labourers. Thus the exiles were planted, neither 
in military prisons nor in the comparative isolation of agricultural colonies, but just where 
Babylonian life was most busy, where they were forced to share and contribute to it, and could 
not help feeling the daily infection of their captor’s habits. Do not let us forget this. It will 
explain much in what we have to study. It will explain how the captivity, which God inflicted 
upon the Jews as a punishment, might become in time a new sin to them, and why, when the 
day of redemption arrived, so many forgot that their citizenship was in Zion, and clung to the 
traffic and the offices of Babylon. 
The majority of the exiles appear to have been settled within the city, or, as it has been more 
correctly called, "the fortified district," of Babylon itself. Their mistress was thus constantly 
before them, at once their despair and their temptation. Lady of Kingdoms she lifted herself to 
heaven from broad wharves and ramparts, by wide flights of stairs and terraces, high walls and 
hanging gardens, pyramids and towers-so colossal in her buildings, so imperially lavish of space 
between! No wonder that upon that vast, far-spreading architecture, upon its great squares and 
between its high portals guarded by giant bulls, the Jew felt himself, as he expressed it, but a 
poor worm. If, even as they stand in our museums, captured and catalogued, one feels as if one 
crawled in the presence of the fragments of these striding monsters, with how much more of the 
feeling of the worm must the abject members of that captive nation have writhed before the face 
of the city, which carried these monsters as the mere ornaments of her skirts, and rose above all 
kingdoms with her strong feet upon the poor and the meek of the earth? 
Ah, the despair of it! To see her every day so glorious, to be forced to help her ceaseless growth, -
and to think how Jerusalem, the daughter of Zion, lay forsaken in ruins! Yet the despair 
sometimes gave way to temptation. There was not an outline or horizon visible to the captive 
Jew, not a figure in the motley crowds in which he moved, but must have fascinated him with 

the genius of his conquerors. In that level land no mountain, with its witness of God, broke the 
skyline; but the work of man was everywhere: curbed and scattered rivers, artificial mounds, 
buildings of brick, gardens torn from their natural beds and hung high in air by cunning hands 
to please the taste of a queen; lavish wealth and force and cleverness, all at the command of one 
human will. The signature ran across the whole, "I have done this, and with mine own hand 
have I gotten me my wealth"; and all the nations of the earth came and acknowledged the 
signature, and worshipped the great city. It was fascinating merely to look on such cleverness, 
success, and self-confidence; and who was the poor Jew that he, too, should not be drawn with 
the intoxicated nations to the worship of this glory that filled his horizon? If his eyes rose higher, 
and from these enchantments of men sought refuge in the heavens above, were not even they 
also a Babylonian realm? Did not the Chaldean claim the great lights there for his patron gods? 
were not the movements of sun, moon, and planets the secret of his science? did not the tyrant 
believe that the very stars in their courses fought for him? And he was vindicated; he was 
successful; he did actually rule the world. There seemed to be no escape from the enchantments 
of this sorceress city, as the prophets called her, and it is not wonderful that so many Jews fell 
victims to her worldliness and idolatry. 
II. 
The social condition of the Jews in exile is somewhat obscure, and yet, both in connection with 
the date and with the exposition of some portions of "Second Isaiah," it is an element of the 
greatest importance, of which we ought to have as definite an idea as possible. 
What are the facts? By far the most significant is that which faces us at the end of the Exile. 
There, some sixty years after the earlier, and some fifty years after the later, of 
Nebuchadnezzar’s two deportations, we find the Jews a largely multiplied and still regularly 
organised nation, with considerable property and decided political influence. Not more than 
forty thousand can have gone into exile, but forty-two thousand returned, and yet left a large 
portion of the nation behind them. The old families and clans survived; the social ranks were 
respected; the rich still held slaves; and the former menials of the temple could again be 
gathered together. Large subscriptions were raised for the pilgrimage, and for the restoration of 
the temple; a great host of cattle was taken. To such a state of affairs do we see any traces 
leading up through the Exile itself? We do. 
The first host of exiles, the captives of 598, comprised, as we have seen, the better classes of the 
nation, and appear to have enjoyed considerable independence. They were not scattered, like the 
slaves in North America, as domestic bondsmen over the surface of the land. Their condition 
must have much more closely resembled that of the better-treated exiles in Siberia; though of 
course, as we have seen, it was not a Siberia, but the centre of civilisation, to which they were 
banished. They remained in communities, with their own official heads, and at liberty to consult 
their prophets. They were sufficiently in touch with one another, and sufficiently numerous, for 
the enemies of Babylon to regard them as a considerable political influence, and to treat with 
them for a revolution against their captors. But Ezekiel’s strong condemnation of this intrigue 
exhibits their leaders on good terms with the government. Jeremiah bade them throw 
themselves into the life of the land; buy and sell, and increase their families and property. At the 
same time, we cannot but observe that it is only religious sins, with which Ezekiel upbraids 
them. When he speaks of civic duty or social charity, he either refers to their past or to the life of 
the remnant still in Jerusalem. There is every reason to believe, therefore, that this captivity was 
an honourable and an easy one. The captives may have brought some property with them; they 
had leisure for the pursuit of business and for the study and practice of their religion. Some of 
them suffered, of course, from the usual barbarity of Oriental conquerors, and were made 
eunuchs; some, by their learning and abstinence, rose to high positions in the court. (The Book 
of Daniel) Probably to the end of the Exile they remained "the good figs," as Jeremiah had called 

them. Theirs was, perhaps, the literary work of the Exile; and theirs, too, may have been the 
wealth which rebuilt Jerusalem. 
But it was different with the second captivity, of 589. After the famine, the burning of the city, 
and the prolonged march, this second host of exiles must have reached Babylonia in an 
impoverished condition. They were a lower class of men. They had exasperated their 
conquerors, who, before the march began, subjected many of them to mutilation and cruel 
death; and it is, doubtless, echoes of their experience which we find in the more bitter 
complaints of our prophet, This is a people robbed and spoiled; all of them snared in holes, and 
hid in prison-houses: they are for a prey, and for a spoil. "Thou" (that is, Babylon), "didst show 
them no mercy; upon the aged hast thou very heavily laid thy yoke." (Isa_42:22; Isa_47:6) 
Nebuchadrezzar used them for his building, as Pharaoh had used their forefathers. Some of 
them, or of their countrymen who had reached Babylonia before them, became the domestic 
slaves and chattels of their conquerors. Among the contracts and bills of sale of this period we 
find the cases of slaves with apparently Jewish names. 
In short, the state of the Jews in Babylonia resembled what seems to have been their fortune 
wherever they have settled in a foreign land. Part of them despised and abused, forced to labour 
or overtaxed: part left alone to cultivate literature or to gather wealth. Some treated with 
unusual rigour-and perhaps a few of these with reason, as dangerous to the government of the 
land-but some also, by the versatile genius of their race, advancing to a high place in the political 
confidence of their captors. 
Their application to literature, to their religion, and to commerce must be specially noted. 
1. Nothing is more striking in the writings of Ezekiel than the air of large leisure which invests 
them. Ezekiel lies passive; he broods, gazes, and builds his vision up, in a fashion like none of his 
terser predecessors; for he had time on his hands, not available to them in days when the history 
of the nation was still running. Ezekiel’s style swells to a greater fulness of rhetoric; his pictures 
of the future are elaborated with the most minute detail. Prophets before him were speakers, but 
he is a writer. Many in Israel besides Ezekiel took advantage of the leisure of the Exile to the 
great increase and arrangement of the national literature. Some Assyriologists have lately 
written, as if the schools of Jewish scribes owed their origin entirely to the Exile. But there were 
scribes in Israel before this. What the Exile did for these, was to provide them not only with the 
leisure from national business which we have noted, but with a powerful example of their craft 
as well. Babylonia at this time was a land full of scribes and makers of libraries. They wrote a 
language not very different from the Jewish, and cannot but have powerfully infected their 
Jewish fellows with the spirit of their toil and of their methods. To the Exile we certainly owe a 
large part of the historical books of the Old Testament, the arrangement of some of the 
prophetic writings, as well as-though the amount of this is very uncertain-part of the 
codification of the Law. 
2. If the Exile was opportunity to the scribes, it can only have been despair to the priests. In this 
foreign land the nation was unclean; none of the old sacrifice or ritual was valid, and the people 
were reduced to the simplest elements of religion-prayer, fasting, and the reading of religious 
books. We shall find our prophecy noting the clamour of the exiles to God for "ordinances of 
righteousness"-that is, for the institution of legal and valid rites. (Isa_58:2) But the great lesson, 
which prophecy brings to the people of the Exile, is that pardon and restoration to God’s favour 
are won only by waiting upon Him with all the heart. It was possible, of course, to observe some 
forms; to gather at intervals to inquire of the Lord, to keep the Sabbath, and to keep fasts. The 
first of these practices, out of which the synagogue probably took its rise, is noted by our 
prophet, (Isa_58:13-14) and he enforces Sabbath-keeping with words that add the blessing of 
prophecy to the law’s ancient sanction of that institution. Four annual fasts were instituted in 
memory of the dark days of Jerusalem-the day of the beginning of Nebuchadrezzar’s siege in the 

tenth month, the day of the capture in the fourth month, the day of the destruction in the fifth 
month, and the day of Gedaliah’s murder in the tenth month. It might have been thought, that 
solemn anniversaries of a disaster so recent and still unrepaired would be kept with sincerity; 
but our prophet illustrates how soon even the most outraged feelings may grow formal, and how 
on their days of special humiliation, while their captivity was still real, the exiles could oppress 
their own bondsmen and debtors. But there is no religious practice of this epoch more apparent 
through our prophecies than the reading of Scripture. Israel’s hope was neither in sacrifice, nor 
in temple, nor in vision nor in lot, but in God’s written Word; and when a new prophet arose, 
like the one we are about to study, he did not appeal for his authorisation, as previous prophets 
had done, to the fact of his call or inspiration, but it was enough for him to point to some former 
word of God, and cry, "See! at last the day has dawned for the fulfilment of that." Throughout 
Second Isaiah this is what the anonymous prophet cares to establish that the facts of today fit 
the promise of yesterday. We shall not understand our great prophecy unless we realise a people 
rising from fifty years’ close study of Scripture, in strained expectation of its immediate 
fulfilment. 
3. The third special feature of the people in exile is their application to commerce. At home the 
Jews had not been a commercial people. But the opportunities of their Babylonian residence 
seem to have started them upon those habits, for which, through their longer exile in our era, 
the name of Jew has become a synonym. If that be so, Jeremiah’s advice "to build and plant." 
(Jer_29:1-32) is historic, for it means no less than that the Jews should throw themselves into 
the life of the most trafficking nation of the time. Their increasing wealth proves how they 
followed this advice, -as well as perhaps such passages as Isa_55:2, in which the commercial 
spirit is reproached for overwhelming the nobler desires of religion. The chief danger, incurred 
by the Jews from an intimate connection with the commerce of Babylonia, lay in the close 
relations of Babylonian commerce with Babylonian idolatry. The merchants of Mesopotamia 
had their own patron gods. In completing business contracts, a man had to swear by his idols, 
and might have to enter their temples. In Isa_65:11, Jews are blamed for "forsaking Jehovah, 
and forgetting My holy mountain; preparing a table for Luck, and filling up mixed wine to 
Fortune." Here it is more probable that mercantile speculation, rather than any other form of 
gambling, is intended. 
III. 
But while all this is certain and needing to be noted about the habits of the mass of the people, 
what little trace it has left in the best literature of the period! We have already noticed in that the 
great absence of local colour. The truth is that what we have been trying to describe as Jewish 
life in Babylon was only a surface over deeps in which the true life of the nation was at work-was 
volcanically at work. Throughout the Exile the true Jew lived inwardly. "Out of the depths do I 
cry to Thee, O Lord." He was the inhabitant not so much of a foreign prison as of his own broken 
heart. "He sat by the rivers of Babylon; but he thought upon Zion." Is it not a proof of what 
depths in human nature were being stirred, that so little comes to the surface to tell us of the 
external conditions of those days? There are no fossils in the strata of the earth, which have been 
cast forth from her inner fires; and if we find few traces of contemporary life in these deposits of 
Israel’s history now before us, it is because they date from an age in which the nation was 
shaken and boiling to its centre. 
For if we take the writings of this period-the Book of Lamentations, the Psalms of the Exile, and 
parts of other books-and put them together, the result is the impression of one of the strangest 
decompositions of human nature into its elements which the world has ever seen. Suffering and 
sin, recollection, remorse and revenge, fear and shame and hate-over the confusion of these the 
Spirit of God broods as over a second chaos, and draws each of them forth in turn upon some 
articulate prayer. Now it is the crimson flush of shame: "our soul is exceedingly filled with 

contempt." Now it is the black rush of hate; for if we would see how hate can rage, we must go to 
the Psalms of the Exile, which call on the God of vengeance and curse the enemy and dash the 
little ones against the stones. But the deepest surge of all in that whirlpool of misery was the 
surge of sin. To change the figure, we see Israel’s spirit writhing upward from some pain it but 
partly understands, crying out, "What is this that keeps God from hearing and saving me?" 
turning like a wounded beast from the face of its master to its sore again, understanding as no 
brute could the reason of its plague, till confession after confession breaks away and the penalty 
is accepted, and acknowledged guilt seems almost to act as an anodyne to the penalty it explains. 
"Wherefore doth a living man complain, a man for the punishment of his sins? If Thou, Jehovah, 
shouldest mark iniquity who shall stand?" No wonder, that with such a conscience the Jews 
occupied the Exile in writing the moral of their delinquent history, or that the rest of their 
literature which dates from that time should have remained ever since the world’s confessional. 
But in this awful experience, there is still another strain, as painful as the rest, but pure and very 
eloquent of hope-the sense of innocent suffering. We cannot tell the sources, from which this 
considerable feeling may have gathered during the Exile, any more than we can trace from how 
many of the upper folds of a valley the tiny rivulets start, which form the stream that issues from 
its lower end. One of these sources may have been, as we have already suggested, the experience 
of Jeremiah; another very probably sprang with every individual conscience in the new 
generation. Children come even to exiles, and although they bear the same pain with the same 
nerves as their fathers, they do so with a different conscience. The writings of the time dwell 
much on the sufferings of the children. The consciousness is apparent in them, that souls are 
born into the wrath of God, as well as banished there. "Our fathers have sinned and are not, and 
we bear their iniquities." This experience developed with great force, till Israel felt that she 
suffered not under God’s wrath, but for His sake; and so passed from the conscience of the felon 
to that of the martyr. But if we are to understand the prophecy we are about to study, we must 
remember how near akin these two consciences must have been in exiled Israel, and how easy it 
was for a prophet to speak-as our prophet does, sometimes with confusing rapidity of exchange-
now in the voice of the older and more guilty generation, and now in the voice of the younger 
and less deservedly punished. 
Our survey of the external as well as the internal conditions of Israel in Exile is now finished. It 
has, I think, included every known feature of their experience in Babylonia, which could possibly 
illustrate our prophecy-dated, as we have felt ourselves compelled to date this, from the close of 
the Exile. Thus, as we have striven to trace, did Israel suffer, learn, grow, and hope for fifty 
years-under Nebuchadrezzar till 561, under his successor Evil-merodach till 559, under 
Neriglassar till 554, and then under the usurper Nabunahid. The last named probably oppressed 
the Jews more grievously than their previous tyrants, but with the aggravation of their yoke 
there grew evident, at the same time, the certainty of their deliverance. In 549 Cyrus overthrew 
the Medes, and became lord of Asia from the Indus to the Halys. From that event his conquest of 
Babylonia, however much delayed, could only be a matter of time. 
It is at this juncture that our prophecy breaks in. Taking for granted Cyrus’ sovereignty of the 
Medes, it still looks forward to his capture of Babylon. Let us, before advancing to its exposition, 
once more cast a rapid glance over the people, to whom it is addressed and whom in their half 
century of waiting for it we have been endeavouring to describe. 
First and most manifest, they are a people with a conscience-a people with the most awful and 
most articulate conscience that ever before or since exposed a nation’s history or tormented a 
generation with the curse of their own sin and the sin of their fathers. Behind them, ages of 
delinquent life, from the perusal of the record of which, with its regularly recurring moral, they 
have just risen: the Books of Kings appear to have been finished after the accession of Evil-

merodach in 561. Behind them also nearly fifty years of sore punishment for their sins-
punishment, which, as their Psalms confess, they at last understand and accept as deserved. 
But, secondly, they are a people with a great hope. With their awful consciousness of guilt, they 
have the assurance that their punishment has its limits; that, to quote Isa_40:2, it is a "set 
period of service": a former word of God having fixed it at not more than seventy years, and 
having promised the return of the nation thereafter to their own land. 
And, thirdly, they are a People with a great opportunity. History is at last beginning to set 
towards the vindication of their hope: Cyrus, the master of the age, is moving rapidly, 
irresistibly, down upon their tyrants. 
But, fourthly, in face of all their hope and opportunity, they are a people disorganised, 
distracted, and very impotent-"worms and not men," as they describe themselves. The 
generation of the tried and responsible leaders of the days of their independence are all dead, for 
"flesh is like grass"; no public institutions remain in their midst such as ever in the most 
hopeless periods of the past proved a rallying-point of their scattered forces. There is no king, 
temple, nor city; nor is there any great personality visible to draw their little groups together, 
marshal them, and lead them forth behind him. Their one hope is in the Word of God, for which 
they "wait more than they that watch for the morning"; and the one duty of their nameless 
prophets is to persuade them that this Word has at last come to pass, and, in the absence of 
king, Messiah, priest, and great prophet, is able to lift them to the opportunity that God’s hand 
has opened before them, and to the accomplishment of their redemption. 
Upon Israel, with such a Conscience, such a Hope, such an Opportunity, and such an unaided 
Reliance on God’s bare Word, that Word at last broke in a chorus of voices. 
Of these the first, as was most meet, spoke pardon to the people’s conscience and the 
proclamation that their set period of warfare was accomplished; the second announced that 
circumstances and the politics of the world, hitherto adverse, would be made easy to their 
return; the third bade them, in their bereavement of earthly leaders, and their own impotence, 
find their eternal confidence in God’s Word; while the fourth lifted them, as with one heart and 
voice, to herald the certain return of Jehovah, at the head of His people, to His own City, and His 
quiet, shepherdly rule of them on their own land. 
These herald voices form the prologue to our prophecy, Isa_40:1-11, to which we will now turn. 
 
 
Isaiah 40:1 
 
THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF ISRAEL AND THE RIGHTEOUSNESS O F GOD 
IN the chapters which we have been studying we have found some difficulty with one of our 
prophet’s keynotes-"right" or "righteousness." In the chapters to come we shall find this 
difficulty increase, unless we take some trouble now to define how much the word denotes in 
Isaiah 40-66. There is no part of Scripture, in which the term "righteousness" suffers so many 
developments of meaning. To leave these vague, as readers usually do, or to fasten upon one and 
all the technical meaning of righteousness in Christian theology, is not only to obscure the 
historical reference and moral force of single passages, -it is to miss one of the main arguments 
of the prophecy. We have read enough to see that "righteousness" was the great question of the 
Exile. But what was brought into question was not only the righteousness of the people, but the 
righteousness of their God. In Isaiah 40-66 righteousness is more often claimed as a Divine 
attribute, than enforced as a human duty or ideal. 

I. RIGHTEOUSNESS 
Ssedheq, the Hebrew root for righteousness, had, like the Latin "rectus," in its earliest and now 
almost forgotten uses, a physical meaning. This may have been either "straightness," or more 
probably "soundness,"-the state in which a thing is "all right." "Paths of righteousness," in 
Psa_23:1-6 and Isa_40:4, are not necessarily straight paths, but rather sure, genuine, safe 
paths. Like all physical metaphors, like our own words "straight" and "right," the applicability of 
the term to moral conduct was exceedingly elastic. It has been attempted to gather most of its 
meaning under the definition of "conformity to norm"; and so many are the instances in which 
the word has a forensic force, as of "vindication" or "justification," that some have claimed this 
for its original, or, at least, its governing sense. But it is improbable that either of these 
definitions conveys the simplest or most general sense of the word. Even if "conformity" or 
"justification" were ever the prevailing sense of ssedheq, there are a number of instances in 
which its meaning far overflows the limits of such definitions. Every one can see how a word, 
which may generally be used to express an abstract idea, like "conformity," or a formal relation 
towards a law or person, like "justification," might come to be applied to the actual virtues, 
which realise that idea or lift a character into that relation. Thus righteousness might mean 
justice, or truth, or almsgiving, or religious obedience, -to each of which, in fact, the Hebrew 
word was at various times specially applied. Or righteousness might mean virtue in general, 
virtue apart from all consideration of law or duty whatsoever. In the prophet Amos, for instance, 
"righteousness" is applied to a goodness so natural and spontaneous that no one could think of it 
for a moment as conformity to norm or fulfilment of law. 
In short, it is impossible to give a definition of the Hebrew word, which our version renders as 
"righteousness," less wide than our English word "right." "Righteousness" is "right" in all its 
senses, -natural, legal, personal, religious. It is to be all right, to be right-hearted, to be 
consistent, to be thorough; but also to be in the right, to be justified, to be vindicated; and, in 
particular, it may mean to be humane (as with Amos), to be just (as with Isaiah), to be correct or 
true to fact (as sometimes with our own prophet), to fulfil the ordinances of religion, and 
especially the command about almsgiving (as with the later Jews). 
Let us now keep in mind that righteousness could express a relation, or a general quality of 
character, or some particular virtue. For we shall find traces of all these meanings in our 
prophet’s application of the term to Israel and to God. 
II. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF ISRAEL 
One of the simplest forms of the use of "righteousness" in the Old Testament is when it is 
employed in the case of ordinary quarrels between two persons; in which for one of them "to be 
righteous" means "to be right" or "in the right." (Gen_38:26; Cf. 2Sa_15:4) Now to the Hebrew 
all life and religion was based upon covenants between two, -between man and man and 
between man and God. Righteousness meant fidelity to the terms of those covenants. The 
positive contents of the word in any single instance of its use would, therefore, depend on the 
faithfulness and delicacy of conscience by which those terms were interpreted. In early Israel 
this conscience was not so keen as it afterwards came to be, and accordingly Israel’s sense of 
their righteousness towards God was, to begin with, a comparatively shallow one. When a 
Psalmist asseverates his righteousness and pleads it as the ground for God rewarding him, it is 
plain that he is able with sincerity to make a claim, so repellent to a Christian’s feeling, just 
because he has not anything like a Christian’s conscience of what God demands from man. As 
Calvin says on Psa_18:20 "David here represents God as the President of an athletic contest, 
who had chosen him as one of His champions, and David knows that so long as he keeps to the 
rules of the contest, so long will God defend him." It is evident that in such an assertion 
righteousness cannot mean perfect innocence, but simply the good conscience of a man, who, 

with simple ideas of what is demanded from him, feels that on the whole "he has" (slightly to 
paraphrase Calvin) "played fair." 
Two things, almost simultaneously, shook Israel out of this primitive and naive self-
righteousness. History went against them, and the prophets quickened their conscience. The 
effect of the former of these two causes will be clear to us, if we recollect the judicial element in 
the Hebrew righteousness, -that it often meant not so much to be right, as to be vindicated or 
declared right. History, to Israel, was God’s supreme tribunal. It was the faith of the people, 
expressed over and over again in the Old Testament, that the godly man is vindicated or justified 
by his prosperity: "the way of the ungodly shall perish." And Israel felt themselves to be in the 
right, just as. David, in Psa_18:1-50, felt himself, because God had accredited them with success 
and victory. But when the decision of history went against the nation, when they were 
threatened with expulsion from their land and with extinction as a people, that just meant that 
the Supreme Judge of men was giving His sentence against them. Israel had broken the terms of 
the Covenant. They had lost their right; they were no longer "righteous." The keener conscience, 
developed by prophecy, swiftly explained this sentence of history. This declaration, that the 
people were unrighteous, was due, the prophet said, to the people’s sins. Isaiah not only 
exclaimed, "Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire"; he added, in equal 
indictment, "How is the faithful city become a harlot! it was full of justice, righteousness lodged 
in it, but now murderers: thy princes are rebellious, they judge not the fatherless, neither doth 
the cause of the widow come before them." To Isaiah and the earlier prophets Israel was 
unrighteous because it was so immoral. With their strong social conscience, righteousness 
meant to these prophets the practice of civic virtues, -truth-telling, honesty between citizens, 
tenderness to the poor, inflexible justice in high places. 
Here then we have two possible meanings for Israel’s righteousness in the prophetic writings, 
allied and necessary to one another, yet logically distinct, -the one a becoming righteous through 
the exercise of virtue, the other a being shown to be righteous by the voice of history. In the one 
case righteousness is the practical result of the working of the Spirit of God; in the other it is 
vindication, or justification, by the Providence of God. Isaiah and the earlier prophets, while the 
sentence of history was still not executed and might through the mercy of God be revoked, 
incline to employ righteousness predominantly in the former sense. But it will be understood 
how, after the Exile, it was the latter, which became the prevailing determination of the word. By 
that great disaster God finally uttered the clear sentence, of which previous history had been but 
the foreboding. Israel in exile was fully declared to be in the wrong-to be unrighteous. As a 
church, she lay under the ban; as a nation, she was discredited before the nations of the world. 
And her one longing, hope, and effort during the weary years of Captivity was to have her right 
vindicated again, was to be restored to right relations to God and to the world, under the 
Covenant. 
This is the predominant meaning of the term, as applied to Israel, in Isaiah 40-66. Israel’s 
unrighteousness is her state of discredit and disgrace under the hands of God; her 
righteousness, which she hopes for, is her restoral to her station and destiny as the elect people. 
To our Christian habit of thinking, it is very natural to read the frequent and splendid phrases in 
which "righteousness" is attributed or promised to the people of God in this evangelical 
prophecy, as if righteousness were that inward assurance and justification from an evil 
conscience, which, as we are taught by the New Testament, is provided for us through the death 
of Christ, and inwardly sealed to us by the Holy Ghost, irrespective of the course of our outward 
fortune. But if we read that meaning into "righteousness" in Isaiah 40-66, we shall simply not 
understand some of the grandest passages of the prophecy. We must clearly keep in view, that 
while the prophet ceaselessly emphasises the pardon of God "spoken home to the heart" of the 
people as the first step towards their restoral, he does not apply the term righteousness to this 
inward justification, but to the outward vindication and accrediting of Israel by God before the 

whole world, in their redemption from Captivity, and their reinstatement as His people. This is 
very clear from the way in which "righteousness" is coupled with "salvation" by the prophet, as 
(Isa_62:1) "I will not rest till her righteousness go forth as brightness, and her salvation as a 
lamp that burneth." Or again from the way in which righteousness and glory are put in parallel: 
(Isa_62:2) "And the nations shall see thy righteousness, and all kings thy glory." Or again in the 
way that "righteousness" and "renown" are identified: (Isa_61:11) "The Lord Jehovah will cause 
righteousness and renown to spring forth before all the nations." In each of these promises the 
idea of an external and manifest splendour is evident; not the inward peace of justification felt 
only by the conscience to which it has been granted, but the outward historical victory 
appreciable by the gross sense of the heathen. Of course the outward implies the inward, -this 
historical triumph is the crown of a religious process, the result of forgiveness and a long 
purification, -but while in the New Testament it is these which would be most readily called a 
people’s righteousness, it is the former (what the New Testament would rather call "the crown of 
life"), which has appropriated the name in Isaiah 40-66. The same is manifest from another 
text: (Isa_48:18) "O that thou hadst hearkened to My commandments; then had thy peace been 
as the River, and thy righteousness like the waves of the sea." Here "righteousness is not only 
not applied to inward morality, but set over against this as its external reward,"-the health and 
splendour which a good conscience produces. It is in the same external sense that the prophet 
talks of the "robe of righteousness" with its bridal splendour, and compares it to the appearance 
of "Spring." (Isa_61:10-11) 
For this kind of righteousness, this vindication by God before the world, Israel waited 
throughout the Exile. God addresses them as "they that pursue righteousness, that seek 
Jehovah." (Isa_51:1) And it is a closely allied meaning, though perhaps with a more inward 
application, when the people are represented as praying God to give them "ordinances of 
righteousness," (Isa_58:2) -that is, to prescribe such a ritual as will expiate their guilt and bring 
them into a right relation with Him. They sought in vain. The great lesson of the Exile was that 
not by works and performances, but through simply waiting upon the Lord, their righteousness 
should shine forth. Even this outward kind of justification was to be by faith. 
The other meaning of righteousness, however, -the sense of social and civic morality, which was 
its usual sense with the earlier prophets, -is not altogether excluded from the use of the word in 
Isaiah 40-66. Here are some commands and reproaches which seem to imply it. "Keep 
judgment, and do righteousness,"-where, from what follows, righteousness evidently means 
observing the Sabbath and doing no evil. (Isa_56:1) "And justice is fallen away backward, and 
righteousness standeth afar off, for truth is fallen in the street, and steadfastness cannot enter." 
(Isa_59:14) These must be terms for human virtues, for shortly afterwards it is said: "Jehovah 
was displeased because there was no justice." Again, "They seek Me as a nation that did 
righteousness"; (Isa_58:2) "Hearken unto Me, ye that know righteousness, a people-My law is in 
their hearts"; (Isa_51:7) "Thou meetest him that worketh righteousness"; (Isa_64:5) "No one 
sues in righteousness, and none goeth to law in truth." (Isa_59:4) In all these passages 
"righteousness" means something that man can know and do, his conscience and his duty, and 
is rightly to be distinguished from those others, in which "righteousness" is equivalent to the 
salvation, the glory, the peace, which only God’s power can bring. If the passages that employ 
"righteousness" in the sense of moral or religious observance really date from the Exile, then the 
interesting fact is assured to us that the Jews enjoyed some degree of social independence and 
responsibility during their Captivity. But it is a very striking fact that these passages all belong to 
chapters, the exilic origin of which is questioned even by critics, who assign the rest of Isaiah 40-
66 to the Exile. Yet, even if these passages have all to be assigned to the Exile, how few they are 
in number! How they contrast with the frequency, with which, in the earlier part of this book, -in 
the orations addressed by Isaiah to his own times, when Israel was still an independent state, -
"righteousness" is reiterated as the daily, practical duty of men, as justice, truthfulness, and 

charity between man and man! The extreme rarity of such inculcations in Isaiah 40-66 warns us 
that we must not expect to find here the same practical and political interest which formed so 
much of the charm and the force of Isa_1:1-31 - Isa_39:1-8. The nation has now no politics, 
almost no social morals. Israel are not citizens working out their own salvation in the market, 
the camp, and the senate; but captives waiting a deliverance in God’s time, which no act of theirs 
can hasten. It is not in the street that the interest of Second Isaiah lies: it is on the horizon. 
Hence the vague feeling of a distant splendour, which as the reader passes from Isa_39:1-8 to 
Isa_40:1-31, replaces in his mind the stir of living in a busy crowd, the close and throbbing sense 
of the civic conscience, the voice of statesmen, the clash of the weapons of war. There is no 
opportunity for individuals to reveal themselves. It is a nation waiting, indistinguishable in 
shadow, whose outlines only we see. It is no longer the thrilling practical cry, which sends men 
into the arenas of social life with every sinew in them strung: "Learn to do well; seek justice, 
relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow." It is rather the cry of one who 
still waits for his working day to dawn: "I will lift up mine eyes to the hills; from whence cometh 
my help?" Righteousness is not the near and daily duty, it is the far-off peace and splendour of 
skies, that have scarce begun to redden to the day. 
III. THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD 
But there was another Person, whose righteousness was in question during the Exile, and who 
Himself argues for it throughout our prophecy. Perhaps the most peculiar feature of the 
theology of Isaiah 40-66 is its argument for "the righteousness of Jehovah." 
Some critics maintain that righteousness, when applied to Jehovah, bears always a technical 
reference to His covenant with Israel. This is scarcely correct. Jehovah’s dealings with Israel 
were no doubt the chief of His dealings, and it is these, which He mainly quotes to illustrate His 
righteousness; but we have already studied passages, which prove to us that Jehovah’s 
righteousness was an absolute quality of His Godhead, shown to others besides Israel, and in 
loyalty to obligations different from the terms of His covenant with Israel. In Isa_41:1-29 
Jehovah calls upon the heathen to match their righteousness with His; righteousness was 
therefore a quality that might have been attributed to them as well as to Himself. Again, in 
Isa_45:19 "I, Jehovah, speak righteousness, I declare things that are right,"-righteousness 
evidently bears a general sense, and not one of exclusive application to God’s dealing with Israel. 
It is the same in the passage about Cyrus: (Isa_45:13) "I have raised him up in righteousness, I 
will make straight all his ways." Though Cyrus was called in connection with God’s purpose 
towards Israel, it is not that purpose which makes his calling righteous, but the fact that God 
means to carry him through, or, as the parallel verse says, "to make straight all his ways." These 
instances are sufficient to prove that the righteousness, which God attributes to His words, to 
His actions, and to Himself, is a general quality not confined to His dealings with Israel under 
the covenant, -though, of course, most clearly illustrated by these. 
If now we enquire, what this absolute quality of Jehovah’s Deity really means, we may 
conveniently begin with His application of it to His Word. In Isa_41:1-29 He summons the other 
religions to exhibit predictions that are true to fact. "Who hath declared it on-ahead that we may 
know, or from aforetime that we may say, He is ssaddiq." Here ssaddiq simply means "right, 
correct," true to fact. It is much the same meaning in Isa_43:9, where the verb is used of 
heathen predicters, "that they may be shown to be right," or "correct" (English version, 
"justified"). But when, in Isa_46:1-13, the word is applied by Jehovah to His own speech, it has a 
meaning of far richer contents, than mere correctness, and proves to us that after all the Hebrew 
ssedheq was almost as versatile as the English "right." The following passage shows us that the 
righteousness of Jehovah’s speech is its clearness, straightforwardness, and practical 
effectiveness: "Not in secret have I spoken, in a place of the land of darkness,"-this has been 
supposed to refer to the remote or subterranean localities in which heathen oracles mysteriously 

entrenched themselves, -"I have not said to the seed of Jacob, In Chaos seek Me. I am Jehovah, 
a Speaker of righteousness, a Publisher of straight things. Be gathered and come, draw near 
together, O remnants of the nations. They know not that carry the log of their image, and pray to 
a god who does not save. Publish and bring near, yea, let them take counsel together. Who 
caused this to be heard of old? long since hath published it? Is it not I, Jehovah, and there is 
none else God beside Me; a God righteous and a Saviour, there is none except Me. Turn unto Me 
and be saved, all ends of Earth, for I am God, and there is none else. By Myself have I sworn, 
gone forth from My mouth hath righteousness: a word and it shall not turn; for to Me shall bow 
every knee, shall swear every tongue. Truly in Jehovah, shall they say of Me, are righteousnesses 
and strength. To Him shall it come, and shamed shall be all that are incensed against Him. In 
Jehovah shall be righteous and renowned all the seed of Israel." (Isa_45:19-25) 
In this very suggestive passage "righteousness" means far more than simple correctness of 
prediction. Indeed, it is difficult to distinguish how much it means, so quickly do its varying 
echoes throng upon our ear, from the new associations in which it is spoken. A word such as 
"righteousness" is like the sensitive tones of the human voice. Spoken in a desert, the voice is 
itself and nothing more; but utter it where the landscape is crowded with novel obstacles, and 
the original note is almost lost amid the echoes it startles. So with the "righteousness of 
Jehovah"; among the new associations in which the prophet affirms it, it starts novel repetitions 
of itself. Against the ambiguity of the oracles, it is echoed back as "clearness, 
straightforwardness, good faith"; (Isa_40:19) against their opportunism and want of foresight, it 
is described as equivalent to the capacity for arranging things beforehand and predicting what 
must come to pass, therefore as "purposefulness"; while against their futility, it is plainly 
"effectiveness and power to prevail." (Isa_40:23) It is the quality in God, which divides His 
Godhead with His power, something intellectual as well as moral, the possession of a reasonable 
purpose as well as fidelity towards it. 
This intellectual sense of righteousness, as reasonableness or purposefulness, is clearly 
illustrated by the way in which the prophet appeals, in order to enforce it, to Jehovah’s creation 
of the world. "Thus saith Jehovah, Creator of the heavens-He is the God-Former of the Earth 
and her Maker, He founded her; not Chaos did He create her, to be dwelt in did He form her." 
(Isa_45:18) The word "Chaos" here is the same as is used in opposition to "righteousness" in the 
following verse. The sentence plainly illustrates the truth, that whatever God does, He does not 
so as to issue in confusion, but with a reasonable purpose and for a practical end. We have here 
the repetition of that deep, strong note, which Isaiah himself so often sounded to the comfort of 
men in perplexity or despair, that God is at least reasonable, not working for nothing, nor 
beginning only to leave off, nor creating in order to destroy. The same God, says our prophet, 
who formed the earth in order to see it inhabited, must surely be believed to be consistent 
enough to carry to the end also His spiritual work among men. Our prophet’s idea of God’s 
righteousness, therefore, includes the idea of reasonableness; implies rational as well as moral 
consistency, practical sense as well as good faith; the conscience of a reasonable plan, and, 
perhaps also, the power to carry it through. 
To know that this great and varied meaning belongs to "righteousness" gives us new insight into 
those passages, which find in it all the motive and efficiency of the Divine action: "It pleased 
Jehovah for His righteousness"; (Isa_42:21) "His righteousness, it upheld Him; and He put on 
righteousness as a breastplate." (Isa_59:16-17) 
With such a righteousness did Jehovah deal with Israel. To her despair that He has forgotten 
her. He recounts the historical events by which He has made her His own, and affirms that He 
will carry them on; and you feel the expression both of fidelity and of the consciousness of ability 
to fulfil, in the words, "I will uphold thee with the right hand of My righteousness." "Right 
hand"-there is more than the touch of fidelity in this; there is the grasp of power. Again, to the 

Israel who was conscious of being His Servant, God says, "I, Jehovah, have called thee in 
righteousness"; and, taken with the context, the word plainly means good faith and intention to 
sustain and carry to success. 
It was easy to transfer the name "righteousness" from the character of God’s action to its results, 
but always, of course, in the vindication of His purpose and word. Therefore, just as the 
salvation of Israel, which was the chief result of the Divine purpose, is called Israel’s 
righteousness, so it is also called "Jehovah’s righteousness." Thus, in Isa_46:13 "I bring near My 
righteousness"; and in Isa_51:5 "My righteousness is near, My salvation is gone forth"; Isa_40:6 
"My salvation shall be forever, and My righteousness shall not be abolished." It seems to be in 
the same sense, of finished and visible results, that the skies are called upon "to pour down 
righteousness," and "the earth to open that they may be fruitful in salvation, and let her cause 
righteousness to spring up together" (Isa_45:8; cf. Isa_61:10 "My Lord Jehovah will cause 
righteousness to spring forth"). 
One passage is of great interest, because in it "righteousness" is used to play upon itself, in its 
two meanings of human duty and Divine effect- Isa_56:1, "Observe judgment"-probably 
religious ordinances-"and do righteousness; for My salvation is near to come, and My 
righteousness to be revealed." 
To complete our study of "righteousness" it is necessary to touch still upon one point. In Isaiah 
40-66 both the masculine and feminine forms of the Hebrew word for righteousness are used, 
and it has been averred that they are used with a difference. This opinion is entirely dispelled by 
a collation of the passages. I give the particulars in a note, from which it will be seen that both 
forms are indifferently employed for each of the many shades of meaning which "righteousness" 
bears in our prophecies. 
That the masculine and feminine forms sometimes occur, with the same or with different 
meanings, in the same verse, or in the next verse to one another, proves that the selection of 
them respectively cannot be due to any difference in the authorship of our prophecy. So that we 
are reduced to say that nothing accounts for their use, except, it might be, the exigencies of the 
metre. But who is able to prove this? 
 
 
Isaiah 40:1-11 
 
THE PROLOGUE: THE FOUR HERALD VOICES  
IT is only Voices which we hear in this Prologue. No forms can be discerned, whether of men or 
angels, and it is even difficult to make out the direction from which the Voices come. Only one 
thing is certain-that they break the night, that they proclaim the end of a long but fixed period, 
during which God has punished and forsaken His people. At first, the persons addressed are the 
prophets, that they may speak to the people (Isa_40:1-2); but afterwards Jerusalem as a whole 
is summoned to publish the good tidings. (Isa_40:9) This interchange between a part of the 
people and the whole-this commission to prophesy, made with one breath to some of the nation 
for the sake of the rest, and with the next breath to the entire nation-is a habit of our prophet to 
which we shall soon get accustomed. How natural and characteristic it is, is proved by its 
appearance in these very first verses. 
The beginning of the good tidings is Israel’s pardon; yet it seems not to be the people’s return to 
Palestine which is announced in consequence of this, so much as their God’s return to them. 
"Prepare ye the way of Jehovah, make straight a highway for our God. Behold the Lord Jehovah 
will come." We may, however, take "the way of Jehovah in the wilderness" to mean what it 

means in the sixty-eighth Psalm, -His going forth before His people and leading of them back; 
while the promise that He will come to "shepherd His flock" (Isa_40:11) is, of course, the 
promise that He will resume the government of Israel upon their own land. There can be no 
doubt, therefore, that this chapter was meant for the people at the close of their captivity in 
Babylon. But do not let us miss the pathetic fact that Israel is addressed not in her actual shape 
of a captive people in a foreign land, but under the name and aspect of her far-away desolate 
country. In these verses Israel is "Jerusalem, Zion, the cities of Judah" Such designations do not 
prove, as a few critics have rather pedantically supposed, that the writer of the verses lived in 
Judah and addressed himself to what was under his eyes. It is not the vision of a Jew at home 
that has determined the choice of these names, but the desire and the dream of a Jew abroad: 
that extraordinary passion, which, however distant might be the land of his exile, ever filled the 
Jew’s eyes with Zion, caused him to feel the ruin and forsakenness of his Mother more than his 
own servitude, and swept his patriotic hopes, across his own deliverance and return, to the 
greater glory of her restoration. There is nothing, therefore, to prevent us taking for granted, as 
we did in the previous chapter, that the speaker or speakers of these verses stood among the 
exiles themselves; but who they were-men or angels, prophets or scribes-is lost in the darkness 
out of which their music breaks. 
Nevertheless the prophecy is not anonymous. By these impersonal voices a personal revelation 
is made. The prophets may be nameless, but the Deity who speaks through them speaks as 
already known and acknowledged: "My people, saith your God." 
This is a point, which, though it takes for its expression no more than these two little pronouns, 
we must not hurriedly pass over. All the prophecy we are about to study may be said to hang 
from these pronouns. They are the hinges, on which the door of this new temple of revelation 
swings open before the long-expectant people. And, in fact, such a conscience and sympathy as 
these little words express form the necessary premise of all revelation. Revelation implies a 
previous knowledge of God, and cannot work upon men, except there already exist in them the 
sense that they and God somehow belong to each other. This sense need be neither pure, nor 
strong, nor articulate. It may be the most selfish and cowardly of guilty fears, -Jacob’s dread as 
he drew near Esau, whom he had treacherously supplanted, -the vaguest of ignorant desires, the 
Athenians’ worship of the Unknown God. But, whatever it is, the angel comes to wrestle with it, 
the apostle is sent to declare it; revelation in some form takes it as its premise and starting-
point. This previous sense of God may also be fuller than in the cases just cited. Take our Lord’s 
own illustration. Upon the prodigal in the strange country there surged again the far-ebbed 
memory of his home and childhood, of his years of familiarity with a Father; and it was this tide 
which carried back his penitent heart within the hearing of his Father’s voice, and the revelation 
of the love that became his new life. Now Israel, also in a far-off land, were borne upon the 
recollection of home: and of life in the favour of their God. We have: seen with what knowledge 
of Him and from what relations with Him they were banished. 
To the men of the Exile God was already a Name and an Experience, and because that Name was 
The Righteous, and that Experience was all grace and promise, these men waited for His Word 
more than they that wait for the morning; and when at length the Word broke from the long 
darkness and silence, they received it, though its bearers might be unseen and unaccredited, 
because they recognised and acknowledged in it Himself. He who spoke was their God, and they 
were His people. This conscience and sympathy was all the title or credential which the 
revelation required. It is, therefore, not too much to say, as we have said, that the two pronouns 
in Isa_40:1, are the necessary premise of the whole prophecy which that verse introduces. 
With this introduction we may now take up the four herald voices of the Prologue. Whatever 
may have been their original relation to one another, whether or not they came to Israel by 
different messengers, they are arranged (as we saw at the close of the previous chapter) in 

manifest order and progress of thought, and they meet in due succession the experiences of 
Israel at the close of the Exile. For the first of them (Isa_40:1-2) gives the "subjective assurance" 
of the coming redemption: it is the Voice of Grace. The second (Isa_40:3-5) proclaims the 
"objective reality" of that redemption: it may be called the Voice of Providence, or-to use the 
name by which our prophecy loves to entitle the just and victorious providence of God-the Voice 
of Righteousness. The third (Isa_40:6-8) uncovers the pledge and earnest of the redemption: in 
the weakness of men this shall be the Word of God. While the fourth (Isa_40:9-11) is the 
Proclamation of Jehovah’s restored kingdom, when He cometh as a shepherd to shepherd His 
people. To this progress and climax the music of the passage forms a perfect accompaniment. It 
would be difficult to find in any language lips that first more softly woo the heart, and then take 
to themselves so brave a trumpet of challenge and assurance. The opening is upon a few short 
pulses of music, which steal from heaven as gently as the first ripples of light in a cloudless 
dawn- 
Nahamu, nahamu ammi: 
Comfort ye, comfort ye my people: 
Dabberu ‘al3lev Yerushalaim. 
Speak upon the heart of Jerusalem. 
But then the trumpet-tone breaks forth, "Call unto her"; and on that high key the music stays, 
sweeping with the second voice across hill and dale like a company of swift horsemen, stooping 
with the third for a while to the elegy upon the withered grass, but then recovering itself, braced 
by all the strength of the Word of God, to peal from tower to tower with the fourth, upon the cry, 
"Behold, the Lord cometh," till it sinks almost from sound to sight, and yields us, as from the 
surface of still waters, that sweet reflection of the twenty-third Psalm with which the Prologue 
concludes. 
1. Comfort ye, comfort ye My people, saith your God 
Speak ye home to the heart of Jerusalem, and call unto her, 
That accomplished is her warfare, that absolved is her iniquity; 
That she hath received of Jehovah’s hand double for all her sins. 
This first voice, with the music of which our hearts have been thrilled ever since we can 
remember, speaks twice: first in a whisper, then in a call-the whisper of the Lover and the call of 
the Lord. "Speak ye home to the heart of Jerusalem, and call unto her." 
Now Jerusalem lay in ruins, a city through whose breached walls all the winds of heaven blew 
mournfully across her forsaken floors. And the "heart of Jerusalem," which was with her people 
in exile, was like the city-broken and defenceless. In that far-off, unsympathetic land it lay open 
to the alien; tyrants forced their idols upon it, the peoples tortured it with their jests. 
For they that led us captive required of us songs, 
And they that wasted us required of us mirth. 
But observe how gently the Divine Beleaguerer approaches, how softly He bids His heralds plead 
by the gaps, through which the oppressor has forced his idols and his insults. Of all human 
language they might use, God bids His messengers take and plead with the words with which a 
man will plead at a maiden’s heart, knowing that he has nothing but love to offer as right of 
entrance, and waiting until love and trust come out to welcome him. "Speak ye," says the 
original literally, "on to," or "up against" or "up round the heart of Jerusalem,"-a forcible 
expression, like the German "An das Herz," or the sweet Scottish, "It cam’ up roond my heart," 
and perhaps best rendered into English by the phrase, "Speak home to the heart." It is the 

ordinary Hebrew expression for wooing. As from man to woman when he wins her, the Old 
Testament uses it several times. To "speak home to the heart" is to use language in which 
authority and argument are both ignored, and love works her own inspiration. While the 
haughty Babylonian planted by force his idols, while the folly and temptations of heathendom 
surged recklessly in, God Himself, the Creator of this broken heart, its Husband and Inhabitant 
of old, stood lowly by its breaches, pleading in love the right to enter. But when entrance has 
been granted, see how He bids His heralds change their voice and disposition. The suppliant 
lover, being received, assumes possession and defence, and they, who were first bid whisper as 
beggars by each unguarded breach, now leap upon the walls to call from the accepted Lord of the 
city: "Fulfilled is thy time of service, absolved thine iniquity, received hast thou of Jehovah’s 
hand double for all thy sins." 
Now this is no mere rhetorical figure. This is the abiding attitude and aim of the Almighty 
towards men. God’s target is our heart. His revelation, whatever of law or threat it send before, 
is, in its own superlative clearness and urgency, Grace. It comes to man by way of the heart; not 
at first by argument addressed to the intellect, nor by appeal to experience, but by the sheer 
strength of a love laid "on to the heart." It is, to begin with, a subjective thing. Is revelation, then, 
entirely a subjective assurance? Do the pardon and peace which it proclaims remain only 
feelings of the heart, without anything to correspond to them in real fact? By no means; for these 
Jews the revelation now whispered to their heart will actually take shape in providences of the 
most concrete kind. A voice will immediately call, "Prepare ye the way of the Lord," and the way 
will be prepared. Babylon will fall; Cyrus will let Israel go; their release will appear-most 
concrete of things!-in "black and white" on a Persian state-parchment. Yet, before these events 
happen and become part of His people’s experience, God desires first to convince His people by 
the sheer urgency of His love. Before He displays His Providence, He will speak in the power 
and evidence of His Grace. Afterwards, His prophets shall appeal to outward facts; we shall find 
them in succeeding chapters arguing both with Israel and the heathen on grounds of reason and 
the facts of history. But, in the meantime, let them only feel that in His Grace they have 
something for the heart of men, which, striking home, shall be its own evidence and force. 
Thus God adventures His Word forth by nameless and unaccredited men upon no other 
authority than the Grace, with which it is fraught for the heart of His people. The illustration, 
which this affords of the method and evidence of Divine revelation, is obvious. Let us, with all 
the strength of which we are capable, emphasise the fact that our prophecy-which is full of the 
materials for an elaborate theology, which contains the most detailed apologetic in the whole 
Bible, and displays the most glorious prospect of man’s service and destiny-takes its source and 
origin from a simple revelation of Grace and the subjective assurance of this in the heart of those 
to whom it is addressed. This proclamation of Grace is as characteristic and dominant in Second 
Isaiah as we saw the proclamation of conscience in Isa_1:1-31 to be characteristic of the First 
Isaiah. 
Before we pass on, let us look for a moment at the contents of this Grace, in the three clauses of 
the prophet’s cry: "Fulfilled is her warfare, absolved her guilt, received hath she of Jehovah’s 
hand double for all her sins." The very grammar here is eloquent of grace. The emphasis lies on 
the three predicates, which ought to stand in translation, as they do in the original, at the 
beginning of each clause. Prominence is given, not to the warfare, nor to the guilt, nor to the 
sins, but to this, that "accomplished" is the warfare, "absolved" the guilt, "sufficiently expiated" 
the sins. It is a great AT LAST which these clauses peal forth; but an At Last whose tone is not so 
much inevitableness as undeserved grace. The term translated warfare means "period of military 
service, appointed term of conscription"; and the application is apparent when we remember 
that the Exile had been fixed, by the Word of God through Jeremiah, to a definite number of 
years. "Absolved" is the passive of a verb meaning to "pay off what is due." (Lev_27:1-34) But 
the third clause is especially gracious. It declares that Israel has suffered of punishment more 

than double enough to atone for her sins. This is not a way of regarding either sin or atonement, 
which, theologically speaking, is accurate. What of its relation to our Articles, that man cannot 
give satisfaction for his sins by the work of his hands or the pains of his flesh? No: it would 
scarcely pass some of our creeds today. But all the more, that it thus bursts forth from strict 
terms of dealing, does it reveal the generosity of Him who utters it. How full of pity God is, to 
take so much account of the sufferings sinners have brought upon themselves! How full of grace 
to reckon those sufferings "double the sins" that had earned them! It is as when we have seem 
gracious men make us a free gift, and in their courtesy insist that we have worked for it. It is 
grace masked by grace. As the height of art is to conceal art, so the height of grace is to conceal 
grace, which it does in this verse. 
Such is the Voice of Grace. But, 
2. Hark, One calling! 
In the wilderness prepare the way of Jehovah! 
Make straight in the desert a highway for our God! 
Every valley shall be exalted, 
And every mountain and hill be made low: 
And the crooked grow straight, 
And rough places a plain: 
And the glory of Jehovah be revealed, 
And see it shall all flesh together; 
For the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken. 
The relation of this Voice to the previous one has already been indicated. This is the witness of 
Providence following upon the witness of Grace. Religion is a matter in the first place between 
God and the heart; but religion does not, as many mock, remain an inward feeling. The secret 
relation between God and His people issues into substantial fact, visible to all men. History 
vindicates faith; Providence executes Promise; Righteousness follows Grace. So, as the first 
Voice was spoken "to the heart," this second is for the hands and feet and active will. "Prepare ye 
the way of the Lord." If you, poor captives as you are, begin to act upon the grace whispered in 
your trembling hearts, the world will show the result. All things will come round to your side. A 
levelled empire, an altered world-across those your way shall lie clear to Jerusalem. You shall go 
forth in the sight of all men, and future generations looking back shall praise this manifest 
wonder of your God. "The glory of Jehovah shall be revealed, and see it shall all flesh together." 
On which words, how can our hearts help rising from the comfort of grace to the sense of 
mastery over this world, to the assurance of heaven itself? History must come round to the side 
of faith-as it has come round not in the case of Jewish exiles only, but wheresoever such a faith 
as theirs has been repeated. History must come round to the side of faith, if men will only obey 
the second as well as the first of these herald voices. But we are too ready to listen to the Word of 
the Lord, without seeking to prepare His way. We are satisfied with the personal comfort of our 
God; we are contented to be forgiven and-oh mockery!-left alone. But the word of God will not 
leave us alone, and not for comfort only is it spoken. On the back of the voice, which sets our 
heart right with God, comes the voice to set the world right, and no man is godly who has not 
heard both. Are we timid and afraid that facts will not correspond to our faith? Nay, but as God 
reigneth they shall, if only we put to our hands and make them; "all flesh shall see it," if we will 
but "prepare the way of the Lord." 

Have we only ancient proofs of this? On the contrary, God has done like wonders within the lives 
of those of us who are yet young. During our generation, a people has appealed from the 
convictions of her heart to the arbitrament of history, and appealed not in vain. When the 
citizens of the Northern States of the American Republic, not content as they might have been 
with their protests against slavery, rose to vindicate these by the sword, they faced, humanly 
speaking, a risk as great as that to which Jew was ever called by the word of God. Their own 
brethren were against them; the world stood aloof. But even so, unaided by united patriotism 
and as much dismayed as encouraged by the opinions of civilisation, they rose to the issue on 
the strength of conscience and their hearts. They rose and they conquered. Slavery was 
abolished. What had been but the conviction of a few men became the surprise, the admiration, 
the consent of the whole world. "The glory of the Lord was revealed, and all flesh saw it 
together." 
3. But the shadow of death falls on everything, even on the way of the Lord. By 550 B.C.-that is, 
after thirty-eight years of exile-nearly all the strong men of Israel’s days of independence must 
have been taken away. Death had been busy with the exiles for more than a generation. There 
was no longer any human representative of Jehovah to rally the people’s trust; the monarchy, 
each possible Messiah who in turn held it, the priesthood, and the prophethood-whose great 
personalities so often took the place of Israel’s official leaders-had all alike disappeared. It was 
little wonder, then, that a nation accustomed to be led, not by ideas like us Westerns, but by 
personages, who were to it the embodiment of Jehovah’s will and guidance, should have been 
cast into despair by the call, "Prepare ye the way of the Lord." What sort of a call was this for a 
people whose strong men were like things uprooted and withered! How could one be, with any 
heart, a herald of the Lord to such a people! 
Hark one saying "Call." 
And I said: 
"What can I call? 
All flesh is grass, 
And all its beauty like a wild-flower! 
Withers grass, fades flower, 
When the breath of Jehovah blows on it. 
Surely grass is the people." 
Back comes a voice like the east wind’s for pitilessness to the flowers, but of the east wind’s own 
strength and clearness, to proclaim Israel’s everlasting hope. 
Withers grass, fades flower, 
But the word of our God endureth for ever, 
Everything human may perish; the day may be past of the great prophets, of the priests-of the 
King in his beauty, who was vicegerent of God. But the people have God’s word; when all their 
leaders have fallen, and every visible authority for God is taken away, this shall be their rally and 
their confidence. 
All this is too like the actual experience of Israel in Exile not to be the true interpretation of this 
third, stern Voice. Their political and religious institutions, which had so often proved the 
initiative of a new movement, or served as a bridge to carry the nation across disaster to a larger 
future, were not in existence. Nor does any Moses, as in Egypt of old, rise to visibleness from 
among his obscure people, impose his authority upon them, marshal them, and lead them out 
behind him to freedom. But what we see is a scattered and a leaderless people, stirred in their 

shadow, as a ripe cornfield is stirred by the breeze before dawn-stirred in their shadow by the 
ancient promises of God, and everywhere breaking out at the touch of these into psalms and 
prophecies of hope. We see them expectant of redemption, we see them resolved to return, we 
see them carried across the desert to Zion, and from first to last it is the word of God that is their 
inspiration and assurance. 
They, who formerly had rallied round the Ark or the Temple, or who had risen to the hope of a 
glorious Messiah, do not now speak of all these, but their "hope," they tell us, "is in His word"; it 
is the instrument of their salvation, and their destiny is to be its evangelists. 
4. To this high destiny the fourth Voice now summons them, by a vivid figure 
Up on a high mountain, get thee up, 
Heraldess of good news, O Zion! 
Lift up with strength thy voice, 
Heraldess of good news, Jerusalem! 
Lift up, fear not, say to the cities of Judah:- 
Behold, your God. 
Behold, my Lord Jehovah, with power He cometh, 
And His arm rules for Him. 
Behold, His reward with Him, 
And His recompense before Him. 
As a shepherd His flock He shepherds; 
With His right arm gathers the lambs, 
And in His bosom bears them. 
Ewe-mothers He tenderly leads. 
The title which I have somewhat awkwardly translated "heraldess"-but in English there is really 
no better word for it-is the feminine participle of a verb meaning to "thrill," or "give joy, by 
means of good news." It is used generally to tell such happy news as the birth of a child, but 
mostly in the special sense of carrying tidings of victory or peace home from the field to the 
people. The feminine participle would seem from Psa_68:1-35 "the women who publish victory 
to the great host," to have been the usual term for the members of those female choirs, who, like 
Miriam and her maidens, celebrated a triumph in face of the army, or came forth from the city 
to hail the returning conqueror, as the daughters of Jerusalem hailed Saul and David. As such a 
chorister, Zion is now summoned to proclaim Jehovah’s arrival at the gates of the cities of 
Judah. 
The verses from "Behold, your God," to the end of the Prologue are the song of the heraldess. Do 
not their mingled martial and pastoral strains exactly suit the case of the Return? For this is an 
expedition, on which the nation’s champion has gone forth, not to lead His enemies captives to 
His gates, but that He may gather His people home. Not mailed men, in the pride of a victory 
they have helped to win, march in behind Him.-"armour and tumult and the garment rolled in 
blood,"-but a herd of mixed and feeble folk, with babes and women, in need of carriage and 
gentle leading, wander wearily back. And, therefore, in the mouth of the heraldess the figure 
changes from a warrior-king to the Good Shepherd. "With His right arm He gathers the lambs, 
and in His bosom bears them. Ewe-mothers He gently leads." How true a picture, and how 
much it recalls! Fifty years before, the exiles left their home (as we can see to this day upon 

Assyrian sculptures) in closely-driven companies, fettered, and with the urgency upon them of 
grim soldiers, who marched at intervals in their ranks to keep up the pace, and who tossed the 
weaklings impatiently aside. But now, see the slow and loosely-gathered bands wander back, 
just as quickly as the weakest feel strength to travel, and without any force or any guidance save 
that of their Almighty, Unseen Shepherd. 
We are now able to appreciate the dramatic unity of this Prologue. How perfectly it gathers into 
its four Voices the whole course of Israel’s redemption: the first assurance of Grace whispered to 
the heart, cooperation with Providence, confidence in God’s bare Word, the full Return, and the 
Restoration of the City. 
But its climax is undoubtedly the honour it lays upon the whole people to be publishers of the 
good news of God. Of this it speaks with trumpet tones. All Jerusalem must be a herald-people. 
And how could Israel help owning the constraint and inspiration to so high an office, after so 
heartfelt an experience of grace, so evident a redemption, so glorious a proof of the power of the 
Word of God? To have the heart thus filled with grace, to have the will enlisted in so Divine a 
work, to have known the almightiness of the Divine Word when everything else failed-after such 
an experience, who would not be able to preach the good news of God, to foretell, as our prophet 
bids Israel foretell, the coming of the Kingdom and Presence of God-the day when the Lord’s 
flock shall be perfect and none wanting, when society, though still weary and weak and mortal, 
shall have no stragglers nor outcasts nor reprobates. 
O God, so fill us with Thy grace and enlist us in Thy work, so manifest the might of Thy word
to us, that the ideal of Thy perfect kingdom may shine as bright and near to us as to Thy
prophet of old, and that we may become its inspired preachers and ever labour in its hope.
Amen.
 
 
11. SBC, “I. In our text there is a specification of one large class of medicine for spiritual disease; 
and therefore, by inference, one large class of sickness. "Comfort" is the staple of the 
prescription, and what was the condition of the patients? "Cry unto her, that her warfare is 
accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned, for she hath received of the Lord’s hands double for 
all her sins." Here evidently the condition of Jerusalem is one of distress, anxiety, and 
distraction, and this accords most exactly with a passage of the Psalms: "In the multitude of my 
thoughts within me, Thy comforts delight my soul." We conclude that the case of sickness so 
emphatically prescribed for in our text is that under which the righteous may be labouring from 
the difficulties which may encompass him. Our text contains a prescription, but not a 
prescription which will serve in all cases wherever there is a throng of anxious thoughts, but only 
in cases in which the party strives to walk according to the precepts of religion, and may 
therefore be classed among the people of God. 
II. Consider the faithfulness and efficacy of the medicine prescribed. The case is that of a 
righteous man, on whom cares and sorrows press with great weight, and whose mind is torn 
with anxieties, and thronged by a crowd of restless intruders, distracting him even in his 
communings with God. Now the very disease under which this man labours incapacitates him in 
a great measure for any process of argument. The comforts of God are the rich assurances of His 
forgiving and accepting love; the gracious declarations of His everlasting purpose of preserving 
to the end those whom He has chosen in Christ; the multiplied promises of spiritual guidance, 
protection, and victory, which make to the eye of faith the page of Scripture one sheet of burning 
brightness, always presenting most radiantly what is most suited to the necessity. There are the 
foretastes of immortality, the glimpses of things within the veil, the communications of the 
Spirit, the anticipations of glory, which if the cold and the worldly resolve into a dream of 

enthusiasm, the faithful know by experience belong to the realities of their portion. Here then 
are comforts, and it is the part of the righteous man in his season of anxiety and distraction to 
confine himself to these comforts, regarding them as a sick man the cordials which are specially 
adapted to his state. 
III. We make no far-fetched application of the text, if we affirm it as specially appropriate on the 
approach of the last enemy, death. What has the believer to do when conscious that the time of 
his departure is at hand, but seize the consolations of Christianity, and give himself meekly over 
into the Good Shepherd’s hands? Let him not argue; let him not debate; let him not sit in 
judgment,—let him simply have recourse to the comforts of God. 
H. Melvill, Penny Pulpit, No. 1712 
 
 
 
I. With these words Isaiah opens his gospel; God’s good word to man. The earlier chapters are 
burdens; in view of the sins and wrongs around him, he lifts up his voice and denounces doom. 
But mercy rejoices against judgment, so he breaks forth before the burden is ended into the 
most sublime strains of consolation and hope which God’s prophets have ever been 
commissioned to utter to the world. "O Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself, but I am thy Saviour," 
is the real text of his prophecy. It is the theme of his poem wrought out with consummate art 
through a hundred suggestive variations. A people self-destroyed, God-redeemed, is the thought 
which meets us everywhere; and it is this which makes these closing chapters the great evangelic 
poems, not of Israel only, but of the world. 
II. The words of this passage (1-11) look on to the captivity. The people, afflicted, chastened, 
broken in spirit, are called upon to listen to the strains of consolation which God has breathed 
for them in His Word. These words look on through all the ages of human history. It is comfort 
throughout and comfort to the end. The mercy of judgment is a subject which we too little study. 
Yet mercy is the deepest element in every judgment with which God afflicts mankind. Great 
epidemics are healing ordinances. They purify the vital springs. They leave a purer, stronger 
health when their dread shadow has passed by. Catastrophes in history are like thunder-storms; 
they leave a fresher, brighter atmosphere. Reigns of terror are the gates through which man 
passes out into a wider world. 
III. Isaiah had the profoundest right to speak of comfort, because he could speak of the advent of 
the Redeemer to the world. He not only preaches comfort, but discloses the source from which it 
springs. 
J. Baldwin Brown, The Sunday Afternoon, p. 1. 
 
 
 
I. In the first place, let us identify the people spoken of. "Comfort ye, comfort ye My people." 
There was a first reference to the people of the Jews, who we know all through were a people 
that shadowed forth other people. The people spoken of in these words who are to be comforted 
are preeminently the people of God. They are those who have Christ for their righteousness, and 
the Spirit for their strength, grace for their life, God for their Father, heaven for their home. 
II. Notice next those messengers through whom this comfort is to be given. There seems to have 
been no plurality at first, for this is the writing of the prophet Isaiah; but as it was written it was 
not done with, and as the secretary of the Holy Spirit entered the minute in this book the All-
wise Spirit said, "I shall want it for the future; for Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, and Paul,—

for all My servants through all ages. I shall be saying through all time through them, ’Comfort 
ye, comfort ye My people." 
III. Consider the comfort we are to convey. "Comfort ye My people." (1) By reminding them that 
I am their God. All this chapter is a remembrance that God is the Father of His people. (2) By 
reminding them that their captivity in this world is nearly over, and that they will soon be home. 
There is a glorious world beyond this. We know that there is such a world. Let us cherish the 
thought, and push through the difficulties of this world. We shall not see it until we reach the 
throne of glory, and see God as He is. (3) The Saviour is coming to this world, and is on His way 
to show His glory here. Comfort the people who feel amazed and disquieted by the sight of the 
strong things that are arrayed against Christ. Tell them that Christ will overcome these things. 
He will come and fill the world with His victories. 
C. Stanford, Contemporary Pulpit, vol. v., p. 9. 
 
 
 
2 Speak tenderly to Jerusalem, 
    and proclaim to her 
that her hard service has been completed, 
    that her sin has been paid for, 
that she has received from the Lord’s hand 
    double for all her sins. 
 
1.BARNES, “Speak ye comfortably - Hebrew, 
בל־לע  ‛al-leb as in the margin, ‘To the heart.’ 
The heart is the seat of the affections. It is there that sorrow and joy are felt. We are oppressed 
there with grief, and we speak familiarly of being pained at the heart and of being of a glad or 
merry heart. To speak ‘to the heart,’ is to speak in such a way as to remove the troubles of the 
heart; to furnish consolation, and joy. It means that they were not merely to urge such topics as 
should convince the understanding, but such also as should be adopted to minister consolation 
to the heart. So the word is used in Gen_34:3 : ‘And his soul clave unto Dinah - and he loved the 
damsel, and spake kindly (Hebrew, to the heart) of the damsel;’ Gen_50:21 : ‘And he comforted 
them, and spoke kindly unto them’ (Hebrew, to their hearts); see also 2Ch_32:6. 
To Jerusalem - The direction is not merely to speak to the people in Babylon, but also to 
comfort Jerusalem itself lying in ruins. The general direction is, therefore, that the entire series 

of topics of consolation should be adduced - the people were to return from their bondage, and 
Jerusalem was to be rebuilt, and the worship of God to be restored. 
And cry unto her - In the manner of a crier; or one making public and loud proclamation 
(compare Isa_40:3, Isa_40:9). Jerusalem is here personified. She is addressed as in ruins, and 
as about to be rebuilt, and as capable of consolation from this promise. 
That her warfare is accomplished - Septuagint, ‘That her humiliation (ταπείνωσις  tapeino
sis
) is accomplished.’ The Hebrew word (
אבצ  SH tv t), ‘warfare’) properly means an army or host 
(compare the note at Isa_1:9), and is usually applied to an army going forth to war, or 
marshalled for battle 2Sa_8:16; 2Sa_10:7. It is then used to denote an appointed time of service; 
the discharge of a duty similar to an enlistment, and is applied to the services of the Levites in 
the tabernacle Num_4:28 : ‘All that enter in to perform the service (Hebrew, to war the 
warfare), to do the work in the tabernacle of the congregation.’ Compare Num_8:24-25. Hence, 
it is applied to human life contemplated as a warfare, or enlistment, involving hard service and 
calamity; an enlistment from which there is to be a discharge by death. 
Is there not a set time (Hebrew, a warfare) to man upon earth? 
Are not his days as the days of an hireling? 
Job_7:1
But if a man die - shall he indeed live again? 
All the days of my appointed time (Hebrew, my warfare) will I wait, 
Till my change come. 
Job_14:14
Compare Dan_10:1. The word then means hard service, such as soldiers endure; an appointed 
time which they are to serve; an enlistment involving hardships, toil, privation, danger, 
calamity. In this sense it is applied hero to Jerusalem - to the trials, calamities, desolations to 
which she was subjected for her sins, and which were to endure a definite and fixed time - like 
the enlistment of an army. That time was now coming to an end, and to be succeeded by a 
release, or discharge. Vitringa, who supposes that this refers primarily and solely to the times of 
the Messiah, regards this as meaning that the definite time of the legal economy, a time of toil, 
and of vexatious and troublesome ceremonies, was about to end by the coming of the Messiah. 
But the more correct interpretation is, probably, that which supposes that there was a primary 
reference to the long and painful captivity of the Jews, in Babylon. 
That her iniquity - The iniquity or sin here referred to, is that long series of acts of 
rebellion, corruption, and idolatry, with which the Jewish people had been chargeable, and 
which had rendered their captivity necessary. As a nation, that sin was now expiated, or 
removed by their protracted punishment in Babylon. It was a sufficient expression of the divine 
displeasure at the national offences, and God was satisfied (הצרנ  nı;r
e
SH tx) with it, and could 
consistently restore them to their land, and to their former privileges. The whole language here 
has respect to national, and not to individual offences. 
Is pardoned - Vulgate, Dimissa est iniquitas illius. Septuagint, Λέλυται3α4τ5ς36378αρτία  
Lelutai autes he hamartia - ‘Her sin is loosed,’ dissolved, remitted. The word ‘pardon’ does not 
quite express the meaning of the word in the original (הצרנ  nı;r
e
SH tx). The word הצר  _ tSH tx 
properly means to delight in any person or thing; to take pleasure in; then to receive graciously 
or favorably; to delight in sacrifices and offerings Job_33:26; Psa_51:18; Eze_20:40; and, in the 
Hiphil conjugation, satisfy, or pay to off, that is, to cause to be satisfied, or pleased; and then in 
Hophal, to be satisfied, to be paid off, to be pleased or satisfied with an expiation, or with an 

atonement for sins, so as to delight in the person who makes it. Here it means not strictly to 
pardon, but it means that they had endured the national punishment which God saw to be 
necessary; they had served out the long and painful enlistment which he had appointed, and 
now he was satisfied, and took delight in restoring them to their own land. It does not refer to 
the pardon of people in consequence of the atonement made by the Lord Jesus; but it may be 
used as an illustration of that, when God is satisfied with that atonement; and when he has 
pleasure or delight in setting the soul free from the bondage of sin, and admitting the sinner to 
his favor - as he had delight here in restoring his people to their own land. 
For she hath received - Jerusalem had now been desolate for almost seventy years, on the 
supposition that this relates to the period near the close of the exile, and that was regarded as an 
ample or full expression of what she ought to suffer for her national offences. 
Of the Lord’s hand - From the hand, or by the agency of Yahweh. Whoever were the 
instruments, her sufferings were to be regarded as his appointment. 
Double for all her sins - The word rendered ‘double’ (םילפכ  kip
e
layim) is the dual form 
from לפכ  kepel, ‘a doubling,’ and occurs in Job_41:13 : 
Who will rip up the covering of his armor? 
Against the doubling of his nostrils who will advance? 
Good
And in Job_11:6 : 
And that he would unfold to them the secrets of wisdom. 
That they are double to that which is; 
That is, there are double-folds to God’s wisdom, or the wisdom of of God is complicated, 
inexplicabIe (Gesenius). The word in Job means ‘conduplications, folds, complications, mazes, 
intricacies’ (Good). Here the word has doubtless its usual and proper meaning, and denotes 
double, twice as much; and the expression may denote that God had inflicted on them double 
that which had been usually inflicted on rebellious nations, or on the nation, before for its sins. 
Or the word may be used to denote abundance, and the prophet may design to teach that they 
had been amply, or abundantly punished for their crimes. ‘That is,’ says Grotius, ‘as much as 
God judged to be sufficient.’ ‘Double, here,’ says Calvin, ‘is to be received for large and 
abundant.’ Some have supposed (see Rosenmuller, who approves of this interpretation) that the 
word ‘sins here means the punishment of sins, and that the word ‘double’ refers to the mercies 
or favors which they were about to receive, or which God had purposed to confer on them. So 
Lowth understands it; and renders the word החקל  . t"
e
ex tx ‘shall receive’ (in the future): 
That she shall receive at the hand of Yahweh 
(Blessings) double to the punishment of all her sins. 
But though it was true that their favors on their return, in the hope of the Messiah, and in 
their renovated privileges, would be far more numerous than their sufferings had been, yet this 
does not so well suit the connection, where the prophet is giving a reason why they should be 
released from their bondage, and restored to the privileges of their own land. That reason 
manifestly is, that they had suffered what was regarded by Yahweh as an ample expression of his 
displeasure for their national offences. It does not refer to individual sinners; nor to any power 
which they have to make atonement for their sins; nor does it refer to the atonement made by 
the Messiah. But it may be remarked, by the way, that in the sufferings of the Redeemer there 
has been ample satisfaction for the sins of his people. The Chaldee interpreter understands this 

as Rosenmuller does, that the word ‘double’ refers to, the mercies which they had received: 
‘Because she has received a cup of consolation from the presence of the Lord, as if (וּלאכ  k
e
)O.ut) 
she had been smitten twofold for all her sins.’ 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
Double for all her sins “Blessings double to the punishment” - It 
does not seem reconcilable to our notions of the Divine justice, which always punishes less than 
our iniquities deserve, to suppose that God had punished the sins of the Jews in double 
proportion; and it is more agreeable to the tenor of this consolatory message to understand it as 
a promise of ample recompense for the effects of past displeasure, on the reconciliation of God 
to his returning people. To express this sense of the passage, which the words of the original will 
very well bear, it was necessary to add a word or two in the version to supply the elliptical 
expression of the Hebrew. Compare 
Isa_61:7; Job_42:10; Zec_9:12. האטח  chattaah signifies 
punishment for sin, Lam_3:39; Zec_14:19. But Kimchi says, “Double here means the two 
captivities and emigrations suffered by the Israelites. The first, the Babylonish captivity; the 
second, that which they now endure.” This is not a bad conjecture. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Speak ye comfortably to Jerusalem, and cry unto her,.... Or, "speak to or 
according to the heart of Jerusalem 
(h)"; to her very heart, what will be a cordial to her, very 
acceptable, grateful, and comfortable; and let it be proclaimed aloud, that she may hear and 
understand it. By "Jerusalem" is meant the Gospel church, and the true members of it. Aben 
Ezra interprets it of the congregation of Israel; see Heb_12:22,  
 
that her warfare is accomplished; this life is a warfare; saints have many enemies to engage 
with, sin, Satan, and the world; many battles to fight, a great fight of afflictions, and the good 
fight of faith: this is "accomplished", or "filled up (i)"; not that it is at an end before this life is, 
while that lasts there will be a continual conflict; yet all enemies are now conquered by Christ, 
and in a short time will be under the feet of his people; the Captain of their salvation, who has 
got the victory, is gone before them; the crown is laid up for them, and is sure unto them. Some 
interpret it, as Aben Ezra, Kimchi, and Ben Melech, "her set or appointed time (k)"; and 
compare it with Job_7:1, and may be understood either of the time of deliverance from captivity: 
so the Targum,  
 
"that her captivity by the people is filled up:''  
 
or of the time of the Messiah's coming, the fulness of time, when he should appear, afterwards 
prophesied of; or of the servitude and bondage of the law being at an end, and of all the fatigue, 
labour, and trouble of that dispensation; and of the Gospel dispensation taking place: it follows,  
 
that her iniquity is pardoned; which is God's act, flows from his free grace, is obtained by 
the blood of Christ, is full and complete, and yields great relief and comfort to guilty minds: or 
"is accepted" (l); that is, the punishment of it as bore by her surety; see Lev_26:43. The allusion 
is to the sacrifices being accepted for the atonement of sin, Lev_1:4, and may have respect here 
to the acceptation of Christ's sacrifice, for the expiation of the sins of his people. Jarchi 
interprets the word "appeased"; and so it may be applied to the reconciliation for sin made by 
the blood of Christ. The Targum understands it of forgiveness, as we do:  

 
for she hath received of the Lord's hand double for all her sins; which may be 
understood either of a sufficiency of chastisements for sin; though they are not more, but less, 
than are deserved, yet are as much as their heavenly Father, in his great tenderness and 
compassion, thinks are enough; and though they are in measure, and do not exceed, yet are in 
large measure often, at least in their own apprehension: or else of the large and copious 
blessings of grace and goodness received, instead of punishment for sins, that might be 
expected: or rather at the complete satisfaction made by Christ for her sins, and of her receiving 
at the Lord's hands, in her surety, full punishment for them; not that more was required than 
was due, but that ample satisfaction was made, and, being infinite, fully answers the demerit of 
sin; and this being in the room and stead of God's people, clears them, and yields comfort to 
them.
 
4. HENRY, “
Comfortable words directed to Jerusalem in particular: “Speak to the heart of
Jerusalem (
Isa_40:2); speak that which will revive her heart, and be a cordial to her and to all 
that belong to her and wish her well. Do not whisper it, but cry unto her: cry aloud, to show 
saints their comforts as well as to show sinners their transgressions; make her hear it:” 1. “That 
the days of her trouble are numbered and finished: Her warfare is accomplished, the set time of 
her servitude; the campaign is now at an end, and she shall retire into quarters of refreshment.” 
Human life is a warfare (Job_7:1); the Christian life much more. But the struggle will not last 
always; the warfare will be accomplished, and then the good soldiers shall not only enter into 
rest, but be sure of their pay. 2. “That the cause of her trouble is removed, and, when that is 
taken away, the effect will cease. Tell her that her iniquity is pardoned, God is reconciled to her, 
and she shall no longer be treated as one guilty before him.” Nothing can be spoken more 
comfortably than this, Son, be of good cheer; thy sins be forgiven thee. Troubles are then 
removed in love when sin is pardoned. 3. “That the end of her trouble is answered: She has
received of the Lord double for the cure of all her sins, sufficient, and more than sufficient, to 
separate between her and her idols,” the worship of which was the great sin for which God had a 
controversy with them, and from which he designed to reclaim them by their captivity in 
Babylon: and it had that effect upon them; it begat in them a rooted antipathy to idolatry, and 
was physic doubly strong for the purging out of that iniquity. Or it may be taken as the language 
of the divine compassion: His soul was grieved for the misery of Israel (Jdg_10:16), and, like a 
tender father, since he spoke against them he earnestly remembered them (Jer_31:20), and was 
ready to say that he had given them too much correction. They, being very penitent, 
acknowledged that God has punished them less than their iniquities deserved; but he, being 
very pitiful, owned, in a manner, that he had punished them more than they deserved. True 
penitents have indeed, in Christ and his sufferings, received of the Lord's hand double for all
their sins; for the satisfaction Christ made by his death was of such an infinite value that it was 
more than double to the demerits of sin; for God spared not his own Son. 
 
5. JAMISON, “
comfortably — literally, “to the heart”; not merely to the intellect. 
Jerusalem — Jerusalem though then in ruins, regarded by God as about to be rebuilt; her 
people are chiefly meant, but the city is personified. 
cry — publicly and emphatically as a herald cries aloud (
Isa_40:3). 
warfare — or, the appointed time of her misery (Job_7:1, Margin; Job_14:14; Dan_10:1). 
The ulterior and Messianic reference probably is the definite time when the legal economy of 
burdensome rites is at an end (Gal_4:3, Gal_4:4). 

pardoned — The Hebrew expresses that her iniquity is so expiated that God now delights in 
restoring her. 
double for all her sins — This can only, in a very restricted sense, hold good of Judah’s 
restoration after the first captivity. For how can it be said her “warfare was accomplished,” when 
as yet the galling yoke of Antiochus and also of Rome was before them? The “double for her 
sins” must refer to the twofold captivity, the Assyrian and the Roman; at the coming close of this 
latter dispersion, and then only, can her “iniquity” be said to be “pardoned,” or fully expiated 
[Houbigant]. It does not mean double as much as she deserved, but ample punishment in her 
twofold captivity. Messiah is the antitypical Israel (compare Mat_2:15, with Hos_11:1). He 
indeed has “received” of sufferings amply more than enough to expiate “for our sins” 
(Rom_5:15, Rom_5:17). Otherwise (cry unto her) “that she shall receive (blessings) of the Lord’s 
hand double to the punishment of all her sins” (so “sin” is used, Zec_14:19, Margin) [Lowth]. 
The English Version is simpler. 
 
 
6. K&D, “
The summons is now repeated with still greater emphasis, the substance of the 
consoling proclamation being also given. “Speak ye to the heart of Jerusalem, and cry unto her,
that her affliction is ended, that her debt is paid, that she has received from the hand of
Jehovah double for all her sins.” The holy city is thought of here in connection with the 
population belonging to it. 
ב ֵל־ל ַע ר ֶE ִG (to speak to the heart) is an expression applied in Gen_34:3 
and Jdg_19:3 to words adapted to win the heart; in Gen_50:21, to the words used by Joseph to 
inspire his brethren with confidence; whilst here it is used in precisely the same sense as in 
Hos_2:16, and possibly not without a reminiscence of this earlier prophecy. ל ֶא א ָר ָק (to call to a 
person) is applied to a prophetic announcement made to a person, as in Jer_7:27; Zec_1:4. The 
announcement to be made to Jerusalem is then introduced with י ִI, Jτι, which serves as the 
introduction to either an indirect or a direct address (Ges. §155, 1, e). (1.) Her affliction has 
become full, and therefore has come to an end. א ָב ָצ, military service, then feudal service, and 
hardship generally (Job_7:1); here it applies to the captivity or exile - that unsheltered bivouac, 
as it were, of the people who had bee transported into a foreign land, and were living there in 
bondage, restlessness, and insecurity. (2.) Her iniquity is atoned for, and the justice of God is 
satisfied: 
sO_SH tx, which generally denotes a satisfactory reception, is used here in the sense of 
meeting with a satisfactory payment, like 
ןוֹ ָע 3ָהצ ָר in Lev_26:41, Lev_26:43, to pay off the debt of 
sin by enduring the punishment of sin. (3.) The third clause repeats the substance of the 
previous ones with greater emphasis and in a fuller tone: Jerusalem has already suffered fully 
for her sins. In direct opposition to ה ָח ְק ָל, which cannot, when connected with two actual perfects 
as it is here, be take as a perfect used to indicate the certainty of some future occurrence, 
Gesenius, Hitzig, Ewald, Umbreit, Stier, and Hahn suppose 
kiphlayim to refer to the double 
favour that Jerusalem was about to receive (like 
mishneh in 
Isa_61:7, and possibly borrowed 
from Isaiah in Zec_9:12), instead of to the double punishment which Jerusalem had endured 
(like mishneh in Jer_16:18). It is not to be taken, however, in a judicial sense; in which case God 
would appear over-rigid, and therefore unjust. Jerusalem had not suffered more than its sins 
had deserved; but the compassion of God regarded what His justice had been obliged to inflict 
upon Jerusalem as superabundant. This compassion also expresses itself in the words “for all” 
(
b
e
khol, c. Beth pretii): there is nothing left for further punishment. The turning-point from 

wrath to love has arrived. The wrath has gone forth in double measure. With what intensity, 
therefore, will the love break forth, which has been so long restrained! 
 
 7. CALVIN, “2.Speak ye according to the heart of Jerusalem. Here God commands his servants the
prophets, and lays down the message which he wishes them to deliver publicly, when believers shall be
called to change their strain from mourning to joy. And yet he does not exhort and encourage them to the
cheerful and courageous discharge of their office, so much as he conveys to the minds of believers an
assured hope that they may patiently endure the irksomeness of delay, till the prophets appear with this
glad and delightful message. To speak to the heart  (107) is nothing else than “ speak according to the
wish or sentiment of the mind;” for our heart abhors or recoils if any sad intelligence is communicated, but
eagerly receives, or rather runs to meet, whatever is agreeable. Now, in consequence of the people
having been apparently rejected, nothing could be more agreeable than a reconciliation (108) which
should blot out all offenses. By a figure of speech in which a part is taken for the whole, Jerusalem, as is
well known, denotes the Church.

And cry to her. The word cry means that the promise of this grace will be open and manifest, so as to
resound in the ears of all and be understood; for if prophets only muttered or spoke indistinctly, the belief
of this consolation would be doubtful or weak, but now that they publish it boldly and with open mouth, all
doubts are removed.

That her warfare is accomplished. This is the desirable message, that the Lord determines to put an end
to the warfare of his people. I consider יכ (ki) to be used for introducing an explanation. Some think
that האבצ, (tzebaahh,) which we have translated “ warfare,” simply denotes “” as if it had been said, “ time
is accomplished.” (109) Others think that it expresses the time of visitation, but this is incorrect; for among
the Hebrews it literally denotes a time previously appointed and set apart for lawful work or labor.
(Num_4:23.) But here unquestionably the metaphor is taken from the discharge of soldiers; for it means
that the end and issue of their vexations is at hand, and that God does not wish to harass his people
continually, but to set a limit to their afflictions. He therefore compares the time of the captivity in Babylon
to a righteous warfare, at the end of which the soldiers, having obtained an honorable discharge, will
return home to enjoy peace and quietness.

That her iniquity is pardoned. This means that God is so gracious to them that he is unwilling to treat
them with the utmost severity. These words, therefore, assign a reason; for, as physicians, in curing
diseases, first remove the causes from which diseases arise, so does the Lord deal with us. The
scourges by which he chastises us proceed from our sins; and therefore, that he may cease to strike, he
must first pardon us; and consequently, he says that there will be an end of punishments, because he no
longer imputes sin. Others think that הנוע (gnavonahh) means “ misery,” and that it denotes that her
misery is ended. This meaning also is highly appropriate, and thus the Prophet will make the same
announcement in two ways; for to finish her warfare, and to put an end to her miseries, mean the same
thing. Yet we must hold this principle, that God ceases from inflicting punishment when he is appeased,
so that pardon and the forgiveness of sins always come first in order, as the cause. But the
word הצרנ (nirtzah) demands, in my opinion, the former meaning; as if he had said, that God has been
appeased in such a manner that, having pardoned and forgiven their sins, he is ready to enter again into
a state of favor with his people.

Double for all her sins. This passage is explained in two ways. Some say that the people, having

deserved a double punishment, have obtained a double favor; and others, that they have received
enough of punishment, because God is unwilling to exact more. The former interpretation, though it
contains an excellent and profitable doctrine, does not agree with the text, and must therefore be set
aside; and it is evident that the Prophet means nothing else than that God is abundantly satisfied with the
miseries which have befallen his Church. I could have wished, therefore, that they who have attacked
Jerome and other supporters of this interpretation, had been more moderate; for the natural meaning
belongs to this interpretation, and not to the more ingenious one, that the Lord repays double favor for
their sins. The general meaning is, that God is unwilling to inflict more severe or more lengthened
punishment on his people, because, through his fatherly kindness, he is in some sense displeased with
the severity.

Here the word double denotes “ and abundant.” It must not be imagined that the punishments were
greater than the offenses, or equal to them; for we ought to abhor the blasphemy of those who accuse
God of cruelty, as if he inflicted on men excessively severe punishment; for what punishment could be
inflicted that was sufficiently severe even for the smallest offense? This must therefore relate to the mercy
of God, who, by setting a limit to the chastisements, testifies that he is unwilling to punish them any more
or longer, as if he were abundantly satisfied with what had gone before, though that nation deserved far
severer chastisements. God sustains the character of a Father who, while he compassionates his
children, is led, not without reluctance, to exercise severity, and thus willingly bends his mind to grant
forgiveness.



(107) “Selon le coeur;” “ to the heart.” Our author employs both “secundum cor “ and “ad cor.” — Ed. 

(108) “La reconciliation avec Dieu.” “ reconciliation with God.”

(109) Que nons avons traduit Guerre, pour “ temps,” comme s’ estoit dit Son temps est accompli.  
 
8. BI, “
Voices that speak to the heart 
This is one characteristic of the voices that reach us from God: they speak home to the heart (R.., 
marg.). The phrase in the Hebrew is the ordinary expression for wooing, and describes the 
attitude of the suppliant lover endeavouring to woo a maiden’s heart. Love can detect love. 
I. THE VOICE OF FORGIVENESS. The first need of the soul is forgiveness. It can endure 
suffering; and if that suffering, like the Jewish exile, has been caused by its own follies and sins, 
it will meekly bow beneath it, saying with Eli, under similar circumstances, “It is the Lord; let 
Him do what seemeth good to Him.” But the sense of being unforgiven! This bitterness of heart 
for sin is the first symptom of returning life! And before God can enter upon His great work of 
salvation, before He can clear away the debris and restore the ruined temple, before He can 
reproduce His image, it is needful to assure the penitent and believing soul that its time of 
service is accomplished, that its iniquity is pardoned. In dealing with the question of sin and its 
results, let us always distinguish between its penal and natural consequences. The distinction 
comes out clearly in the ease of drunkenness or criminal violence. Society steps in and inflicts 
the penalties of the fine, the prison, or the lash; but in addition to these, there is the aching 
head, the trembling hand, the shattered nervous system. So in respect to all sin. The natural 
consequences remain. David was forgiven, but the sword never left his house. The drunkard, the 
dissolute, the passionate, may be pardoned, and yet have to reap as they sowed. The 

consequences of forgiven sin may be greatly sanctified; the Marah waters cured by the tree of the 
Cross—yet they must be patiently and inevitably endured. It was thus that Jerusalem was 
suffering, when these dulcet notes reached her. The backsliding and rebellious people were 
doomed to serve their appointed time and captivity, and suffer the natural and inevitable results 
of apostasy. Hence the double comfort of this first announcement. 
II. THE VOICE OF DELIVERANCE. Between Babylon and Palestine lay a great desert of more 
than thirty days’ journey. But the natural difficulties that seemed to make the idea of return 
chimerical, were small compared with those that arose from other circumstances. The captives 
were held by as proud a monarchy as that which refused to let their fathers go from the brick-
kilns of Egypt. Mountains arose in ranges between them and freedom, and valleys interposed 
their yawning gulfs. But when God arises to deliver His people who cry day and night unto Him, 
mountains swing back, as did the iron gate before Peter; valleys lift their hollows into level 
plains; crooked things become straight, and rough places smooth. 
III. THE VOICES OF DECAY AND IMMORTAL STRENGTH. As man’s  soul is still, and 
becomes able to distinguish the voices that speak around him in that eternal world to which he, 
not less than the unseen speakers, belongs, it hears first and oftenest the lament of the angels 
over the transcience of human life and glory. In a stillness, in which the taking of the breath is 
hushed, the soul listens to their conversation as they speak together. “Cry,” says one watcher to 
another. “What shall I cry?” is the instant inquiry. There is, continues the first, “but one 
sentiment suggested by the aspect of the world of men. All flesh is grass, and all its beauty like 
the wild flowers of the meadow-lands, blasted by the breath of the east wind, or lying in swathes 
beneath the reaper’s scythe.” The words meet with a deep response in the heart of each 
thoughtful man. But listen further to the voices of the heavenly watchers. The failure of man 
shall not frustrate the Divine purpose. “The Word of the Lord shall stand for ever.” 
IV. VOICES TO HERALD THE SHEPHERD-KING. The Old Version  and the margin of the R.V. 
are, perhaps, preferable to the R.V. Zion, the grey fortress of Jerusalem, is bidden to climb the 
highest mountain within reach, and to lift up her voice in fearless strength, announcing to the 
cities of Judah lying around in ruins that God was on His way to restore them. “Say unto the 
cities, Behold your God! Behold the Lord God will come.” All eyes are turned to behold the 
entrance on the scene of the Lord God, especially as it has been announced that He will come as 
a mighty one. But, lo! a Shepherd conducts His flock with leisurely steps across the desert sands, 
gathering the lambs with His arm, and carrying them in His bosom, and gently leading those 
that give suck. It is as when, in after centuries, the beloved apostle was taught to expect the Lion 
of the tribe of Judah, and, lo! in the midst of the throne stood a Lamb as it had been slain. Do 
not be afraid of God. He has a shepherd’s heart and skill. (F. B. Meyer, B. A.) 
 
 
God the Comforter of His people 
The skill of a physician is shown, in the first place, in selecting out of many diseases that under 
which his patient suffers; and, in the second place, in choosing, out of many remedies, that 
which is most likely to effect his cure. There is as great variety in the diseases of the soul as in 
those of the body. And if there be this variety in spiritual diseases, and this variety of remedy, 
then evidently, in ministering to a mixed people, the preacher of Christianity will have to decide 
in each separate case what is the precise form of sickness, and what the exact medicine best 
adapted to its cure. Where the soul is utterly insensible to the truths of religion, there must not 
be the same process as where the conscience is busy in remonstrance. There are spiritual 
patients with whom we must try argument; but there are others with whom argument would be 
altogether out of place, whose disquieted minds totally incapacitate them for any process of 
reasoning; who require the cordials of the Gospel, that they may be strengthened for the trials 

and endurances of life. There is the lowering medicine for the over-sanguine and presumptuous; 
and there is the stimulating for the timid and mistrustful. 
I. In our text, there is a specification of one large class of medicine; and therefore, by inference, 
ONE LARGE CLASS OF SICKNESS. “Comfort” is the staple of the prescription. And what was 
the condition of these patients? We may ascertain this from the subsequent words, “Cry unto 
her, that her warfare is accomplished, that her iniquity is pardoned: for she hath received of the 
Lord’s hands double for all her sins.” Here evidently the condition of Jerusalem is one of distress 
and anxiety and distraction; and this accords most exactly with a passage in the Psalms, and 
with which we shall connect our text—“In the multitude of my thoughts within me, Thy comforts 
delight my soul.” Here there is the same medicine—“comfort”; but you have the disease more 
clearly defined—a “multitude of thoughts.” Bishop Austin’s version is, “The multitude of my 
anxieties within me”; whilst the representation in the original Hebrew would seem that of a man 
involved in a labyrinth, from whose intricacies there was no way of escape. All this agrees 
precisely with the case of Jerusalem in the text. And what cause of distressing anxiety would 
there be whilst there was warfare unfinished, and sin unforgiven! A multitude of thoughts is a 
very common symptom; but in different patients it requires very different medicines. A man 
might be “a man after God’s own heart,” and yet subject to the invasion of a crowd of anxieties. 
It is not uncommon for religious persons to erect standards of excellence, failing to reach which 
they become uneasy and doubtful as to their spiritual state. Reading the promises of the Bible, 
which speak of the righteous as “kept in perfect peace,” which breathe tranquillity, abstraction 
from earthly cares and foretastes of the blessedness of heaven, they conclude that what they 
ought to experience is perfect serenity of mind; and when they often experience distracting 
anxieties which the spirit is unable to throw off altogether, and when in times of approaching in 
prayer the Lord God of heaven and earth, they find their attention broken, then they will add to 
every other grief a worse grief than all—they will suspect their own sincerity in religion. And 
never can it be a part of our business to lessen the extent of what is blameworthy, or to 
endeavour to persuade the righteous that freedom from anxiety is not a privilege to be sought 
for, or that the concentration of the whole soul is not to be attempted, and failure therein not 
bitterly lamented. But we know that amid the turmoil of this busy world there will often be such 
an invasion of the altar of the Lord as when the birds came down on Abraham’s sacrifice. “The 
spirit indeed is willing, but the flesh is weak.” And whilst we could not wish men to regard their 
infirmities as sufficient excuses, or to be content with imperfection, as though unavoidable; still, 
where there is the honest endeavour to stay the mind on God, and abstract it from earth, we may 
tell them that piety may consist with anxiety, and sincerity of prayer with a multitude of 
thoughts. God is speaking to those who were sorely distracted, and yet He still calls them “My 
people.” It is not every failure which should fill you with apprehension as to your state before 
God. 
So wonderfully are we made, so many are the inlets into the mind, so great are the facilities with 
which evil angels can ply their suggestions, so difficult, moreover, is it to keep that attention to 
worldly business which is required from us as members of society, from being deformed by that 
carefulness which is forbidden us as members of Christ’s Church; that, indeed, it were vain to 
hope, however it be right to desire, that anxiety shall never harass us in a world that teems with 
trouble. So far from being necessarily a cause of despair or despondency, the Christian may rise 
superior to all these intruders, and prove that they do but heighten the blessedness of the 
blessing, though invaded by the influence of earth. God speaks to those as still “His people” who 
are wearied and worn down with warfare and toil; and in place of speaking to them 
reproachfully He has only soothing things to utter—“Comfort ye,” etc. 
II. Our latter observations have somewhat trenched on THE CHARACTER OF THE MEDICINE 
which should be tried when the disease is a multitude of thoughts; but we must now examine 
with attention, and endeavour to determine its faithfulness and its efficiency. The case is that of 

a righteous man on whom cares and sorrows press with great weight; and whose mind is torn 
with anxieties and thronged by a crowd of restless intruders distracting him even in his 
communings with God. Now, the very disease under which this man labours incapacitates him 
in a great measure for any process of argument. His distracted mind is quite unfitted for that 
calm and searching inquiry which is required into the matter of the evidences of Christianity for 
strictly convincing him of the inspiration of Scripture. His mind is evidently unfitted for duly 
considering, and examining with that singleness of purpose which is demanded by their 
solemnity, mysteriousness, and importance such truths as those of the Trinity, the Incarnation, 
and the Atonement. Ask ye what these comforts are? There are the rich assurances of God’s 
forgiving love; there are the gracious declarations of His everlasting purpose of preserving to the 
end those whom He has chosen in Christ; there are the multiplied promises which make to the 
eye of faith the page of Scripture one sheet of burning brightness, always presenting most 
radiantly what is most suited to the necessity. There are the foretastes of immortality. You may 
without sinfulness and merely through infirmity be invaded and harassed by a multitude of 
thoughts. But the evil is that when thus invaded and harassed the Christian is apt to attempt a 
critical examination of his spiritual state, to encourage doubts as to his acceptance with God, 
and to try and satisfy himself by some process of reasoning as to whether he has indeed believed 
unto the saving of his soul, whereas his very state is one which unfits him for reasoning, for 
sitting in judgment on himself, and delivering an accurate verdict. He is sick, and requires God’s 
comfort. 
III. The comforting message is to be delivered to Jerusalem, and annexed is a statement of her 
warfare being accomplished; and if you connect with this the exclamation of St. Paul—“I have 
fought the good fight, I have finished my course,” you will see that we make no far-fetched 
application of the text, if we affirm it as SPECIALLY APPROPRIATE ON THE APPROACH OF 
THE LAST ENEMY, DEATH. Never is it likely that there will be a more tumultuous gathering of 
conflicting emotions than when the mind fixes itself on approaching death. It is here that the 
power of all mere human resources must eventually fail. Christianity furnishes an abundance of 
what is needed for allaying the fear of death, and soothing man’s passage to the tomb. (H.
Mevill, B. D.) 
 
 
Her warfare is accomplished 
The Christian’s warfare 
The acceptableness of any announcement will depend very much upon the state of mind and 
feeling in which we are found in respect to the subject of such announcement. Go to the soldier, 
wearied with a long campaign, and many a hazardous engagement, longing for a sight of his 
beloved home—to him how welcome will be the announcement, “Thy warfare is accomplished!” 
It was on this principle that the prophet Isaiah was directed to take a message of consolation to 
the ancient people of God. The language of the text may, without any impropriety, be applied to 
the termination of any state of anxiety, hardship, and grief. 
I. THE LIFE OF THE TRUE BELIEVER IS A WARFARE. Frequen tly is it represented to us in 
the Holy Scripture by this form of military phraseology. Hence, says the apostle, “Fight the good 
fight of faith”; and, writing to Timothy, “That by these thou mightest war a good warfare”; “I 
have fought a good fight,” etc. 
1. The great principle of the conflict is faith, founded and implanted in the mind by a super-
natural agency. No man will ever in a Christian sense contend, until he is united by a living 
faith to Jesus, the Son of God: for faith acquaints him with his spiritual enemies; faith is the 
principle of the new life which puts itself into an attitude of resistance against all that is 

hostile to itself. “This is the victory that over-cometh the world, even our faith.” When a man 
is slumbering in his sin, nothing is further from his thoughts than to maintain a spiritual 
conflict with invisible, spiritual existences; but, under the influence of faith, he will find he is 
surrounded by a legion of foes. He looks within, and there he finds the corruption of fallen 
nature. Besides the corruption of an evil nature, there are the powers of darkness. The world, 
even in its lawful form, is a very serious enemy to our spiritual progress and our spiritual 
peace. 
2. This contention will continue as long as life shall last. 
II. THE HOUR OF DEATH WITNESSES THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF TH IS WARFARE. 
1. Death is the instrumental means of separating us from our connection with the present 
evil world; it strikes at once a line of demarcation, which throws us beyond the reach of all 
the elements of this present sensible life. He upon whom death has performed his solemn 
office, has no further interest in the possessions, the endearments, the gains, the business, 
the pleasures, and the satisfactions of this vain world. 
2. Then, death terminates the strife of sin. 
3. Death confesses that the believer is a conqueror over himself, and fields the palm of 
victory at the moment when he inflicts the blow (1Co_15:55-57). 
III. THE CONSOLING AND EXHILARATING QUALITIES OF THIS BL ESSED 
CONSUMMATION. 
1. When the warfare ends, the rest begins. 
2. This state of rest is also a state of peculiar and inexpressible delight. It is something more 
than rest, as implying a cessation from toil and from contention; it is a joyful rest. Think of 
the place of rest into which the departed spirits of the just are received. They are where 
Christ is; they behold His glory. And then, consider the society to which the ransomed spirits 
of the just are admitted. Think of the employments to which they are advanced. They serve 
God day and night in His temple, and His name is in their foreheads. 
3. This felicity is evermore increasing. 
4. This felicity will be for ever and ever. “So shall we ever be with the Lord.” (G. Clayton.) 
 
 
Undeserved grace 
“Fulfilled is her warfare, absolved her guilt, received hath she of Jehovah’s hand double for all 
her sins.” The very grammar here is eloquent of grace. The emphasis lies on the three predicates, 
which ought to stand in translation, as they do in the original, at the beginning of each clause. 
Prominence is given, not to the warfare, nor to the guilt, nor to the sins, but to this, that 
“accomplished” is the warfare, “absolved” the guilt, “sufficiently expiated” the sins. It is a great 
At Last which these clauses peal forth; but an At Last whose tone is not so much inevitableness 
as undeserved grace. (Prof. G. A. Smith, D. D.) 
 
 
Grace masked by grace 
How full of pity God is, to take so much account of the sufferings sinners have brought upon 
themselves! How full of grace to reckon those sufferings “double the sins” that had earned them! 
It is, as when we have seen gracious men make us a free gift, and in their courtesy insist that we 
have worked for it. It is grace masked by grace. (Prof. G. A. Smith, D. D.) 

 
 
Double for all her sins 
“Double for all her sins” 
It is not to be pressed arithmetically, in which case God would appear over-righteous, and 
therefore unrighteous. (F. Delitzsch, D. D.) 
 
 
 
 
3 A voice of one calling: 
“In the wilderness prepare 
    the way for the Lord[a]; 
make straight in the desert 
    a highway for our God.[b] 
 
1.BARNES, “The voice of him that crieth - Lowth and Noyes render this, ‘A voice crieth,’ 
and annex the phrase ‘in the wilderness’ to the latter part of the sentence: 
A voice crieth, ‘In the wilderness prepare ye the way of Yahweh.’ 
The Hebrew (
ארוק לוק  "kt. "kt_Im)) will bear this construction, though the Vulgate and the 
Septuagint render it as in our common version. The sense is not essentially different, though the 
parallelism seems to require the translation proposed by Lowth. The design is to state the source 
of consolation referred to in the previous verses. The time of the exile at Babylon was about to be 
completed. Yahweh was about to conduct his people again to their own country through the 
pathless wilderness, as he had formerly conducted them from Egypt to the land of promise. The 
prophet, therefore, represents himself as hearing the voice of a herald, or a forerunner in the 
pathless waste, giving direction that a way should be made for the return of the people. The 
whole scene is represented as a march, or return of Yahweh at the head of his people to the land 
of Judea. The idea is taken from the practice of Eastern monarchs, who whenever they entered 

on a journey or an expedition, especially through a barren and unfrequented or inhospitable 
country, sent harbingers or heralds before them to prepare the way. 
To do this, it was necessary for them to provide supplies, and make bridges, or find fording 
places over the streams; to level hills, and construct causeways over valleys, or fill them up; and 
to make a way through the forest which might lie in their intended line of march. This was 
necessary, because these contemplated expeditions often involved the necessity of marching 
through countries where there were no public highways that would afford facilities for the 
passage of an army. Thus Arrian (Hist. liv. 30) says of Alexander, ‘He now proceeded to the 
River Indus, the army’ that is, 63στρατιά  he stratia, a part of the army, or an army sufficient for 
the purpose, ‘going before, which made a way for him, for otherwise there would have been no 
mode of passing through that region.’ ‘When a great prince in the East,’ says Paxton, ‘sets out on 
a journey, it is usual to send a party of men before him to clear the way. 
The state of those countries in every age, where roads are almost unknown, and, from want of 
cultivation, in many places overgrown with brambles and other thorny plants, which renders 
traveling, especially with a large retinue, incommodious, requires this precaution. The Emperor 
of Hindoostan, in his progress through his dominions, as described in the narrative of Sir 
Thomas Roe’s embassy to the court of Delhi, was preceded by a very great company, sent before 
him to cut up the trees and bushes, to level and snmoth the road, and prepare their place of 
encampment. We shall be able, perhaps, to form a more clear and precise idea from the account 
which Diodorus gives of the marches of Semiramis, the celebrated Queen of Babylon, into Media 
and, Persia. “In her march to Ecbatana,” says the historian, “she came to the Zarcean mountain, 
which, extending many furlongs, and being full of craggy precipices and deep hollows, could not 
be passed without taking a great compass. Being therefore desirous of leaving an everlasting 
memorial of herself, as well as of shortening the way, she ordered the precipices to be digged 
down, and the hollows to be filled up; and at a great expense she made a shorter and more 
expeditious road; which to this day is called from her the road of Semiramis. Afterward she went 
into Persia, and all the other countries of Asia subjected to her dominion, and wherever she 
went, she ordered the mountains and precipices to be leveled, raised causeways in the plain 
country, and, at a great expense, made the ways passable.” 
The writer of the apocryphal Book of Baruch, refers to the same subject by the same images: 
‘For God hath appointed that every high hill, and banks of long continuance, should be cast 
down, and valleys filled up, to make even the ground, that Israel may go safely in the glory of 
God’ Isa_5:7. It is evident that the primary reference of this passage was to the exiles in Babylon, 
and to their return from their long captivity, to the land of their father. The imagery, the 
circumstances, the design of the prophecy, all seem to demand such an interpretation. At the 
same time it is as clear, I apprehend, that the prophet was inspired to use language, of design, 
which should appropriately express a more important event, the coming of the forerunner of the 
Messiah, and the work which he should perform as preparatory to his advent. There was such a 
striking similarity in the two events, that they could be grouped together in the same part of the 
prophetic vision or picture the mind would naturally, by the laws of prophetic suggestion 
(Introduction, Section 7, III. (3), glance from one to the other, and the same language would 
appropriately and accurately express both. Both could be described as the coming of Yahweh to 
bless and save his people; both occurred after a long state of desolation and bondage - the one a 
bondage in Babylon, the other in sin and national declension. The pathless desert was literally to 
be passed through in the one instance; in the other, the condition of the Jews was that which 
was not unaptly likened to a desert - a condition in regard to real piety not unlike the state of a 
vast desert in comparison with fruitful fields. ‘It was,’ says Lowth, ‘in this desert country, 
destitute at that time of all religious cultivation, in true piety and works unfruitful, that John 
was sent to prepare the way of the Lord by preaching repentance. 

That this passage has a reference to John as the forerunner of the Messiah, is evident from 
Mat_3:3, where it is applied to him, and introduced by this remark: ‘For this is he that was 
spoken of by the prophet Esaias, saying, The voice,’ etc. (see also Joh_1:23) The events were so 
similar, in their main features, that the same language would describe both. John was nurtured 
in the desert, and passed his early life there, until he entered on his public work Luk_1:80. He 
began to preach in a mountainous country, lying east of Jerusalem, and sparsely inhabited, and 
which was usually spoken of as a desert or wilderness Mat_3:1; and it was here that his voice 
was heard announcing the coming of the Messiah, and that he pointed him to his own followers 
Joh_1:28-29. 
In the wilderness - Babylon was separated from Judea by an immense tract of country, 
which was one continued desert. A large part of Arabia, called Arabia Deserts, was situated in 
this region. To pass in a direct line, therefore, from Babylon to Jerusalem, it was necessary to go 
through this desolate country. It was here that the prophet speaks of hearing a voice 
commanding the hills to be leveled, and the valleys filled up, that there might be a convenient 
highway for the people to return (compare the notes at Isa_35:8-10). 
Prepare ye the way - This was in the form of the usual proclamation of a monarch 
commanding the people to make a way for him to pass. Applied to the return of the exile Jews, it 
means that the command of God had gone forth that all obstacles should be removed. Applied to 
John, it means that the people were to prepare for the reception of the Messiah; that they were 
to remove all in their opinions and conduct which would tend to hinder his cordial reception, or 
which would prevent his success among them. 
Of the Lord - Of Yahweh. Yahweh was the leader of his people, and was about to conduct 
them to their own land. The march therefore, was regarded as that of Yahweh, as a monarch or 
king, at the head of his people, conducting them to their own country; and to prepare the way of 
Yahweh was, therefore, to prepare for his march at the head of his people. Applied to the 
Messiah, it means that God was about to come to his people to redeem them. This language 
naturally and obviously implies, that he whose way was thus to be prepared was Yahweh, the 
true God. So it was undoubtedly in regard to him who was to be the leader of the exile Jews to 
their own land, since none but Yahweh could thus conduct them. And if it be admitted that the 
language has also a reference to the Messiah, then it demonstrates that he was appropriately 
called Yahweh. That John the Immerser had such a view of him, is apparent from what is said of 
him. 
Thus, Joh_1:15, he says of him that, ‘he was before’ him which was not true unless he had an 
existence previous to his birth; he calls him, Joh_1:18, ‘the only begotten Son, which is in the 
bosom of the Father;’ and in Joh_1:34, he calls him ‘the Son of God’ (compare Joh_10:30, 
Joh_10:33, Joh_10:36). In Joh_3:31, he says of him, ‘he that cometh from above is above all; he 
that cometh from heaven is above all.’ Though this is not one of the most direct and certain 
proof texts of the divinity of the Messiah, yet it is one which may be applied to him when that 
divinity is demonstrated from other places. It is not one that can be used with absolute certainty 
in an argument on the subject, to convince those who deny that divinity - since, even on the 
supposition that it refers to the Messiah, it may be said plausibly, and with some force, that it 
may mean that Yahweh was about to manifest himself by means of the Messiah; yet it is a 
passage which those who are convinced of the divinity of Christ from other source, will apply 
without hesitation to him as descriptive of his rank, and confirmatory of his divinity. 
Make straight - Make a straight or direct road; one that should conduct at once to their 
land. The Chaldee renders this verse, ‘Prepare a way before the people of Yahweh; make in the 
plain ways before the congregation of our God.’ 
A highway - (See the note at Isa_35:8). 
 

 
2. CLARKE, “
The voice of him that crieth to the wilderness “A voice crieth, In the 
wilderness” - The idea is taken from the practice of eastern monarchs, who, whenever they 
entered upon an expedition or took a journey, especially through desert and unpractised 
countries, sent harbingers before them to prepare all things for their passage, and pioneers to 
open the passes, to level the ways, and to remove all impediments. The officers appointed to 
superintend such preparations the Latins call stratores. Ipse (Johannes Baptista) se stratorem
vocat Messiae, cujus esset alta et elata voce homines in desertis locis habitantes ad itinera et
vias Regi mox venturo sternendas et reficiendas hortari. - Mosheim, Instituta, Majora, p. 96. 
“He (John the Baptist) calls himself the pioneer of the Messiah, whose business it was with a 
loud voice to call upon the people dwelling in the deserts to level and prepare the roads by which 
the King was about to march.” 
Diodorus’s account of the marches of Semiramis into Media and Persia will give us a clear 
notion of the preparation of the way for a royal expedition: “In her march to Ecbatana she came 
to the Zarcean mountain, which, extending many furlongs, and being full of craggy precipices 
and deep hollows, could not be passed without taking a great compass about. Being therefore 
desirous of leaving an everlasting memorial of herself, as well as of shortening the way, she 
ordered the precipices to be digged down, and the hollows to be filled up; and at a great expense 
she made a shorter and more expeditious road, which to this day is called from her the road of 
Semiramis. Afterward she went into Persia, and all the other countries of Asia subject to her 
dominion; and wherever she went, she ordered the mountains and precipices to be levelled, 
raised causeways in the plain country, and at a great expense made the ways passable.” - Diod. 
Sic. lib. ii. 
The writer of the apocryphal book called Baruch expresses the same subject by the same 
images, either taking them from this place of Isaiah, or from the common notions of his 
countrymen: “For God hath appointed that every high hill, and banks of long continuance, 
should be cast down, and valleys filled up, to make even the ground, that Israel may go safely in 
the glory of God.” Baruch 5:7. 
The Jewish Church, to which John was sent to announce the coming of Messiah, was at that 
time in a barren and desert condition, unfit, without reformation, for the reception of her King. 
It was in this desert country, destitute at that time of all religious cultivation, in true piety and 
good works unfruitful, that John was sent to prepare the way of the Lord by preaching 
repentance. I have distinguished the parts of the sentence according to the punctuation of the 
Masoretes, which agrees best both with the literal and the spiritual sense; which the 
construction and parallelism of the distich in the Hebrew plainly favors, and of which the Greek 
of the Septuagint and of the evangelists is equally susceptible. John was born in the desert of 
Judea, and passed his whole life in it, till the time of his being manifested to Israel. He preached 
in the same desert: it was a mountainous country; however not entirely and properly a desert; 
for though less cultivated than other parts of Judea, yet it was not uninhabited. Joshua 
(
Jos_15:61, Jos_15:62) reckons six cities in it. We are so prepossessed with the idea of John’s 
living and preaching in the desert, that we are apt to consider this particular scene of his 
preaching as a very important and essential part of history: whereas I apprehend this 
circumstance to be no otherwise important, than as giving us a strong idea of the rough 
character of the man, which was answerable to the place of his education; and as affording a 
proper emblem of the rude state of the Jewish Church at that time, which was the true 
wilderness meant by the prophet, in which John was to prepare the way for the coming of the 
Messiah. 
 
 

3. GILL, “The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness,.... Not the voice of the Holy 
Ghost, as Jarchi; but of John the Baptist, as is attested by all the evangelists, Mat_3:3 and by 
John himself, Joh_1:23, who was a "voice" not like the man's nightingale, "vox et praeterea 
nihil" a voice and nothing else; he had not only a sonorous, but an instructive teaching voice; he 
had the voice of a prophet, for he was a prophet: we read of the voices of the prophets, their 
doctrines and prophecies, Act_13:27, his voice was the voice of one that crieth, that published 
and proclaimed aloud, openly and publicly, with great eagerness and fervency, with much 
freedom and liberty, what he had to say; and this was done "in the wilderness", in the wilderness 
of Judea, literally taken, Mat_3:1, and when Judea was become a Roman province, and the Jews 
were brought into the wilderness of the people, Eze_20:35 and when they were, as to their 
religious affairs, in a very forlorn and wilderness condition (m): what John was to say, when he 
came as a harbinger of Christ, and did, follows:  
 
prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our God: 
by whom is meant the Messiah to whose proper deity a noble testimony is here bore, being 
called "Jehovah" and "our God": whose way John prepared himself, by preaching the doctrine of 
repentance, administering the ordinance of baptism, pointing at the Messiah, and exhorting the 
people to believe in him; and he called upon them likewise to prepare the way, and make a plain 
path to meet him in, by repenting of their sins, amending their ways, and cordially embracing 
him when come, laying aside all those sentiments which were contrary to him, his Gospel, and 
kingdom. The sense of this text is sadly perverted by the Targum, and seems to be, done on 
purpose, thus,  
 
"prepare the way before the people of the Lord, cast up ways before the congregation of our 
God;''  
 
whereas it is before the Lord himself. The allusion is to pioneers, sent before some great 
personage to remove all obstructions out of his way, to cut down trees, level the way, and clear 
all before him, as in the following verse.  
 
(m) Though, according to the accents, the phrase, "in the wilderness", belongs to what follows, 
"in the wilderness prepare ye the way of the Lord"; where it is placed by Junius and Tremellius, 
commended for it by Reinbeck, de Accent, Heb. p. 416. though the accent seems neglected in 
Matt iii. 3. Mark 1. 3. 
 
4. HENRY, “
The time to favour Zion, yea, the set time, having come, the people of God must 
be prepared, by repentance and faith, for the favours designed them; and, in order to call them 
to both these, we have here the voice of one crying in the wilderness, which may be applied to 
those prophets who were with the captives in their wilderness-state, and who, when they saw the 
day of their deliverance dawn, called earnestly upon them to prepare for it, and assured them 
that all the difficulties which stood in the way of their deliverance should be got over. It is a good 
sign that mercy is preparing for us if we find God's grace preparing us for it, 
Psa_10:17. But it 
must be applied to John the Baptist; for, though God was the speaker, he was the voice of one
crying in the wilderness, and his business was to prepare the way of the Lord, to dispose men's 
minds for the reception and entertainment of the gospel of Christ. The way of the Lord is 
prepared, 
I. By repentance for sin; that was it which John Baptist preached to all Judah and Jerusalem 
(Mat_3:2, Mat_3:5), and thereby made ready a people prepared for the Lord, Luk_1:17. 

1. The alarm is given; let all take notice of it at their peril; God is coming in a way of mercy, and 
we must prepare for him, Isa_40:3-5. If we apply it to their captivity, it may be taken as a 
promise that, whatever difficulties lie in their way, when they return they shall be removed. This 
voice in the wilderness (divine power going along with it) sets pioneers on work to level the 
roads. But it may be taken as a call to duty, and it is the same duty that we are called to, in 
preparation for Christ's entrance into our souls. (1.) We must get into such a frame of spirit as 
will dispose us to receive Christ and his gospel: “Prepare you the way of the Lord; prepare 
yourselves for him, and let all that be suppressed which would be an obstruction to his entrance. 
Make room for Christ: Make straight a highway for him.” If he prepare the end for us, we ought 
surely to prepare the way for him. Prepare for the Saviour; lift up your heads, O you gates! 
Psa_24:7, Psa_24:9. Prepare for the salvation, the great salvation, and other minor 
deliverances. Let us get to be fit for them, and then God will work them out. Let us not stand in 
our own light, nor put a bar in our own door, but find, or make, a highway for him, even in that 
which was desert ground. This is that for which he waits to be gracious. (2.) We must get our 
hearts levelled by divine grace. Those that are hindered from comfort in Christ by their 
dejections and despondencies are the valleys that must be exalted. Those that are hindered from 
comfort in Christ by a proud conceit of their own merit and worth are the mountains and hills 
that must be made low. Those that have entertained prejudices against the word and ways of 
God, that are untractable, and disposed to thwart and contradict even that which is plain and 
easy because it agrees not with their corrupt inclinations and secular interests, are the crooked 
that must be made straight and the rough places that must be made plain. Let but the gospel of 
Christ have a fair hearing, and it cannot fail of acceptance. This prepares the way of the Lord; 
and thus God will by his grace prepare his own way in all the vessels of mercy, whose hearts he 
opens as he did Lydia's.
 
5. JAMISON, “
crieth in the wilderness — So the Septuagint and 
Mat_3:3 connect the 
words. The Hebrew accents, however, connect them thus: “In the wilderness prepare ye,” etc., 
and the parallelism also requires this, “Prepare ye in the wilderness,” answering to “make 
straight in the desert.” Matthew was entitled, as under inspiration, to vary the connection, so as 
to bring out another sense, included in the Holy Spirit’s intention; in Mat_3:1, “John the 
Baptist, preaching in the wilderness,” answers thus to “The voice of one crying in the
wilderness.” Maurer takes the participle as put for the finite verb (so in Isa_40:6), “A voice 
crieth.” The clause, “in the wilderness,” alludes to Israel’s passage through it from Egypt to 
Canaan (Psa_68:7), Jehovah being their leader; so it shall be at the coming restoration of Israel, 
of which the restoration from Babylon was but a type (not the full realization; for their way from 
it was not through the “wilderness”). Where John preached (namely, in the wilderness; the type 
of this earth, a moral wilderness), there were the hearers who are ordered to prepare the way of 
the Lord, and there was to be the coming of the Lord [Bengel]. John, though he was immediately 
followed by the suffering Messiah, is rather the herald of the coming reigning Messiah, as 
Mal_4:5, Mal_4:6 (“before the great and dreadful day of the Lord”), proves. Mat_17:11 
(compare Act_3:21) implies that John is not exclusively meant; and that though in one sense 
Elias has come, in another he is yet to come. John was the figurative Elias, coming “in the spirit
and power of Elias” (Luk_1:17); Joh_1:21, where John the Baptist denies that he was the actual 
Elias, accords with this view. Mal_4:5, Mal_4:6 cannot have received its exhaustive fulfillment 
in John; the Jews always understood it of the literal Elijah. As there is another consummating 
advent of Messiah Himself, so perhaps there is to be of his forerunner Elias, who also was 
present at the transfiguration. 
the Lord — Hebrew, Jehovah; as this is applied to Jesus, He must be Jehovah (Mat_3:3). 

 
 
6. K&D, “
There is a sethume in the text at this point. The first two vv. form a small parashah 
by themselves, the prologue of the prologue. After the substance of the consolation has been 
given on its negative side, the question arises, What positive salvation is to be expected? This 
question is answered for the prophet, inasmuch as, in the ecstatic stillness of his mind as turned 
to God, he hears a marvellous voice. “Hark, a crier! In the wilderness prepare ye a way for
Jehovah, make smooth in the desert a road for our God.” This is not to be rendered “a voice 
cries” (Ges., Umbreit, etc.); but the two words are in the construct state, and form an 
interjectional clause, as in 
Isa_13:4; Isa_52:8; Isa_66:6 : Voice of one crying! Who the crier is 
remains concealed; his person vanishes in the splendour of his calling, and falls into the 
background behind the substance of his cry. The cry sounds like the long-drawn trumpet-blast 
of a herald (cf., Isa_16:1). The crier is like the outrider of a king, who takes care that the way by 
which the king is to go shall be put into good condition. The king is Jehovah; and it is all the 
more necessary to prepare the way for Him in a becoming manner, that this way leads through 
the pathless desert. 
| ooOQv t_ is to be connected with pannu, according to the accents on 
account of the parallel (
zakeph3katan has a stronger disjunctive force here than zekpeh3gadol, as in 
Deu_26:14; Deu_28:8; 2Ki_1:6), though without any consequent collision with the New 
Testament description of the fulfilment itself. And so also the Targum and Jewish expositors 
take רבדמב 3ֵרוק לוק together, like the lxx, and after this the Gospels. We may, or rather apparently 
we must, imagine the crier as advancing into the desert, and summoning the people to come and 
make a road through it. But why does the way of Jehovah lie through the desert, and whither 
does it lead? It was through the desert that He went to redeem Israel out of Egyptian bondage, 
and to reveal Himself to Israel from Sinai (Deu_33:2; Jdg_5:4; Psa_88:8); and in Psa_88:4 (5.) 
God the Redeemer of His people is called x t_kmKxImvx v tp d_ tvxkmSx. Just as His people looked for 
Him then, when they were between Egypt and Canaan; so was He to be looked for by His people 
again, now that they were in the “desert of the sea” (Isa_21:1), and separated by Arabia deserta 
from their fatherland. If He were coming at the head of His people, He Himself would clear the 
hindrances out of His way; but He was coming through the desert to Israel, and therefore Israel 
itself was to take care that nothing should impede the rapidity or detract from the favour of the 
Coming One. The description answers to the reality; but, as we shall frequently find as we go 
further on, the literal meaning spiritualizes itself in an allegorical way. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “3.A voice crying in the wilderness. He follows out the subject which he had begun, and
declares more explicitly that he will send to the people, though apparently ruined, ministers of
consolation. At the same time he anticipates an objection which might have been brought forward. “ do
indeed promise consolation, but where are the prophets? For we shall be ‘ a wilderness,’ and whence
shall this consolation come to us?” He therefore testifies that “ wilderness” shall not hinder them from
enjoying that consolation.

The wilderness is employed to denote metaphorically that desolation which then existed; though I do not
deny that the Prophet alludes to the intermediate journey; (110) for the roughness of the wilderness
seemed to forbid their return. He promises, therefore, that although every road were shut up, and not a
chink were open, the Lord will easily cleave a path through the most impassable tracts for himself and his
people.

Prepare the way of Jehovah. Some connect the words “ the wilderness” with this clause, and explain it
thus, “ the way of Jehovah in the wilderness.” But the Prophet appears rather to represent a voice which
shall gather together those who had wandered and had, as it were, been banished from the habitable
globe. “ you behold nothing but a frightful desert, yet this voice of consolation shall be heard from the
mouth of the prophets.” These words relate to the hard bondage which they should undergo in Babylon.

But to whom is that voice addressed? Is it to believers? No, but to Cyrus, to the Persians, and to the
Medes, who held that people in captivity. Having been alienated from obedience to God, they are
constrained to deliver the people; and therefore they are enjoined to “ and pave the way,” that the people
of God may be brought back to Judea; as if he had said:, “ passable what was impassable.” The power
and efficacy of this prediction is thus held up for our applause; for when God invests his servants with
authority to command men who were cruel and addicted to plunder, and who at that time were the
conquerors of Babylon, to “ the way” for the return of his people, he means that nothing shall hinder the
fulfillment of his promise, because he will employ them all as hired servants. Hence we obtain an
excellent consolation, when we see that God makes use of irreligious men for our salvation, and employs
all the creatures, when the case demands it, for that end.

A highway for our God. When it, is said that the way shall be prepared not for the Jews, but for God
himself, we have here a remarkable proof of his love towards us; for he applies to himself what related to
the salvation of his chosen people. The Lord had nothing to do with walking, and had no need of a road;
but he shews that we are so closely united to him that what is done on our account he reckons to be done
to himself. This mode of expression is frequently employed elsewhere, as when it is said that God “ forth
into battle with his anointed,” (Hab_3:13,) and that “ rode through the midst of Egypt,” (Exo_11:4,) and
that he lifted up his standard and led his people through the wilderness. (Isa_63:13.)

This passage is quoted by the Evangelists, (Mat_3:3; Mar_1:3; Luk_3:4,) and applied to John the Baptist,
as if these things had been foretold concerning him, and not unjustly; for he held the highest rank among
the messengers and heralds of our redemption, of which the deliverance from Babylon was only a type.
And, indeed, at the time when the Church arose out of her wretched and miserable condition, her mean
appearance bore a stronger resemblance than the Babylonish captivity to a “” but God wished that they
should see plainly, in the wilderness in which John taught, the image and likeness of that miserably
ruinous condition by which the whole beauty of the Church was injured and almost destroyed. What is
here described metaphorically by the Prophet was at that time actually fulfilled; for at an exceedingly
disordered and ruinous crisis John lifted up the banner of joy. True, indeed, the same voice had been
previously uttered by Daniel, Zechariah, and others; but the nearer the redemption approached, the more
impressively could it be proclaimed by John, who also pointed out Christ with the finger. (Joh_1:29.) But
because, in the midst of a nation which was ignorant and almost sunk in stupidity, there were few that
sincerely grieved for their ruinous condition, John sought a wilderness, that the very sight of the place
might arouse careless persons to hope and desire the promised deliverance. As to his denying that he
was a Prophet, (Joh_1:21,) this depends on the end of his calling and the substance of his doctrine; for
he was not sent to discharge apart any continued office, but, as a herald, to gain an audience for Christ
his Master and Lord. What is here said about removing obstructions, he applies skilfully to individuals, on
this ground, that the depravity of our nature, the windings of a crooked mind, and obstinacy of heart, shut
up the way of the Lord, and hinder them from preparing, by true self?denial, to yield obedience.



(110) “Au chemin d’ Iudee et Babylone.” “ the road between Judea and Babylon.”

7B. GREAT TEXTS OF THE BIBLE, “The Forerunner 
 
The voice of one that crieth, Prepare ye in the wilderness the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert
a high way for our God.—Isa_40:3.
All the four Evangelists refer these words to the ministry of St. John the Baptist. In the Baptist they
received their highest and complete fulfilment. But their first and historical reference is to the return of the
Jewish captives from Babylon. The Lord was the King of the chosen people; and in the vision of the
prophet, the promised return to home and freedom was to be a triumphant procession across the desert,
headed by Israel’s invisible Monarch. The cause of the holy people was the cause of God; their bondage
and shame in Babylon, although a heaven?sent punishment, had been a humiliation for the majesty of
Jehovah before the face of the scoffing heathen; their triumphant return would be the work of God, it
would also be the manifestation of His glory. No obstacle should stop the path of His resistless advance:
“Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low: and the crooked shall be
made straight, and the rough places plain: and the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall
see it together: for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.”

Clearly there is here a wider reach of meaning than any which can be satisfied by the actual prospect or
history of the return from Babylon. Say what you will about the highly poetical form into which the prophet
has undoubtedly thrown his fervid thought, still here is the thought beneath the form which clothes it. If it
would be a degrading mistake to resolve this passage into a mere description of some vast engineering
operation: if valleys were not literally to be filled up, and mountains were not literally to be levelled,
something, at any rate, was to take place in the moral, social, or political world which should correspond
to this vigorous imagery. And that something was to interest, not merely the Jewish race and their
heathen neighbours, but the whole human family: “All flesh shall see it together.” It is clear that the
particular, local, temporal deliverance melts before the eye of the prophet—as, gazing on it, he describes
it—into a deliverance, general and world?wide in its significance, extending in its effects far beyond the
limits of time. The deliverance of deliverances is before him. He sees the great escape from bondage, of
which all earlier efforts at freedom were but shadows; he sees it afar off, the pathway of mankind across
the desert of time from the city of chains and sorrow, whereof Babylon was the earthly type, to the city of
freedom and glory imaged in Jerusalem.

And thus it is that the Evangelists so unhesitatingly apply the passage to St. John the Baptist. St. John
was the immediate forerunner of the Deliverer of humanity; St. John, as a hermit of the desert and a
preacher of repentance, supplied, by his life, the connecting link between the literal and spiritual senses
of the prophecy; St. John gathered up in himself, embodied and represented the ages of prediction and
expectation. He was the mind of the Old Testament in a concrete form, laying down its office and
proclaiming its work of preparation finished, when the Reality which it foreshadowed had come.
1 [Note: A. L.
Moore.]

The prophet’s mind is haunted by the vision of perfectness. He has seen it. Not in some dream of
shadowy romance has his mind toyed with the bright imagination, but in his hours of deepest commerce
with the unseen has this great thing been unveiled, and he has gazed upon its holy beauty. It may lie in
dim distances. It may be the final issue of many a bitter conflict and many a dreadful struggle. It may tax
the faith, and try the hope, and wear away the strength of generations of holy men and women before its
fine glory shall be translated into the actual fact of life. But there it is—a profound and actual reality. His
inspired imagination has run forward to greet it, his sometime despondent heart has rested in its certainty.
“The glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.” That is the revelation, that the
certainty, the hope, and the joy. The world may have no eyes for the glory of the vision, the wise may be
deaf to the Voice that declared it. The cynic may burst into ironic laughter, and the coarse interpret its
holy prophecy in terms of madness. But goodness ever has its own vision. The prophet has ever been the

man with eyes in his soul. He can sing with Abt Vogler—

But God has a few of us whom He whispers in the ear;

The rest may reason and welcome: ’tis we musicians know.

One holy vision fills his mind and heart—there is a perfectness which is dowered with supremacy, beauty,
and abidingness. And ultimately that shall surely triumph.
1 [Note: G. B. Austin, The Beauty of Goodness, p. 190.]

 

 
The Need of Deliverance
1. The herald and hastener of a better and holier day must be distinguished first by a profound sense of
the evil of the present. The prophet was no blind optimist cherishing a foolish hope of a better and happier
future, because he did not see the abounding evils around him. He saw with clear, penetrating eyes, the
moral and spiritual degradation of his nation and day; saw how king and priests and people were, with
few exceptions, eaten with idolatry as with a cancer. He speaks of it, aye, and of the national evils which
must issue from it—exile, defeat, the overthrow of their beautiful city. That is true of the prophetic band
from first to last—from Elijah to John. They saw, they were oppressed by, the evils in Church and State—
were almost overwhelmed by them—and rose up in indignant condemnation. They pointed out the
unescapable issue of the evil they saw, and demanded a return to a simpler and purer life. Elijah, with
trumpet voice, demands: “How long halt ye?” And John lifts up his voice in the desert and bids men “flee
from the wrath to come.” A profound sense of the sinfulness of sin, and of the wrath of God which abides
perpetually upon it, distinguishes those who were the “road?makers” of past ages. I do not say it was not
shared by many of their countrymen, but it is as true of these men as it is of men of our own day—the
holier and the more consecrated to God feel the evil and the sin most. They see the mountains of
injustice that need to be levelled, the abysses of vice to be filled in, the crookedness, falsity of social life,
the inequalities which make the existence of myriads a lifelong martyrdom.

2. What then was the evil which Christ was to conquer in man and for man? It was sin. Sin is the one real
evil. It is certainly worse than pain, since pain may become a good. It is certainly worse than death, since
death is only the effect of sin, and may be the gate of freedom. It is worse even than the devil, since it
makes the devil to be what he is. The devil would be powerless, and death would have no sting, and pain
would be unknown, if it were not for sin. But sin is not a thing always palpable to and recognised by the
sinner. It is, says Liddon, like the peculiar atmosphere in which we pass the great part of our lives here in
Oxford. Looking down upon our homes from the top of Shotover, we see the thick damp fog burying this
city and valley beneath a shroud of unwholesome vapour; but here in the streets of Oxford we scarcely
observe it hanging in the sunlight, except when it becomes excessive in the depth of winter. Sin is just
such a mist as this: it is a fog, a blight, impalpable yet real, about us, around us, within us. It bathes our
moral life on this side and that, and withal it blinds us to the fact of its existence. If man would take a true
measure of sin, he must be lifted out of it; he must ascend to some moral eminence, whence its real
character will be made plain to him, and where he may form strong resolutions to close with any offer of
deliverance and escape from its importunity and thraldom. Now such an eminence was supplied in early
days by the gift of a moral law. The law did not add to the stock of existing evil, but it drew the
unsuspected latent sin of man forth into the daylight; it irritated into intense vigour the principle of
opposition which, even when dormant, is ever so strong in sinful human nature, and which shows itself,
under the irritation, in its true light as sin. The law was like those remedies in medicine which rid us of a
disease by bringing it to the surface, or, as we say, by precipitating it; it forced man to see what he really
is, and to forget what he had fancied himself to be. “By the law is the knowledge of sin.”

3. But men must be convinced of the evil and of the need of deliverance from it. Take an illustration. We
know that in this country no political measure that really touches the interests of the people can receive

the sanction and the force of law, unless the people themselves are convinced that the evils which the
measure proposes to remedy are substantial and not fancy evils. No legislative genius on the part of the
minister can dispense with this condition of success. If the country is not convinced that the measure is
necessary, the minister must take measures that will produce this conviction. He must hold meetings; he
must make speeches; he must write dissertations; he must deal in dry statistical demonstrations and in
vehemently passionate appeals; he must set in motion all the complicated machinery of political agitation
and enterprise which may be at his disposal. Supposing him to be himself satisfied of the necessity of the
measure in contemplation, this is nothing more than his duty to his country; he would fail of that duty if he
should neglect to diffuse, according to the best of his power, that amount of political information which is
necessary to his success.

You will not understand me to be saying that here we have a strict and absolute analogy to the sacred
matter immediately before us; because it is plain that the correspondence fails in a most vital particular.
We all know that the enactment of a new law in a free country is, in reality, the act not of the legislature
but of the people; the legislature is only the instrument of the popular will. But the redemption of the world
is in no wise the work of redeemed man; Christ is the one Redeemer, in whose redemptive triumph man
could have no part save that of accepting and sharing its blessings. Yet this deliberate acceptance of
Christ’s Redemption by man is of vital necessity to man; man is not saved against or without his will to be
saved; and it is therefore of the last importance that he should understand his need of the salvation which
he must desire and accept.

4. And not only must men be convinced of the need of deliverance, but the Church (taking the
forerunner’s place) must prepare for the coming of the Deliverer. In the language of the prophet, it is the
business of the Church to prepare a highway for Him in the desert. This is a very significant statement, for
the world resents the idea that it is a desert and not fit to receive the Saviour when He comes to it. The
tendency of all human systems of religion, in these days at least, is to make the best of whatever there is
found among men. It is popular to say that there is a great deal of good in the world after all. That is false,
however, except so far as the Gospel has won its way into the hearts of men. The world is essentially evil.
“All that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the
Father,” says the apostle. Men lose sight of this fact, that the whole world lies in sin, and that God is
displeased with it. There is no inherent goodness in it that can be brought out into the light and cherished
and developed until it becomes a valuable auxiliary of the work of the Church. No, the world is a desert,
and its barrenness and worthlessness are brought out into sharp relief by the “highway” which is to be
constructed right through it by the servants of God.

The servants of God have not only to build this highway through the desert, but they have also to make it
straight and level, for the Lord’s unhindered progress into the hearts of men. For there are many
obstacles to the spread of the Kingdom interposed by the world, and every one of them has to be met by
the Church and vanquished.

(1) Every valley is to be exalted. That is, the lowlands of indifference and sordid worldliness are to be
filled up and raised to the Gospel level. Divine truth is the great enlightener and quickener of the world.
The vast masses of mankind are indeed sunk in sin and shame, but it is largely because they have been
left so long in the pit, in the swampy places of every sort of misery and degradation, that they have lost
hope. They but strive to get through the days of this world’s life without grievous want of food or shelter,
and that is all. Nothing could be more pitiful than the hopeless misery and stolid indifference of the
teeming millions of earth’s poor. If Christ is to come into their lives, they must first be inspired to look up
and realise that better things are possible, that their condition need not be so wretched, as it is only for
the few years of this world’s span, and then every good and pleasant thing may be theirs in eternity, if
they but ally themselves with the gracious Redeemer who passes through their midst along this high
road.

(2) Not only are the valleys to be exalted, but the mountains and hills are to be made low. These
mountains and hills are the prejudices and self?satisfied ignorance of men, their wilful ways and false
systems, which they choose to think are better than the Gospel, or in any case equally good with it. They
will not suffer their creeds and philosophies and ideals to be beaten down. Yet this is just what the Church

has to do if she is to prepare the straight path for our Lord. Every human system upon which men pride
themselves is hostile to the Gospel. It must be broken down if Christ our Lord is to possess their hearts.
The wise one must surrender the fine?spun conceit of his theories and hypotheses, and bow to the
authority of the Gospel. And so it becomes the business of the Church in every way possible to overcome
the false systems and notions which oppose Divine truth, that the Master’s paths into the hearts of men
may be levelled.

(3) Again, the crooked places are to be made straight. How many of these there are, and what a
Herculean task it seems to be to try to overcome in men’s minds the opposition they have to the Divine
religion because of the inscrutable things in nature and in life’s experiences. Therefore the servants of
God who would make straight His path have to be striving, with tireless patience, to show their troubled
neighbours that there is wisdom in all manner of circumstances which at first sight appear merciless and
capricious.

(4) Once more, God’s servants are called to make the world’s rough places plain. How many places there
are, and how cruelly rough they often are also. We have to contend against this just as much in the
Church as without, for alas, Christians so seldom seem to illustrate the Christ?spirit in their lives, in their
daily intercourse with one another. As the apostle says, they bite and devour one another; so much so
that it is proverbial that ecclesiastical quarrels are the most bitter of all. It is no easy task to soften hard
hearts, to comfort sore hearts, to persuade men that there is something better in the Master’s religion
than they see exemplified commonly in the lives of believers. Yet there is no sort of labour more fruitful in
results than this. The constant effort to speak kindly, to act lovingly, to be gracious and sympathetic; slow
to take offence, quick to make up—such things as these move men more strongly than any words of
argument to embrace the Divine religion. Thus by making the rough places plain do we wonderfully make
straight the highway for our Lord in the desert of this world.

There is scarcely one good road throughout the length and breadth of Palestine. Travellers, as they
manage to pass their horses with difficulty along the wretched highways, or choose some adjacent path
over the open plain as far preferable to the road itself, often wonder whence come the huge rough stones
which so constantly obstruct the way. I was at a great loss to account for the presence of these, until my
attention was called, by W. Schick, our able architect at Jerusalem, to the manner in which many of them
are brought there. The camel, horse, and mule drivers, when they find the burdens they have arranged on
the backs of their sumpter animals are not equally poised, instead of rearranging them, have a cruel and
senseless custom of seizing any large stone which comes to hand, and placing it on that side where the
weight is deficient. This stone in time jolts off, and is replaced by another and often by a third and a
fourth, and in any case, at the journey’s end or when the animals are unloaded, is left where it falls in the
midst of the way. Besides this, in cleaning the vineyards, gardens, and arable land, stones are constantly
thrown out on to the nearest road. None of the highways, moreover, are at any time properly metalled,
and in winter they suffer very severely from the tropical torrents of rain. Neither is there any adequate
provision for keeping them in permanent order, even if they were efficiently made. Yet, notwithstanding
the almost impassable condition of the highways at ordinary times, I have repeatedly showed that on a
few occasions for brief intervals they were carefully mended. These few occasions were those of the
arrival of some royal personages. As soon as it was known at Jerusalem that a king or prince of the blood
was about to come through any of the adjacent parts of Palestine which lie within that pashalic, orders
were forthwith issued to the people of the various towns and villages to put all the roads in order over
which it was arranged he should pass. This was done as usual by means of enforced labour, as was
probably the case in former times.
1 [Note: James Neil, Palestine Explored.]

When I was a boy I sometimes used to stay at a little farm in the country, and of the many delights of my
holiday there, I do not think that any were more delightful than a ride in the farmer’s cart. The farmer’s
cart had no springs under it; the tub was fixed straight to the axle, and when it came to ruts or rough
places upon the road we knew it. Sometimes we went down with such a sudden jerk that we were almost
jerked out of the cart. Well, I used to like that jolting; I did not mind at all those rough places in the road.
But I find that as people get on in life they do not like these shakings up; they prefer to go along easily
and smoothly. And when people in Brighton want to go for a ride in a cab or carriage, they always look

out for one that has written on the lamps, “Rubber Tyres.” You see, the rubber tyres on the wheels make
the rough places plain; that is, they take off the friction; they lessen the unpleasant jolting, and people’s
nerves are not so strained as they would be if they went along the road in an old cart like the one I used
to enjoy going for a ride in, that was fastened to the axle without springs between or rubber tyres on the
wheels. Well, now, I want you to remember that the road of life is rough for most people, and it is rough
sometimes even for boys and girls. It is possible for us all to do something to make life easier, to take
away the friction and the unpleasantness of life, and to make it more pleasant and more enjoyable for
those going over the road.
1 [Note: D. J. Llewellyn.]

 
II 
 
The Deliverer
The discovery of man’s deep need was accompanied by another discovery, the revelation of a
Deliverance. The hopes of man are as ancient as his despondency. At the gates of Eden was given the
promise that the seed of the woman should bruise the serpent’s head. We interpret that promise, and
rightly enough, in the light of its fulfilment. But when it was given it might have seemed vague, and
capable of many interpretations; nothing was certain except that man’s deliverance would in some way be
wrought out through humanity itself. Around this promise all the faith and hope of the earliest ages
gathered, and from this point gradually narrows and becomes definite as it proceeds to unfold its true
interpretation, until at length, when Isaiah and Zechariah had spoken, the whole life and sufferings of
Jesus Christ had been written by anticipation.

For myself, I am a social optimist, simply because I am a Christian; because I am not willing to take up
the cry which the pessimist and the social cynic desire to put into my mouth. The sky is not black, but
bright with the Christmas star which announces the advent of a King, of a Ruler of men—Christ Jesus—
not reigning merely supreme in far?off splendour in the glory of the heavenly palaces, but King in England
to?day, by His Spirit inspiring, illuminating, transfiguring life, the great Companion, full of love and
sympathy for all the sorrows and sufferings of the poor, full of care and concern also for the wider good of
the commonweal—the Reformer, the Emancipator of the captive and of the oppressed, the Champion of
social right and the Inspirer of social duty. And I am a social optimist also because I am an Englishman;
because I believe in what Burke once called “the inbred integrity and piety of the English people”;
because it is bred into my very bone, as I expect it is bred into yours, that somehow with Englishmen
things cannot go permanently wrong, but are bound to worry through in the end.
1 [Note: C. W. Stubbs, Bishop
of Truro.]

It is an old commonplace of divinity, which we are strangely forgetting, that despair is the only utter
perdition; because despair binds a man in the prison of his own evil nature, and fastens the chain of the
evil spirit upon him; because all hope points upwards to God, and is the response of our spirit to His
Spirit. Therefore I say it again, we ought to stir up hope in every human being. Hope for present help from
God to overcome the sin that most easily besets him; hope that he shall be able to say to the mountain
which now stands in his way, “Remove, and be cast into the sea”; hope for the future that the glory of
God, the Deliverer, shall be fully revealed; and that he, being included in the “all flesh” of which the
prophet writes, bearing that nature in and for which Christ died, shall be able to see it and rejoice in
it.
2 [Note: F. D. Maurice, Sermons preached in Lincoln’s Inn Chapel, i. p. 164.]

1. What is the “straight” line to heaven? Far, far away is the eternal, electing love of God. The visible

starting?place is a sense of sin, and a sincere desire for pardon and peace with God. Next is a feeling of
forgiveness through the mercy of God by the blood and sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This leads on to peace.
And then peace runs into love. And love goes on into a new and holy life,—a life dedicate, a life loving, a
life of usefulness, a life for heaven. This line of life grows broader and broader as it goes on. And it also
grows humbler and humbler, till it is all Christ, and no self. And so it brings the traveller to heaven. And
not to stay there, but to go on, in the same line, straighter still, perfectly “straight,” for ever and ever! Thus
the “straight” line is—repentance, pardon, peace, love, holiness, usefulness, humility, heaven. Each runs
into the other; and they make one line.

“The rough places smooth!” Did it ever happen to you to know some very rough man, illiterate, coarse,
hard, who became a Christian? You saw, you could not help seeing, the wonderful change! How soft,
how gentle, how refined that hard man became. The whole being of that man was “smooth.” The “rough
places” were made “plain.” You may be perfectly conscious that there is much in yourself which is very
“rough”; much that grates and irritates; much that is most unlike your Master, and often very grievous to
yourself. “Rough” ways of speaking; “rough’ judgments; “rough” looks; “rough” actions. You regret them
afterwards. But the “roughness” is still there. It breaks out again. What shall you do? Think of the gentle
Jesus! Often have before your eyes His calm, holy, peaceful look. Cling to Him. Unite yourself to Him. Ask
Him to do it, and it will be done. He will make an Advent into your heart. And the more He comes, the
more certain is the result. He will bring quietness. He will make your “rough” places “smooth.” Or, it may
be thus: Perhaps there are many “roughnesses” now in your path; jars in daily life; “rough” persons with
whom you have to do; “rough” circumstances; “roughening” troubles; vexatious annoyances. The whole
discipline of life is “rough” to you! It is astonishing how Christ can, and will, turn those “rough” edges, if
you will ask Him! If He but throw in His calming presence, and pass over it all His smoothing hand, the
“rough” places will soon be “smooth”! The waters will soon settle down when He speaks “Peace”! Believe
it. It is in the covenant. “The rough places shall be made smooth.”
1 [Note: J. Vaughan, Sermons, Sept. 1881 to April
1882, p. 107.]

2. There are many advents of the Son of God, and for every one of them there is some forerunner, some
voice crying in the wilderness: “Prepare ye His way; make straight in the desert a highway for our God.”
His comings mark the great upward strides of humanity towards a nobler, freer, purer life; they are the
occasions when the bonds of the past are broken, and the world moves swiftly towards its Divine goal.
The greatest and most hopeful epochs of history have been those when the religious spirit, which is the
Spirit of God moving in the hearts of men, has been quickened and purified. The voice of some John the
Baptist has gone ringing through the wilderness of a dead faith, of a formal worship, of a worldly life, and
men have been startled into attention, have been made conscious of shortcomings and sins, have broken
up the fallow ground of their hearts, have sown to the Lord in righteousness, and have reaped the golden
harvest of a Divine spiritual life.

Let me remind you of three cardinal instances in which living sympathy has prepared the way for Christ’s
triumphal entry into the heart of a generation.

(1) Why was it that while other apostles presented Christ in other ways—as Messiah, as Judge, as
Healer—Paul determined to know nothing but Christ crucified? Not because His Gospel, as he calls it,
was the whole of the Divine message, but because the language of sacrifice was the common speech of
all mankind. Differing in all else, Jew and Greek, barbarian and Scythian, were one in this, that they
regarded sacrifice as the central means of grace. While other aspects of the Saviour might appeal to this
class or that nation, this one touched the springs which move the universal heart of humanity. And so it
was not James or Peter, but Paul, whose picture of the Christ won the homage of the world.

(2) In Italy, at the end of the twelfth century, Christian faith was all but extinct. So entirely were priests and
rulers given up to hatred and greed and luxury that the few humble communities which aimed at a purer
life were hunted as heretics. The mass of the people, despised, oppressed and corrupt, lived in one dumb
longing for pity. Then came an apostle who, from the storehouse of Christ’s words of power, drew that
which they needed—“Blessed are the poor!” When he claimed Poverty for his bride, Francis of Assisi
enacted a parable which all the poor could understand. To choose the life of poverty was to choose that
which bound the sad millions to each other. It was to proclaim himself the brother of all. It was to rob
poverty of its sting by making it a bond of love. The life and words of St. Francis are one long poem, in
which Christ is presented as the Lord of pity. From him men learned once more that the Kingdom of God
is the kingdom of love; once more they became its willing subjects; once more there was a Christian
Italy—a Christian Europe.

(3) But not for long. The glorious revival of the thirteenth century was followed by a long decay of faith
and morals. The Renaissance which restored the art and the learning of the ancient world, restored its
vices too. An ignorant and corrupt priesthood not only oppressed the people, but degraded them; for they
taught that all forms of secular life were profane, and none truly acceptable to God but their own celibate
idleness. In Southern lands laymen accepted their degradation, and religion became a mockery. But in
Germany, in Switzerland, in England, and wherever men had Teutonic blood in their veins, the old
German faith in personal value persisted. Outraged manhood led them to scorn the priests, and almost to
renounce the religion which was an excuse for the domination. Then God raised up an apostle from
among the labouring poor who could understand and convert them. Convert them not by condemning
their errors or denouncing their excesses, but by showing them that all their just claims were allowed and
satisfied by the ancient teaching of the Church. The doctrine of justification by faith, which Luther drew
from Paul’s forgotten writings, meant release from the tyranny of the Confessional, meant the recognition
of each man’s conscience, and the consecration of each man’s life.
1 [Note: M. G. Glazebrook, in The Church
Family Newspaper, March 24, 1910, p. 248.]

3. As the life of the Church of Christ is developed, as its organisation and its methods are kept simply as
instruments for the spirit of faith and love to work through, the Church will become less and less
dependent upon the zealous efforts of any man to inaugurate reforms and to lead onward movements.
The influence of the one man seems to correspond with the generally low and enslaved condition of the
mass of the people; great when the people are most needy; comparatively small when the people are
more free and more able to help themselves. John the Baptist is a unique, a commanding figure, because
the age in which he prophesied was so destitute of spiritual men. Martin Luther is an imposing presence
because, until he began to preach, the people, not having the knowledge of God and of His Christ, were
abject enough to bow down to a corrupt Church which they hated and despised. John Wesley and
George Whitefield stand out conspicuously from a mass of clergymen and ministers of the last century
because the Gospel was then so little known, ministers so rarely experienced its power, and the people
were in such gross darkness. I greatly doubt whether in our country such forerunners of the Kingdom of
God will appear again, simply because I think that the conditions of our Church life are so highly
favourable to upward movements springing from a general sense of need.
2 [Note: J. P. Gledstone, in Christian
World Pulpit, xxxiv. p. 183.]

It is wonderful to see how sensitive the Church of to?day has become to her condition, to her reputation,
and to her efficiency. If there is backsliding, there is always a reprover at hand; if there is a low standard
of attainment, there is always some one to urge her forward to higher graces; if there is inefficiency in any

department of service, there is always some active, enterprising spirit prepared to supply the lack and do
the necessary work. If one Church declines, another grows; if one denomination passes by any field of
usefulness, another steps in and occupies it. If the Churches at home were to prove unfaithful, they would
be rebuked and stimulated by those abroad. If the ministry becomes cold and formal, the Press utters the
complaints of the hungry, starving flock. So much work is now cast upon the Church, her enterprises have
carried her into so many lands, and require so many workers and such enormous revenues, that she can
maintain her ground only by a life of faith. Faith brought her into this goodly land, and by nothing but faith
can she retain it. Yet mere retention is not enough. She must make fresh advances; she lives by growth.
To stand still is to die. Thus is she continually cast upon God, and to be cast upon Him is to find His
faithfulness and truth.
1[Note: J. P. Gledstone, in Christian World Pulpit, xxxiv. p. 183.]

4. What the world requires most of all is a revelation of the glory of God. The material progress which we
have been describing is what many people mean when they speak of “the civilisation of the nineteenth
century,” and yet that which has lamentably failed to bless our own people is sometimes vaunted as the
best message we can send to the heathen. Many say, “Let our trade, and our railways, and all our
conveniences first find entrance to a heathen land, and then the people there will be prepared for the
Gospel.” A grosser delusion could hardly be promulgated. Our own social condition might show its fallacy,
and experiment in heathen lands has confirmed it. When Christianity has gone first (as to the South
Seas), morality, and contentment, and safety have been generated with a simple religious faith, whose
earnestness puts us to shame. But when this so?called “civilisation” has preceded Christianity, idolaters
have become atheists, and their last state is worse than their first. Now, as our text puts it, the great
object we Christians are to keep in view, in all our achievements and enterprises, is that “the glory of
God” may be revealed—not, you observe, the glory of man, not the glory of a society, not the glory of a
sect, but the glory of God. And what do we understand by that? Certainly no burst of light upon the world
such as that which overwhelmed Saul of Tarsus, nor any new and supernatural revelation, but a fulfilment
of the Saviour’s words about His disciples, “I am glorified in them.” As a king, a man finds his glory in the
contentment of his people; as a father, a man finds his glory in the well?being of his children; and so the
great King and Father of us all finds His “glory” in our contentment and well?being. And how can that be
brought about? It is by the work and words of those who speak “comfortably” to the sinners, who proclaim
a reconciled God revealed in Jesus Christ, who declare to all who in penitence will accept it, that “iniquity
is pardoned,” and that it is possible for all flesh to see the salvation of God.
1 [Note: A. Rowland.]

We have produced, during the last fifty years, says Bishop Stubbs, agitators of the John the Baptist type,
from John Bright down to John Burns, and they have most of them done noble preparatory work; but we
have now to produce, if we can, and from the same classes, admirable administrators, who are quite a
different kind of people, a new order of men, a new religious order, shall I say?—men who, whilst
believing in the possibilities of democratic control, know how essential to efficient administration are all
the qualities which are of Christian character, justice, patience, hope, modesty, integrity, frankness, and
fellowship. We want, in fact, as great a change, it seems to me, in our conception of the essential
qualities which go to make an able public man, a vestry politician even, as Browning described in the
wonderful picture he gave of the true function of a poet, which he called, “How it strikes a Contemporary.”
Indeed, now I come to think of it, I am not sure that Browning’s poet is not quite the kind of man we want
for our county councillors and politicians. Do you remember Browning’s lines—

I only knew one poet in my life:

And this, or something like it, was his way.

You saw him up and down Valladolid,

A man of mark, to know next time you saw.



He walked and tapped the pavement with his cane,

Scenting the world, looking it full in the face.

He turned up, now, the alley by the church,

That leads nowhither; now, he breathed himself

On the main promenade just at the wrong time:

You’d come upon his scrutinising hat,

Making a peaked shade blacker than itself

Against the single window spared some house

Intact yet with its mouldered Moorish work,—

Or else surprise the ferrel of his stick

Trying the mortar’s temper ’tween the chinks

Of some new shop a?building, French and fine.

He stood and watched the cobbler at his trade.



He glanced o’er books on stalls with half an eye,

And fly?leaf ballads on the vendor’s string,

And broad?edge bold?print posters by the wall.

He took such cognisance of men and things,

If any beat a horse, you felt he saw;

If any cursed a woman, he took note;

Yet stared at nobody,—you stared at him,

And found, less to your pleasure than surprise,

He seemed to know you and expect as much.



The town’s true master if the town but knew!

We merely kept the governor for form,

While this man walked about and took account

Of all thought, said and acted, then went home,

And wrote it fully to our Lord the King. 
 
8. BI, “
The way of the Lord prepared 
I. 
THE JEWISH THEOCRACY. It is a favourite statement with those who seek to account for 
Christianity on entirely mundane principles, that Christ grew, as it were, out of His age. The age 
was waiting for some such Teacher, some such Gospel—and Teacher and Gospel came. Just as 
the wreck of the Roman Republic demanded a hand and brain like Caesar’s, and they appeared 
at the critical moment and reorganised the State, so the Great Preacher of the universal Gospel 
was called for by His times, and He came. There is something in the spirit of an age, we are told, 
which creates the heroes and teachers of the age. This is very interesting, and has a large 
measure of truth in it. Men of high genius are singularly sensitive to the influences around them, 
and are created while they create; but it is blankly impossible to account for Christ and 
Christianity by natural evolution, with the Jewish theocracy, a grand prophetic system which for 
nearly two thousand years looked unto and prophesied of the Messiah, standing in the way. 
There was existing for ages in the world, kept alive by marvellous interventions of a higher hand, 
a national community, whose function was distinctly, from first to last, to prepare the way for 
the Advent, for the Divine kingdom which was to rule over and to bless mankind. These Jews 
were set to bear witness of the reality of the Divine rule, and its necessity, if states were to be 
saved from chaos, and the whole world from wreck. There was a period, when Moses led them in 
the wilderness, when the theocracy came out with wonderful clearness. Then there was a period, 
under their kings, when, through their worldly conformity to the life of surrounding nations, the 
theocracy was obscured. But the captivity ended that conformity in sorrow and in shame. From 
the time of the captivity the idea of the theocracy was restored. The prophets are throughout its 
great witnesses. The expectation, as matter of history, grew intense as the Advent approached. 
The expectation of the Advent of a Being, a Person, who should fulfil the promise and the 
prophecy with which their national life and literature were charged; who should bring, what 
Christ has brought—a Gospel of salvation to the world. It is a wonderful feature of 
thepreparation, that just as the nation which exhibited the theocracy was dying away as a nation 
its belief in the theocracy grew more intense, and its witness grew more clear and impressive to 
the approaching Advent of the great world theocrat—the Christ. 

II. THE JEWISH DISPERSION. It was a very wonderful chain of providential agencies which, 
before the Advent, scattered that people, these witnesses so charged with the promise and the 
prophecy, through the civilised world. Up to the time of the captivity the Jews kept themselves 
in a kind of stem, or, as the heathen around them called it, a sullen isolation. They cherished the 
sense of a lofty superiority. But, after the captivity, they displayed a singular facility of 
dispersion, a happy art of settling and flourishing among the Gentile peoples, which makes them 
to this day, pace the Anglo-Saxon, the first settlers of the world. In every chief city of the empire 
which Alexander founded a colony of Jews was sure to be settled; and the same state of things 
afterwards obtained in the far wider empire of Rome. In order to appreciate the significance of 
this, you must estimate the utter confusion of human beliefs and ideas about Divine things and 
beings which had been the fruit of the Greek and Roman conquests. Neither Greek nor Roman 
had belief enough in his gods to impose them on the conquered nations; nor did they find 
anything Divine among the conquered nations which seemed better worth worshipping than 
their own. This confusion of religious ideas and systems and deities, none of which had power to 
emerge with absolute or even strong claims to belief, was profoundly detrimental to moral 
earnestness, and indeed to any high-toned belief about Divine things. There was an utter 
confusion and decay of faith. But here were communities settled among them who had an 
absolute and indestructible belief in their Revelation. They had a God to worship of whom they 
could give intelligible account. The Jews lived among the heathen in isolation still; but the 
isolation was visibly based on a religious faith, and on religious records. These Jews, scattered 
abroad, were witnesses everywhere of the reality and necessity of Divine revelation to, and 
Divine legislation for, man. They familiarised men with the ideas which Christianity proclaimed, 
and on which it rested its authoritative claim to the homage and the obedience of mankind. 
III. THERE WAS A VERY REMARKABLE CHANGE WITHIN THE BOSOM  OF HEATHEN 
SOCIETY ITSELF, IN ITS INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL IDEAS , WHICH NOT ONLY 
OPENED THE WAY FOR THE TRUTH OF CHRISTIANITY, BUT SE EMED TO DEMAND 
SOME SUCH REVELATION OF TRUTH TO MANKIND. Students  of philosophy note a very 
decided progress between the age of Socrates and the age of Seneca in the consideration of 
questions bearing on man’s individual life and destiny. The supreme interest of a man’s life in 
the golden age of Greek philosophy lay in his relations, as a member of a society, as a citizen of a 
State. Within the little circle of Athenian society men realised a closeness of relation to each 
other, which made the State something of a household. The conquests of Alexander created an 
entirely new order of things. The Greek became, not the citizen of a State almost domestic in its 
magnitude and character, but the subject of a great Empire, lost in an undistinguished mass of 
fellow-subjects, and quite cut adrift from the landmarks and the moorings by which he had been 
wont to steer and stay his life. The Greek must think about himself and his world, and Alexander 
led him out into a world too big for him, which oppressed and distracted him, and overthrew all 
the traditions of his schools. It was a world, too, of ceaseless conflict and change. The state of the 
Greek world between Alexander’s conquests and the establishment of Roman supremacy, say, 
roughly, two hundred years, was such as to throw the thinker back upon himself, to lead him to 
realise his individual responsibility, to force on him the question, “What, after all, am I? Whence 
did I come? For what am I here? Whither do I tend? I am in a world full of confusion and 
misery—how am I to regulate my life, so that my happiness may not become a wreck?” So the 
great thinkers increasingly concerned themselves with questions which had to do with the 
individual man, his duty, his responsiblilty, his destiny, his means of arming himself for the 
battle of life, his means of saving himself from utter and hopeless loss. Thus there was a growing 
tendency in men to consider very much the question which Christianity came to treat of as 
salvation. The thoughts of man, the longings and aspirations of man, seem to be led up step by 
step to the point in which the cry, “Lord, save, or I perish!” was ready, did he but know all the 
meaning of his dumb pain, to fashion itself on his lips. All was waiting for the proclamation, 
“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because He hath anointed me to preach the Gospel to the 

poor,” etc. When men went abroad and proclaimed the Advent of a Saviour, they found a ready 
entrance to the world’s sad, wistful heart. 
IV. THE ROMAN EMPIRE. Incomparably the most important secular herald of the Advent was 
the Empire—an Empire under whose sceptre such a decree could go forth (Luk_2:1). There are 
many points of view from which the Empire may be regarded as the herald of the kingdom 
which was destined to master it, and found on it the edifice of Christian society. We are working 
and building on the foundations of the Empire still. The whole of modern European society is 
but the fully developed Empire of Rome. It is the centre of the secular, as the Advent of Christ is 
the centre of the spiritual, history of mankind. I might say much about the universal peace, 
which made the preaching of a universal Gospel possible. About the universal law and language, 
which made the career of the preachers, at any rate, far easier and more rapid than it could have 
been in any previous state of society. The fundamental question opened by the Empire is also a 
fundamental question of Christianity, the relation of men to each other. Is it enmity? is it 
brotherhood? Is the struggle for existence the ruling principle of progress, or brotherly 
sympathy, care, and love? The state of natural enmity and constant war gave way to a state in 
which peace, good-fellowship, and mutual ministries were regarded as the natural condition of 
society. Briton and Egyptian, Syrian and Spaniard, formed together a great political unity; and 
were drawn into bonds of relation to each other, the nature and bearings of which men were 
eager to explore. There rose on the minds of men the idea of human brotherhood. Men began to 
speculate about a common good in which civilised humanity was to share, and a duty of the 
whole human community to its weaker members, its sick, its poor, its wretched. Men wanted to 
know why and how they were brethren, why and how they were to love. And so arose perhaps 
the greatest herald of the Advent in secular society, the longing for a kingdom which should 
fulfil the promise which Rome in the nature of things was constantly breaking; and give peace, 
concord, love to a distracted world. Thus the way was prepared, the highway through the desert 
was made. (J. B. Brown, B. A.) 
 
 
The Divine glory revealed in Christ 
I. ITS LITERAL ACCOMPLISHMENT. 
1. In the appearance of John the Baptist. Ages rolled away, and no such preparing voice was 
heard in the desert of Judea. But it was at length heard. 
2. Following the footsteps of the servant, comes the Master. And as John had said, “Prepare 
ye the way of the Lord,” then was the glory of God manifested; and all flesh, living at that 
time in Judea, saw it together: the glory of God in human nature. Jesus Christ was the visible 
image of the glory of God all the time He was on earth. The visible image— 
(1) Of the power of God. His works were Divine; His word was power. See His power 
over the elements. 
(2) Of the truth of God. The doctrine of Christ has brought us nearer to the unclouded 
truth of the Divine mind than men were ever brought before. 
(3) Of the holiness of God; and that even while He was man upon earth. 
(4) Of the justice of God. Though this is not so frequently adverted to as other attributes, 
yet it is important. Why did Christ die so willingly? If, then, the glory of God was 
revealed even in the lowliness and sufferings of the Saviour, I ask if the coming of Christ 
had not in it more real pomp than if He had come with all the grandeur of an Eastern 
monarch, to a people who waited for Him? 

II. ITS SPIRITUAL ACCOMPLISHMENT. This is seen in the manifestation of Christ to the 
hearts of men. In this there is both preparation and manifestation; for Christ, in mercy, no more 
bursts upon the soul at once than He did upon the world; He sends His messenger to prepare 
the way before Him; this is the first part of the process. That preparing herald, figured by John 
the Baptist, is repentance. Consider what repentance is, and you will see how it prepares the soul 
for Christ, for pardon, happiness, and purity. 
1. The first element is a deep and serious conviction of the fact of our sin. For if we justify 
ourselves, there will be no preparation. 
2. The second element is a conviction of the extreme danger of sin and its infinite desert. 
3. The third element is a burdened and disquieted spirit. This supposes a feeling that we are 
not able to deliver ourselves. The way of the Lord is then plain; all obstructions are removed 
when we come to this; for all true repentance, like the preaching of John the Baptist, 
concludes by saying, “Behold the Lamb of God!” It is here alone that we see the glory of God. 
For what is the happiness of a pardoned soul, but one of the brightest manifestations of the 
glory of God upon earth? Here is a visible manifestation of the glory of the Divine patience; 
that man, amidst all his repeated provocations, should at last be saved and made happy. The 
glory of the grace of God! What a comment on the words of the apostle, “By grace are ye 
saved!” And then, see the glory of that working of the Divine power by which the soul is 
finally brought into the enjoyment of all the mind that was in Christ; the soul changing from 
glory to glory, and the work completed by an abundant entrance into the everlasting 
kingdom. This is the manifestation of Christ to the soul. 
III. ITS ALLEGORICAL ACCOMPLISHMENT. It is seen in the establishment of Christ’s 
kingdom upon earth. He sends forth His heralds. It is by the ministry of His Gospel that His 
dominion is established. The doctrine to be preached is that of repentance. So St. Paul preached 
at Athens. The manifestation of the master follows. Here is a manifestation of the glory of the 
heavenly wisdom, raising, exalting, and purifying the human intellect; of the Divine 
righteousness, putting a stop to all cruelty and injury. The glory of peace and harmony; the 
union of man’s heart to man, the extinction of external wars, and the diffusion of internal 
harmony. The glory of that order among families, and societies, and nations, preserved, and 
sanctified, and so regulated that no part infringes on the other, but the whole proceeds 
harmoniously, like a piece of sound mechanism. The glory of mercy and charity: teaching men to 
remember those that are in afflictions, as being themselves in like manner afflicted. This is a 
glory peculiar to the Christian revelation. (R. Watson.) 
 
 
Preparation for the Advent Messiah 
A positive preparation of the race itself was necessary, before the plan of redemption could be 
successfully revealed. This preparation was gradually going forward at the same time that our 
moral helplessness was so amply illustrated. If we reflect upon the nature of the Christian 
revelation we shall be convinced that its conceptions belong to an advanced period of 
civilisation. It addresses itself exclusively to the spiritual nature of man. But, in the earlier 
periods of our race, our conceptions are all from without; they have to do almost exclusively with 
sensible objects. The Gospel has to do with thought, feeling, sentiment, motive, and all their 
various attributes; and it could not be well understood until the mind of man had become 
somewhat at home in these conceptions. Nor is this all. The Christian religion addresses itself to 
the moral nature, the conscience of man. 
I. Hence, a remedial dispensation would naturally be delayed, until the moral character of man, 
both individual and social, had been fully displayed; and MANKIND HAD BECOME IN SOME 

DEGREE CAPABLE OF APPRECIATING THE FACTS THUS PRESENT ED TO THEIR NOTICE. 
But, besides this, the Gospel is a revelation communicated to man by language, and its 
authenticity, as is meet, is attested by miracles. Now, considerable progress must have been 
made in civilisation before such testimony could be given as we would be willing to receive on a 
question of so vital importance. Until the laws of nature are to some extent known, we cannot 
determine whether the Creator has or has not in a particular case departed from them. And this 
leads us to observe, again, that a revelation from God to man, informing him of this wonderful 
change in the conditions of his probation,—a revelation designed for all ages to the end of time, 
and destined towork a perfect transformation in the moral character of our race,—could not 
have been completed until language had arrived at a considerable degree of perfection. It was 
necessary that the doctrines and motives peculiar to the new dispensation should be 
promulgated with all possible explicitness, and yet guarded from all tendency either to 
incompleteness or excess. Amidst all the agitations of society, throughout all the overturnings of 
empire, the human mind, during this long period, had been gradually attaining maturity. Each 
nation, during its brief existence, had either added something to the stock of human knowledge, 
or made some contribution to the materials for human thought. Every revolution had illustrated 
in some new phase the principles of conduct, and had bequeathed the lesson to succeeding 
generations. 
II. We see, then, that God not only prepared a language in which this revelation for all coming 
ages could, be written, but HE DIFFUSED THAT LANGUAGE OVER THE CIVILISED WORLD. 
He created a suitable vehicle for the truth, and He made that vehicle, as far as was necessary, 
universal. And this work was accomplished by means of the ambition of Alexander, and the all-
grasping love of dominion of the citizens of Rome. Men ignorant of the existence and character 
of the true God, bowing down to the senseless images which their own hands had fashioned, 
indulging without restraint their own corrupt passions, were thus advancing His purposes, and 
opening the way for the advent of His Son. 
III. 
One other condition remains yet to be observed. 
The nations inhabiting the shores of the Mediterranean were originally distinct in 
government, dissimilar in origin, diverse in laws, habits, and usages, and almost 
perpetually at war. 
To pass from one to the other without incurring the risk of injury, nay, even of 
being sold into slavery, was almost impossible. 
A stranger and an enemy were designated by the same  word. 
It was necessary that these various peoples should all be moulded into one 
common form; that one system of laws should bind th em all in harmony. This 
seems to have been needful, in order that the new religion might be rapidly and 
extensively promulgated. In order to accomplish this purpose WAS THE ROMAN EMPIRE 
RAISED UP, AND ENTRUSTED WITH THE SCEPTRE OF UNIVERSA L DOMINION. In many 
respects it resembled the dominion of Great Britain at the present day in Asia. We perceive that 
the overturnings of forty centuries were required in order to prepare the world for the advent of 
the Messiah. The same omniscient wisdom has ever since been engaged in carrying forward the 
work which was then commenced. (D. Wayland, LL. D.) 
 
 
Vox clamantis 

It were surely a vain thing for a voice to cry in the wilderness where none can hear but the 
startled wild animals; where there are no sympathetic human hearts that can thrill with its 
message. But we must remember that of old the wilderness had a strange, weird attraction for 
many who aspired to live a holy life. And other souls who had similar longings, but did not 
possess the means or the courage to gratify them, would resort to the hermit of the wilderness 
for counsel and benediction. 
1. The metaphor, so wild and striking, of a voice crying in the wilderness, is as appropriate as 
metaphor could be for representing the man of God who, in a degenerate age, lifts up his 
voice to declare the truth, to reprove sin, to call men to a new life. Rocks are not harder than 
hearts sometimes; the wandering blustering winds are not more inattentive to the speaker’s 
message than are some souls. To a divinely taught spirit nothing is so truly a desert as the 
crowded city. To him it is lonely, forbidding, sad, yet mightily attractive, awakening his 
tenderest compassions, calling forth his mightiest and most patient exertions. 
2. Now that it has been done, we probably fall into the way of thinking that nothing was 
easier than for John the Baptist to preach to the Jews of the time of Herod, or for our Lord to 
open His mission to the same people, or for Paul to preach Christ at Corinth and Athens and 
Rome. How different the reality! Could any one of the inhabitants of these places have been 
consulted by God’s messenger beforehand he would probably have said: “Do you think that 
these cavilling, disputing doctors and philosophers will ever give credence to such stories as 
you bring? Do you think that these pleasure-loving people will ever wear the yoke of such an 
austere religion of self-sacrifice as you proclaim? Go home to your ordinary work again, and 
don’t trouble yourself to speak a message which nobody will hear; or if you cannot be at 
peace unless you say something about it, then go into the desert and speak it to yourself and 
to nature; for your chances of succeeding will be as great there as anywhere.” Strange all this, 
yet more strange the fact that it is the wilderness and the solitary place which shall rejoice 
and be glad for the messenger of God who comes to prepare Messiah’s way. The unlikely 
ground yields the harvest; they that are afar off come nigh. The voice in the wilderness is 
that of a herald announcing that a Greater One is on His way; be ye ready to receive Him. 
Widespread, radical, and lasting reformation was not achieved through the word of the 
Baptist; but such souls as could be prepared for the coming of the Lamb of God were 
aroused, called, separated from the hardened and worldly and unbelieving, and placed under 
discipline and teaching. From among their number our Lord chose His first disciples and 
chief apostles. Beyond the fringe of that little company which kept close to the Baptist 
something of good also was done. A wave of spiritual feeling passed over a great part of the 
nation; Jerusalem was greatly excited, if not savingly renewed. A general condition of desire 
was produced. 
3. There are many advents of the Son of God, and for every one of them there is some 
forerunner, some voice crying in the wilderness: “Prepare ye His way; make straight in the 
desert a highway for our God.” The voice of some John the Baptist has gone ringing through 
the wilderness of a dead faith, of a formal worship, of a worldly life, and men have been 
startled into attention, have been made conscious of shortcomings and sins. And although 
God never ceases to work among men, yet we come on barren dreary years of history, a very 
desert, when the signs of the Divine working are not apparent. Then arises some John the 
Baptist, or a general sense of dissatisfaction pervades the Churches, a sense of shortcoming 
and of shame, and the obstructions to a Divine manifestation are swept out of the way. 
Hardly a decade passes now without a cry arising from the Churches themselves: “Prepare 
the way of the Lord; make His paths straight.” Their conscience becomes increasingly quick 
and true; their ideal grows nobler; their conception of the Christian life assimilates to the 
standard given in the Word of God. And with attainment comes a longing for more, a sense 
of need, a craving for God. Then let us prepare His way, as we would that of a dear Friend 

whom we long to see, and whom we would not keep from us by any neglect or disrespect of 
ours. (J. P. Gledstone.) 
 
 
Prepare ye the way of the Lord 
I. GOD HAS MANY MESSENGERS, AND THEY HAVE OFTEN LIFTED  UP THEIR VOICE IN 
THE WILDERNESS. Some speak with a voice of thunder to arouse a sleeping world. The 
doctrine of others distils as the dew. Some open new paths to the seekers after wisdom: to others 
it is given to contend earnestly for the faith once delivered to the saints. Ever since man was 
driven from Eden he has been a wanderer in the desert. The thorn and the thistle around him 
are the emblems of the sin and the sorrow which spiritually mark his nomad state of existence. 
No wonder, then, that the wilderness is so often used as an emblem of this present life, in which 
you and I must listen to the voice of Heaven’s messengers. We want more law work. Our 
consciences are too easily satisfied. Modern religion is far too superficial. The law prepares for 
the Gospel. The Comforter must first convince of sin. 
II. ISAIAH USES IT AS AN ILLUSTRATION OF HIS OWN MINIST RY. He, too, living now 
probably in the idolatrous reign of Manasseh, felt himself in a spiritual desert. Yet by faith he 
sees afar off, and the seer is himself transported into that bright future. Already foreseeing the 
seventy years’ captivity of Judah, and then the joyful return of the exiles under the decree of 
Cyrus, Isaiah writes of these events as if himself living and acting among them. Yea more, he 
pictures the dawn of the day as ushered in by that return from Babylon. 
III. THE TRANSITION IS EASY TO THE PERSONAL TIMES OF THE  MESSIAH, AND OF HIS 
HERALD, JOHN THE BAPTIST. The homely and heart-searching appeals of the Baptist proved 
him to be the pioneer of the righteous King. Before this wilderness preacher the mountains of 
Pharisaic pride were levelled, the valleys of Sadducean unbelief were filled up, the tortuous vices 
of the courtly Judaean were corrected, and the rude ignorance of the Galilean smoothed and 
reformed. 
IV. But even in this day THE WORDS HAD A WIDER SIGNIFICATION. Not only the land of 
Israel, but the Gentile world, even “all flesh,” was then being prepared “to see the salvation of 
God.” The former was accomplished by John’s own preaching; of the latter he was only the 
herald. Providential agencies were even then at work preparing Christ’s way among the Gentiles. 
1. At the time when our Saviour was born the knowledge of the Greek language had spread 
more widely throughout Asia and Europe than has since been the case with any other 
tongue. What a preparation was this for the spread of the Christian religion. We know that 
there is no greater harrier separating nations than a difference of language. But at the very 
period when Christianity began to be published it found one language generally read and 
understood from the Alps to the Caucasus; and so the Septuagint Version of the Old 
Testament could now travel, with the gospels and epistles, to the many provinces of the 
Roman Empire; for the valleys had been exalted, and the mountains and hills made low. 
2. A second preparation designed by God’s providence was—the extent of Roman dominion. 
The chief means employed by that great Empire for consolidating her possessions were her 
roads and her laws. 
(1) It was literally true that, owing to Roman dominion, both in Europe and Asia, the 
crooked had been made straight and the rough places plain. That sagacious people 
recognised the civilising power of good roads through their Empire just as we do now of 
railways in our Indian and other colonies. 

(2) It is the province of law to rectify abuses and remove difficulties: and to effect this 
among the nations Rome ever felt to be her mission. Wherever she planted her colonies 
she invited all people to share her privileges, and to dwell in safety under the aegis of her 
laws. Was not this, then, a moral via strata made for the spread of Christianity? 
V. HOW THIS PROPHECY SHEDS A LUSTRE ON THE WORLD’S FUTU RE. Once more in this 
wide desert “the glory of the Lord shall be revealed,” and not “one,” but “all lands shall see it 
together.” Yes, He who ascended into heaven shall so come again. Are we ready for that day? Are 
we making others ready? I believe that every Christian should be as the “voice of him that crieth 
in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make straight in the desert a highway for our 
God.” The true Church, in short, must remain in the desert until the mystic “times” are fulfilled. 
She is to be “the voice of one crying in the wilderness.” Meanwhile the voice of prophecy is given 
to cheer her amidst trial and disappointment. We labour for years to tunnel through the Alps: 
shall we not labour patiently to prepare the way of the Lord? (S. P. Jose, M. A.) 
 
 
Prepare ye the way of the Lord 
I. THERE ARE CERTAIN THINGS WHICH HINDER THE SPREAD OF  THE REDEEMER’S 
KINGDOM, spoken of here as valleys, hills, etc. Heathenism abroad: ignorance and vice at 
home. Intemperance hinders the progress of God’s kingdom on every hand. 
1. Intemperance hinders the progress of God’s kingdom at home. Our country is occupied by 
three armies—an army of paupers, an army of criminals, and an army of police, to stand 
between the vicious and the virtuous, and protect the latter from the assaults of the former. 
How is this? There is this huge evil established amongst us, which casts its dread shadow 
over everything that is lovely and of good report. Where, e.g., are the working men of 
England to be found to-day? Not in the house of prayer. In the case of many of them, they 
have no suitable clothes; but why is this? Because wages are low? Because trade is bad? I 
answer, because the money is carried to the public-house, and is thus worse than wasted. 
There are some who go many times, perhaps regularly, to the house of God, and yet are not 
saved. Why? The grand neutraliser of the Gospel is the habit of drinking intoxicating liquors. 
2. It is also a hindrance to the spread of the Gospel abroad. 
(1) They tell us that we cannot, as Christians, take possession of the world, because we 
have not the means. Is it a truth that England, the richest land upon earth, made rich too 
by her Christianity, has done what she could for Him who redeemed her when she gives 
eightpence per head for the conversion of the world? Is it so? Alas! no; for while we have 
done this, we have spent £4 per head on strong drink. 
(2) They say the world is not converted because we have not the men—especially 
suitable men. How is this? There are men to be found for everything else. One reason is, 
that the drinking customs have done much to enervate the Church. Strong drink aims 
high. It aims at the men of active brain and warm heart. 
(3) Then there is the third reason—want of success. There are European barriers that are 
much stronger than heathenism and idolatry. The missionary tells us, over and over 
again, that he is far more afraid of English drinking than of native idolatry. 
II. IT IS THE DUTY OF THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH TO SWEEP THIS  ENEMY AWAY. God has 
decreed that these mountains shall perish. 
1. The Church can remove this mountain. Look at her power as a teacher. Are not the 
children of our country in her hands? Look at the political power which she possesses. Is 

there an election in which the Christian Church cannot turn the balance? She has not only 
the ordinary power which men have, but she has omnipotence at her command. 
2. The Church must, if she would hold her own. If we are not assailing strong drink, it is 
assailing us. 
3. The Church must, if she would please her Master. How are we to proceed? Abstinence 
first; then entire prohibition of the traffic. 
III. THE GLORIOUS RESULT. (C. Garrett.) 
 
 
Preparing the way of the Lord 
I. THE ADVENT IMPLIED. “Prepare ye the way of the Lord.” 
1. The Lord here spoken of is doubtless the supreme Jehovah; and from the appropriation of 
the passage by inspired authority to Christ, I apprehend nothing less can be intended than to 
intimate that He who was coming was the true God and eternal Life. This was that 
Immanuel who was to bring in an everlasting righteousness, to redeem and restore the Israel 
of God, and accomplish salvation for all the ends of the earth. Let us, then, inquire, Is this 
interpretation of the passage justified by other scriptures, and especially by the event itself? 
Assuredly He came with all the signs and demonstrations of incarnate Deity. He Himself laid 
express claim to this high character, and most manifestly displayed the perfections which it 
involves. With these sublime views of His character agrees the testimony of all His inspired 
apostles. 
2. The disciples of John were required to contemplate here the true Messiah coming to effect 
salvation, to fulfil all the promises made of old to their fathers. It is, therefore, of great 
interest and importance to ascertain what was involved in that character, and what was the 
work assigned Him to do. It is expressly declared that He came to do the will of God,—to 
magnify the law and make it honourable,—to render to it a perfect obedience, and make 
reconciliation for iniquity. 
3. The way of the Lord to us must be understood of His approach to our consciences and 
hearts by His word and spirit. 
II. The charge to “prepare the way of the Lord” implies that there ARE DIFFICULTIES OR 
OBSTACLES IN HIS WAY. 
1. There is the pride and self-righteousness of the human heart, 
2. The heart is by nature hard and impenitent, blinded to its own defects, and, even after the 
confession of them, unwilling to have them condemned or to give them up. 
3. The state of human desires and affections presents other and formidable obstacles to the 
claims of the Lord. Their desires are low—their affections carnal. The poor grovelling heart 
must be raised to noble and exalted ends and aims. 
4. In some there exists a mass of prejudice, and the truth of Christ is viewed under a false 
light, or through a perverting medium. They will not receive the kingdom of God as a little 
child, and they cannot enter therein. Some are prejudiced against the authority of 
revelation—some against the mysteries of godliness—some against the doctrines of grace or 
salvation by the merit of another; and many dislike the holiness, the self-denial, the 
separation from the world which Christianity inculcates. 
5. Repentance is necessary to prepare the way; humility, to receive and learn the doctrine; 
prayer, to give it success in the heart; and watchfulness, to carry it out into practice. Every 

one who is himself a disciple of the Lord, has something to do in preparing the way of Christ 
in the earth. (G. Redford, LL. D.) 
 
 
The road maker  
(with Mattheew 3:3):—To the writers of the Gospel story this vivid expression seems to have 
commended itself as peculiarly applicable to the Baptist. He came heralding the speedy advent 
of the Messiah, and his life and ministry were a preparation for the greater life and more potent 
ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. In all essentials that task still remains to be performed. The 
modern road maker—the herald and hastener of a better and holier day—must be 
distinguished— 
I. BY A PROFOUND SENSE OF THE EVIL OF THE PRESENT. The p rophet was no blind 
optimist cherishing a foolish hope of a happier future because he did not see the abounding evils 
around him. He saw with clear, penetrating eyes the moral and spiritual degradation of his 
nation and day. He speaks of it, ay, and of the national evils which must issue from it—exile, 
defeat, the overthrow of their beautiful city. That is true of the prophetic band from first to last—
from Elijah to John. The man who deliberately closes his eyes to the evils of his day, or seeing 
them minimises their importance, or in thought disguises them by some euphonious phrase, will 
never—let his life be prolonged to beyond the age of the patriarchs—prepare the way of the Lord. 
Too many of us live in an imaginary world as different as possible from the world of stern fact. 
The men who do most in their own generation to make a way for a better day in the future are 
usually the men who see clearly one wrong which needs righting, one obstacle which needs 
removing, one lie which needs refuting, and give themselves to the doing of that one thing—e.g., 
Wilberforce and slavery, Wesley and Evangelism, Cobden and Free Trade, Booth and the 
submerged tenth. One word of warning. To look fearlessly at the evils of your own day is not 
without danger. Not until that Voice which speaks of comfort through forgiveness has been 
heard and welcomed does the call come which bids hands and feet and active will prepare the 
way of the Lord. 
II. BY AN UNQUENCHABLE FAITH IN THE FUTURE. The road ma ker is an optimist because 
he is a man of faith. There is an optimism which is both foolish and unfounded. But if the 
optimist has first looked facts in the face, and then rises by sheer force of faith in God above all 
that contradicts his hope, his optimism is not a vice, but a shining and beneficent virtue. Such 
was this prophet’s. So with John. He is certain, despite the manifold evils—moral and social—
that afflict his people, that the day of the Lord sanointed will be a glorious day—a day of great 
things; and he speaks of it and of Him whose shoe-latchet he is not worthy to unloose with an 
unbounded faith. “He must increase; I must decrease.” Note on what the road maker rests—not 
on man. “All flesh is grass; the grass withereth, the flower fadeth, but the Word of our God 
endureth for ever.” The people have God’s Word; when all their human leaders have fallen, and 
every visible authority for God is taken away, this shall be their rally and their confidence. 
III. BY HIS READINESS TO SERVE OR SUFFER. So Isaiah: so John. No good cause but has 
exacted its toll of both from heroic hearts that have espoused it. (W. H. Williams.) 
 
 
Comfort for the afflicted Church 
I. THE DESIGN OF THIS PROPHECY is to speak peace and comfort to an afflicted Church. Not 
only to the Jewish Church under a temporal captivity, but to every Christian Church, and every 
faithful soul. 

1. “Every valley shall be exalted.” As the way St. John was sent to prepare by repentance was 
in the hearts of men, this must express some change to be wrought in those hearts. And what 
does it proclaim, but that humility is the way to glory? 
2. “Every mountain and hill shall be made low.” As the lowly and fruitful valleys represent 
the meek and pious servants of Christ, so do the lofty and barren mountains point out to us 
the haughty and unprofitable children of this world that oppose Him. 
3. “The crooked shall be made straight.” This is a most essential part in a highway, the end 
and intent of which is, to lead those who travel in it directly to the place and city where they 
would be. Man, at his creation, was placed in the straight way to heaven and happiness. Had 
he kept the eyes of his faith steadily fixed upon it, and walked directly on in the path of God’s 
commandments, he had soon arrived at it. But he listened to the suggestions of the devil, 
who drew him out of it, pretending to show him a pleasanter and shorter road than that 
appointed. But no sooner was man a sinner than God was a Saviour. When the valley of 
humility is exalted by faith and the mountain of pride and self-sufficiency brought low in 
your hearts, the crooked shall instantly be made straight before you. 
4. “The rough places plain.” When the low ground is raised, the high levelled, and the whole 
marked out with a line and made straight, nothing remains but to clear away all 
obstructions. 
II. The words thus explained, what remains but that we APPLY THEM TO OURSELVES, FOR 
THE DIRECTION OF OUR PRACTICE? ( Bp. Horne.) 
 
 
Preparing the way of the Lord 
I. THE DUTY OF PREPARING THE WAY OF THE LORD. 
1. The herald. Allusion is here made to an ancient custom, according to which heralds were 
sent before to prepare the way for the monarch when he was about to march from one place 
to another. Christian ministers are the “voice” of God “crying in the wilderness.” The very 
circumstance of this voice being needed shows the disordered state of man by nature. It is 
not enough for ministers gently to remind men of their state and duty—they must “cry.” Very 
many are the souls that need to be thus roused. 
2. The scene of his labours—“the wilderness.” This is highly descriptive of the state of men in 
every age. A wilderness, a desert, indeed, is this world, while void of God’s grace; destitute of 
beauty, and unfruitful as to every good work. 
3. What is the work to which the herald calls? As far as we have it in our power, we are to aid 
in removing whatever hinders the reception of Christ in the world. What is it hinders the 
reception of Christ in our own hearts? The success of the messenger will ever depend upon 
his looking up to the Lord. 
II. OUR ENCOURAGEMENTS. 
1. Every difficulty, however formidable, shall be surmounted. For “every valley shall be 
exalted,” etc. What are the difficulties which present themselves? In the work of salvation 
there are two leading classes of impediments. 
(1) Internal. These are in every heart. There is much anxiety and depression: we are 
ready to imagine there is no hope; here are the valleys to be exalted. Some are puffed up 
with conceit of their own merit, and will not come to Christ; here are mountains to be 
made low. There are some untractable, obstinate passions; here are the roughnesses 
which are to be made plain. Who is sufficient for all this? None but the Lord alone. 

(2) External. In introducing the Gospel among the heathen there are many difficulties. 
2. There shall be an universal manifestation of the Divine glory. “The glory of the Lord shall 
be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together.” There was a great manifestation of the Divine 
glory when Cyrus and the foes of the Church were made the instruments of delivering God’s 
people from their captivity. Christians! this is not our work, or we should soon be dismayed. 
It is the way of the Lord. He is to work; He is to display His own glory. What tenderness and-
condescension has God shown! 
3. The certainty of all this. “For the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.” When one promises 
who can fulfil our wishes, we have all the encouragement we can possibly need. In no 
blindness of mistaken zeal, in no rashness of enthusiasm, yet with all holy boldness, let us 
labour to prepare the way of the Lord. (W. Williams.) 
 
 
The King’s highway 
I. VALLEYS MUST BE LEVELED UP. 
1. Inattention. 
(1) If we attend not to the Gospel message we can neither realise its importance nor 
secure its benefits. 
(2) Those who absent themselves from the house of God are indifferently prepared for 
the coming of the Lord. 
(3) So those who while there allow their minds to wander upon their merchandise, 
pleasures, etc., are ill prepared for the coming of the King. 
2. Apathy. 
(1) Thousands of professors of religion put forth little effort in the cause of God. 
(2) Begin with yourself. Make a stir among your neighbours. Begin now. 
3. Despondency. 
(1) There are those who are so affected with a sense of their sinfulness that they fear to 
trust in Christ for salvation. 
(2) Some professors take a morbid, gloomy view of the work of God. 
II. EMINENCES MUST BE LEVELLED DOWN. 
1. The mountain of pride must be reduced. 
(1) The pride that will not make full confession of sin. 
(2) The pride that will not receive the kingdom of heaven as a little child. 
(3) The pride of reason that will not accept salvation until its mysteries are 
comprehended. 
(4) The progress of Christ is also hindered by the worldly pride of professors. 
2. The mountain of presumption must be depressed. 
(1) Sinners are presumptuous when, without forsaking their sins, they attempt to believe 
for salvation. 

(2) Professors are presumptuous when they expect the work of God to revive in the 
Church without exerting themselves to promote a revival. 
(3) While we work as though everything depended upon working, we must trust as 
though everything depended upon trusting. 
3. The hills of ingratitude must be brought low. 
(1) Some are ostensibly so zealous for the conversion of sinners that they forget to thank 
God for the good He is bestowing. 
(2) There are others who will not rejoice when they hear good tidings of the work of God, 
because they are not themselves the subjects of that work. 
III. THE CROOKED PLACES MUST BE STRAIGHTENED. 
1. Prejudice. 
(1) Some object to the movements of the blessed Jesus because He comes too loudly. 
(2) Others complain because He comes too silently. 
(3) Some dislike them because “publicans and harlots” are getting converted. 
(4) Others find fault because the work of grace takes hold upon the better classes. 
(5) And there are those who disparage the work of God among the children because they 
are too young. Nothing pleases crooked prejudice. 
2. Jealousy. 
(1) It hears that sinners are converted, but is not pleased because the converts have 
joined other churches. 
(2) We may be anxious for the prosperity of God’s work for party purposes. 
(3) How admirable was the spirit of Paul, who rejoiced that Christ was preached, no 
matter by whom! 
3. Censoriousness. 
(1) None of us are so perfect that we can afford to be severely scrutinised. We should 
therefore endeavour to put the best construction upon each other’s conduct. 
(2) We should be especially careful not to impeach good men with want of zeal for God 
because they differ from us in judgment as to the best way to promote His work. 
4. Covetousness. 
(1) The acquisition of property is the one end for which some persons appear to exist. It 
is to no purpose to remind such persons that the world is perishing, and that the Church 
missions are languishing for want of funds 
(2) Can the God of benevolence bless a covetous Church? 
(3) The cure for covetousness is giving. 
IV. THE ROUGH PLACES MUST BE SMOOTHED. 
1. That ugly rock of Sabbath desecration must be removed. 
(1) God did not institute His day for our amusement. 
(2) It was not instituted to encourage idleness. It is separated from the toil of secular 
business. 

2. That rut of drunkenness must be filled up. 
3. Those sinks of immorality must be filled. Lying, cheating, oppression, uncleanness. 
4. The rough places of instability must be smoothed. 
(1) Like the chameleon, which takes the colour of every object on which it rests, there are 
those who never remain the same person for four-and-twenty hours. Treating Church 
membership as a coat that might be put on or off at pleasure. 
(2) At one moment they are all in a flame, the next moment they are cold as ice. 
Sometimes they appear like the oak, at other times like the reed that is shaken with the 
wind. 
(3) In the Church they are one thing, in the world another. Yet are they the noisiest 
fault-finders against the quiet, steady, unostentatious workers. (F. W.Macdonald, M. A.) 
 
 
Preparing the way of the Lord  
(with Luk_3:10-14):— 
I. EXTERNAL PREPARATION ( Isa_40:3-5). Our King has notified usthat He wants to encircle 
this world with His glory, and we are the pioneers to make way for His chariot. Let me indicate a 
few things about this work if you are going to make it a grand success. 
1. There must be a willingness to undertake it. Indifference will kill the enterprise. 
Difficulties will appear; there must be courage and a cool head to guide a brave heart. Three 
things must be prominent— 
(1) Regularity of effort. 
(2) A desire to find one’s own particular work. 
(3) Surrender to the guidance of the Spirit. 
2. There must be an appreciation of the importance of the work. If the King has given an 
order, there must be some reason for it; and when the carrying out of that order involves 
careful planning and difficult execution we must infer the importance of the result, and 
hence of the preparation. 
(1) Cutting down forests. What are the dead trees in the way? Apostate Christians. They 
lie right across the King’s track, and He has to rein up until somebody removes them. 
What are the strong, sturdy, even luxuriant trees on the way? Worldly Christians. 
(2) Levelling the hills. Pride is a high hill. Unbelief is a considerable mountain. Criticism 
is a rocky mound. 
(3) Filling up the hollows. Oh, the deficiencies in the Church to make up! 
II. INTERNAL PREPARATION ( Luk_3:10-14). Every pioneer of the coming King must observe 
these demands. 
1. Generosity. A niggardly nature is too narrow quarters for the Lord to dwell in. 
2. Justice. 
3. Peaceableness. It was the soldier’s duty to fight, but only when necessary, and only to 
secure peace. The ultimate aim of justifiable war is always peace. When you have got the way 
all prepared, you will find that it is— 

(1) A highway for the King. 
(2) A way of blessing for His subjects. 
(3) A way beginning with a cross and ending with a crown. (W. H. G. Temple.) 
 
 
A great work requires preparation 
There is a lesson which man is taught in many ways, but which he is very slow to learn. It is the 
necessity of preparation before any great work can be taken in hand and brought to a prosperous 
end. Before men begin to build, they must dig the foundation. Before they reap the harvest they 
must sow the seed and prepare the soil. The truth is an elementary one and yet through neglect 
of it, many a good work has failed, many an earnest worker has despaired. And the greater and 
more lasting the work, the longer and deeper the preparation must be. Things which shoot up 
quickly, quickly pass away. A tree does not spring up in a night. A nation is not born in a day. 
History shows us the long period of conception, and the painful period of travail, before great 
ideas can be brought to the birth and great changes can be wrought in the political world. 
Geology again teaches us the countless number of the ages of preparation in which this earth 
was fitted to be the home of man. (F. Watson, M. A.) 
 
 
Preparation for the coming of Christ 
There is one event in the world’s history which by every Christian must be admitted to be 
unique, alike in itself and in its consequences. The coming of God in the flesh, bringing life to a 
dying world, light to a dark world, peace to a world at enmity with God, may find its types and 
shadows, but it can find no parallels amongst other historical facts. There had been comings of 
great men, but never the coming of the great God. There had been revelations of truth, but now 
the Truth Himself was revealed. Great kingdoms had been set up quickly to pass away, but now 
the world-wide eternal kingdom was established. We may call it a crisis in history; indeed it was. 
It was the crisis, the turning-point in the history of the world, the turning-power in the history of 
each individual man. We may describe it in its results as a re-creation, but even that word is 
inadequate, unless it means much more than a restoration of the old creation to its original 
beauty and perfection. The preparation for this unique event, how can we exaggerate its 
importance! So much preparation was needed for any one of the ages; how much more for that 
which is described as the fulness of them all! So many agencies were set at work to fit this world 
to be the home of man; how can we overestimate the preliminary work by which men were 
prepared to be the home of God? (F. Watson, M. A.) 
 
 
The gnostic gospel 
It is well worthy of notice that almost the earliest heresy with which the Church battled was one 
which denied the reality of this preparation. A fundamental gnostic doctrine was the suddenness 
of the appearance of the Christ in human fashion. There was indeed a preparation, a 
development, so to speak, of the Supreme Being before He could stoop so low as earth. But there 
was no preparation of man for the reception of his God. Suddenly, at the time of His baptism, 
the Christ appeared in human form upon the earth. His human nature, or human body, if indeed 
it could be called human, had no previous history. It did not grow like ours. It could not trace its 
origin from the parents of the race like ours. It was an instrument which the heavenly Christ 
took to Himself for His work, and which He flung away when He had no further use for it. Thus 
teaching, the gnostics cut off the Christ from all the men before or after Him. They were not 

bone of His bone, or flesh of His flesh. Thus was denied all preparation of the human nature by 
which the Saviour of men worked. And the world into which He came, it also had not been 
prepared for His coming. If the supreme spiritual God bad in any way come in contact with this 
material world, it had been by accident; nay, rather by mishap. In this world of ours God had not 
been the king, and never could be king. With this human nature of ours, God had not been and 
never could be united. The Christ did not come to give this earth, in their fulness, truths of 
which He had already vouchsafed us foretastes, but He came to deprive us of a higher life, which 
had unawares come in contact with material bodies, and had been contaminated by them. 
Instead of light struggling with the darkness to subdue it, the gnostics imagined light struggling 
in the darkness to escape from it. If fuller light was revealed by their Christ, it was only that He 
might gather up the stray light lost from heaven and take it for ever away. This is the gnostic 
gospel. This is the gospel without the Old Testament. This is the gospel without preparation of 
the Man Christ or man’s world. Not such the teaching of the Church. She has taught us to regard 
the history of the world as the unfolding of the great plan by which God would gather all nations 
and peoples to Himself. (F. Watson, M. A.) 
 
 
Preparation among the heathen for the reception of Christianity 
This preparation is not to be regarded as confined to the chosen people of Israel. It is true, 
“Darkness covered the earth, and gross darkness the peoples.” But even darkness, thick 
darkness, may be preparatory to light. It was so at the creation of the world. It is so in everyday 
experience. If we believe, as believe we must, that man was created with capacities for 
comprehending the light; if we believe that in his pure and unfallen state it was natural for him 
to love the light; if we believe that his higher nature is never wholly lost: then we must confess 
that the very darkness in its depth and grossness must have caused longings deep and vast. 
When men groped in the darkness, and missed their way, and felt they had missed it, they must 
have longed for the Day Star to arise and shine. They must have said, we were meant for 
something better than this. They must have hoped for happier times. “They sat in darkness and 
the shadow of death, being fast bound in misery and iron. They fell down, and there was none to 
help. Then they cried unto the Lord in their trouble, and He delivered them from their distress.” 
He in whose heart a longing for better things has arisen, albeit that longing may be indefinite 
and ill-directed, has not been left unprepared for receiving a gift from God. (F. Watson, M. A.) 
 
 
Israel’s preparation for the coming of Christ 
Beyond this general preparation of the nations there was also a special preparation of a 
particular people. We are entitled to argue this from the condition of that people when the 
Saviour appeared. You find that nation scattered all over the world; though in it, yet not of it. It 
was disliked and despised. It was persecuted and down-trodden. In most places it was a mere 
handful. In no place had it the supreme authority. Numbers, educated opinion, popular 
prejudice, and state power were all against it and its distinctiveness. Yet it was never crushed, 
and it was never absorbed; it never ceased to exert power and influence. Low as its fortunes then 
were, none of any nation were so proud of their history, none were more hopeful of their future. 
Indeed, it might be said, with some truth, that at that time the Jews alone had hope. The nations 
were groaning in their pains. Old institutions and old religions were worn out. Men’s hearts 
were failing them for fear, and for looking for those things which were coming upon the earth. 
The Jews alone hoped for the coming of new and better times. The Jews alone thought that the 
pains they were suffering were not pains of dissolution, but birth-pangs, the pains followed by 
new life and fresh joy. (F. Watson, M. A.) 

 
 
Vox clamantis 
The note of all times that are progressive is a note of urgency, preparation, advance. (J. Parker,
D. D.) 
 
 
The appealing “voice” 
Sometimes there is nothing to instruct us but a “voice.” We hear it, but cannot trace it. It is 
called the spirit of the times, the voice of the day, the genius of the hour. Sometimes it is 
personated in one man, one policy; at other times it is a diffused voice, coming, apparently to 
the ear, from all the points of the compass at once, but with singular unanimity, emphasis, 
truthfulness. It is never a voice of despair, or a tone that would cast the soul into dejection, but 
always like a clarion, or a chiming bell, or a father’s call, or a soldier’s resounding peal. (F.
Watson, M. A.) 
 
 
Make straight in the desert a highway for our God 
A highway in the wilderness 
We ought to read here, not “the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the 
Lord,” but rather, “the voice of one crying, Prepare ye in the wilderness the way of the Lord.” 
Now, “the voice of one crying in the wilderness”—if you read so—will have a sufficiently direct 
application to John Baptist and to few menbesides. But “the voice of one crying, Prepare a 
highway in the wilderness,” is no more exclusively applicable to him than to John Calvin or John 
Knox or John Ruskin. It is applicable to everybody who does anything for the world, especially 
in its waste places and its worst places, in the way of improvement. It is applicable to 
Copernicus, Bacon, James Watt. Above all, it is applicable to Christ Himself. It is an anticipation 
of better and still better times for all mankind. 
1. Does it matter at all to us who can have no hope of seeing it in our time, who have 
certainly, as it would seem, to live out our lives in a condition of things in which not so much 
the presence of improvement as the need of it is conspicuous? To this question, I think, there 
are two answers, both of which, for religious minds at any rate, have some weight. 
(1) Our idea of God, of a Divine order in the world, is very much our whole stock-in-
trade in the matter of religion. The question with us, as regards religion, is, how much we 
can see of God in what is not God, and in what seems opposed to God? Is that which we 
see of Him, though it must be little, yet enough to give us feeling, emotion, to fill our 
minds, not with a thousand anxieties and alarms about things clean and unclean, but to 
fill them to overflowing with reverence, all that constitutes the mysterious life of a spirit 
conversing with that unutterable Spirit behind the veil? Second to this even, though of 
infinite importance, is the question whether we shall devour widows’ houses and for a 
pretence make long prayers, or meditate upon the Good Samaritan, and go and do 
likewise. It obviously, then, concerns very much our idea of God, our experience of Him, 
what we see or feel of Him, our stock-in-trade in the matter of religion, what notion we 
form and entertain of the future destiny of mankind We know that the past has not been 
all that could be wished. Plenty of desert in that backward view. Will the future be 
better? Evidently that is a matter which must go to shape our idea of God, of a Divine 
order of the world. This is to look at the whole instead of a small part, and form some 

conclusion or other about the whole. It does matter a good deal to us, therefore, though 
we are not to live to see it, that, if it is possible or right to entertain it, we should 
entertain the belief that the endless ages that are yet to come will exhibit the Divine 
order as beneficent and beautiful in a way in which past ages and our own age have had 
scanty experience of it. 
(2) Another answer to the question, What does it matter to us what the future of 
mankind may be? is obviously this: It is not so much a duty as an instinct for man to live 
for posterity. We are all of one stock. With reference to this instinct and this satisfaction, 
the case is plain as regards the future being other and better than the past or the present. 
We have all something to do, and can do something for posterity. We have the conviction 
or the hope in doing this, that it is not going to be in vain. 
2. “Prepare ye in the wilderness a highway for our God.” In this, possibly, rather than in any 
other form, there comes the Divine call to those in every age, and especially in this age, to 
whom the Divine order is most of a reality and a power. Personal piety—you must have that, 
say the professors of ecclesiastical pedagogy—before entering upon this or that work, It is 
quite true: personal piety you must have to be fit to live, not to say to teach others or help 
others to live well. But if you have piety enough to have any satisfaction in helping to leave 
the world a little better than you have found it, then that is enough of a qualification and 
commission for taking part in work which will occupy your whole life. This general view of 
the Divine order and of the demands which it makes upon those who are most conscious of 
the reality of it suggests one or two reflections. 
(1) In regard to the fulfilment of the Divine order, it often happens that, while weaker 
agencies at work in forwarding it are recognised, greater ones, even the greatest of all, 
escape notice. Since the Divine order is not always clear, it must often happen, in the 
case of lives of good men and even great men devoted to the advancement of it, that 
efforts to advance it have other results than those who made them contemplated—great 
results which they did not expect, no results where they expected great results. 
(2) As it is often not the mightier but the weaker agencies at work in furthering the 
Divine order that are recognised and appreciated, so in the case of men who are more or 
less consciously devoted to the advancement of it, there is often a failure of insight; and 
they are found working for issues which they did not anticipate, both in the way of failure 
and in the way of success. In regard to the Divine order embracing the life of all that is, 
has been, shall be, the clearest sighted of mankind see through a glass darkly. 
Constantine was agreed that the triumph of the Christian faith was assured by his 
making it the religion of the State, though John Wesley had afterwards some reason, in 
his time, for thinking perhaps that more harm was done to it by that event than by all the 
Christian persecutions. The Christian world, all but a small part of it, was certain that the 
devil had broken loose in the Reformation in Germany, and few people who heard it did 
not devoutly believe that Luther’s mother was a witch. John Baptist himself is not so 
remarkable for what he knew as for what he did not know of his own life-work and its 
effects. I mean, as regards the eternal order, in which he was no doubt a devout and a 
brave believer. As a forerunner he was nothing of a foreseer. Not only are the greater 
agencies at work in furthering the Divine order least recognised among the mass of men, 
but even among choice spirits devoted to the furthering of that order, misunderstanding 
as to the results of their own activity and the activity of others is more common than 
insight. Thus stands the case as regards one class of agencies at work in furthering the 
Divine order. That which is valued in regard to it is the old ecclesiastical machinery, 
creak and groan and rattle as it may. In the meantime, discredited to some extent by its 
association with enlightenment not always orthodox, the spirit of humanity enters from 

the outside into the religious world, to the creation of new social conditions for whole 
communities. 
(3) What promise there is in this of a better era both for the Church and for the world is 
better seen as yet by the world, perhaps, than by the Church. The importance of the fact 
cannot at any rate be overrated. Nothing is so common in religious circles, among good 
people, as lamentation. The good old times of religion are no more. That is their 
complaint. 
(4) In the meantime, religious people who are so much disposed to complain of the good 
old times passing away are helping to prepare for times infinitely better than the good 
old times, in ways of which they are as far as possible from conceiving. They are 
deepening dissatisfaction with the life, even the religious life of the day, by their 
lamentations. That is one thing—a negative sort of thing. More positive is the effect of 
their keeping in their own view and that of others a certain high ideal of life, though it be 
not the highest of all. (J. Service, D. D.) 
 
 
Christ requires a straight road 
The King’s chariot is coming; you must fill up the ravines and level down the hill,. He will not 
accommodate His chariot to the tortuous lines of your life. If the Lord Jesus Christ is coming 
into your soul, He is not going to follow the crooked ways of your iniquitous conduct. You have 
got to make a straight road for Him. (A. T.Pierson, D. D.) 
 
 
Isaiah 40:4-5 
 
Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made low 
Christianity an essential element in true civilisation 
I. 
THE WORLD IS STILL FULL OF THINGS NEEDING TO BE SET  STRAIGHT. So far as the 
economy of our earth is concerned a period of confusion has immediately preceded the 
establishment of Divine order. Chaos preceded Paradise. Egyptian bondage was the precursor of 
the exodus, which was the beginning of a national life Divinely ruled. Judaism was at its worst 
and Paganism in its most corrupt condition when the voice of the preacher of righteousness was 
heard, preparing the way of the Lord. Isaiah here compares the social and religious condition of 
a people awaiting a revelation of Divine glory to the condition of a country, barren as a desert, 
and impassable by reason of mountains and valleys; and the preparation of a highway amongst 
these physical obstacles represents the exaltation of what is base and the abasement of some 
things that are high in human life before the coming revelation of God. Around us here in 
England, as well as in those foreign countries to which missionary enterprise addresses itself, is 
a wilderness, in which what is good cannot and does not grow. The bodily and moral 
degradation of some of our own people, if it were revealed in all its nakedness, would startle the 
Church from its stately propriety. A “wilderness” is a fit emblem of a large section of our own 
population. Yet in this land we have had the Gospel for centuries. How much more, then, do the 
heathen want and deserve your sympathy! Another phrase in our text, which speaks of “valleys,” 
may remind us further of depths in our social life in which corruption hides. Meanwhile pride 
covers us, as with a garment. We talk of “the progress of the age,” we boast ourselves of our 
achievements and discoveries. There are “mountains” of pride to be brought down, as well as 

valleys of degradation to be exalted. And how many “crooked” things are yet to be made straight! 
What distortions of truth are yet to be found in England, as well as elsewhere! The orderliness of 
Divine progress in the natural world is a truth so contorted that some argue from it that all 
things seen were originally made of things that do appear, and chat there was no Divine Creator 
in whom they found their origin. The mercifulness of God is used as an argument against the 
possibility of punishment for sin. 
II. THE WORLD IS NOT ESSENTIALLY THE BETTER FOR THE HUM AN INVENTIONS OF 
WHICH THE NINETEENTH CENTURY IS SO BOASTFUL. Much o f the misery of modern life 
is due to the fact that moral and religious advance has not kept pace with mechanical advance, 
and our danger is lest developed mechanism should be to our age what a complicated and 
resistless machine would be in the hands of a child who knows not the ends for which it is 
designed. Trains and steamers carry us over land and sea with a swiftness which, to our 
grandfathers, would have seemed incredible. Our daily bread is often the product of labour done 
in the far-off fertile fields of California. There has been a literal fulfilment of these words, which 
speak of conquering mountains and valleys, and overleaping all obstacles, such as Isaiah never 
dreamed of. But the question is fairly asked, Are we the better for all this? Are we wiser, are we 
happier, are we nobler, are we more Christ-like, than our fathers were? We have greater 
appliances than our fathers, but it may be fairly doubted whether we surpass them either in 
capacity or in enjoyment. When you go for a holiday you can rush up the Rhine, through 
Switzerland, and back across France in a fortnight, but probably, in a dozen journeys of that sort 
you see far less than poor Oliver Goldsmith did when, with a fife as his companion, he trudged 
along the highways of Europe. Scientific instruments are marvellous in power and in accuracy, 
but scientific men have not advanced in genius beyond Newton or Herschel. Music is heard on 
every hand; but it is not better than the music of Handel, or of Bach, or of Haydn. In short, we 
have not a higher life because we have higher material appliances, and you and I are not one 
whit the nobler men because we can read all the news of the world in a penny paper, and 
transact our business with the other ends of the earth in a few hours. What do we all gain if, in 
covering our land with factories and steam engines, we are covering it also with want and 
wretchedness? In spite of all scientific discoveries and mechanical appliances, it is evident that 
the world wants something more than these can give. It wants freedom from its sins, and a 
Redeemer who can set it free. It wants love amidst its cruelties, and rest amid its weariness. 
III. THE WORLD REQUIRES MOST OF ALL A REVELATION OF THE  GLORY OF GOD. Many 
say, “Let our trade and our railways and all our conveniences first find entrance to a heathen 
land, and then the people there will be prepared for the Gospel.” A grosser delusion could hardly 
be promulgated. Our own social condition might show its fallacy, and experiment in heathen 
lands has confirmed it. When this so-called “civilisation” has preceded Christianity, idolaters 
have become atheists, and their last state worse than their first. The great object we Christians 
are to keep in view, in all our achievements, is that “the glory of God” may be revealed—not the 
glory of man, nor of a society, nor of a sect, but the glory of God. As a king, a man finds his glory 
in the contentment of his people; as a father, a man finds his glory in the well-being of his 
children; and so the great King and Father of us all finds His “glory” in our contentment and 
well-being. And how can that be brought about? It is by the work and words of those who speak 
“comfortably” to the sinners, who proclaim a reconciled God revealed in Jesus Christ. 
IV. GOD IS LOOKING TO THE CHURCH TO BRING ABOUT THIS CH ANGE. He is addressing 
His people here, and, instead of saying “I will comfort,” He says “Comfort ye.” No angel 
messengers now wing their flight from heaven to announce the glad tidings of great joy. The 
message has been entrusted to us. Let us have patience, though the results of our work at home 
and abroad seem sparse and small. The upraising of valleys and the levelling of mountains is no 
child’s play, even in the physical world, and it is harder still in the spiritual realm. When we 
remember the cost at which some modern discoveries were won, and see the patience and skill 

and risk which accompany the driving of tunnels through mountains, or under the sea, we are 
ashamed of the ease with which Christians give way to disheartenment. In preparing the 
highway here spoken of we must work on the plan the Norwegians adopt for keeping up their 
roads. Each occupier of land, in proportion to his acreage, has his own allotted portion of road to 
maintain, and for that he is responsible. So, in proportion to your capacities and opportunities, 
you have your work to do—in your home, in your class, in your sphere of thought or activity, and 
from that responsibility none can release you. (A. Rowland, B. A.) 
 
 
The prospects of the Church 
I. SOME OF THE MOST FORMIDABLE OBSTRUCTIONS TO THE DIF FUSION AND 
PROGRESS OF TRUE RELIGION AND THE CERTAINTY OF THEIR  REMOVAL. 
1. The defective character of personal religion. There are many features of the Christian 
character scarcely ever brought out to public view; and others whose nature is so 
misapprehended as to lead to a misshapen exhibition of the spirit and precepts of the Gospel 
of Christ. Have you never been pained when at the close of the day you have endeavoured to 
ascertain the character of your thoughts, feelings, and actions? Have you never been 
surprised at the moral personage who has presented himself to your view at such seasons? 
There is much of secularity mingled with the religion that prevails. What has religion done 
for us if it has not so elevated the tone and order of our feelings as to render us indifferent to 
the pleasures of sin? As a natural consequence of this defective piety much is withheld from 
the service of God. There is so much of self mingled[with our religious engagements. The 
purposes of God embrace the agency and co-operation of man. If, then, the piety of the 
Church be defective, if the body that acts for God be enfeebled by disease, or misguided in its 
operations, how fatally must its efficiency be counteracted! But assuredly an end will be put 
to this state of things, for “every valley shall be exalted,” etc. 
2. The division and animosities amongst Christians. A sectarian character has thus been 
given to the Church, a fictitious and morbid zeal has been engendered, and those resources 
which ought to have been expended in the evangelisation of the world have, on many 
occasions, been laid out for party and sinister purposes. 
3. The connection that subsists between religion and State politics. The Christianity that has 
been patronised by the State—that has been adopted as the stepping-stone to emolument 
and power, this has been mistaken for the religion of the Bible. 
II. THE RESULTS WHICH THE PROPHET REPRESENTS AS CONSEQUE NT UPON THE 
REMOVAL OF THESE OBSTRUCTIONS. “The glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh 
shall see it together; for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it.” Nothing can be more inspiring 
than this prospect. If it is gratifying to see the boundaries of science enlarged, or the elements of 
human happiness increased; if the political resurrection of a nation inspires us with joy; if it 
invigorates our hearts to see the spirit of an age awakening from its slumber and preparing itself 
for wise and virtuous action, what should be the emotion of our hearts in contemplating such a 
consummation as is represented in my text? It is not the mere promise of an approaching good 
by which the prophet here seeks to inspire our mind. It contains the elements of all conceivable 
happiness. It will embody and secure to the inhabitants of our world the highest enjoyment of 
which their nature is susceptible. The glory of God has hitherto been but partially unveiled. The 
sun is still behind the cloud, and a shadow is in consequence thrown on our path. But when the 
piety of the Church shall be freed from its present stains, when her divisions are healed, then 
shall she arise and shine, for her light will have come, and the glory of the Lord will be risen 
upon her. But we are informed that” all flesh shall see it “together.” The Evangelist slightly,, 

varies the latter part of the prophecy—“All flesh shall see the salvation of God.” As yet the 
salvation of God is known to but a limited portion of the world. But the salvation of God all are 
yet destined to see. (T. Price.) 
 
 
The levelling force of Christianity 
There are and ever have been in the soul of society opinions, prejudices, feelings, conventional 
notions which, like mountains and valleys, have separated men into classes, and prevented the 
free-flowing interchange of soul. Those mountains rear their frowning heads and throw their 
chilling shadows in every district of society. Those valleys yawn everywhere, and form an 
impassable gulf between the brothers on either side. Christianity has a power to remove those 
mountains, fill up the valleys, etc. How does Christianity do this? In two ways— 
I. BY THE LEVELLING TRUTHS WHICH IT REVEALS. 
1. A common God. 
2. A common nature. 
3. A common obligation. 
4. A common depravity. 
5. A common salvation. 
II. BY THE LEVELLING SPIRIT WHICH IT GENERATES. The spir it which Christianity 
generates in the human soul is such that raises a man above all those prejudices of the heart and 
conventionalities of life that divide men. What is the spirit? It is a spirit that has supreme regard 
to three things— 
1. The spiritual in man. 
2. The right in conduct. 
3. The eternal in destiny. The socially levelling force of Christianity, however, does not 
involve spoliation. (D. Thomas, D. D.) 
 
 
The crooked shall be made straight 
The prophet and the picturesque 
There is much in us which would instinctively resent and repudiate this ideal that he has put 
before us. Take, for instance, that sensitive faculty in our century receiving so peculiar and 
overwhelming a development, the sense of the picturesque. The words of my text break in with a 
very surprising emphasis. This vehemence of the prophet clashes with all the primary instincts 
of this sentiment of ours. Mountains flattened out, valleys filled in, highways levelled from end 
to end, every broken piece of rough ground repaired, every turn and twist in the path 
straightened—what a picture to portray with such rapturous enthusiasm! Could any result be 
more deplorable? It is the very murder of the picturesque! The picturesque asks only that the 
mountains should rise yet higher, be more pathless, more craggy, more perilous; that they 
should be torn by glaciers and scoured by avalanches and wasted by storms and bemoaned by 
winds, and be aghast with lonely desolation—that is what it prefers, that is what excites it,—and 
the valleys shall plunge yet deeper, more gloomy vaults, sunless, with hoarse torrents buried in 
awful black gulfs and roaming along in anger out of sight. There should be no roads if possible; 
at least, never level or straight for two yards together; and there should be cliffs that are 

frowning and overhanging and ruinous and threatening, and high and fierce and solitary rocks. 
Everything should be rough, everything should be crooked, for the sake of the picturesque! 
(Canon H. Scott3Holland, M. A.) 
 
 
Picturesque abuses 
In this contrast between the prophet and the picturesque is there nothing but of a light or 
superficial nature, nothing serious? I doubt it. The prophet’s thunderous intensity brings our 
sentiment to a check just at the point where it is apt to pervert the moral judgment. Where is 
that? At the point where it helps to blind us to the actual life, the actual needs and necessities of 
a living present. The feeling for the picturesque belongs always to those who are outside the 
object of their admiration. They are looking on as unconcerned spectators. That which they 
observe lies wholly outside their own living, personal experience, and that is why it touches 
them and startles them, and pleases because it startles. It is so odd, so unexpected, so dreamy, 
so old. That is the sentiment bred in tourists, in passengers tarrying the day, gazing from 
without at a scene, unaffected by its sorrows, aloof from its inner reality. We like these strange, 
huddled, dirty streets, and these swarming beggars, and these crumbling walls, and these 
crooked alleys, and all the oddities of decay, and all the quaintness of the obsolete. Abuses, so 
long as they do not hurt us, are much more picturesque than their remedies. In this mood what 
serious blunders we have made abroad—offences against our best English self, for the native 
English have a love for liberty, for a free people. How much has our love for the picturesque 
killed our sympathy for freedom in Rome or in Venice, shall we say? This error which we make 
again and again abroad is very apt to repeat itself here at home; for those who have leisure to 
enjoy the picturesque are bound, of course, to have already reached some comfort themselves, 
some security of position. That thatched cottage in the dell, in the hollow of the wood, could 
anything be more engaging? We have sketched it again and again. It is very damp, and those 
colours on it that we like so, the greens and the yellows, reveal the dampness. It is buried under 
the trees, it stands on soppy ground, and there is no drainage; there is a cesspool behind. But 
how raw the new brick four-roomed house would look without an offence in our rustic nook! 
There is a great deal more of this among us comfortable and educated people than we are at all 
aware of. It acts as a dead weight on us, it counteracts the force of our reforming zeal. We should 
never for one moment dream of letting the picturesqueness stand in our way if we had to sink 
into consumption through the damp or die of typhoid in some undrained, old-fashioned street; 
but somehow it puts in its plea with us with far greater power when others are concerned, and 
we are but spectators. It is against all this that the prophet’s zeal thunders. The picturesque may 
rightly widen our sympathies for the past; it may plead for gentle handling of what is so fair in 
the deposits of the past, it may rightly prompt us to do oar very utmost to save what is beautiful 
and natural from cruel, hideous misuse by commercial greed, but there is one supreme law 
which it never must gainsay, the law which is uttered in the cry of the recovered king, Hezekiah, 
when he recovered from his sickness: “Death cannot celebrate Thee. The living shall praise Thee, 
as I do this day.” (Canon H. Scott3Holland, M. A.) 
 
 
Redemptive growth 
Since the cloud and curse of sin, all this growth of ours, which is our life, is remedial, corrective, 
redemptive. It is won through strife over wrong, through struggling out of evil, and always, 
therefore, it must witness to its vitality by straightening the crooked, by making the rough places 
plain. It must always testify to its life. Always it must be bettering bad highways. It must be 
abasing mountains that obstruct and daunt. It must be filling up valleys that cramp and choke 

and darken. That is the necessity, the necessity of clearing the way for free motion towards a 
better day. But, again, even from inside this growing life, even after we have torn ourselves out 
of the ranks of unconcerned spectators and irresponsible tourists, and have thrown ourselves 
with heart and hope into this remedial work, and are keenly striving to bring the crooked 
straight and to loosen the terrible burden of wrong; even then this old perplexity and trouble 
will recur, and recur in a subtler and much deeper form. Perhaps in the very midst of our 
reforming zeal there will suddenly come a thought, a sight crossing our mind of all our hopes 
achieved. The crooked, now so cruelly wrong or disastrously distorted, has at last been made 
perfectly straight. What then? Are we better off? What a poor, stale, stupid place this world will 
have become. All wrongs redressed, all blunders rectified, all inequalities levelled; everybody on 
the same platform, decent, snug, comfortable—a dull, unbroken mass of average respect-
abilities. Comfort for the comfortless—it was for that that we had hungered and toiled. But the 
comfortable! Look at those who have already attained it. Are they so encouraging a prospect? 
What if all were as they? After all, moral character is our sole aim; and will character have lost or 
gained when our efforts have succeeded? Where is character found now? we say. Is it found 
amid the comfortable? Hardly. Is it not always won through suffering, strife, anguish? Those 
rare simplicities of the poor, those generosities, those devotions—are they not worth all the 
smugger virtues? Would they not have vanished in a world where there was nothing crooked, no 
high lights and no dark shadows, no ups and downs? Perhaps we take up some industrial 
Utopia, some book like “Looking Backward,” and as we read we are chilled to the marrow. There 
is a dull recoil. How utterly repugnant; how fiat and stale and unprofitable! All that makes 
humanity dear and pathetic and glorious gone, died out! “No room in such a world,” we say, “for 
high adventures, shining heroisms; no trumpet calls, no splendid risks, no holy indignation, no 
exaltation of sacrifice, no prophetic passion. Democratic equality has levelled all the roads 
straight as dies. They run between their kerbstones. All is smooth, orderly, equitable, and there 
is no material there for art, none for music. Where shall we seek for Schubert’s songs that float 
like dreams? “They were won,” we say, “by his tears.” And where will be our Hamlets and our 
Lears in the romance? How will man ever display his higher capacities except through pain and 
struggle and sorrow? Yet those are the very conditions that we are labouring to deny him. Alas! 
our hearts sink, our imagination protests, our hopes flag, and the glowing passion of the 
prophet, as it catches sight of the very fulfilment of its dream, dies away in the wail of the 
preacher, “Vanity, vanity, even this is vanity.” (Canon H. Scott3Holland, M. A.) 
 
 
No fear of Utopia 
We have invented a terror for ourselves. We need not be the least afraid. These visions of the 
future deceive us by suggesting a finality at which man will have arrived. These Utopias are just 
what will not be true. That is just what we are quite certain will never occur while this present 
age endures. The one thing that we know of the future is that it will not be like that, for we know 
that at each moment of his earthly career, until his Lord Jesus comes again to make earth and 
heaven anew, man will be found warring as a soldier—a pilgrim pressing on towards eternity 
with mountains still towering ahead, dark with unknown destiny, with valleys into which he 
must plunge, and moaning with perils through which he must dare his way; with tough tasks 
still set him to achieve; with nerves, therefore, still strung and prophet voices calling and eyes 
strained forward into the night, and loins girt, and heart on fire, and foes to fight, and deaths to 
die, and victories to win. But you will say, “Is that a very encouraging message? Why waste our 
efforts, then, in struggling to set things right if the crooked will never be straight, if the high road 
will never be levelled? Why grind at smoothing down our present hills if always there will be 
fresh mountains beyond?” Just because man is, in essence, a pilgrim, a soldier, a servant of 
Jesus crucified, and it is his very life to bring this to the front. He discovers himself in and 

through this struggle and pilgrimage, through the strain of the war. That is his mission in which 
he proves his courage and his nerve. Unless he is always correcting evil, unless he is always 
battling down wrongs, he is not himself, and he knows not of what spirit he is made. What the 
particular wrong may be which he is called upon to redress at this moment, or at that, is 
determined for him by the conditions of history, by God Himself, for God is in history-He 
directs, He allots, He distributes the task to man—there is a design clearly disclosed. One by one, 
God brings up to men the difficulties, the obstructions that He would have them encounter. Our 
forefathers had their own fight to fight, and they fought it. They were tested and proved in other 
ways. One fight at a time! They fought for liberty, they fought for free speech; they could not 
attend to underlying poverty. Now their part is played, their mountains are brought low, and 
their crooked things are made straight, and therefore there is time and opportunity for 
something else. There is another task for us, another test applied. We are not to enjoy what our 
fathers put straight without doing our own part to bend the crooked into line, to make rough 
places plain. (Canon H. Scott3Holland, M. A.) 
 
 
The battle for to-day 
Since God is in history, there is continuity in our pilgrimage, and there is purpose. The old wars, 
by healing some wrongs, prepared opportunities for new efforts. There is advance, after all, 
along this- highway, -however much there is still always a rough place just ahead, a cruel corner 
to put straight. We are farther along. There are wrongs righted and thrown behind us, and 
therefore the nearer we draw to the end. Enough for us that we know the spot on the road at 
which we stand, that we know what are the crooked things which it is our own special task to set 
straight. Let us look at them and leave the rest to God. Who can doubt at what spot on the road 
we stand to-day? Those crooked things on which the light of God has been turned in our day-
there they are; we know them and we see them—the commercial pressure that falls on the weak, 
and that breaks and spoils the humanity under it, manhood, womanhood, home, joy; the 
heartless mechanism of an impersonal economic system which crunches the aged, the women, 
the children; the sorrows of those who labour on without any hope of reaching an end of their 
labour; men and women, jaded, bruised, disfigured, always under-fed, invalided by penury, 
unqualified for work, unfit for what they do; men and women tossed to and fro by blind tides of 
fluctuating markets over which they have no control; men and women accumulated in hordes, 
unsheperded and unregarded in squalid tenements, in sordid and mean dishonour, living 
environed by disease, born into a world too masterful for their infirmities, sustained at the edge 
of starvation by a competition that never improves them and yet never eliminates them, drawn 
under by demands which they are helpless to fulfil, bruised and damaged in trying to meet them. 
No one anticipated that our industries would create them or sustain in existence classes of this 
type. They are the signals of some defect in our system, of some perversion, of some disease,, of 
some disaster—that something that meant well enough has gone crooked, that the machinery of 
our civilisation is out of gear. We have got out of the track. That much is plain. Therefore a 
responsibility is laid upon us; a thing has got to be done. (Canon H. Scott3Holland, M. A.) 
 
 
And the rough places plain— 
The rough places made plain 
I. We may take this to be, in outline, THE DESCRIPTION OF GOD’S WORK WITH OUR 
WORLD AND WITH MANKIND, REGARDED AS A PREPARATION FO R THE FUTURE. It is 
the voice of history, of nature, of science, of revelation. The present is a preparation for the 
future, as the past was a preparation for the present, and as the future will be a preparation for a 

still coming and greater future. We know the history of religion; how slow its progress—how for 
centuries it was only successful in casting down obstacles, and preparing the hearts of men for 
the entrance of a faith which was worthy of its Author. It required not the labours of one prophet 
like John only, but the labours of many generations of prophets, to prepare for the advent of 
Jesus Christ. Religion passed through numerous forms before it arrived at that form which 
Christ gave it. And as this was the work of God in the religious thought and life of man, so was it 
the work of God in the world. The kingdom of heaven did not come until the world was in a 
measure ready for it. 
II. So we may say that this is AN INDEX TO THE COURSE OF HIS PROVIDENCE IN EVERY 
AGE AND COUNTRY. This lesson may be learned—that in all cases the spiritual is above the 
material; and that all progress and improvement in the material world are but means to an end, 
and are intended to serve far higher interests. All these benefits of rapid intelligence, of 
conveniences, of comforts, are but the removal of hindrances out of the way of the progress of 
what is spiritual and Divine. If they leave men devoid of better aims—if they leave us selfish, 
earthly, false—they are no blessings after all! If we use the gifts of nature and invention and 
discovery merely to attain our own ends, and if there is no growth of the spirit of truth and 
charity, we have gained nothing: we have merely added to our former powers the power to 
increase our selfishness. But such is not the use for which these new acquisitions are designed. If 
there are more facilities for reaching the human mind by thought and speech or writing, all the 
more carefully ought everyone who has influence over his fellows to see that that influence is 
wholesome, and not hurtful. The material is the servant of the spiritual. What John the Baptist 
was to Christ, such is all the world to the Christ. All nature was a preparation for Him, all 
knowledge, all discovery. The world did not see this at the time; but the fact is true for all that. 
People say that the growth of human wisdom and the increase of human blessings are adverse to 
the Gospel; but on looking back on history we see that all these things were in the hands of God, 
and were all made to prepare the way for the kingdom of God. So it is, and so ought it ever to be. 
III. THE INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY IN MAKING THE PATH TO  GOODNESS EASIER. 
IV. THIS IS OUR WORK AS CHRISTIANS IN THE WORLD AND FOR  THE WORLD. This is 
part of our task for those who are finding the road to goodness and right living hard and rough. 
Each of us has something in his power to prepare the way for the kingdom of God in the lives 
and hearts of others. To many, the difficulties of a right life are very great, and it is no easy task 
for them to carry it out. Everything is against them: training, circumstances, companions, 
habits. From their youngest years they have been familiar with evil. It comes to them naturally 
to deceive, to lie, to do all manner of misdeeds. How can such a youth ever open into a manhood 
of worth or goodness? He must be helped by education, by guidance, by living examples of 
affection and well-doing. Christian society, the Church, must come to his aid. And what is all this 
but doing the work of Christ, the work of prophets and evangelists, the work of the Gospel, 
preparing a highway, helping those who cannot walk, making the rough places plain, making it 
easier for a man to stand in goodness and truth? After all is done, however, both for nations and 
individuals, there will be difficulties to overcome. You can never for yourselves, or for those 
whom you most love, so arrange things that all personal need for care and effort shall cease. 
There will be for every man the cross to carry, and for many men the thorn to trouble them. (A.
Watson, D. D.) 
 
 
Rough places 
I. ROUGH PLACES. 
1. In general human history. 

2. In individual human life. 
II. ROUGH PLACES MADE PLAIN. 
1. The supreme power of Jesus Christ. 
2. The supreme power of Jesus Christ used for the advantage of mankind. 
3. The advantage of mankind identified with the coming kingdom of Jesus Christ. 
III. THE TRANQUIL AND BLESSED FUTURE OF THE WORLD. Chris tianity is good news. 
Inequalities are to be rectified. Relations are to be adjusted. (J. Parker, D. D.) 
 
 
 
 
4 Every valley shall be raised up, 
    every mountain and hill made low; 
the rough ground shall become level, 
    the rugged places a plain. 
 
1.BARNES, “Every valley shall be exalted - That is, every valley, or low piece of ground, 
shall be filled up so as to make a level highway, as was done in order to facilitate the march of 
armies. This verse is evidently designed to explain what is intended in 
Isa_40:3, by preparing 
the way for Yahweh. Applied to the return of the Jews from Babylon, it means simply that the 
impassable valleys were to be filled up so as to make a level road for their journey. If applied to 
the work of John, the forerunner of the Messiah, it means that the nation was to be called on to 
put itself in a state of preparation for his coming, and for the success of his labors among them. 
Vitringa, and others, have endeavored to specify what particular moral qualities in the nation 
are meant by the ‘valley,’ by the ‘mountain and hill,’ and by the ‘crooked’ and ‘rough places.’ But 
the illustrations are such as cannot be demonstrated to be referred to by the prophet. The 
general sense is plain. The language, as we have seen, is taken from the march of a monarch at 
the head of his army. The general idea is, that all obstructions were to be removed, so that the 
march would be without embarrassment. As applicable to the work of John also, the language 
means in general, that whatever there was in the opinions, habits, conduct, in the pride, self-
confidence, and irreligion of the nation that would prevent his cordial reception, was to be 
removed. 

Every mountain and hill - They shall be dug down so as to make the journey easy. All 
obstructions were to be removed. 
And the crooked - The word used here, (בקע  p t"kv) is usually rendered ‘crooked;’ but 
perhaps not by any good authority. The verb בקע  p t" v usually denotes to be behind; to come 
from behind; or, as Gesenius supposes, to be elevated like a mound, arched like a hill or 
tumulus, and is hence applied to the heel from the figure (see Gen_25:26; Hos_12:4). According 
to this, the word would denote properly a hill, mound, or acclivity, which would put back those 
who attempted to ascend. 
Shall be made straight - Margin, ‘A straight place.’ The Hebrew word (רושׁימ  mı;MHxkt_) 
denotes properly “evenness,” a level region, a plain. The hilly places would be reduced to a level. 
And the rough places - Those which are hard, bound up, stony, difficult to pass. Such as 
abounded with rocks and precipices, and which presented obstructions to a journey. Such places 
abounded in the region lying between Palestine and Babylon. 
Plain - Margin, ‘A plain place.’ A smooth, level plain. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
Crooked - The word 
בקע  akob is very generally rendered crooked: but this 
sense of the word seems not to be supported by any good authority. Ludolphus, Comment. ad 
Hist. Aethiop. p. 206, says “that in the Ethiopia language it signifies clivus, locus editus:” and so 
the Syriac Version renders it in this place, אמרע  arama: Hebrew, מרעה  aramah, tumulus, acervus. 
Thus the parallelism would be more perfect:” the hilly country shall be made level, and the 
precipices a smooth plain.” 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill shall be made 
low,.... Which is not to be understood literally, but, as Kimchi says, parabolically and mystically: 
the meaning is, that in consequence of John's ministry, and our Lord's coming, such who were 
depressed and bowed down with the guilt of sin, and were low and humble in their own eyes, 
should be raised up and comforted; and that such who were elated with themselves, and their 
own righteousness, should be humbled; their pride and haughtiness should be brought down, 
and they treated with neglect and contempt, while great notice was taken of lowly minded ones; 
see 
Luk_14:11 and Luk_18:14,  
 
and the crooked shall be straight and the rough places plain; what before was dark and 
intricate in prophecy should now become clear; and such doctrines as were not so well 
understood should now become plain and easy. 
 
4. JAMISON, “
Eastern monarchs send heralds before them in a journey to clear away 
obstacles, make causeways over valleys, and level hills. So John’s duty was to bring back the 
people to obedience to the law and to remove all self-confidence, pride in national privileges, 
hypocrisy, and irreligion, so that they should be ready for His coming (
Mal_4:6; Luk_1:17). 
crooked — declivities. 

 
5. K&D, “
The summons proceeds in a commanding tone. “Let every valley be exalted, and
every mountain and hill made low; and let the rugged be made a plain, and the ledges of rocks
a valley.” 
ה ָי ָהְו, which takes its tone from the two jussive verbs, is also itself equivalent to י ִה ִיו. 
Instead of איֵV (from א ְיַV), the pointing in Zec_14:4, we have here (according to Kimchi) the 
vowel-pointing איֶV; at the same time, the editions of Brescia, Pesaro, Venice 1678, have איֵV (with 
tzere), and this is also the reading of a codex of Luzzatto without Masoretic notes. The 
command, according to its spiritual interpretation, points to the encouragement of those that 
are cast down, the humiliation of the self-righteous and self-secure, the changing of dishonesty 
into simplicity, and of unapproachable haughtiness into submission (for 
p t"kmvx, hilly, rugged, 
(Note: In this ethical sense Essex applied the word to Queen Elizabeth. See Hefele, 
Ximenes, p. 90 (ed. 2).) 
compare 
Jer_17:9 together with Hab_2:4). In general, the meaning is that Israel is to take care, 
that the God who is coming to deliver it shall find it in such an inward and outwards state as 
befits His exaltation and His purpose. 
 
 6. CALVIN, “4.Every valley shall be exalted. He confirms and asserts the preceding statement; for he
shews that no difficulties can prevent the Lord from delivering and restoring his Church whenever he shall
think fit. These words might with propriety be rendered in the imperative mood, “ every valley be
exalted,” (111) so as to be placed in immediate connection with the command which God gives by his
prophets to prepare and level the way for himself; but it makes hardly any difference in the meaning. Let
us be satisfied with understanding the Prophet’ design, “ although many and formidable difficulties are
started to hinder the salvation of the Church, still the hand of God will be victorious and will prevail.”

And every mountain and hill shall be laid low. It ought to be observed that many obstructions always arise
whenever God makes provision for our deliverance, or wishes to aid the afflicted; and although his glory
is more fully displayed by these obstructions, yet we suffer no loss; for we behold more clearly his
wonderful power when no strength, or efforts, or contrivances of men can prevent him from gaining his
object. He conducts his people through “” and steep places in such a manner as if the road were perfectly
level; and by the words mountains and hills, the Prophet undoubtedly intends to denote metaphorically
obstructions of every kind; for Satan attempts in every way to hinder our salvation. When we come,
therefore, to spiritual redemption, these words undoubtedly include both internal and external obstacles,
— lusts and wicked desires, ambition, foolish confidence, and impatience, which retard us wonderfully,
but the Lord will break them all down; for when he stretches out his hand, nothing can restrain or drive
him back.



(111) “ supposes the command at the beginning of the chapter to be still continued, (‘ every valley, etc.,)
and the latest German writers give the same construction of this verse, although they make a new
command begin in the one preceding. The form of the following verb היהו, (vehayah,) though not
incompatible with this explanation, rather favors the strict interpretation of the future, which is, of course,
on general principles to be preferred.” —Alexander.  

 
 
5 And the glory of the Lord will be revealed, 
    and all people will see it together. 
For the mouth of the Lord has spoken.” 
 
1.BARNES, “And the glory of the Lord - The phrase here means evidently the majesty, 
power, or honor of Yahweh. He would display his power, and show himself to be a covenant-
keeping God, by delivering his people from their bondage, and reconducting them to their own 
land. This glory and faithfulness would be shown in his delivering them from their captivity in 
Babylon; and it would be still more illustriously shown in his sending the Messiah to accomplish 
the deliverance of his people in later days. 
And all flesh - All human beings. The word ‘flesh’ is often used to denote human nature, or 
mankind in general 
Gen_6:12; Psa_65:3; Psa_145:21. The idea is, that the deliverance of his 
people would be such a display of the divine interposition, so that all nations would discern the 
evidences of his power and glory. But there is a fullness and a richness in the language which 
allows that it is not to be confined to that event. It is more strikingly applicable to the advent of 
the Messiah - and to the fact that through him the glory of Yahweh would be manifest to all 
nations. Rosenmuller supposes that this should be translated, 
And all flesh shall see together 
That the mouth of Yahweh hath spoken it. 
The Hebrew will bear this construction, but there is no necessity for departing from the 
translation in the common version. The Septuagint adds here the words ‘salvation of God’ so as 
to read it, ‘and all flesh shall see the salvation of God,’ and this reading has been adopted in 
Luk_3:6; or it may be more probable that Luke Luk_3:4-6 has quoted from different parts of 
Isaiah, and that he intended to quote that part, not from the version of the Septuagint, but from 
Isa_52:10. Lowth, on the authority of the Septuagint, proposes to restore these words to the 
Hebrew text. But the authority is insufficient. The Vulgate, the Chaldee, the Syriac, and the 
Hebrew manuscripts concur in the reading of the present Hebrew text, and the authority of the 
Septuagint is altogether insufficient to justify a change. 
For the mouth of the Lord - The strongest possible confirmation that it would be fulfilled 
(see the note at Isa_34:16). The idea is, that God had certainly promised their deliverance from 
bondage; and that his interposition, in a manner which should attract the attention of all 
nations, was certainly purposed by him. Few events have ever more impressively manifested the 
glory of God than the redemption of his people from Babylon; none has occurred, or will ever 
occur, that will more impressively demonstrate his glory, wisdom, and faithfulness, than the 
redemption of the world by the Messiah. 

 
 
2. CLARKE, “
“The salvation of our God” - These words are added here by the 
Septuagint: 
το3σωτηριον3του3Θεου,  תא3תעושי3וניהלא   eth3yesuath3Eloheynu, as it is in the parallel place, 
Isa_52:10. The sentence is abrupt without it, the verb wanting its object; and I think it is 
genuine. Our English translation has supplied the word it, which is equivalent to this addition, 
from the Septuagint. 
This omission in the Hebrew text is ancient, being prior to the Chaldee, Syriac, and Vulgate 
Versions: but the words stand in all the copies of the Septuagint, and they are acknowledged by 
Luke, Luk_3:6. The whole of this verse is wanting in one of my oldest MSS. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed..... Christ himself, who is the 
brightness of his Father's glory, and his own glory, as the glory of the of the only begotten of the 
Father; the glorious perfections of his nature, seen in the miracles wrought, and in the doctrines 
taught by him; the glory of the divine Father, in the face or person of Christ; and the glory of his 
attributes, in the work of salvation by him; all which is most clearly discerned in the glass of the 
Gospel, or in the ministry of the word, by John, Christ himself, and his apostles:  
 
and all flesh shall see it together; not the Jews only, but Gentiles also; not with their bodily 
eyes, but with the eyes of their understanding; even the salvation of the Lord, and his glory, as 
displayed in it, being set forth in the everlasting Gospel to the view of all; see 
Luk_3:7,  
 
for the mouth of the Lord hath spoken it: that his glory should be revealed, and be visible 
to all, and therefore sure and certain; for what he has said he does, and what he has spoken he 
makes good. The Targum is,  
 
"for by the word of the Lord it is so decreed;''  
 
and therefore shall be fulfilled. 
 
4. HENRY, “
When this is done the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, 
Isa_40:5. (1.) When 
the captives are prepared for deliverance Cyrus shall proclaim it, and those shall have the benefit 
of it, and those only, whose hearts the Lord shall stir up with courage and resolution to break 
through the discouragements that lay in their way, and to make nothing of the hills, and valleys, 
and all the rough places. (2.) When John Baptist has for some time preached repentance, 
mortification, and reformation, and so made ready a people prepared for the Lord (Luk_1:17), 
then the Messiah himself shall be revealed in his glory, working miracles, which John did not, 
and by his grace, which is his glory, binding up and healing with consolations those whom John 
had wounded with convictions. And this revelation of divine glory shall be a light to lighten the
Gentiles. All flesh shall see it together, and not the Jews only; they shall see and admire it, see it 
and bid it welcome; as the return out of captivity was taken notice of by the neighbouring 
nations, Psa_126:2. And it shall be the accomplishment of the word of God, not one iota or tittle 
of which shall fall to the ground: The mouth of the Lord has spoken it, and therefore the hand of 
the Lord will effect it. 

By confidence in the word of the Lord, and not in any creature. The mouth of the Lord having
spoken it, the voice has this further to cry (he that has ears to hear let him hear it), The word of
our God shall stand for ever, Isa_40:8. 
1. By this accomplishment of the prophecies and promises of salvation, and the performance 
of them to the utmost in due time, it appears that the word of the Lord is sure and what may be 
safely relied on. Then we are prepared for deliverance when we depend entirely upon the word 
of God, build our hopes on that, with an assurance that it will not make us ashamed: in a 
dependence upon this word we must be brought to own that all flesh is grass, withering and 
fading. (1.) The power of man, when it does appear against the deliverance, is not to be feared; 
for it shall be as grass before the word of the Lord: it shall wither and be trodden down. The 
insulting Babylonians, who promise themselves that the desolations of Jerusalem shall be 
perpetual, are but as grass which the spirit of the Lord blows upon, makes nothing of, but blasts 
all its glory; for the word of the Lord, which promises their deliverance, shall stand for ever, and 
it is not in the power of their enemies to hinder the execution of it. (2.) The power of man, when 
it would appear for the deliverance, is not to be trusted to; for it is but as grass in comparison 
with the word of the Lord, which is the only firm foundation for us to build our hope upon. 
When God is about to work salvation for his people he will take them off from depending upon 
creatures, and looking for it from hills and mountains. They shall fail them, and their 
expectations from them shall be frustrated: The Spirit of the Lord shall blow upon them; for 
God will have no creature to be a rival with him for the hope and confidence of his people; and, 
as it is his word only that shall stand for ever, so in that word only our faith must stand. When 
we are brought to this, then, and not till then, we are fit for mercy. 
2. The word of our God, that glory of the Lord which is now to be revealed, the gospel, and 
that grace which is brought with it to us and wrought by it in us, shall stand for ever; and this is 
the satisfaction of all believers, when they find all their creature-comforts withering and fading 
like grass. Thus the apostle applies it to the word which by the gospel is preached unto us, and
which lives and abides for ever as the incorruptible seed by which we are born again, 
1Pe_1:23-25. To prepare the way of the Lord we must be convinced, (1.) Of the vanity of the 
creature, that all flesh is grass, weak and withering. We ourselves are so, and therefore cannot 
save ourselves; all our friends are so, and therefore are unable to save us. All the beauty of the 
creature, which might render it amiable, is but as the flower of grass, soon blasted, and therefore 
cannot recommend us to God and to his acceptance. We are dying creatures; all our comforts in 
this word are dying comforts, and therefore cannot be the felicity of our immortal souls. We 
must look further for a salvation, look further for a portion. (2.) Of the validity of the promise of 
God. We must be convinced that the word of the Lord can do that for us which all flesh cannot - 
that, forasmuch as it stands for ever, it will furnish us with a happiness that will run parallel 
with the duration of our souls, which must live for ever; for the things that are not seen, but 
must be believed, are eternal. 
 
 
5. JAMISON, “
see it — The Septuagint for “it,” has “the salvation of God.” So 
Luk_3:6 
(compare Luk_2:30, that is, Messiah); but the Evangelist probably took these words from 
Isa_52:10. 
for — rather, “All flesh shall see that the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken it” [Bengel]. 
 
6. K&D, “
The cry of the crier proceeds thus in 
Isa_40:5 : “And the glory of Jehovah will be
revealed, and all flesh seeth together: for the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken it.” The pret. cons. 

ה ָל ְגִנ ְק is here apodosis imper. When the way is prepared for Jehovah the Coming One, the glory 
of the God of salvation will unveil itself (on the name Jehovah, which is applied to God, the 
absolute I, as living and revealing Himself in history, more especially in the history of salvation). 
His parousia is the revelation of His glory (1Pe_4:13). This revelation is made for the good of 
Israel, but not secretly or exclusively; for all the human race, called here designedly “all flesh” 
(
kol v tH t_), will come to see it (compare 
Luk_3:6, “the salvation of God”). Man, because he is 
flesh, cannot see God without dying (Exo_33:20); but the future will fill up this gulf of 
separation. The object to the verb “see” is not what follows, as Rosenmüller supposes, viz., “that 
the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken,” for the word of promise which is here fulfilled is not one 
addressed to all flesh; nor does it mean, “see that Jehovah hath spoken with His own mouth,” 
i.e., after having become man, as Stier maintains, for the verb required in this case would be 
ר ֵE ַד ְמ, not ר ֵE ִG. The clause, “for the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken it,” is rather Isaiah's usual 
confirmation of the foregoing prophecy. Here the crier uses it to establish the certainty of what 
he foretells, provided that Israel will do what he summons it to perform. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “5.And the glory of Jehovah shall be revealed. He means that this work of redemption will
be splendid, so that the Lord will shew that he is the Author of it, and will illustriously display his majesty
and power. This, indeed, is very openly manifested in all places and in all events, but he promises that he
will do this especially in protecting and delivering his Church, and not without good reason; for the
deliverance of the Church, from its commencement down to the coming of Christ, might be called a
renewal of the world. (112) And because the power of God, which he had formerly been accustomed to
display, was almost extinguished, so that scarcely the slightest traces were discernible, as it is said in the
Psalm, “ do not see our signs,” (Psa_74:9;) this was a very seasonable warning, that a new and striking
demonstration is promised, by which they may perceive that God has in his power various methods of
giving relief, even when he conceals them for a time.

And all flesh shall see. He now heightens the miracle by an additional circumstance, that it will be known
not only in Judea, but in foreign and distant countries; for by these words “ flesh shall see,” he means that
there will be no nations that do not see clearly that the return of the people is a heavenly work, and that
God did not speak in vain by the Prophet. Thus he censures the unbelief of men, who never rely on the
promises of God, and who treat as fables whatever is said by the prophets, till by beholding the actual
fact they are constrained to yield.

That the mouth of Jehovah hath spoken. Here we are taught what is the true method of correcting our
unbelief; that is, to be employed in meditating on the promises of God, and to have our faith strengthened
by all the proofs of them which he exhibits. Thus it is proper to join doctrine with experience; for since the
sight of God’ works would produce little impression on us, he first enlightens us by the torch of his word,
and next seals the truth of it by the actual accomplishment.



(112) “Un renonvellement incroyable, ou seconde creation du monde.” “ incredible renewal or second
creation of the world.” 
 

 
6 A voice says, “Cry out.” 
    And I said, “What shall I cry?” 
“All people are like grass, 
    and all their faithfulness is like the flowers of the 
field. 
 
1.BARNES, “The voice said - Or rather ‘a voice.’ Isaiah represents himself here again as 
hearing a voice. The word ‘the’ introduced in our translation, mars the sense, inasmuch as it 
leads to the supposition that it was the voice of the same person or crier referred to in 
Isa_40:3. 
But it is different. That was the voice of a crier or herald, proclaiming that a way was to be open 
in the desert. This is introduced for a different purpose. It is to proclaim distinctly that while 
everything else was fading and transitory, the promise of God was firm and secure. Isaiah 
therefore, represents himself as hearing a voice requiring the prophets (so the Chaldee) to make 
a proclamation. An inquiry was at once made, What should be the nature of the proclamation? 
The answer was, that all flesh was grass, etc. He had Isa_40:3-5 introduced a herald announcing 
that the way was to be prepared for their return. He now introduces another voice with a distinct 
message to the people, that God was faithful, and that his promises would not fail. A voice, a 
command is heard, requiring those whose duty it was, to make proclamation. The voice of God; 
the Spirit speaking to the prophets, commanded them to cry. 
And he said - Lowth and Noyes read this, ‘And I said.’ The Septuagint and the Vulgate read 
it also in this manner, in the first person. Two manuscripts examined by Kennicott also read it in 
the first person. Houbigant, Hensler, and Doderlin adopt this reading. But the authority is not 
sufficient to justify a change in the Hebrew text. The Syriac and Chaldee read it as it is in the 
present Hebrew text, in the third person. The sense is, that the person, or prophet to whom the 
command came to make proclamation, made answer, ‘What shall be the nature of my 
proclamation?’ It is equivalent to saying, ‘It was answered;’ or if Isaiah is the person to whom 
the voice is represented as coming, it means that he answered; and is, therefore, equivalent to 
the reading in the Septuagint and Vulgate, and adopted by Lowth. This is the probable 
supposition, that Isaiah represents himself as hearing the voice, and as expressing a willingness 
to make proclamation, but as waiting to know what he was to proclaim. 
All flesh - This is the answer; or this is what he was to proclaim. The general design or scope 
of the answer was, that he was to proclaim that the promise of Yahweh was secure and firm 
Isa_40:8, and that therefore God would certainly come to deliver them. To make this more 
impressive by way of contrast, he states that all people are weak and feeble like the grass that is 
soon withered. The expression does not refer particularly to the Jews in Babylon, or to any 
single nation or class of people, but to all people, in all places, and at all times. All princes, 
nobles, and monarchs; all armies and magistrates are like grass, and will soon pass away. On the 

one hand, they would be unable to accomplish what was needful to be done in the deliverance of 
the people; and on the other, their oppressors had no power to continue their bondage, since 
they were like grass, and must soon pass away. But Yahweh was ever-enduring, and was able to 
fulfill all his purposes. 
Is grass - It is as feeble, weak, and as easily consumed as the grass of the field. A similar 
sentiment is found in Psa_103:15-16 : 
As for man, his days are as grass; 
As a flower of the field so he flourisheth; 
For the wind passeth over it, and it is gone, 
And the place thereof shall know it no more. 
See also Jam_1:10-11. The passage in Isaiah is evidently quoted by Peter, 1Pe_1:24-25 : ‘All 
flesh is as grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth, and the 
flower thereof falleth away: but the word of the Lord endureth forever; and this is the word 
which by the gospel is preached unto you’ - a passage which proves that Isaiah had reference to 
the times of the Messiah in the place before us. 
And all the goodliness thereof - The word rendered ‘goodliness’ (דסח  chesed) denotes 
properly, kindness, love, goodwill, mercy, favor. Here it is evidently used in the sense of 
elegance, comeliness, beauty. The Septuagint renders it: δόξα  doxa, and so does Peter 1Pe_1:24. 
Applied to grass, or to herbs, it denotes the flower, the beauty, the comeliness. Applied to man, it 
means that which makes him comely and vigorous - health, energy, beauty, talent, wisdom. His 
vigor is soon gone; his beauty fades; his wisdom ceases; and he falls, like the flower, to the dust. 
The idea is, that the plans of man must be temporary; that all that appears great in him must be 
like the flower of the field; but that Yahweh endures, and his plans reach from age to age, and 
will certainly be accomplished. This important truth was to be proclaimed, that the people might 
be induced not to trust in man, but put their confidence in the arm of God. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
The voice saint Cry “A voice saith Proclaim” - To understand rightly 
this passage is a matter of importance; for it seems designed to give us the true key to the 
remaining part of Isaiah’s prophecies, the general subject of which is the restoration of the 
people and Church of God. The prophet opens the subject with great clearness and elegance: he 
declares at once God’s command to his messengers, (his prophets, as the Chaldee rightly 
explains it), to comfort his people in captivity, to impart to them the joyful tidings, that their 
punishment has now satisfied the Divine justice, and the time of reconciliation and favor is at 
hand. He then introduces a harbinger giving orders to prepare the way for God, leading his 
people from Babylon, as he did formerly from Egypt, through the wilderness, to remove all 
obstacles, and to clear the way for their passage. 
Thus far nothing more appears to be intended than a return from the Babylonish captivity; 
but the next words seem to intimate something much greater: -  
“And the glory of Jehovah shall be revealed; 
And all flesh shall see together the salvation of our God.” 
He then introduces a voice commanding him to make a solemn proclamation. And what is the 
import of it? that the people - the flesh, is of a vain temporary nature; that all its glory fadeth, 
and is soon gone; but that the word of God endureth for ever. What is this, but a plain 
opposition of the flesh to the spirit; of the carnal Israel to the spiritual; of the temporary Mosaic 

economy to the eternal Christian dispensation? You may be ready to conclude, (the prophet may 
be disposed to say), by this introduction to my discourse, that my commission is only to comfort 
you with a promise of the restoration of your religion and polity, of Jerusalem, of the temple, 
and its services and worship in all its ancient splendor. These are earthly, temporary, shadowy, 
fading things, which shall soon pass away, and be destroyed for ever; these are not worthy to 
engage your attention in comparison of the greater blessings, the spiritual redemption, the 
eternal inheritance, covered under the veil of the former, which I have it in charge to unfold unto 
you. The law has only a shadow of good things; the substance is the Gospel. I promise you a 
restoration of the former, which, however, is only for a time, and shall be done away, according 
to God’s original appointment: but under that image I give you a view of the latter, which shall 
never be done away, but shall endure for ever. This I take to be agreeable to St. Peter’s 
interpretation of this passage of the prophet, quoted by him, 1Pe_1:24, 1Pe_1:25 : “All flesh is as 
grass, and all the glory of man as the flower of grass. The grass withereth and the flower thereof 
falleth away; but the word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the 
Gospel is preached unto you.” This is the same word of the Lord of which Isaiah speaks, which 
hath now been preached unto you by the Gospel. The law and the Gospel are frequently opposed 
to one another by St. Paul, under the images of flesh and spirit: “Having begun in the spirit, are 
ye now made perfect by the flesh?” Gal_3:3. - L. 
All the Godliness thereof - ”All its glory” - For ודסח  chasdo read ודח  chadu; the 
Septuagint and Vulgate, and 1Pe_1:24. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
The voice said, cry,.... Not the same voice as in 
Isa_40:3, nor the voice of an angel, 
as Aben Ezra; but a voice from the Lord, as Jarchi; the voice of prophecy, says Kimchi; it is the 
Lord's voice to the prophet, or rather to any and every Gospel minister, giving them an order to 
prophesy and preach, without which they cannot preach regularly and lawfully; it is the same as, 
"go, teach all nations", &c. preach the Gospel to every creature, &c. Mat_28:19,  
 
and he said, what shall I cry? publish, proclaim, or preach? for a minister of the Gospel is to 
preach not out of his own heart, or of his own head, or what is of his own devising and framing, 
but what is agreeable to the mind of Christ, as revealed in his word; he is to speak according to 
the oracles of God, the proportion and analogy of faith; he is to inquire there, and of Christ, what 
he shall say. The Targum is,  
 
"the voice of him that saith, prophesy; and he answered and said, what shall I prophesy?''  
 
The reply is,  
 
all flesh is grass; declare the frailty and mortality of men; which some think is mentioned, to 
increase the wonder of Christ's incarnation, after prophesied of, as the forerunner of it is before; 
that Christ should condescend to take upon him such frail mortal flesh; that he should become 
flesh, and be manifested in it: or rather this is to be said, to put men in mind and to prepare 
them to think of another world, and how they shall appear before the judgment seat; seeing, if 
they have not a better righteousness than their own, and except they are born again, they shall 
neither see nor enter into the kingdom of heaven; which is one of the first things to be published 
in the Gospel ministry; as also how weak, impotent, and insufficient, men are, to that which is 
good, which may be meant by this phrase; being as weak as a spire of grass, not able to do any 
good actions, much less to fulfil the law, or to regenerate themselves, renew their hearts, or 
cleanse their natures: and this must be said, to abate the pride of men; to show the necessity of 

divine power in regeneration; to instruct men to seek for the grace of God, as to convert them, so 
to help and assist them in all they do; and to direct them to ascribe all they have, and are, to the 
grace of God; to this purpose the Apostle Peter quotes this passage, 1Pe_1:23. It may be applied 
to the ordinances of the legal dispensation, and all the privileges of it, which are said to be 
carnal; and trusting in them was trusting in the flesh, Phi_3:4, Heb_9:10, these were weak and 
insufficient to justify, sanctify, and save, and were not to continue:  
 
and all the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field; all the goodliness and glory 
of man; all that is excellent and valuable in him, or belonging to him, Or that is thought to be so, 
his riches, honours, strength, beauty, wisdom, and knowledge; yea, all his seeming holiness and 
righteousness; which are all fading and perishing, like a gay flower, which appears lovely for a 
while, and on a sudden falls off, or is cropped, or trampled upon; to which a flower of the field is 
more liable than that of the garden. This may be applied to the splendour of the legal 
dispensation, which is done away by a more excellent glory taking place, 2Co_3:10. 
 
4. CHARLES SIMEON, “ 6-8, “
THE IMMUTABILITY OF THE GOSPEL
Isa_40:6?8. The voice said, Cry. And he said, What shall I cry? All flesh is grass, and all the goodliness 
thereof is as the flower of the field: the grass withereth, the flower fadeth: because the Spirit of the Lord 
bloweth upon it; surely the people is grass. The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our 
God shall stand for ever. 
 
GOD doeth according to his own will in the armies of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth.
When his time was come for the deliverance of Israel out of Egypt, in vain did Pharaoh labour to retain
them. Thus the prophet was inspired to declare the redemption of the Jews from Babylon, and the still
greater redemption of the world from sin and Satan, in despite of all endeavours which might be used to
thwart the divine purpose. This seems to be the immediate scope of the words before us. But they may
also be taken as a general declaration respecting the instability of every thing human, and the 
immutability of God’s word. 
 
I. The instability of every thing human—

The comparison of man to grass is very frequent in the Scriptures; and it affords a just description of,

1. Our temporal comforts—

[The grass in the early spring adorns and beautifies the face of nature; but, when parched by a burning
sun or an eastern blast, it soon withers and decays: in the same manner the beauty and strength of youth
are soon turned to weakness and deformity: the affluence and honour of the rich are quickly changed to
degradation and want: and all our goodly fabrics of case and happiness are soon demolished. St. James
illustrates this truth by the very comparison in the text [Note: Jam_1:9?11.]: and as Job experienced it in
the days of old, so in every age may numerous instances be found of such vicissitudes.]

2. Our spiritual comforts—

[God is pleased to give rich consolation to his people: and, while they enjoy it, their faces are made, as it
were, to shine, as the face of Moses did, when he descended from the holy mount. But these comforts
are often of short continuance. When Peter thought of building tabernacles to protract his happiness, a

cloud immediately overshadowed him, and he was called down to renew his conflicts with the world
[Note: Mar_9:5; Mar_9:7; Mar_9:14.]. When David fancied his mountain so strong that he should never be
moved, God hid his face from him and he was troubled [Note: Psa_30:7.]. Thus it is also with all the
people of God; whose manifold changes in this respect may well be compared with the diversified scenes
of nature under the influence of kindly showers, or malignant winds [Note: Psa_102:2?4.].]

3. Our very life itself—

[In the midst of health we promise ourselves years to come: but, when God withdraws our breath, we
instantly return to our native dust. Some look more gay and possess more “goodliness” than others; but
they are only as the “flower of the field,” which cannot survive the grass, and not unfrequently falls before
it. In this view the inspired writers describe our state [Note: Job_14:1?2. Psa_90:3?6. Psa_103:15?16.];
and both observation and experience attest the truth of their representations: we must all confess, in the
language of the text, “Surely, the people is grass.”]

But while every thing human is thus frail and transient, we have a firm foundation whereon to stand,
namely,

II. The immutability of God’s blessed word—

The “word of God” here spoken of, may be understood as relating to Christ, who is often called by this
name, and whose immutability is mentioned by the Psalmist in this very view [Note: Psa_102:11?
12; Psa_102:26?27.]. But St. Peter informs us that the prophet spake of the Gospel?salvation
[Note: 1Pe_1:24?25.]. Now

This “word” contains the most important and comfortable truths—

[There is no want, which it is not able to supply, no disorder, for which it does not prescribe a remedy. It
proclaims health to the sick, sight to the blind, liberty to the captives, and life to the dead. So extensive
are its invitations and promises, that there is not a human being excluded from its provisions, nor is there
any limit to the blessings which it will impart. It assures us, that sins of a crimson die may become white
as snow; that the most heavy?laden soul may obtain rest; and that none, who come to Jesus, shall on any
account be cast out [Note: Isa_1:18. Mat_11:28. Joh_6:37.].]

Nor is it a small excellence in these truths, that they are as immutable as God himself—

[How vain were the attempts of men and devils to stop the progress of the Gospel, and to make void the
declarations of God respecting it! Equally vain shall be every endeavour to invalidate the promises which
he has made to the believing penitent. Has he said, that “all manner of sin shall be forgiven; that he will
cleanse us from all our filthiness and from all our idols; and that, where he has begun the good work, he
will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ?” We may rest assured that he will fulfil his word: for “he is not
a man, that he should lie, or a son of man that he should repent.” But it may be said, “Though God
changeth not, yet we change, and therefore may forfeit our interest in the promises.” True; if God should
leave us, we not only may, but most undoubtedly shall, both fall and perish. But God has said, I will never
leave thee nor forsake thee; so that we may adopt the confident declaration of St. Paul, “I know in whom I
have believed, that he is able to keep that which I have committed to him.” We must be strong in faith,
giving glory to God. Then, though difficulties may arise, and appear for a while wholly insurmountable,
they shall surely be overcome; “Every valley shall be exalted, and every mountain and hill be made low,
and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough places plain; and we shall see the salvation of

God.”]

We may learn from hence,

1. The folly of seeking our rest in earthly things—

[The injunction given to the prophet to “cry,” and to proclaim aloud that “all flesh is grass,” and the 
frequent repetition of this comparison, are strong intimations of the extreme vanity of every thing here
below. And who amongst us has not found that the enjoyments he fondly anticipated, have either eluded
his grasp, or deceived his expectation? Whatever then be our comforts in life, let us not set our hearts
upon them, but “so use the world as not abusing it, knowing that the fashion thereof passeth away.”]

2. The wisdom of embracing the Gospel?salvation—

[They who trust in the word of God are sure of never being disappointed. However high their expectations
are raised, they shall never be ashamed. The stronger their faith, the more abiding will be their comfort.
Besides, their enjoyments, instead of cloying, will become more and more delightful; and, instead of
bringing with them many inseparable ills, will produce nothing but good to their souls. But that which most
of all must endear the Gospel to them is, that their happiness will then be consummated, when they,
whose comforts were of an earthly nature, will want even a drop of water to cool their tongue. Let the
word of God then be precious to our souls. Let Christ, as revealed in it, be the object of our faith, and
hope, and love. Let us embrace the promises, assured that they shall all be fulfilled; and let us tremble at
the threatening, knowing that they shall all be executed. Thus shall we be proof against the temptations of
the world, and shall possess an eternity of glory, when the lovers of this present world will lie down in
everlasting burnings.]

 
5. JAMISON, “
The voice — the same divine herald as in 
Isa_40:3. 
he — one of those ministers or prophets (see on Isa_40:1) whose duty it was, by direction of 
“the voice,” to “comfort the Lord’s afflicted people with the promises of brighter days.” 
All flesh is grass — The connection is, “All human things, however goodly, are transitory: 
God’s promises alone steadfast” (Isa_40:8, Isa_40:15, Isa_40:17, Isa_40:23, Isa_40:24); this 
contrast was already suggested in Isa_40:5, “All flesh ... the mouth of the Lord.” 1Pe_1:24, 
1Pe_1:25 applies this passage distinctly to the gospel word of Messiah (compare Joh_12:24; 
Jam_1:10). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
The prophet now hears a second voice, and then a third, entering into conversation 
with it. “Hark, one speaking, Cry! And he answers, What shall I cry? All flesh is grass, and all
its beauty as the flower of the field. Grass is withered, flower faded: for the breath of Jehovah
has blown upon it. Surely grass is the people; grass withereth, flower fadeth: yet the word of
our God will stand for ever.” A second voice celebrates the divine word of promise in the face of 
the approaching fulfilment, and appoints a preacher of its eternal duration. The verb is not 
ר ַמּאָו 
(et dixi, lxx, Vulg.), but ר ַמcְו; so that the person asking the question is not the prophet himself, 
but an ideal person, whom he has before him in visionary objectiveness. The appointed theme of 

his proclamation is the perishable nature of all flesh (Isa_40:5 πdσα3σάρξ, here πdσα363σάρξ), 
and, on the other hand, the imperishable nature of the word of God. Men living in the flesh are 
universally impotent, perishing, limited; God, on the contrary (Isa_31:3), is the omnipotent, 
eternal, all-determining; and like Himself, so is His word, which, regarded as the vehicle and 
utterance of His willing and thinking, is not something separate from Himself, and therefore is 
the same as He. 
Chasdo is the charm or gracefulness of the outward appearance (lxx; 
1Pe_1:24, δ
όξα: see Schott on the passage, Jam_1:11, ε4πρέπεια). The comparison instituted with grass and 
flower recals Isa_37:27 and Job_8:12, and still more Psa_90:5-6, and Job_14:2. Isa_40:7 
describes what happens to the grass and flower. The preterites, like the Greek aoristus
gnomicus (cf., Isa_26:10), express a fact of experience sustained by innumerable examples: 
exaruit gramen, emarcuit flos; 
(Note: ל ֵבָנ has munach here and in Isa_40:8 attached to the penultimate in all correct texts 
(hence milel, on account of the monosyllable which follows), and  mehteg on the tzere to 
sustain the lengthening.) 
consequently the י ִI which follows is not hypothetical (granting that), but explanatory of the 
reason, viz., “because 
ruach3Jehovah hath blown upon it,” i.e., the “breath” of God the Creator, 
which pervades the creation, generating life, sustaining life, and destroying life, and whose most 
characteristic elementary manifestation is the wind. Every breath of wind is a drawing of the 
breath of the whole life of nature, the active indwelling principle of whose existence is the 
ruach 
of God. A fresh v. ought to commence now with 
ן ֵכc. The clause ם ָע ָה רִיצ ָח ן ֵכc is genuine, and 
thoroughly in Isaiah's style, notwithstanding the lxx, which Gesenius and Hitzig follow. ןכע is not 
equivalent to a comparative ן ֵכ (Ewald, §105, a), but is assuring, as in Isa_45:15; Isa_49:4; 
Isa_53:4; and x tp to (the people) refers to men generally, as in Isa_42:5. The order of thought is 
in the form of a triolet. The explanation of the striking simile commences with  ) tKxIms (surely); 
and then in the repetition of the words, “grass withereth, flower fadeth,” the men are intended, 
resemble the grass and the flower. Surely grass is the human race; such grass withereth and such 
flower fadeth, but the word of our God (Jehovah, the God of His people and of sacred history) 
M t
qum
 l
e
pkm. to, i.e., it rises up without withering or fading, and endures for ever, fulfilling and 
verifying itself through all times. This general truth refers, in the preset instance, to the word of 
promise uttered by the voice in the desert. If the word of God generally has an eternal duration, 
more especially is this the case with the word of the parousia of God the Redeemer, the word in 
which all the words of God are yea and amen. The imperishable nature of this word, however, 
has for its dark foil the perishable nature of all flesh, and all the beauty thereof. The oppressors 
of Israel are mortal, and their chesed with which they impose and bribe is perishable; but the 
word of God, with which Israel can console itself, preserves the fields, and ensures it a glorious 
end to its history. Thus the seal, which the first crier set upon the promise of Jehovah's speedy 
coming, is inviolable; and the comfort which the prophets of God are to bring to His people, who 
have now been suffering so long, is infallibly sure. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “6.The voice said, Cry. He now describes a different “” from that of which he formerly
spoke; for hitherto he had spoken about the “” of the prophets, but now he means the “” of God himself

commanding the prophets to cry. Although the voice of the prophets is also the voice of God, whose
instruments they are, (for they do not speak of themselves,) (2Pe_1:20,) yet this distinction is necessary,
that we may know when the Lord commands, and when the prophets and ministers execute his
commandments. There is also a beautiful comparison between the two “” that we may receive with as
much reverence what the prophets utter as if God himself thundered from heaven; for they speak only by
his mouth, and repeat as ambassadors what he has commissioned them to declare. Besides, this preface
gives notice that the Prophet is about to speak of something highly important; for, although he
everywhere testifies that he faithfully delivers from hand to hand what he has received from God, yet, in
order to obtain closer attention, he states that the voice of God has expressly enjoined the mode of
speaking which he shall employ. Such is also the import of the word Cry, as if he had said that he must
proclaim this commandment in a clear and loud voice, that it may make the deeper impression.

And I said, What shall I cry? The addition of this question has great weight; for the Prophet means that he
does not break forth at random, and boast of what he appeared to have heard in a confused manner; but
that he received clear and undoubted instruction, after having waited for it with composure. Besides, from
the fact itself we may learn that there is nothing here that is superfluous, because two chief points of
heavenly doctrine were to be briefly handled; that, although man is smoke and vanity, and all his
excellence is deceitful and fading, yet believers have the best reason for glorying, because they seek
salvation not from themselves; and that, although they are strangers on the earth, (Heb_11:13,) yet they
possess heavenly happiness, because God unites himself to them by his word; for by renouncing
ourselves we are led to desire the grace of God. The Prophet knew, indeed, what he ought to say; but by
this question he intended to make a stronger impression on their minds, in order to shew that he and all
the other servants of God are constrained by necessity to utter this sentiment, and that they cannot begin
to teach in any other manner, though they should put a hundred questions and inquiries; as indeed they
will gain nothing by choosing to adopt any other method.

As to the word Cry, I have no objection to view it as denoting both boldness and clearness; because
prophets ought not to mutter in an obscure manner, but to pronounce their message with a distinct voice,
and to utter boldly and with open mouth whatever they have been commanded to declare. Let every one,
therefore, who is called to this office constantly remember and believe, that he ought to meet difficulties of
every sort with unshaken boldness, such as was always manifested both by prophets and by apostles.

“ to me,” says Paul, “ I do not preach the gospel; for necessity is laid on me.” 
 
(1Co_9:16.)

All flesh is grass. First, it ought to be observed, that he does not speak merely of the frailty of human life,
but extends the discourse farther, so as to reduce to nothing all the excellence which men think that they
possess. David indeed compares this life to grass, (Psa_103:15,) because it is fading and transitory; but
the context shews that the Prophet does not speak only of the outward man, but includes the gifts of the
mind, of which men are exceedingly proud, such as prudence, courage, acuteness, judgment, skill in the
transactions of business, in which they think that they excel other animals; and this is more fully
expressed by that which immediately follows —

All the grace of it. Some translate ודסח (chasdo) “ glory;” others, “ kindness;” but I have preferred the word
“” by which I mean everything that procures honor and esteem to men. Yet a passive signification may
also be admitted; as if the Prophet had said, that all that is excellent and worthy of applause among men
is the absolute kindness of God. Thus David calls God “ God of his kindness,” (Psa_59:10,) because he
acknowledges him to be the author of all blessings, and ascribes it to his grace that he has obtained them

so largely and abundantly. It is indeed certain that דסח (chesed) here denotes all that is naturally most
highly valued among men, and that the Prophet condemns it for vanity, because there is an implied
contrast between the ordinary nature of mankind and the grace of regeneration.

Some commentators refer this to the Assyrians, as if the Prophet, by extenuating their power and wealth,
and industry and exertions, or rather by treating these as they had no existence, freed the minds of the
Jews from terror. They bring out the meaning in this manner, “ you are terrified at the strength of men,
remember that they are flesh, which quickly gives way through its own weakness. But their error is soon
afterwards refuted by the context, in which the Prophet expressly applies it to the Jews themselves. We
ought carefully to observe that man, with his faculties, on account of which he is accustomed to value
himself so highly, is wholly compared to a flower. All men are fully convinced of the frailty of human life,
and on this subject heathen writers have argued at great length; but it is far more difficult to root out the
confidence which men entertain through a false opinion of their wisdom; for, if they imagine that they have
either knowledge or industry beyond others, they think that they have a right to glory in them. But he
shews that in man there is nothing so excellent as not to fade quickly and perish.

As the flower of the field. The Prophet seems, as if in mockery, to add a sort of correction; for a flower is
something more than grass. It is, therefore, an acknowledgment, that, although men have some shining
qualities, like flowers in the fields, yet the beauty and lustre quickly vanish and pass away, so that it is
useless for them to flatter or applaud themselves on account of this idle and deceitful splendor.  
 
8. BI 6-8, “
The earthly transitory: the heavenly enduring 
When we make a judgment of the objects of sense and of faith, “the things that are seen” claim 
the preference over “the things that are not seen.” The appearance which the world presents is 
seducing, that which religion exhibits is forbidding. The appearances are deceitful, and the 
judgment we form of them false. 
I. THE VANITY OF THE THINGS OF THIS LIFE. Empty as is every thing in the world, and 
limited in its duration, it is one of the truths the most common and the least received. 
1. The voice of reason teaches men that they have only a little while to live. If they will but 
reflect upon their constitution, they cannot but discover, both within and without, 
innumerable principles of their speedy dissolution. 
2. This the Scripture teaches without ceasing: adapting its lessons to the importance of the 
awakening truth, no strong expressions are overlooked, no striking images escape the sacred 
writers. 
3. Besides, our own experience proclaims to us the fact by the most indubitable proofs. 
II. THE SOUNDNESS OF A CHRISTIAN’S HOPE IN FUTURITY. The  future is as enlivening to 
the Christian as the past is humiliating to the man. Death, properly speaking, is only the lot of 
the wicked. The Christian, in the estimation of the Gospel, never dies; he falls asleep, he “rests 
from his labours.” (P. Huet.) 
 
 
The fading and the abiding 
I. “ALL FLESH IS GRASS.” The prophet describes man by this name of “flesh,” as that which 
strikingly sets forth his general state and ordinary habits. What is man? Is not the care of the 

flesh his grand concern?—the pampering the body, the gratifying its senses, or fulfilling the lusts 
thereof? Here and there, indeed, we meet with one who has broken its trammels;, whose soul, 
rising up on the wings of faith and love, seeks for happiness in God; but when we look at the 
world at large, we are compelled to say that it is a world whose aims, pleasures, pursuits, are 
earthly. Yet how vain are these pursuits! “All flesh is grass”; that is, like the grass it is liable to 
various casualties. If it abides to its utmost duration it soon withers and is gone. The blade when 
it has only just sprung above the ground may be trodden under foot, may be parched by the 
heat, cut off by the cold, or withered by the blight; may be plucked by the hand, or mowed down 
by the scythe; thus is it with man. No sooner does he appear in the world than some little 
casualty may at once deprive him of life. This is the state of all—“for all flesh is as grass, and all 
the goodliness thereof as the flower of the field”: “the wind passeth over it and it is gone, and the 
place thereof shall know it no more!” But is there no difference? Surely there are some 
distinctions. Yes, there are, and as Archbishop Leighton observes, this difference is beautifully 
expressed by the inspired writer—“the goodliness thereof is as the flower of the field.” When we 
enter a field, it is not so much the common blade which attracts the eye. It is the flower—those 
various beautiful ornaments with which the creative power of God has adorned the face of the 
earth. So there are various external embellishments which distinguish some from the ordinary 
race of men. Every soul, indeed, is of inestimable value. Still, it must be confessed that there are 
properties which some possess which are more attractive—youth, beauty, honours, talent. But 
what are they all? But the flower of the grass. They partake of the fading nature of the plants 
from which they spring. 
II. THE WORD OF GOD IS AS ABIDING AS HIMSELF; and this notwithstanding all the 
attempts that have been made, by wicked men instigated by evil spirits, to destroy it. This has 
been their constant aim, for the Word of God has been their constant dread. 
1. It abides in its doctrines. These are not evanescent theories, like some of the dicta of the 
philosophers; they are eternal truths. 
2. Its promises endure. Its sanctions also stand for ever; namely, the rewards and 
punishments which are there made known. Let those who are now surrounded with many 
temporal blessings regard them as flowers, which the goodness of God provides to sweeten 
their present path; still set not your hearts upon them; they are but short-lived gifts, fading 
flowers. There is but one flower that will never fade, “The Rose of Sharon.” (J. H.Stewart, M.
A.) 
 
 
The withering work of the Spirit  
(with 1Pe_1:23-25):—Something more than the decay of our material flesh is intended here; the 
carnal mind, the flesh in another sense, was intended by the Holy Ghost when He bade His 
messenger proclaim those words. It does not seem to me that a mere expression of the mortality 
of our race was needed in this place by the context; it would hardly keep pace with the sublime 
revelations which surround it, and would in some measure be a digression from the subject in 
hand. The notion that we are here simply and alone reminded of our mortality does not square 
with the New Testament exposition of it in Peter. Look at the chapter in Isaiah with care. What 
is the subject of it? It is the Divine consolation of Zion. The Lord, to remove her sorrow, bids His 
prophets announce the coming of the long-expected Deliverer, the end and accomplishment of 
all her warfare, and the pardon of all her iniquity. Further, there is no sort of question that the 
prophet goes on to foretell the coming of John the Baptist as the harbinger of the Messiah. The 
object of the coming of the Baptist, and the mission of the Messiah whom he heralded, was the 
manifestation of Divine glory (verse 5). Well, what next? Was it needful to mention man’s 
mortality in this connection? We think not. But there is much more appropriateness in the 

succeeding verses, if we see their deeper meaning. Do they not mean this? In order to make 
room for the display of the Divine glory in Christ Jesus and His children there would come a 
withering of all the glory wherein man boasts himself; the flesh should be seen in its true nature 
as corrupt and dying, and the grace of God alone should be exalted. This would be seen under 
the ministry of John the Baptist first, and should be the preparatory work of the Holy Ghost in 
men’s hearts, in all time, in order that the glory of the Lord should be revealed and human pride 
be for ever confounded. The Spirit blows upon the flesh, and that which seemed vigorous 
becomes weak, that which was fair to look upon is smitten with decay. The withering before the 
sowing was very marvellously fulfilled in the preaching of John the Baptist. When our Lord 
Himself actually appeared, He came into a withered land whose glories had all departed. But I 
am coming to your own ]personal histories. In every one of us it must be fulfilled that all that is 
of the flesh m us, seeing it is but as grass, must be withered, and the comeliness thereof must be 
destroyed. 
I. Turning, then, to THE WORK OF THE SPIRIT IN CAUSING THE GOODLINESS OF THE 
FLESH TO FADE, let us— 
1. Observe that the work of the Holy Spirit upon the soul of man in withering up that which 
is of the flesh is very unexpected. In our text even the speaker himself, though doubtless one 
taught of God, when he was bidden to cry, said, “What shall I cry?” Even he did not know 
that in order to the comforting of God’s people there must first be experienced a preliminary 
visitation. Many preachers of God’s Gospel have forgotten that the law is the schoolmaster to 
bring men to Christ. They have sown on the unbroken fallow ground, and forgotten that the 
plough must break the clods. Preachers have laboured to make Christ precious to those who 
think themselves rich and increased in goods; and it has been labour in vain. It is our duty to 
preach Jesus Christ even to self-righteous sinners, but it is certain that Jesus Christ will 
never be accepted by them while they hold themselves in high esteem. Wherever there is a 
real work of grace in any soul, it begins with a pulling down: the Holy Ghost does not build 
on the old foundation. The convincing work of the Spirit, wherever it comes, is unexpected, 
and even to the child of God, in whom this process has still to go on, it is often startling. We 
begin again to build that which the Spirit of God has destroyed. Having begun in the Spirit, 
we act as if we would be made perfect in the flesh; and then, when our mistaken upbuilding 
has to be levelled with the earth, we are almost as astonished as we were when first the 
scales fell from our eyes. 
2. Furthermore, this withering is after the usual order of the Divine operation. Observe, the 
method of creation. There seems to be every probability that this world has been fitted up 
and destroyed, refitted and then destroyed again, many times before the last arranging of it 
for the habitation of men. What was there in the beginning? Originally, nothing. There was 
no trace of another’s plan to interfere with the great Architect. The earth was, as the Hebrew 
puts it, Tohu and Bohu, disorder and confusion—in a word, chaos. So it is in the new 
creation. When the Lord new creates us, He borrows nothing from the old man, but makes 
all things new. Take another instance from the ways of God. When man has fallen, when did 
the Lord bring him the Gospel? The first whisper of the Gospel was, “I will put enmity 
between thee and the woman, between thy seed and her seed. He shall bruise thy head.” 
That whisper came to man shivering in the presence of his Maker, having nothing more to 
say by way of excuse; but standing guilty before the Lord. If you will pursue the meditation 
upon the acts of God with men, you will constantly see the same thing. God has given us a 
wonderful type of salvation in Noah’s ark; but Noah was saved in that ark in connection with 
death; he himself, as it were, immured alive in a tomb, and all the world besides left to 
destruction. All other hope for Noah was gone, and then the ark rose upon the waters. 
Remember the redemption of the children of Israel out of Egypt: it occurred when they were 
in the saddest plight, and their cry went up to heaven by reason of their bondage. As in the 

backwoods of America before there can be tillage, the planting of cities, the arts of 
civilisation, and the transactions of commerce, the woodman’s axe must hack and hew: the 
stately trees of centuries must fall: the roots must be burned, the old reign of nature 
disturbed,—even thus the Lord takes away the first, that He may establish the second. As it 
has been outwardly, we ought to expect that it would be within us. 
3. We are taught in our text how universal this process is in its range over the hearts of all 
those upon whom the Spirit works. The withering is a withering of what? Of part of the flesh 
and some portion of its tendencies? Nay, “All flesh is grass; and all the goodliness thereof”—
the very choice and pick of it—“is as the flower of the field,” and what happens to the grass? 
Does any of it live? “The grass withereth,” all of it. The flower, will not that abide? So fair a 
thing, has not that an immortality? No, it utterly falls away. So, wherever the Spirit of God 
breathes on the soul of man, there is a withering of everything that is of the flesh, and it is 
seen that to be carnally minded is death. Wherever the Spirit of God comes, our 
righteousness withers as our sinfulness. There is much more to be destroyed, and, among 
the rest, away must go our boasted power of resolution. Still the man will say, “I believe I 
have, after all, within myself an enlightened conscience and an intelligence that will guide 
me aright. The light of nature I will use, and I do not doubt that if I wander somewhat I shall 
find my way back again.” Ah, man! thy wisdom, which is the very flower of thy nature, what 
is it but folly, though thou knowest it not? When the withering wind of the Spirit moves over 
the carnal mind, it reveals the death of the flesh in all respects, especially in the matter of 
power towards that which is good. We then learn that word of our Lord, “Without Me ye can 
do nothing.” 
4. Notice the completeness of this withering work within us. The grass, what does it do? 
Droop? nay, wither. The flower of the field: does it hang its head a little? No, according to 
Isaiah, it fades; and according to Peter, it falleth away. There is no reviving it with showers, it 
has come to its end. Even thus are the awakened led to see that in their flesh there dwelleth 
no good thing. What dying and withering work some of God’s servants have had in their 
souls! Look at John Bunyan, as he describes himself in his Grace Abounding! For how many 
months and even years was the Spirit engaged in writing death upon all that was the old 
Bunyan, in order that he might become by grace a new man fitted to track the pilgrims along 
their heavenly way. The old nature never does improve. 
5. All this withering work in the soul is painful. As you read these verses, do they not strike 
you as having a very funereal tone? “All flesh is grass, and all the goodliness thereof is as the 
flower of the field: the grass withereth, the flower fadeth.” This is mournful work, but it must 
be done. Those who experience much of it when they first come to Christ have great reason 
to be thankful. Persons who come to Christ with but comparatively little knowledge of their 
own depravity, have to learn it afterwards, and they remain for a long time babes in Christ, 
and are perplexed with matters that would not have troubled them if they had experienced a 
deeper work at first. 
6. Although this is painful, it is inevitable. Why does the grass wither? Because it is a 
withering thing. “Its root is ever in its grave, and it must die.” How could it spring out of the 
earth, and be immortal? Every supposed good thing that grows out of your own self, is like 
yourself, mortal, and it must die. The seeds of corruption are in all the fruits of manhood’s 
tree; let them be as fair to look upon as Eden’s clusters, they must decay. 
7. This last word by way of comfort to any that are passing through the process we are 
describing. It gives me great joy when I hear that you unconverted ones are very miserable, 
for the miseries which the Holy Spirit works are always the prelude to happiness. It is the 
Spirit’s work to wither. “Because the Spirit of the Lord bloweth upon it.” What doth the Lord 
say? “I kill.” But what next? “I make alive.” He never makes any alive but those He kills. 

II. THE IMPLANTATION. According to Peter, although the flesh withers, and the flower thereof 
falls away, yet in the children of God there is an unwithering something of another kind. “Being 
born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the Word of God, which liveth and 
abideth for ever.” “The Word of the Lord endureth for ever. And this is the word which by the 
Gospel is preached unto you.” The Gospel is of use to us because it is not of human origin. If it 
were of the flesh, all it could do for us would not land us beyond the flesh; but the Gospel of 
Jesus Christ is superhuman, Divine, and spiritual. If you believe a Gospel which you have 
thought out for yourself, or a philosophical Gospel which comes from the brain of man, it is of 
the flesh, and will wither, and you will die, and be lost through trusting in it. The only word that 
can bless you and be a seed in your soul must be the living and incorruptible Word of the eternal 
Spirit. Do you receive it? Then the Holy Spirit implants it in your soul. And what is the result of 
it? There comes a new life as the result of the indwelling of the living Word, and our being born 
again by it. A new life it is; not the old nature putting out its better parts; not the old Adam 
refining and purifying itself, and rising to something better. Wherever this new life comes 
through the Word, it is incorruptible, it lives for ever. (C. H.Spurgeon.) 
 
 
The transitory and the durable 
I. THE TRANSITORY NATURE OF ALL EARTHLY THINGS. Consid er some of those things 
which constitute the goodliness and the glory of man, and see how they justify the assertion in 
the text. 
1. Personal endowments of beauty and of form. We make our boast of beauty: of the 
sparkling eye, of comely features. Small is our cause for boast! That body which seemed to 
concentrate in it all that was beautiful, see it when wasted by accidents and by time, when 
blasted by the touch of death! 
2. The text may be illustrated by adverting to the wisdom, as well as to the beauty and 
strength of man. Since the attention of man was first directed to the objects of nature, what 
an innumerable succession has there been of notions, of systems, of theories. And yet we 
look on these ill-digested systems as belonging only to days which are gone by, and as now 
utterly exploded. For the fact is, that all knowledge, except that which is derived from the 
Bible, is destined to pass away. 
3. Advert to the transitory nature of those things which are the produce of the imagination 
and taste. Whatever the pencil of the painter has portrayed; whatever the chisel of the 
sculptor has wrought; whatever the skill of the architect has reared,—all these are destined 
shortly to be destroyed. This should convey a very forcible reproof to those who expend so 
large a portion of their time in the embellishments of life, in dress, and in furniture, and in 
equipages. 
4. In reference to the possessions of men,—wealth and fortune, and their concomitants—
grandeur, eminence, pomp, and luxury. 
5. As strikingly is this illustrated by the emptiness of that shapeless thing,—that shadow of 
ashade called fame. 
6. See it illustrated, also, as to dominion and power. Kingdoms and empires rise and fall—
flourish and decay. 
7. The world itself is an illustration of the sentiment. 
II. THE DURABILITY OF THAT DISPENSATION WITH WHICH GOD  HAS BEEN PLEASED 
TO BLESS THE WORLD. The “Word of our God shall stand for ever.” This sentiment is greatly 
illustrated, and abundantly confirmed, by— 

1. The utter impotence of persecution. 
2. The utter failure of the opposition of infidelity. 
3. The blessed and delightful spread given to it in our day. 
4. The dispensation of truth with which God has blessed the world is the dispensation of the 
Spirit. The Word of our God is a living word; it is not only a dispensation of words, 
addressed to the understanding and will, but a dispensation of the Spirit coming to the heart 
of man. (J. Bromley.) 
 
 
Israel’s oppressors; Jehovah’s promise 
The words are of universal import; but the connection shows the sense in which they are here 
used by the prophet. Israel’s oppressors are mortal: the promise of Jehovah—such a promise, 
namely, as that contained in Isa_40:4-5 —remains sure. (Prof. S. R. Driver, D. D.) 
 
 
The abiding Word 
I. THE WEAK AND PERISHABLE NATURE OF THINGS OF EARTH. T he word translated 
“goodliness” signifies excellency. Every sort of excellency. Is it external? Beauty of person, 
strength of frame, the influence which rank, title, wealth, power, family bestow? It is but as 
grass, the withering flower. Is it internal? The highest order of intellect, the finest imagination, 
the soundest judgment, most retentive memory? But the word is wider still. It takes in all moral 
excellency, truth, justice, benevolence, morality, and all the external decencies of that sort of 
religion which often is taken for the true religion of the heart, yet is not such. It embraces that in 
which we are so prone to confide, human power, our own wisdom; all are as grass, as separated 
from the Word of God, and the regenerating power of the Holy Spirit. The wind of deep inward 
temptation, of sore trial, does but pass over it, and it is gone. If man deal with us, we find it 
sometimes a very solemn thing, how much more when God deals with us. When He comes in the 
convincing power of His Spirit, in the solemn hour of death, and in the thoughts of immediate 
appearance before Him, ah! how wither then the flowers that have seemed the fairest. But in the 
midst of all that fades and perishes and is not, there is, blessed be God, that which standeth for 
ever. 
II. THE ABIDING CHARACTER OF “THE WORD OF OUR GOD.” Thi s is true in whatever 
sense we take it. Is it the decree of God? (Isa_46:10.) Is it His written and revealing Word? 
(Isa_55:9-10.) Is it His law? Mat_5:18.) But by “the Word” here, is especially and pre-eminently 
meant the Gospel (1Pe_1:23-25). The Gospel stands upon the immutable perfections of God. 
There is not an attribute that does not uphold it. “The Word of our God shall stand for ever.” It 
shall stand amidst all the instability of the creature, amidst all the faithlessness of man, amidst 
all the unfaithfulness and unbelief of our own hearts. Is the grass to be despised, the flower to be 
scorned? Be thankful for them while you have them, admire that God who is in them, their chief 
Beauty, their only real Beauty. Be thankful, seek the right use of them by seeking to glorify God 
in them. Is it strength of body? strength of intellect? Use them for Him, and in His service. But 
remember, they fade as you behold, and wither as you use them. Hold them as perishable 
memorials of the imperishable God. How real are the blessings of the Gospel when realised in 
the soul! The righteousness of Christ. It stands, it is everlasting (Dan_9:24). Consolation is 
everlasting (2Th_2:16). Light, everlasting Isa_60:19). Love, everlasting (Jer_31:3). Life, eternal 
Rom_6:23). The blessings in the Gospel are durable riches, because the Gospel endureth. Why 
is it that there is so much instability among many that yet are true believers? They are not 
rooted and grounded in Christ. (J. H. Brans, M. A.) 

 
 
 
 
7 The grass withers and the flowers fall, 
    because the breath of the Lord blows on them. 
    Surely the people are grass. 
 
1.BARNES, “The grass withereth - Soon withers. Its beauty is soon gone. 
The flower fadeth - Soon fades; or fades when the wind of Yahweh passes over it. So is also 
with man. He loses his vigor, and dies at once when Yahweh takes away his strength and beauty. 
Because the spirit of the Lord bloweth upon it - This should be rendered, undoubtedly, 
‘When the wind of Yahweh bloweth upon it.’ The word ‘spirit’ here does not suit the connection, 
and does not express the idea of the prophet. The word 
חור  _ut ex means, properly, “breath” - a 
breathing, or blowing; and is often used indeed to denote spirit, soul, life. But it often means a 
breath of wind; a breeze; air in motion Job_41:8; Jer_2:24; Jer_14:6. It is applied to the cool 
breeze which springs up in the evening (Gen_3:8; compare Son_2:17; Son_4:6). It sometimes 
means a strong and violent wind Gen_8:1; Isa_7:2; Isa_41:16; and also a tempest, or hurricane 
Job_1:19; Job_30:15; Isa_27:8. The ‘wind of Yahweh’ means that which Yahweh sends, or 
causes; and the expression here refers, doubtless, to the hot or poisonous east winds which blow 
in Oriental countries, and which wither and dry up everything before them (compare Jon_4:8). 
Surely the people is grass - Lowth reads this, ‘this people;’ referring to the Jewish nation. 
So the Syriac. Perhaps it refers to the people of Babylon (so Rosenmuller), and means that 
mighty people would fade away like grass. But the more probable interpretation is that which 
regards it as referring to all people, and of course including the Jews and the Babylonians. The 
sense, according to this view, is, ‘all nations shall fade away. All human power shall cease. But 
the promise of Yahweh shall survive. It shall be unchanging amidst all revolutions; it shall 
survive all the fluctuations which shall take place among people. It may, therefore, be trusted 
with unwavering reliance.’ To produce that reliance was the object of the proclamation. On this 
passage, descriptive of the state of man, the reader will at once be reminded of the beautiful 
language of Shakespeare: 
This is the state of man! Today he puts forth 
The tender leaves of hope: to-morrow blossoms, 
And bears his blushing honors thick upon him; 
The third day comes a frost, a killing frost, 
And when he thinks, good easy man, full surely 

His greatness is a-ripening, nips his root, 
And then he falls -  
 - Never to hope again. 
Hen. VIII, Act. ii. Sc. 2.
In the following passage from Tasso, the same image is adopted: 
The gentle budding rose (quoth he) behold, 
That first scant peeping forth with virgin beams, 
Half ope, half shut, her beauties doth up-fold 
In their dear leaves, and less seen fairer seems, 
And after spreads them forth more broad and bold, 
Then languishes and dies in last extremes. 
So in the passing of a day doth pass 
The bud and blossom of the life of man, 
Nor e’er doth flourish more, but, like the grass 
Cut down, becometh withered, pale, and wan. 
Fairfax, Edit. Windsor, 1817.

 
2. CLARKE, “
The grass withereth - The whole of this verse is wanting in three of 
Kennicott’s and five of De Rossi’s MSS., and in a very correct and ancient MS. of my own, and 
also in the Septuagint and Arabic. 
Surely the people “Verily this people” - So the Syriac; who perhaps read 
םעה3הזה  haam3
hazzeh. 
Because the spirit of the Lord “When the wind of Jehovah” - חור3הוהי  ruach3Jehovah, a 
wind of Jehovah, is a Hebraism, meaning no more than a strong wind. It is well known that a 
hot wind in the east destroys every green thing. Compare Psa_103:16. Two MSS. omit the word 
הוהי  Yehovah, Jehovah. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
The grass withereth, the flower fadeth,.... And so does man, and all his glory 
and goodliness:  
 
because the Spirit of the Lord bloweth upon it: alluding to some impetuous and blasting 
wind blowing upon herbs and flowers, to the withering and fading of them; see 
Psa_103:15, legal 
ordinances ceased upon the pouring forth of the Spirit. The external excellencies of men, or their 
outward advantages, perish at the breath of God, at the blast of his nostrils, when taken away by 
death; and at conversion the Spirit of the Lord blows a blast upon all the goodliness of man; the 
operations of the Spirit are compared to wind, Joh_3:8, which, like that, are free, and, as he 
pleases, are invisible and imperceptible, land powerful and efficacious, and these cause a 
withering in men's goodness; the Spirit of God shows that their holiness is not true holiness; 
that their righteousness has only the appearance of one before men; and their religion and 
godliness a mere form; and their good works, "splendida peccata", shining sins; that those are 

insufficient to justify and save, and bring to heaven; upon which they fade away and die in their 
esteem, who now reckon them but loss and dung, Phi_3:6, "surely the people is grass"; the 
people of the Jews, with all their external advantages; yea, all people, with all the excellencies of 
human nature, or considered in their best estate, possessed of all that is reckoned good and 
great, being but mere natural men. The Targum restrains this to the ungodly, as it does the 
former verse, rendering it,  
 
"as grass the wicked among the people are esteemed;''  
 
as it does the former, thus,  
 
"the wicked are as grass, and their strength as the stubble of the field.''  
 
So Kimchi interprets them of the nations that come with Gog and Magog; and Jarchi of the 
princes of the kingdoms; but very wrongly, since it is true of all flesh, or of all mankind. 
 
4. HENRY, “ 
5. JAMISON, “
spirit of the Lord — rather, “wind of Jehovah” (
Psa_103:16). The withering 
east wind of those countries sent by Jehovah (Jon_4:8). 
the people — rather, “this people” [Lowth], which may refer to the Babylonians 
[Rosenmuller]; but better, mankind in general, as in Isa_42:5, so Isa_40:6, “all flesh”; this
whole race, that is, man. 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “7.The grass is withered. This might be understood to relate to the beauty of the fields,
which is spoiled by a single gust of wind, as it is said, (Psa_103:16,) “ soon as the wind passeth over it, it
is gone;” for we know that the wind is called “ Spirit of God” in other passages. But I am more inclined to
think that the metaphor is adapted to the present subject; for otherwise the application of it would be
somewhat obscure. The Prophet therefore explains what object he has in view, by saying that men, with
all their glory, are nothing else than grass; theft is, because the Spirit of God will quickly carry them away
by a single breath.

Because the Spirit of Jehovah hath blown upon it. The meaning may be thus explained, “ illustrious are
the gifts with which men are endowed, yet as soon as the Spirit of God shall blow upon them, they shall
fed that they are nothing.” For the false confidence with which they intoxicate themselves springs from
this source, that they do not appear before God, but, in order to indulge freely in flattering themselves,
creep into places of concealment. That they may no longer deceive themselves by a foolish delight in
falsehood, the Prophet drags them into the presence of God, and admits that apparently they flourish,
when they have been withdrawn from God; but as soon as the Lord has breathed upon them, all their
strength and beauty perish and decay.

But it may be thought that he assigns to “ Spirit of God” an office which is greatly at variance with his
nature; for it belongs to him “ renew by his power the face of the earth.” (Psa_104:30.) On the other hand,
if the Lord withdraw his Spirit, all is reduced to nothing. Here Isaiah asserts what is exceedingly different,
and appears to contradict David. But there is no absurdity in saying that all things are renewed by the
power of the Spirit, and again, that what formerly appeared to be something is reduced to nothing; for we

are nothing but in God, and, in order that we may begin to be something in him, we must first be
convinced, and made thoroughly to know, that we are vanity. Therefore does the Lord breathe upon us,
that we may know that of ourselves we are nothing.

Surely the people is grass. The Prophet added this, that all might know that he was not speaking of
foreigners, but of that people which gloried in the name of God; for the Jews might have thought that they
were more excellent, and held a higher rank than other men, and that on this account they ought to be
exempted from the common lot. He therefore addresses theta expressly and by name, that they may not
claim anything for themselves above others; as if he had said, that they would act wisely if, through a
conviction of their poverty, they should cast away all confidence in themselves. In a word, the Prophet,
after having mentioned consolation, shews in what way men must be prepared to receive it; for they are
not capable of it till they have formerly been reduced to nothing. Our hardness must therefore be
softened, our haughtiness must be east down and laid low, our boasting must be put to shame, and our
hearts must be subdued and humbled, if we wish to receive with any advantage the consolations which
the prophets bring to us by the command of God.  
 
 
8 The grass withers and the flowers fall, 
    but the word of our God endures forever.” 
 
1.BARNES, “The grass withereth ... - This is repeated from the former verse for the sake 
of emphasis, or strong confirmation. 
But the word of our God - The phrase ‘word of our God,’ refers either to his promise to be 
the protector and deliverer of his people in their captivity, or, in general, means that all his 
promises shall be firm and unchanging. 
Shall stand for ever - Amidst all revolutions among men, his promise shall be firm. It shall 
not only live amidst the changes of dynasties, and the revolutions of empires, but it shall 
continue forever and ever. This is designed for support to an afflicted and oppressed people; and 
it must have been to them, in their bondage, the source of high consolation. But it is equally so 
now. Amidst all the changes on earth; the revolutions of empires; the vanishing of kingdoms, 
God is the same, and his promises are unfailing. We see the grass wither at the return of 
autumn, or in the drought: we see the flower of the field lose its beauty, and decay; we see man 
rejoicing in his vigor and his health, cut down in an instant; we see cities fall, and kingdoms lose 
their power and vanish from among nations, but God changes not. He presides in all these 
revolutions, and sits calm and unmoved amidst all these changes. Not one of his promises shall 
fail; and at the end of all the changes which human things shall undergo, Yahweh, the God of his 
people, will be the same. 
 
 

2. GILL, “The grass withereth, the flower fadeth,.... Which is repeated, to raise attention 
to it, as being a matter of importance, and for the confirmation of it: 
 
 
but the word of our God shall stand for ever; the Apostle Peter adds, by way of 
explanation,  
 
and this is the word, which by the Gospel is preached unto you; who seems to 
distinguish the word from the Gospel, by which it is preached, and to intend Christ the essential 
Word; who stands or abides for ever as a divine Person; in his office as Mediator, being Prophet, 
Priest, and King for ever; in the efficacy of his blood, righteousness, and sacrifice; and in the 
fulness of his grace: it is true of the written word or Gospel, which remains, is everlasting, and 
will stand and continue, notwithstanding the persecutions of tyrants, the craft of false teachers, 
the reproach of ungodly men, and the death of the best of men, even of ministers; though all 
flesh is grass, fading and withering, the word of God is fresh and lively, firm and durable; and so 
it is as transcribed into the hearts of men, where it becomes the ingrafted word, and issues in 
everlasting life. It may be applied to God's word of promise, which is for ever settled in heaven, 
and is always fulfilled. 
 
3. HENRY, “
When this is done the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, 
Isa_40:5. (1.) When the 
captives are prepared for deliverance Cyrus shall proclaim it, and those shall have the benefit of 
it, and those only, whose hearts the Lord shall stir up with courage and resolution to break 
through the discouragements that lay in their way, and to make nothing of the hills, and valleys, 
and all the rough places. (2.) When John Baptist has for some time preached repentance, 
mortification, and reformation, and so made ready a people prepared for the Lord (Luk_1:17), 
then the Messiah himself shall be revealed in his glory, working miracles, which John did not, 
and by his grace, which is his glory, binding up and healing with consolations those whom John 
had wounded with convictions. And this revelation of divine glory shall be a light to lighten the
Gentiles. All flesh shall see it together, and not the Jews only; they shall see and admire it, see it 
and bid it welcome; as the return out of captivity was taken notice of by the neighbouring 
nations, Psa_126:2. And it shall be the accomplishment of the word of God, not one iota or tittle 
of which shall fall to the ground: The mouth of the Lord has spoken it, and therefore the hand of 
the Lord will effect it. 
II. By confidence in the word of the Lord, and not in any creature. The mouth of the Lord
having spoken it, the voice has this further to cry (he that has ears to hear let him hear it), The
word of our God shall stand for ever, Isa_40:8. 
1. By this accomplishment of the prophecies and promises of salvation, and the performance 
of them to the utmost in due time, it appears that the word of the Lord is sure and what may be 
safely relied on. Then we are prepared for deliverance when we depend entirely upon the word 
of God, build our hopes on that, with an assurance that it will not make us ashamed: in a 
dependence upon this word we must be brought to own that all flesh is grass, withering and 
fading. (1.) The power of man, when it does appear against the deliverance, is not to be feared; 
for it shall be as grass before the word of the Lord: it shall wither and be trodden down. The 
insulting Babylonians, who promise themselves that the desolations of Jerusalem shall be 
perpetual, are but as grass which the spirit of the Lord blows upon, makes nothing of, but blasts 
all its glory; for the word of the Lord, which promises their deliverance, shall stand for ever, and 
it is not in the power of their enemies to hinder the execution of it. (2.) The power of man, when 
it would appear for the deliverance, is not to be trusted to; for it is but as grass in comparison 
with the word of the Lord, which is the only firm foundation for us to build our hope upon. 

When God is about to work salvation for his people he will take them off from depending upon 
creatures, and looking for it from hills and mountains. They shall fail them, and their 
expectations from them shall be frustrated: The Spirit of the Lord shall blow upon them; for 
God will have no creature to be a rival with him for the hope and confidence of his people; and, 
as it is his word only that shall stand for ever, so in that word only our faith must stand. When 
we are brought to this, then, and not till then, we are fit for mercy. 
2. The word of our God, that glory of the Lord which is now to be revealed, the gospel, and 
that grace which is brought with it to us and wrought by it in us, shall stand for ever; and this is 
the satisfaction of all believers, when they find all their creature-comforts withering and fading 
like grass. Thus the apostle applies it to the word which by the gospel is preached unto us, and
which lives and abides for ever as the incorruptible seed by which we are born again, 
1Pe_1:23-25. To prepare the way of the Lord we must be convinced, (1.) Of the vanity of the 
creature, that all flesh is grass, weak and withering. We ourselves are so, and therefore cannot 
save ourselves; all our friends are so, and therefore are unable to save us. All the beauty of the 
creature, which might render it amiable, is but as the flower of grass, soon blasted, and therefore 
cannot recommend us to God and to his acceptance. We are dying creatures; all our comforts in 
this word are dying comforts, and therefore cannot be the felicity of our immortal souls. We 
must look further for a salvation, look further for a portion. (2.) Of the validity of the promise of 
God. We must be convinced that the word of the Lord can do that for us which all flesh cannot - 
that, forasmuch as it stands for ever, it will furnish us with a happiness that will run parallel 
with the duration of our souls, which must live for ever; for the things that are not seen, but 
must be believed, are eternal. 
 
 
4. SBC, “
The immediate, the historical purpose of these words is undoubtedly to reassure the 
Jews of the captivity. It was to men whose eyes were resting on the magnificence and power of 
Bablyon that Isaiah spoke, but of another land and out of an earlier age, the solemn words: "All 
flesh is grass, and all the beauty thereof is as the flower of the field." In contrast with the 
perishing life of the great empire city and its vast populations, Isaiah points to the "word of our 
God." That word, he says, "will stand for ever." 
I. By the word of our God—of Jehovah, the God of His people—Isaiah means, beyond doubt, in 
the first instance, the word of promise uttered in the desert by the inspired voice. The promise of 
the return from Babylon, the promise of the after-presence of Israel’s great Redeemer, would be 
verified. St. Peter detaches this text for us Christians from its immediate historical setting. He 
widens it; he gives it a strictly universal application. 
II. Isaiah refers to the grass as an emblem of the perishable and the perishing. In looking at it, 
we look at that which is at best a vanishing form, ready almost ere it is matured to be resolved 
into its elements, to sink back into the earth from which it sprang. As soon as we are born, says 
the wise man, we begin to draw to our end. That is true of the highest and of the lowest forms of 
natural life. Whatever else human life is, whatever else it may imply, it is soon over. It fades 
away suddenly like the grass. The frontiers of life do not change with the generations of men, as 
do its attendant circumstances. 
III. The word of the Lord endureth for ever. How do we know that? Certainly not in the same 
way as we know and are sure of the universality of death. We know it to be true if we believe two 
things: first, that God the perfect moral being exists; secondly, that He has spoken to man. If He 
is eternal then that which He proclaims as His truth and will, will bear on it the mark of His 
eternity. The word of God, speaking in conscience, speaking in revelation, is like God Himself 
above the waterfloods of change; it lasts. While men differ from each other about His word, it 

remains what it was, hidden, it may be, like our December sun,—hidden behind the clouds of 
speculation, or behind the clouds of controversy, but in itself unchanged, unchangeable. "Thy 
word, O Lord, endureth for ever in heaven." 
H. P. Liddon, Penny Pulpit, No. 706 
 
 
 
"Hast thou not known?" This is not a new revelation. It is an appeal to memory, and that is a 
strong point in all the Divine pleading. Our memory is to be as the prophet of the Lord in our 
life. Recollection is to be inspiration; the forty years gone are a pledge of the forty years to come. 
Let a man be faithful to his own recollections, and it is impossible he can long be despondent, 
weary and slow of heart, to lay hold of the great work and discipline of life. 
I. Is God almighty? (1) Then do not fear for the stability of His works. (2) Have no fear about the 
realisation of His promises. (3) Do not imagine you can escape His judgments. (4) Be assured 
that the throne of right shall stand upon the ruins of all wrong. 
II. God is not only powerful, but all wise. There is no searching of His understanding. Infinite 
strength would terrify us, but infinite strength under the dominion of infinite mind recovers us 
from the tremendous shock which comes of. abstract, immeasurable, unwasting strength. Is God 
all-wise? (1) Then the darkest providences have meaning. (2) His plan of salvation is complete 
and final, and we shall waste our strength and show how great is our folly by all attempts to 
improve the method of redemption and recovery of the world. (3) Our individual life is all 
understood by Him. That life is but dimly known to ourselves. We catch glimpses of it here and 
there, but its scope and meaning are still unrevealed to us. It is enough that God knows our life, 
and that His wisdom is pledged as our defence. (4) We have a guarantee of endless variety in our 
future studies and services. God is ever extending our knowledge of His works, in reward of the 
endeavours we are making to acquaint ourselves with the wonders by which we are enclosed. 
III. The subject forces upon us the solemn enquiry: What is our relation to this dread Being, 
whose power is infinite, and whose wisdom is past finding out? We must sustain some relation 
to Him. We are the loyal subjects of His crown, or rebels in His empire. Pause and determine the 
answer. Everything depends upon our relation to the cross of Jesus Christ. 
Parker, City Temple, 1870, p. 349. 
References: Isa_40:8.—G. G. Bradley, Christian World Pulpit, vol. xxiii., p.  
5. NISBET, “I. By the word of our God—of Jehovah, the God of His people.—Isaiah means,
beyond doubt, in the first instance, the word of promise uttered in the desert by the inspired voice. The
promise of the return from Babylon, the promise of the after?presence of Israel’s great Redeemer, would
be verified. St. Peter detaches this text for us Christians from its immediate historical setting. He widens it;
he gives it a strictly universal application.

II. Isaiah refers to the grass as an emblem of the perishable and the perishing.—In looking at it, we
look at that which is at best a vanishing form, ready almost ere it is matured to be resolved into its
elements, to sink back into the earth from which it sprang. As soon as we are born, says the wise man,
we begin to draw to our end. That is true of the highest and of the lowest forms of natural life. Whatever
else human life is, whatever else it may imply, it is soon over. It fades away suddenly like the grass. The
frontiers of life do not change with the generations of men, as do its attendant circumstances.

III. The word of the Lord endureth for ever.—How do we know that? Certainly not in the same way as

we know and are sure of the universality of death. We know it to be true if we believe two things: first, that
God the perfect moral being exists; secondly, that He has spoken to man. While men differ from each
other about His Word, it remains what it was, hidden, it may be, like our December sun—hidden behind
the clouds of speculation, or behind the clouds of controversy, but in itself unchanged, unchangeable.
‘Thy word, O Lord! endureth for ever in heaven.’ Canon Liddon.  
Illustration

‘These three verses contain a contrast between our transient human life and the permanence of God’s
Word. The fairest things it all nature are pointed to, the graceful grass, the starry flowers, which make the
Oriental fields so beautiful. They are images of the best and brightest human life. What splendour there
was in the days of Solomon, what luxury under Jehoiakim! And now it was all withered and faded.
Meanwhile, the word of our God shall stand for ever. Religion endures when business and pleasure fall
into decay. Ten years, they say, is about the average length of the feverish speculator’s business life, as
he rushes and pushes and shouts on ’Change. The Temple foundations remain in Jerusalem to?day, but
Solomon and all his glory have left not a wrack behind.’

 
6. CALVIN, “8.The grass withereth. This repetition is again added for the purpose of bringing to nought
the glory of the flesh, but at the same time contains within itself a highly valuable consolation, that God,
when he has cast down his people, immediately raises up and restores them. The context therefore runs
thus: “ grass indeed withereth and perisheth, but the word of the Lord endureth for ever.” After having
learned how empty and destitute we are of all blessings, how transitory and fading is the glory of the
flesh, the only consolation left for us, that we may be raised up by the word of the Lord, as by an
outstretched hand, is, that we are frail and fading, but that the word of the Lord is durable and eternal,
and, in a word, that the life which we need is offered to us from another quarter.

But the word of our God shall stand for ever. This passage comprehends the whole Gospel in few words;
for it consists of an acknowledgment of our misery, poverty, and emptiness, that, being sincerely
humbled, we may fly to God, by whom alone we shall be perfectly restored. Let not men therefore faint or
be discouraged by the knowledge of their nakedness and emptiness; for the eternal word is exhibited to
them by which they may be abundantly supported and upheld. We are likewise taught that we ought not
to seek consolation from any other source than from eternity, which ought not to be sought anywhere else
than in God; since nothing that is firm or durable will be found on the earth. Nothing is more foolish than
to rest satisfied with the present state, which we see to be fleeting; and every man is mistaken who hopes
to be able to obtain perfect happiness till he has ascended to God, whom the Scripture calls eternal, in
order that we may know that life flows to us from him; and indeed he adopts us to be his children on this
condition, to make us partakers of his immortality.

But this would be of no avail, if the manner of seeking him were not pointed out; and therefore he
exhibits the word, from which we must not in any respect turn aside; for if we make the smallest departure
from it, we shall be involved in strange labyrinths, and shall find no way of extricating ourselves. Now, the
word is called eternal, not merely in itself, but in us; and this ought to be particularly observed, because
otherwise we could obtain no consolation. And thus Peter, a faithful expounder of this passage, applies it
to us, when he says that “ are regenerated by this incorruptible seed, that is,” says he, “ the word which is
preached.” (1Pe_1:23.) Hence we infer, what I mentioned a little before, that life is prepared for the dead
who shall come thirsting to the fountain that is exhibited to them; for the power which is hid in God is
revealed to us by the word.  

 
 
9 You who bring good news to Zion, 
    go up on a high mountain. 
You who bring good news to Jerusalem,[c] 
    lift up your voice with a shout, 
lift it up, do not be afraid; 
    say to the towns of Judah, 
    “Here is your God!” 
 
1.BARNES, “O Zion, that bringest good tidings - This is evidently the continuance of 
what the ‘voice’ said, or of the annunciation which was to give joy to an afflicted and oppressed 
people. There has been, however, much diversity of opinion in regard to the meaning of the 
passage. The margin renders it, ‘Thou that tellest good tidings to Zion,’ making Zion the 
receiver, and not the publisher of the message that was to convey joy. The Vulgate, in a similar 
way, renders it, ‘Ascend a high mountain, thou who bringest good tidings to Zion’ (qui 
evangelizas Zion). So the Chaldee, understanding this as an address to the prophet, as in 
Isa_40:1, ‘Ascend a high mountain, ye prophets, who bring glad tidings to Zion.’ So Lowth, 
Noyes, Gesenius. Grotius, and others. The word תרשׂבמ  m
e
bas'
e
ret, from רשׂב  v tH) _, means 
cheering with good tidings; announcing good news; bearing joyful intelligence. 
It is a participle in the feminine gender; and is appropriately applicable to some one that bears 
good tidings to Zion, and not to Zion as appointed to bear glad titlings. Lowth supposes that it is 
applicable to some female whose office it was to announce glad tidings, and says that it was the 
common practice for females to engage in the office of proclaiming good news. On an occasion 
of a public victory or rejoicing, it was customary, says he, for females to assemble together, and 
to celebrate it with songs, and dances, and rejoicings; and he appeals to the instance of Miriam 
and the chorus of women Exo_15:20-21, and to the instance where, after the victory of David 
over Goliath, ‘all the women came out of the cities of Israel singing and dancing to meet Saul’ 
1Sa_18:7. But there are objections to this interpretation; first, if this was the sense, the word 
would bare been in the plural number, since there is no instance in which a female is employed 
alone in this service; and, secondly, it was not, according to this, the office of the female to 

announce good tidings, or to communicate a joyful message, but to celebrate some occasion of 
triumph or victory. 
Grotius supposes that the word is ‘feminine in its sound, but common in its signification;’ and 
thus denotes any whose office it was to communicate glad tidings. Gesenius (Commentary in
loc.) says, that the feminine form here is used in a collective sense for םירשׂבמ  m
e
bas'
e
riym in the 
plural; and supposes that it thus refers to the prophets, or others who were to announce the glad 
tidings to Zion. Vitringa coincides with our translation, and supposes that the sense is, that Zion 
was to make proclamation to the other cities of Judah of the deliverance; that the news was first 
to be communicated to Jerusalem, and that Jerusalem was entrusted with the office of 
announcing this to the other cities of the land; and that the meaning is, that the gospel was to be 
preached first at Jerusalem, and then from Jerusalem as a center to the ether cities of the land, 
agreeably to Luk_24:49. In this view, also, Hengstenberg coincides (Christol. vol. i. p. 424). But 
that the former interpretation, which regards Zion as the receiver, and not the promulgator, of 
the intelligence, is the true one, is apparent, I think, from the following considerations: 
1. It is that which is the obvious and most correct construction of the Hebrew. 
2. It is that which is found in the ancient versions. 
3. It accords with the design of the passage. 
The main scope of the passage is not to call upon Jerusalem to make known the glad tidings, 
but it is to convey the good news to Jerusalem; to announce to her, lying desolate and waste, 
that her hard service was at an end, and that she was to be blessed with the return of happier 
and better times (see Isa_40:2). It would be a departure from this, to suppose that the subject 
was diverted in order to give Jerusalem a command to make the proclamation to the other cities 
of the land to say nothing of the impropriety of calling on a city to go up into a high mountain, 
and to lift up its voice. On the meaning of the word ‘Zion,’ see the note at Isa_1:8. 
Get thee up into a high mountain - You who make this proclamation to Zion. It was not 
uncommon in ancient times, when a multitude were to be addressed, or a proclamation to be 
made, for the crier to go into a mountain, where he could be seen and heard. Thus Jotham, 
addressing the men of Shechem, is said to have gone and ‘stood on the top of mount Gerizim, 
and lifted up his voice’ (Jdg_9:7; compare Mat_5:1). The sense is, that the messengers of the 
joyful news to Zion were to make themselves distinctly heard by all the inhabitants of the city, 
and of the land. 
Lift up thy voice - As with a glad and important message. Do not deliver the message as if 
you were afraid that it should be heard. It is one of joy; and it should be delivered in a clear, 
decided, animated manner, as if it were important that it should be heard. 
With strength - Aloud; with effort; with power (compare Isa_35:3-4). 
Lift it up - Lift up the voice. The command is repeated, to denote emphasis. The mind is full 
of the subject, and the prophet repeats the command, as a man often does when his mind is full 
of an idea. The command to deliver the message of God with animation, earnestness, and zeal is 
one that is not unusual in Isaiah. It should be delivered as if it were true, and as if it were 
believed to be true. This will not justify, however, boisterous preaching, or a loud and unnatural 
tone of voice - alike offensive to good taste, injurious to the health, and destructive of the life of 
the preacher. It is to be remarked, also, that this command to lift up the voice, pertains to the 
glad tidings of the gospel, and not to the terrors of wrath; to the proclamation of mercy, and not 
to the denunciation of woe. The glad tidings of salvation should be delivered in an animated and 
ardent manner; the future punishment of the wicked in a tone serious, solemn, subdued. 
Say unto the cities of Judah - Not to Jerusalem only, but to all the cities of the land. They 
were alike to be blessed on the return from the captivity - Mike in the preaching of the gospel. 

Behold your God! - Lo! your God returns to the city, the temple, and the land! Lo! he comes 
(note, Isa_40:3), conducting his people as a king to their land! Lo! he will come - under the 
Messiah in future times - to redeem and save! What a glad announcement was this to the 
desolate and forsaken cities of Judah! What a glad announcement to the wide world, ‘Lo! God 
has come to redeem and save; and the desolate world shall be visited with his salvation and 
smile, in his mercy through the Messiah!’ 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
O Zion, that bringest good tidings “O daughter, that bringest glad 
tidings to Zion” - That the true construction of the sentence is this, which makes Zion the 
receiver, not the publisher, of the glad tidings, which latter has been the most prevailing 
interpretation, will, I think, very clearly appear, if we rightly consider the image itself, and the 
custom and common practice from which it is taken. I have added the word daughter to express 
the feminine gender of the Hebrew participle, which I know not how to do otherwise in our 
language; and this is absolutely necessary in order to ascertain the image. For the office of 
announcing and celebrating such glad tidings as are here spoken of, belongs peculiarly to the 
women. On occasion of any great public success, a signal victory, or any other joyful event, it was 
usual for the women to gather together, and with music, dances, and songs, to publish and 
celebrate the happy news. Thus after the passage of the Red Sea, Miriam, and all the women, 
with timbrels in their hands, formed a chorus, and joined the men in their triumphant song, 
dancing, and throwing in alternately the refrain or burden of the song: -  
“Sing ye to Jehovah, for he is greatly exalted; 
The horse and his rider hath he cast into the sea.” 
Exo_15:20, Exo_15:21.
So Jephthah’s daughter collected a chorus or virgins, and with dances and songs came out to 
meet her father, and to celebrate his victory, Jdg_11:34. After David’s conquest of Goliath, “all 
the women came out of the cities of Israel singing and dancing to meet Saul, with tabrets, with 
joy, and with instruments of music;” and, forming themselves into two choruses, they sang 
alternately: -  
“Saul has slain his thousands: 
And David his ten thousands.” 
1Sa_18:6, 1Sa_18:7.
And this gives us the true sense of a passage in the sixty-eighth Psalm, which has frequently 
been misunderstood: -  
“Jehovah gave the word, (that is, the joyful news), 
The women, who published the glad tidings, were a great company; 
The kings of mighty armies did flee, did flee: 
And even the matron, who stayed at home, shared the spoil.” 
The word signifying the publishers of glad tidings is the same, and expressed in the same form 
by the feminine participle, as in this place, and the last distich is the song which they sang. So in 
this place, Jehovah having given the word by his prophet, the joyful tidings of the restoration of 
Zion, and of God’s returning to Jerusalem, (see Isa_52:8), the women are exhorted by the 
prophet to publish the joyful news with a loud voice from eminences, whence they might best be 
heard all over the country; and the matter and burden of their song was to be, “Behold your 
God!” See on Psa_68:11 (note). 

 
3. GILL, “
O Zion, that bringest good tidings,.... Or, "O thou that bringest good tidings to 
Zion 
(n)"; which rendering of the words is more agreeable to the latter part of the verse,  
 
say unto the cities of Judah, &c. and to some parallel places, Isa_41:27 and to the type, the 
deliverance of the Jews from Babylon; the tidings of which came from Babylon to Zion, or 
Jerusalem; and to the Targum which paraphrases the words thus,  
 
"O ye prophets, that bring good tidings to Zion;''  
 
and so may be applied to Gospel ministers, who bring the good tidings of the good will, grace, 
and favour of God, to men, through Christ; of the grace of Christ, in his suretyship engagements 
and performances; in his incarnation, sufferings, and death, and in his advocacy and 
intercession; and of the good things that come by him, as peace, pardon, righteousness, 
salvation, and eternal life:  
 
get thee up into the high mountain; to declare these good tidings, in the most open and 
public manner, that all might hear and receive them, and rejoice at them; it may also point at the 
place, the church of God, comparable to a high mountain for its visibility and immovableness, 
where the Gospel is to be published:  
 
O Jerusalem, that bringest good tidings: the church of God so called, to whom the faith of 
the Gospel is delivered, which is the pillar and ground of truth; which receives, retains, and 
maintains it, and sends forth ministers to proclaim it; particularly the first church at Jerusalem, 
where it was first preached, and from whence it went forth into other parts of Judea, and into all 
the world; here the apostles of Christ were, and from hence they set out, and published the 
Gospel all the world over, and who seem to be chiefly meant; for the words may be rendered, as 
the other clause, "O thou that bringest good tidings to Jerusalem (o)"; so the Targum: "lift up 
thy voice with strength"; or preach the Gospel with a strong voice, speak it out; do not mutter it 
over, or whisper it in a corner; proclaim it on the housetops, cry aloud that all may hear; lift up 
thy voice like a trumpet; blow the trumpet of the Gospel with all the strength thou hast; cause 
the joyful sound to be heard far and near:  
 
lift it up, and be not afraid; of the reproaches and revilings of men on account of it, or of 
their persecutions for it; or lest it should not be welcome, or be received as truth:  
 
say unto the cities of Judah; the inhabitants of them literally understood, and to the several 
churches and congregations of the saints everywhere:  
 
behold your God! that divine Person is come, that was promised, prophesied of, and 
expected; even Immanuel, God with us, God in our nature, God manifest in the flesh, God your 
Saviour, and who being God, truly God, is able to save to the uttermost; look to him with an eye 
of faith, and be saved; behold the Son of God, the Lamb of God, that has bore your sins, and took 
them away; behold him now, as your King and your God, on the throne, made and declared, 
Lord and Christ, crowned with glory and honour, on the same throne with his divine Father, 
having all power in heaven and earth; and let the echo of your faith be,  
 
my Lord and my God. The Targum is,  
 
"the kingdom of your God is revealed; see Mat_3:2.''  

 
4. HENRY, “
It was promised (
Isa_40:5) that the glory of the Lord shall be revealed; that is it 
with the hopes of which God's people must be comforted. Now here we are told, 
I. How it shall be revealed, Isa_40:9. 1. It shall be revealed to Zion and Jerusalem; notice shall 
be given of it to the remnant that are left in Zion and Jerusalem, the poor of the land, who were 
vine-dressers and husbandmen; it shall be told them that their brethren shall return to them. 
This shall be told also to the captives who belonged to Zion and Jerusalem, and retained their 
affection for them. Zion is said to dwell with the daughter of Babylon (Zec_2:7); and there she 
receives notice of Cyrus's gracious proclamation; and so the margin reads it, O thou that tellest
good tidings to Zion, etc., meaning the persons who were employed in publishing that 
proclamation; let them do it with a good will, let them make the country ring of it, and let them 
tell it to the sons of Zion in their own language, saying to them, Behold your God. 2. It shall be 
published by Zion and Jerusalem (so the text reads it); those that remain there, or that have 
already returned, when they find the deliverance proceeding towards perfection, let them 
proclaim it in the most public places, whence they may be best heard by all the cities of Judah; 
let them proclaim it as loudly as they can: let them lift up their voice with strength, and not be 
afraid of overstraining themselves; let them not be afraid lest the enemy should hear it and 
quarrel with them, or lest it should not prove true, or not such good tidings as at first it 
appeared; let them say to the cities of Judah, and all the inhabitants of the country, Behold your
God. When God is going on with the salvation of his people, let them industriously spread the 
news among their friends, let them tell them that it is God that has done it; whoever were the 
instruments, God was the author; it is their God, a God in covenant with them, and he does it as 
theirs, and they will reap the benefit and comfort of it. “Behold him, take notice of his hand in it, 
and look above second causes; behold, the God you have long looked for has come at last 
(Isa_25:9): This is our God, we have waited for him.” This may refer to the invitation which was 
sent forth from Jerusalem to the cities of Judah, as soon as they had set up an altar, immediately 
upon their return out of captivity, to come and join with them in their sacrifices, Ezr_3:2-4. 
“When the worship of God is set up again, send notice of it to all your brethren, that they may 
share with you in the comfort of it.” But this was to have its full accomplishment in the apostles' 
public and undaunted preaching of the gospel to all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. The voice 
crying in the wilderness gave notice that he was coming; but now notice is given that he has 
come. Behold the Lamb of God; take a full view of your Redeemer. Behold your King, behold 
your God.
 
5. JAMISON, “
Rather, “Oh, thou that bringest good things to Zion; thou that bringest good 
tidings to Jerusalem.” “Thou” is thus the collective personification of the messengers who 
announce God’s gracious purpose to Zion (see on 
Isa_40:1); Isa_52:7 confirms this [Vulgate 
and Gesenius]. If English Version be retained, the sense will be the glad message was first to be 
proclaimed to Jerusalem, and then from it as the center to all “Judea, Samaria, and the 
uttermost parts of the earth” (Luk_24:47, Luk_24:49; Act_1:8) [Vitringa and Hengstenberg]. 
mountain — It was customary for those who were about to promulgate any great thing, to 
ascend a hill from which they could be seen and heard by all (Jdg_9:7; Mat_5:1). 
be not afraid — to announce to the exiles that their coming return home is attended with 
danger in the midst of the Babylonians. The gospel minister must “open his mouth boldly” 
(Pro_29:25; Eph_6:19). 

Behold — especially at His second coming (Zec_12:10; Zec_14:5). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
The prophet accordingly now takes, as his standpoint, the time when Jehovah will 
already have come. “Upon a high mountain get thee up, O evangelistess Zion; lift up they voice
with strength, evangelistess Jerusalem: lift up, be not afraid; say to the cities of Judah, Behold
your God.” Knobel and others follow the lxx and Targum, and regard Zion and Jerusalem as 
accusatives of the object, viz., “preacher of salvation (i.e., a chorus of preachers) to Zion-
Jerusalem;” but such parallels as 
Isa_52:7 and Isa_62:11 are misleading here. The words are in 
apposition (A. S. Th. ε4αγγελιζο8ένη3Σιών). Zion-Jerusalem herself is called an evangelistess: the 
personification as a female renders this probable at the outset, and it is placed beyond all doubt 
by the fact, that it is the cities of Judah (the daughters of Zion-Jerusalem) that are to be 
evangelized. The prophet's standpoint here is in the very midst of the parousia. When 
Jerusalem shall have her God in the midst of her once more, after He has broken up His home 
there for so long a time; she is then, as the restored mother-community, to ascend a high 
mountain, and raising her voice with fearless strength, to bring to her daughters the joyful news 
of the appearance of their God. The verb 
bisser signifies literally to smooth, to unfold, then to 
make glad, more especially with joyful news. 
(Note: The verb 
bisser signifies primarily to stroke, rub, shave, or scratch the surface of 
anything; then to stroke off or rub off the surface, or anything which covers it; then, 
suggested by the idea of “rubbing smooth” (glatt), “to smooth a person” (jemanden glätten; 
compare the English, to gladden a person), i.e., vultum ejus diducere, to make him friendly 
and cheerful, or “to look smoothly upon a person,” i.e., to show him a friendly face; and also 
as an intransitive, “to be glad,” to be friendly and cheerful; and lastly, in a general sense, 
aliquid attingere, tractare, attrectare, to grasp or handle a thing (from which comes 
v tH t_, 
the flesh, as something tangible or material). In harmony with the Hebrew 
bisser 
(
Jer_20:15), they say in Arabic basarahu (or intensive, bassarahu) bi-o u.utQOs, he has 
gladdened him with the news of the birth of a son.) 
It lies at the root of the New Testament ε4αγγελίζειν (evangelize), and is a favourite word of the 
author of chapters 40-66, that Old Testament evangelist, though it is no disproof of Isaiah's 
authorship (cf., Nah_2:1). Hitherto Jerusalem has been in despair, bowed down under the 
weight of the punishment of her sins, and standing in need of consolation. But now that she has 
Jehovah with her again, she is to lift up her voice with the most joyful confidence, without 
further anxiety, and to become, according to her true vocation, the messenger of good tidings to 
all Judaea. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “9.Ascend on the high mountain. He proceeds with the same subject; for the Lord, having
formerly promised that he would give prophets who should soothe the grief and fear of the people by
promises, now commands that this consolation shall be more widely spread; because it is his pleasure to
diffuse his grace throughout the whole of Judea.

Lift up thy voice aloud, O Jerusalem. Formerly he had given to Jerusalem, and Zion the hope of this joyful
message; now he commands that the same voice shall be spread and shall be heard through other cities,

and, for this reason, gives orders that the loud voice shall be lifted up, and proclaimed from a lofty place.
Although by the words “” and “” he means the same thing, yet the repetition is emphatic; for he shews that
one city excels all other cities, for no other reason than because God hath chosen it to be his sanctuary.

That bringest tidings. He gives to the city this appellation, because there the priests and Levites were
instructed according to the injunctions of the Law, that they might be the teachers of the whole people,
and by their labors might spread the doctrine of salvation. (Mal_2:7.) Yet we ought carefully to observe
this commendation which God bestows on his Church, that it may not be without a clear mark of
distinction; for an assembly in which the preaching of heavenly doctrine is not heard does not deserve to
be reckoned a Church. In this sense also, Paul calls it (1Ti_3:15) “ pillar and foundation of the truth;” for
although God might have governed us by himself, and without the agency of men, yet he has assigned
this office to his Church, and has committed to it the invaluable treasure of his Word. For the same
reason it will be called in another passage, “ mother of all believers.” (Isa_54:1; Gal_4:26.) Hence it
follows that nothing is more absurd and wicked than for dumb idols to boast of the name of the Church,
as is done in Popery.

We are likewise taught, that the Church has not been instructed by God, in order that she may keep her
knowledge hidden within herself, but that she may publish what she has learned. Besides, he commands
that grace shall be freely and boldly proclaimed, that prophets and teachers may not speak with timidity,
as if it were a doubtful matter, but may shew that they are fully convinced of the certainty of those things
which they promise, because they know well that “ who cannot lie,” (Titus 1:2,) is the Author of them. He
enjoins the witnesses of his grace to proceed from Zion, that they may fill with joy the whole of Judea.

Behold your God! This expression includes the sum of our happiness, which consists solely in the
presence of God. It brings along with it an abundance of all blessings; and if we are destitute of it, we
must be utterly miserable and wretched; and although blessings of every kind are richly enjoyed by us,
yet if we are estranged from God, everything must tend to our destruction. From this circumstance it
ought also to be remarked, that nothing is more opposite to faith than to estimate by the present
appearances of things what God declares by his prophets, who at that time must have been struck dumb,
had they not raised their views above the world, and thus, through the power of unshaken boldness and
perseverance, dared to draw others along with them, that they might cherish good hopes when matters
were at the worst. And indeed when wicked men and wickedness prevail, the greater the terror that is
spread all around, and the greater the seeming wretchedness of the Church, the more ought we to extol
the grace of God, and to point out his presence to believers. (113)



(113) “A ceux qui la veulent contempler en foy.” “ those who wish to behold it by faith.”

7B. CHARLES SIMEON, “THE MESSIAH’S ADVENT
Isa_40:9. Say unto the cities of Judah, Behold your God. 
 
THE Gospel with all its sublime mysteries is regarded by the generality with coldness and indifference;
whereas the most indistinct prospects of it were sufficient to fill the patriarchs and prophets with holy
rapture. It was a view of its Divine Author which drew forth from the prophet this animated exhortation. He
saw Jesus as it were already incarnate, and called upon the daughters of Zion and Jerusalem to proclaim

and celebrate his advent [Note: It should be read as in the margin, “O daughter, that bringest good tidings
to Zion,” &c. It was customary for women to celebrate the praises of God in public on remarkable
occasions. See Exo_15:20?21, and 1Sa_18:6?7.]. That, which he proposed to them as the subject of their
song, is the one great subject also of our ministrations. To call your attention unto Jesus, to set him forth
as crucified before your eyes, and, with an exalted voice, to cry, Behold your God! this is our commission.
But before we proceed to execute it, we shall,

I. Shew what is implied in this commission—

We cannot fail to observe, what the prophet so strongly intimates,

1. That Christ is God—

[This is a fundamental article of our fuith. The Godhead of Christ is that which stamps a value on his
sufferings, and renders the whole of his undertaking so meritorious and efficient. It would be to little
purpose to say with Pilate, “Behold the man,” if we could not also add with the prophet, “Behold your
God.” But we are not left to doubt of this important truth: it is clearly established in almost every page of
the sacred volume: we need go no further than to the writings of Isaiah; and we shall find it expressly
asserted, that the person who was to be “a Child born, and a Son given to us,” was the mighty god.
[Note: Isa_9:6.] He was therefore to be called Emmanuel, because he was God with us [Note: Isa_7:14.
with Mat_1:23.]. In the very chapter before us, his forerunner, John the Baptist, was commissioned to cry,
Prepare ye the way of the Lord (Jehovah) make straight in the desert an high?way for our God. [Note: ver.
3.] But we need not multiply words on this subject, since the voice of inspiration universally proclaims him
to have been, “God manifest in the flesh,” “God over all, blessed for ever [Note: 1Ti_3:16. Rom_9:5.].”

2. That the knowledge of Christ is of universal importance—

[It was through all “the cities of Judah,” and with her “voice lifted up with strength,” that the daughter of
Zion was to celebrate the Messiah’s advent. And whence the need of such zeal and labour, but on
account of the universal importance of those glad tidings? Indeed there is no other thing which men so
much need to be acquainted with as the work and offices of Christ. No attainments can save them, if they
be ignorant of Christ; nor can any past sins condemn them, if they be truly acquainted with this divine
Saviour. “This,” as our Lord himself tells us, “is life eternal, to know God as the only true God, and Jesus
Christ [Note: Joh_17:3.],” as our Mediator and Advocate with the Father. So excellent is this knowledge,
that St. Paul “counted all things but loss and dung in comparison of it [Note: Php_3:8.].” It is the one mean
of obtaining reconciliation with God, peace of conscience, and deliverance from the power of sin
[Note: 1Jn_1:7.]. O that all were aware how deeply they are interested in receiving these glad tidings! We
should proclaim them with infinitely greater pleasure, if we had not so much reason to complain, that “they
are counted as a strange thing [Note: Hos_8:12.].”]

Taking for granted these fundamental and indisputable truths, we shall,

II. Endeavour to execute the commission—

The text does not limit us to any particular point of view in which we are to behold our God; we shall
therefore direct your attention to him,

1. As descending from heaven—

[Lo! he comes from his bright abodes: but in what form does he appear? Does he descend in solemn
pomp, attended with myriads of the heavenly host? Does he visit the palaces of the great, and assume
our nature in its most dignified appearance? No: He is born of an obscure virgin, and has no better place
for his reception than a stable. Go, look into his mean abode; see him wrapped in swaddling?clothes, and
lying in a manger; look, I say, and behold your God! What marvellous condescension! how does it almost
exceed belief, yet, incredible as it appears, we must again say, Behold your God!]

2. As sojourning on earth—

[Surely, no sooner could his incarnation be known, than all the world, like the eastern Magi, must flock to
worship him [Note: Mat_2:11.]. So one might reasonably hope; but what is that “weeping and lamentation”
that we hear? The young child’s life is sought. The children from two years old and under are massacred
through the whole district, that no possibility may be left for his escape: and He is saved only by the
special interposition of his heavenly Father [Note: Mat_2:16?20.]. See his parents fleeing with him by night
to a distant, a heathen, land, not daring to return to their native country till the death of their blood?thirsty
persecutor! But this was only the beginning of sorrows. View him afterwards when he assumed his proper
office as the Prophet of his church: no sooner did he open his commission, than the short?lived applause
afforded him was turned into the most cruel indignation; and if he had not by an exertion of his own
almighty power effected his escape, his very first sermon had proved his last [Note: Luk_4:28?30.]. But to
pass over to the period of his death. Whom is it that we see prostrate on the ground, and bathed in a
bloody sweat? Who is it that those cruel soldiers are mocking, buffeting, scourging? Who is it that is
nailed to yonder cross, and that we see expiring under such an accumulated weight of shame and
misery? To all this we answer, Behold your god!]

3. As exalted to glory—

[Hitherto we have witnessed nothing but his humiliation; but the shame of his cross was quickly rolled
away. In vain were the stone, the seal, the watch: he burst the bands of death, and rose triumphant.
Henceforth we are to view him ascending amidst myriads of exulting angels, sitting on the throne of his
glory, dispensing blessings to the church below, and receiving the adorations of his church above. Sinner,
lift up thine eyes to heaven, and behold thy once crucified, but now exalted, Redeemer! Now he shines
forth in all his glory, and says to thee, even to thee, “Behold me, behold me [Note: Isa_65:1.]!” O that
every eye might see him, and that all, who have pierced him by their sins, might mourn and be in
bitterness, as one that mourneth for his first?born son [Note: Zec_12:10.]! Soon indeed all shall see him:
the time is shortly coming, when he will descend from heaven again, not however to stand, as before, like
a criminal at man’s tribunal, but to execute judgment on the assembled universe; and then happy shall
they be who have behold him here with suitable affection; they shall behold his face with inexpressible
delight; and be the spectators of his glory, and the partners of his throne, to all eternity.]

Address—

1. The careless—

[Know you what the sins, which you commit so lightly, have occasioned? Go to Calvary and behold your
God; and then judge whether sin be so light and venial a matter as you are ready to imagine! The Jews
and Romans were the immediate actors in that bloody tragedy; but your sins, and the sins of an ungodly
world, were the real occasion of all that your God endured; and, while you continue in your sins, you
“crucify him afresh, and put him to an open shame.” Ah! did David cast away the water, for which the lives
of three men had been endangered, and will not you cast away the sins which have actually shed the

blood of God [Note:2Sa_23:16?17. with Act_20:28.]? Let this thought induce you to put away the polluted
cup from your lips; and and let “the love of Christ constrain you to live unto him who died for you and rose
again.”]

2. The heavy?laden—

[To you especially the Saviour cries, “Look unto me, and be ye saved! “Come unto me, and find rest unto
your souls!” Consider well, who it is that thus invites you; it is your Saviour, and your God; there can be
no want of efficacy in his blood, or of power in his arm: he is a strong rock, a sure foundation, an all?
sufficient help. Trust then in him; and, as a sight of the brazen serpent healed the dying Israelites, so shall
a view of your divine Saviour prove an effectual remedy for all your wants. You shall soon, like Thomas,
exclaim with holy rapture, “My Lord and my God!” or, in the language long since dictated to you by the
spirit of prophecy, “Lo, this is Our God; we have waited for him, and he will save us: this is the Lord; we
have waited for him: we will be glad and rejoice in his salvation [Note: Isa_25:9.]!”]

 
8. MEYER, “
CREATOR AND RULER OF ALL THE EARTH  
 
Isa_40:9-17 
 
Zion is bidden to climb the highest mountain within reach, and announce the advent of the 
Savior-God. When all eyes are turned to behold Him, expecting a mighty hero, lo, a shepherd 
conducts His flock across the waste lands, gathering the weakly lambs to His bosom and gently 
leading the ewes with their young. Do not be afraid of God; He has a shepherd’s heart. Words 
can never tell out all His tenderness; His pitying, understanding love. 
We are next conducted to the Great Sea, Isa_40:12. Remember, says the prophet, that God’s 
hands are so strong that the ocean lies in them as a drop of water in man’s. He can place 
mountains in the scales He holds. So great is He that if all Lebanon’s forests were laid as wood 
on His altar, and all its beasts were consumed as burnt sacrifices, it would not be sufficient to set 
forth Page 68 His praise. And this God is our God forever and ever. The Creator of the ends of 
the earth is our Father. 
 
 
 
9. BI, “
The tidings the Church has to publish 
The text has been variously rendered. 
The best authorities give it, “Thou that bringest good tidings to Zion,” which rendering better 
agrees with the latter part of the verse, with some parallel passages, and with the scope of the 
passage. Our translators took Zion and Jerusalem in the nominative case, and so did others 
before them, as if the prophet called on the chief city to acquaint the other cities of Judah with 
the joyful news of their returning inhabitants: but there is far more congruity in the herald’s 
being instructed to ascend the high mountains that the Jewish captives in the remotest corners 
of Chaldea may hear the joyful proclamation of liberty, and prepare to return to their own 
country. The Jewish Targum (no mean authority) paraphrases the words thus: “O ye prophets 
that bring glad tidings to Zion” Vitringa supports the same idea, as does also Bishop Lowth. The 
language may, with great force, be addressed to the missionaries of every denomination. “O thou 

that hast good tidings to tell, get thee up into the high mountain. Say to the cities of the Eastern 
and the Western world, Behold your God.” 
I. THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH HAS GREAT TIDINGS TO TELL TO T HE WORLD AT LARGE. 
The Jewish prophets were the heralds of a Saviour to come, and beautiful upon the mountains 
were the feet of those who published peace; but the Christian Church has to proclaim the actual 
accomplishment of the great salvation. We have to tell of a Saviour incarnate, crucified, 
enthroned. We have to tell of a justifying righteousness, a sanctifying spirit, a pardoning God: of 
Satan vanquished. The Christian Church has to reveal— 
1. A system of truth as opposed to the errors of heathenism. These truths are universally 
applicable. All have minds to which truth is precious as life to the eye, and the truth as it is in 
Jesus is more needful than life itself. 
2. A system of devotion, as opposed to the absurdities of their superstition. Would you 
choose to have them still ignorant of the attributes of acceptable devotion? 
3. A system of purity, as opposed to the shameless vices of their idolatry. Morality is 
interested in the triumph of missions. 
4. The Christian Church can tell them of the life and immortality brought to light by the 
Gospel, as opposed to their obscure and degrading notions of futurity. 
II. THESE TIDINGS OUGHT NOT TO BE KEPT SECRET, BUT ARE T O BE URGENTLY AND 
UNIVERSALLY PROCLAIMED. “Lift up thy voice with strength: say, Behold your God.” This 
light ought to be held forth as a burning torch, like the beacon light of ancient Pharos, that it 
may scatter the darkness of the night, and guide the tempest-tossed vessel of distant nations to 
the safe anchorage and peaceful haven of the welcome shore. We are bound by every tie, by all 
that can constitute the most solemn and religious obligation, to diffuse far and wide the grand 
principles of salvation. Dwell upon the moral destitution and wretchedness of the nations sitting 
in darkness, and simply ask whether this be a desirable state of things. 
III. THE CERTAINTY THAT THESE TIDINGS SHALL NOT BE PROCLA IMED IN VAIN. God 
has said, “My Word shall not return void.” The Spirit is promised. (S. Thodey.) 
 
 
The Church and her message 
I. THE THOUGHTS THAT CLUSTER AROUND THE NAME. “O Zion,  that bringest glad 
tidings.” That is almost a definition of the Church; at any rate, it is a description of her by her 
most characteristic office and function—that which marks and separates her from all 
associations and societies of men. Her true dignity is that she bears a Gospel in her hand, and 
grace is poured into her lips. We are to suppose the manifestation and approach of the Divine 
Deliverer; hence what constitutes Zion the messenger of good tidings is the presence in her of 
the living God. Translate that into New Testament language, and it just comes to this: that what 
constitutes the Church the evangelist for the world is the simple possession of Christ, or of the 
Gospel, and that breaks out into two or three points. 
1. Whoever has Christ has the power to impart Him. 
2. The possession of Christ for yourselves imposes upon you the obligation to impart Him. 
(1) All property in this world is trust property, and everything that a man knows that can 
help or bless the moral or spiritual age or intellectual condition of his fellows, he is 
thereby under solemn obligation to impart. There is an obligation arising from the bands 
that knit us to one another, so that no man can possess his good alone without being 
untrue to the solidarity of humanity. You have got, you say, the remedy, healing for all 

the diseases of humanity. What would you think of a man who in a pestilence was 
contented with swallowing his own specific, and leaving others to die? You have got the 
Christ, and you have got Him that you may impart Him. 
(2) It is an obligation that arises, too, from the very purposes of your calling. What are 
you saved for? For your own blessedness? Yes, and No. No creature in God’s great 
universe but is great enough to be a worthy end of the Divine action. But no creature in 
God’s universe so great as that he is a worthy end of the Divine action, if he is going to 
keep all the Divine gifts in himself. We are all brought into the light that we may impart 
light. 
3. The very fact of the possession of this Gospel, or of this Christ, for ourselves ought to—
and in all healthy conditions will—inspire the impulse to impart. All deep conviction longs to 
be vocal. 
II. We have here, in a very picturesque and vivid form, the setting forth of THE MANNER IN 
WHICH THE EVANGELIST ZION IS TO PROCLAIM HER MESSAGE . The fair-featured herald 
is bidden to get up into the high mountain, perhaps a mere picturesque detail, perhaps some 
reference to the local position of the city set upon a hill, like the priests of Ebal or Gerizim, or 
Alpine shepherds, calling to each other across the valleys, to secure some vantage ground; and, 
next, to let her voice roll out across the glen. No faltering whisper will do, but a voice that 
compels audience. “Lift up thy voice with strength.” But a timid heart will make a tremulous 
voice, and fear and doubt will whisper when courage will ring it out. So “be not afraid”; there is 
the foundation of the clearness and the loudness with which the word is to be uttered. Our 
message is to be given with a courage and a force that are worthy of it. “Be not afraid.” That is a 
lesson for this day. There are plenty of causes of fear round about us, if, like Peter on the water, 
we look at the waves instead of at the Master. 
1. Let us cherish a firm, soul-absorbing confidence in the power and truth of the message we 
have to tell. 
2. Do not let us make too much of the enemy. 
3. Let us remember the victories of the past. 
4. Above all, let us remember who fights with us. 
III. THE SUBSTANCE AND CONTENTS OF THE EVANGELIST ZION’S  MESSAGE, “Say unto 
the cities of Judah, Behold you God!” They were to be pointed to a great historical act, in which 
God had manifested Himself to men; and the words are not only an exclamation, but an 
entreaty, and the message was to be given to these little daughter cities of Judah as representing 
all of those for whom the deliverance had been wrought;—all which things are paralleled in the 
message that is committed to our hand. We all have given to us the charge of pointing men to 
the great historical fact wherein God is visible to men. You cannot reveal God by word, you 
cannot reveal God by thought. There is no way open to Him to make Himself known to His 
creatures except the way by which men make themselves known to one another, that is, by their 
deeds; and so high above all speculation, high above all abstraction, nearer to us than all 
thought, stands the historical fact in which God shows Himself to the world, and that is in the 
person of Jesus Christ. How beautiful in that connection the verses following my text are: 
“Behold, the Lord God will come with strong hand”; yet “He shall feed His flock like a 
shepherd.” And so in that Christ is the power of God, for He is the arm of the Lord; and in that 
Christ is the gentleness of God; and whilst men grope in the darkness, our business is to point to 
the living, dying Son, and to say, “There you have the ultimate, the perfect representation of the 
unseen God.” (A. Maclaren, D. D.) 
 
 

News proclaimed on mountain-tops  
Some suppose an allusion to the practice of addressing large assemblies from the summit or 
declivity of hills Jdg_9:7; Deu_27:12; Mat_5:1). J.D. Michaelis compares the ancient practice of 
transmitting news by shouting from one hill-top to another, as described by Caesar (Bell. Gall.
7.3) 
. The essential idea is that of local elevation as extending the diffusion of the sound. (J. A.
Alexander.) 
 
 
Behold your God 
The manifestation of God 
Taking the words as they stand in the text, consider them in— 
I. THEIR EXTERNAL ACCOMPLISHMENT in the incarnation, na tivity, personal appearance, 
and ministration of the Son of God in Jerusalem and in the cities of Judah. 
II. THEIR INTERNAL ACCOMPLISHMENT in the hearts of all those who have spiritually 
received the tidings of His Gospel. It is the process of Christ, from His incarnation to His 
ascension, spiritually repeated within us; “God and Saviour” and our salvation entirely depends 
upon our “beholding this”, manifesting Himself in all His amiable attributes within us, and by 
our will cheerfully co-operating with Him in His great work of love. (J. Duche, M. A.) 
 
 
The beholding of Jesus Christ 
The prophet is directing the attention of his countrymen and of the Church in every age to the 
Messiah who is the true God and eternal life. This illustrious personage we may behold in a 
variety of interesting and instructive situations. 
1. Carry your thoughts back into eternity, and behold Him, who in time was made of a 
woman, sitting upon the circle of the heavens, in the essential glory of the Godhead; His 
habitation immensity, His duration eternity, His perfections uncreated and infinite. 
2. As a confirmation of the original glory and Godhead of Jesus Christ, “behold your God” at 
the morning of creation, the dawn of time. Was it not His effective hand that planted the 
pillars of the universe and raised the magnificent fabric of earth and heaven? What He 
formed as the God of creation, He preserves as the God of power. 
3. From the fall of our first parents to the birth of Jesus Christ, the Redeemer is only to be 
seen in promises and prophecies, in sacrifices and ceremonies. Passing over, therefore, this 
long lapse of time, suffer me to conduct your thoughts to Bethlehem. There, “behold your 
God.” 
4. Omitting the occurrences of His childhood and youth, let me invite you to look at Jesus 
entering into the wilderness under the influence and direction of the Holy Ghost. Behold 
Him tempted of the devil forty days and forty nights. It is a Divine maxim that “God cannot 
be tempted, neither tempteth He any man.” But God in human flesh sustained the hour of 
trial. 
5. After this strange event, permitted to the powers of darkness, Jesus appears in a new 
scene of life. Behold, then, your God going forth as a teacher, accompanying His 
ministrations and instructions with signs and wonders, and all the marks of Deity. And He is 
the “same yesterday, to-day, and for ever.” In every age, as well as in the days of His flesh, 

there is treasured up in Him, for the flee use of all that come unto Him, pardon, and peace, 
and grace, and strength, and life, and salvation. 
6. Just before the close of His ministrations, a profitable view of the Lord Jesus opens to us 
in the garden of Gethsemane: there “behold your God!” He appears emphatically a “man of 
sorrows, and acquainted with grief.” But let us follow Him from the garden, through all the 
intermediate scenes of insult, reproach, and ignominy, to the bar of Pontius Pilate: there at 
the tribunal of man “behold your God!” He, who shall one day appear to judge every man 
according to his deeds, now stands arraigned as a criminal before the judgment-seat of man. 
Judgment is perverted: Pilate declares Him innocent, yet suffers Him to be mocked, and 
scourged, and crucified. Mingling in the crowd, follow Him from the common hall, and 
“behold your God” as He passes through, the streets of Jerusalem,. bearing. His cross amidst 
the revilings and tauntmgs of the people, who, m all the virulence of persecution, exclaim, 
“Away with Him, away with Him! crucify Him!” “Behold your God” ascending the summit of 
Calvary. Oh, what a scene was here! a scene which all nature seems backward to behold. 
Standing at the foot of the Cross, learn that “ye were not redeemed with corruptible things,” 
etc. (1Pe_1:18-19). 
7. The last view which we have to take of Jesus Christ closes His sufferings, and 
accomplishes our redemption. “Behold your God” bursting the barriers of the tomb, 
vanquishing the king of terrors, despoiling the sepulchre, breaking the bands of corruption, 
and rising to life, never to die again. Then was fulfilled that prophecy, “O death, I will be thy 
plagues.” To enter into the spirit of the passage, you must keep your mind’s eye upon the 
Saviour, and behold your God as He is ascending to the realms of bliss. Conclusion—“Now is 
the accepted time, now is the day of salvation.” Now it is your privilege by faith to “behold 
your God” as a Saviour, delighting in mercy. (S. Payne.) 
 
 
 
 
10 See, the Sovereign Lord comes with power, 
    and he rules with a mighty arm. 
See, his reward is with him, 
    and his recompense accompanies him. 
 
1.BARNES, “Behold, the Lord God will come - (See the note at 
Isa_40:3) Applied to the 
condition of the Jews in exile, this means that God would come to deliver them. Applied to the 

times of the Messiah, it means that God would manifest himself in a powerful manner as mighty 
to save. 
With strong hand - (קזחב  b
e
ex tÆ t"). Margin, ‘Against the strong.’ So Vitringa and others 
understand it; and regard it as referring to the mighty enemies of the people of God, or, as 
Vitringa particularly supposes, to the great foe of God and his people - the prince of darkness - 
the devil. Lowth also translates it in this manner, ‘Against the strong one.’ The Septuagint 
renders it, Μετά3pσχύος  Meta ischuos - ‘With strength.’ This is the more probable meaning - that 
the Lord would come with the manifestation of strength and power, able to subdue and 
vanquish all the enemies of his people, and to effect their complete and final salvation. 
And his arm - The arm is a symbol of strength, because it is by that that we accomplish our 
purposes; by that a conqueror slays his enemies in battle, etc. Thus, ‘Break thou the arm of the 
wicked;’ that is, diminish or destroy his power Psa_10:15. ‘I have broken the arm of Pharaoh 
king of Egypt’ (Eze_30:21; compare Jer_48:25). Thus it is said of God, ‘Thou hast a mighty arm’ 
Psa_89:13, and, ‘His holy arm hath gotten him the victory’ (Psa_98:1; compare Exo_6:6). The 
metaphor is taken from the act of stretching out the arm to fight in battle, where the arm is the 
effective instrument in subduing an enemy. 
Shall rule for him - Lowth renders the phrase, ול  lo, ‘for him,’ ‘over him:’ - ‘And his arm 
shall prevail over him;’ that is, over the strong and mighty foe. The Septuagint renders it, Μετά3κ
υρίας  Meta kurias - ‘With dominion.’ But the meaning seems to be, ‘God is mighty by himself; his 
power resides in his own arm; he is not dependent on others; he will accomplish the deliverance 
in such a manner that it shall be seen that he did it alone; and he shall rule for himself, without 
any aid, and so that it shall be manifest that he is the sovereign.’ In the deliverance of his people 
from their captivity, he so directed it, that it was manifest that he was their deliverer and 
sovereign; and in the redemption of man, the same thing is apparent, that the arm of God effects 
the deliverance, and that it is his own power that establishes the dominion. 
Behold, his reward is with him - He will be ready to confer the appropriate reward on his 
own people. The idea seems to be taken from the custom of a conqueror, who distributes 
rewards among his followers and soldiers after a signal victory. This was always done in ancient 
wars, apparently because it seemed to be an act of justice that those who had gained the victory 
should share also in the result, and this participation of the booty was a stimulus to future effort, 
as well as a compensation for their valor. The rewards distributed consisted generally of that 
which was taken from the conquered; gold, and silver, and raiment, as well as captives or slaves 
(see Gen_49:7; Exo_15:9; 1Sa_30:26; and particularly Jdg_5:30): 
Have they not sped? 
Have they not divided the prey; 
To every man a damsel or two’; 
To Sisera a prey of divers colors, 
A prey of divers colors of needle-work, 
Of divers colors of needle-work on both sides, 
Meet for the necks of them that take the spoil. 
The idea here is -  
1. That Yahweh would bestow appropriate rewards on his people. 
2. That they would be conferred on his coming, and not be delayed. 
3. That it should be done by the hand of God himself. 

This language was applicable to the interposition of God to save his people from their long 
exile, and the ‘reward’ would be ample in the restoration to their own land, and the re-
establishment of his worship. It is applicable in a higher sense to the coming of the Messiah to 
bless the world. His reward was with him. He blessed his faithful followers on earth; he will 
bless them more abundantly in heaven. It will be assuredly applicable to him when he shall 
come to gather his people to himself in the great and last day, and the language before us is used 
with reference to that: ‘And behold, I come quickly; and my reward is with me, to give every man 
according as his work shall be’ Rev_22:12. 
And his work - Margin, ‘Recompense for his work.’ The margin here is the correct 
rendering. The Hebrew word strictly indeed denotes work, labor, business; but it also denotes 
the wages for work Lev_19:13; Psa_109:20. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
His reward is with him, and his work before him. “His reward is 
with him, and the recompense of his work before him” - That is, the reward and the 
recompense which he bestows, and which he will pay to his faithful servants; this he has ready at 
hand with him, and holds it out before him, to encourage those who trust in him and wait for 
him. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Behold, the Lord God will come with a strong hand,.... Some understand this 
of the second coming of Christ, which coming is certain, such assurances being given of it by 
promise and prophecy; and will be attended with power, which will be requisite to raise the 
dead, summon all nations before him, and pass and execute the proper sentence on them; when 
his arm shall openly bear rule, he will take to himself his great power, and reign; when his 
reward will be with him, to give to every man according to their works; and his own work will be 
before him, to judge the world in righteousness: see 
Rev_22:12, but it is more agreeable to the 
context, which foretells the coming of John the Baptist, points out the ministers of the Gospel, 
and describes Christ in his office, as a shepherd feeding his flock, to understand it of his first 
coming; for not God the Father, but the Son of God, is meant by the Lord God, who is truly God, 
and so able to save, and which was the end of his coming. He is said to come "with a strong 
hand", or with great power, which his work required; which was to fulfil the law, satisfy divine 
justice, atone for sin, grapple and conflict with innumerable enemies, undergo the death of the 
cross, bear the curse of the law, and the wrath of God, and all in order to obtain eternal 
redemption for his people; for this he came from heaven to earth, not by change of place, but by 
assumption of nature. Some render it, "against a strong one" (p); the strong man armed, the 
devil, whose head he came to break, whose works he came to destroy, with whom he fought, and 
whom he conquered and destroyed. Jarchi's note is,  
 
"against the wicked, to take vengeance on them;''  
 
but Aben Ezra and Kimchi supply the word hand, as we do:  
 
and his arm shall rule for him; or he shall have sufficient power of himself to do the work 
he comes about; his own arm or power wrought salvation for him and for his people; see 
Isa_63:5. Some render it, "over him (q)"; that is, over the strong and mighty one, against whom 
he came, whom he conquered, subdued, and ruled over:  
 

behold, his reward is with him; to give to those that trust in him, as Kimchi; or to those that 
do his word, as the Targum; that believe in him, embrace his Gospel, and act according to it: or 
this may respect his own reward, which should follow his work; which he was as sure of as if it 
was in his hands; namely, his exaltation in his human nature, his glory with his Father, and the 
enjoyment of his spiritual seed to all eternity:  
 
and his work before him; the work of redemption and salvation, which he was called unto, 
sent to do, and which, being given him, he agreed to do, was very toilsome and laborious, yet he 
took great delight in it, and has finished it; this is said to be "before him", being proposed in 
council, and cut out in covenant for him, was well known unto him, and in his power to effect, 
and what he could easily do, and did. The Targum understands this of the works of men being 
before him, for whom he has a reward.  
 
 
4. HENRY, “
What that glory is which shall be revealed. “Your God will come, will show 
himself,” 
1. “With the power and greatness of a prince (
Isa_40:10): He will come with strong hand, too 
strong to be obstructed, though it may be opposed. His strong hand shall subdue his people to 
himself, and shall restrain and conquer his and their enemies. He will come who is strong 
enough to break through all the difficulties that lie in his way.” Our Lord Jesus was full of power, 
a mighty Saviour. Some read, it, He will come against the mighty one, and overpower him, 
overcome him. Satan is the strong man armed; but our Lord Jesus is stronger than he, and he 
shall make it to appear that he is so, for, (1.) He shall reign in defiance of all opposition: His arm
shall rule, shall overrule for him, for the fulfilling of his counsels, to his own glory; for he is his 
own end. (2.) He shall recompense to all according to their works, as a righteous Judge: His
reward is with him; he brings along with him, as a returning prince, punishments for the rebels 
and preferments for his loyal subjects. (3.) He shall proceed and accomplish his purpose: His
work is before him, that is, he knows perfectly well what he has to do, which way to go about it, 
and how to compass it. He himself knows what he will do. 
 

 
5. JAMISON, “
with strong hand — or, “against the strong”; rather, “as a strong one” 
[Maurer]. Or, against the strong one, namely, Satan (
Mat_12:29; Rev_20:2, Rev_20:3, 
Rev_20:10) [Vitringa]. 
arm — power (Psa_89:13; Psa_98:1). 
for him — that is, He needs not to seek help for Himself from any external source, but by His 
own inherent power He gains rule for Himself (so Isa_40:14). 
work — or, “recompense for his work”; rather, “recompense which He gives for work” 
(Isa_62:11; Rev_22:12). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
In 
Isa_40:10 the prophet goes back from the standpoint of the fulfilment to that of 
the prophecy. “Behold the Lord, Jehovah, as a mighty one will He come, His arm ruling for
Him; behold, His reward is with Him, and His retribution before Him.” We must not render 
the first clause “with strong,” i.e., with strength, as the lxx and Targum do. The Beth is Beth

essentiae (cf., Isa_26:4; Ges. §154, 3, a). He will come in the essence, strength, and energy of a 
strong one; and this is still further defined by the participial, circumstantial clause, “His arm 
ruling for Him” (brachio suo ipsi dominante). It is His arm that rules for Him, i.e., that either 
brings into subjection to Him, or else overthrows whatever opposes Him. Nevertheless, 
Isa_40:10 does not present Him merely in one aspect, namely as coming to judge and punish, 
but in both aspects, viz., that of the law and that of the gospel, as a righteous rewarder; hence 
the double name of God, Adonai Jehovah (compare Isa_3:15; Isa_28:16; Isa_30:15, all in the 
first part), which is used even in the Pentateuch, and most frequently by Amos and Ezekiel, and 
which forms, as it were, an anagram. ה ָu ֻע ְw is already met with in Lev_19:13 as a synonym of רכ ָשׂ, 
passing from the general idea of work to that of something earned and forfeited. Jehovah brings 
with Him the penal reward of the enemies of His people, and also the gracious reward of the 
faithful of His people, whom He will compensate for their previous sufferings with far exceeding 
joys (see Isa_62:11). 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “10.Behold, the Lord Jehovah. He adorns this short sentence by many words, because
some explanation was needed; and he again uses the word Behold for the sake of certainty, in order to
impart greater confidence to the hearts of good men. Thus he shews more clearly how great advantage
they derive from the presence of God. And first, he says, that he will come with strength, and that strength
not unemployed, but accompanied by such an effect as we shall perceive.

And his arm shall be powerful to him  (114) ול (lo), which we have translated to him, is translated by
others of himself; or, perhaps, it will be thought preferable to translate it, “ is powerful, or
reigns for himself.” The meaning is, that God is sufficient for himself, and does not need the assistance of
any one.

Behold, his reward is with him, and his work before his face. By the repetition of the words “” and “” he
states more clearly what has been already expressed; for it is very customary with Hebrew writers to
express the same thing in two different ways. “” does not here denote what is due to merits, but the
justice of God, by which he testifies that he is a rewarder to all who truly and sincerely call upon him.
(Heb_11:6.) That this is the signification of the word רכש (sachar) is known to all who are moderately
acquainted with the Hebrew language. The meaning may be thus summed up: “ will not come to be
beheld by us as unemployed, but to display his power, and to make us feel it;” and thus, instead of the
word “” the word “” would not be inapplicable. Many persons attempt an ingenious exposition of these
words, and enter into childish discussion about the words “” and “” as if the “” were a merit on which a “” is
bestowed. But nothing was farther from the view of the Prophet; for he repeats the same thing, as we
have already said, and declares the result of the coming of the Lord, from which believers will derive the
highest advantage.



(114) “ strong (hand), or, against the strong.” — Eng. Ver. “ the strong one, that is, against (foreign)
nations to punish them.” —Jarchi. Vitringa gives the same version, though with a different explanation,
and quotes the authorities of Junius and Piscator, while he states that all the ancient interpreters, among
whom he enumerates the Septuagint, Jerome, and the Chaldee Paraphrast, render the phrase with 
strength. — Ed.  

 
8. BI, “
Power and tenderness 
The beauty and peculiarity of these words consist in the combination of the might of Adonai-
Jehovah (
Isa_40:10), with the gentleness of the Shepherd, carrying in His bosom the weak and 
weary of the flock (Isa_40:11). 
 
 
I. “Behold your God,” FULL OF MIGHT AND MAJESTY (Isa_40:10). To Christ all power has 
been committed. He is “the arm of God” (Isa_51:9), “the Man of Jehovah’s right hand,” etc. 
(Psa_80:17). His name is “Immanuel.” 
II. HE COMBINES WITH THE POWER OF THE VICTORIOUS KING, T HE GENTLENESS OF 
THE TENDER AND LOVING SHEPHERD. “He shall feed His flock.” That word is a 
comprehensive one. It means that He shall act all the part of a shepherd towards them; leading 
them, protecting them, providing alike the green pastures and the still waters, Nay, as if this 
were not enough, He is beautifully represented as “gathering the lambs in His arms”;—making a 
pillow for them in the folds of the loose “abbeh,” or shepherd’s mantle, as they nestle close in 
His bosom. And while thus He deals with the tender lambs, He is equally merciful and 
considerate not to overdrive their nursing mothers. Exult in this twofold word of comfort, 
“Behold thy King cometh, meek and lowly.” Behold your God! Behold your Shepherd!, strong to 
smite, strong to save. (J. R. Macduff, D. D.) 
 
 
Characteristics of the great Saviour 
These words exhibit to our view some of the most lively characteristics of that illustrious Saviour 
by whose incarnation our fallen race are become again entitled to that long-lost inheritance 
which had been forfeited by sin, and by whose redeeming process in their souls they are 
rendered capable of enjoying it. The illuminated prophet proceeds to point out the personal 
character of this great Deliverer. 
1. “Behold! the LORD GOD shall come with strong hand, and His arm shall rule for Him.” 
The mistaken Israelites vainly ascribed to these words a temporal interpretation, and looked 
for a deliverer whose conquering arm should effectually rescue them from the earthly 
powers to which they were tributary. But the true children of faithful Abraham wait for the 
spiritual accomplishment of this prophecy in their hearts; and see and feel “the strong hand” 
of their Redeemer in that inward opposition which He raises in their breasts to all the evil 
desires and corrupt passions of human nature. 
2. “Behold! His reward is with Him, and His work before Him.” This work is no other than 
the complete deliverance of man from the captivity of sin and Satan. This reward is no other 
than the glorious acquisition of those lost or wandering souls, who were originally His by 
creation, and are now doubly so by redemption. The prophet seems to dwell upon the power 
and majesty of this Deliverer. He represents Him as coming with a strong hand: and indeed, 
such is usually His first appearance in the sinner’s heart. David speaks of this first 
appearance in the most alarming terms: “The arrows of the Almighty stick fast in me, and 
His hand presseth me sore.” The first feelings of an awakened and convicted conscience are 
agonising indeed; for they are the breaking forth of heaven’s majestic light upon the 
benighted soul, which shakes nature to her very centre, and discloses every hidden recess to 
which conscious guilt flies from its approach. But when viewed with composure, and 
received with cheerfulness, it soon becomes as mild and sweet as the radiance of the risen 

day after a dark and tempestuous night. Hence it is that in the next verse we find the dignity 
and majesty of this august Personage sweetly tempered with condescension and love, and 
melting into heavenly meekness, gentleness, and compassion. 
3. “He shall feed His flock like a shepherd,” etc. 
(1) “The flock” here mentioned can be no other than our whole fallen race, who by virtue 
of that “incorruptible seed” that was inspoken into the first Adam, are put into a capacity 
of regaining eternal life through the redeeming power of Christ, their second Adam. 
(2) But though the Shepherd’s love is thus universal, and all men are the objects of His 
pastoral care; though they are all His children by redemption, yet all do not alike follow 
the “Shepherd s voice”; all are not equally willing to be fed with His “bread of life.” 
(3) Let the humble-minded Christian “lift up his head and look up.” He need not, as the 
Psalmist expresses it, “run here and there for food; and grudge, because he is not 
satisfied”: the wants he feels, reason, he well knows, cannot supply; the comforts he 
aspires after, are such as the world cannot give. Wherever his Shepherd leads, he is 
content to follow: he is sensible of His presence, in darkness as well as in light. The evils 
by which he is oppressed he is satisfied to bear because his Deliverer is ever at his side. 
(J. Duche, M. A.) 
 
 
The magnitude and tenderness of Divine dealings 
We find frequent reference in Scripture to the Divine hand, arm, and bosom, by which God is 
brought the nearer to the level of our comprehension, and within touch of our love and 
confidence. In these verses there is a striking combination in the use made of these figures. 
I. THE MAGNITUDE OF GOD’S POWER AND RULE. “Who hath mea sured the waters in the 
hollow of His hand, and meted out heaven with the span?” etc. The reference to the Divine hand 
is essentially human, man being the only creature on God’s earth who has a hand. How 
wonderful is its construction! It is marvellously adapted for skill, power, and authority. It is that 
which in happy combination with other endowments gives man dominion over creation. It is his 
hand which, in more senses than one, sways the sceptre. It is his hand that asserts his royal 
nature, his power and authority to rule. Again, the arm is that which gives leverage to the hand, 
and without which the hand would be useless. The hand and arm of God are spoken of here. We 
read elsewhere that the heavens are the work of His fingers, that in His hands are the deep 
places of the earth, and that His hands formed the dry land. Here we read, “Who hath measured 
the waters in the hollow of His hand, and meted out heaven with the span? “The great Architect 
and Framer of the universe is represented as forming and adjusting earth, sea, and sky with His 
hand. This is the graphic representation of the Divine Worker at work. The one implement used 
is the hand of the Great Worker—its hollow for the seas, its span for the heavens! What sublime 
poetry descriptive of creative skill! The illustrations are taken from primitive life. The truest 
poetry comes from primitive simplicity. 
1. “Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of His hand?” What is the sublime truth 
which this richly figurative speech conveys? One truth at least is the self-sufficiency of God 
in His creative work. He needed not to go beyond Himself. All creation is the outcome of His 
own power and skill, independent of the shifts of machinery and tools. When this has been 
stated, the prophet proceeds to draw other figures from, primitive life in the simplicity of its 
operations to describe God’s creative work. “Comprehended the dust of the earth in a 
measure” that is a tierce, or the third of an ephah. It is the same word as that used in 
Psa_80:5, “Thou givest them tears to drink in great measure.” As Delitzsch beautifully 
expresses it, it is a small measure for the dust of the earth, but a “great measure” for tears. 

“Weighed the mountains in scales,” that is, a steel-yard, that by which the greater loads are 
weighed; “and the hills in a balance”—the tradesman’s balances which weigh smaller things, 
but with greater accuracy than the “steel-yard.” Nothing has been done by haphazard. Every 
world has been balanced, and the equilibrium of the universe adjusted with infinite wisdom 
and skill. Astronomical observation leads to this conclusion; Isaiah asserted it with regard to 
this earth before astronomy was born. 
2. So far we have dwelt upon Isaiah’s statement of what God had done. Now we notice the 
prophetic announcement of what God would do. The former refers to His creative power, the 
latter to His providential rule. “The Lord God will come with strong hand, and His arm shall 
rule for Him.” There is here a prediction of a special Divine advent in power, but I take this 
as typical of all Divine advents and interventions throughout the ages. We have read of the 
Divine hand in the record of God forming and adjusting the earth, but now we read of the 
Divine arm in His personal advent and providential rule. There is a Providence as well as a 
creation. God has not completed His work by His creative skill and power. “He worketh 
hitherto.” The hand that formed and adjusted is moved by the arm that rules and governs. It 
is the arm that wields the hand. The Scriptures abound with emphatic references to the 
Divine arm. “Hast thou an arm like Job_40:9) asked God out of the whirlwind of Job. “Thou 
hast a mighty arm” (Psa_89:13), exclaimed the Psalmist; and again, “His holy arm hath 
gotten Him the victory” (Psa_98:1). Isaiah wrote, “The Lord hath sworn by the arm of His 
strength” (Isa_62:8), and again, “Therefore His arm brought salvation” (Isa_59:16). In these 
andsimilar passages the arm of God is the symbol of His power in providential and 
redemptive works. “His arm shall rule for Him,”—that is, shall bring all foes submissive, and 
make all subjects obedient to His sovereignty and command. It is instructive to notice the 
different names applied to God in the Scriptures to show various aspects of His character 
and work. Observe the names by which God is called here. “The Lord God” (Adonai-
Jehovah)—a combination of the two greatest names by which God was knownunder the Old 
Dispensation. The consequent announcement is that of the advent of the “Mighty One” 
(R.V.). Yet these words, expressive of power and dominion, are followed by others which 
have all the tenderness and grace of a pastoral symphony. 
II. THE TENDERNESS OF HIS SHEPHERDLY CARE. “He shall fee d His flock like a shepherd,” 
etc. The hand that meted out the heavens and measured the waters of the deep is that which 
feeds the flock, and the arm that rules for Him is the arm that gathers the lambs. “And carry 
them in His bosom.” Ah! I have not read of “His bosom” in this context before now. I heard no 
mention of His bosom when He was spoken of as measuring the waters in the hollow of His 
hand, and meting out heaven with the span; it is only when the prophet speaks of the lambs that 
he mentions not only God’s arm but also His bosom. The hollow of His hand is good enough for 
the waters, His span for the heavens, His arm for His subjects, but only His bosom for the 
lambs. This is a tenderness specially adapted to the peculiar need. “And shall gently lead those 
that are with young,” or. “those that give suck” (R.V.). The great Shepherd will not forget 
motherhood with its cares and burdens. God s omnipotence can only be equalled by His 
compassion. He is not only Almighty, but also “Almighty to save.” Our God who created the 
heavens has also lifted up the Cross. (D. Davies.) 
 
 
The grandeur and pathos of theology 
In those words, “His arm shall rule for Him,” we have the grandeur of theology; but in these 
words, “He shall feed His flock like a Shepherd,” we have the pathos of theology. (D. Davies.) 
 
 

Consolation from the thought of God’s omnipotence  
In his autobiography, Goethe tells us that the earthquake in Lisbon fairly stumbled his faith and 
awakened his alarm at the time when he first heard the news of it. The notion of Divine 
reliability fell under his suspicion; how could anyone trust a God who would suffer that 70,000 
people should be overwhelmed by one awful tide of the ocean, rushing up and back as the earth 
rose in imperious strength of upheaval; where was His goodness? What might He not do next? 
The young man was frightened at the manifestation of so much almightiness. Later on in life he 
saw how fine it was to have for his God a being who could rock the world at His will. (C.
S.Robinson, D. D.) 
 
 
11 He tends his flock like a shepherd: 
    He gathers the lambs in his arms 
and carries them close to his heart; 
    he gently leads those that have young. 
 
1.BARNES, “He shall feed his flock - In the previous verse, the fact had been asserted 
that God would come to subdue his foes, and to reward his people. In this verse, the mild and 
gentle character of his government over his people is predicted. It would not be that of a 
conqueror over vanquished subjects; but it would be mild and tender, like that of a shepherd 
who carries the lambs, which are unable to walk, in his own arms, and gently leads along the 
feeble and the delicate. The verb translated “to feed’ (
הערי  yir
e
‛eh), denotes more than our word 
feed at present. It refers to all the care of a shepherd over his flock; and means to tend, to guard, 
to govern, to provide pasture, to defend from danger, as a shepherd does his flock. It is often 
applied in the Scriptures to God represented as the tender shepherd, and especially to the 
Redeemer Psa_23:1; Eze_34:23; Joh_10:14; Heb_13:20; 1Pe_2:25; 1Pe_5:4. It is often applied 
to a leader or a ruler of a people 2Sa_5:2; 2Sa_7:7; Jer_32:2. Thus Homer often uses the phrase, 
ποι8ήν3λαyν  poimen laon - ‘shepherds of the people,’ to denote a ruler, or monarch. Here it 
denotes that God would evince toward his people the same tender care, guardianship and 
protection, which a shepherd shows for his flock. 
He shall gather the lambs with his arm - This is a most beautiful expression, denoting 
the care of God the Saviour for the feeblest and weakest of his people, and for the young and 
feeble in years and piety. A similar thing is often done by a shepherd. The tender lamb, unable to 
keep up with the flock, becomes weary and exhausted; and the shepherd naturally takes it in his 
arms and carries it. Such a shepherd as this Virgil beautifully describes: 
En, ipse capellas

Protenus aeger argo; hancetiam vix, Tityre, duco;
Hic inter densas corylos modo namque gemellos,
Spem gregis, Ah! silice in nuda connixa reliquet. 
Eclog. i. 12.
Lo! I my goats urge fainting o’er the mead; 
This, feebler than the rest, with pains I lead. 
Yean’d mid yon herds upon the flinty plain, 
Her dying twins, my flock’s late hope, remain. 
Wrangham.
And shall gently lead ... - Margin, ‘Give suck.’ This is the more correct translation. It 
denotes the dams of the flock that would be easily exhausted by being overdriven, and of which 
there was, therefore, special care necessary. Thus Jacob says to his brother Esau, Gen_33:13 : 
‘The flocks and the herds giving suck to their young are with me, and if they should be 
overdriven all the flock will die.’ Of the necessity of such care and attention there is abundant 
evidence, and indeed it is manifest at a glance. Dr. Shaw, speaking of the exposure of the flocks 
in Syria, says: ‘The greatest skill and vigilance, and even tender care, are required in the 
management of such immense flocks as wander on the Syrian plains. Their prodigious numbers 
compel the keepers to remove them too frequently in search of fresh pastures, which proves very 
destructive to the young that have not strength to follow.’ The following extract from Anderson’s 
Tour through Greece will also serve to illustrate this passage: ‘One of the great delights in 
traveling through a pastoral country, is to see and feel the force of the beautiful imagery in the 
Scriptures, borrowed from pastoral life. 
All day long the shepherd attends his flock, leading them into “green pastures,” near fountains 
of water, and chooses a convenient place for them to “rest at noon.” At night he drives them near 
his tent; and, if there is danger, encloses them in the fold. They know his voice, and follow him. 
When traveling, he tenderly watches over them, and carries such as are exhausted in his arms. 
Such a shepherd is the Lord Jesus Christ.’ No description could more beautifully describe the 
character of the Redeemer. In the New Testament, he is often described as a kind and tender 
shepherd, and regarding the welfare of all his flock, and as ready to give his life for them 
Joh_10:7, Joh_10:9-11, Joh_10:14-15; Heb_13:20; 1Pe_2:25; 1Pe_5:4. We are here also 
strikingly reminded of the solemn command which he gave to Peter, evincing his tender regard 
for his flock, ‘Feed my lambs:’ ‘Feed my sheep’ Joh_16:15-17. It proves in regard to the 
Redeemer: 
1. That his nature is mild, and gentle, and tender. 
2. That he has a kind regard for all his flock, and will consult the real interest of all, as a 
shepherd does of his flock. 
3. That he has a special solicitude for the feeble and infirm, and that they will be the objects of 
his tender care. 
4. That he feels a particular solicitude for the young. He knows their feebleness; he is 
acquainted with their temptations; he sees the importance of their being trained up with 
care; and he looks with deep interest, therefore, on all the efforts made to guard them 
from the ways of sin, and to train them up for his service (compare the note at Isa_42:3). 
 
 
 
 

2. CLARKE, “Shall gently lead those that are with young “The nursing ewes shall 
he gently lead” - A beautiful image, expressing, with the utmost propriety as well as elegance, 
the tender attention of the shepherd to his flock. That the greatest care in driving the cattle in 
regard to the dams and their young was necessary, appears clearly from Jacob’s apology to his 
brother Esau, Gen_33:13 : “The flocks and the herds giving suck to their young are with me; and 
if they should be overdriven, all the flock will die.” Which is set in a still stronger light by the 
following remark of Sir John Chardin: “Their flocks,” says he, speaking of those who now live in 
the east after the patriarchal manner, “feed down the places of their encampments so quick, by 
the great numbers that they have, that they are obliged to remove them too often, which is very 
destructive to their flocks, on account of the young ones, who have not strength enough to 
follow.” Harmer’s Observ. i., p. 126. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
He shall feed his flock like a shepherd,.... Christ has a flock, a flock of men, a 
distinct and peculiar people, and it is but one, and that a little one, and yet a beautiful one, 
though often a flock of slaughter; which is his by his Father's gift, and his own purchase, and 
appears manifest in the effectual calling, when he calls them by name; to these he stands in the 
relation of a shepherd, being so by his Father's designation and appointment, and his own 
consent; and a good shepherd he is, as is manifest by his laying down his life for the sheep; and a 
great one, being Jehovah's fellow, and the chief shepherd, under whom all others are; yea, he is 
the one, and only one; and a very careful, compassionate, and faithful one he is; who performs 
his whole office as a shepherd, not only by providing food for his flock, by leading them into 
green and good pastures, his church and ordinances; by appointing under shepherds to feed 
them with the doctrines of the Gospel, the wholesome words of the Lord Jesus; and by feeding 
them himself, with himself, the bread of life, and hidden manna, whose flesh is meat indeed, and 
whose blood is drink indeed; but also by protecting them from all their enemies, the roaring and 
devouring lion, Satan, and wolves in sheep's clothing, false teachers; and by taking such notice 
and account of them, as that none of them shall be lost; and by doing all that is expressed 
Eze_34:16, seeking that which was lost; bringing back that which was driven away; binding up 
that which was broken; and strengthening and healing the sick, as well as watching over them 
night and day, lest any hurt them:  
 
he shall gather the lambs with his arm; the weaklings of the flock; the same with babes 
and sucklings, newly born souls, weak believers, mean and low in their own eyes, the smoking 
flax, and bruised reed, the day of small things, the poor of the flock; these he gathers with his 
arm of power, and by the ministry of the Gospel, both to himself, his person, righteousness, 
grace and fulness, and to his church, to partake of the word and ordinances of it, and to nearer 
communion with him in them; he gathers them up into his arms in a way of protection, when 
liable to fall into the hands of powerful enemies, and to be hurt by them, and in order to carry 
them, they not being able to go of themselves, as it follows:  
 
and carry them in his bosom; which is expressive of very great affection to them, such being 
greatly loved as are put into the bosom, as Obed by Naomi, the poor man's ewe lamb, and a wife 
of youth; as also of great nearness to him, being in his bosom must lie near his heart, and are 
indeed upon it; likewise it denotes the most intimate communion with him, and a being privy to 
his secrets, as Christ in the bosom of his Father is to his; as well as it implies an enjoyment of 
rest in him, and safety by him; for what can disturb or hurt such as are in the bosom of Christ?  
 
and shall gently lead those that are with young; who have the seed of grace in them, have 
spiritual principles wrought in their souls, Christ formed in their hearts, are full of desires for 

him and spiritual things, and carry a burden, that of their sins, under which they groan; these he 
leads out, and off of themselves to himself, his blood, righteousness, and sacrifice, into green 
pastures, into his Father's presence, and at last to glory; and he leads them on "gently", 
gradually, step by step, to see their own vileness and sinfulness, to look, go to, lay hold on him, 
and retain him; he leads them into the truths of the Gospel, and the deep waters of the 
sanctuary, and proportionably to their strength as they are able to bear, either the doctrines of 
the Gospel, or the duties of religion, or afflictions and sufferings; see Gen_33:14. 
 
4. HENRY, “
“With the pity and tenderness of a shepherd,” 
Isa_40:11. God is the Shepherd of
Israel (Psa_80:1); Christ is the good Shepherd, Joh_10:11. The same that rules with the strong 
hand of a prince leads and feeds with the kind hand of a shepherd. (1.) He takes care of all his 
flock, the little flock: He shall feed his flock like a shepherd. His word is food for his flock to feed 
on; his ordinances are fields for them to feed in; his ministers are under-shepherds that are 
appointed to attend them. (2.) He takes particular care of those that most need his care, the 
lambs that are weak, and cannot help themselves, and are unaccustomed to hardship, and those
that are with young, that are therefore heavy, and, if any harm be done them, are in danger of 
casting their young. He particularly takes care for a succession, that it may not fail or be cut off. 
The good Shepherd has tender care for children that are towardly and hopeful, for young 
converts, that are setting out in the way to heaven, for weak believers, and those that are of a 
sorrowful spirit. These are the lambs of his flock, that shall be sure to want nothing that their 
case requires. [1.] He will gather them in the arms of his power; his strength shall be made 
perfect in their weakness, 2Co_12:9. He will gather them in when they wander, gather them up 
when they fall, gather them together when they are dispersed, and gather them home to himself 
at last; and all this with his own arm, out of which none shall be able to pluck them, Joh_10:28. 
[2.] He will carry them in the bosom of his love and cherish them there. When they tire or are 
weary, are sick and faint, when they meet with foul ways, he will carry them on, and take care 
they are not left behind. [3.] He will gently lead them. By his word he requires no more service, 
and by his providence he inflicts no more trouble, than he will fit them for; for he considers their 
frame.
 
5. JAMISON, “
feed — including all a shepherd’s care - “tend” (
Eze_34:23; Psa_23:1; 
Heb_13:20; 1Pe_2:25). 
carry — applicable to Messiah’s restoration of Israel, as sheep scattered in all lands, and 
unable to move of themselves to their own land (Psa_80:1; Jer_23:3). As Israel was “carried 
from the womb” (that is, in its earliest days) (Isa_63:9, Isa_63:11, Isa_63:12; Psa_77:20), so it 
shall be in “old age” (that is, its latter days) (Isa_46:3, Isa_46:4). 
gently lead — as a thoughtful shepherd does the ewes “giving suck” (Margin) (Gen_33:13, 
Gen_33:14). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
The prophet dwells upon this, the redeeming side not the judicial, as he proceeds to 
place the image of the good shepherd by the side of that of the Lord Jehovah. “He will feed His
flock like a shepherd, take the lambs in His arm, and carry them in His bosom, and gently lead
those that are giving suck.” The flock is His people, now dispersed in a foreign land. The love 

with which He tends this flock is shown, by way of example, in His conduct towards the םִיcל ְט (= 
םִיי ָל ְט from י ִל ְט = ה ֶל ָט), the young lambs that have not long been born, and the תוֹל ָע, those giving 
suck, lactantes (Vulg. fetae), not those that are sucking, sugentes (from לוּע med. Vav, to 
nourish). Such as cannot keep pace with the flock he takes in his arms, and carries in the bosom 
of his dress; and the mothers he does not overdrive, but ל ֵהַנְי (see at Psa_23:2), lets them go 
gently alone, because they require care (Gen_33:13). With this loving picture the prologue in 
Isa_40:1-11 is brought to a close. It stands at the head of the whole, like a divine inauguration of 
the prophet, and like the quintessence of what he is commanded to proclaim. Nevertheless it is 
also an integral part of the first address. For the questions which follow cannot possibly be the 
commencement of the prophecy, though it is not very clear how far they form a continuation.  
The connection is the following: The prophet shows both didactically and paraenetically what 
kind of God it is whose appearance to redeem His people has been prophetically announced in 
Isa_40:1-11. He is the incomparably exalted One. This incomparable exaltation makes the 
ignorance of the worshipers of idols the more apparent, but it serves to comfort Israel. And 
Israel needs such consolation in its present banishment, in which it is so hard for it to 
comprehend the ways of God. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “11.As a shepherd. In this verse he declares what is the nature of that work of the Lord; for
since he works in various and, indeed, in innumerable ways, the hearer might have been kept in
suspense as to the work which God intended to accomplish; and thus the general doctrine would have
been less efficacious in exciting hope. Though he does not describe every part, yet he states in a few
words that God has determined to protect and guard his Church. On this account he compares him to “
shepherd;” and under this designation he expresses his infinite love towards us, when he does not refuse
to stoop so low as to perform towards us the office of “shepherd.” In other passages, and even a little
before, (Isa_34:2, etc.,) he described himself as armed with terrible power for the defense of his people,
and a little after this he repeats the same statement; but here he ascribes to him a more amiable
character, that believers may sweetly repose under his protection.

He will feed his flock. Now, although by the word “” he describes an elect people, whom he had
undertaken to govern, yet we are reminded that God will be a shepherd to none but to those who, in
modesty and gentleness, shall imitate the sheep and lambs. For this reason we ought to observe the
character of the flock; for he does not choose to feed savage beasts, but lambs. We must therefore lay
aside our fierceness, and permit ourselves to be tamed, if we wish to be gathered into the fold of which
God promises that he will be the guardian.

He will carry them in his bosom. These words describe God’ wonderful condescension; for not only is he
actuated by a general feeling of regard to his whole flock, but, in proportion to the weakness of any one
sheep, he shews his carefulness in watching, his gentleness in handling, and his patience in leading it.
Here he leaves out nothing that belongs to the office of a good shepherd; for the shepherd ought to
observe every sheep, so as to treat it according to its capacity; and especially they ought to be supported,
if they are exceedingly weak. In a word, God will be mild, kind, gentle, and compassionate, so that he will
not drive the weak harder than they are able to bear.

8. CHARLES SIMEON, “CHRIST’S CARE FOR HIS SHEEP
Isa_40:11. He shall feed his flock like a shepherd: he shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them 
in his bosom; and shall gently lead those that are with young. 
 
THE holy Psalmist, speaking of Jehovah’s care of him, says, “The Lord is my Shepherd:” and then, from
the union of the Godhead with the pastoral office, he infers, “Therefore I shall not want [Note: Psa_23:1.].”
The same incomprehensible union is mentioned by the prophet in the passage before us. The heralds
that proclaimed the advent of the Messiah were commanded to draw the attention of men to them in
these words, “Behold your God!” The person thus announced, is further described in the words preceding
our text; “Behold! the Lord God will come:” and then it is added, “he shall feed his flock like a shepherd.”
Now when it is considered how prone the Israelites were to idolatry, it cannot be conceived that the
prophet should speak of the Messiah in such exalted terms, if they did not properly belong to him. But the
prophets generally, and Isaiah in particular, are very full and explicit in declaring, that Jehovah was to
become incarnate, and by the sacrifice of himself to redeem and save a ruined world. It is not however of
his person that we now propose to speak, but of his office; that being the particular point to which my text
refers: yet it would be improper to pass over such a strong testimony to the divinity of our blessed Lord,
because, in the judgment of all, but more especially of Jews, it must have the effect of silencing every
doubt upon that important subject. And it adds no little interest to the description here given of him, when
we know, that He who so condescends to minister as a Shepherd to the least and meanest of his flock, is
the Most High God: according as it is written, “To us a child is born, to us a Son is given; and his name
shall be called, The Mighty God [Note: Isa_9:6.].”

The words which form the ground?work of our discourse, will lead me to set before you,

I. A general view of our Lord as a Shepherd—

The character of a shepherd is frequently assigned to our blessed Lord, in the Scriptures both of the Old
and New Testament [Note: Eze_37:24. Zec_13:7. Heb_13:20. 1Pe_5:4.]: and every duty pertaining to
that office is executed by him:—

1. He gathers them to his fold—

[They are “wandering upon the dark mountains, in a cloudy and dark day [Note: Eze_34:6.];” “every one
going in his own way [Note: Isa_53:6.],” and “after the imaginations of his own heart [Note: Jer_23:17.]” —
— — The paths of all, though differing from each other according as the age, the inclinations, and the
diversified temptations of the different individuals may lead them — — — all agree in this, that they are
far distant from the ways of God’s commandments [Note: Rom_3:11?12.]. But “he searches for them, and
seeks them out:” he follows them by the preaching of his word, by the dispensations of his providence, by
the mighty working of his Spirit; and, having found them, “he apprehends them” by his pastoral crook
[Note: Php_3:12.], and “makes them willing” to return with him [Note: Psa_110:3.], and “carries them
home upon his shoulders rejoicing [Note: Luk_15:5?6.]”— — —]

2. He provides for their wants—

[O! how sweet are the pastures into which he leads them [Note: Eze_34:14.]! Who can express the
delight which a converted soul experiences in feeding upon the promises, “the exceeding great and
precious promises” of his God? — — — In comparison of the food provided for the sheep of Christ, all

else is but as “husks on which the swine subsist [Note: Luk_15:16. Isa_55:2.].” This is set forth in
Scripture under the image of a luxurious feast [Note: Isa_24:6.]: and verily it is “a feast of fat things” to all
the saints; a feast, of which even the angels themselves might account it a privilege to partake
[Note: Psa_78:25.] — — —]

3. He affords them his effectual protection—

[Weak as they are, and beset with many enemies, they are preserved in perfect safety [Note: 1Pe_1:5.]
— — — He who laid down his life for them, will suffer “none to pluck them out of his hand
[Note: Joh_10:11; Joh_10:28.]” — — — “They lie down beside the still waters [Note: Psa_23:2.],” which
are a just emblem of the tranquillity of their own souls — — — “They are kept in perfect peace, because
they trust in him [Note: Isa_26:3.].”]

4. He administers to them according to their diversified necessities—

[Amongst them there will be some who are sick, or diseased, or injured by some misfortune: but he knows
all their particular cases, and imparts to them the relief which they severally need; “bringing buck those
which have been driven away, binding up that which has been broken, and strengthening that which is
sick [Note:Eze_34:16.]”— — — and never intermitting his care of them, till he has brought them to his fold
above [Note: Psa_23:5?6.]— — —]

But our text requires us to take,

II. A more particular view of him as ministering to the weak and needy—

Let us notice then in a more especial manner,

1. His tenderness to the weak—

[The lambs which have been but recently brought forth, may be supposed incapable of proceeding with
the flock to any distant pasture. But these “he will gather with his arms, and carry in his bosom.” “He will
not despise the day of small things [Note: Zec_4:10.].” There is not one in all his flock so weak, but he will
pay the most minute attention to its necessities. He who gave so particular a charge to Peter to “feed
his lambs,” and required this of him as a necessary proof of his love [Note: Joh_21:15.], will not himself
neglect his lambs; but rather will augment his tender assiduities in proportion as the weakness of the
lamb calls for more peculiar care: he will even take it up, and “carry it in his bosom.” In what an endearing
view does this place the character of our blessed Lord! — — — How sweetly encouraging is this
consideration to those who feel their weakness, and are ready to despond because of it! — — — Let us
remember, that when his disciples would have kept persons from troubling him with their little children, he
reproved them, and said, “Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the
kingdom of heaven [Note: Mar_10:14.].” Whether therefore you be children in respect of your natural or
spiritual birth, fail not to come to him, assured, that he will bear with your infirmities, and “perfect his own
strength in your weakness [Note: 2Co_12:9.]” — — —]

2. His compassion to the afflicted—

[He will have respect to the state of his flock, even as Jacob had, who “would not overdrive them one day,
lest they should all die [Note: Gen_33:13?14.].” So our blessed Lord “will gently lead that which is with
young.” There are amongst his people many who are weary and heavy?laden with a sense of sin, and

bowed down greatly by reason of the difficulties of their way. But to the former he sends a special
invitation, with an assured promise of rest [Note: Mat_11:28.]: and to the latter he authorizes us to
declare, that “he will raise them up [Note: Psa_146:8.].” In truth, he is pre?eminently distinguished by this,
that “he will not break the bruised reed, nor quench the smoking flax; but will bring forth judgment unto
victory [Note: Mat_12:20.]. Consider what is implied in these metaphors: a bruised reed is, according to
human appearance, incapable of ever sending forth a melodious sound; and smoking flax has, as it were,
but a hidden spark of fire, whilst it is sending forth whole clouds of corruption: yet will Christ fan the
expiring spark to a flame, and attune the reed to send forth the most heavenly strains. Let none then
despond, however destitute they may be of any thing to encourage them from within; but let them “be
strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might [Note: Eph_6:10.]” — — —]

Let me now add a few words,

1. In commendation of this good Shepherd—

[Whence is it that all do not put themselves under his care? Is there any want of love, or tenderness, or
power in him? God frequently, by his prophets, called on his rebellious people to testify against him, and
to say, whether there had been any want of kindness or care in him: “O my people, what have I done unto
thee? and wherein have I wearied thee? Testify against me [Note: Mic_6:3. Jer_2:5; Jer_2:31.].” “What
could I have done more for my people than I have done [Note: Isa_5:4.]?” So do I now, in the name of this
good Shepherd, call upon you all this day, to bear, if you can, your testimony against him. Whom did he
ever neglect or despise? Whom that sought him did he ever refuse to receive? Whom that trusted in him,
did he ever omit to supply according to his necessities? — — — If then no complaint ever was, or could
be made against him from the world, let every heart appreciate his excellency, and every soul commit
itself to its care — — — [Note: If this were a subject for an Ordination or Visitation Sermon, the Clergy
should be urged to follow the example of this good Shepherd.]]

2. For the augmentation and encouragement of his flock—

[You who have to this hour been going astray, and walking in the way of your own hearts, reflect upon
your guilt and danger, and “return now without delay to the Shepherd and Bishop of your souls
[Note: 1Pe_2:25.]” — — — As employed by him, I come now to search you out, and to bring you home to
his fold [Note:Eph_4:11. Mar_16:15. Jer_23:4.] — — — O think, how delightful it will be to “hear his voice
calling every one of you by name [Note: Joh_10:3.],” and “going in and out with you” as long as you shall
remain in this dreary wilderness [Note: Joh_10:9.], and then performing the same office for you in the
realms of bliss [Note:Rev_7:17.]; “O listen not to the voice of strangers” — — — but, follow him — — —
that you may be one fold under one Shepherd for ever and ever [Note: Joh_10:5; Joh_10:9; Joh_10:16.].]
 
 
 
12 Who has measured the waters in the hollow of his 
hand, 

    or with the breadth of his hand marked off the 
heavens? 
Who has held the dust of the earth in a basket, 
    or weighed the mountains on the scales 
    and the hills in a balance? 
 
1.BARNES, “Who hath measured - The object in this and the following verses to 
Isa_40:26, 
is to show the greatness, power, and majesty of God, by strong contrast with his creatures, and 
more especially with idols. Perhaps the prophet designed to meet and answer an implied 
objection: that the work of deliverance was so great that it could not be accomplished. The 
answer was, that God had made all things; that he was infinitely great; that he had entire control 
over all the nations; and that he could, therefore, remove all obstacles out of the way, and 
accomplish his great and gracious purposes. By man it could not be done; nor had idol-gods any 
power to do it; but the Creator and upholder of all could effect this purpose with infinite case. At 
the same time that the argument here is one that is entirely conclusive, the passage, regarded as 
a description of the power and majesty of God, is one of vast sublimity and grandeur; nor is 
there any portion of the Sacred Volume that is more suited to impress the mind with a sense of 
the majesty and glory of Yahweh. The question, ‘who hath measured,’ is designed to imply that 
the thing referred to here was that which had never been done, and could never be done by man; 
and the argument is, that although that which the prophet predicted was a work which 
surpassed human power, yet it could be done by that God who had measured the waters in the 
hollow of his hand. The word ‘waters’ here refers evidently to the vast collection of waters in the 
deep - the mighty ocean, together with all the waters in the running streams, and in the clouds. 
See Gen_1:6, where the firmament is said to have been made to divide the waters from the 
waters. A reference to the waters above the heavens occurs in Psa_148:4 : 
Praise him, ye heavens of heavens, 
And ye waters that be above the heavens. 
And in Pro_30:4, a Similar description of the power and majesty of God occurs: 
Who hath gathered the wind in his fists? 
Who hath bound the waters in a garment? 
Who hath established all the ends of the earth? 
And in Job_26:8 : 
He bindeth up the waters in his thick clouds; 
And the cloud is not rent under them. 
The word ‘waters’ here, therefore, may include all the water on the earth, and in the sky. The 
words, ‘the hollow of his hand,’ mean properly the hand as it is closed, forming a hollow or a 

cavity by which water can be taken up. The idea is, that God can take up the vast oceans, and all 
the waters in the lakes, streams, and clouds, in the palm of his hand, as we take up the smallest 
quantity in ours. 
And meted out heaven - The word rendered ‘meted,’ that is, measured (ןוכ  Kuts), means 
properly to stand erect, to set up, or make erect; to found, fit, adjust, dispose, form, create. It 
usually has the idea of fitting or disposing. The word ‘span’ (תרז  zeret) denotes the space from 
the end of the thumb to the end of the middle finger, when extended - usually about nine inches. 
The idea is, that Yahweh was able to compass or grasp the heavens, though so vast, as one can 
compass or measure a small object with the span. What an illustration of the vastness and 
illimitable nature of God! 
And comprehended - And measured (לכ  Kkt. from לוּכ  Kut., to hold or contain); ‘Lo, the 
heavens, and the heaven of heavens cannot contain thee’ 1Ki_8:27. 
The dust of the earth - All the earth; all the dust that composes the globe. 
In a measure - (שׁלשׁב  v tHx t.ı;sh) Properly three; and then the third part of anything. Jerome 
supposes that it means the three fngers, and that the sense is, that God takes up all the dust of 
the earth in the first three fingers of the hand. But the more probable signification is, that the 
word denotes that which was the third part of some other measure, as of an ephah, or bath. In 
Psa_80:5, the word is used to denote a large measure: 
Thou feedest them with the bread of tears, 
And givest them tears to drink in great measure (  שׁילשׁ  Hx t.ı;ysh). 
The idea is, that God is so great that he can measure all the dust of the earth as easily as we 
can measure a small quantity of grain with a measure. 
And weighed the mountains in scales - The idea here is substantially the same. It is, that 
God is so mighty that he can weigh the lofty mountains, as we weigh a light object in scales, or in 
a balance; and perhaps, also, that he has disposed them on the earth as if he had weighed them 
out, and adapted them to their proper places and situations Throughout this entire passage, 
there is not only the idea of majesty and power in God, but there is also the idea that he has 
suited or adjusted everything by his wisdom and power, and adapted it to the condition and 
needs of his creatures. 
                                                                                                                                                                   
2. GILL, “
Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand?.... The following 
account of the power, wisdom, and all sufficiency of God, and which is to be understood of 
Christ, is to show that he is equal to the work of redemption and salvation he has engaged in, 
and was about to come and perform, and that he is able to do it, as well as to execute his office as 
a shepherd; and also to observe, that though his rich grace and goodness he had condescended 
to take upon him the work of a saviour, and the office of a shepherd, yet this was not to be 
interpreted as if he had lost his dignity and glory as a divine Person, or as if that was in the least 
diminished; for he was no other than that infinite Being, "who has measured the waters in the 
hollow of his hand"; the waters of the seas, for which he has provided a receptacle, where he has 
collected and put them together; the dimensions of which are exactly known to him, and the vast 
confluence of water is no more in his hands than so much water as a man can hold in the hollow 
of his hand, in his fist, or hand contracted: 
 
 

and meted out heaven with the span; which he has stretched out as a curtain, Isa_40:22, 
and the measure of which is but one hand's breadth with him; and is no more to him than 
stretching out a carpet or canopy; and as easily measured by him as a piece of cloth is by a man 
with the span of his hand, or any measuring rule or yard:  
 
and comprehended the dust of the earth in a measure; the word (r) used signifies the 
third part of some larger measure, as of a sextarius, as some; or of an ephah, or bath as others; 
or of some other measure not known; See Gill on Psa_80:5. The Vulgate Latin version renders 
it, "with three fingers"; and the sense may be, that the dust of the earth, or the earth itself, which 
is but dust, is no more with the Lord than so much earth or dust as a man can hold between his 
thumb and two fingers; and in like manner is the whole earth comprehended by the Lord:  
 
and weighed the mountains in scales, and the hills in a balance; as easily as a man can 
throw in his goods into a pair of scales, and take the true weight of them, with equal ease did the 
Lord raise the mountains and the hills in a proper proportion, and has so exactly poised them, as 
if he had weighed them in a pair of scales; this seems to hint at the use of mountains and hills to 
be a sort of ballast to the earth, and shows the original formation of them from the beginning. 
The answer to the above question is, that it was the same divine Person of whom it is said, 
"behold your God, and who should come with a strong hand, and feed his flock."  
 
 
4. HENRY, “
The scope of these verses is to show what a great and glorious being the Lord 
Jehovah is, who is Israel's God and Saviour. It comes in here, 1. To encourage his people that 
were captives in Babylon to hope in him, and to depend upon him for deliverance, though they 
were ever so weak and their oppressors ever so strong. 2. To engage them to cleave to him, and 
not to turn aside after other gods; for there are none to be compared with him. 3. To possess all 
those who receive the glad tidings of redemption by Christ with a holy awe and reverence of 
God. Though it was said (
Isa_40:9), Behold your God, and (Isa_40:11) He shall feed his flock
like a shepherd, yet these condescensions of his grace must not be thought of with any 
diminution to the transcendencies of his glory. Let us see how great our God is, and fear before 
him; for, 
I. His power is unlimited, and what no creature can compare with, much less contend with, 
Isa_40:12. 1. He has a vast reach. View the celestial globe, and you are astonished at the extent 
of it; but the great God metes the heavens with a span; to him they are but a hand-breadth, so 
large-handed is he. View the terraqueous globe, and he has the command of that too. All the 
waters in the world he can measure in the hollow of his hand, where we can hold but a little 
water; and the dry land he easily manages, for he comprehends the dust of the earth in a
measure, or with his three fingers; it is no more to him than a pugil, or that which we take up 
between our thumb and two fingers. 2. He has a vast strength, and can as easily move mountains 
and hills as the tradesman heaves his goods into the scales and out of them again; he poises 
them with his hand as exactly as if he weighed them in a pair of balances. This may refer to the 
work of creation, when the heavens were stretched out as exactly as that which is spanned, and 
the earth and waters were put together in just proportions, as if they had been measured, and 
the mountains made of such a weight as to serve for ballast to the globe, and no more. Or it may 
refer to the work of providence (which is a continued creation) and the consistency of all the 
creatures with each other.
 

5. JAMISON, “Lest the Jews should suppose that He who was just before described as a 
“shepherd” is a mere man, He is now described as GOD. 
Who — Who else but GOD could do so? Therefore, though the redemption and restoration of 
His people, foretold here, was a work beyond man’s power, they should not doubt its fulfillment 
since all things are possible to Him who can accurately regulate the proportion of the waters as 
if He had measured them with His hand (compare Isa_40:15). But Maurer translates: “Who can 
measure,” etc., that is, How immeasurable are the works of God? The former is a better 
explanation (Job_28:25; Pro_30:4). 
span — the space from the end of the thumb to the end of the middle finger extended; God 
measures the vast heavens as one would measure a small object with his span. 
dust of the earth — All the earth is to Him but as a few grains of dust contained in a small
measure (literally, “the third part of a larger measure”). 
hills in a balance — adjusted in their right proportions and places, as exactly as if He had 
weighed them out. 
 
 
6. K&D, “
In order to bring His people to the full consciousness of the exaltation of Jehovah, 
the prophet asks in 
Isa_40:12, “Who hath measured the waters with the hollow of his hand,
and regulated the heavens with a span, and taken up the dust of the earth in a third measure,
and weighed the mountains with a steelyard, and hills with balances?” Jehovah, and He alone, 
has given to all these their proper quantities, their determinate form, and their proportionate 
place in the universe. How very little can a man hold in the hollow of his hand (
sho‛al)! 
(Note: The root 
לשׁ, Arab. sl has the primary meaning of easily moving or being easily 
moved; then of being loose or slack, of hanging down, or sinking-a meaning which we meet 
with in לעשׁ and לאשׁ. Accordingly, sho‛al signifies the palm (i.e., the depression made by the 
hand), and 
sh
e
'ol not literally a hollowing or cavity, but a depression or low ground.) 
how very small is the space which a man's span will cover! how little is contained in the third of 
an ephah (
Hx t.ı̄sh; see at 
Psa_80:6)! and how trifling in either bulk or measure is the quantity 
you can weight in scales, whether it be a peles, i.e., a steelyard (statera), or  mo'zenayim, a 
tradesman's balance (bilances), consisting of two scales. 
(Note: According to the meaning, to level or equalize, which is one meaning of 
pilles, the 
noun 
peles is applied not only to a level used to secure equilibrium, which is called  mishqeleth 
in 
Isa_28:17, but also to a steelyard used for weighing, the beam of which consists of a lever 
with unequal arms, which flies up directly the weight is removed.) 
But what Jehovah measures with the hollow of His hand, and with His span, is nothing less 
than the waters beneath and the heavens above. He carries a scoop, in which there is room for 
all the dust of which the earth consists, and a scale on which He has weighed the great colossal 
mountains. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “12.Who hath measured? After having spoken of God’ friendly care in defending his
people, he now proclaims his power, and bestows upon it all possible commendations, which, however,

would produce less impression upon us, if we did not attend to the Prophet’ design. At first sight, ignorant
readers would think that the Prophet crowds together unfinished sentences, which would be absurd. But if
we look at his object, he adorns the power of God by a seasonable and elegant discourse, which is a true
support of our faith, that we may not hesitate to believe that he will do what he has promised. Not without
reason does Paul say that Abraham did not hesitate, because he believed that God who had promised
was able to perform what he had said. (Rom_4:20.) In the same sense also he testifies of himself in
another passage,

“ know whom I have believed; God is able to keep what I have committed to him.”

(2Ti_1:12.)

Such is also the import of those words of Christ,

“ Father who gave you to me is greater than all.”

(Joh_10:29.)

Since, therefore, we ought continually to strive against distrust, and since Satan attacks us by various
contrivances, it is of great importance that the promises of God should be believed by us, to give to his
power the praise which it deserves. Now, because the restoration of the people was beyond belief, it was
necessary that godly minds should he raised above the world, that they might not view the grace of God
as limited to human means.

We see that the Prophet does not merely teach that God is the Creator of heaven and earth, but applies
to the present subject all that he relates concerning God’ infinite power; and in like manner it is fitted for
our guidance. When any adversity befalls us, our salvation is hidden, and, as if a cloud had come
between, the power of God is concealed; we are held in astonishment, as if the Lord had forsaken and
overlooked us. Let us not, therefore, think that the Prophet speaks of some ordinary matter; for if this
conviction of the power of God were deeply seated in our hearts, we would not be so much alarmed, and
would not be disturbed by any calamity whatever. On this power, as we have said, Abraham leaned, that
he might cordially embrace what was otherwise incredible; and, accordingly, Paul affirms (Rom_4:18) that
“ hoped against hope;” for he believed that God was able to do what he had said, and did not waver or
stagger in his mind. We are thus taught to raise our eyes above this world, that we may not judge by
outward appearances, but may believe that what God hath spoken will come to pass; because all things
are at his disposal.

While this conviction is necessary for all, I have said that the Jews had very great need of it; for they were
pressed hard by very powerful enemies, they had no means of escape and no hope of freedom, and
nothing was to be seen on every hand but a large and frightful wilderness. In vain, therefore, would
consolation have been offered to them, had they not, at the suggestion of the Prophet, raised their minds
to heaven, and, disregarding the appearances of things, fixed their whole heart on the power of God.

When he names “” which are used by men in very small matters, he accommodates himself to our
ignorance; for thus does the Lord often prattle with us, and borrow comparisons from matters that are
familiar to us, when he speaks of his majesty; that our ignorant and limited minds may better understand
his greatness and excellence. Away, then, with all gross conceptions of God; for his greatness far
exceeds all creatures, so that heaven, and earth, and sea, and all that they contain, however vast may be
their extent, yet in comparison of him are nothing.  

 
8. EBC, “
GOD: A SACRAMENT  
SUCH are the Four Voices which herald the day of Israel’s redemption. They are scarcely silent, 
before the Sun Himself uprises, and horizon after horizon of His empire is displayed to the eyes 
of His starved and waiting people. From the prologue of the prophecy, in 
Isa_40:1-11, we 
advance to the presentation, in Isa_40:12-31 and Isa_41:1-29, of its primary and governing 
truth-the sovereignty and omnipotence of God, the God of Israel. 
We may well call this truth the sun of the new day which Israel is about to enter. For as it is the 
sun which makes the day, and not the day which reveals the sun; so it is God, supreme and 
almighty, who interprets, predicts, and controls His people’s history, and not their history, 
which, in its gradual evolution, is to make God’s sovereignty and omnipotence manifest to their 
experience. Let us clearly understand this. The prophecy, which we are about to follow, is an 
argument not so much from history to God as from God to history. Israel already have their 
God; and it is because He is what He is, and what they ought to know Him to be, that they are 
bidden believe that their future shall take a certain course. The prophet begins with God, and 
everything follows from God. All that in these chapters lends light or force, all that interprets the 
history of today and fills tomorrow with hope, fact, and promise alike, the captivity of Israel, the 
appearance of Cyrus, the fall of Babylon, Israel’s redemption, the extension of their mission to 
the ends of the earth, the conversion of the Gentiles, the equipment, discipline, and triumph of 
the Servant Himself, -we may even say the expanded geography of our prophet, the countries 
which for the first time emerge from the distant west within the vision of a Hebrew seer, -all are 
due to that primary truth about God with which we are now presented. It is God’s sovereignty 
which brings such far-off things into the interest of Israel; it is God’s omnipotence which 
renders such impossible things practicable. And as with the subjects, so with the style of the 
following chapters. The prophet’s style is throughout the effect of his perfect and brilliant 
monotheism. It is the thought of God which everywhere kindles his imagination. His most 
splendid passages are those, in which he soars to some lofty vision of the Divine glory in creation 
or history; while his frequent sarcasm and ridicule owe their effectiveness to the sudden scorn 
with which, from such a view, scattering epigrams the while, he sweeps down upon the 
heathen’s poor images, or Israel’s grudging thoughts of his God. The breadth and the force of his 
imagination, the sweep of his rhetoric, the intensity of his scorn, may all be traced to his sense of 
God’s sovereignty, and are the signs to us of how absolutely he was possessed by this as his main 
and governing truth. 
This, then, being the sun of Israel’s coming day, we may call what we find Isa_40:12-31 and 
Isa_41:1-29 the sunrise-the full revelation and uprising on outsight of this original gospel of the 
prophet. It is addressed to two classes of men; in Isa_11:12-16 to Israel, but in chapter 41 (for the 
greater part, at least) to the Gentiles. In dealing with these two classes the prophet makes a great 
difference. To Israel he presents their God, as it were, in sacrament; but to the Gentiles he urges 
God’s claims in challenge and argument. It is to the past that he summons Israel, and to what 
they ought to know already about their God; it is to the future, to history yet unmade, that he 
proposes to the Gentiles they should together appeal, in order to see whether his God or their 
gods are the true Deity. In this chapter we shall deal with the first of these-God in sacrament. 
The fact is familiar to all, that the Old Testament nowhere feels the necessity of proving the 
existence of God. That would have been a proof unintelligible to those to whom its prophets 
addressed themselves. In the time when the Old Testament came to him, man as little doubted 
the existence of God as he doubted his own life. But as life sometimes burned low, needing 
replenishment, so faith would grow despondent and morbid, needing to be led away from 
objects which only starved it, or produced, as idolatry did, the veriest delirium of a religion. A 

man had to get his faith lifted from the thoughts of his own mind and the works of his own hand, 
to be borne upon and nourished by the works of God, -to kindle with the sunrise, to broaden out 
by the sight of the firmament, to deepen as he faced the spaces of night, -and win calmness and 
strength to think life into order as he looked forth upon the marshalled hosts of heaven, having 
all the time no doubt that the God who created and guided these was his God. Therefore, when 
psalmist or prophet calls Israel to lift their eyes to the hills, or to behold how the heavens declare 
the glory of God, or to listen to that unbroken tradition, which day passes to day and night to 
night, of the knowledge of the Creator, it is not proofs to doubting minds which he offers: it is 
spiritual nourishment to hungry souls. These are not arguments - they are sacraments. When we 
Christians go to the Lord’s Supper, we go not to have the Lord proved to us, but to feed upon a 
life and a love of whose existence we are past all doubt. Our sacrament fills all the mouths by 
which needy faith is fed-such as outward sight, and imagination, and memory, and wonder, and 
love. Now very much what the Lord’s Supper is to us for fellowship with God and feeding upon 
Him, that were the glory of the heavens, and the everlasting hills, and the depth of the sea, and 
the vision of the stars to the Hebrews. They were the sacraments of God. By them faith was fed, 
and the spirit of man entered into the enjoyment of God, whose existence indeed he had never 
doubted, but whom he had lost, forgotten, or misunderstood. 
Now it is as such a minister of sacrament to God’s starved and disheartened people that our 
prophet appears in Isa_40:12-31. 
There were three elements in Israel’s starvation. Firstly, for nearly fifty years they had been 
deprived of the accustomed ordinances of religion. Temple and altar had perished; the common 
praise and the national religious fellowship were impossible; the traditional symbols of the faith 
lay far out of sight; there was at best only a precarious ministry of the Word. But, in the second 
place, this famine of the Word and of Sacraments was aggravated by the fact that history had 
gone against the people. To the baser minds among them, always ready to grant their allegiance 
to success, this could only mean that the gods of the heathen had triumphed over Jehovah. It is 
little wonder that such experience, assisted by the presentation, at every turn in their ways, of 
idols and a splendid idol-worship, the fashion and delight of the populations through whom they 
were mixed, should have tempted many Jews to feed their starved hearts at the shrines of their 
conquerors’ gods. But the result could only be the further atrophy of their religious nature. It has 
been held as a reason for the worship of idols that they excite the affection and imagination of 
the worshipper. They do no such thing: they starve and they stunt these. The image reacts upon 
the imagination, infects it with its own narrowness and poverty, till man’s noblest creative 
faculty becomes the slave of its own poor toy. But, thirdly, if the loftier spirits in Israel refused to 
believe that Jehovah, exalted in righteousness, could be less than the brutal deities whom 
Babylon vaunted over Him, they were flung back upon the sorrowful conviction that their God 
had cast them off; that He had retreated from the patronage of so unworthy a people into the 
veiled depths of His own nature. Then upon that heaven, from which no answer came to those 
who were once its favourites, they cast we can scarcely tell what reflection of their own weary 
and spiritless estate. As, standing over a city by night, you will see the majestic darkness above 
stained and distorted into shapes of pain or wrath by the upcast of the city’s broken, murky 
lights, so many of the nobler exiles saw upon the blank, unanswering heaven a horrible mirage 
of their own trouble and fear. Their weariness said, He is weary; the ruin of their national life 
reflected itself as the frustration of His purposes; their accusing conscience saw the darkness of 
His counsel relieved only by streaks of wrath. 
But none of these tendencies in Israel went so far as to deny that there was a God, or even to 
doubt His existence. This, as we have said, was nowhere yet the temptation of mankind. When 
the Jew lapsed from that true faith, which we have seen his nation carry into exile, he fell into 
one of the two tempers just described-devotion to false gods in the shape of idols, or 
despondency consequent upon false notions of the true God. It is against these tempers, one 

after another, that Isa_40:12-31 is directed. And so we understand why, though the prophet is 
here declaring the basis and spring of all his subsequent prophecy, he does not adopt the 
method of abstract argument. He is not treating with men who have had no true knowledge of 
God in the past, or whose intellect questions God’s reality. He is treating with men who have a 
national heritage of truth about God, but they have forgotten it; who have hearts full of religious 
affection, but it has been betrayed; who have a devout imagination, but it has been starved; who 
have hopes, but they are faint unto death. He will recall to them their heritage, rally their 
shrinking convictions by the courage of his own faith, feed their hunger after righteousness by a 
new hope set to noble music, and display to the imagination that has been stunted by so long 
looking upon the face of idols the wide horizons of Divine glory in earth and heaven. 
His style corresponds to his purpose. He does not syllogise; he exhorts, recalls, and convicts by 
assertion. The passage is a series of questions, rallies, and promises. "Have ye not known? have 
ye not heard?" is his chief note. Instead of arranging facts in history or nature as in themselves a 
proof for God, he mentions them only by way of provoking inward recollections. His sharp 
questions are as hooks to draw from his hearers’ hearts their timid and starved convictions, that 
he may nourish these upon the sacramental glories of nature and of history. 
Such a purpose and style trust little to method, and it would be useless to search for any strict 
division of strophes in the passage. The following, however, is a manifest division of subject, 
according to the two tempers to which the prophet had to appeal. Isa_40:12-25, and perhaps 
Isa_40:26, are addressed to the idolatrous Jews. But in Isa_40:26 there is a transition to the 
despair of the nobler hearts in Israel, who, though they continued to believe in the One True 
God, imagined that He had abandoned them; and to such Isa_40:27-31 are undoubtedly 
addressed. The different treatment accorded to the two classes is striking. The former of these 
the prophet does not call by any title of the people of God; with the latter he pleads by a dear 
double name that he may win them through every recollection of their gracious past, Jacob and 
Israel (Isa_40:27). Challenge and sarcasm are his style with the idolaters, his language clashing 
out in bursts too loud and rapid sometimes for the grammar, as in Isa_40:24; but with the 
despondent his way is gentle persuasiveness, with music that swells and brightens steadily, 
passing without a break from the minor key of pleading to the major of glorious promise. 
1. AGAINST THE IDOLATERS. A couple of sarcastic sentences upon idols and their 
manufacture (Isa_40:19-20) stand between two majestic declarations of God’s glory in nature 
and in history (Isa_40:12-17 and Isa_40:21-24). It is an appeal from the worshippers’ images to 
their imagination. "Who hath measured in his hollow hand the waters, and heaven ruled off with 
a span? Or caught in a tierce the dust of the earth, and weighed in scales mountains, and hills in 
a balance? Who hath directed the spirit of Jehovah, and as man of His counsel hath helped Him 
to know? With whom took He counsel, that such a one informed Him and taught Him in the 
orthodox path, and taught Him knowledge and helped Him to know the way of intelligence?" 
The term translated "orthodox path" is literally "path of ordinance or judgment, the regular 
path," and is doubtless to be taken along with its parallel, "way of intelligence," as a 
conventional phrase of education, which the prophet employed to make his sarcasm the 
stronger. "Lo nations! as a drop from a bucket, and like dust in a balance, are they reckoned. Lo 
the Isles! as a trifle He lifteth. And Lebanon is by no means enough for burning, nor its brute-life 
enough for an offering. All the nations are as nothing before Him, as spent and as waste are they 
reckoned for Him." 
When he has thus soared enough, as on an archangel’s wings, he swoops with one rapid question 
down from the height of his imagination upon the images. 
"To whom then will ye liken God, and what likeness will ye range by Him?" 

"The image! A smith cast it, and a smelter plates it with gold, and smelts silver chains. He 
that is straitened for an offering-he chooseth a tree that does not rot, seeks to him a cunning 
carver to set up an image that will not totter." 
The image shrivels up in face of that imagination; the idol is abolished by laughter. There is 
here, and for almost the first time in history, the same intellectual intolerance of images, the 
same burning sense of the unreasonableness of their worship, which has marked all 
monotheists, and turned even the meekest of their kind into fierce scorners and satirists-Elijah, 
Mohammed, Luther, and Knox. We hear this laughter from them all. Sometimes it may sound 
truculent or even brutal, but let us remember what is behind it. When we hear it condemned-as, 
in the interests of art and imagination, its puritan outbursts have often been condemned-as a 
barbarian incapacity to sympathise with the aesthetic instincts of man, or to appreciate the 
influence of a beautiful and elevating cult, we can reply that it was the imagination itself which 
often inspired both the laughter at, and the breaking of, images, and that, because the iconoclast 
had a loftier vision of God than the image-maker, he has, on the whole, more really furthered the 
progress of art than the artist whose works he has destroyed. It is certain, for instance, that no 
one would exchange the beauties of the prophecy now before us, with its sublime imaginations 
of God, for all the beauty of all the idols of Babylonia which it consigned to destruction. And we 
dare to say the same of two other epochs, when the uncompromising zeal of monotheists 
crushed to the dust the fruits of centuries of Christian art. The Koran is not often appealed to as 
a model of poetry, but it contains passages whose imagination of God, broad as the horizon of 
the desert of its birth, and swift and clear as the desert dawn, may be regarded as infinitely more 
than compensation-from a purely artistic point of view - for the countless works of Christian 
ritual and imagery which it inspired the rude cavalry of the desert to trample beneath the hoofs 
of their horses. And again, if we are to blame the reformers of Western Christendom for the 
cruelty with which they lifted their hammers against the carved work of the sanctuary, do not let 
us forget how much of the spirit of the best modem art is to be traced to their more spiritual and 
lofty conceptions of God. No one will question how much Milton’s imagination owed to his 
Protestantism, or how much Carlyle’s dramatic genius was the result of his Puritan faith. But it 
is to the spirit of the Reformation, as it liberated the worshipper’s soul from bondage to artificial 
and ecclesiastical symbols of the Deity, that we may also ascribe a large part of the force of that 
movement towards Nature add the imagination of God in His creation which inspired, for 
example, Wordsworth’s poetry, and those visual sacraments of rainbow, storm, and dawn to 
which Browning so often lifts our souls from their dissatisfaction with ritual or with argument. 
From his sarcasm on the idols our prophet returns to his task of drawing forth Israel’s memory 
and imagination. "Have ye not known? Have ye not heard? Hath it not been told you from the 
beginning? Have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth? He that is enthroned 
above the circle of the earth, and its dwellers are before Him as grasshoppers; who stretcheth as 
a fine veil the heavens, and spreadeth them like a dwelling tent" (that is, as easily as if they were 
not even a pavilion or marquee, but only a humble dwelling tent). "He who bringeth great men 
to nothing, the judges of the earth He maketh as waste. Yea, they were not planted; yea, they 
were not sown; yea, their root had not struck in the earth, but (immediately) He blew upon them 
and they withered, and a whirlwind like stubble carried them away. To whom, then, will ye liken 
Me, that I may match with him? saith the Holy One." But this time it is not necessary to suggest 
the idols; they were dissolved by that previous burst of laughter. Therefore, the prophet turns to 
the other class in Israel with whom he has to deal. 
2. TO THE DESPAIRERS OF THE LORD. From history we pass back to nature in Isa_40:26, 
which forms a transition, the language growing steadier from the impetuosity of the address to 
the idolaters to the serene music of the second part. Enough rebuke has the prophet made. As he 
now lifts his people’s vision to the stars, it is not to shame their idols, but to feed their hearts. 
"Lift up on high your eyes and see! Who hath created these? Who leads forth by number their 

host, and all of them calleth by name, by abundance of might, for He is powerful in strength, not 
one is amissing." Under such a night, that veils the confusion of earth only to bring forth all the 
majesty and order of heaven, we feel a moment’s pause. Then as the expanding eyes of the exiles 
gaze upon the infinite power above, the prophet goes on. "Why then sayest thou, O Jacob, and 
speakest, O Israel? Hidden is my way from Jehovah, and from my God my right hath passed." 
Why does the prophet point his people to the stars? Because he is among Israel on that vast 
Babylonian plain, from whose crowded and confused populations, struggling upon one 
monotonous level, there is no escape for the heart but to the stars. Think of that plain when 
Nebuchadrezzar was its tyrant; of the countless families of men torn from their far homes and 
crushed through one another upon its surface; of the ancient liberties that were trampled in that 
servitude, of the languages that were stifled in that Babel, of the many patriotisms set to sigh 
themselves out into the tyrant’s mud and mortar! Ah heaven! was there a God in thee, that one 
man could thus crush nations in his vat, as men crushed shell-fish in those days, to dye his 
imperial purple? Was there any Providence above, that he could tear peoples from the lands and 
seas, where their various gifts and offices for humanity had been developed, and press them to 
his selfish and monotonous servitude? In that medley of nations, all upon one level of captivity, 
Israel was just as lost as the most insignificant tribe; her history severed, her worship 
impossible, her very language threatened with decay. No wonder, that from the stifling crowd 
and desperate flatness of it all she cried, "Hidden is my way from Jehovah, and from my God my 
right hath passed." 
But from the flatness and the crowd the stars are visible; and it was upon the stars that the 
prophet bade his people feed their hearts. There were order and unfailing guidance; "for the 
greatness of His might not one is missing." And He is your God. Just as visible as those 
countless stars are, one by one, in the dark heavens, to your eyes looking up, so your lives and 
fortunes are to His eyes looking down on this Babel of peoples. "He gathereth the outcasts of 
Israel. He telleth the number of the stars." (Psa_147:1-20) And so the prophet goes on earnestly 
to plead: "Hast thou not known? Hast thou not heard? that an everlasting God is Jehovah. 
Creator of the ends of the earth. He fainteth not, neither is weary. There is no searching of His 
understanding. Giver to the weary of strength! And upon him that is of no might, he lavisheth 
power. Even youths may faint and be weary, and young men utterly fall; but they who hope in 
Jehovah shall renew strength, put forth pinions like eagles, run and not weary, walk and not 
faint." Listen, ears, not for the sake of yourselves only, though the music is incomparably sweet! 
Listen for the sake of the starved hearts below, to whom you carry the sacraments of hope, 
whom you lift to feed upon the clear symbols of God’s omnipotence and unfailing grace. 
This chapter began with the assurance to the heart of Israel of their God’s will to redeem and 
restore them. It closes with bidding the people take hope in God. Let us again emphasise-for we 
cannot do so too often, if we are to keep ourselves from certain errors of today on the subject of 
Revelation-the nature of this prophecy. It is not a reading-off of history; it is a call from God. No 
deed has yet been done pointing towards the certainty of Israel’s redemption; it is not from facts 
writ large on the life of their day, that the prophet bids the captives read their Divine discharge. 
That discharge he brings from God; he bids them find the promise and the warrant of it in their 
God’s character, in their own convictions of what that character is. In order to revive those 
convictions, he does, it is true, appeal to certain facts, but these facts are not the facts of 
contemporary history which might reveal to any clear eye, that the current and the drift of 
politics was setting towards the redemption of Israel. They are facts of nature and facts of 
general providence, which, as we have said, like sacraments evidence God’s power to the pious 
heart, feed it with the assurance of His grace, and bid it hope in His word, though history should 
seem to be working quite the other way. 

This instance of the method of revelation does not justify two opinions, which prevail at the 
present day regarding prophecy. In the first place, it proves to us that those are wrong who, too 
much infected by the modern temper to judge accurately writers so unsophisticated, describe 
prophecy as if it were merely a philosophy of history, by which the prophets deduced from their 
observation of the course of events their idea of God and their forecast of His purposes. The 
prophets had indeed to do with history; they argued from it, and they appealed to it. The history 
that was past was full of God’s condescension to men, and shone like Nature’s self with 
sacramental signs of His power and will: the history that was future was to be His supreme 
tribunal, and to afford the vindication of the word they claimed to have brought from Him. But 
still all this-their trust in history and their use of it-was something secondary in the prophetic 
method. With them God Himself was first; they came forth from His presence, as they describe 
it, with the knowledge of His will gained through the communion of their spirits with His Spirit. 
If they then appealed to past history, it was to illustrate their message; or to future, it was for 
vindication of this. But God Himself was the source and Author of it; and therefore, before they 
had facts beneath their eyes to corroborate their promises, they appealed to the people, like our 
prophet in chapter 40, to "wait on Jehovah." The day might not yet have dawned so as to let 
them read the signs of the times. But in the darkness they "hoped in Jehovah," and borrowed for 
their starved hearts from the stars above, or other sacrament, some assurance of His unfailing 
power. 
Jehovah, then, was the source of the prophet’s word: His character was its pledge. The prophets 
were not mere readers from history, but speakers from God. 
But the testimony of our chapter to all this enables us also to arrest an opinion about Revelation 
which has too hurriedly run off with some Christians, and to qualify it. In the inevitable recoil 
from the scholastic view of revelation as wholly a series of laws and dogmas and predictions, a 
number of writers on the subject have of late defined Revelation as a chain of historical acts, 
through which God uttered His character and will to men. According to this view, Revelation is 
God manifesting Himself in history, and the Bible is the record of this historical process. Now, 
while it is true that the Bible is, to a large extent, the annals and interpretation of the great and 
small events of a nation’s history-of its separation from the rest of mankind, its miraculous 
deliverances, its growth, its defeats and humiliations, its reforms and its institutions; in all of 
which God manifested His character and will-yet the Bible also records a revelation which 
preceded these historical deeds; a revelation the theatre of which was not the national 
experience, but the consciousness of the individual; which was recognised and welcomed by 
choice souls in the secret of their own spiritual life, before it was realised and observed in 
outward fact; which was uttered by the prophet’s voice and accepted by the people’s trust in the 
dark and the stillness, before the day of the Lord had dawned or there was light to see His 
purposes at work. In a word, God’s revelation to men was very often made clear in their 
subjective consciousness, before it became manifest in the history about them. 
And, for ourselves, let us remember that to this day true religion is as independent of facts as it 
was with the prophet. True religion is a conviction of the character of God, and a resting upon 
that alone for salvation. We need nothing more to begin with; and everything else, in our 
experience and fortune, helps us only in so far as it makes that primary conviction more clear 
and certain. Darkness may be over us, and we lonely and starved beneath it. We may be 
destitute of experience to support our faith; we may be able to discover nothing in life about us 
making in the direction of our hopes. Still, "let us wait on the Lord." It is by bare trust in Him 
that we "renew our strength, put forth wings like eagles, run and not weary, walk and not faint." 
Put forth wings-run-walk! Is the order correct? Hope swerves from the edge of so descending a 
promise, which seems only to repeat the falling course of nature-that droop, we all know, from 

short ambitions, through temporary impulsiveness to the old commonplace and routine. 
Soaring, running, walking-and is not the next stage, a cynic might ask, standing still? 
On the contrary, it is a natural and a true climax, rising from the easier to the more difficult, 
from the ideal to the real, from dream to duty, from what can only be the rare occasions of life to 
what must be life’s usual and abiding experience. History followed this course. Did the prophet, 
as he promised, think of what should really prove to be the fortune of his people during the next 
few years?-the great flight of hope, on which we see them rising in their psalms of redemption as 
on the wings of an eagle; the zeal and liberality of preparation for departure from Babylon; the 
first rush at the Return; and then the long tramp, day after day, with the slow caravan at the 
pace of its most heavily-laden beasts of burden, when "they shall walk and not faint" should 
indeed seem to them the sweetest part of their God’s promise. 
Or was it the far longer perspective of Israel’s history that bade the prophet follow this 
descending scale? The spirit of prophecy was with himself to soar higher than ever before, 
reaching by truly eagle-flight to a vision of the immediate consummation of Israel’s glory: the 
Isles waiting for Jehovah, the Holy City radiant in His rising, and open with all her gates to the 
thronging nations; the true religion flashing from Zion across the world, and the wealth of the 
world pouring back upon Zion. And some have wondered, and some scoff, that after this vision 
there should follow centuries of imperceptible progress-five-and-a-half centuries of preparation 
for the coming of the Promised Servant; and then-Israel, indeed gone forth over the world, but 
only in small groups, living upon the grudged and fitful tolerance of the great centres of Gentile 
civilisation. The prophet surely anticipates all this, when he places the walking after the soaring 
and the running. When he says at last, and most impressively, of his people’s fortunes, that they 
"shall walk and not faint," he has perhaps just those long centuries in view, when, instead of a 
nation of enthusiasts taking humanity by storm, we see small bands of pioneers pushing their 
way from city to city by the slow methods of ancient travel, -Damascus, Antioch, Tarsus, 
Iconium, Ephesus, Thessalonica, Athens, Corinth and Rome, -everywhere that Paul and the 
missionaries of the Cross found a pulpit and a congregation ready for the Gospel; toiling from 
day to day at their own trades, serving the alien for wages, here and there founding a synagogue, 
now and then completing a version of their Scriptures, often times achieving martyrdom, but 
ever living a pure and a testifying life in face of the heathen, with the passion of these prophecies 
at their hearts. It was certainly for such centuries and such men that the word was written, "they 
shall walk and not faint." This persistence under persecution, this monotonous drilling of 
themselves in school and synagogue, this slow progress without prize or praise along the 
common highways of the world and by the world’s ordinary means of livelihood, was a greater 
proof of indomitableness than even the rapture which filled their hearts on the golden eve of the 
return, under the full diapason of prophecy. 
And so must it ever be. First the ideal, and then the rush at it with passionate eyes, and then the 
daily trudge onward, when its splendour has faded from the view, but is all the more closely 
wrapped round the heart. For glorious as it is to rise to some great consummation on wings of 
dream and song, glorious as it is, also, to bend that impetus a little lower and take some practical 
crisis of life by storm, an even greater proof of our religion and of the help our God can give us is 
the lifelong tramp of earth’s common surface, without fresh wings of dream, or the excitement of 
rivalry, or the attraction of reward, but with the head cool, and the face forward, and every 
footfall upon firm ground. Let hope rejoice in a promise, which does not go off into the air, but 
leaves us upon solid earth; and let us hold to a religion which, while it exults in being the secret 
of enthusiasm and the inspiration of heroism, is daring and Divine enough to find its climax in 
the commonplace. 
 
 

 
9. BI 12-28, “
The grandeur of God 
The prophet’s notions of God are diffused through all the verses of the text. The prophet’s design 
in describing the Deity with so much magnificence is to discountenance idolatry, of which there 
are two sorts. 
1. Religious idolatry, which consists in rendering that religious worship to a creature which 
is due to none but God. 
2. Moral idolatry, which consists in distrusting the promises of God in dangerous crises, and 
in expecting that assistance from men which cannot but be expected from God. The portrait 
drawn by the prophet is infinitely inferior to his original. Ye will be fully convinced of this if 
ye attend to the following considerations of the grandeur of God. 
I. THE SUBLIMITY OF HIS ESSENCE. The prophet’s mind was filled with this object. It is 
owing to this that he repeats the grand title of Jehovah, “the Lord,” which signifies “I am” by 
excellence, and which distinguisheth by four grand characters the essence of God from the 
essence of creatures. 
1. The essence of God is independent in its cause. God is a self-existent being. We exist, but 
ours is only a borrowed existence, for existence is foreign from us. 
2. The essence of God is universal in its extent. God possesseth the reality of every thing that 
exists. He is, as an ancient writer expresseth it, a boundless ocean of existence. From this 
ocean of existence all created beings, like so many rivulets, flow. 
3. The essence of God is unchangeable in its exercise. Creatures only pass from nothing to 
existence, and from existence to nothing. We love to-day what we hated yesterday, and to-
morrow we shall hate What to-day we love. 
4. The Divine essence is eternal in its duration. “Hast thou not known,” saith our prophet, 
“that He is the everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth?” 
II. THE IMMENSITY OF HIS WORKS (
Isa_40:22; Isa_40:26). A novice is frightened at 
hearing what astronomers assert. Over all this universe God reigns. 
III. THE EFFICIENCY OF HIS WILL. The idea of the real world conducts us to that of the 
possible world. The idea of a creative Being includes the idea of a Being whose will is efficient. 
But a Being whose will is self-efficient, is a Being who, by a single act of His will, can create all 
possible beings: that is, all, the existence of which implies no contradiction; there being no 
reason for limiting the power of a will that hath been once efficient of itself. 
IV. THE MAGNIFICENCE OF SOME OF HIS MIGHTY ACTS, AT CER TAIN PERIODS, IN 
FAVOUR OF HIS CHURCH. The prophet had two of these periods in view. The first was the 
return of the Jews from that captivity in Babylon which he had denounced; and the second, the 
coming of the Messiah, of which their return from captivity was only a shadow. Such, then, are 
the grandeurs of God! Application—We observed that the prophet’s design was to render two 
sorts of idolatry odious: idolatry in religion, and idolatry in morals. Idolatry in religion consists 
in rendering those religious homages to creatures which are due to the Creator only. To discredit 
this kind of idolatry, the prophet contents himself with describing it. He shames the idolater by 
reminding him of the origin of idols, and of the pains taken to preserve them. A man is guilty of 
moral idolatry when, in dangerous crises, he says, ‘My way is hid from the Lord; my judgment is 
passed over from my God.’ God is the sole arbiter of events. Whenever ye think that any more 
powerful being directs them to comfort you, ye put the creature in the Creator s place; whether 
ye do it in a manner more or less absurd; whether formidable armies, impregnable fortresses, 

and well-stored magazines; or whether a small circle of friends, an easy income, or a country 
house. The Jews were often guilty of the first sort of idolatry. The captivity in Babylon was the 
last curb to that fatal propensity. Thanks be to God that the light of the Gospel hath opened the 
eyes of a great number of Christians in regard to idolatry in religion. Ye who, in order to avert 
public calamities, satisfy yourselves with a few precautions of worldly prudence, and take no 
pains to extirpate those horrible crimes which provoke the vengeance of heaven to inflict 
punishments on public bodies; ye are guilty of this second kind of idolatry. Were your 
confidence placed in God, ye would endeavour to avert national judgments by purging the state 
of those wicked practices which are the surest forerunners and the principal causes of famine, 
and pestilence, and war. And thou, feeble mortal, lying on a sick-bed, already struggling with the 
king of terrors; thou, who tremblingly complainest, I am undone!—thou art guilty of this second 
kind of idolatry, that thou hast trusted in man and made flesh thine arm. Were God the object of 
thy trust, thou wouldest believe that though death is about to separate thee from man, it is about 
to unite thee to God. (J. Saurin.) 
 
 
The incomparableness of the great God 
“To whom then will ye liken God?” 
I. THAT THE GREATEST THINGS IN THE MATERIAL WORLD ARE  NOTHING TO HIM. The 
ocean is great, great in its depths, breadths, contents, occupying by far the largest portion of this 
globe of ours. But He “hath measured the waters in the hollow of His hand.” The heaven is great; 
its expanse is immeasurable, its worlds and systems baffle all arithmetic, but He “meted out 
heaven with the span.” The earth is great, great to us, though mere speck in the universe, and, it 
may be, an atom to other intelligences; but “He comprehendeth the dust in a measure,” etc. 
What is the universe to God? You may compare an atom to the Andes, a raindrop to the Atlantic, 
a spark to the central fires of the creation; but you cannot compare the universe, great as it is, to 
the Creator. 
II. THAT THE GREATEST MINDS IN THE SPIRITUAL UNIVERSE AR E NOTHING TO HIM. 
“Who hath directed the Spirit of the Lord, or being His counsellor hath taught Him?” etc. 
(Isa_40:13-14). The Bible gives us to understand that there is a spiritual universe far greater 
than the material, of which the material is but the dim mirror and feeble instrument—a universe 
containing intelligences innumerable in multitude and incalculable in their gradations of 
strength and intelligence. But what spirit or spirits at the head or hierarchy of these intelligences 
has ever given Him counsel, instructed or influenced Him in any matter? He is uninstructible: 
the only Being in the universe who is so. He knows all. Sooner speak of a spark enlightening the 
sun, than speak of a universe of intelligences adding aught to the knowledge of God. He is 
absolutely original: the only Being in the universe who is so. We talk of original thinkers. Such 
creatures are mere fictions. He being so independent of all minds— 
1. His universe must be regarded as the expression of Himself. No other being had a hand in 
it. 
2. His laws are the revelation of Himself. No one counselled Him in His legislation. 
3. His conduct is absolutely irresponsible, and He alone can be trusted with irresponsibility. 
III. THAT THE GREATEST INSTITUTIONS IN HUMAN SOCIETY ARE  NOTHING TO HIM. 
Nations are the greatest things “in” human institutions. “But nations are as a drop of a bucket, 
and are counted as the small dust of the balance.” What were the greatest nations of the old 
world, or the most powerful of modem times? What are the greatest nations that have ever been, 
or are, compared to Him? Nothing, emptiness. Oh, ye magnates of the world, ye kings of the 
earth, what are ye in the presence of God? Less than animalcula dancing in the sun. 

IV. THAT THE GREATEST PRODUCTIONS OF HUMAN LABOUR ARE N OTHING TO HIM. 
“There is,” said an eloquent French preacher, “nothing great but God.” (Homilist.) 
 
 
The transcendent One 
The grand object of this sublime chapter seems to be to inspirit and to comfort the Jews in their 
Babylonian captivity. Their God in His transcendent greatness is brought under their notice for 
this purpose— 
I. IN THE EXACTITUDE OF HIS OPERATIONS. He is here represented as “measuring” the 
waters, as “spanning” the heavens, as “comprehending” the very dust of the earth in a measure, 
as “weighing” the mountains in scales. As the physician adjusts in nicest proportions the 
elements in the medical dose, with which he hopes to cure his patient; the engineer every crank 
and wheel and pin in the machine which he has constructed for a certain purpose, so God—only 
in an Infinite degree—arranges all the parts of the complicated universe. It is seen in the 
atmosphere that surrounds this globe; were one of its constituent elements more or less than it 
is the whole would be disturbed. This is seen in the punctuality with which all the heavenly orbs 
perform their movements; they are never out of time. It is seen, in fact, in the unbroken 
uniformity with which all nature proceeds on its march. 
1. This Divine exactitude should inspire us with unbounded confidence in His procedure. 
Because God works with such infinite precision, His works admit of no improvement. 
2. This Divine exactitude should inspire us to imitate Him in this respect. When we act from 
blind impulse, or from imperfect reflection, we risk our wellbeing. 
II. IN THE ALMIGHTINESS OF HIS POWER. He is here represented as holding the waters in 
the “hollow of His hand.” In thinking of this power we should remember— 
1. That all this power is under the direction of intelligence. It is not a blind force, like the 
force of the storm or the tornado, but it is a force directed by the highest wisdom. Wisdom 
uses the whole as the smith uses his hammer on the anvil, as the mariner the rudder in the 
tempest. 
2. That all this power is inspired by benevolence. The infinite is here portrayed. 
III. IN THE INDEPENDENCY OF HIS MIND. “With whom took He  counsel, and who 
instructed Him?” From this absolute mental independency of God the following things may be 
deduced— 
1. That all His operations must originate in pure sovereignty. All that exists must be traced 
to the counsels of His own will, for He had no counsellor. 
2. That all His laws must be a transcript of His mind. What they are He is; they are the 
history of Himself. Conclusion—What an argument is” here for an entire surrender to, and a 
thorough acquiescence in, the Divine will. (Homilist.) 
 
 
The greatness of Israel’s God 
How little the palm of a man takes, how little the space which the span of a man can cover, how 
scanty the third of an ephah and for what insignificant measures a balance suffices, whether a 
steelyard (statera), or a retail balance (libra) consisting of two scales (lances). But what Jehovah 
measures with His palm and regulates with His span is nothing less than the waters below and 
the heavens above. He uses a shalish, in which the dust composing the earth finds place, and a 

balance in which He weighs the colossus of the mountains. (F. Delitzsch, D. D.) 
 
 
God in relation to earth and ocean 
Put two tablespoonfuls of water in the palm of your hand and it will overflow; but Isaiah 
indicates that God puts the Atlantic and the Pacific and the Arctic and the Antarctic and the 
Mediteranean and the Black Sea and all the waters of the earth in the hollow of His hand. The 
fingers the beach on one side, the wrist the beach on the other. “He holdeth the water in the 
hollow of His hand.” As you take a pinch of salt or powder between your thumb and two fingers, 
so Isaiah indicates God takes up the earth. He measures the dust of the earth. The original there 
indicates that God takes all the dust of all the continents between the thumb and two fingers. (T.
De Witt Talmage, D. D.) 
 
 
The great God in His relation to heaven and earth 
There was an engineer by the name of Strasicrates who was in the employ of Alexander the 
Great, and he offered to hew a mountain in the shape of his master, the Emperor, the enormous 
figure to hold in the left hand a city of 10,000 inhabitants, while with the right hand it was to 
hold a basin large enough to collect all the mountain torrents. Alexander applauded his 
ingenuity, out forbade the enterprise because of its costliness. Yet I have to tell you that our King 
holds in His one hand all the cities of the earth, and with the other all the oceans, while He has 
the stars of heaven for a tiara. (T. DeWitt Talmage, D. D.) 
 
 
God weighing the mountains 
What are all the balances of earthly manipulation compared with the balances that Isaiah saw 
suspended when he saw God putting into the scales the Alps and the Apennines and Mount 
Washington and the Sierra Nevadas? You see the earth had to be ballasted. It would not do to 
have too much weight in Europe, or too much weight in Asia, or too much weight in Africa or in 
America; so when God made the mountains He weighed them. God knows the weight of the 
great ranges that cross the continents, the tons, the pounds avoirdupois, the ounces, the grains, 
the milligrammes. (T. De Witt Talmage, D. D.) 
 
 
“Why sayest thou?” 
The devout thought of these paragraphs passes in survey, first the earth (Isa_40:12-20); then 
the heavens (21-26); finally, the experience of the children of God in all ages (27-31). 
I. THE TESTIMONY OF THE EARTH. It seems as though we are conducted to the shores of the 
Mediterranean, and stationed somewhere near the site of ancient Tyre. Before us spreads the 
Great Sea, as the Hebrews were wont to call it. Far across the waters, calm and tranquil, or 
heaving in memory of recent storms, sea and sky blend in the circle of the horizon. Now 
remember, says the prophet, God’s hands are so strong and great that all that ocean and all 
other oceans lie in them as a drop on a man’s palm And this God is our God for ever and ever. 
All men may be in arms against thee: encircling thee with threats, and plotting to swallow thee 
up. But the nations are to Him as the drop of a bucket, and are counted as the small dust of the 
balance. Thou hast no reason, therefore, to be afraid. 

II. THE TESTIMONY OF THY HEAVENS. The scene shifts to the heavens, and all that is 
therein. This is the antidote of fear. Sit in the heavenlies. Do not look from earth towards 
heaven, but from heaven towards earth. Let God, not man, be the standpoint of vision. But this 
is not all. To this inspired thinker, it seemed as though the blue skies were curtains that God had 
stretched out as a housewife gauze (see Revised Version, marg.), or the fabric of a tent within 
which the pilgrim rests. If creation be His tent, which He fills in all its parts, how puny are the 
greatest potentates of earth! The child of God need not be abashed before the greatest of earthly 
rulers. And even this is not all—day changes to night, and as the twilight deepens, the stars come 
out in their hosts; and suddenly, to the imagination of this lofty soul, the vault of heaven seems a 
pasture-land over which a vast flock is following its Shepherd, who calls each by name. What a 
sublime conception! Jehovah, the Shepherd of the stars, leading them through space; 
conducting them with such care and might that none falls out of rank, or is lacking. And will 
Jehovah do so much for stars, and nought for sons? 
III. THE TESTIMONY OF THE SAINTS. “Hast thou not heard?” It has been a commonplace 
with every generation of God’s people, that “the Lord fainteth not, neither is weary.” He never 
takes up a case to drop it. He never begins to build a character to leave it when it is half 
complete. He may seem to forsake and to plunge the soul into needless trial; this, however, is no 
indication that He has tired of His charge, but only that He could not fulfil the highest 
blessedness of some soul He loved save by the sternest discipline. “There is no searching of His 
understanding.” There is another point on which all the saints are agreed, that neither weariness 
nor fainting are barriers to the forth-putting of God’s might. On the contrary, they possess an 
infinite attractiveness to His nature. (F. B. Meyer, B. A.) 
 
 
Nature ministers to the suffering 
Nature has always been the resort of the suffering. Elijah to Horeb; Christ to Olivet. And in these 
glowing paragraphs, which touch the high-water mark of sacred eloquence, we are led forth to 
stand in the curtained tent of Jehovah, to listen to the beat of the surf, and watch the march of 
the stars. (F. B. Meyer, B. A.) 
 
 
 
 
13 Who can fathom the Spirit[d] of the Lord, 
    or instruct the Lord as his counselor? 
 
1.BARNES, “Who hath directed - This passage is quoted by Paul in 
Rom_11:34, and 
referred to by him in 1Co_2:16. The word rendered ‘directed’ here (ןכת  tiken) is the same which 

is used in the previous verse, ‘and meted out heaven.’ The idea here is, ‘Who has fitted, or 
disposed the mind or spirit of Yahweh? What superior being has ordered, instructed, or 
disposed his understanding? Who has qualified him for the exercise of his wisdom, or for the 
formation and execution of his plans?’ The sense is, God is supreme. No one has instructed or 
guided him, but his plans are his own, and have all been formed by himself alone. And as those 
plans are infinitely wise, and as he is not dependent on anyone for their formation or execution, 
his people may have confidence in him, and believe that he will be able to execute his purposes. 
The Spirit - The word ‘spirit’ is used in the Bible in a greater variety of senses than almost 
any other word (see the note at Isa_40:7). It seems here to be used in the sense of mind, and to 
refer to God himself. There is no evidence that it refers to the Holy Spirit particularly. ‘The word 
spirit, he uses,’ says Calvin, ‘for reason, judgment. He borrows the similitude from the nature of 
mankind, in order that he may more accommodate himself to them; nor, as it seems to me, does 
he here speak of the essential Spirit of God’ (Commentary in loc). The design of the prophet is 
not to refer to the distinction in the divine nature, or to illustrate the special characteristics of 
the different persons of the Godhead; but it is to set forth the wisdom of Yahweh himself, the 
one infinite God, as contradistinguished from idols, and as qualified to guide, govern, and 
deliver his people. The passage should not be used, therefore, as a proof-text in regard to the 
existence and wisdom of the Holy Spirit, but is suited to demonstrate only that God is untaught; 
and that he is independent and infinite in his wisdom. 
Or being his counselor - Margin, as in Hebrew, ‘Man of his counsel.’ He is not dependent 
for counsel on men or angels. He is supreme, independent, and infinite. None is qualified to 
instruct him; and all, therefore, should confide in his wisdom and knowledge. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
Who hath directed the Spirit of the Lord,.... In the creation of all things, in 
garnishing the heavens, and moving upon the face of the waters? not anyone, angel or man; 
there were none with him, nor did he need any to guide and direct him what to do 
(s):  
 
or being his counsellor, hath taught him? or, "the man of his counsel (t)"; there was no 
other than the Wonderful Counsellor, the Angel of the great council, the essential Word of God, 
whose spirit is here spoken of.  
 
(s) The Targum is, "who hath directed the Holy Spirit in the mouth of all the prophets? is it not 
the Lord?" which agrees with the accents; for so according to them the words should be 
rendered "who hath directed the Spirit? the Lord"; so Reinbeck, de Accent. Heb. p. 418. and who 
renders the next clause, and he hath made the man of his counsel (Moses) to know that.  
 
3. HENRY, “
His wisdom is unsearchable, and what no creature can give either information or 
direction to, 
Isa_40:13, Isa_40:14. As none can do what God has done and does, so none can 
assist him in the doing of it or suggest any thing to him which he thought not of. When the Lord 
by his Spirit made the world (Job_26:13) there was none that directed his Spirit, or gave him 
any advice, either what to do or how to do it. Nor does he need any counsellor to direct him in 
the government of the world, nor is there any with whom he consults, as the wisest kings do with 
those that know law and judgment, Est_1:13. God needs not to be told what is done, for he 
knows it perfectly; nor needs he be advised concerning what is to be done, for he knows both the 
right end and the proper means. This is much insisted upon here, because the poor captives had 
no politicians among them to manage their concerns at court or to put them in a way of gaining 

their liberty. “No matter,” says the prophet, “you have a God to act for you, who needs not the 
assistance of statesmen.” In the great work of our redemption by Christ matters were concerted 
before the world was, when there was one to teach God in the path of judgment, 1Co_2:7. 
 
4. JAMISON, “
Quoted in 
Rom_11:34; 1Co_2:16. The Hebrew here for “directed” is the same as 
in Isa_40:12 for “meted out”; thus the sense is, “Jehovah measures out heaven with His span”; 
but who can measure Him? that is, Who can search out His Spirit (mind) wherewith He 
searches out and accurately adjusts all things? Maurer rightly takes the Hebrew in the same 
sense as in Isa_40:12 (so Pro_16:2; Pro_21:2), “weigh,” “ponder.” “Direct,” as in English
Version, answers, however, better to “taught” in the parallel clause. 
 
5. K&D, “
A second question follows in 
Isa_40:13, Isa_40:14. “Who regulated the Spirit of
Jehovah, and (who) instructed Him as His counsellor? With whom took He counsel, and who
would have explained to Him and instructed Him concerning the path of right, and taught
Him knowledge, and made known to Him a prudent course?” The first question called to mind 
the omnipotence of Jehovah; this recalls His omniscience, which has all fulness in itself, and 
therefore precludes all instruction from without. “The Spirit of Jehovah” is the Spirit which 
moved upon the waters at the creation, and by which chaos was reduced to order. “Who,” 
inquires this prophet - “who furnished this Spirit with the standard, according to which all this 
was to be done?” ן ֵI ִz as in Isa_40:12, to bring into conformity with rule, and so to fit for 
regulated working. Instead of mercha tifchah athnach, which suggests the Targum rendering, 
“quis direxit spiritum? Jehova” (vid., Pro_16:2), it would be more correct to adopt the 
accentuation tifchah munach athnach (cf., Exo_21:24; Exo_23:9), and there are certain codices 
in which we find this (see Dachselt). In Isa_40:13 we might follow the Septuagint translation, κα
{5B‘Y5y6Bü|5JrA}ü31üY5~k0’-Bü5•Y5JrA}:}d (Rom_11:34; 1Co_2:16, συ8βιβάσει) α4τόν, but in this 
case we miss the verb ה ָי ָה. The rendering we have given above is not so harsh, and the 
accentuation is indifferent here, since silluk is never written without tifchahif only a single word 
precedes it. In Isa_40:14 the reciprocal 3ַעוֹנ is connected with ת ֵא = 3ִםא. The futt. cons. retain their 
literal meaning: with whom did He consult, so that he supplied Him with understanding in 
consequence (
hebhı̄n, generally to understand, here in a causative sense). The verbs of 
instruction are sometimes construed with 
3ְE of the lesson taught, sometimes with a double 
accusative. In reply to the questions in Isa_40:13, Isa_40:14, which are essentially one, Israel 
must acknowledge that its God is the possessor of absolute might, and also of absolute wisdom. 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “13.Who instructed the Spirit of Jehovah? What the Prophet had formerly taught
concerning the Lord’ goodness and power he now adds concerning his wisdom. And we ought to observe
the connection; for, us carnal sense wickedly limits the power of God to human means, so it improperly
subjects his inscrutable counsel to human reasonings. Till God be exalted above all creatures, many
difficulties present themselves to interrupt the course of his works; and, therefore, if we form a judgment
according to our own opinion, various scruples will immediately arise. Thus, whenever we do not see how
God will do this or that, we doubt if it will take place; because what surpasses our reason appears to be
impossible. Consequently, as we ought to contrast, the power of God with our weakness, so our

insolence ought to be repressed by his incomparable, wisdom.

By inquiring, who guided or directed the Spirit of God, he means that God had no need of a teacher, to go
before and inform him about things unknown. Spirit here denotes reason, judgment, or understanding; for
he borrows a comparison from the nature of men, that he may more fully accommodate himself to them;
and I do not think that this ought to be understood as denoting the essential Spirit of God.  
 
 
 
14 Whom did the Lord consult to enlighten him, 
    and who taught him the right way? 
Who was it that taught him knowledge, 
    or showed him the path of understanding? 
 
1.BARNES, “With whom took he counsel - The sentiment of the former verse is repeated 
here, in order, probably, to make it more emphatic. 
In the path of judgment - The way of judging correctly and wisely; or the way of 
administering justice. It denotes here his boundless wisdom as it is seen in the various 
arrangements of his creation and providence, by which all things keep their places, and 
accomplish his vast designs. 
 
2. GILL, “
With whom took he counsel, and who instructed him ,.... This is the same as 
before, only repeated in other words, the more strongly to deny that any mere creature 
counselled, taught, and instructed the Spirit of Christ, in the ordering and managing the works 
of creation: 
 
 
and taught him in the path of judgment, and taught him knowledge, and showed to 
him the way of understanding? or gave him that judgment, knowledge, and understanding 
in framing the world, and all things in it, in that beautiful and regular manner that it is; which 
shows it to be a work of wisdom, more than human or angelical, and to be purely divine; no one, 
angel or man, could have struck out such a path of judgment, such a way of understanding, or 
showed such exquisite skill and knowledge, as appear in the works of creation; see 
Psa_104:24. 

 
3. JAMISON, “
path of judgment — His wisdom, whereby He so beautifully adjusts the 
places and proportions of all created things.
 
 
 
4. CALVIN, “14.From whom took he counsel? The Prophet expresses the same thing in many ways;
that we may know that nothing is more foolish than man, (115) when he ventures to lift himself up into
heaven, to examine or judge by his own ability the works of God. In these words, therefore, Isaiah
intended to repress more and more the insolence and rashness of men. Paul quotes this proof for the
same purpose, to deter us from judging of the unsearchable counsel of God; for God does not wish us to
inquire concerning his wisdom but in a sober and becoming manner. (Rom_11:34.) There is one
difference, that Paul affirms that the spiritual mystery of the gospel cannot be fathomed by the human
understanding, while the Prophet pronounces a commendation, in general terms, on the providence of
God. But on both points we ought to learn humility, and to bring all our senses captive to obedience. All
the reason or understanding that we have is mere darkness, till we have been enlightened by Christ.



(115) “Que l’ est plus beste que los bestes mesmes.” “ man is more a beast than the beasts themselves.”  
 
 
15 Surely the nations are like a drop in a bucket; 
    they are regarded as dust on the scales; 
    he weighs the islands as though they were fine dust. 
 
1.BARNES, “Behold, the nations - All the nations of the earth. This is designed to show 
the greatness of God, in comparison with that which strikes man as great - a mighty nation; and 
the main object seems to be, to show that God could accomplish his purposes without their aid, 
and that they could not resist him in the execution of his plans. If they were as nothing in 
comparison with him, how easily could he execute his purposes! If they were as nothing, how 
little could they resist the execution of his plans! 
Are as a drop of a bucket - In comparison with him; or are so esteemed by him. The drop 
that falls from the bucket in drawing water is a trifle. It has no power, and compared with the 

waters of the ocean it is as nothing. So small is the power of the nations in comparison with God. 
“And are counted.” Are thought of, regarded, esteemed by him, or in comparison with him. 
As the small dust of the balance - The small, fine dust which collects on the best finished 
and most accurate balance or scales, and which has no effect in making the scales uneven, or 
making either side preponderate. Nothing can be a more striking representation of the fact that 
the nations are regarded as nothing in comparison with God. 
Behold, he taketh up the isles - Or he is able to do it; he could remove the isles as the fine 
dust is driven before the whirlwind. A more literal translation of this passage would be, ‘Lo, the 
isles are as the dust which is taken up,’ or which one takes up; that is, which is taken up, and 
carried away by the wind. There is something unusual in the expression that God takes up the 
isles, and the idea is rather that the isles in his sight are regarded as the fine dust which the wind 
sweeps away. So the Chaldee renders it, ‘Lo, the isles are like ashes which the wind drives away.’ 
The word ‘isles,’ Vitringa and Jerome regard as denoting not the small portions of land in the 
sea that are surrounded by water, but lands which are encompassed and enclosed Mesopotamia. 
But there is no reason why it should not be taken here in its usual signification, as denoting the 
islands of the sea. They would serve well to be used in connection with mountains and hills in 
setting forth the vast power of God. 
As a very little thing - (קדכ  k
e
ddaq). The word קד  daq means theft which is beaten small, or 
fine; and then fine dust, chaff, or any light thing which the wind easily sweeps away. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket,.... Not only the Chaldeans and 
Babylonians, and other nations most known, and most troublesome to the Jews, but all the 
nations of the world; these, in comparison of God, of his infinite and immense Being, are but as 
a drop of water that hangs upon the bucket, or falls from it, when water is drawn by it, or is left 
in it, when poured out of it; which is nothing in comparison of the well out of which the water is 
drawn, or even of the water in the bucket drawn out of it: 
 
 
and are accounted as the small dust of the balance; that is, they are accounted nothing 
of with God, comparatively speaking, any more than the small dust which hangs upon the 
balance, and gives it no weight, nor turn one way or another, and so is of no consideration. The 
Septuagint, Vulgate Latin, Syriac, and Arabic versions, render it, "as the turn of the scale"; and 
so the Targum; but the other version more strongly expresses the sense:  
 
behold, he taketh up the isles as a very little thing; by which are meant not merely 
islands, properly so called, which are encompassed by the sea, but all such countries which the 
Jews used to go to by sea, for all such they called isles; these the Lord can take up, or cast away 
(u), as some render the word; toss them about, overturn and destroy, as a man may take up the 
most minute thing and cast it from him. The Targum renders it,  
 
"as chaff which flies away;''  
 
or, as others translate it,  
 
"as the ashes of a coal which fly away.''  
 

The word may signify any light thing, as chaff, straw, stubble, feathers, down of thistles, which 
are easily carried away with the least force; and so Vitringa renders the words, "behold, the isles 
are as some little thing which flies away".  
 
 
3. HENRY, “
The nations of the world are nothing in comparison of him, 
Isa_40:15, Isa_40:17. 
Take them all together, all the great and mighty nations of the earth, kings the most pompous, 
kingdoms the most populous, both the most wealthy; take the isles, the multitude of them, the 
isles of the Gentiles: Before him, when they stand in competition with him or in opposition to 
him, they are as a drop of the bucket compared with the vast ocean, or the small dust of the
balance (which does not serve to turn it, and therefore is not regarded, it is so small) in 
comparison with all the dust of the earth. He takes them up, and throws them away from him, as
a very little thing, not worth speaking of. They are all in his eye as nothing, as if they had no 
being at all; for they add nothing to his perfection and all-sufficiency. They are counted by him, 
and are to be counted by us in comparison of him, less than nothing, and vanity. When he 
pleases, he can as easily bring them all into nothing as at first he brought them out of nothing. 
When God has work to do he values not either the assistance or the resistance of any creature. 
They are all vanity; the word that is used for the chaos (Gen_1:2), to which they will at last be 
reduced. Let this beget in us high thoughts of God and low thoughts of this world, and engage us 
to make God, and not man, both our fear and our hope. This magnifies God's love to the world, 
that, though it is of such small account and value with him, yet, for the redemption of it, he gave
his only3begotten Son, Joh_3:16. 
 
4. JAMISON, “
of — rather, (hanging) from a bucket [Maurer]. 
he taketh up ... as a very little thing — rather, “are as a mere grain of dust which is taken 
up,” namely, by the wind; literally, “one taketh up,” impersonally (
Exo_16:14) [Maurer]. 
isles — rather, “lands” in general, answering to “the nations” in the parallel clause; perhaps 
lands, like Mesopotamia, enclosed by rivers [Jerome] (so Isa_42:15). However, English Version, 
“isles” answers well to “mountains” (Isa_40:12), both alike being lifted up by the power of God; 
in fact, “isles” are mountains upheaved from the bed of the sea by volcanic agency; only that he 
seems here to have passed from unintelligent creatures (Isa_40:12) to intelligent, as nations and 
lands, that is, their inhabitants. 
 
 
5. K&D, “
From His exaltation as Creator, the prophet now proceeds to His exaltation as 
Governor of the world. “Behold, nations like a little drop on a bucket, and like a grain of sand in
a balance, are they esteemed; behold, islands like an atom of dust that rises in the air.” Upon 
Jehovah, the King of the world, does the burden rest of ruling over the whole human race, which 
is split up into different nations; but the great masses of people over whom Jehovah rules are no 
more burden to Him than a drop hanging upon a bucket is a burden to the man who carries it 
(min is used in the same sense as in 
Son_4:1; Son_6:5), no more than the weight in a balance is 
perceptibly increased or diminished by a grain of sand that happens to lie upon it ( shachaq, from 
Hx tex ", to grind to powder). The islands, those fragments of firm ground in the midst of the 
ocean (י ִא = ivy, from הָוc, to betake one's self to a place, and remain there), upon which the 
heathen world was dispersed (Gen 10), are to Him who carries the universe like the small 

particle of dust (ק ַG from ק ַק ָG, to crush or pulverize), which is lifted up, viz., by the slightest 
breath of wind (לוֹ? ִי metaplastic fut. niph. of  tul = s tS ., cf., Isa_63:9). The rendering of Knobel, 
“dust which is thrown,” would require ר ָפ ָע (Isa_41:2); and neither that of Gesenius, viz., “He 
takes up islands like a particle of dust,” nor that of Hitzig, “He carries islands,” etc., is 
admissible, for לוּט = ל ַטָנ signifies tollere, not portare; and the former, viz., insulas tollit, 
furnishes no answer to the question, “How so, and to what end?” 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “15.Behold, the nations are as a drop of a bucket. If we wish to understand the Prophet’
meaning, and to read these words with advantage, we must (as I remarked a little before) understand his
design. He does not celebrate the greatness of God in a detached manner, but extols it with the utmost.
possible adaptation to the present subject, that Israelites may know that this shield alone is sufficient to
protect them, and that they will have no reason to dread the efforts, or rage, or violence of the world, if
God be reconciled to them, and that they may thus learn to betake themselves to God’ protection; for if
they were not fully convinced of this, there would arise at every moment various causes of despair. Isaiah
thus continues the subject, when he says that all nations and peoples are nothing when compared with
God; for, by simply breathing on them, he will scatter like small dust all the inhabitants of the earth. In
consequence of our being excessively prone and foolishly ingenious in devising reasons of distrust, we
imagine that everything that Satan does for the purpose of hindering our salvation blocks up the path of
God. For the purpose of correcting this error, the Prophet declares that all the creatures are nothing
before God, and that all the nations resemble small and inconsiderable drops of water. Hence we infer
that nothing can be more contrary to reason than to exalt creatures for the sake of diminishing the power
of God, which is high above all, and ought to be so acknowledged.  
 
 
16 Lebanon is not sufficient for altar fires, 
    nor its animals enough for burnt offerings. 
 
 
1.BARNES, “And Lebanon - The expression here refers to the trees or the cedars of 
Lebanon. Thus it is rendered by the Chaldee: ‘And the trees of Lebanon.’ For a description of 
Lebanon, see the note at 
Isa_10:34. It is probable that the word Lebanon here is not used in the 
limited sense in which it is sometimes employed, to denote a single mountain, or a single range 
of mountains, but includes the entire ranges lying north of Palestine, and which were 

comprehended under the general name of Libanus. The idea here is, that all these ranges of 
mountains, abounding in magnificent trees and forests, would not furnish fuel sufficient to burn 
the sacrifices which would be an appropriate offering to the majesty and glory of God. 
To burn - To burn for the purpose of consuming the sacrifice. 
Nor the beasts thereof for a burnt-offering - As the mountains of Lebanon were 
extensive forests, they would abound with wild animals. The idea is, that all those animals, if 
offered in sacrifice, would not be an appropriate expression of what was due to God. It may be 
remarked here, if all the vast forests of Lebanon on fire, and all its animals consumed as an 
offering to God, were not sufficient to show forth his glory, how little can our praises express the 
proper sense of his majesty and honor! How profound should be our reverence for God! With 
what awful veneration should we come before him! The image employed here by Isaiah is one of 
great poetic beauty; and nothing, perhaps, could give a deeper impression of the majesty and 
honor of the great Yahweh. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
And Lebanon is not sufficient - The image is beautiful and uncommon. It 
has been imitated by an apocryphal writer, who however comes far short of the original: -  
“For all sacrifice is too little for a sweet savor unto thee: 
And all the fat is not sufficient for thy burnt-offering.” 
Judith 16:16.
Does not the prophet mean here that all the burnt-offerings and sacrifices that could be 
offered were insufficient to atone for sin? That the nations were as nothing before him, not 
merely because of his immensity, but because of their insufficiency to make any atonement by 
their oblations for the iniquities which they had committed? Therefore the Redeemer was to 
come to Zion, etc. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
And Lebanon is not sufficient to burn,.... The trees of it, as the Targum; these 
are not sufficient to burn a sacrifice with, suitable to the dignity and majesty of God, and as his 
justice can require for offences committed:  
 
nor the beasts thereof sufficient for a burnt offering, though it was a mountain and 
forest which abounded with trees, and especially cedars, and there was a great quantity of cattle 
in it, yet neither were sufficient to furnish out a proper burnt offering to the Lord; he only 
himself could provide a Lamb sufficient for a burnt offering, and he has done it, the only 
begotten Son of God; he has offered himself an offering and a sacrifice to God, of a sweet 
smelling savour, by which he has put away sin, and made full atonement for it, Jarchi thinks this 
is said to aggravate the sins of men, of the wicked, which were so great, that Lebanon with all its 
wood and cattle could not furnish out a sacrifice sufficient to expiate them. 
 
4. HENRY, “
The services of the church can make no addition to him nor do they bear any 
proportion to his infinite perfections (
Isa_40:16): Lebanon is not sufficient to burn; not the 
wood of it, to be for the fuel of the altar, though it be so well stocked with cedars; not the beasts 
of it, to be for sacrifices, though it be so well stocked with cattle, Isa_40:16. Whatever we honour 

God with, it falls infinitely short of the merit of his perfection; for he is exalted far above all
blessing and praise, all burnt-offerings and sacrifices. 
 
 
5. JAMISON, “
All Lebanon’s forest would not supply fuel enough to burn sacrifices worthy of 
the glory of God (
Isa_66:1; 1Ki_8:27; Psa_50:8-13). 
beasts — which abounded in Lebanon. 
 
 
6. K&D, “
By the side of this vanishing diminutiveness on the part of man as contrasted with 
Jehovah, everything by which man could express his adoration of the exalted One comes 
incomparably short of His exaltation. “And Lebanon is not a sufficiency of burning, nor its
game a sufficiency of burnt3offerings;” i.e., there is not enough wood to sustain the fire, nor a 
sufficient supply of sacrificial animals to be slaughtered, and to ascend in fire. 
י ַG (constr. י ֵG) 
signifies that which suffices (and then that which is plentiful); it differs therefore from τ?3δέον, 
what is requisite.  
(Note: The derivation of י ַG is still more obscure than that of δε?, which signifies, according 
to Benfey (Wurzelwörterbuch, ii. 205), “there needs;” according to Sonne, “it binds, scil. 63?
νάγκη.”) 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “17.All nations. He repeats what he had said, that it is in the power and at the disposal of
God to destroy “ nations,” whenever he shall think proper; and that, even while they remain in their
present condition, they are reckoned as nothing before him. But it may be thought absurd for him to say,
that “ nations are nothing,” since God created them, that they might be something. I reply, this is said by
comparison; for the depravity of the human mind is such that it obscures the divine majesty, and places
above it those things which ought to have been subject to God; and, therefore, when we come to that
contest, we may boldly declare that everything that is compared with God is worthless. Nor does Isaiah
speak merely about the nature of men, such as it was created by God; but his aim is to abase and
restrain their pride, when they venture to exalt themselves against God. We know that we cannot subsist
but in God, in whom alone, as Paul declares, “ live, and move, and are.” (Act_17:28.) Nothing is more
vain than man; and, as David says,

“ he be laid in the balance with vanity, he will be found to be even lighter than vanity.” (Psa_62:9.)

In the same manner does Isaiah affirm that “ nations” are not only “” but “ than nothing.” in order to exhibit
more fully their feebleness and vanity. (116)



(116) The ambiguous use of the word “” and of the corresponding term in the Latin language, “vanitas,” is

avoided by our author’ version; “ in comparison of him they are reckoned less than nothing, and what is
not.” — Ed.  
 
17 Before him all the nations are as nothing; 
    they are regarded by him as worthless 
    and less than nothing. 
 
1.BARNES, “Are as nothing - This expresses literally what had been expressed by the 
beautiful and striking imagery above. 
Less than nothing - A strong hyperbolic expression denoting the utter insignificance of the 
nations as compared with God. Such expressions are common in the Scriptures. 
And vanity - Hebrew, 
והת  Sktxut - ‘Emptiness;’ the word which in Gen_1:2 is rendered 
‘without form.’ 
 
 
2. GILL, “
All nations before him are as nothing,.... As if they were nonentities, and were 
not real beings in comparison of him, who is the Being of beings, the author of all beings which 
exist in all nations; who are all in his sight, and are not only as grasshoppers, as is after 
mentioned, but even as nothing: 
 
 
and they are counted to him as less than nothing, and vanity; if there is or could be 
such a thing less than nothing, that they are; and so they are accounted of by him; they are like 
the chaos out of which the earth was formed, when it was "tohu" and "bohu", the first of which 
words is used here; this serves to humble the pride of men, and to lessen the glory of the 
nations, and the inhabitants of them. 
 
3. HENRY, “
The nations of the world are nothing in comparison of him, 
Isa_40:15, Isa_40:17. 
Take them all together, all the great and mighty nations of the earth, kings the most pompous, 
kingdoms the most populous, both the most wealthy; take the isles, the multitude of them, the 
isles of the Gentiles: Before him, when they stand in competition with him or in opposition to 
him, they are as a drop of the bucket compared with the vast ocean, or the small dust of the
balance (which does not serve to turn it, and therefore is not regarded, it is so small) in 
comparison with all the dust of the earth. He takes them up, and throws them away from him, as
a very little thing, not worth speaking of. They are all in his eye as nothing, as if they had no 
being at all; for they add nothing to his perfection and all-sufficiency. They are counted by him, 
and are to be counted by us in comparison of him, less than nothing, and vanity. When he 

pleases, he can as easily bring them all into nothing as at first he brought them out of nothing. 
When God has work to do he values not either the assistance or the resistance of any creature. 
They are all vanity; the word that is used for the chaos (Gen_1:2), to which they will at last be 
reduced. Let this beget in us high thoughts of God and low thoughts of this world, and engage us 
to make God, and not man, both our fear and our hope. This magnifies God's love to the world, 
that, though it is of such small account and value with him, yet, for the redemption of it, he gave
his only3begotten Son, Joh_3:16. 
IV. The services of the church can make no addition to him nor do they bear any proportion to 
his infinite perfections (Isa_40:16): Lebanon is not sufficient to burn; not the wood of it, to be 
for the fuel of the altar, though it be so well stocked with cedars; not the beasts of it, to be for 
sacrifices, though it be so well stocked with cattle, Isa_40:16. Whatever we honour God with, it 
falls infinitely short of the merit of his perfection; for he is exalted far above all blessing and
praise, all burnt-offerings and sacrifices. 
 
 
4. JAMISON, “
(
Psa_62:9; Dan_4:35). 
less than nothing — Maurer translates, as in Isa_41:24, “of nothing” (partitively; or 
expressive of the nature of a thing), a mere nothing. 
vanity — emptiness. 
 
 
5. K&D, “
From the obverse of the thought in 
Isa_40:15 the prophet returns to the thought 
itself, and dwells upon it still further. “All the nations are as nothing before Him; they are
regarded by Him as belonging to nullity and emptiness.” 
'Ephes is the end at which a thing 
ceases, and in an absolute sense that at which all being ceases, hence non-existence or nullity. 
Tohu (from S tx tx, related to Hx t) tx; vid., Comm. on Job, at 
Job_37:6), a horrible desolation, like 
the chaos of creation, where there is nothing definite, and therefore as good as nothing at all; 
min is hardly comparative in the sense of “more nothing than nothing itself” (Like Job_11:17, 
where “brighter” is to be supplied, or Mic_7:4, where “sharper” is similarly required), but is 
used in the same partitive sense as in Isa_41:24 (cf., Isa_44:11 and Psa_62:10). 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “17.All nations. He repeats what he had said, that it is in the power and at the disposal of
God to destroy “ nations,” whenever he shall think proper; and that, even while they remain in their
present condition, they are reckoned as nothing before him. But it may be thought absurd for him to say,
that “ nations are nothing,” since God created them, that they might be something. I reply, this is said by
comparison; for the depravity of the human mind is such that it obscures the divine majesty, and places
above it those things which ought to have been subject to God; and, therefore, when we come to that
contest, we may boldly declare that everything that is compared with God is worthless. Nor does Isaiah
speak merely about the nature of men, such as it was created by God; but his aim is to abase and
restrain their pride, when they venture to exalt themselves against God. We know that we cannot subsist
but in God, in whom alone, as Paul declares, “ live, and move, and are.” (Act_17:28.) Nothing is more
vain than man; and, as David says,

“ he be laid in the balance with vanity, he will be found to be even lighter than vanity.” (Psa_62:9.)

In the same manner does Isaiah affirm that “ nations” are not only “” but “ than nothing.” in order to exhibit
more fully their feebleness and vanity. (116)



(116) The ambiguous use of the word “” and of the corresponding term in the Latin language, “vanitas,” is
avoided by our author’ version; “ in comparison of him they are reckoned less than nothing, and what is
not.” — Ed.  
 
 
18 With whom, then, will you compare God? 
    To what image will you liken him? 
 
1.BARNES, “To whom then will ye liken God? - Since he is so great, what can resemble 
him? What form can be made like him? The main idea here intended to be conveyed by the 
prophet evidently is, that God is great and glorious, and worthy of the confidence of his people. 
This idea he illustrates by a reference to the attempts which had been made to make a 
representation of him, and by showing how vain those efforts were. He therefore states the 
mode in which the images of idols were usually formed, and shows how absurd it was to suppose 
that they could be any real representation of the true God. It is possible that this was composed 
in the time of Manasseh, when idolatry prevailed to a great extent in Judah, and that the 
prophet intended in this manner incidentally to show the folly and absurdity of it. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
To whom then will ye liken God?.... There is nothing in the whole creation that 
can bear any resemblance to him, or he to them; since all nations are as a drop of the bucket, as 
the small dust of the balance, as nothing, yea, less than nothing, and vanity: "or what likeness 
will ye compare unto him", 
(w) order, ordain, and appoint for him? in what rank can he be 
placed? to what class of beings can he be likened? what similitude can be given of him? what is 
there that is fit to be named with him, or compared to him? this, with what follows, is mentioned 
as an antidote to prevent the Jews falling into idolatry in Babylon, where they would be exposed 
unto it; or rather to prevent Christians in Gospel times from going into the idolatry of the 
Papists; see Act_17:28.  
 

3. HENRY, “The prophet here reproves those, 1. Who represented God by creatures, and so 
changed his truth into a lie and his glory into shame, who made images and then said that they 
resembled God, and paid their homage to them accordingly. 2. Who put creatures in the place of 
God, who feared them more than God, as if they were a match for him, or loved them more than 
God, as if they were fit to be rivals with him. Twice the challenge is here made, To whom will
you liken God? Isa_40:18, and again Isa_40:25. The Holy One himself says, To whom will you
liken me? This shows the folly and absurdity, (1.) Of corporal idolatry, making visible images of 
him who is invisible, imagining the image to be animated by the deity, and the deity to be 
presentiated by the image, which, as it was an instance of the corruption of the human nature, so 
it was an intolerable injury to the honour of the divine nature. (2.) Of spiritual idolatry, making 
creatures equal with God in our affections. Proud people make themselves equal with God; 
covetous people make their money equal with God; and whatever we esteem or love, fear or 
hope in, more than God, that creature we equal with God, which is the highest affront 
imaginable to him who is God over all. Now, to show the absurdity of this,
 
4. JAMISON, “
Which of the heathen idols, then, is to be compared to this Almighty God? This 
passage, if not written (as Barnes thinks) so late as the idolatrous times of Manasseh, has at least 
a prospective warning reference to them and subsequent reigns; the result of the chastisement of 
Jewish idolatry in the Babylonish captivity was that thenceforth after the restoration the Jews 
never fell into it. Perhaps these prophecies here may have tended to that result (see 
2Ki_23:26, 
2Ki_23:27). 
 
 
5. K&D, “
The conclusion drawn from 
Isa_40:17, that Jehovah is therefore the matchless Being, 
shapes itself into a question, which is addressed not to idolaters, but to such of the Israelites as 
needed to be armed against the seductive power of idolatry, to which the majority of mankind 
had yielded. “And to whom can ye liken God, and what kind of image can ye place beside Him!” 
The 3ְו before ל ֶאְו is conclusive, as in Isa_28:26, and the futures are modi potent.: with what can 
ye bring into comparison (ל ֶא as in Isa_14:10) El, i.e., God, the one Being who is absolutely the 
Mighty? and what kind of d
e
muth (i.e., divine, like Himself) can ye place by His side? 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “18.To whom then have ye likened God? The Jews were in great danger from another
temptation; for there was reason to believe that the Assyrians and Babylonians would not have obtained
so many victories without their assistance; and hence they might naturally conclude, “ what avail is it to us
to have a peculiar manner of worshipping God which differs from other nations; for our enemies fight
under the favor and protection of heaven, while we are not cheered by any assistance from the God
whom we worship?” Neither can there be any doubt, that the captives were taunted by unbelievers, as is
evident from other passages. (Psa_137:3;Lam_2:15.) That true religion may not be ruined among the
Jews on account of the calamity which they had sustained, God rises up, and proclaims that a grievous
injury is done to him, if believers, discouraged by adversity, turn aside to the idols and superstitions of the
Gentiles. Thus he confirms them in the faith of the promises, that they may not sink under the weight of
the punishments which they endure.

The Prophet, as we formerly suggested, does not address merely the men of his own age, but posterity,
who would have a still severer contest with the mockeries of the nations whose captives they were, and
likewise with bad examples and customs; for when, in consequence of being mingled with heathen
nations, they daily beheld many corruptions of piety, it was more difficult for them steadily to persevere.
That they might not entertain any foolish notion that high prosperity attended the worshippers of false
gods, the Prophet meets this error, and reminds them that God, whom they and their fathers worshipped,
ought not to be compared with the gods of the Gentiles; for these were made by men, and were
composed of gold or silver, wood or stone; but God created all things; and therefore that the highest injury
is done to God, not only by comparing his majesty with things of no value, but even by not, placing him far
above all the angels and everything that is reckoned divine.

When Paul employs this passage (Act_17:29) as a proof against idolaters, or at least quotes the words of
the Prophet, he does not wrest them from their true meaning. He infers, indeed, from them that to frame
any image of God is exceedingly wicked, while the Prophet, in guarding the Jews against distrust, at the
same time condemns the superstitions of the Gentiles, and declares that it is inconsistent with the nature
of God to be represented by painting or by any kind of likeness. This shews clearly that Paul’ doctrine
fully agrees with it; for the Prophet, after having shewn that the power of God is infinite, since he holds all
things in his fist, at length concludes, “ whom then will ye liken me? for no image that is formed will have
any likeness or resemblance to me.”

Or, what resemblance will you appoint to him? This is a useful doctrine, and worthy of observation; for
were there nothing more than this single passage, it would be perfectly sufficient for refuting the
inventions by which Papists deceive themselves, when they think that they have a right to represent God
by outward figures. The Prophet declares that it is impossible to frame out of dead matter an image which
shall have any resemblance to the glory of God. He openly rejects idols, and does not even speak of the
worship of them, but affirms that to manufacture and set them up before God is wicked and abominable.
The Scripture is full of such proofs. Moses warned a people prone to this vice,

“ sawest no image or shape in the mountain, thou only heardest a voice. See then and beware that thou
be not led astray so as to frame for thyself any image.”

(Deu_4:12.)

In order to know God, therefore, we must not frame a likeness of him according to our own fancy, but we
must betake ourselves to the Word, in which his lively image is exhibited to us. Satisfied with that
communication, let us not attempt anything else of our own. Other ways and methods, such as idols and
images, teach us vanity and falsehood, and not truth, as Jeremiah beautifully says, “ wood is the
instruction of vanities,” (Jer_10:8,) and Habakkuk, “ graven image is falsehood.” (Hab_2:18.) When the
Lord sometimes compares himself to a lion, a bear, a man, or other objects, this has nothing to do with
images, as the Papists imagine, but by those metaphors either the kindness and mercy of God, or his
wroth and displeasure, and other things of the same nature, are expressed; for God cannot reveal himself
to us in any other way than by a comparison with things which we know. In short, if it were lawful to frame
or set up an image of God, that would be a point of resemblance to the gods of the Gentiles, and this
declaration of the Prophet could not be maintained.  
 

 
19 As for an idol, a metalworker casts it, 
    and a goldsmith overlays it with gold 
    and fashions silver chains for it. 
 
1.BARNES, “The workman - The Hebrew word denotes an artificer of any kind, and is 
applied to one who engraved on wood or stone 
Exo_28:2; to a workman in iron, brass, stone, 
wood Exo_35:35; Deu_27:15; or an artisan, or artificer in general. It here refers manifestly to a 
man who worked in the metals of which idols were commonly made. Those idols were 
sometimes made of wood, sometimes of clay, but more frequently, as they are at present in 
India, of metal. It became, undoubtedly, a regular trade or business thus to make idol-gods. 
Melteth - Casts or founds. 
A graven image - (לספ  pesel). This word commonly denotes an image carved or graven from 
wood Exo_20:4; Jdg_17:3; Isa_44:15, Isa_44:17; but it is also frequently applied to a molten 
image, or one that is cast from metals Jer_10:14; Jer_51:17. It is used in this sense here; as there 
is an incongruity in the idea of casting, or melting a graven image. 
And the goldsmith spreadeth it over with gold - Idols were frequently overlaid with 
gold or silver. Those which were in the temples of the gods were probably commonly made in 
this way, and probably those also which were made for private use, as far as it could be afforded. 
The word here rendered ‘goldsmith,’ however, does not of necessity man a worker in gold, but a 
smith in general, or a worker in any kind of metals. 
And casteth silver chains - For the idol. These were not to fasten it, but for the purpose of 
ornament. The general principle seems to have been to decorate their idols with that which was 
regarded as the highest ornament among the people; and as chains were used in abundance as a 
part of their personal ornaments among the Orientals (see the notes at Isa_3:23), so they made 
use of the same kind of ornaments for their idols. The idols of the Hindoos now are lavishly 
decorated in this manner. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
And casteth silver chains “And forgeth for it chains of silver” - For 
ףרוצ  tsoreph, the participle, twenty-seven MSS., five ancient, and three editions, read ףרצ  
tsaraph, pret. third person. 
 
 

3. GILL, “The workman melteth a graven image ,.... Or, "the founder"; he melts some sort 
of metal, as iron, brass, copper, or lead, which he casts into a mould for an image, and 
afterwards graves, or gets it graved:  
 
and the goldsmith spreadeth it over with gold; or, "the finer"; he stretches out plates of 
gold, and covers it with them, so that it looks as if it was made of solid gold, and deceives the 
eyes of men; such stupidity and vanity are there in mortals to believe that there can be deity in 
such a piece of workmanship!  
 
and casteth silver chains to put about the graven image, either for ornament, or rather 
to fasten it to some wall or pillar, that it may stand upright, and may not be taken down and 
stole away, or blown down with the wind, or fall of itself and be broken; thus ridiculing the 
weakness of these idols, and the folly of the makers and worshippers of them. The Targum is,  
 
"the silversmith joins silver chains to it.'' 
 
4. HENRY, “
The prophet describes idols as despicable things and worthy of the greatest 
contempt (
Isa_40:19, Isa_40:20): “Look upon the better sort of them, which rich people set up, 
and worship; they are made of some base metal, cast into what shape the founder pleases, and 
that is gilded, or overlaid with plates of gold, that it may pass for a golden image. It is a creature; 
for the workman made it; therefore it is not God, Hos_8:6. It depended upon his will whether it 
should be a god at all, and of what shape it should be. It is a cheat; for it is gold on the outside, 
but within it is lead or copper, in this indeed representing the deities, that they were not what 
they seemed to be, and deceived their admirers. How despicable then are the worst sort of them 
- the poor men's gods! He that is so impoverished that he has scarcely a sacrifice to offer to his 
god when he has made him will yet not be without an enshrined deity of his own; and, though he 
cannot procure one of brass or stone, he will have a wooden one rather than none, and for that 
purpose chooses a tree that will not soon rot, and of that he will have his graven image made. 
Both agree to have their image well fastened, that they may not be robbed of it. The better sort 
have silver chains to fix theirs with; and, though it be but a wooden image, care is taken that it 
shall not be moved.” Let us pause a little and see, 1. How these idolaters shame themselves, and 
what a reproach they put upon their own reason, in dreaming that gods of their own making 
(Nehushtans, pieces of brass or logs of wood) should be able to do them any kindness. Thus vain 
were they in their imaginations; and how was their foolish heart darkened! 2. See how these 
idolaters shame us, who worship the only living and true God. They spared no cost upon their 
idols; we grudge that as waste which is spent in the service of our God. They took care that their 
idols should not be moved; we wilfully provoke our God to depart from us. 
II. He describes God as infinitely great, and worthy of the highest veneration; so that between 
him and idols, whatever competition there may be, there is no comparison. To prove the 
greatness of God he appeals, 
 
5. JAMISON, “
graven — rather, an image in general; for it is incongruous to say “melteth” 
(that is, casts out of metal) a graven image (that is, one of carved wood); so 
Jer_10:14, “molten 
image.” 
spreadeth it over — (See on Isa_30:22). 
chains — an ornament lavishly worn by rich Orientals (Isa_3:18, Isa_3:19), and so 
transferred to their idols. Egyptian relics show that idols were suspended in houses by chains. 
 

 
6. K&D, “
Least of all can an idol bear comparison with Him. “The idol, when the smith has
cast it, the melter plates it with gold, and melteth silver chains for it.” The object (
happesel, the 
idol), which is here placed first as the theme in the accusative (lit. the image hewn out), denotes 
in this instance an idol generally. 
שׁ ָר ָח is as comprehensive as faber. ב ָהָ? ַE ע ֵ? ִר signifies here to 
cover over with a ב ָהָז 3ַע ֻ? ִר (. oOs t5 u_O), the verb being used in a denominative sense, and not in its 
primary meaning. As we must assume, according to Isa_40:20, that the prophet intends to carry 
us into the midst of the process of manufacturing the idol, the paratactic expression is to be 
pointed as above, viz., “after the (a) smith has cast it (compare Arab. 
nasik, a piece of cast metal), 
the (a) melter (goldsmith) covers it with gold plate;” and 
tsoreph, which is palindromically 
repeated, according to Isaiah's custom, is not the third pers. poel (on the poel of strong stems, 
see at 
Job_9:15 and Psa_109:10), but a participle, equivalent to אוּה ף ֵרוֹצ (as in Isa_29:8, which 
see; and also, according to the accents, Isa_33:5), “and he melteth chains of silver,” viz., to 
fasten the image. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “19.The carver prepares a graven image. As public opinion has great force, and
everything that pleases the multitude passes for a law, the Prophet fortifies believers against this error.
These words therefore convey an anticipation, that the Jews may not be terrified when they see the
Gentiles laboring with all their might to make idols, for in this way they deceive and ensnare each other.
But he attacks the madness of the whole world, (117) on this ground, that all are impelled by such
outrageous zeal to the practice of superstition, and every man is his own instructor in the formation of
idols.



(117) “Il s’ d’ saincte colere alencontre de la folie desesperee des hommes.” “ rises in holy wrath against
the desperate folly of men.” 
 
 
20 A person too poor to present such an offering 
    selects wood that will not rot; 
they look for a skilled worker 

    to set up an idol that will not topple. 
 
1.BARNES, “He that is so impoverished - So poor. So it is generally supposed that the 
word used here is to be understood, though interpreters have not been entirely agreed in regard 
to its signification. The Septuagint renders the phrase, ‘The carpenter chooseth a sound piece of 
wood.’ The Chaldee. ‘He cuts down an ash, a tree which will not rot.’ Vulgate, ‘Perhaps he 
chooses a tree which is incorruptible.’ Jarchi renders it, ‘He who is accustomed to examine, and 
to judge between the wood which is durable, and other wood.’ But the signification of the word 
(from 
ןכס  H tK s, “to dwell, to be familiar with anyone”) given to it by our translators, is probably 
the correct one, that of being too poor to make a costly oblation. This notion of poverty, 
Gesenius supposes, is derived from the notion of being seated; and thence of sinking down from 
languor or debility; and hence, from poverty or want. 
That he hath no oblation - No offering; no sacrifice; no rich gift. He is too poor to make 
such an offering to his god as would be implied in an idol of brass or other metal, richly overlaid 
with plates of gold, and decorated with silver chains. In Isa_40:19, the design seems to have 
been to describe the more rich and costly idols that were made; in this, to describe those that 
were made by the poor who were unable to offer such as were made of brass and gold. The word 
‘oblation,’ therefore, that is, offering, in this place, does not denote an offering made to the true 
God, but an offering made to an idol, such as an image was regarded to be. He could not afford a 
rich offering, and was constrained to make one of wood. 
Chooseth a tree that will not rot - Wood that will be durable and permanent. Perhaps the 
idea is, that as he could not afford one of metal, he would choose that which would be the most 
valuable which he could make - a piece of wood that was durable, and that would thus show his 
regard for the god that he worshipped. Or possibly the sense may be, that he designed it should 
not be moved; that he expressed a fixed and settled determination to adhere to the worship of 
the idol; and that as he had no idea of changing his religion, the permanency and durability of 
the wood would be regarded as a somewhat more acceptable expression of his worship. 
A cunning workman - Hebrew, ‘A wise artificer;’ a man skilled in the art of carving, and of 
making images. 
A graven image - An image engraved or cut from wood, in contradistinction from one that is 
molten or made from metals. 
That shall not be moved - That shall stand long, as the expression of his devotion to the 
service of the idol. The wood that was commonly employed for this purpose as being most 
durable, as we learn from Isa_44:14, was the cedar, the cypress, or the oak (see the note in that 
place). The phrase, ‘shall not be moved,’ does not refer so much to its being fixed in one place, as 
to its durability and permanency. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
Chooseth a tree that will not rot - For what? To make a god out of it! The 
rich we find made theirs of gold and silver; the poor man was obliged to put up with a wooden 
god! From the words “he that hath no oblation chooseth a tree,” we may learn that the gold and 
silver necessary to make the graven image was first dedicated, and then formed into a god! How 
stupid is idolatry! Strange that these people did not perceive that there could be no help in these 
molten and wooden idols! 

 
 
3. GILL, “
He that is so impoverished that he hath no oblation,.... Who is so poor that 
he cannot bring an offering to his God, yet he will have one; and though he cannot purchase a 
golden or silver one, or one that is gilt, and adorned with either; yet he will have a wooden one, 
as follows. Some render it, "he that is set over the oblation", which Aben Ezra mentions; that 
was over the treasury, where the oblations were; the Heathen priest, whose business it was from 
thence to procure idols to worship. Jerom takes the word 
ןכסמ to be the name of a tree that will 
not rot; and so the Targum renders it,  
 
"he cuts down an ash:''  
 
but the word is descriptive of an idol worshipper; and, according to Gussetius (x), signifies one 
that by custom and repeated acts has got skill in such things; and so Jarchi: hence  
 
he chooseth a tree that will not rot: he goes to the forest, and chooses the best tree for his 
purpose he can find, even one that will not rot, as the cypress; and though he cannot get an idol 
made of metal, but is forced to have one of wood, yet he will get the best he can, that will last 
longest, an incorruptible deity, as he fancies:  
 
he seeketh unto him a cunning workman, to prepare a  graven image that shall not 
be moved: having decided upon his tree, and what sort of wood to make his god of, he looks 
out for an ingenious carpenter and carver, a good workman, to make it in the form of an image, 
and grave, or rather carve it, in the best manner he can, and then fasten it in a proper place, that 
it may not fall; a poor helpless deity, that cannot secure itself, and much less be of any service to 
its worshippers.  
 
 
4. JAMISON, “
impoverished — literally, “sunk” in circumstances.  
no oblation — he who cannot afford to overlay his idol with gold and silver (
Isa_40:19). 
tree ... not rot — the cedar, cypress, oak, or ash (Isa_44:14). 
graven — of wood; not a molten one of metal. 
not be moved — that shall be durable. 
 
 
5. K&D, “
This is the origin of a metal idol. The wooden idol is described in 
Isa_40:20 : “The
man who is impoverished in oblations, he chooseth a block of wood that will not rot; he seeketh
for himself a skilful smith, to prepare an idol that will not shake.” He who has fallen into such 
poverty that he can only offer to his God a poor oblation (
t
e
_umo tx, accusative, according to 
Ewald, §284, c), has an idol cut for himself out of a block of wood. That 
H tKx s (Arab. sakana or 
sakuna) 
(Note: Both forms occur in this sense, according to the evidence of original sources, with 
the common imperative 
yaskunu, the infinitive sukune passed over by Freytag, the verbal 

substantive maskane, and the adjective miskin or meskin, primarily to be forced to inactivity 
through weakness, destitution, or outward influences, not to be able to move and exert one's 
self; or, more particularly, not to be able to defend one's self (as it were to be obliged to sit 
still or keep still). Hence more especially opibus et facultatibus carens, being in distress, 
destitute, poor.) 
is an ancient word, is evident from Deu_8:9. The verb yimmot, like yittol in Isa_40:15, is a fut. 
niphal, to be made to shake. A wooden image, which is planed at the bottom, and made heavier 
below than above, to prevent its falling over with every shock, is to be a god! The thing carries its 
own satire, even when described with the greatest seriousness. 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “20.The poor chooseth for his offering wood that will not rot. He concludes that no class of
men is free from that crime, that the rich and poor alike are guilty and condemned; for the rich make their
gods of gold or silver, and the poor of wood which they had selected. Hence he shews that all men are
carried away by strange madness, and that even though they have not the means, still they desire to
have something excellent for the worship of their gods. Men wish to enjoy the presence of God, and this
is the beginning and source of idolatry; for God is not present with us by an idol, but by his word and by
the power of his Spirit; and although he holds out to us in the sacraments an image both of his grace and
of spiritual blessings, yet this is done with no other intention than to lead us upwards to himself. Yet the
Prophet censures the folly of men, who are so blind as to labor with excessive industry and ingenuity in
highly adorning their idols.  
 
 
21 Do you not know? 
    Have you not heard? 
Has it not been told you from the beginning? 
    Have you not understood since the earth was 
founded? 
 
1.BARNES, “Have ye not known? - This is evidently an address to the worshippers of 
idols, and either designed to be addressed to the Jews themselves in the times of Manasseh, 
when idolatry abounded, or to all idolaters. The prophet had in the previous verses shown the 

manner in which the idols were made, and the folly of regarding them as objects of worship. He 
now turns and addresses the worshippers of these idols, as being without excuse. They might 
have known that these were not the true God. They had had abundant opportunity of learning 
his existence and of becoming acquainted with his majesty and glory. Tradition had informed 
them of this, and the creation of the earth demonstrated his greatness and power. The prophet, 
therefore, asks them whether they had not known this? Whether their conduct was the result of 
ignorance? And the question implies emphatically that they had known, or had abundant 
opportunity to know of the existence and majesty of God. This was emphatically true of the 
Jews, and yet they were constantly falling into idolatrous worship. 
From the beginning - Hebrew, ‘From the head,’ that is, from the very commencement of 
the world. Has it not been communicated by tradition, from age to age, that there is one God, 
and that he is the Creator and upholder of all things? This was particularly the case with the 
Jews, who had had this knowledge from the very commencement of their history, and they were, 
therefore, entirely without excuse in their tendencies to idolatry. 
From the foundations of the earth - Have you not learned the existence and greatness of 
God from the fact that the world has been made, and that it demonstrates the existence and 
perfection of God? The sacred writers often speak of the earth as resting on a foundation, as 
upheld, etc.: 
For he hath founded it upon the seas, 
And established it upon the floods. 
(Psa_24:2; see also Pro_8:29) Perhaps here, however, the word ‘foundation’ refers rather to 
the time than to the manner in which the earth is made, and corresponds to the phrase ‘from the 
beginning;’ and the sense may be, ‘Has it not been understood ever since the earth was founded? 
Has not the tradition of the existence and perfections of God been unbroken and constant?’ The 
argument is, that the existence and greatness of God were fully known by tradition and by his 
works; and that it was absurd to attempt to form an image of that God who had laid the 
foundations of the world. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
Have ye not known - On this verse Kimchi has a very interesting comment, 
an extract of which I subjoin. “The whole world may be considered as a house built up; heaven 
its roof; the stars its lamps; and the fruits of the earth its table spread. The Master of the house 
is God, blessed for ever; and man is the steward into whose hand all the business of the house is 
given. If he always consider in his heart that the Master of the house is continually over him, and 
that he keeps his eye upon his work, and if in consequence he acts wisely, he shall find favor in 
the eyes of the Master of the house. But if he find wickedness in the house, then will he remove 
him 
ןמ3ותדיקפ  min3pekidutho, ‘from his stewardship.’ The foolish steward does not think of this; 
for as his eyes do not see the Master of the house, he saith in his heart, ‘I will eat and drink what 
I find in this house, and will take my pleasure in it; nor shall I be careful whether there be a 
master over this house or not.’ When the Lord of the house marks this, he comes and expels him 
from the house speedily, and with great anger; therefore it is said, Isa_40:23, He bringeth the 
princes to nothing.” It seems that this parable had been long in use among the Jews, as our 
blessed Lord alludes to it in his parable of the unjust steward. Or did the rabbin, finding it to his 
purpose, steal the parable from the Gospel? In both places it has great and peculiar beauties. 
Have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth “Have ye not 
understood it from the foundations of the earth?” - The true reading seems to be תודסוממ  

mimmosedoth, to answer to שארמ  merosh in the foregoing line. It follows a word ending with מ  
mem, and out of three mems concurring, it was an easy mistake to drop the middle one. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Have ye not known? This is the speech of the prophet, directed to the idolaters, 
appealing to their own natural knowledge, who, from the light of nature, might know that idols 
were nothing, had no divinity in them: that it is God that made the earth and governs the world, 
and who only ought to be worshipped:  
 
have ye not heard? by tradition from the ancients, from your forefathers, who received it from 
theirs, and have delivered it to you:  
 
hath it not been told you from the beginning? from the beginning of your states and 
kingdoms, and even from the beginning of the world, by the wisest and best of men that have 
been in it, that those things are true before related, and what follow:  
 
have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth? the being of God, the 
invisible things of him, his eternal power and Godhead, from the things that are made, even 
from his founding of the earth; as well as such knowledge and understanding has been as early 
as that, and might be continued from it: or,  
 
have ye not understood the foundations of the earth 
(y)? what the earth is founded 
upon, and who laid the foundations of it; no other than that divine Being described in the next 
words.  
 
4. HENRY, “
To what they had heard of him by the hearing of the ear, and the consent of all 
ages and nations concerning him (
Isa_40:21): “Have you not known by the very light of nature? 
Has it not been told you by your fathers and teachers, according to the constant tradition 
received from their ancestors and predecessors, even from the beginning?” (Those notices of 
God are as ancient as the world.) “Have you not understood it as always acknowledged from the
foundation of the earth, that God is a great God, and a great King above all gods?” It has been a 
truth universally admitted that there is an infinite Being who is the fountain of all being. This is 
understood not only ever since the beginning of the world, but from and by the origin of the 
universe. It is founded upon the foundation of the earth. The invisible things of God are clearly
seen from the creation of the world, Rom_1:20. Thou mayest not only ask thy father, and he 
shall tell thee this, and thy elders (Deu_32:7); but ask those that go by the way (Job_21:29), ask 
the first man you meet, and he will say the same. Some read it, Will you not know? Will you not
hear it? For those that are ignorant of this are willingly ignorant; the light shines in their faces, 
but they shut their eyes against it. Now that which is here said of God is, (1.) That he has the 
command of all the creatures. The heaven and the earth themselves are under his management: 
He sits upon the circle, or globe, of the earth, Isa_40:22. He that has the special residence of his 
glory in the upper world maintains a dominion over this lower world, gives law to it, and directs 
all the motions of it to his own glory. He sits undisturbed upon the earth, and so establishes it. 
He is still stretching out the heavens, his power and providence keep them still stretched out, 
and will do so till the day comes that they shall be rolled together like a scroll. He spreads them 

out as easily as we draw a curtain to and fro, opening these curtains in the morning and drawing 
them close again at night. And the heaven is to this earth as a tent to dwell in; it is a canopy 
drawn over our heads, et quod tegit omnia coelum - and it encircles all. - Ovid. See Psa_104:2. 
(2.) That the children of men, even the greatest and mightiest, are as nothing before him. The 
numerous inhabitants of this earth are in his eye as grasshoppers in ours, so little and 
inconsiderable, of such small value, of such little use, and so easily crushed. Proud men's lifting 
up themselves is but like the grasshopper's leap; in an instant they must stoop down to the earth 
again. If the spies thought themselves grasshoppers before the sons of Anak (Num_13:33), what 
are we before the great God? Grasshoppers live but awhile, and live carelessly, not like the ant; 
so do the most of men.
 
5. JAMISON, “
ye — who worship idols. The question emphatically implies, they had known. 
from the beginning — (
Isa_41:4, Isa_41:26; Isa_48:16). God is the beginning (Rev_1:8). 
The tradition handed down from the very first, of the creation of all things by God at the 
beginning, ought to convince you of His omnipotence and of the folly of idolatry. 
 
 
6. K&D, “
Having thus depicted in a few strokes the infatuation of idolatry, the prophet 
addresses the following question to such of the Israelites as are looking at it with longing eye, 
even if they have not already been deluded by it. “Do ye not know? Do ye not hear? Is it not
proclaimed to you from the beginning? Have ye not obtained an insight into the foundations of
the earth?” We have here four questions chiastically arranged. The absolute being of God, which 
is above all created things, is something which may be either inferred per ratiocinationem, or 
learned per traditionem. When Israel failed to acknowledge the absolute distinctness and 
unequalled supremacy of Jehovah its God, it hardened itself against the knowledge which it 
might acquire even in a natural way (cf., 
Psa_19:1-14 and Rom_1:20), and shut its ears against 
the teaching of revelation and tradition, which had come down from the very beginning of its 
history. The first two questions are construed with futures, the other two with perfects; the 
former refer to what is possible, the latter to what is an actual fact. Have you - this is the 
meaning of the four questions - have you obtained no knowledge of the foundations of the earth, 
namely, as to the way in which they were laid? 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “21.Do ye not know? After having ridiculed the stupidity and madness of the Gentiles, the
Prophet turns to the Jews; for we are all prone to superstition, and thus we easily fall into it when any
example is placed before our eyes. In consequence of mixing with the Babylonians during their captivity,
the Jews were constrained to behold daily the basest examples of idolatry, and might be led away to
wicked imitation. Isaiah therefore anticipates this at an early period, and warns them not to be carried
away by the sight of such things.

He asks, “ they not been taught, and have they not learned who is God?” The greater part of
commentators think that all the questions here put are a repetition of the same truth, namely, that the
creation of the world shews clearly that nothing can be more inconsistent than to seek God in wood and
stone, silver and gold. But we may infer from the context that there are two clauses. Had he proceeded in
his expostulation with the Gentiles, he would have brought forward no other witnesses than heaven and
earth. But because he addresses the Jews who had been plainly taught by the Law, he brings forward

direct arguments to refute them, drawn both from the order of nature and from the voice of God. And, first,
he puts the question in general terms, “ ye not know?” Next, he adds two methods by which they ought to
have distinguished between the true God and the false gods. The former is drawn from the hearing of the
Word, and therefore he expressly says, “ it not been told you? Have ye not heard?”

The latter method is borrowed from that magnificent theatre (118) in which the glory of God shines above
and below. If the discourse had been addressed to foreigners and heathens, he would have been
satisfied with this second demonstration, as we see that Paul also was; for, having to do with the
inhabitants of Lystra, to whom no knowledge of heavenly doctrine had been conveyed, he employs none
but natural arguments, that “ by giving rain and sunshine, did not leave himself ( ἀbάρτυρον) without
witness.” (Act_14:17.) But when the Prophet spoke to the Jews about true godliness, it would have been
improper for him to pass by the Law, which rendered them doubly inexcusable if, by neglecting it, they
profaned themselves with unbelievers; for they had been convinced not only by the sight of their eyes, but
also by the hearing of their cars, which God beat incessantly by the preaching of his Law. Since,
therefore, from their mother’ womb they had sucked along with the milk the true knowledge of God, and
had been taught by their fathers through a long succession of generations, the Prophet justly argues that
they will be exceedingly ungrateful and wicked, if such assistance produce no good effect upon them.

Hath it not been told you from the beginning? The phrase, from the beginning, or “ ago,” conveys the idea
that not only had they been educated from childhood in the pure worship of God, but during a succession
of ages there had been largely enjoyed by that nation a doctrine which would not suffer them to go astray,
provided that they were attentive; as if he had said, “ have not any new God, but the same God who
revealed himself from the beginning to Abraham, Moses, and the rest of the fathers.” And indeed it yields
no small confirmation, that the doctrine which had been continued among believers during so many ages
must have been ancient. Not that antiquity alone is sufficient for establishing the certainty of faith, (for, on
the contrary, the Gentiles might easily have objected, that their superstitions were not less ancient,) but
since “ the beginning” the authority of the Law had been abundantly ratified, and God had testified that it
came from him, long experience added no small confirmation, when they knew that their ancestors had
delivered to posterity a form of religion which they could not throw away without receiving the stamp of
base apostasy. Such a commencement, therefore, and such progress quickly remove all doubt. It is one
and the same faith that has been held by us and by our fathers, for they and we have acknowledged the
same God, the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. The same word, the same promises, and the same end,
have been exhibited to all believers.

From the foundations of the earth. This is figurative language, in which a part is taken for the whole; for a
part of the world is put; for the whole world. God has exhibited this world as a mirror to men, that by
beholding it they may acknowledge his majesty, so that it is a lively image of invisible things, as Paul
explains at great length in the first chapter of the Epistle to the Romans. Their ignorance is therefore “
excuse;” for they cannot allege that they do not know God who has revealed himself in so many ways.
(Rom_1:20.) And indeed men sin more through insolence and pride than through ignorance; for they
despise God who manifests himself openly and speaks plainly, and their attention is occupied with
creatures, and with the most trifling matters. Has such contempt any title to be excused? Do they not
deserve to be blinded, and to adore their own inventions instead of God, which we see has happened to
almost all? Such punishment is unquestionably just and due to so great pride. And if to that knowledge
which we obtain through the creatures there be likewise added the doctrine of the word, we are much less
excusable. Isaiah has therefore joined both kinds of knowledge, in order to shew that the Jews ought to
be doubly condemned, if they did not place confidence in God, after having received instruction
concerning his power and goodness.

(118) “De ce beau theater du monde.” “ that beautiful theater of the world.”  
 
 
22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, 
    and its people are like grasshoppers. 
He stretches out the heavens like a canopy, 
    and spreads them out like a tent to live in. 
 
1.BARNES, “It is he that sitteth - Margin, ‘Him that sitteth,’ that is, have you not known 
him? The Hebrew literally means ‘the sitter, or he sitting on the circle of the each;’ and it may be 
connected either with 
Isa_40:21, ‘Have ye not known him sitting on the circle of the earth?’ or 
with Isa_40:18, ‘What likeness will ye compare to him that sitteth on the circle of the earth?’ In 
either case the phrase is designed to show the majesty and glory of God. The word ‘sitteth’ refers 
to God as a sovereign or monarch, making the circle of the earth his throne. 
The circle of the earth - Or rather, “above” (לע  ‛al) the circle of the earth. The word 
rendered ‘circle’ (גוּח  exut[) denotes “a circle, sphere, or arch”; and is applied to the arch or vault 
of the heavens, in Pro_8:27; Job_22:14. The phrase ‘circle,’ or ‘circuit of the earth,’ here seems 
to be used in the same sense as the phrase orbis terrarum by the Latins; not as denoting a 
sphere, or not as implying that the earth was a globe, but that it was an extended plain 
surrounded by oceans and mighty waters. The globular form of the earth was then unknown; 
and the idea is, that God sat above this extended circuit, or circle; and that the vast earth was 
beneath his feet. 
And the inhabitants thereof are like grasshoppers - Or rather, like locusts, for so the 
Hebrew word properly means. This is designed to show that the inhabitants of the earth, 
numerous and mighty as they are, are as nothing compared with God. The idea is that God is so 
exalted, that, as he looks down from that elevated station, all the inhabitants of the world appear 
to him as locusts - a busy, agirated, moving, impatient multitude, spread over the vast circle of 
the earth beneath him - as locusts spread in almost interminable bands over the plains in the 
East. What a striking illustration of the insignificance of man as he is viewed from the heavens! 
What an impressive description of the nothingness of his mighty plans, and of the vanity of his 
mightiest works! 

That stretcheth out the heavens - Referring to the firmament above, as that which seems 
to be stretched out, or expanded over our heads. The heavens above are often thus compared to 
an expanse - either solid Gen_1:7, or to a curtain, or tent (compare the note at Isa_34:4). 
As a curtain - The word used here (קד  doq) denotes properly fineness, thinness; and then a 
fine or thin cloth, or curtain. Here it means a thin canopy that is stretched over us. The same 
expression occurs in Psa_104:2 (compare Job_9:8; Isa_44:24). Probably the reference here is 
to the veil, curtain, or awning which the Orientals are accustomed to draw over the court in their 
houses. Their houses are constructed with an open court in the center, with the rooms ranged 
round it. In that court or open square there are usually fountains, if the situation is so that they 
can be constructed; and they are cool and refreshing places for the family to sit in the heat of the 
summer. In hot or rainy weather, a curtain or awning is drawn over this area. According to the 
imago of the prophet here, the heavens are spread out over our heads as such an awning. 
And spreadeth them out as a tent - As a tent that is made for a habitation. Perhaps the 
idea is, that the heavens are extended like a tent in order to furnish a dwelling-place for God. 
Thus the Chaldee renders it. If so, it proves that the universe, so vast, was suited up to be the 
dwelling-place of the High and Holy One, and is a most impressive representation of his 
immensity. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
As a curtain “As a thin veil” - “It is usual in the summer season, and upon 
all occasions when a large company is to be received, to have the court sheltered from heat or 
inclemency of the weather by a velum, umbrella, or veil, as I shall call it; which being expanded 
on ropes from one side of the parapet wall to the other, may be folded or unfolded at pleasure. 
The psalmist seems to allude to some covering of this kind in that beautiful expression of 
spreading out the heavens like a curtain.” - Shaw’s Travels, p. 274. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth,.... Or, "the globe 
(z)" of it; for 
the earth is spherical or globular: not a flat plain, but round, hung as a ball in the air; here 
Jehovah sits as the Lord and Sovereign; being the Maker of it, he is above it, orders and directs 
its motion, and governs all things in it: Kimchi rightly observes, that the heavens are the circle of 
the earth, which is the centre of them, and around which they are; and so it signifies, that the 
Lord sits or dwells in the heavens, from whence he beholds the children of men:  
 
and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; or "locusts (a)"; as one upon a very 
great eminence looking down beholds creatures as exceeding small and little; and if the 
Israelites were to the "anakim" or giants as grasshoppers, Num_13:33, much more must puny 
mortals be such in the sight of God, and in comparison of him; and this may denote, not only the 
minuteness of men, but what weak, impotent, useless, worthless, and short lived creatures men 
are:  
 
that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain; alluding to the firmament or expanse made 
at the creation, and still continued; which is as a curtain to himself, which he draws around 
himself, he dwelling in the highest heavens, and in light inaccessible to mortals; and which he 
stretches out as a canopy around this earth, for the use of the inhabitants of it: or, "as a little 
thing"; or, as a little skin (b); and which he stretches out as easily as a man can stretch out that:  
 

and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in it; for himself to dwell in, and so stretches 
out the heavens like curtains about him; tents being made of such, and often of skins.  
 
4. HENRY, “
That he has the command of all the creatures. The heaven and the earth 
themselves are under his management: He sits upon the circle, or globe, of the earth, 
Isa_40:22. 
He that has the special residence of his glory in the upper world maintains a dominion over this 
lower world, gives law to it, and directs all the motions of it to his own glory. He sits undisturbed 
upon the earth, and so establishes it. He is still stretching out the heavens, his power and 
providence keep them still stretched out, and will do so till the day comes that they shall be 
rolled together like a scroll. He spreads them out as easily as we draw a curtain to and fro, 
opening these curtains in the morning and drawing them close again at night. And the heaven is 
to this earth as a tent to dwell in; it is a canopy drawn over our heads, et quod tegit omnia
coelum - and it encircles all. - Ovid. See Psa_104:2. (2.) That the children of men, even the 
greatest and mightiest, are as nothing before him. The numerous inhabitants of this earth are in 
his eye as grasshoppers in ours, so little and inconsiderable, of such small value, of such little 
use, and so easily crushed. Proud men's lifting up themselves is but like the grasshopper's leap; 
in an instant they must stoop down to the earth again. If the spies thought themselves 
grasshoppers before the sons of Anak (Num_13:33), what are we before the great God? 
Grasshoppers live but awhile, and live carelessly, not like the ant; so do the most of men. (3.) 
That those who appear and act against him, how formidable soever they may be to their fellow-
creatures, will certainly be humble and brought down by the mighty hand of God, Isa_40:23, 
Isa_40:24. Princes and judges, who have great authority, and abuse it to the support of 
oppression and injustice, make nothing of those about them; as for all their enemies they puff at
them (Psa_10:5; Psa_12:5); but, when the great God takes them to task, he brings them to 
nothing; he humbles them, and tames them, and makes them as vanity, little regarded, neither 
feared nor loved. He makes them utterly unable to stand before his judgments, which shall 
either, [1.] Prevent their settlement in their authority: They shall not be planted; they shall not
be sown; and those are the two ways of propagating plants, either by seed or slips. Nay, if they 
should gain a little interest, and so be planted or sown, yet their stock shall not take root in the
earth, they shall not continue long in power. Eliphaz saw the foolish taking root, but suddenly
cursed their habitation. And then how soon is the fig-tree withered away! Or, [2.] He will blast 
them when they think they are settled. He does but blow upon them, and then they shall wither, 
and come to nothing, and the whirlwind shall take them away as stubble. For God's wrath, 
though it seem at first to blow slightly upon them, will soon become a mighty whirlwind. When 
God judges he will overcome. Those that will not bow before him cannot stand before him. 
 
5. JAMISON, “
It is he — rather, connected with last verse, “Have ye not known?” - have ye 
not understood Him that sitteth ...? (
Isa_40:26) [Maurer]. 
circle — applicable to the globular form of the earth, above which, and the vault of sky 
around it, He sits. For “upon” translate “above.” 
as grasshoppers — or locusts in His sight (Num_13:33), as He looks down from on high 
(Psa_33:13, Psa_33:14; Psa_113:4-6). 
curtain — referring to the awning which the Orientals draw over the open court in the center 
of their houses as a shelter in rain or hot weather. 
 
 

6. K&D, “The prophet now proceeds to describe the God whom both His works and word 
proclaim. The participles which follow are predicates of the subject, which filled the 
consciousness of the prophet as well as that of every believer. “He who is enthroned above the
vault of the earth, and its inhabitants resemble grasshoppers; who has spread out the heavens
like gauze, and stretched them out like a tent3roof to dwell in.” He, the manifested and yet 
unknown, is He who has for His throne the circle of the heavens (
exum[5Hx to MOo, 
Job_22:14), 
which arches over the earth, and to whom from His inaccessible height men appear as 
diminutive as grasshoppers (Num_13:33); He who has spread out the blue sky like a thin 
transparent garment (doq, a thin fabric, like daq, fine dust, in Isa_40:15), and stretched it out 
above the earth like a tent for dwelling in ('ohel 
(Note: The noun 
'ohel is derived from the root 
לא, from which come Arab. 'wl, coaluit, 
cohaesit, to thicken within or gain consistency (hence, regarded on another side, to lose in 
outward extent or outward bulk, to shrink; to go back to its original or essential condition; to 
issue in something as the final result; or generally, to draw back or return from a distance), 
and Arab. 
'h', to attach one's self or accustom one's self to a person or thing, equivalent to 
alifa and anisa; to take up one's abode in a place, or absolutely, to commence housekeeping 
by marrying, like the Italian 
accasarsi, Turkish ewlenmek (from ew, a house); or, when applied 
to a place itself, to be habitable, inhabited, and cultivated (= pass. 
uhila, more especially in 
the participle 
 txO., = p toO_ = ma‛mur). (Hence ahl, one who belongs to a person or place, with 
its numerous applications, and also 
ל ֶהּא, a tent (primarily a dwelling generally, Engl. abode), 
which stands at the end of this etymological series.) 
. tHxIvxISx). The participle brings to view the actions and circumstances of all times. In the 
present instance, where it is continued in the historical sense, it is to be resolved into the 
perfect; in other cases, the preservation of the world is evidently thought of as a creatio continua 
(see Psychol. P. 111). 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “22.It is he that sitteth. He pursues the same subject, though in a different manner, and
extols the glory and power of God. Why he does so we have already in some measure explained. It is
because we are so prone to distrust, that the very smallest occasion makes us waver; and therefore the
Prophet is constrained to repeat the same thing in many ways, that he may keep our weak and inconstant
hearts in the exercise of confidence in God. Formerly he spoke of the creation of the world, but now he
comes to the continual government of it; for God did not only for a single moment exert his power for
creating the world, but he manifests his power not less efficaciously in preserving it. And this is worthy of
observation; for our minds would be little impressed by knowing that God is the creator of the world, if his
hand were not continually stretched out for upholding it in existence. By the word sitteth the Prophet
means, that the earth does not remain firmly and permanently in its place any further than as it is upheld
by the power of God; for “” is a metaphorical term which denotes “”

The inhabitants of which are as locusts. By comparing the inhabitants of the earth to locusts, he reminds
us that God cannot be confined within such narrow boundaries, because “ the heavens (1Kg_8:27) do not
contain him;” that we may learn, whenever we mention God, to conceive nothing earthly or human as
belonging to his incomprehensible glory. Besides, this metaphor shews how ridiculous is the blindness of

men when they claim anything for themselves; for they gain by their boastings just as much as if some
small creatures, such as locusts, would elevate themselves by leaping; but they must immediately fall
back on the earth.

Spreadeth it out as a tent. David also employs the same form of expression, (Psa_104:2,) and both speak
of the aspect and spreading out of the heavens with respect to us; for they do not mean that God spreads
out the heavens, that he may dwell in them, but rather that there may be given to us a place of habitation
under them; for while the earth sustains, the heavens cover us, so that we have a dwelling close and
covered on all sides.

But it may be thought that these metaphors detract greatly from the dignity of the subject of which the
Prophet discourses, while his object is to commend and exalt it to the utmost of his power. What is
a curtain? What is a tent? I reply, these metaphors tend nevertheless to exalt the subject; for it is as if he
had said, “ it is as easy for God to spread out heaven, as for a man to spread out a curtain.” And he
leaves to every person to consider how great is the difference between heaven and a curtain, and what is
their size, which any person may easily understand. Lastly, there is an implied contrast between
tabernacles or houses (119) which men are long, and laboriously, and at great expense employed in
building, and yet which hardly rise to a hundred feet, and the immeasurable height of the heavens spread
out by an instantaneous act of the will of God, which makes abundantly manifest how great and how
excellent a workman he is.  
 
 
23 He brings princes to naught 
    and reduces the rulers of this world to nothing. 
 
 
1.BARNES, “That bringeth the princes to nothing - That is, all princes and kings. No 
matter how great their power, their wealth, and their dignity, they are, by his hand, reduced to 
nothing before him. The design of this passage is to contrast the majesty of God with that of 
princes and nobles, and to show how far he excels them all. The general truth is therefore stated, 
that all monarchs are by him removed from their thrones, and consigned to nothing. The same 
idea is expressed in 
Job_12:21 : 
He poureth contempt upon princes, 
And weakeneth the strength of the mighty. 
And in Psa_107:40 : 

He poureth contempt upon princes, 
And causeth them to wander in the wilderness where there is no way. 
The particular idea here, as appears from the next verse, is, that the princes and rulers who 
are opposed to God constitute no real resistance to the execution of his purposes. He can strip 
off their honors and glory, and obliterate even their names. 
He maketh the judges of the earth - Kings and princes often executed judgment 
personally, and hence, the words judges and kings seem to be synonymous as they are used 
here, and in Psa_2:10 : 
Be wise now, therefore, O ye kings; 
Be instructed, ye judges of the earth. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
That bringeth princes to nothing,.... The great men of the earth, kings, rulers, 
and nobles, these he brings to the dust; and all their counsels, schemes, and purposes, come to 
nothing; and their monarchies and kingdoms too in time. Where are now the Babylonish, 
Persian, and Grecian monarchies, and those great princes that formerly reigned in them? 
 
 
he maketh the judges of the earth as vanity; their decrees and decisions to stand for 
nothing, as "tohu" and "bohu", the first of which words is used here; so that they are no more 
regarded and attended to. 
 
3. HENRY, “
That those who appear and act against him, how formidable soever they may be 
to their fellow-creatures, will certainly be humble and brought down by the mighty hand of God, 
Isa_40:23, Isa_40:24. Princes and judges, who have great authority, and abuse it to the support 
of oppression and injustice, make nothing of those about them; as for all their enemies they puff
at them (Psa_10:5; Psa_12:5); but, when the great God takes them to task, he brings them to 
nothing; he humbles them, and tames them, and makes them as vanity, little regarded, neither 
feared nor loved. He makes them utterly unable to stand before his judgments, which shall 
either, [1.] Prevent their settlement in their authority: They shall not be planted; they shall not
be sown; and those are the two ways of propagating plants, either by seed or slips. Nay, if they 
should gain a little interest, and so be planted or sown, yet their stock shall not take root in the
earth, they shall not continue long in power. Eliphaz saw the foolish taking root, but suddenly
cursed their habitation. And then how soon is the fig-tree withered away! Or, [2.] He will blast 
them when they think they are settled. He does but blow upon them, and then they shall wither, 
and come to nothing, and the whirlwind shall take them away as stubble. For God's wrath, 
though it seem at first to blow slightly upon them, will soon become a mighty whirlwind. When 
God judges he will overcome. Those that will not bow before him cannot stand before him. 
 
4. JAMISON, “
(
Psa_107:4; Dan_2:21). 
judges — that is, rulers; for these exercised judicial authority (Psa_2:10). The Hebrew,
shophtee, answers to the Carthaginian chief magistrates, suffetes. 
 
 

5. K&D, “This is followed by a series of predicates of God the Ruler of the universe. “He who
giveth up rulers to annihilation; maketh judges of the earth like a desolation. They are hardly
planted, hardly sown, their stem has hardly taken root in the earth, and He only blows upon
them, and they dry up, and the storm carries them away like stubble.” There is nothing so high 
and inaccessible in the world, that He cannot bring it to nothing, even in the midst of its most 
self-confident and threatening exaltation. 
Roz
e
nı̄m are solemn persons, 
σε8νοί, possessors of the 
greatest distinction and influence; 
shoph
e
lı̄m, those who combine in themselves the highest 
judicial and administrative power. The former He gives up to annihilation; the latter He brings 
into a condition resembling the negative state of the 
tohu out of which the world was produced, 
and to which it can be reduced again. We are reminded here of such descriptions as 
Job_12:17, 
Job_12:24. The suddenness of the catastrophe is depicted in Isa_40:24. ף? 3ַEל (which only 
occurs here), when followed by םַגְו in the apodosis (cf., 2Ki_20:4), signifies that even this has not 
yet taken place when the other also occurs: hence vixdum plantati sunt, etc. The niphal ע ַ?ִנ and 
the pual ע ַרּז denote the hopeful commencement; the poelשׁ ֵרּשׁ the hopeful continuation. A layer 
or seed excites the hope of blossom and fruit, more especially when it has taken root; but 
nothing more is needed than a breath of Jehovah, and it is all over with it (the verb 
s tHx Cx is 
used in this verse, where plants with stems are referred to; a verb with a softer labial, 
s tHx vx, 
was employed above in connection with grass and flowers). A single withering breath lays them 
at rest; and by the power of Jehovah there rises a stormy wind, which carries them away like 
light dry stubble (
א ָשָׂנ); compare, on the other hand, the verb used in Isa_40:15, viz., tul = s tS ., 
to lift up, to keep in the air). 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “23.He bringeth the mighty to nothing. He proceeds in extolling the providence of God, by
which he governs the whole world, but more especially mankind. Already and but a little ago he had
begun to remark that God did not create the world, so as afterwards to allow it to be governed by chance,
but that he undertakes the preservation of it, and keeps it under his power and authority; but as he deigns
to look more closely at mankind, so the Prophet selects this department, that by means of it he may extol
God’ providence. The sum of what he says is, that God’ government extends far and wide, so that he
directs and governs everything according to his pleasure; but he shews, (what was also highly
advantageous to be known,) that even in the life of men striking proofs of the immediate exercise of the
power of God are visible, and, not even satisfied with the general doctrine, he brings forward one class
which ought still more to arouse our attention.

The governors of the earth as if they were not. (120) Anything that happens to the undistinguished mass of
common people is despised and passed by as unworthy of being observed; but when kingdoms and
monarchies, or men of high rank, fall from their elevation, it seems as if the earth had been shaken; and
the Prophet skilfully avails himself of such proofs to arouse us. It might, indeed, be supposed that princes
and magistrates are exempted from the common lot, and are not subject to the ordinary miseries of men;
for by their splendor they dazzle the eyes and understandings of all men. But their lustre is entirely
dimmed; and therefore the Prophet especially mentions them, and declares that the Lord “ them to
nothing.” And if the hand of God is so powerful against nobles and princes, what must we think of the
common people? Will he not also treat the ordinary crowd according to his pleasure, and drive them

wherever he thinks fit? Will he not either give or take away from them, whenever he pleases, both
strength and courage?



(120) “ maketh the judges of the earth as vanity.” — Eng. Ver. “ judges (or rulers) of the earth like
emptiness (or desolation) he has made.” —Alexander.  
 
24 No sooner are they planted, 
    no sooner are they sown, 
    no sooner do they take root in the ground, 
than he blows on them and they wither, 
    and a whirlwind sweeps them away like chaff. 
 
1.BARNES, “Yea, they shall not be planted - The kings and rulers - especially they who 
oppose God in the execution of his purposes. The idea in this verse is, that their name and family 
should become extinct in the same way as a tree does from which no shoot starts up. Although 
they were great and mighty, like the tree that sends out far-spreading branches, and strikes its 
roots deep, yet God would so utterly destroy them that they should have no posterity, and their 
family become extinct. Princes and kings are often compared to lofty and majestic trees of the 
forest (compare 
Psa_37:35; Dan_4:7 ff) Vitringa supposes that wicked rulers are particularly 
intended here, and that the idea is, that the wicked princes that persecuted his people should be 
entirely extinct on the earth. He refers particularly to Pharaoh, Antiochus Epiphanes, Nero, 
Domitian, Decius, Gallus, Galerius, Maxenus, Maximus, and some others, as instances of this 
kind, whose families soon became extinct. It may be remarked, in general, that the families of 
monarchs and princes become extinct usually much sooner than others. The fact may be owing 
in part to the usual luxury and vice in the families of the great, and in part to the direct 
arrangements of God, by which he designs that power shall not be forever perpetuated in one 
family, or line. The general idea in the passage is, that earthly princes and rulers are as nothing 
When compared with God, and that he can easily destroy their families and their name. But 
there is no improbability in the supposition of Vitringa, that the prophet refers particularly to 
the enemies of God and his cause, and that he intends specifically to affirm that none of these 
enemies could prevent or embarrass the execution of his purposes - since with infinite ease he 
could entirely destroy their name. 
They shall not be sown - The same idea under another figure. The former referred to 
princes under the image of a tree; this refers to them under the image of grain that is sown. The 

idea is, that their family and name should be annihilated, and should not spring up in a future 
generation. The same image occurs in Nah_1:14, in respect to the king of Assyria: ‘The Lord hath 
given commandment concerning thee, that no more of thy name be sown;’ that is, that thy name 
and family should become entirely extinct. 
Yea, their stock - Their stem - referring to the stump or stock of a tree. When a tree is cut 
down, the roots often still live, and send up shoots, or suckers, that grow into trees. Posterity is 
often, in the Scriptures, compared to such suckers or shoots from old and decayed trees (see the 
notes at Isa_11:1). The meaning here is, that as when a tree falls and dies without sending up any 
shoots, so princes should die. They should have no descendants; no one of their family should sit 
on their thrones. 
Shall blow upon them - As God sends a tempest upon the forest and uproots the loftiest 
trees, so he will sweep away the families of princes. Or rather, perhaps, the idea here is, that God 
sends a strong and burning east wind, and withers up everything before it (see this wind 
described in the notes at Isa_37:26). 
And they shall wither - Trees, and shrubs, and plants are dried up before that poisonous 
and fiery wind - the simoom - and so it would be with the princes before the blast of Yahweh. 
And the whirlwind shall take them away as stubble - This, in its literal signification, 
means that the whirlwind bears away the trees of the forest, and with the same ease God would 
sweep away the families of the kings and princes that opposed him and oppressed his people. It 
may illustrate this to observe, that the effects of whirlwinds in the East are often much more 
violent than they are with us, and that they often bear away to a great distance the branches of 
trees, and even the trees themselves. The following description of a whirlwind observed by Mr. 
Bruce, may serve to illustrate this passage, as well as the passage in Psa_83:13 : 
O my God, make them like a wheel; 
As the stubble before the wind, 
referring to the rotary action of the whirlwind, which often impels straw like a wheel set in 
rapid motion. ‘Mr. Bruce, in his journey through the desert of Senaar, had the singular felicity to 
contemplate this wonderful phenomenon in all its terrific majesty, without injury, although with 
considerable danger and alarm. In that vast expanse of desert, from west and to northwest of 
him, he saw a number of prodigious pillars of sand at different distances, moving, at times, with 
great celerity, at others, stalking on with majestic slowness; at intervals he thought they were 
coming, in a very few minutes, to overwhelm him and his companion. Again, they would retreat 
so as to be almost out of sight, their tops reaching to the very clouds. There, the tops often 
separated from the bodies; and these, once disjoined, dispersed in the air, and appeared no 
more. Sometimes they were broken near the middle, as if struck with a large cannon-shot. 
About noon, they began to advance with considerable swiftness upon them, the wind being 
very strong at north. Eleven of these awful visitors ranged alongside of them, about the distance 
of three miles. The greatest diameter of the largest appeared to him, at that distance, as if it 
would measure ten feet. They retired from them with a wind at southeast, leaving an impression 
upon the mind of our intrepid traveler, to which he could give no name, though he candidly 
admits that one ingredient in it was fear, with a considerable deal of wonder and astonishment. 
He declares it was in vain to think of flying; the swiftest horse, or fastest sailing ship, could be of 
no use to carry them out of this danger; and the full persuasion of this riveted him to the spot 
where he stood. Next day, they were gratified with a similar display of moving pillars, in form 
and disposition like those already described, only they seemed to be more in number and less in 
size. 
They came, several times, in a direction close upon them; that is, according to Mr. Bruce’s 
computation, within less than two miles. They became, immediately after sunrise, like a thick 

wood, and almost darkened the sun; his rays shining through them for near an hour, gave them 
an appearance of pillars of fire. At another time, they were terrified by an army (as it seemed) of 
these sand pillars, whose march was constantly south, a number of which seemed once to be 
coming directly upon them; and though they were little nearer than two miles, a considerable 
quantity of sand fell around them. On the 21st of November, about eight in the morning, he had 
a view of the desert to the westward, as before, and the sands had already begun to rise in 
immense twisted pillars, which darkened the heavens, and moved over the desert with more 
magnificence than ever. The sun, shining through the pillars, which were thicker, and contained 
more sand, apparently, than on any of the preceding days, seemed to give those nearest them an 
appearance as if spotted with stars of gold.’ (Paxton) 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
And he shall also blow upon them “And if he but blow upon them” - 
The Septuagint, Syriac, Vulgate, and MS. Bodl., with another, have 
םג  gam, only, without the 
conjunction ו  vau, and. 
 
3. GILL, “
Yea, they shall not be planted,.... As trees are, like the cedars in Lebanon, though 
they may seem to be such; but be like the grass of the field, and herbs of the earth: or, "even they 
shall be", as if they were "not planted 
(c)", they shall not grow and flourish; or they shall be 
plucked up, and be no more; this is said of the princes and judges of the earth; nay,  
 
they shall not be sown; as seed is, which springing up, brings forth fruit, but so it shall not be 
with them; or they shall be as if they had not been sown, no fruit being brought forth by them:  
 
yea, their stock shall not take root in the earth; so as to continue and abide, but they 
shall soon vanish and disappear, as the most powerful princes and wisest judges do. The Targum 
is,  
 
"although they multiply, although they increase, although their children become great in the 
earth:''  
 
"and" or "yea",  
 
he shall also blow upon them, and they shall wither; as grass withers, when a severe 
wind blows upon it:  
 
and the whirlwind shall take them away as stubble; which is not able to stand before the 
force of it; and as unable are the greatest potentates on earth to stand before the tempest of 
divine wrath and vengeance; if God blows but upon them in anger, all their glory and grandeur, 
pomp and power, wither away like the flower of the field; and especially if he comes forth in all 
the fury of his wrath in a tempestuous way against them, they are no more able to stand before 
him that stubble before a violent storm: see Rev_6:15. The Targum is,  
 
"yet, even he will send his fury upon them; and his word shall take them away, as a whirlwind 
stubble.''  
 

4. JAMISON, “they — the “princes and judges” (Isa_40:23) who oppose God’s purposes and 
God’s people. Often compared to tall trees (Psa_37:35; Dan_4:10). 
not ... sown — the seed, that is, race shall become extinct (Nah_1:14). 
stock — not even shall any shoots spring up from the stump when the tree has been cut 
down: no descendants whatever (Job_14:7; see on Isa_11:1). 
and ... also — so the Septuagint. But Maurer translates, “They are hardly (literally, ‘not yet’, 
as in 2Ki_20:4) planted (etc.) when He (God) blows upon them.” 
blow — The image is from the hot east wind (simoon) that “withers” vegetation. 
whirlwind ... stubble — (Psa_83:13), where, “like a wheel,” refers to the rotatory action of 
the whirlwind on the stubble. 
 
 
5. K&D, “
This is followed by a series of predicates of God the Ruler of the universe. “He who
giveth up rulers to annihilation; maketh judges of the earth like a desolation. They are hardly
planted, hardly sown, their stem has hardly taken root in the earth, and He only blows upon
them, and they dry up, and the storm carries them away like stubble.” There is nothing so high 
and inaccessible in the world, that He cannot bring it to nothing, even in the midst of its most 
self-confident and threatening exaltation. 
Roz
e
nı̄m are solemn persons, 
σε8νοί, possessors of the 
greatest distinction and influence; 
shoph
e
lı̄m, those who combine in themselves the highest 
judicial and administrative power. The former He gives up to annihilation; the latter He brings 
into a condition resembling the negative state of the 
tohu out of which the world was produced, 
and to which it can be reduced again. We are reminded here of such descriptions as 
Job_12:17, 
Job_12:24. The suddenness of the catastrophe is depicted in Isa_40:24. ף? ל ַE (which only 
occurs here), when followed by םַגְו in the apodosis (cf., 2Ki_20:4), signifies that even this has not 
yet taken place when the other also occurs: hence vixdum plantati sunt, etc. The niphal ע ַ?ִנ and 
the pual ע ַרּז denote the hopeful commencement; the poelשׁ ֵרּשׁ the hopeful continuation. A layer 
or seed excites the hope of blossom and fruit, more especially when it has taken root; but 
nothing more is needed than a breath of Jehovah, and it is all over with it (the verb 
s tHx Cx is 
used in this verse, where plants with stems are referred to; a verb with a softer labial, 
s tHx vx, 
was employed above in connection with grass and flowers). A single withering breath lays them 
at rest; and by the power of Jehovah there rises a stormy wind, which carries them away like 
light dry stubble (
א ָשָׂנ); compare, on the other hand, the verb used in Isa_40:15, viz., tul = s tS ., 
to lift up, to keep in the air). 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “24.It is as if they had not been planted. Though the particle ףא (aph) signifies also, yet in
this passage it may be more appropriately rendered “ that;” and thus the plain meaning will be, “ that you
may say that they were not planted or sown.” It is an amplification of what he had formerly said, for he
shews that the princes are totally destroyed and rooted out, so that no trace of them is left, any more than
if they had never existed. So long as they remain in prosperity, they appear to be so strong as to be
beyond the possibility of being thrown down by any adverse event. (121) but such changes happen as blot

out their name and remembrance, so that you would say that they had never existed; and we see that this
has happened not only to men but even to very flourishing kingdoms.

Since, therefore, great downfalls are so many tokens of God’ dreadful power, let us learn not to lean on
earthly and deceitful supports, but, whatever may be the amount of our riches or strength, let us depend
on him. God does not, as heathen men babble, turn about this world like a ball, as if he took pleasure in
this game; but whenever any person is highly elevated, he never ceases from insolent boasting till he is
thrown down headlong, so that the judgments of God are always manifest. We are also reminded by it,
that it is wrong to ascribe to fortune or to any other cause the various events that happen; for God was
not an instantaneous Creator, that would immediately abandon the charge of his work, but incessantly
applies his hand, so that nothing is done but by his will and pleasure. Seeing that various changes thus
happen in the world, seeing that those things which were thought to be firm and stable are transitory and
fading, let us turn our minds to that supreme providence of God.

Even while he bloweth on them. Hence he shows how light and trivial before God are those things which
commonly dazzle our eyes and fill us with amazement; for we cannot think of any great king without being
perfectly alarmed and stupified. But he shows that kings and princes are like stubble before God, by
whose breath they are driven, as by a whirlwind, at any instant that he pleases. We are therefore taught
that we ought never to be overwhelmed by the sight of any creature, so as not to render to God the honor
and glory that are due to him. This ought to have been carefully considered by the Jews, who would have
thought that that monarchy of the Babylonians, whose captives they were, would never be destroyed, and
that they could not be rescued out of their hands, if they had not called to remembrance this doctrine, that
nothing in this world is so durable that it may not be dissolved by the breath of God. That they may not
despair of their salvation, the Prophet reminds them that God, as soon as he shall be pleased to thunder
from heaven, will crush all that strength in their enemies that terrifies them, so that it shall vanish away.



(121) “Que le vent d’ ne les puisse abattre.” “ the wind of adversity cannot throw them down.”  
 
 
25 “To whom will you compare me? 
    Or who is my equal?” says the Holy One. 
 
1.BARNES, “To whom then will ye liken me? - (See 
Isa_40:18) The prophet having thus 
set forth the majesty and glory of God, asks now with great emphasis, what could be an adequate 
and proper representation of such a God. And if God was such a Being, how great was the folly of 
idolatry, and how vain all their confidence in the gods which their own hands had made. 
 

 
2.  GILL, “
To whom then will ye liken me, or shall I be equal, saith the Holy One? Or 
be upon a level with? since the greatest of men on earth are brought to nothing by him, and are 
no more: this is repeated from 
Isa_40:18 and supported with fresh strength of argument, to 
show that there is nothing whatever, that is a fit likeness and similitude, by which to represent 
the Lord.
 
3. K&D, “
The thought of 
Isa_40:18 now recurs like a refrain, a conclusion being appended to 
the premises by means of ו, as was the case there. “And to whom will ye compare me, to whom I
can be equal? saith the Holy One.” Not 
x "" tQkmHx, because a poetical or oratorical style omits 
the article wherever it can be dispensed with. The Holy One asks this, and can ask it, because as 
such He is also exalted above the whole world (
Job_15:15; Job_25:5). 
 
4.  CALVIN, “25.And to whom will ye liken me? He repeats the former statement, (Isa_40:18,) by
which he said that the Lord would not suffer himself to be likened to idols; that the Jews might not in any
degree detract, from his power, on account of their having been so long held captive in the hand of
unbelievers, or think that idols are anything on account of the prosperity of their worshippers, whom they
were compelled to serve; for, by reasoning in this manner about the power of the true God and of idols,
they would have compared him with idols. On this account he repeats, as it were in indignation, “ whom
will ye liken me?” as if he had said, “ you rob me of my majesty by your comparisons?” For although men
have various thoughts of God, and transform him according to their fancy, yet he continues to be like
himself, for he does not change his nature on account of the inventions of men.

Saith the Holy One. He appropriately applies to God the term Holy, by which title he indirectly blames or
accuses the Jews of base ingratitude, if, as they have been set apart by him, they do not sanctify him in
return. No holiness will be found in the gods of the Gentiles; they are the mere inventions of men. A
grievous injury therefore is done to God, and he is basely degraded from his rank, when idols are brought
into collision with him, and when it becomes a subject of debate if they can do more than God himself.  
 
 
26 Lift up your eyes and look to the heavens: 
    Who created all these? 
He who brings out the starry host one by one 
    and calls forth each of them by name. 

Because of his great power and mighty strength, 
    not one of them is missing. 
 
1.BARNES, “Lift up your eyes on high - Direct your eyes toward heaven, and in the 
contemplation of the wonders of the starry world, and of God’s power there, learn the evidence 
of his ability to destroy his foes and to save his friends. Lowth connects this verse with the 
former, and renders it: 
‘Saith the Holy One, 
Lift up your eyes on high.’ 
The words ‘on high’ here are evidently synonymous with heaven, and refer to the starry 
worlds. The design of the passage is to convince them of the folly of idolatry, and of the power 
and majesty, of the true God. It is proof of man’s elevated nature that he can thus look upward, 
and trace the evidences of the power and wisdom of God in the heavens; that he can raise his 
eyes and thoughts above the earth, and fix his attention on the works of God in distant worlds; 
and in the number, the order, the greatness, and the harmony of the heavenly bodies, trace the 
proofs of the infinite greatness and the wisdom of God. This thought was most beautifully 
expressed by one of the ancient poets. 
Pronaque cum spectent animalia caetera terram;
Os homini sublime dedit: ccelumque tueri,
Jussit et erectos ad sidera tollere vultus. 
Ovid, Met. i. 84386.
In the Scriptures, God not unfrequently appeals to the starry heavens in proof of his existence 
and perfections, and as the most sublime exhibition of his greatness and power (see 
Psa_19:1-6). 
And it may be remarked, that this argument is one that increases in strength, in the view of 
people, from age to age, just in proportion to the advances which are made in the science of 
astronomy. It is now far more striking than it was in the times of Isaiah; and, indeed, the 
discoveries in astronomical science in modern times have given a beauty and power to this 
argument which could have been but imperfectly understood in the times of the prophets. The 
argument is one that accumulates with every new discovery in astronomy; but is one - such is 
the vastness and beauty of the system of the universe - which can be contemplated in its fall 
power only amidst the more sublime contemplations of eternity. Those who are disposed to 
contemplate this argument more fully, may find it presented with great eloquence and beauty in 
Dr. Chalmers’ Astronomical Discourses, and in Dick’s Christian Philosopher. 
Who hath created these things - These heavens. This is the first evidence of the power of 
God in the contemplation of the heavens, that God is their Creator. The other demonstrations 
referred to are the fact, that he brings out their armies as if they were a marshalled host, and 
understands and calls all their names. 
That bringeth out their hosts - Their armies, for so the word ‘hosts’ means (see the note at 
Isa_1:9). The word here alludes to the fact that the heavenly bodies seem to be marshalled, or 
regularly arrayed as an array; that they keep their place, preserve their order, and are apparently 
led on from the east to the west, like a vast army under a mighty leader: 

Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? 
Or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons? 
Job_38:32
By number - As if he had numbered, or named them; as a military commander would call 
forth his armies in their proper order, and have them so numbered and enrolled in the various 
divisions, that he can command them with ease. 
He calleth them all by names - This idea is also taken from a military leader, who would 
know the names of the individuals that composed his army. In smaller divisions of an army, this 
could of course be done; but the idea is, that God is intimately acquainted with all the hosts of 
stars; that though their numbers appear to us so great, yet he is acquainted with each one 
individually, and has that knowledge of it which we have of a person or object which we 
recognize by a name. It is said of Cyrus, that he was acquainted by name with every individual 
that composed his vast army. The practice of giving names to the stars of heaven was early, and 
is known to have been originated by the Chaldeans. Intimations of this custom we have not 
unfrequently in the Scriptures, as far back as the time of Job: 
Which maketh Arcturus, and Orion, and Pleiades, 
And the chambers of the south. 
Job_9:9
Canst thou bind the sweet influences of Pleiades? 
Or loose the bands of Orion? 
Canst thou bring forth Mazzaroth in his season? 
Or canst thou guide Arcturus with his sons? 
Job_38:31332
This power of giving names to all the stars, is beautifully ascribed to God in Psa_147:4 : 
He telleth the number of the stars, 
He calleth them all by their names. 
This view of the greatness of God is more striking now than it was in the times of David or 
Isaiah. Little then, comparatively, was known of the number of the stars. But since the invention 
of the telescope the view of the heavenly world has been enlarged almost to immensity; arid 
though the expression ‘he calleth them all by their names,’ had great sublimity as used in the 
time of Isaiah, yet it raises in us far higher conceptions of the power and greatness of God when 
applied to what we know now of the heavens. Yet doubtless our view of the heavens is much 
further beneath the sublime reality than were the prevalent views in the time of the prophet 
beneath those which we now have. As an illustration of this we may remark, that the milky way 
which stretches across the heavens, is now ascertained to receive its white appearance from the 
mingling together of the light of an innumerable number of stars, too remote to be seen by the 
naked eye. Dr. Herschell examined a portion of the milky way about fifteen degrees long, and 
two broad, and found that it contained no fewer than fifty thousand stars, large enough to be 
distinctly counted, and he suspected that that portion contained twice as manymore, which, for 
the want of sufficient light in his telescope, he saw only now and then. It is to be remembered, 
also, that the galaxy, or milky way, which we see with the naked eye, is only one of a large 
number of nebulae of similar construction which are arranged apparently in strata, and which 
extend to great length in the heavens. According to this, and on every correct supposition in 
regard to the heavens, the number of the stars surpasses all our powers of computation. Yet God 
is said to lead them all forth as marshalled armies - how beautiful a description when applied to 
the nebuloe! - and to call all their names. 

By the greatness of his might - It is his single and unassisted arm that conducts them; his 
own hand alone that sustains them. 
Not one faileth - Not one is missing; not one of the immense host is out of its place, or 
unnoticed. All are arranged in infinite wisdom; all observe the proper order, and the proper 
times. How strikingly true is this, on the slightest inspection of the heavens. How im pressive 
and grand is it in the higher developments of the discoveries of astronomy! 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
Left up your eyes on high - The rabbins say, He who is capable of 
meditating on the revolutions of the heavenly bodies, and does not meditate on them, is not 
worthy to have his name mentioned among men. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Lift up your eyes on high,.... From the earth, and the inhabitants of it, even those 
of the greatest power and influence in it, to the heavens above, those that are visible to the eye:  
 
and behold who hath created these things; that are seen in the heavens, the sun, moon, 
and stars; consider the Creator of them, what a glorious Being he must be; what power he must 
be possessed of; what dazzling light he must dwell in; what glory and majesty he must be clothed 
with; and how infinitely transcending all mortal creatures he must be:  
 
that bringeth out their host by number; not only into being, at the first creation of them, 
but at every proper season; causing the sun to rise every morning, the stars to appear at night, 
and the moon in its revolution; as a general brings forth his army, marshals it in order, musters 
it, and takes the number of his soldiers:  
 
he calleth them all by names; suitable to their position and influence; he knows the proper 
names of them all, which no astrologer can pretend unto; and this is such knowledge as no 
general of an army has; for though the stars are innumerable to men, the names of most 
unknown, they are all known to him that made them, 
Psa_147:4,  
 
by the greatness of his might, for that he is strong in power not one faileth; through 
the omnipotence of God, not only the sun and moon, the great luminaries, are continued in 
being, and constantly observe their order; but even every star keeps its place, or performs its 
course, and retains its influence, and in every instance obeys the commands of its Creator; never 
fails of appearing at his order, and of doing what he appoints it should. Kimchi gives the sense 
thus, that according to the virtue and efficacy that there is in every star, so is its name; and 
because of the strength and power that is in everyone of them, they remain unchangeably and 
unalterably the same as when they were first created; which not only holds true of the sun and 
moon, but of the stars lesser and greater. The Targum is,  
 
"because of the multitude of strength, and the power of might, not one is hindered from its 
order;''  
 
wherefore, as there is no likeness on earth, so none in heaven, with which the Lord is to be 
likened, or to which he can be equalled. This may respect not the might and power of the Lord, 
in supporting and maintaining these creatures in their being and usefulness; but the strength 
and power of the mightiest creatures, to hinder their influence and service: for the words may be 

rendered, "through the multitude of strength", or anyone being "strong in power, not one indeed 
fails (d)"; or is wanting, that is, through the strength or power of the mightiest creatures, angels 
or men, the hosts of heaven cannot be stopped in their course, or hindered in their work 
appointed to do, or be deprived of their being.  
 
4. HENRY, “
He appeals to what their eyes saw of him (
Isa_40:26): “Lift up your eyes on
high; be not always poring on this earth” (O curvae in terras animae et coelestium inanes! - 
Degenerate minds, that can bend so towards the earth, having nothing celestial in them!), “but 
sometimes look up” (Os homini sublime dedit, coelumque tueri jussit - Heaven gave to man an
erect countenance, and bade him gaze on the stars); “behold the glorious lights of heaven, 
consider who has created them. They neither made nor marshalled themselves; doubtless, 
therefore, there is a God that gave them their being, power, and motion.” What we see of the 
creature should lead us to the Creator. The idolaters, when they lifted up their eyes and beheld 
the hosts of heaven, being wholly immerged in sense, looked no further, but worshipped them, 
Deu_4:19; Job_31:26. Therefore the prophet here directs us to make use of our reason as well as 
our senses, and to consider who created them, and to pay our homage to him. Give him the glory 
of his sovereignty over them - He brings out their host by number, as a general draws out the 
squadrons and battalions of his army; of the knowledge he has of them - He calls them all by
names, proper names, according as their place and influence are (Psa_147:4); and of the use he 
makes of them; when he calls them out to any service, so obsequious are they that, by the
greatness of his might, not one of them fails, but, as when the stars in their courses fought
against Sisera, every one does that to which he is appointed. To make these creatures therefore 
rivals with God, which are such ready servants to him, is an injury to them as well as an affront 
to him. 
 
 
5. JAMISON, “
bringeth out ... host — image from a general reviewing his army: He is 
Lord of Sabaoth, the heavenly hosts (
Job_38:32). 
calleth ... by names — numerous as the stars are. God knows each in all its distinguishing 
characteristics - a sense which “name” often bears in Scripture; so in Gen_2:19, Gen_2:20, 
Adam, as God’s vicegerent, called the beasts by name, that is, characterized them by their 
several qualities, which, indeed, He has imparted. 
by the greatness ... faileth — rather, “by reason of abundance of (their inner essential) 
force and firmness of strength, not one of them is driven astray”; referring to the sufficiency of 
the physical forces with which He has endowed the heavenly bodies, to prevent all disorder in 
their motions [Horsley]. In English Version the sense is, “He has endowed them with their 
peculiar attributes (‘names’) by the greatness of His might,” and the power of His strength (the 
better rendering, instead of, “for that He is strong”). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
After the questions in 
Isa_40:18 and Isa_40:25, which close syllogistically, a third 
start is made, to demonstrate the incomparable nature of Jehovah. “Lift up your eyes on high,
and see: who hath created these things? It is He who bringeth out their host by number, calleth
them all by names, because of the greatness of (His) might, and as being strong in power:
there is not one that is missing.” Jehovah spoke in Isa_40:25; now the prophet speaks again. 
We have here the same interchange which occurs in every prophetic book from Deuteronomy 

downwards, and in which the divine fulness of the prophets is displayed. The answer does not 
begin with אי ִצוֹ? ַה, in the sense of “He who brings them out has created them;” but the participle 
is the predicate to the subject of which the prophet's soul is full: Jehovah, it is He who brings out 
the army of stars upon the plane of heaven, as a general leads out his army upon the field of 
battle, and that 
b
e
oOHC t_, by number, counting the innumerable stars, those children of light in 
armour of light, which meet the eye as it looks up by night. The finite verb 
א ָר ְק ִי denotes that 
which takes place every night. He calls them all by name (comp. the derivative passage, 
Psa_147:4): this He does on account of the greatness and fulness of His might ( 'onı̄m, vires, 
virtus), and as strong in power, i.e., because He is so. This explanation is simpler than Ewald's 
(§293, c), viz., “because of the power (τ?3κρατερ?ν) of the Strong One.” The call addressed to the 
stars that are to rise is the call of the Almighty, and therefore not one of all the innumerable host 
remains behind. שׁי ִא individualizes; ר ָG ְעֶנ (participle), as in Isa_34:16, suggests the idea of a sheep 
that is missed from the flock through staying behind. The second part of the address closes here, 
having demonstrated the folly of idolatry from the infinite superiority of God; and from this the 
third part deduces consolation for Israel in the midst of its despair. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “26.Lift up your eyes on high. The Prophet appears to linger too long on this subject, more
especially because it presents no obscurity; for he repeats by many statements what is acknowledged by
all, that God’ wonderful power and wisdom may be known from the beautiful order of the world. But we
ought to observe what I have already said, that we are so wicked and ungrateful judges of the divine
power, that we often imagine God to be inferior to some feeble man. We are more terrified frequently by
the empty mask of a single man (122) than we are strengthened by all the promises of God. Not in vain,
therefore, does the Prophet repeat that God is defrauded of his honor, if his power do not lead us to warm
admiration of him; nor does he spend his labor in what is superfluous, for we are so dull and sluggish that
we need to be continually aroused and excited.

Men see every day the heavens and the stars; but who is there that thinks about their Author? By nature
men are formed in such a manner as to make it evident that they were born to contemplate the heavens,
and thus to learn their Author; for while God formed other animals to look downwards for pasture, he
made man alone erect, and bade him look at what may be regarded as his own habitation.

This is also described beautifully by a poet: (123) “ other animals look downwards towards the earth, he
gave to man a lofty face, and bade him look at heaven, and lift up his countenance erect towards the
stars.” (124) The Prophet therefore points out the wickedness of men who do not acknowledge what is
openly placed before their eyes concerning God, but, like cattle, fix their snout in the earth; for, whenever
we raise our eyes upwards, with any degree of attention, it is impossible for our senses not to be struck
with the majesty of God.

And see who hath created them. By mentioning the stars, he states more clearly that the wonderful order
which shines brightly in the face of the heavens preaches loudly that there is one God and Creator of the
world; and all who shall observe, that amidst the vast number and variety of the stars, so regular an order
and course is so well maintained, will be constrained to make this acknowledgment. For it is not by
chance that each of the stars has had its place assigned to it, nor is it at random that they advance
uniformly with so great rapidity, and amidst numerous windings move straight forwards, so that they do

not deviate a hairbreadth from the path which God has marked out for them. Thus does their wonderful
arrangement shew that God is the Author and worker, so that men cannot open their eyes without being
constrained to behold the majesty of God in his works.

Bringing out by number their army. Under the word army he, includes two things; their almost infinite
number, and their admirable arrangement; for a small number of persons do not constitute an army, and
not even a considerable number, if there be not also numerous companies. Besides, it is not called an “”
when men are collected together at random, and without any selection, and in a confused manner, or
when they wander about in a disorderly state, but where there are various classes of officers, who have
the charge of ten, or a hundred, or a thousand men, (125) and where the ranks are drawn up and
arranged on a fixed plan. Thus the wonderful arrangement of the stars, and their certain courses, may
justly be called an “”

By the word number he means that God always has this “” at his command. In an army the soldiers may
wander, and may not be immediately collected or brought back to their ranks by the general, though the
trumpet sound. But it is otherwise with God. He always has his soldiers in readiness, and that “ number;”
that is, he keeps a reckoning of them, so that not one of them is absent.

He will call to all of them by name. The same expression occurs, (Psa_147:4,) and in the same sense.
Some explain it to mean that God knows the number of the stars, which is unknown to us. But David and
Isaiah meant a different thing, that is, that God makes use of the stars according to his pleasure; as if one
should command a servant, calling him to him by name; and the same thing will afterwards be said of
Cyrus, whose labors and service the Lord employed in delivering his people. (Isa_45:1.) In a word, it
denotes the utmost submission and obedience, when he who is called instantly answers to his name.

By the greatness of his strength. Those who explain the preceding clause to mean that the Lord knows
the number of the stars, are also mistaken in supposing that by giving them their names is meant their
power and office. Others explain it, that there is not a star that has not its own power and energy,
because the Lord gave to them those qualities they would always possess. But others connect these
words with ארקי, (yikra,) “ shall call;” as if he had said, “ Lord is so powerful that all the stars listen to his
commands.” But a meaning which appears to me to be more appropriate is, that God is so powerful, that,
as soon as he has issued an order, all the armies of the stars are ready to yield obedience. In this we
have an extraordinary proof of his power, when those highly excellent, creatures unhesitatingly submit to
him, and by executing his orders testify that they acknowledge him to be their Author.

Not one shall be wanting. The word שיא (ish) is applied by Hebrew writers not only to men and women,
but also to other animals, and even to inanimate objects, as in a former passage, (Isa_34:16,) when,
speaking of the birds that should occupy those splendid abodes, he said that “not one should be wanting,”
he used the word שיא (ish).  (126) These words commend to us the power of God, that we may know that
there is nothing in heaven or in earth that does not depend on his will and pleasure. Nothing, therefore,
can be more shameful or unreasonable than to compare him to idols, which are as worthless as anything
can possibly be. (127)



(122) “L’ d’ ver de terre.” “ appearance of a worm of the earth.”

(123) “Par un poete profane.” “ a heathen poet.”

(124)

“Pronaque quum spectent animalia caetera terram,

Os homini sublime dedit, coelumque videre

Jussit, et erectos ad sidera tollere vultus.”

Some readers will, perhaps, thank me for a translation of the above passage into French rhyme, taken
from the French version of this Commentary. — Ed. 

“ Et neantmoins que tout autre animal  
 
Iette toujours son regard principal  
 
En contre bas, Dieu a Phomme a donne  
 
La face haute, et luy a ordonne  
 
De regarder l’ des cieux,  
 
Et d’ aux estoilles ses yeux ”

(125) “Mais celle ou il y aura des sergens de bande, capitaines, colonels et autres conducteurs.” “ where
there shall be serjeants of companies, captains, colonels, and other officers.”

(126) In the passage referred to, although not שיא (ish) but the feminine form השא (ishshah) is used, this
does not invalidate our author’ argument. — Ed. 

(127) “Qui sont plus vaines que la vanite mesme.” “ are more vain than vanity itself.”  
 
 
27 Why do you complain, Jacob? 
    Why do you say, Israel, 
“My way is hidden from the Lord; 
    my cause is disregarded by my God”? 

 
1.BARNES, “Why sayest thou? - This verse is designed to reprove the people for their 
want of confidence in God. The idea is, ‘If God is so great; if be arranges the hosts of heaven with 
such unerring skill, causing all the stars to observe their proper place and their exact times, the 
interests of his people are safe in his hands.’ Piety may always find security in the assurance that 
He who preserves the unbroken order of the heavens will not fail to keep and save his people. 
The language in this verse is to be understood as addressed to the Jews sighing for deliverance 
in their long and painful captivity in Babylon. Their city and temple had laid waste for many 
years; their captivity had been long and wearisome, and doubtless many would be ready to say, 
that it would never end. To furnish an argument to meet this state of despondency, the prophet 
sets before them this sublime description of the faithfulness and the power of God. 
O Jacob - A name often given to the Jews as the descendants of Jacob. 
O Israel - Denoting the same. The name Israel was given to Jacob because he had power to 
prevail as a prince with God Gen_32:28; and it became the common name by which his 
descendants were known. 
My way is hid from the Lord - That is, is not seen, or noticed. The word ‘way’ here denotes 
evidently the state or condition; the manner of life, or the calamities which they experienced. 
The term is often thus employed to denote the lot, condition, or manner in which one lives or 
acts Psa_37:5; Isa_10:24; Jer_12:1. The phrase, ‘is hid,’ means that God is ignorant of it, or that 
he does not attend to it; and the complaint here is, that God had not regarded them in their 
calamities, and would not interpose to save them. 
And my judgment - My cause. The word here refers to their condition among the people 
where they were captive, and by whom they were oppressed. They are represented as being 
deprived of their liberty; and they here complain that God disregarded their cause, and that he 
did not come forth to deliver them from their oppressions and their trials. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
Why sayest thou, O Jacob, and speakest, O Israel,.... The Jews, supposed to 
be in captivity, are here meant, according to Jarchi and Kimchi; whom the prophet reproves, for 
murmuring at the calamities and afflictions there endured by them; but it may be the church 
and people of God, in Gospel times, are here intended, being under suffering circumstances, 
either under Rome Pagan, or Rome Papal; not only inwardly repining, but openly complaining 
and uttering, as follows: 
 
 
my way is hid from the Lord; meaning not their course of life, or their religious actions, 
their profession of the Gospel, their attendance on public worship, their prayers and other duties 
of religion; but their sufferings for his name's sake, the tribulations they endured, the afflicted 
way they walked in, which they imagined God took no notice of, since no way was opened in 
Providence for their deliverance out of them:  
 
and my judgment is passed over from my God ; my cause and case are neglected by him; 
he does not undertake my cause, nor plead it against my enemies, or right my wrongs, and 
avenge the injuries done me, or deliver me out of the hands of those that contend with me. The 
answer to which complaint follows, and which clearly shows there was no just foundation for it.
 

3. HENRY, “Here, I. The prophet reproves the people of God, who are now supposed to be 
captives in Babylon for their unbelief and distrust of God, and the dejections and despondencies 
of their spirit under their affliction (Isa_40:27): “Why sayest thou, O Jacob! to thyself and to 
those about thee, My way is hidden from the Lord? Why dost thou make hard and melancholy 
conclusions concerning thyself and thy present case as if the latter were desperate?” 1. The titles 
he here gives them were enough to shame them out of their distrusts: O Jacob! O Israel! Let 
them remember whence they took these names - from one who had found God faithful to him 
and kind in all his straits; and why they bore these names - as God's professing people, a people 
in covenant with him. 2. The way of reproving them is by reasoning with them: “Why? Consider 
whether thou hast any ground to say so.” Many of our foolish frets and foolish fears would 
vanish before a strict enquiry into the causes of them. 3. That which they are reproved for is an 
ill-natured, ill-favoured, word they spoke of God, as if he had cast them off. There seems to be an 
emphasis laid upon their saying it: Why sayest thou and speakest thou? It is bad to have evil 
thoughts rise in our mind, but it is worse to put an imprimatur - a sanction to them, and turn 
them into evil words. David reflects with regret upon what he said in his haste, when he was in 
distress. 4. The ill word they said was a word of despair concerning their present calamitous 
condition. They were ready to conclude, (1.) That God would not heed them: “My way is hidden
from the Lord; he takes no notice of our straits, nor concerns himself any more in our 
concernments. There are such difficulties in our case that even divine wisdom and power will be 
nonplussed.” A man whose way is hidden is one whom God has hedged in, Job_3:23. (2.) That 
God could not help them: “My judgment is passed over from my God; my case is past relief, so 
far past it that God himself cannot redress the grievances of it. Our bones are dried.” Eze_37:11. 
4. JAMISON, “Since these things are so, thou hast no reason to think that thine interest 
(“way,” that is, condition, Psa_37:5; Jer_12:1) is disregarded by God. 
judgment is passed over from — rather, “My cause is neglected by my God; He passes by
my case in my bondage and distress without noticing it.” 
my God — who especially might be expected to care for me. 
 
5. K&D, “
Such of the Israelites are required first of all to be brought to a consciousness of the 
folly of idolatry are not called Israel at all, because they place themselves on a part with the 
go
y
ı̄m. But now the prophet addresses those of little faith, who nevertheless desire salvation; those 
who are cast down, but not in utter despair. “Why sayest thou, O Jacob, and speakest, O Israel,
My way is hidden from Jehovah, and my right is overlooked by my God?” The name Jacob 
stands here at the head, as in 
Isa_29:22, as being the more exquisite name, and the one which 
more immediately recalled their patriarchal ancestor. They fancied that Jehovah had completely 
turned away from them in wrath and weariness. “My way” refers to their thorny way of life; “my 
right” (
oOHxC tSı̄) to their good right, in opposition to their oppressors. Of all this He appeared to 
take no notice at all. He seemed to have no thought of vindicating it judicially (on the double 
min, away from him, see Ges. §154, 3, c). 
 
 

6. CALVIN, “27.Why wilt thou say? The Prophet now expostulates either with the Jews, because they
were almost overcome by despair, and did not look to the promises of God, by which they ought, to have
supported their minds; or he makes provision for posterity, that they may not sink under any distresses
however long continued. The verbs are in the future sense, which might also be explained by the
subjunctive mood, Why wouldst thou say? For Isaiah justly infers front the preceding statement, that the
chosen people, whatever may happen, ought to wait patiently for God, till he give assistance in due time.
He argues from the less to the greater: “ God keeps every part of the world under his authority, it is
impossible that he shall forsake his Church.” Yet it is probable that at that time there were heard among
the people complaints, by which they murmured against God, as if he did not care about their salvation,
or were slow in rendering assistance, or even shut his eyes and did not see their distresses. The fault
which is now corrected is, that they thought that God did not care about them; as usually happens in
afflictions, in which we think that God has forsaken us, and exposed us for a prey, and that he takes no
concern about the affairs of this world. (128)

O Jacob and Israel! By these names he calls to their remembrance the Lord’ covenant, which had been
ratified by promises so numerous and so diversified; as if he had said, “ thou not think that thou art that
people which God hath chosen peculiarly for himself? Why dost thou imagine that he who cannot deceive
does not attend to thy cause?”

My way is hidden from Jehovah. He employs the word way for “” and ‘” and hidden, for “” or “” for if God
delay his assistance for a short time, we think that his care does not extend to us. Some explain it
differently, that is, that the people are here reproved for thinking that they would not be punished for
sinning, and they think that this sentiment resembles such as, “ wicked man hath said in his heart, There
is no God.” (Psa_14:1.) But the Prophets meaning unquestionably was, “ thou, O Israel, that the Lord
taketh no concern about thine affairs?” For he exclaims against the distrust of the people, and chides
them sharply, that he may afterwards comfort them, and may show that the Lord will continually assist his
people whom he hath undertaken to defend.

And my judgment passeth away from my God. The word judgment confirms our interpretation of the
preceding clause; for “” is implored in affliction, when we are unjustly oppressed, or when any one does
us wrong; and God is said to favor and undertake “” or “ right,” when, after having known our cause, he
defends and guards us; and he is said to pass by it, when he overlooks us, and permits us to be
devoured by our enemies. It is as if he had said, that the Jews act unjustly in complaining that God has
disregarded their cause and forsaken them; and by that reproof he prepares them for receiving
consolation, for they could not receive it while their minds were occupied with wicked or foolish thoughts.
It was therefore necessary first to remove obstructions, and to open up the way for consolation.



(128) “Et qu’ ne se soucie des choses de ce monde.”

8. SBC, “I. Isaiah here reaches and rests upon the very foundations of the faith, trust, and hope 
of mankind—the living God. Creation rests on His hand; man, the child of the higher creation, 
rests on His heart. What His power is to the material universe His moral nature and character 
are to the spiritual universe. This is the one ultimate answer of the Bible to all the questions 
which perplex and bewilder the intellect of man, the one solution of the mysteries which baffle 

his heart. "Have faith in God." Creation lives by faith unconsciously, and all her voices to our 
intelligent ear iterate and reiterate, "Have faith in God." 
II. Have faith in God. What do we know of God that we should trust Him? what aspects does He 
present to us? We have two sources of knowledge—what He has said to, and what He has done 
for, man. (1) There is something unspeakably sublime in the appeal in Isa_40:26. It is heaven’s 
protest against man’s despair. Nor is Isaiah the only sacred writer who utters it. There is 
something very strikingly parallel in Job. And in both cases God’s appeal is to the grand and 
steadfast order of the vast universe, which He sustains and assures (read Job xxxviii.). God tells 
us, if words can tell, that all the hosts of heaven are attendant on the fortunes of mankind. They 
all live that God’s deep purpose concerning man may be accomplished. (2) God declares here 
that we are not only involved inextricably in the fulfilment of His deepest and most cherished 
counsels, but that we are needed to satisfy the yearnings of His Father’s heart. 
III. We may apply these principles to the seasons of our experience when faith in the living God 
is the one thing which stands between us and the most blank despair. (1) The deep waters of 
personal affliction. (2) The weary search of the intellect for truth, the struggle to comprehend 
the incomprehensible, to know the inscrutable, to see the invisible, which is part, and not the 
least heavy part, of the discipline of a man and of mankind. (3) Dark crises of human history, 
when truth, virtue, and manhood seem perishing from the world. 
J. Baldwin Brown, Aids to the Development of the Divine Life, No. 9. 
References: Isa_40:27-29.—E. L. Hull, Sermons, 1st series, p. 81. Isa_40:27-31.—Homiletic
Magazine, vol. vii., p. 136. Isa_40:28.—Parker, Cavendish Pulpit, p. 269. 
 
 
Isaiah 40:27-29 
 
Notice:— 
I. Isaiah’s despondency. It arose from a twofold source. (1) The sense of a Divine desertion: "My 
way is hid from the Lord." (2) The absence of Divine recompense: "My judgment is passed over 
from my God." 
II. The truth that removed Isaiah’s despondency. (1) The greatness of God in nature. (2) The 
tenderness of the revealed will. 
III. The results of its removal. (1) Strength in weakness. (2) Immortal youth. 
E. L. Hull, Sermons, 1st series, p. 94. 
 


9. CHARLES SIMEON, “. Why sayest thou, O Jacob, and speakest, O Israel, My way is hid from the Lord, 
and my judgment is passed over from my God? Hast thou not known, hast thou not heard, that the 
everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary? there is no 
searching of his understanding. He giveth power to the faint; and to them that have no might he 
increaseth strength. Even the youths shall faint and be weary, and the young men shall utterly fall: but 
they that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they 
shall run and not be weary; and they shall walk, and not faint. 

 
THE human mind is prone to extremes. Before a man comes to the knowledge of himself, he is filled with
presumption, and accounts himself as safe as if there were no judgments denounced against him: but,
when he begins to feel his guilt and helplessness, he is ready to run into the opposite extreme of
despondency, and to account his state as irremediable, as if there were not a promise in the Bible suited
to his condition. Such were the feelings of the Jews before their captivity in Babylon, and under the
pressure of the troubles which they experienced in their bondage. The prophet, by anticipation, views
them us already in Babylon, and reproves the desponding apprehensions which there depressed their
souls.

The words I have read, will afford me a fit occasion to set before you,

I. The discouragements which the Lord’s people suffer—

It is really no uncommon thing for even pious souls to utter the complaint mentioned in my text. They do
this on a variety of occasions:

1. Under a sense of unpardoned guilt—

[Sin, which in an unenlightened state appears so small an evil, to an awakened soul appears “exceeding
sinful,” insomuch that he is ready to imagine it can never be forgiven. Hear David under these distressing
apprehensions: “O Lord, rebuke me not in thy wrath, neither chasten me in thy hot displeasure! for thine
arrows stick fast in me, and thy hand presseth me sore. There is no soundness in my flesh, because of
thine anger; neither is there any rest in my bones, because of my sin. For mine iniquities are gone over
mine head; as an heavy burthen, they are too heavy for me [Note: Psa_38:1?4.].” Even good men will, at
times, adopt the language of Cain: “Mine iniquity is greater than can be forgiven [Note: Gen_4:13. See
the marginal version.].” Nor is this to be wondered at: for when we view sin with all its aggravations, and
especially as committed against the love of Christ and the strivings of his good Spirit, it does assume a
character most odious, and justly deserving of God’s heaviest indignation.]

2. Under the assaults of indwelling corruption—

[These continue long after a man is turned to the Lord. They have indeed received a check; but often, like
water obstructed by a dam, they rise and swell the more for the opposition that is made to them. St.
Paul’s experience in this respect has kept thousands from utter despondency. How bitterly he complains
of “the law in his members warring against the law of his mind, and bringing him into captivity to the law of
sin that was in his members!’” From hence, like a man bound with chains to a lothesome carcase, from
which he cannot get loose, he cries, “O wretched man that I am, who shall deliver me from the body of
this death [Note:Rom_7:23?24.]?” He indeed saw that deliverance was laid up for him in and through
Christ. But many are driven almost to despair: their conflicts with sin and Satan are so frequent and so
violent, and sometimes, in appearance at least, so ineffectual, that they are ready to imagine that God
has given them up, and that it is in vain for them to contend any more. In this state they are strongly
tempted to say, “There is no hope: I have loved strangers; and after them will I go [Note: Jer_2:25.].”]

3. Under the pressure of long?continued afflictions—

[These will oppress and overwhelm the strongest man, if he be not succoured from above with strength
according to his day. Under these, David frequently complains, as if God had left him and forsaken him:
“Lord, why castest thou off my soul? Why hidest thou thy face from me? I am afflicted and ready to die

from my youth up: while I suffer thy terrors, I am distracted: thy fierce wrath goeth over me; thy terrors
have cut me off [Note: Psa_88:14?16.].” The patient Job [Note: Job_3:1; Job_27:2.], the pious Jeremiah
[Note: Jer_20:1?18.], the intrepid Elijah, all fainted through their troubles: the two former cursed the day of
their birth; and the latter, scarcely less excusable, prayed impatiently to God to “take away his life,” in
order to liberate him from his troubles [Note: 1Ki_19:4.]. Even the Saviour himself, in his afflictions,
adopted the language of the Psalmist, “My God, my God! why hast thou forsaken me? Why art thou so far
from helping me, and from the words of my roaring [Note: Psa_22:1.]?” And no doubt the hands of the
strongest will hang down, and the heart of the stoutest faint, if God strengthen them not to drink the cup
which men and devils concur to put into their hands.]

But it would not be thus with them, if they used aright,

II. The antidote provided for them in the Scriptures—

In the Scriptures, Jehovah is represented as ordering and overruling all things; and as being a God,

1. Of almighty power—

[There is nothing in the whole universe which did not derive its existence from his all?creating hand; nor is
any thing left to its own operations without his sovereign control. Be it either good or evil, it subsists only
through his permission; as God himself has told us: “I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace,
and create evil. I the Lord do all these things [Note: Isa_45:7.].” Even the murderers of our blessed Lord,
though perfectly free agents in all that they did, “effected only what the hand und counsel of Jehovah
himself had determined before to be done [Note: Act_4:28.].” Be it so then: our guilt lies heavy on our
souls; our corruptions work with almost irresistible force; our troubles of divers kinds threaten utterly to
destroy us: but is there no power able to deliver? Cannot He who created all things by a word, and spake
them into existence, accomplish for us whatever our necessities require? “Is his ear heavy, that he cannot
hear; or his arm shortened, that he cannot save [Note: Isa_59:1.]?” Were we left to the uncontrolled
power of our spiritual enemies, we might well despair: but whilst God is seated on his throne, we need
never fear but that he will interpose for our relief, if only we cast our care on him. “If we cast our burthen
upon him, he will sustain us.”]

2. Of unerring wisdom—

[Because God does not exert his Almighty power for us at the first moment that we implore his aid, we
suppose “that our way is hid from him, and our judgment is passed over from him,” or, in other words, that
he has utterly cast us off. But we forget that he has gracious designs to accomplish; and that he
accomplishes them in ways of which we have no conception, and which appear calculated only to defeat
his ends. We measure his wisdom by the scanty line of our own reason; forgetting that “his ways are in
the great deep,” and “past finding out” by any finite intelligence: that “there is no searching of his
understanding.” Now let this be considered: let the afflicted saint contemplate Jehovah as ordering and
overruling every thing for the good of his people and for the glory of his own name; let him say, ‘I have
cried long, and not been heard: but perhaps the purposes of Jehovah are not yet ripe for
accomplishment: there is more of humiliation to be produced in my soul; more of a preparation of mind for
discerning; of his mighty hand; more depression to be caused in order to a more glorious exaltation.’ Let
him recollect the ways in which Joseph’s dreams were realized; and bear in mind, that the same God
sitteth at the helm, and directs the vessel amidst all the storms, “the very storms and winds all fulfilling his
sovereign will and pleasure.” This were abundantly sufficient to compose the mind under the most
afflictive circumstances that can be imagined: for where there is unerring wisdom to direct, and Almighty

power to execute, no difficulty can exist, which shall not be overruled for good [Note:Rom_8:28.].]

But let the text declare,

III. The happy state of those who duly improve this antidote—

To wait on God in prayer is necessary, in order to the obtaining of help from him—

[He has said that “he will be inquired of, in order that he may do for us the things that he has promised
[Note: Eze_36:37.].” This is indispensable in every view: for without it there would be no acknowledgment
of him on our part, nor any readiness to give him glory, when he had interposed for our relief. Nor is it
only in a way of importunity that we are to wait upon him, but in a way of humble dependence also, and of
meek submission to his will. We must leave every thing to his all?wise disposal; “tarrying his leisure,” and
“waiting his time, however long the vision may be delayed [Note: Hab_2:3.].” “He that believeth must not
make haste [Note:Isa_28:16.].”]

To all who comply with this requisite, the most effectual relief is secured—

[It is God’s delight to succour his people in the time of need: “He giveth power to the faint, and to them
that have no might he increaseth strength.” This, I say, is his habit and delight: and one great end of his
delaying the communication! of his aid is, to make men more sensible of their dependence on him, and
more thankful for his gracious interpositions. Till he vouchsafe his answers to prayer, all human efforts are
vain; “even the youths will faint and be weary; and the young men, how strong soever they imagine
themselves to be, will utterly fall:” but “they that wait upon the Lord will renew their strength.” Like the
eagle, when moulting, they may be greatly reduced; but in due season, like him, with his renovated
plumage, they shall soar on high, above all the trials and temptations with which they have been
oppressed. Their course may be yet long and difficult; the opposition which they may have to encounter
may be exceeding violent; but, through the Divine aid, “they shall run and not be weary; they shall march 
onward [Note: Bishop Lowth’s translation.], and not faint.”]

Address—

1. In a way of tender expostulation—

[Such a state of mind as God’s people of old indulged, is approved by many, as characteristic of humility.
But it is a mark of pride rather, and of unbelief; and it is calculated only to excite God’s heavy displeasure.
This appears from the manner in which it is here reproved. In fact, it argues a forgetfulness of all our
principles as men acknowledging a Supreme Being. Have we not known, that there is a God who
ordereth all things both in heaven and in earth? Have we not heard, that “without him not so much as a
sparrow falleth to the ground?” How then can we imagine that he is inattentive to his suffering or
conflicting people, or that he is at a loss for means whereby to effect their deliverance? Have we not
heard that “he has given us his only dear Son to die for us? What, then, will he withhold from those who
seek him?” Still further; Have we not heard that “he has made with us an everlasting covenant, a
covenant ordered in all things and sure?” And is not a supply of all our wants there provided for? Be
ashamed, then, my Brethren, that, with such principles, you can give way to any disquietude. You have
only to “commit yourselves, and all your concerns, into his hands; and be sure that he will bring to pass”
whatever shall eventually advance your best interests.]

2. In a way of affectionate encouragement—

[See to what all your fears are really owing. The pious Asaph was harassed with them, like you: but, on
reflection, he said, “This is mine infirmity [Note: Psa_77:7?10.]” — — — Be assured, that not all the
powers of earth or hell can prevail against you, if only, in the exercise of faith and patience, you wait on
God. Take courage, then, and call yourselves to an account, as David did, for such unworthy fears and
such unhallowed depression: “Why art thou cast down, O my soul! and why art thou disquieted within
me? Hope thou in God: for I shall yet praise Him, who is the health of my countenance and my God
[Note: Psa_42:5; Psa_42:11;Psa_43:5.].” If you need some specific promise for your support, take that
which God has given to such as are in your very state: “Fear thou not, for I am with thee; be not
dismayed, for I am thy God: I will strengthen thee, yea, I will help thee, yea, I will uphold thee with the
right hand of my righteousness [Note: Isa_41:10.].” Rest on this, and you shall soon add your testimony to
that of David: “I waited patiently for the Lord, and he inclined unto me, and heard my cry. He brought me
up also out of an horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock, and ordered my goings:
and he hath put a new song into my mouth, even praise and thanksgiving to my God [Note: Psa_40:1?
3.].”]


 
 
 
28 Do you not know? 
    Have you not heard? 
The Lord is the everlasting God, 
    the Creator of the ends of the earth. 
He will not grow tired or weary, 
    and his understanding no one can fathom. 
 
1.BARNES, “Hast thou not known? - This is the language of the prophet reproving them 
for complaining of being forsaken and assuring them that God was faithful to his promises. This 
argument of the prophet, which continues to the close of the chapter, comprises the main scope 
of the chapter, which is to induce them to put confidence in God, and to believe that he was able 
and willing to deliver them. The phrase, ‘Hast thou not known? refers to the fact that the Jewish 

people had had an abundant opportunity of learning, in their history, and from their fathers, the 
true character of God, and his entire ability to save them. No people had had so much light on 
this subject, and now that they were in trial, they ought to recall their former knowledge of his 
character, and remember his dealings of faithfulness with them and their fathers. It is well for 
the people of God in times of calamity and trial to recall to their recollection his former dealings 
with his church. That history will furnish abundant sources of consolation, and abundant 
assurances that their interests are safe in his hands. 
Hast thou not heard? - From the traditions of the fathers; the instruction which you have 
received from ancient times. A large part of the knowledge of the Jews was traditionary; and 
these attributes of God, as a faithful God, had, no doubt, constituted an important part of the 
knowledge which had thus been communicated to them. 
The everlasting God - The God who has existed from eternity, unlike the idols of the pagan. 
If he was from eternity, he would be unchangeable, and his purposes could not fail. 
The Creator of the ends of the earth - The phrase, ‘the ends of the earth,’ means the 
same as the earth itself. The earth is sometimes spoken of as a vast plain having limits or 
boundaries (see Isa_40:22). It is probable that this was the prevailing idea among the ancients 
(compare Deu_33:17; 1Sa_2:10; Psa_19:6; Psa_22:27; Psa_48:10; Psa_65:5; Psa_67:7; 
Psa_98:3; Isa_43:6; Isa_45:22; Isa_52:10). The argument here is, that he who has formed the 
earth could not be exhausted or weary in so small a work as that of protecting his people. 
Fainteth not - Is not fatigued or exhausted. That God, who has formed and sustained all 
things, is not exhausted in his powers, but is able still to defend and guard his people. 
There is no searching of his understanding - The God who made all things must be 
infinitely wise. There is proof of boundless skill in the works of his hands, and it is impossible 
for finite mind fully and adequately to search out all the proofs of his wisdom and skill. Man can 
see only a part - a small part, while the vast ocean, the boundless deep of his wisdom, lies still 
unexplored. This thought is beautifully expressed by Zophar in Job_11:7-9 : 
Canst thou by searching find out God? 
Canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection? 
It is as high as heaven; 
What canst thou do? 
Deeper than hell; 
What canst thou know: 
The measure thereof is longer than the earth, 
And broader than the sea. 
The argument here is, that that God who has made all things, must be intimately acquainted 
with the needs of his people. They had, therefore, no reason to complain that their way was 
hidden from the Lord, and their cause passed over by him. Perhaps, also, it is implied, that as 
his understanding was vast, they ought not to expect to be able to comprehend the reason of all 
his doings; but should expect that there would be much that was mysterious and unsearchable. 
The reasons of his doings are often hid from his people; and their consolation is to be found in 
the assurance that he is infinitely wise, and that he who rules over the universe must know what 
is best, and cannot err. 
 
 

2. CLARKE, “There is no searching of his understanding “And that his 
understanding is unsearchable” - Twenty-four MSS., two editions, the Septuagint and 
Vulgate, read ןיאו  veein, with the conjunction ו  vau. 
 
 
3. GILL, “
Hast thou not known? hast thou not heard?.... From the history of the church 
in all ages; from the experience of all good men; from their own knowledge and observation; 
from the Scriptures, and the prophets, the interpreters of them; both that what is before 
suggested is wrong, and that what follows is true,  
 
that the everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth 
not, neither is weary? or, "the God of the world"; that has made it, and upholds it, and 
governs it, and judges righteously in it; who is from everlasting to everlasting, unchangeably the 
same; whose name alone is Jehovah, the self-existent and all comprehending Being, the Maker 
and Former of all things; who has not only created the earth, and the foundations of it, as the 
Targum, or the continent, and the habitable part of the world, that is most known and dwelt in, 
but even the extremities of the earth; and therefore knows and will take care of his own people, 
let them be where they will: and though the work of creation, and of upholding creatures in their 
beings, and of governing the world, and providing for all in it, and of taking care of his church 
and people in particular, requires so much power, as well as wisdom, yet he never sinks under it, 
nor is weary of it; wherefore they have no reason to give way to such unbelief and despondency, 
as above expressed:  
 
there is no searching of his understanding; it is infinite, it reaches to all persons and 
things, and therefore he cannot be at a loss to provide for his people, or plead their cause; nor 
can their case be unknown to him, or he want either power or skill to help them. 
 
4. JAMISON, “
known — by thine own observation and reading of Scripture.  
heard — from tradition of the fathers. 
everlasting, etc. — These attributes of Jehovah ought to inspire His afflicted people with 
confidence. 
no searching of his understanding — therefore thy cause cannot, as thou sayest, escape 
His notice; though much in His ways is unsearchable, He cannot err (
Job_11:7-9). He is never 
“faint” or “weary” with having the countless wants of His people ever before Him to attend to. 
 
 
5. K&D, “
The groundlessness of such despondency is set before them in a double question. “Is
it not known to thee, or hast thou not heard, an eternal God is Jehovah, Creator of the ends of
the earth: He fainteth not, neither becomes weary; His understanding is unsearchable.” Those 
who are so desponding ought to know, if not from their own experience, at least from 
information that had been handed down, that Jehovah, who created the earth from one end to 
the other, so that even Babylonian was not beyond the range of His vision or the domain of His 
power, was an eternal God, i.e., a God eternally the same and never varying, who still possessed 
and manifested the power which He had displayed in the creation. Israel had already passed 
through a long history, and Jehovah had presided over this, and ruled within it; and He had not 

so lost His power in consequence, as to have now left His people to themselves. He does not 
grow faint, as a man would do, who neglected to take the repeated nourishment requisite to 
sustain the energy of his vital power; nor does He become weary, like a man who has exhausted 
his capacity for work by over-exertion. And if He had not redeemed His people till then, His 
people were to know that His course was pure 
t
e
vxums tx or understanding, which was in the 
possession of infallible criteria for determining the right point of time at which to interpose with 
His aid. 
 
 
7. CALVIN, “28.Hast thou not known? He repeats the same statement which he had formerly made,
that the people who had been carefully taught in the school of God were inexcusable for their
slothfulness, and chides them sharply for not having profited more by the doctrine of the Law, and by the
other means which God had bestowed in addition to that knowledge which they possessed in common
with the Gentiles. The word know, which is more general, is put first; because by many miracles and other
proofs God had manifested his glory. Next, he asks, Hast thou not heard? As if he had said, “ thou hast
profited nothing by being taught by actions and by word that God is never unemployed, it is evident that
thou are excessively unteachable.”

That Jehovah is the God of eternity. The Prophet calls him “” and thus distinguishes him from all idols,
which endure but for a time, and were made by men; and truly, if this were deeply seated in our hearts,
there would no longer be any room for distrust; for if God is eternal, he never changes or decays, eternity
being uniformly attended by this quality, that it is never liable to change, but always remains the same.
Since the Jews did not sufficiently believe these things, though they had often “” them, the Prophet
intended to arouse them by this reproof, in order to shew that they will be doubly guilty before God, if,
after having been taught both by his numerous benefits, and by the word, they do not render the honor
and glory which are due to him.

And is not wearied by weariness, and there is no searching of his understanding. Here the Prophet
makes two statements; first, that God is not wearied in doing good; and, secondly, that no man can
explore his wisdom. In the former clause he shews that, nothing will hinder God from continuing to
exercise his kindness; for he is not like men whose resources are exhausted by giving frequently, or who
are wearied by continually bestowing new favors, or who repent of their generosity. His kindness is never
exhausted; if he was kind to the fathers, he will be not less kind and bountiful to posterity. As to the
allegation, that God very often acts differently from what we think to be best for us, the Prophet meets it
by saying that his purpose is incomprehensible, and warns us that we ought not to murmur, though he
does not all at once comply with our wishes; because nothing is better adapted to cherish our hope than
this sobriety, which leads us to consider how marvellously God works in preserving us, and thus to submit
to his secret counsel.  
 
 
29 He gives strength to the weary 

    and increases the power of the weak. 
 
1.BARNES, “He giveth power to the faint - To his weak and feeble people. This is one of 
his attributes; and his people, therefore, should put their trust in him, and look to him for aid 
(compare 
2Co_12:9). The design of this verse is to give consolation to the afflicted and down-
trodden people in Babylon, by recalling to their minds the truth that it was one of the 
characteristics of God that he ministered strength to those who were conscious of their own 
feebleness, and who looked to him for support. It is a truth, however, as applicable to us as to 
theresa truth inestimably precious to those who feel that they are weak and feeble, and who look 
to God for aid. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
He giveth power to the faint,.... Who are ready to faint under afflictions, because 
they have not immediate deliverance, or their prayers are not answered at once, or promises not 
fulfilled as they expected; to such he gives fresh supplies of spiritual strength; he strengthens 
their faith, and enlarges their views, to behold the goodness of the Lord in the land of the living, 
and confirms his blessings and promises of grace unto them, 
Psa_27:13. The Targum is,  
 
"who giveth wisdom to the righteous that breathe after the words of the law:''  
 
and to them that have no might he increaseth strength; not that they have no might at 
all, strictly speaking; for then it could not be properly said their strength was increased by him; 
but that their might and power were very small, and that in their own apprehensions they had 
none, and then it is that fresh strength is given them; as the apostle says, "when I am weak, then 
am I strong"; 2Co_12:10, though this may be understood, not of the strength of their graces, but 
of their sins and corruptions: a word from the same root as this here used signifies "iniquity"; 
and the sense may be, that the Lord increases the spiritual strength of such on whom the lust's, 
corruptions, and virtuosity of nature have not the power and dominion (e).  
 
 
3. HENRY, “
He gives strength and power to his people, and helps them by enabling them to 
help themselves. He that is the strong God is the strength of Israel. (1.) He can help the weak, 
Isa_40:29. Many a time he gives power to the faint, to those that are ready to faint away; and to
those that have no might he not only gives, but increases strength, as there is more and more 
occasion for it. Many out of bodily weakness are wonderfully recovered, and made strong, by the 
providence of God: and many that are feeble in spirit, timorous and faint-hearted, unfit for 
services and sufferings, are yet strengthened by the grace of God with all might in the inward
man. To those who are sensible of their weakness, and ready to acknowledge they have no 
might, God does in a special manner increase strength; for, when we are weak in ourselves, 
then are we strong in the Lord.
 

4. JAMISON, “He gives strength and power to his people, and helps them by enabling them to 
help themselves. He that is the strong God is the strength of Israel. (1.) He can help the weak, 
Isa_40:29. Many a time he gives power to the faint, to those that are ready to faint away; and to
those that have no might he not only gives, but increases strength, as there is more and more 
occasion for it. Many out of bodily weakness are wonderfully recovered, and made strong, by the 
providence of God: and many that are feeble in spirit, timorous and faint-hearted, unfit for 
services and sufferings, are yet strengthened by the grace of God with all might in the inward
man. To those who are sensible of their weakness, and ready to acknowledge they have no 
might, God does in a special manner increase strength; for, when we are weak in ourselves, 
then are we strong in the Lord.
 
 
5. K&D, “
Jehovah is so far from becoming faint, that it is He who gives strength to the fainting. 
“Giving power to the faint, and to the incapable He giveth strength in abundance.” 
ם ִינוֹא ןי ֵא ְל is 
equivalent to םינוֹא ןיא 3ְרשׁאל ןי ֵא is used exactly like a privative to form a negative adjective (e.g., 
Psa_88:5; Pro_25:3). 
 
 
6. CALVIN, “29.He giveth power to the faint. The Prophet now applies to the present subject the
general statements which he made; for we have said that his intention was to give warmer
encouragement to the people, and to lead them to cherish better hope. Because the Jews were at that
time weakened and destitute of all strength, he shews that on this account it belongs to God to give
assistance to those who were thus exhausted and weakened. He therefore magnifies the power of God
on this ground, that they may conclude and believe that they ought not to doubt of their salvation so long
as they enjoy his favor. It was indeed to the people who were held captive in Babylon that the Prophet
looked; but we ought also to apply this doctrine to ourselves, that whenever our strength shall fail, and we
shall be almost laid low, we may call to remembrance that the Lord stretches out his hand ‘ the faint,” who
are sinking through the want of all help. But first, we must feel our faintness and poverty, that the saying
of Paul, “ power of God is made perfect in our weakness,” (2Co_12:9,) may be fulfilled; for if our hearts
are not deeply moved by a conviction of our weakness, we cannot receive seasonable assistance from
God.  
 
 
30 Even youths grow tired and weary, 
    and young men stumble and fall; 
 

1.BARNES, “Even the youths shall faint - The most vigorous young men, those in whom 
we expect manly strength, and who are best suited to endure hardy toil. They become weary by 
labor. Their powers are soon exhausted. The design here is, to contrast the most vigorous of the 
human race with God, and to show that while all their powers fail, the power of God is 
unexhausted and inexhaustible. 
And the young men - The word used here denotes properly “those who are chosen or 
selected” (םירוּחב  v exut_OMo, Greek ~κλεκτο{  eklektoi), and may be applied to those who were 
selected or chosen for any hazardous enterprise, or dangerous achievement in war; those who 
would be selected for vigor or activity. The meaning is, that the most chosen or select of the 
human family - the most vigorous and manly, must be worn down by fatigue, or paralyzed by 
sickness or death; but that the powers of God never grow weary, and that those who trust in him 
should never become faint. 
 
 
2. GILL, “
Even the youths shall faint and be weary,.... Such as are in the prime of their 
strength, and glory in it, yet through the hand of God upon them, by one disease or another, 
their strength is weakened in the way; or they meet with that which they are not equal to, and 
sink under, and are discouraged, and obliged to desist. Some think the Babylonians and 
Chaldeans are here meant, the enemies of Israel, and by whom they were carried captive. The 
Targum interprets this clause, as well as the following, of wicked and ungodly men; and so do 
Jarchi and Kimchi: it may be applied to the Heathen emperors, who persecuted the church of 
God, and were smitten by him, and found it too hard a work to extirpate Christianity out of the 
world, which they thought to have done; and also to all the antichristian states, who have given 
their power and strength to the beast: 
 
 
and the young men shall utterly fail; or, "falling shall fall" 
(f); stumble and fall, die and 
perish; or, however, not be able to perform their enterprise.  
 
3. HENRY, “
He will help the willing, will help those who, in a humble dependence upon him, 
help themselves, and will do well for those who do their best, 
Isa_40:30, Isa_40:31. Those who 
trust to their own sufficiency, and are so confident of it that they neither exert themselves to the 
utmost nor seek unto God for his grace, are the youth and the young men, who are strong, but 
are apt to think themselves stronger than they are. And they shall faint and be weary, yea, they 
shall utterly fail in their services, in their conflicts, and under their burdens; they shall soon be 
made to see the folly of trusting to themselves. But those that wait on the Lord, who make 
conscience of their duty to him, and by faith rely upon him and commit themselves to his 
guidance, shall find that God will not fail them. [1.] They shall have grace sufficient for them: 
They shall renew their strength as their work is renewed, as there is new occasion; they shall be 
anointed, and their lamps supplied, with fresh oil. God will be their arm every morning, 
Isa_33:2. If at any time they have been foiled and weakened they shall recover themselves, and 
so renew their strength. Heb. They shall change their strength, as their work is changed - doing 
work, suffering work; they shall have strength to labour, strength to wrestle, strength to resist, 
strength to bear. As the day so shall the strength be. [2.] They shall use this grace for the best 
purposes. Being strengthened, First, They shall soar upward, upward towards God: They shall
mount up with wings like eagles, so strongly, so swiftly, so high and heaven-ward. In the 

strength of divine grace, their souls shall ascend above the world, and even enter into the holiest. 
Pious and devout affections are the eagles' wings on which gracious souls mount up, Psa_25:1. 
Secondly, They shall press forward, forward towards heaven. They shall walk, they shall run, the 
way of God's commandments, cheerfully and with alacrity (they shall not be weary), constantly 
and with perseverance (they shall not faint); and therefore in due season they shall reap. Let 
Jacob and Israel therefore, in their greatest distresses, continue waiting upon God, and not 
despair of timely and effectual relief and succour from him. 
 
 
4. JAMISON, “
young men — literally, “those selected”; men picked out on account of their 
youthful vigor for an enterprise. 
 
 
5. K&D, “
Faith is all that is needed to ensure a participation in the strength (
ה ָמ ְצ ָע after the form 
ה ָמ ְכ ָח), which He so richly bestows and so powerfully enhances. “And youths grow faint and
weary, and young men suffer a fall. But they who wait for Jehovah gain fresh strength; lift up
their wings like eagles; run, and are not weary; go forward, and do not faint.” Even youths, 
even young men in the early bloom of their morning of life (
bachurı̄m, youths, from 
3ַח ָEר, related 
to ר ַכ ָE, רַג ָE), succumb to the effects of the loss of sustenance or over-exertion (both futures are 
defective, the first letter being dropped), and any outward obstacle is sufficient to cause them to 
fall (ל ַשׁ ְכִנ with inf. abs. kal, which retains what has been stated for contemplation, according to 
Ges. §131, 3, Anm. 2). In Isa_40:30 the verb stands first, Isa_40:30 being like a concessive 
clause in relation to Isa_40:31. “Even though this may happen, it is different with those who 
wait for Jehovah,” i.e., those who believe in Him; for the Old Testament applies to faith a 
number of synonyms denoting trust, hope, and longing, and thus describes it according to its 
inmost nature, as fiducia and as hope, directed to the manifestation and completion of that 
which is hoped for. The Vav cop. introduces the antithesis, as in Isa_40:8. ףי ִל ֱח ֶה, to cause one to 
pursue, or new to take the place of the old (Lat. recentare). The expression וגו וּל ֲע ַי is supposed by 
early translators, after the Sept., Targ. Jer., and Saad., to refer to the moulting of the eagle and 
the growth of the new feathers, which we meet with in Psa_103:5 (cf., Mic_1:16) as a figurative 
representation of the renewal of youth through grace. But Hitzig correctly observes that ה ָל ֱע ֶה is 
never met with as the causative of the kal used in Isa_5:6, and moreover that it would require 
ה ָצוֹנ instead of ר ֶב ֵא. The proper rendering therefore is, “they cause their wings to rise, or lift their 
wings high, like the eagles” (
'ebher as in 
Psa_55:7). Their course of life, which has Jehovah for its 
object, is as it were possessed of wings. They draw from Him strength upon strength (see 
Psa_84:8); running does not tire them, nor do they become faint from going ever further and 
further.  
The first address, consisting of three parts (Isa_40:1-11, Isa_40:12-26, Isa_40:27-31), is here 
brought to a close. 
 
 

6. CALVIN, “30.The youths are wearied and faint. By this comparison the Prophet illustrates more
powerfully what he had formerly said, that the strength which God imparts to his elect is invincible and
unwearied; for men’ strength easily fails, but God’ strength never fails. It is indeed certain that all the vigor
which naturally dwells in us proceeds from God; but since men claim as their own what God has
bestowed generally on all, the Prophet thus distinguishes between the strength of men which appears to
be born with them, and that strength by which God peculiarly supports his elect; for God’ kindness, which
is diffused throughout all nature, is not sufficiently perceived. And thus by “’ strength” he means that
which is generally possessed by mankind, and by “’ assistance,”he means that by which he peculiarly
assists us after our strength has failed; for the Prophet speaks of the grace of God which is cormmonly
called supernatural, and says that it is perpetual, while men can have nothing in themselves but what is
fading and transitory; that by this mark he may distinguish between the Church of God and the rest of the
world, and between spiritual grace and earthly prosperity.

And the young men by falling fall. In the former clause he made use of the word םירענ, (negnarim,) 
youths, but now he adds םירחב, (bachurim,) which means not only that they were “ men,” but also that
they had been selected. (129) The repetition of the same statement may be supposed to refer particularly
to age, though he means that they were persons of the choicest vigor and in the prime of life. With this
design he recommends that excellent privilege which God bestows on his children in preference to other
men; that they may be satisfied with their lot, and may bear no envy to earthly men, (130) for that strength
of which they boast. In a word, he shews that men are greatly deceived if they are puffed up by
confidence in their own strength, for they immediately sink and faint.

He appears to allude to what happens every day, that the stronger any person is, the more boldly does he
attempt what is exceedingly difficult, and the consequence is, that they who are naturally more robust
seldom live to be old men. They think nothing too hard or difficult, they attempt everything, and rashly
encounter all dangers; but they give way in the middle of their course, and suffer the punishment of their
rashness. The same thing befalls those who are proud of any gift which God has bestowed on them, and
are full of confidence in themselves; for all that they have received from God is reduced to nothing, or
rather turns to their ruin and destruction; and thus they are justly punished for their insolence.



(129) “ in full vigor, picked men, in military language.” —Stock. 

(130) “Aux enfans de ce monde.” “ the children of this world.”  
 
 
31 but those who hope in the Lord 
    will renew their strength. 
They will soar on wings like eagles; 

    they will run and not grow weary, 
    they will walk and not be faint. 
 
1.BARNES, “But they that wait upon the Lord - The word rendered ‘wait upon’ here 
(from 
הוק  " tg tx), denotes properly to wait, in the sense of expecting. The phrase, ‘to wait on 
Yahweh,’ means to wait for his help; that is, to trust in him, to put our hope or confidence in 
him. It is applicable to those who are in circumstances of danger or want, and who look to him 
for his merciful interposition. Here it properly refers to those who were suffering a long and 
grievous captivity in Babylon, and who had no prospect of deliverance but in him. The phrase is 
applicable also to all who feel that they are weak, feeble, guilty, and helpless, and who, in view of 
this, put their trust in Yahweh. The promise or assurance here is general in its nature, and is as 
applicable to his people now as it was in the times of the captivity in Babylon. Religion is often 
expressed in the Scriptures by ‘waiting on Yahweh,’ that is, by looking to him for help, expecting 
deliverance through his aid, putting trust in him (see Psa_25:3, Psa_25:5, Psa_25:21; 
Psa_27:14; Psa_37:7, Psa_37:9, Psa_37:34; Psa_69:3; compare Isa_8:17, note; Isa_30:18, 
note). 
It does not imply inactivity, or want of personal exertion; it implies merely that our hope of 
aid and salvation is in him - a feeling that is as consistent with the most strenuous endeavors to 
secure the object, as it is with a state of inactivity and indolence. Indeed, no man can wait on 
God in a proper manner who does not use the means which he has appointed for conveying to us 
his blessing. To wait on him without using any means to obtain his aid, is to tempt him; to 
expect miraculous interposition is unauthorized, and must meet with disappointment. And they 
only wait on him in a proper manner who expect his blessing in the common modes in which he 
imparts it to men - in the use of those means and efforts which he has appointed, and which he 
is accustomed to bless. The farmer who should wait for God to plow and sow his fields, would 
not only be disappointed, but would be guilty of provoking Him. And so the man who waits for 
God to do what he ought to do; to save him without using any of the means of grace, will not 
only be disappointed, but will provoke his displeasure. 
Shall renew their strength - Margin, ‘Change.’ The Hebrew word commonly means to 
change, to alter; and then to revive, to renew, to cause to flourish again, as, e. g., a tree that has 
decayed and fallen down (see the note at Isa_9:10; compare Job_14:7). Here it is evidently used 
in the sense of renewing, or causing to revive; to increase, and to restore that which is decayed. 
It means that the people of God who trust in him shall become strong in faith; able to contend 
with their spiritual foes, to gain the victory over their sins, and to discharge aright the duties, 
and to meet aright the trials of life. God gives them strength, if they seek him in the way of his 
appointment - a promise which has been verified in the experience of his people in every age. 
They shall mount up with wings as eagles - Lowth translates this ‘They shall put forth 
fresh feathers like the moulting eagle;’ and in his note on the passage remarks, that ‘it has been a 
common and popular opinion that the eagle lives and retains his vigor to a great age; and that, 
beyond the common lot of other birds, he moults in his old age, and renews his feathers, and 
with them his youth.’ He supposes that the passage in Psa_103:5, ‘So that thy youth is renewed 
like the eagles,’ refers to this fact. That this was a common and popular opinion among the 
ancients, is clearly proved by Bochart (Hieroz. ii. 2. 1. pp. 165-169). The opinion was, that at 
stated times the eagle plunged itself in the sea and cast off its old feathers, and that new feathers 

started forth, and that thus it lived often to the hundredth year, and then threw itself in the sea 
and died. In accordance with this opinion, the Septuagint renders this passage, ‘They shall put 
forth fresh feathers (πτεροφυήσουσιν  pterophuesousin) like eagles.’ Vulgate, Assument pennas
sicut aquiloe. 
The Chaldee renders it, ‘They who trust in the Lord shall be gathered from the captivity, and 
shall increase their strength, and renew their youth as a germ which grows up; upon wings of 
eagles shall they run and not be fatigued.’ But whatever may be the truth in regard to the eagle, 
there is no reason to believe that Isaiah here had any reference to the fact that it moults in its old 
age. The translation of Lowth was derived from file Septuagint, and not from the Hebrew text. 
The meaning of the Hebrew is simply, ‘they shall ascend on wings as eagles,’ or ‘they shall lift up 
the wings as eagles;’ and the image is derived from the fact that the eagle rises on the most 
vigorous wing of any bird, and ascends apparently further toward the sun. The figure, therefore, 
denotes strength and vigor of purpose; strong and manly piety; an elevation above the world; 
communion with God, and a nearness to his throne - as the eagle ascends toward the sun. 
They shall run and not be weary - This passage, also, is but another mode of expressing 
the same idea - that they who trust in God would be vigorous, elevated, unwearied; that he 
would sustain and uphold them; and that in his service they would never faint. This was at first 
designed to be applied to the Jews in captivity in Babylon to induce them to put their trust in 
God. But it is as true now as it was at that time. It has been found in the experience of thousands 
and tens of thousands, that by waiting on the Lord the heart has been invigorated; the faith has 
been confirmed; and the affections have been raised above the world. Strength has been given to 
bear trial without complaining, to engage in arduous duty without fainting, to pursue the 
perilous and toilsome journey of life without exhaustion, and to rise above the world in hope and 
peace on the bed of death. 
 
 
2. CLARKE, “
They shall mount zap with wings as eagles “They shall put forth 
fresh feathers like the moulting eagle” - It has been a common and popular opinion that 
the eagle lives and retains his vigor to a great age; and that, beyond the common lot of other 
birds, he moults in his old age, and renews his feathers, and with them his youth. “Thou shalt 
renew thy youth like the eagle, “says the psalmist, 
Psa_103:5; on which place St. Ambrose notes, 
Aquila longam aetatem ducit, dum, vetustis plumis fatiscentibus, nova pennarum successione
juvenescit: “The eagle lives to a very advanced age; and in moulting his youth is renewed with 
his new feathers.” Phile, De Animalibus, treating of the eagle, and addressing himself to the 
emperor Michael Palaeologus junior, raises his compliment upon the same notion: -  
Τουτου3συ,3βασιλευ,3τον3πολυν3ζωοις3βιον,3
Αει3νεουργων,3και3κρατυνων3την3φυσιν. 
“Long may’st thou live, O king; still like the eagle 
Renew thy youth, and still retain thy vigor.” 
To this many fabulous and absurd circumstances are added by several ancient writers and 
commentators on Scripture; see Bochart, Hieroz. 2 ii. 1. Rabbi Saadias says, Every tenth year the 
eagle flies near the sun; and when not able any longer to bear the burning heat, she falls down 
into the sea, and soon loses her feathers, and thus renews her vigor. This she does every tenth 
year till the hundredth, when, after she has ascended near the sun, and fallen into the sea, she 
rises no more. How much proof do such stories require! Whether the notion of the eagle’s 

renewing his youth is in any degree well founded or not, I need not inquire; it is enough for a 
poet, whether profane or sacred, to have the authority of popular opinion to support an image 
introduced for illustration or ornament. - L 
 
 
3. GILL, “
But they that wait upon the Lord,.... As children on their parents, to do them 
honour, to obey their commands, and receive food and blessings from them; as servants on their 
masters, to know their pleasure, do their work, and have their wages; as clients on their patrons, 
to have advice of them, put their cause into their hands, and know how it goes; and as beggars at 
the door, who knock and wait, tell their case and wait, meet with repulses, yet keep their place, 
and continue waiting: such an act supposes a knowledge and reverence of God, confidence in 
him, attendance on him, not with the body only, in public and private, but with the soul also, 
and with some degree of constancy, and with patience and quietness: the Lord is to be waited 
upon for the manifestations of himself, who sometimes hides himself, but is to be waited for, 
since he has his set time to show himself again, and his presence is worth waiting for; also for 
the performance of his promises, which may be expected from his perfections, the nature of the 
promises, and their being in Christ; likewise for answers of prayer, and for the fresh discoveries 
of pardoning grace and mercy; and as Old Testament saints waited for the first coming of Christ, 
so New Testament saints for his second coming, and for eternal glory and happiness: and such 
"shall renew their strength"; which is to be understood of spiritual! strength in the heart, and of 
the graces of the Spirit there: it supposes strength received already, which natural men have not, 
but converted men have; and yet they want more, and more they shall have; to assist them in the 
performance of duty, to enable them to resist Satan and his temptations, and the corruptions of 
nature, and to cause them to endure afflictions and persecutions patiently, and to persevere 
unto the end:  
 
they shall mount up with wings as eagles; swiftly and strongly; it is expressive of the 
motion of the affections heavenwards towards God and Christ, and things above; of the entrance 
of faith and hope within the veil, and of the exercise of these graces on Christ, who is now at the 
right hand of God; of the expectation of glory and happiness in heaven hereafter, and of present 
support under afflictions, the Lord bearing them as on eagles' wings; see 
Psa_103:5 (g):  
 
they shall run, and not be weary; in the way of God's commandments; which shows great 
affection for them, haste to obey them, delight and pleasure, cheerfulness and alacrity, therein, 
so as to be without weariness:  
 
and they shall, walk, and not faint: in the ways of God, in the name of the Lord, or in 
Christ, as they have received him; leaning on him, trusting in him, continuing to do so, till they 
receive the end of their faith, the salvation of their souls; and so shall not sink under their 
burdens, nor give out till they enjoy it; different persons, though all of them believers, may be 
here intended; particularly Christians under the Gospel dispensation, tried and exercised by 
many enemies; some shall soar aloft, and dwell on high; others, though they cannot rise and 
"fly" so swiftly and strongly, yet shall "run" without weariness; and others, though they can 
neither fly nor run, yet shall "walk" without fainting.  
 
(g) The Jews have a notion, that for ten years the eagle ascends very high in the firmament of 
heaven, and approaching near to the heat of the sun, it falls into the sea, through the vehemence 
of the heat; and then it casts its feathers, and is renewed again, and its feathers grow, and it 
returns to the days of its youth; and so every ten years to a hundred; and in the hundredth year 

it ascends according to its custom, and falls into the sea, and dies. So Ben Melech from Saadiab 
Gaon. 
 
4. HENRY, “
He will help the willing, will help those who, in a humble dependence upon him, 
help themselves, and will do well for those who do their best, 
Isa_40:30, Isa_40:31. Those who 
trust to their own sufficiency, and are so confident of it that they neither exert themselves to the 
utmost nor seek unto God for his grace, are the youth and the young men, who are strong, but 
are apt to think themselves stronger than they are. And they shall faint and be weary, yea, they 
shall utterly fail in their services, in their conflicts, and under their burdens; they shall soon be 
made to see the folly of trusting to themselves. But those that wait on the Lord, who make 
conscience of their duty to him, and by faith rely upon him and commit themselves to his 
guidance, shall find that God will not fail them. [1.] They shall have grace sufficient for them: 
They shall renew their strength as their work is renewed, as there is new occasion; they shall be 
anointed, and their lamps supplied, with fresh oil. God will be their arm every morning, 
Isa_33:2. If at any time they have been foiled and weakened they shall recover themselves, and 
so renew their strength. Heb. They shall change their strength, as their work is changed - doing 
work, suffering work; they shall have strength to labour, strength to wrestle, strength to resist, 
strength to bear. As the day so shall the strength be. [2.] They shall use this grace for the best 
purposes. Being strengthened, First, They shall soar upward, upward towards God: They shall
mount up with wings like eagles, so strongly, so swiftly, so high and heaven-ward. In the 
strength of divine grace, their souls shall ascend above the world, and even enter into the holiest. 
Pious and devout affections are the eagles' wings on which gracious souls mount up, Psa_25:1. 
Secondly, They shall press forward, forward towards heaven. They shall walk, they shall run, the 
way of God's commandments, cheerfully and with alacrity (they shall not be weary), constantly 
and with perseverance (they shall not faint); and therefore in due season they shall reap. Let 
Jacob and Israel therefore, in their greatest distresses, continue waiting upon God, and not 
despair of timely and effectual relief and succour from him. 
 
 
5. JAMISON, “
mount up — (
2Sa_1:23). Rather, “They shall put forth fresh feathers as 
eagles” are said to renovate themselves; the parallel clause, “renew their strength,” confirms 
this. The eagle was thought to molt and renew his feathers, and with them his strength, in old 
age (so the Septuagint, Vulgate, Psa_103:5). However, English Version is favored by the 
descending climax, mount up 3 run 3 walk; in every attitude the praying, waiting child of God is 
“strong in the Lord” (Psa_84:7; Mic_4:5; Heb_12:1). 
 
 
6. K&D, “
Faith is all that is needed to ensure a participation in the strength (
ה ָמ ְצ ָע after the 
form ה ָמ ְכ ָח), which He so richly bestows and so powerfully enhances. “And youths grow faint
and weary, and young men suffer a fall. But they who wait for Jehovah gain fresh strength;
lift up their wings like eagles; run, and are not weary; go forward, and do not faint.” Even 
youths, even young men in the early bloom of their morning of life (
bachurı̄m, youths, from 
ר ַח ָE, 
related to ר ַכ ָE, רַג ָE), succumb to the effects of the loss of sustenance or over-exertion (both 
futures are defective, the first letter being dropped), and any outward obstacle is sufficient to 

cause them to fall (ל ַשׁ ְכִנ with inf. abs. kal, which retains what has been stated for contemplation, 
according to Ges. §131, 3, Anm. 2). In Isa_40:30 the verb stands first, Isa_40:30 being like a 
concessive clause in relation to Isa_40:31. “Even though this may happen, it is different with 
those who wait for Jehovah,” i.e., those who believe in Him; for the Old Testament applies to 
faith a number of synonyms denoting trust, hope, and longing, and thus describes it according 
to its inmost nature, as fiducia and as hope, directed to the manifestation and completion of that 
which is hoped for. The Vav cop. introduces the antithesis, as in Isa_40:8. ףי ִל ֱח ֶה, to cause one to 
pursue, or new to take the place of the old (Lat. recentare). The expression וגו וּל ֲע ַי is supposed by 
early translators, after the Sept., Targ. Jer., and Saad., to refer to the moulting of the eagle and 
the growth of the new feathers, which we meet with in Psa_103:5 (cf., Mic_1:16) as a figurative 
representation of the renewal of youth through grace. But Hitzig correctly observes that ה ָל ֱע ֶה is 
never met with as the causative of the kal used in Isa_5:6, and moreover that it would require 
ה ָצוֹנ instead of ר ֶב ֵא. The proper rendering therefore is, “they cause their wings to rise, or lift their 
wings high, like the eagles” (
'ebher as in 
Psa_55:7). Their course of life, which has Jehovah for its 
object, is as it were possessed of wings. They draw from Him strength upon strength (see 
Psa_84:8); running does not tire them, nor do they become faint from going ever further and 
further.  
The first address, consisting of three parts (Isa_40:1-11, Isa_40:12-26, Isa_40:27-31), is here 
brought to a close. 
 
6B. NISBET, “I. Consider, first, what it is to wait upon the Lord.—Three things make it: service,
expectation, patience. ‘Wait on the Lord.’ We must be as those Eastern maidens who, as they ply their
needle or their distaff, look to the eye and wait upon the hand of their mistress, as their guide which is to
teach them, or their model which they are to copy. Our best lessons are always found in a Father’s eye.
Therefore, if you would ‘wait upon the Lord, you must be always looking out for voices—those still small
voices of the soul—and you must expect them, and you must command them. But service, however
devoted, or expectation, however intense, will not be waiting without patience. Here is where so many fail.
The waiting times are so long; the interval between the prayer and the answer, between the repentance
and the peace, between the work and the result, between sowing?time and reaping?time, and we are such
impatient, impetuous creatures. We could not ‘tarry the Lord’s leisure.’

II. Consider, next, the action: elevation, rapid progress, a steady course—soar, run, walk.—Is it not
just what we want—to get higher, to go faster, and to be more calmly consistent? (1) Elevation. What are
the wings? Beyond a doubt, faith, prayer; or, if you will, humility and confidence in a beautiful equipoise,
balancing one another on either side, so that the soul sustains itself in mid?air and flies upward. (2) ‘They
shall run.’ Have you ever noticed how the servants of God in the Bible—from Abraham and David to
Philip in the Acts—whenever they were told to do anything always ran. It is the only way to do anything
well. A thousand irksome duties become easy and pleasant if we do them runningly, that is with a ready
mind, an affectionate zeal, and a happy alacrity. (3) But there is something beyond this. It is more difficult
to walk than to run. To maintain a quiet, sustained walk, day by day, in the common things of life, in the
house and out of the house, not impulsive, not capricious, not changeable—that is the hardest thing to
do. Let me give four rules for this walk: (a) Start from Christ; (b) walk with Christ; (c) walk leaning on
Christ; (d) walk to Christ.
 
Rev. James Vaughan.

Illustration

‘In the ministry of Christian service the last is the best. It may be best with us long after the two pence are
spent, when we are spending more and more, and yet spending far more consciously than before what is
not ours by nature. The promise marks an ascent, though it may not seem to do so. “They shall mount up
on wings as eagles.” There is a better thing, “They shall run, and not be weary,” and best of all there is
this, “They shall walk, and not faint.” It is the climax of covenant grace.

So as of old I follow Him

Only another way;

When the lights of the world are growing dim,

And my heart already is singing the hymn

Of twilight grown to day.’

 
 
 7. CALVIN, “31.But they that wait for Jehovah. Hebrew writers employ the phrase, “ strength,” (131) to
denote “ new strength,” and thus “ restored.” The Prophet therefore shews, that godly persons, who shall
hope in God, will not be deficient in strength; and he confirms what he formerly said,

“ rest and silence shall be your strength.” (Isa_30:15.)

We must not become agitated, or throw ourselves forward rashly, but “” patiently. In this passage,
therefore, waiting means nothing else than patience. Violent men dash themselves to pieces by their own
eagerness, but the vigor of godly men, though it has less display, and often appears to lie buried while
they calmly “ for” God’ assistance, is refreshed and renewed. We must therefore return to the saying of
Paul, that

“ power of God is made perfect in our weakness.”

(2Co_12:9.)

We must, therefore be fully convinced of our weakness, that we may yield to the power of God. The Jews,
who were oppressed by that cruel captivity, had great need of this doctrine; but for us also, during this
wretchedly ruinous condition of the Church, it is exceedingly needful.

They shall raise their wings as eagles. It is generally believed that the Prophet uses this phrase in the
same sense that the Psalmist says,

“ youth shall be renewed like that of the eagle.”

(Psa_103:5.)

It is certain that the “” is very long?lived as compared with other birds.

Aristotle and Pliny affirm that it never dies of old age, but of hunger; that is, that when the upper part of
the beak becomes too large, it cannot take food into its mouth, and for a long time subsists entirely on
what it drinks. One Zaadias, as all Jews are audacious in constructing fables, pretends that the eagle flies
upward into the region that is near the sun, and approaches the sun so closely, that its old wings are
burned, and other new ones grow in their place; but this is utterly absurd and fabulous. The Prophet
means that they who trust in the Lord will be vigorous, like eagles, till the most advanced old age. But
seeing that eagles fly higher than other birds, by which they shew remarkable swiftness, which has also
given rise to the proverb, “ eagle among the clouds,” this passage may be understood to denote not only
long life, but also strength and agility; so that Isaiah, after having shewn that their strength is recruited,
adds that they are more vigorous, and ascend to a great height. Such is also the import of what follows,


They shall run and shall not be weary. It is as if he had said, that the Lord will assist them, so that they
shall pursue their course without any molestation. It is a figurative expression, by which he intimates that
believers (132) will always be ready to perform their duty with cheerfulness. But it will be said, “ are so
many troubles which we must endure in this life; how then does he say that we shall be exempt from
weariness?” I reply, believers are indeed distressed and wearied, but they are at length delivered from
their distresses, and feel that they have been restored by the power of God; for it happens to them
according to the saying of Paul,

“ we are troubled on every side, we are not overwhelmed; we are perplexed, but are not in despair; we
suffer persecution, but are not forsaken; we are cast down, but are not destroyed.”

(2Co_4:8.)

Let us therefore learn to flee to the Lord, who, after we have encountered many storms, will at length
conduct us to the harbor; for he who hath opened up a path, and hath commanded us to advance in that
course in which he hath placed us, does not intend to assist us only for a single day, and to forsake us in
the middle of our course, (Phi_1:6,) but will conduct us to the goal.

(131) “ phrase translated ‘ shall gain new strength,’ properly means ‘ shall exchange strength;’ but the
usage of the verb determines its specific meaning to be that of changing for the better, or improving. The
sense is therefore correctly given in the English Version (‘ shall renew their strength’” —Alexander. 

(132) Les fideles.

8. GREAT TEXTS OF THE BIBLE, “God’s Waiting Ones 
 
They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they shall mount up with wings as eagles; they
shall run, and not be weary; they shall walk, and not faint.—Isa_40:31.
In speaking to the heart of Jerusalem the great prophet of the Exile spoke a word which will always be in
season to them that are weary, and to such as are engaged in great undertakings. An earlier prophet had
seen a vision of dry bones, the emblems of a dead people, to whom he was commissioned to promise a
renewal of national life. He had spoken to these dry bones; the Spirit of God had breathed upon them;
and as the heavenly wind swept through the stifling valley of death the scattered bones came together,

joint to joint, and flesh came upon them, and breath came into them, and they stood up a great army.
Now the new prophet has to speak to the awakening people in the early hours of their reviving national
life and aspirations, and he has to comfort them amongst the fears which imperil the great enterprise for
which they have been revived. And all through this chapter he deals with them. There is the profound
sense of guilt, and he deals with that, assuring them of forgiveness.

There is the dread of the great heathen empires which have broken and seem unbreakable, and he deals
with that, and shows how these great kings and judges and empires are but as dust in the balance and
their gods are silent. Yes, he has to speak to them in the beginnings of their rethinking out the situation.
They are alive many of them, but most of them are only just alive; and as the sensations experienced by
those who are coming out of a swoon are practically the same as the feelings of those who are sinking
into one, the prophet pictures some of these men as lying prone upon the ground, prostrate and
motionless, and the clammy dews of faintness upon their brows. They are unable to rise, and as they lie
there he bids them at least lift up their eyes and look up into the heavens and consider these things. Who
hath created all these things? Hast thou, Jacob, not known? Hast thou not heard? The Everlasting
Jehovah, the Creator of the ends of the earth, fainteth not, neither is weary.l He giveth power to the
faint, and to them that have no might He increaseth strength.

The prophet was not only consoling prostrate and decrepit souls; there were some among them who not
only had awakened, but had received a new?born strength, and were eager to attempt the heroic task of
national restoration. His one desire was to save them from the disastrous, but not uncommon, mistake of
supposing that this feeling of strength and power and fitness is a sufficient indication that they carry in
themselves an adequate and permanent reserved strength, without replenishment from outside. He
proclaims to them the universal law of creature life. Man at his best estate rapidly expends his energy of
body and mind and soul, and must utterly fail unless replenished; and so, he says, even the youths—
using a term which, to Hebrew ears, would designate the period, say, from about fourteen to twenty—
even the youths, still growing lads, the almost men, those who are in the freshest time of life, when the
step is full of spring and all activity is joy, even these, he says, will faint and grow weary before this great
enterprise has been accomplished. The chosen men, picked men, young men—because young men are
the picked men for such enterprises—the chosen, picked men of their generation, the elect of all those
who have reached that period when activity and staying power are best combined with acquired skill and
discipline, even these shall utterly fall. But are they, therefore, to sit down supinely? Having fallen shall
they lie still, and groan that all is over? No! cries the clarion voice of the prophet, for God is not weary,
God is not faint, and they that wait on Him, though not exempted from the law of decline, shall experience
the law of revival; “they that wait on Him shall renew their strength.” Let them lift up their voices to God, let
them make their prayer unto Him, and then wealth and want, strength and weakness, God and man, shall
meet together and find a common blessedness in giving and receiving might.

A ship is stuck on a mud?bank; and, the tide going out, it careens over, and there it lies, like many
discouraged Christians. They do not need to anchor. The anchor is out, though. By and by the tide begins
to come in, little by little. The captain calls up the crew, and orders them to hoist in the anchor. It is
hoisted in and stowed away. “Trim the sails,” is the next command; and that is obeyed. The tide is still
coming in, coming in, coming in; and by and by the vessel floats off, and the crew look up with admiration
and say, “What a captain we have! It was the hauling in of the anchor and the trimming of the sails that
saved us. The captain gave his orders, they were obeyed, and then she floated.” No, it was not the
captain’s doings. The Lord God who swings the stars through the heavens, and exerts His power upon
the ocean, did it. The captain merely foresaw the coming of the tide, and adapted the circumstances of
the vessel to influences which existed before.
1[Note: H. W. Beecher.]

 

 
They that wait upon the Lord

To wait for Jehovah, or to wait on Jehovah, has in the mouth of the pious Israelite a very definite, specific
meaning, very different from the general sense of our expressions “to have faith in God,” “to trust in the
Lord,” at least as generally used. The typical passage is Gen_49:18, “I have waited, or I wait for thy
salvation, O Jehovah.” On this the Jerusalem Targum says: “But not upon the salvation of Gideon, the
son of Joas, does my soul gaze, because that is temporal; not to the salvation wrought by Samson, the
son of Manoah, is my longing directed, because that is transitory; but upon the salvation which Thou in
Thy Word hast promised to bring to Thy people, the seed of Israel. Unto Thy salvation, Jehovah, unto the
salvation of Messiah, the son of David, who at some future time will deliver Israel, and restore them from
their exile, unto that salvation my looking and my longing are directed, because Thy salvation is an
eternal salvation.” In other words, the thought is connected with the promise of
redemption, that redemption, that salvation, which was to be brought about by the coming and presence
and manifestation of Jehovah as the Deliverer, the Redeemer, the Saviour of His people.
1 [Note: A. H.
Huizinga, in The Presbyterian and Reformed Review, v. p. 89.]

But waiting upon the Lord may now be taken in a more comprehensive way, and as covering three great
acts of life.

1. It means Prayer. It means much more than an occasional supplication, however real; it means
persistent, persevering, continual prayer; it means an abiding attitude of trustful dependence upon God; it
means all that is wrapped up in those beautiful words we love to hear sung, “O rest in the Lord, and wait
patiently for Him”; it means trust in the Lord and do good; it means trust in the Lord at all times, for with
Him is everlasting strength, and have no confidence in self. But the prophet has a deeper thought than
this. There are many things for which we can only ask and then wait in quiet stillness, things which we
cannot help God to give us, things which God Himself bestows without our aid, if we are ever to possess
them. There are times when the soul is so utterly spent that God bends over our voiceless misery as the
Good Samaritan bent over the speechless Jew, and not waiting for those trembling pallid lips to ask,
poured oil and wine into his wounds, and lifted up his almost passive frame, and set him on his own
beast.

The praying spirit can be granted to a man as his soul is in the attitude of prayer. Then we are like a bird
with outstretched pinions, poised betwixt earth and heaven, waiting in the atmosphere of God for the
knowledge of the work we have to do. And as the bird descends to the nest on the earth which it can see
from afar, so we should descend to our duties unperceived except we were on high with God. There, the
heart open to God, the soul responsive to His influences, lifted above the meanness of earth, we get a
true perspective of our duty; we have a high courage, we see what is required of us, and seeing, we
descend to do it. It is easy for us in our hours of silent communion with God to feel the meaning of
things—the meaning never put into words, for heaven comes near and illuminates earth. Nay, rather we
discover that earth and heaven are one.

And when in silent awe we wait

And word and sign forbear,

The hinges of the golden gate

Move soundless to our prayer.

During the great Welsh revival, it is said a minister was marvellously successful in his preaching. He had
but one sermon, but under it hundreds of men were saved. Far away from where he lived, in a lonely
valley, news of this wonderful success reached a brother preacher. Forthwith he became anxious to find
out the secret of this success. He started out, and walked the long and weary road, and, at length,
reaching the humble cottage where the good minister lived, he said, “Brother, where did you get that
sermon?” He was taken into a poorly furnished room, and pointed to a spot where the carpet was worn
shabby and bare, near a window that looked out towards the solemn mountains, and the minister said,
“Brother, that is where I got that sermon. My heart was heavy for men. One evening I knelt there, and

cried for power to preach as I had never preached before. The hours passed until midnight struck, and
the stars looked down on a sleeping valley and the silent hills; but the answer came not, so I prayed on
until at length I saw a faint grey shoot up in the east; presently it became silver, and I watched and prayed
until the silver became purple and gold, and on all the mountain crests blazed the altar fires of the new
day; and then the sermon came, and the power came, and I lay down and slept, and arose and preached,
and scores fell down before the fire of God; that is where I got that sermon.”
1 [Note: G. H. Morgan, Modern
Knights?Errant, p. 100.]

In the year 1861 the Southern States of America were filled with slaves and slaveholders. It was
proposed to make Abraham Lincoln president. But he had resolved that if he came to that position of
power he would do all he could to wipe away the awful scourge from the page of his nation’s history. A
rebellion soon became imminent, and it was expected that in his inaugural address much would be said
respecting it. The time came. The Senate House was packed with people; before him was gathered the
business skill and the intellectual power of the States. With one son lying dead in the White House, whom
he loved with a fond father’s affection; another little boy on the borders of eternity; with his nation’s eternal
disgrace or everlasting honour resting upon his speech, he speaks distinctly, forcefully, and without fear.
Friend and foe marvel at his collected movements. They know of the momentous issues which hang on
his address. They know the domestic trials that oppress his heart. But they do not know that, before
leaving home that morning, the President had taken down the family Bible and conducted their home
worship as usual, and then had asked to be left alone. The family withdrawing, they heard his tremulous
voice raised in pleadings with God, that He whose shoulder sustains the government of worlds would
guide him and overrule his speech for His own glory. Here was the secret of this man’s strength.
1 [Note: G.
H. Morgan, Modern Knights?Errant, p. 104.]

2. It means Faith. The original word means to “fully trust” or “strongly hope,” to believe that the thing
hoped for will be effected, and so to wait patiently and steadily till it is done. It has nothing to do,
therefore, with the off?putting of the impenitent; nor with the apathy, indolence, and indifference that too
often creep over believers themselves. To wait upon the Lord, instead of being a weak or languid form of
faith, is the form that shows most of its endurance and power. No doubt it is an expression which brings
out the quiet side of the spiritual life. But our text states this important and too much forgotten secret of
that life—that it is just such quiet confidence in God that maintains and revives grace in the soul.

“They that wait upon the Lord” is Old Testament dialect for what in New Testament phraseology is meant
by “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ.” For the notion expressed here by “waiting” is that of expectant
dependence, and the New Testament “faith” is the very same in its attitude of expectant dependence,
while the object of the Old Testament “waiting,” Jehovah, is identical with the object of the New
Testament “faith,” which fastens on God manifest in the flesh, the Man Jesus Christ. Therefore, I am not
diverting the language of my text from its true meaning, but simply opening its depth, when I say that the
condition of the inflow of this unwearied and immortal life into our poor, fainting, dying humanity is simply
the trust in Jesus Christ the Redeemer of our souls. True, the revelation has advanced, the contents of
that which we grasp are more developed and articulate, blessed be God! True, we know more about
Jehovah, when we see Him in Jesus Christ, than Isaiah did. True, we have to trust in Him as dying on the
Cross for our salvation and as the pattern and example in His humanity of all nobleness and beauty for
young or old, but the Christ is the “same yesterday, and to?day, and for ever.” And the faith that knit the
furthest back of the saints of old to the Jehovah whom they dimly knew, is in essence identical with the
faith that binds my poor, sinful heart to the Christ that died and that lives for my redemption and
salvation.
1 [Note: A. Maclaren. The Unchanging Christ, p. 17.]

Waiting upon the Lord is not merely a passing call, but an abiding in Him. Waiting is not so much a
transient action as a permanent attitude. It is not the restless vagrant calling at the door for relief, it is
rather the intimacy of the babe at the breast.
2 [Note: J. H. Jowett, The Silver Lining, p. 131.]

3. It means Service. Waiting upon the Lord means not only praying and trusting, it means doing His
commandments, like the angels, who because they do them excel in strength, hearkening to the voice of

His Word. These winged messengers of His are waiting upon God as truly when they fly to the uttermost
parts of His dominions as when they veil their faces with their wings before the central throne; and so the
man who is filled with the Lord, and relies upon Divine help, is as truly waiting on the Lord when he goes
out from his chamber strengthened in purpose to do the right and to obey the golden rule to keep God’s
name hallowed in business, and wherever he may be to do nothing which shall add to the burdens of his
neighbours, nothing to make faith harder for the unbeliever, nothing to make life harder for the saint. The
man who goes out to do the common work of the world, trusting in God to help him to endure the
hardness and the temptation, and to come off more than conqueror, is waiting on the Lord when he
engages with all his heart and mind and strength, in the discharge of these common duties, as when in a
locked chamber he kneels with clasped hands before the unseen Throne of Grace.

Waiting is not an idle and impassive thing. When the Bible speaks of waiting upon God, it means
something different from doing nothing. We commonly contrast waiting with working, and there is a sense
in which the contrast is a just one; but if it leads us to think that waiting is not working, it has done wrong
to a great Bible word. Think, for example, of the Cabinet minister whose duty it is to wait upon the king. Is
that an idle or a sauntering business? Can it be entered on without a thought? Will it not rather claim the
whole attention, and make the statesman eager and alert? For him, at any rate, waiting is not idleness;
rather it is the crown of all his toil. I have heard soldiers say that in a battle the hardest thing is not the
final rush. In that wild moment a man forgets himself and is caught into a mad tumult of enthusiasm. The
hardest thing is to stand quiet and wait, while the hail of the enemy’s fire is whistling round—to wait in the
darkness and in the face of death, and be forbidden to return the fire. It is that which tries the nerves and
tests the heart. It is that which shows the stuff that men are made of. In such an hour a man is not
asleep—he is intensely and tremendously alive.

Sometimes we do not know what to do—it is not clear; you possibly have come to a cross, to a division in
the road, and you are at a loss clearly to see the way and to decide upon what you ought to do; it wants
strength of mind to be content to wait, to be content to be still.

There is a great deal in that expression of St. Paul’s, “Study to be quiet.” Why, one might think, we may
certainly be quiet without any very great study. It is a great thing to learn to be quiet: “He that believeth
shall not make haste.” Do not take God’s work into your own hands; when a thing is not clear, and you
are really in doubt, and when you do not know what it is right to do, do not be in a hurry, do not make
things worse by precipitancy; “it is good for a man patiently to wait.” You may like to be at work, you feel
as if you had gifts that should not be idle; it may be necessary, you know, that you should just be quiet for
a time, and God will show you by and by what you ought to do.

God doth not need

Either man’s work, or his own gifts. Who best

Bear his mild yoke, they serve him best. His state

Is kingly; thousands at his bidding speed,

And post o’er land and ocean without rest;

They also serve who only stand and wait.

You get up in the morning, and before you do anything else, you go and place yourself on your knees,
and you “wait” a few minutes for the Father’s blessing. You seek an audience of the King of kings. You
pay duty to God. You recognise your relationship to God—your dependence upon God—your trust in
God. That is “waiting upon the Lord.” Then, all the day, feeling your weakness, and ignorance, and
danger, you are constantly in little secret acts of communion—by silent prayer and silent praise. That is
carrying on the “waiting upon the Lord.” Then, you carry about with you—whatever you are doing—
whomever else you are serving—the thought, “I am doing this for Christ, I am serving the Lord Christ. I
am waiting upon my own dear Master.” And you like always to have some special work in hand which is

immediately done for Christ. It is your privilege, your joy, to do something for anybody’s comfort—
something for anybody’s soul—all for Jesus. That is “waiting upon the Lord.” You come up to this place
not only and not so much for anything you are to get here; but to do homage; to attend court; to show
your affectionate reverence; to unite with all God’s hosts in every world in an act of solemn worship. That
is “waiting upon the Lord.” Or, you draw nearer still, into the sanctuary of the Holy Communion. You wait
on Christ for some brighter manifestations of His presence. You take, at His hands, the soul’s bread and
the soul’s wine; and you unite yourself to Him in His own appointed way. That is service—free, holy,
happy service. As true service, as acceptable to God, as the service of an angel—as the service of that
blessed company in heaven, where His servants are serving Him indeed.

 
II 
 
Shall renew their Strength
The word “renew” means here to put a new thing in place of an old thing. So in Isa_9:10 : “Sycomores
have been cut down, but cedars will we put in their place.” Hence it is, literally, to put a new fresh strength
in place of the old. But how is this to be brought about? In what way are those that wait for Jehovah to
renew their strength? To my mind there is only one possible answer to this question. Do we not read in
the words almost immediately preceding: “He (Jehovah) giveth to the weary force, and unto the
powerless maketh strength to abound” (Cheyne)? In themselves those that wait for Jehovah are not any
better or stronger, they have no greater power of exertion or of endurance, than the youths who faint and
are weary, and the young men who stumble. But this is the supreme advantage which they have. They
renounce, abandon, their own strength, or rather their supposed strength, that strength which has been
used up, that strength which has been found utterly inadequate, that strength they renounce and
abandon, and they take in its place the strength of Jehovah Himself. What they cannot do for themselves,
Jehovah does for them. The strength of Jehovah, fresh, inexhaustible, almighty, Divine, takes the place
of, is the substitute for, their own strength, so weak, so limited, so utterly inadequate. In other words, we
have here one phase of the Christian doctrine of substitution, not substitution as applied to the matter of
atonement, the sacrifice offered for sin, but as applied to the spiritual experience of the believer in
meeting the various temptations, sorrows, losses, afflictions, trials, and adversities of life, in performing
the various duties of life and in accomplishing its work for the glory of his Lord, and the advancement of
His Kingdom.

The Word of God is filled with promises, which glitter and shine on every page of this sacred Book—and
yet, as every effect has a cause, so every promise has its condition; and as in Nature the effect cannot be
disjoined from the cause, no more can the blessing be disjoined from the condition. They are inseparably
united. “And the word of the Lord came to Joshua, saying, Go over Jordan and take the land. There shall
no man be able to stand against thee all the days of thy life, for as I was with Moses, so will I be with
thee. I will never fail thee nor forsake thee. Only be thou very courageous.” This law comes into our text—
“They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength.” The condition of waiting upon the Lord must be
fulfilled before we can expect the renewal of our strength. And be it remembered that here, as in all other
cases, material and spiritual, the condition is not some arbitrary demand on the part of God. It is not His
exorbitant price for the blessing in question. The condition is the means whereby the blessing is to be
obtained. Thus the essential condition for getting a strong, muscular arm is that it shall be used to do hard
and constant service. But if this condition be fulfilled, it will also prove to be the means whereby the
strength is produced.

1. The man who waits upon the Lord gets an ever wider experience of God’s grace and faithfulness as life
advances. All experienced Christians grow brighter, stronger, and calmer in their assurance of God’s
love. Every one who has known anything of grace in himself can confirm this.

Let me call one witness—a ripe Bible scholar—but one who began life as a poor boy in a workhouse. He
had lost his hearing absolutely, by an accident, while little more than a child. By well?meaning friends he

was consigned to a poorhouse. But he ended, after many labours, a loved and honoured interpreter of
Holy Scripture. This is what Dr. John Kitto writes on a like text in this same prophet Isaiah: “Thirty years
ago, before the Lord caused me to wander from my father’s house and from my native place, I put my
mark upon this text: ‘I am the Lord; they shall not be ashamed that wait for Me.’ Of the many books I now
possess,” he goes on, “the Bible that bears this mark was the only one that belonged to me at that time.
It now lies before me, and I find that although the hair which was then as dark as night has meanwhile
become ‘a sable silvered,’ the ink which marked this text has grown into intensity of blackness,
corresponding with the growing intensity of conviction. ‘They shall not be ashamed that wait for Him.’ I
believed it then, I know it now; and I can write with all my heart over against that symbol, Probatum est—
‘It is proved.’ Looking back through the long period which has passed since I set my mark to these
words—a portion of human life which forms the best and brightest, as well as the most trying and
conflicting, in all man’s experience—it is a joy to be able to say it. Under many perilous circumstances, in
many trying scenes, amid faintings within and fears without, under sorrows that rend the heart and
troubles that crush it down, ‘I have waited for Thee, O Lord, and I stand this day as one not
ashamed.’ ”
1 [Note: J. Laidlaw, Studies in the Parables, p. 262.]

2. It is only by waiting on the Lord that His ways can be discovered and understood. Our hasty glances
and hurried inferences are sure to err. You notice Israel in this chapter—captive, broken?hearted, and
complaining—says, “My way is hid from the Lord, and my judgment is passed over from my God.” How
often have we fallen into such pettish and childish thoughts of our heavenly Father! We forget how great,
how calm, how unwearied and unwearying, He is! “The everlasting God, the Lord, the Creator of the ends
of the earth, fainteth not. There is no searching of his understanding”; but waiting upon Him brings us to
know Him, and so renews our strength.

Several years ago a connection was discovered by a man of science between two sets of natural facts
which seem far enough apart, viz. the magnetic currents of the earth and the spots on the sun. It was
made in this way: A German astronomer, Schwabe, of Dessau, capital of the Duchy of Anhalt, for a very
long succession of years observed and kept account of the number of sun?spots seen every day, so that
a periodic rise and fall in the numbers was made out, during regular cycles of eleven years,
corresponding with a like cycle of magnetic storms on the earth. Now this law or fact was learned by
waiting for it. So many years the observer spent to satisfy himself, and so many more years to convince
the world. For forty?two years the sun never rose a single morning, clear of clouds, above the flat horizon
of that German plain at Dessau, but the patient telescope of Schwabe confronted him. On an average,
about 300 days out of every year the observations were taken, so that over 12,000 times was the sun
seen, and above 5000 groups of sun?spots were discovered. “An instance,” were the words used in
awarding a prize to Schwabe, “of devoted persistence unsurpassed in the annals of astronomy.” The
energy of one man has discovered what had eluded even the suspicion of astronomers for two hundred
years. The scientific observer has faith in the uniformity and consistency of nature. He waits for it. He
“believes” that it is, and that it becomes a rewarder of those who diligently seek it.
1 [Note: G. H. Morgan.]

3. There is even a simpler and more direct explanation of the fact that “waiting upon the Lord renews our 
strength.” The ancient Greeks had a fable of an earth?born giant who could not be overcome by the
ordinary process of knocking him down, for the reason that every time he touched his mother?earth he
revived. Now invert that process. It describes the secret of the strength of faith. It is heaven?born. All
grace is of the Lord. Each act of fresh dependence upon God “renews its strength.” Everything that
breaks us off from self and means, and drives us up in our helplessness to the Lord, is our gain. For “He
giveth power to the faint, and to them that have no might he increaseth strength” (v. 29). “Most gladly
therefore,” as St. Paul says, “will I rather glory in my infirmities, that the power of Christ may rest upon
me; for when I am weak, then am I strong” (2Co_12:9?10).

You touch your electric button, and immediately the bell in your kitchen rings. You know that an influence
of some kind, which is generated in the cells lying down in your cellar, is carried in a trice round the wires
and makes that bell ring; but what that influence is, or how it passes along the wires, neither you nor the
wisest electrician in the world can tell. Yet you believe that such influence or power exists, and you act
upon your belief. So I am told that waiting upon God produces renewed strength. Although I do not know

how that strength travels from God to me, though I am unable to define that strength, yet when, after
testing the statement, I find it to be correct in practice, I will believe it, and act upon that belief.
1 [Note: G. H.
Morgan.]

“With five shillings,” said Teresa the mystic, when her friends laughed at her proposal to build an
orphanage—“with five shillings Teresa can do nothing; but with five shillings and God there is nothing
Teresa cannot do.”
2 [Note: J. D. Jones, Elims of Life, p. 140.]

Lord, at Thy feet my prostrate heart is lying,

Worn with the burden, weary of the way;

The world’s proud sunshine on the hills is dying,

And morning’s promise fades with parting day;

Yet in Thy light another morn is breaking,

Of fairer promise, and with pledge more true,

And in Thy life a dawn of youth is waking

Whose bounding pulses shall this heart renew.



Oh, to go back across the years long vanished,

To have the words unsaid, the deeds undone,

The errors cancelled, the deep shadows banished,

In the glad sense of a new world begun;

To be a little child, whose page of story

Is yet undimmed, unblotted by a stain,

And in the sunrise of primeval glory

To know that life has had its start again!



I may go back across the years long vanished,

I may resume my childhood, Lord, in Thee,

When in the shadow of Thy cross are banished

All other shadows that encompass me:

And o’er the road that now is dark and dreary,

This soul, made buoyant by the strength of rest,

Shall walk untired, shall run and not be weary,

To bear the blessing that has made it blest.
3 [Note: George Matheson.]

 
III 
 
They shall mount … they shall run … they shall walk
1. That is a most noticeable sequence. Look at it. “They shall mount up with wings l; they shall run l;
they shall walk.” Flying, running, walking. At first sight this looks like an anticlimax, and the promise reads
like a descending promise. If we had wished to use these phrases to illustrate the effects of the strength
which God supplies, and if we had wished to use them in an ascending scale, so that each should
intensify and carry to a higher point the assertion made in the other, we should have inverted the order,
and should have read the clauses thus: “They that wait upon the Lord shall renew their strength; they
shall walk, and not faint; they shall run, and not be weary: they shall mount up with wings as eagles.” But
the prophet begins with the flying and ends with the walking. It looks at first sight, I repeat, as if it were a
descending and diminishing promise; as if the progress were from greater to less, and from less to least.
As Dr. George Adam Smith puts it, “Soaring, running, walking; and is not the next stage, a cynic might
ask, standing still?”
1 [Note: J. D. Jones, Elims of Life, p. 141.]

Those who turned the passage into metre for our use in praise in the Paraphrases, have changed the
order into what might be supposed more natural; walking first, then running, and last the eagle’s flight. Yet
no doubt the order as it stands has its reason and its force. It may be simply this, that the eagle?flight is
the Christian’s burst of early joy and praise; the unwearied running the main onward ardour of an active
Christian course; the walk without fainting, the last calm steps and firm, that land the saint in glory. But I
prefer to find a principle in it, viz., that in accordance with the whole strain of reflection to which the text
has led us, the perseverance of grace is more remarkable than even its occasional triumphs; that the
daily course it runs, and the persistence with which it goes further and further, the more the Lord has for it
to do, is that which most effectually proves its Divine origin and character. Let us only wait upon the Lord,
be wholly, constantly, and vitally dependent upon Him, then we shall renew our strength, change and
interchange it too. When soaring is needful “we shall mount up on wings as eagles”; when rapid, steady,
onward progress is to be made, “we shall run and not be weary”; but always and all through we shall
persevere, “we shall walk and not faint.”
2[Note: J. Laidlaw.]

Strength will come for every day’s endurance,

Grace all the way, and glory at the end.

Many cyclists find the three?speed interchangeable gear of great service in varieties of road and weather.
Along a good surface, and with a favourable wind, by using the high gear one can easily have a short
burst at the rate of from fifteen to twenty miles an hour. When things are not so favourable it is easy to
change to the middle gear. With the low gear it is possible to climb stiff hills or continue to ride in the teeth
of a gale. May we not see in this an illustration of the true Christian who by waiting on the Lord renews or
changes his strength?

A sudden emergency arises and with Christian audacity he courageously attempts the task, he mounts up
and is victorious. The demand calls for strenuous effort possibly somewhat prolonged; again, through
waiting, his strength is changed, and once more he is victorious. Or, greatest triumph of all, his task is the
monotonous plodding of daily duty in the face of adverse influence, and with nothing apparently heroic in
the work; but he waits on the Lord, his strength is changed, and he walks without fainting.

2. There is no doubt that we have here a kind of historic treatment of the condition of Israel, of the way in
which God’s people rise triumphantly above their difficulties, and then march onward in the greatness of
their strength. What was the first thing they needed? They were in the grasp of the heathen, surrounded
by a great wall of captivity. The iron bonds of the strong were around them, the high walls of
imprisonment were there. They were like birds in a cage. What do they require first? Why, eagles’ wings,
of course, to escape from their prison. They must get up out of this imprisoning barrier some way or other,
and God must lend them the strong wings of the eagle that they may soar until they surmount the
barriers, and find themselves in the free heaven of liberty again. What do they need next? They must
begin their national life anew with enthusiasm. They must haste to build up Zion again. Their hands must
not tire by night or day until they have completed the building of the temple of the Lord. Every nerve that
belongs to them, every muscle, every power must be devoted to the task! They must run for a time, for
there is haste and urgency, and much to be done in a short time. Ah, but what then when all this
enthusiasm, this first novelty, has passed away, what must they do then? Then they must begin the
march of a long history, on, on, on, as the days go by, with each rising sun setting forward on the great
national march again, bearing the heat and the burden of the day without fainting, from year to year,
generation to generation, age to age, on and on they must walk in the power of the Lord.

’Twas August, and the fierce sun overhead

Smote on the squalid streets of Bethnal Green,

And the pale weaver, through his windows seen

In Spitalfields, look’d thrice dispirited.



I met a preacher there I knew, and said:

“Ill and o’erwork’d, how fare you in this scene?”—

“Bravely!” said he; “for I of late have been

Much cheer’d with thoughts of Christ, the living bread.”



O human soul! as long as thou canst so

Set up a mark of everlasting light,

Above the howling senses’ ebb and flow,



To cheer thee, and to right thee if thou roam—

Not with lost toil thou labourest through the night!

Thou mak’st the heaven thou hop’st indeed thy home.
1 [Note: Matthew Arnold.]

3. This might be illustrated, if one had imagination, by taking the three forms of genius, temperament,
and character. There are some men who naturally have, as it were, the imaginative faculty, the poetic
faculty, and their tendency is to soar; they cannot help it, it is the impulse of the genius within them—that
is the particular form that the gift of God in them takes—aspiration, a rising and soaring. Well, if that man

with his genius waits upon God, and that genius becomes sanctified, he will mount up on wings as eagles
towards heaven; there will be sanctified genius, imaginative, embodying itself in sacred song; that which
will lift other souls to heaven and give them wings. Then there are other people that are distinguished by
perpetual activity; they must be doing something, warring, running, fighting, taking hold of something by
perpetual activity; and if sanctified, they will run in the way of God’s commandments; if God energises
their heart with Divine strength they will be able to achieve anything. And there are others of a soberer
sort who can neither run nor fly, but they can walk; and, like Enoch, they can walk with God. They quietly
walk, drawing no observation to themselves; without great genius, and without the faculty for great
achievement, but just walking humbly in that quiet vale of life, they walk, and while the man of the wing
does not weary, and the man running does not faint, neither do they—they keep on and on in the way of
God and in the way everlasting.

Amiel was a professor in a Swiss university. In his younger dayshis friends prophesied great things
concerning him; he was a brilliant and talented youth, and naturally looked forward himself to a life of
large activity and great usefulness. In the end he proved what the world calls a failure. It was not only his
friends who thought so, for he thought so too. He falsified all the predictions of those who loved him. In
life he never did anything very bad, and he never seemed to do anything very good. Few students
attended his lectures in the Swiss university where he did his life’s work, and Amiel could not help feeling
that he was indeed a failure, and he was in great bitterness of spirit many a time. He wrote down his
thoughts about himself and the experiences of his everyday life—the humdrum, the drudgery, the
untoward, and the unwelcome. He kept his journal for his own eye alone, and every night he entered
therein his thoughts and feelings, and the totality of the experiences he had gained during the day. It is
sad reading; we have it now Amiel is gone. He had not discovered what the whole world has now
discovered—that he was really doing his life’s work in the very midst and by means of that which seemed
to be a sorry failure. By his experience, gained in mediocre service, gained even through his
disappointment, gained by the labours of the every day, in the midst of the comments of those who were
sorry that he had not developed something better, he was learning, and for generations to come
everybody will see that his life?work was done by means of that which he would have regarded as a
failure of that life?work.
1 [Note: R. J. Campbell.]

4. The marginal reading of the text throws yet another light on its meaning. “They that wait upon the Lord
shall change their strength.” The truth suggested is the important one that they who are calmly and
constantly depending upon God will get renewal of strength according to their time and their need. They
may seem even to exchange one form of strength for another. The strength of a young tree is of one
kind—in putting forth shoots, leaves, and blossoms. The strength of the same tree, mature, is of another
kind in firmness and fruitfulness. The graces which were active and vigorous in a believer at his first
conversion to God, such as were carried upon a stream of warm, natural affections, ought to be renewed
or exchanged for more wise, practical, patient fruit?bearing in riper years; and may be exchanged again
for deeper spirituality, heavenliness of mind, readiness for the cross, and death as life advances. Now, in
these renewals or exchanges of strength he shall be not less useful or pleasing to his Lord. Christ foretold
to His Apostle Peter that in his last days he would serve his Master in a very different fashion from that of
his youth. “When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedest whither thou wouldest: but when
thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee and carry thee whither
thou wouldest not.” When Peter fell at last a martyr, was bound by his foes, and borne away to be
crucified—they say with his head downwards, at his own request, that in one thing at least he might be
lower than his Lord—was Peter less strong in faith, was he less loving, than when he girded his fisher’s
coat about him to swim; or flashed out his sword in the garden, or preached the word of his risen Lord
amid howling mobs in the streets of Jerusalem? No! He was stronger, more loving, more lovable, for all
those years of waiting had “renewed his strength.” And so perhaps we have a key to the anticlimax which
closes this verse. “They shall mount up with wings as eagles; they shall run and not be weary, and they
shall walk and not faint.”

The heart which boldly faces death

Upon the battlefield, and dares

Cannon and bayonet, faints beneath

The needle?point of frets and cares.

The stoutest hearts they do dismay—

The tiny stings of every day.



And even saints of holy fame,

Whose souls by faith have overcome.

Who wore amid the cruel flame

The molten crown of martyrdom,

Bore not without complaint alway

The petty pains of every day.



Ah! more than martyr’s aureole,

And more than hero’s heart of fire,

We need the humble strength of soul

Which daily toils and ills require.

Sweet Patience, grant us, if you may,

An added grace for every day.

 
IV 
 
They shall mount up with wings as eagles
They who wait upon the Lord shall obtain a marvellous addition to their resources. Their life shall be
endowed with mysterious but most real equipment. They shall obtain wings. We do well when picturing
the angel presences to endow them with wings. At the best it is a clumsy symbolism, but all symbolisms
of eternal things are clumsy and ineffective. And what do we mean by wings? We mean that life has
gained new powers, extraordinary capacity; the old self has received heavenly addition, endowing it with
nimbleness, buoyancy, strength. We used to sing in our childhood, “I want to be an angel.” I am afraid the
sentiment was often poor and unworthy, and removed our thoughts rather to a world that is to be than to
the reality by which we are surrounded to?day. But it is right to wish to be an angel if by that wish we
aspire after angelic powers and seek for angels’ wings. It is right to long for their powers of flight, their
capacity to soar to the heights. We may have the angels’ wings. Wing?power is not only the reward of
those who are redeemed out of time and emancipated from death, and who have entered into the larger
life of the unseen glory, but it is the prerogative of you and me. “They that wait upon the Lord l shall

mount up with wings.” Waiting upon the Lord will enable us to share the angels’ fellowship, to feed on
angels’ food, and to acquire the angels’ power of wing. “They shall mount up with wings as eagles.”

The saints of God are mountaineers, mounting up to higher and purer air than can be found on earth.
Their “citizenship is in heaven.” Their great delight is to be with the Lord on the mount; they are glad to be
able in heart and mind to sit with Jesus Christ in the heavenlies, holding communion with their Father and
His Son Jesus Christ, through the ever?present and powerful influence of the Holy Spirit. The eagle
mounts up with remarkable rapidity, and is noted for its swiftness of flight. God asks Job, “Doth the eagle
mount up at thy command, and make her nest on high?” (Job_39:27). Solomon speaks, too, of this
swiftness of flight. “Wilt thou set thine eyes upon that which is not? For riches certainly make themselves
wings, like an eagle that flieth toward heaven” (Pro_23:5). Saul and Jonathan were “swifter than eagles”
(2Sa_1:23). So when we have the Spirit of God with us, we are able in an instant to wing our flight away
from things of time and sense, and enter through the veil into the very presence of the Most High. We
must take no credit or glory to ourselves for this, for as of old with His literal Israel, so now with His
spiritual Israel, the Lord “bears us on eagles’ wings, and brings us unto Himself” (Exo_19:4).

I will tell you about the eagle’s nest. The eagle makes a nest of thorns, and over the thorns the eagle puts
some very soft things—some wool or some down over the thorns. And there the eagle lays its eggs, and
when the eggs are hatched, the little eagles come out into the nest, and there they stay. And when it is
time for the little eagles to fly, what do you think the old eagle does? With his great talons he scratches off
the soft wool and the down, and then the thorns prick the little birds, and they must fly because the thorns
prick them. And so they fly away, and fly away because the thorns prick them. And what do you think the
old eagle does then? He is such a kind old bird. He comes and puts his great wings under the wings of
the little birds, and helps them to fly; and so the young eaglets can fly very high, because their father, the
old eagle, helps them with his great wings to fly away. And then they go up, and up very high; and if you
have ever seen a great bird—a great hawk, or a kite, or an eagle, as I have seen an eagle, it is very
beautiful to see how it flies. It goes up very high, and it makes great circles round and round, and goes
very fast, and yet you hardly see it move its wings. It seems almost to go without flapping its wings. It is
so grand, so large a circle, and it does it so quietly, so quietly, up very high and round and round.
1 [Note: J.
Vaughan, in Contemporary Pulpit, 2 Ser., iii. p. 166.]

What are the characteristics of life with wings?

1. Buoyancy.—We become endowed with power to rise above things! How often we give the counsel one
to another, “You should rise above it!” But too often it is idle counsel, because it implies that the friend to
whom we give it has the gift of wings; too frequently he is only endowed with feet. If, when we give the
counsel, we could give the wings, the things that bind him to the low plains of life might be left behind.

2. Loftiness.—We speak of a “lofty character” as opposed to one who is low or mean. There are men with
low motives, and they move along the low way. There are men with mean affections which do not
comprehend a brother. Now, it is the glorious characteristic of the Christian religion that it claims to give
loftiness to the life. There is no feature that the Bible loves more to proclaim than just this feature of
“aboveness.” It distinguishes the disciples of Christ. See how the ambitions of the Book run: “Seek the
things that are above”; “Set your mind on things above.” It speaks also of dwelling “with Christ in the
heavenly places.”

We cry, O for the wings of a dove! God says, “You have the wings, use them; but do not seek to fly away;
fly up, and though ye have lain among the pots, yet shall ye be as the wings of a dove covered with silver
and her feathers with yellow gold.” There is a sense in which we ought to have the wings of a dove; and
there is a sense in which we may be said actually to have them, only we do not use them enough. God’s
message to us is not merely that we may soar, but that we ought to soar easily above the things that
depress us and keep us down; and if we are in fellowship with Christ, and in the fellowship of the Holy
Ghost we will.
2 [Note: G. H. Knight.]

3. Comprehensiveness.—High soaring gives wide seeing. Loftiness gives comprehension. When we live

on the low grounds we possess only a narrow outlook. One man offers his opinion on some weighty
matter, and he is answered by the charge, “That is a very low ground to take.” The low ground always
means petty vision. Men who do not soar always have small views of things. We require wings for breadth
of view. Now see! The higher you get the greater will be the area that comes within your view. We may
judge our height by the measure of our outlook. How much do we see? We have not got very high if we
only see ourselves; nay, we are in the mire! “Look not every man on his own things, but every man also
on the things of others.” It is well when we get so high that our vision comprehends our town, better still
when it includes the country, better still when it encircles other countries, best of all when it engirdles the
world. It is well when we are interested in home missions; better still when home and foreign work are
comprehended in our view.

If we only lived more habitually above the world, we would have larger freedom, larger joy, and larger
safety. Have we not noticed how very helpless any bird is on the ground, though on the wing it is both
strong and safe? To fight temptations on their own level is not always the most successful way. It is better
to rise so far above, them that we shall feel as little enticed by them as God’s pure angels were enticed by
the iniquities of Sodom.
1 [Note: G. H. Knight.]

4. Proportion.—To see things aright we must get away from them. We never see a thing truly until we see
it in its relationships. We must see a moment in relation to a week, a week in relation to a year, a year in
relation to eternity. Wing?power gives us the gift of soaring, and we see how things are related one to
another. An affliction looked at from the lowlands may be stupendous; looked at from the heights it may
appear little or nothing. “Our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more
exceeding and eternal weight of glory.” What a breadth of view! And here is another. “The sufferings of
this present time are not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed to usward.” This is
a bird’s?eye view. It sees life “whole.”
2 [Note: J. H. Jowett.]

 

 
They shall run and not be weary
There are many meanings which this may bear. But the pith of them all seems to be Capacity for the most 
strenuous exertion. They shall run. Wherefore? Because the King’s business requireth haste. Would that
the King’s servants always felt this. We are too ready to imagine that our work is to be literally easy, and
our Christian witness?bearing literally light. But if ever the world is to be won to Christ, we shall have to
endure hardness for Him. We shall have to ponder deeply the great questions of the social and moral
well?being of what are called “the masses,” the ignorance and depravity of our large towns, the semi?
serfdom of the agricultural population, the great problem of the drunkenness that disgraces our national
life and what can be done to remove it, and many kindred subjects that, as yet, we have hardly looked at.

There is power waiting for you for all the great crises of your lives which call for special, though it may be
brief, exertion. Such crises will come to each of you, in sorrow, work, difficulty, hard conflicts. Moments
will be sprung upon you without warning, in which you will feel that years hang on the issue of an instant.
Great tasks will be clashed down before you unexpectedly which will demand the gathering together of all
your power. And there is only one way to be ready for such times as these, and that is to live waiting on
the Lord, near Christ, with Him in your hearts, and then nothing will come that will be too big for you.
However rough the road, and however severe the struggle, and however swift the pace, you will be able
to keep it up. Though it may be with panting lungs and a throbbing heart, and dim eyes and quivering
muscles, yet if you wait on the Lord you will run and not be weary. You will be masters of the crises.

Holiness does not consist exclusively in heavenly contemplation and prayer. The breathing of the pure air
of heaven is essential for the saints, that they may be able to “run” in the way of God’s commandments, 
and not grow weary in the race. There must be something very deficient in that holiness which is

characterised by slothfulness and lack of effort. We are told to “follow holiness” (Heb_12:14). The word
“to follow” signifies pursuing an enemy, or pursuing in the chase. Let us learn to be as intent upon
holiness as the soldier is intent upon pursuing the enemy. Let us be as eager to pursue holiness as the
hound is to follow the fox, or the hare, or the stag.

Have you ever noticed how the servants of God in the Bible—from Abraham and David to Philip in the
Acts—whenever they were told to do anything, always ran. It is the only way to do anything well. Run. A
thousand irksome duties become easy and pleasant if we do them runningly—that is, with a ready mind,
an affectionate zeal, and a happy alacrity.

In Indian Wigwams and Northern Camp-fires, by the Rev. E. R. Young, we are told that amongst the
brigades of Indians who annually left Norway House for the Mackenzie River and Athabasca districts with
supplies, and to bring back furs, the Christian brigade was always the first to return. The men themselves
attributed it to their observance of the Sabbath as a day of waiting upon God. According to their account
of one trip the brigades kept together until the first Saturday. Then those from the Christian mission chose
a place for their Sunday camp, and spent that day in rest and worship. Next day they started early,
refreshed by their rest, and on Thursday had passed the others and camped as the head brigade. Next
Sunday they rested again, and the others passed them and camped a few miles farther on. “We were up
very early on Monday morning, and came up to the others while they were at breakfast. With a cheer we
rowed by, and they did not catch up to us again.l We were three days down on our way home when we
met the other brigades going up.” They rested every Sunday during the trip of two months, yet were home
a week before those who pushed on every day. These Indians were no larger or stronger than others, but
in waiting upon God they renewed their physical as well as their spiritual strength.

 
VI 
 
They shall walk and not faint
Is this the same as saying that we shall have the power of steady perseverance, of patient endurance 
under protracted trial? Did the prophet put this last in his brief summary because patience is one of those
Christian graces that has its perfect work the latest—because the bearing of the Lord’s burden is often a
much more difficult thing than the doing of the Lord’s work? And was it because He would encourage us
by the assurance that even that power, difficult of attainment as it is, shall yet be ours through prayer?
Thank God for the assurance, for we greatly need it! “They shall break down under the trial,” suggests the
devil. “No,” says the prophet, “they shall bear up bravely.” That is, if in the great warfare it is not theirs to
be conspicuous in the battlefield, they shall receive power to be loyal in the barracks. If on the seas of
Christly inactivity it is not theirs to lead the squadrons of exploration, they shall at least be vigilant in the
roadstead, and alert about the shore.

The flight into the heavenlies, and the vigorous putting forth of effort, will fit us for the ordinary walks of
life. If all our religious exercises do not make us better husbands to our wives, better wives to our
husbands, better parents to our children, better children to our parents, better masters and mistresses to
our servants, and better servants to our masters, what are they all worth? We are then but “clouds without
water,” and trees “whose fruit withereth.”. Without doubt the highest attainment is put last—it is the climax
of holiness: “They shall walk, and not faint.” If there is not holiness in little things, what can we expect in
great things but mere paint and veneer, and what is artificial? But there is nothing so likely to produce true
saintship in the home and the quiet walks of daily life as prayer and much waiting on God, as well as
much valiant fighting and vigorous running, and deliberate setting aside every weight.

Let me give you four rules for this “walk.” (1) Start from Christ. Believe, and do not doubt your

forgiveness,—that you have an interest in Christ. The only setting?out point must be the foot of the cross.
(2) Walk with Christ. Feel Him at your side. Realise your union then. “How can two walk together except
they be agreed?” (3)Walk leaning on Christ. That is the most true and beautiful picture of the Christian in
the whole Bible,—“Who is this that cometh up from the wilderness, leaning upon her Beloved?” Up, up,
out of a world which has become a barren wilderness,—for the superior joys you now taste; “leaning,”
leaning on one she dearly loves. And then (4) walk to Christ. I know it is a long, rugged, steep road to go;
but you are going home; and you are going to Jesus! Therefore go; “looking unto Jesus, the Author and
Finisher of our Faith; who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame;
and is now set down” at the very place where you are going.
1 [Note: J. Vaughan.]

The United States in 1861 took up the sword in the cause of the negro. A wave of passionate enthusiasm
for the cause of the downtrodden and the oppressed swept over the land, and from every town and
village in the Northern States there went young men to fight the negro’s battle, singing as they went—

“John Brown’s body lies a?mouldering in the grave,

But his soul goes marching on.”

I admire the United States in those days of splendid enthusiasm and hope at the beginning of the war,
when she mounted up with wings as eagles, and ran, and was not weary. But I frankly confess I admire
that great nation still more in the later stages of the conflict; when the terrible realities of war came home
to her; when it became apparent that the deliverance of the negro was likely to be a long, costly, and
bloody business; when, in spite of defeat after defeat, she stuck doggedly to her task, sending regiment
after regiment and army after army into the field, bating not a jot or tittle of her resolve; not soaring or
running now, perhaps, but still “walking, and not faint.”
2 [Note: J. D. Jones.]

Did you ever hear of a great mathematician who lived a long while ago? He was one of the greatest
mathematicians, and knew about the stars. He was an astronomer, and was a very learned man. And he
has written his life, and he tells what happened to him when he was a boy. He says when a boy he got
tired of mathematics, and was going to give it all up. He said, “I shall give it up, I shall never be a clever
man.” Well, very strangely, as he was thinking that, he saw a piece of paper on the cover of his book, and
somehow or other, he could never tell why, he thought he should like to have it, and he got some water
and damped it, and then got this piece of paper off, and on it was written, “Go on, sir; go on, sir.” And he
said afterwards, “That was my master; I had no other master; that bit of paper was my master. I went
on—I went on; I would not give it up, and all through my life that has been my master, and to it I owe
everything.”
3 [Note: J. Vaughan.]

 
 
 
 

Footnotes:

Isaiah 40:3 Or A voice of one calling in the wilderness: / “Prepare the

way for the Lord
Isaiah 40:3 Hebrew; Septuagint make straight the paths of our God
Isaiah 40:9 Or Zion, bringer of good news, / go up on a high mountain. /

Jerusalem, bringer of good news
Isaiah 40:13 Or mind
New International Version (NIV)
Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978,

1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved

worldwide.