Iso 2553 s

1,053 views 63 slides Mar 10, 2020
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 63
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63

About This Presentation

predavanje


Slide Content

Square Groove Weld
Single V Groove Weld

Single Bevel Groove Weld
Single V Groove Weld with Broad Root Face

Single Bevel Groove Weld with Broad Root Face
Single U Groove Weld

Single J Groove Weld
Backing Weld

Fillet Weld
Plug / Slot Weld

Spot Weld
Seam Weld

Edge Weld
Surfacing

Flat
Convex Concave
Weld Profile

Toes blended
smoothly
Permanent
Backing Strip
M
Removable
Backing Strip
MR

Peripheral Welds

Site welds

Tail Optional)
Sequence of Information in the Tail
• Process (as per ISO 4063)
• Acceptance Level (as per ISO 5817 or ISO 10042)
• Working Position (as per ISO 6947)
• Filler Materials (as per ISO 544 or ISO 2560 or
ISO 3581)

Method of representation
Weld Joint
Arrow
Line
Reference Line (Continuous)
Reference Line (Dashed)

Welding on the Arrow Side
Arrow Side
Other Side

Welding on the Other Side
Arrow Side
Other Side

Welding on the Other Side
Other
Side
Arrow
Side

Welding on the Arrow Side
Other
Side
Arrow
Side

Which is the Other Side in this case?
Side A
Side C
Side B
Side D

Welding on both Sides
Other Side
Arrow Side

Symmetric Welding on both Sides

Pointing of Arrows for Bevel and J Joints
OR

Pointing of Arrows for Bevel and J Joints

Butt Joints
l
sl
s

Fillet Welds
z5l
5
5
a5l
5

Fillet Welds
a a a

Intermittent Fillet Welds
l
(e)
l
(e)
z n x l (e)
z n x l (e)

Staggered Intermittent Fillet Welds
z n x l (e)
z n x l (e)
l(e)l(e)
l (e)l(e)

Spot Weld
d n (e)
d
e e

Seam Weld
d n x l (e)
d
l e

Plug Weld
d n (e)
d
e e

Slot Weld
d n x l (e)
d
l
e

Poor penetration
Poor strength
Good penetration
Good strength
(100% joint
efficiency)

Factors which influence choice of edge preparation
-Thickness
-Material
-Welding process
-Extent of penetration required
-Welding distortion
-Cost

butt
tee
lap
corner
edge

Groove welds
Fillet weld
Plug / slot weld
Spot / seam weld

Square Groove weldV Groove weld
U Groove weldBevel Groove weld
J Groove weld

Double V Groove weld
Double U Groove weld
Double Bevel Groove weld
Double J Groove weld

Plug / slot weld
Spot / seam weld
Fillet weld

Edge weld

Square Groove weld
Root gap

Single V Groove weld
Groove angle 
Root face
Root gap

Correct
reinforcement
Minimum cost
Good joint
strength
Excess
reinforcement
High cost
Poor joint strength
Under
reinforcement
Poor joint strength

Weld from face side
Back gouging
Back weld

Backing weld
Back gouging

TIG / SMAW
welding
Consumable
guide

Less weld metal
Less distortion
Higher edge preparation cost
Better for thickness > 20 mm
More weld metal
More distortion
Lower edge preparation cost
Better for thickness < 20 mm
Double V groove
Single V groove

Good access at the root
Less weld metal
Higher edge preparation cost
Better for thickness > 40 mm
Groove angle
Root face
Root gap
Root radius

Double bevel groove
Single bevel groove
Bevel angle 40 to 50°
Difficult to approach
the root
Weld defects
Back gouging to
remove root defects
Good weld quality

Good access at the root
Back gouging and back welding to get good weld quality
Less weld metal
Higher edge preparation cost
Better for thickness > 40 mm

leg
leg throat
throat = 0.707 x leg
leg = 1.414 x throat
In a full strength
joint, leg = 0.75 x
thickness

leg = throat leg = throat
45°or 60°

Theoretical throat
Actual throat
AWS D 1.1 recommendation when gap > 1.6 mm –
to increase leg size of fillet by the amount of gap

AWS D 1.1 recommendation
Overlap = 5 x thickness (1 inch minimum)
Gap between mating faces = 1.6 mm max
overlap

1 G
2 G
3 G
4 G

1 G 2 G
5 G 6 G
45°

1F
2F
3F
4F

1F
2F
5F

Position Inclination of axisRotation of face
Flat 0°to 15° 150°to 210°
Horizontal 0°to 15° 80°to 150°
210°to 280°
Overhead 0°to 80° 0°to 80°
280°to 360°
Vertical 15°to 80° 80°to 280°
80°to 90° 0°to 360°

Position Inclination of axisRotation of face
Flat 0°to 15° 150°to 210°
Horizontal 0°to 15° 125°to 150°
210°to 235°
Overhead 0°to 80° 0°to 125°
235°to 360°
Vertical 15°to 80° 125°to 235°
80°to 90° 0°to 360°
Tags