of the religious-legal status of an Israelite. As though the atoning death of
Christ, in the usual dogmatic sense of the apostle, had not been most distinctly
indicated already before by the ἐν τῷ αἵματι τοῦ Χριστοῦ, Ephesians 2:13, as
afterwards by the ἀποκαταλλάξῃ κ.τ.λ., Ephesians 2:16, and by the
προσαγωγή, Ephesians 2:18! This meaning is not here, any more than at
Colossians 1:21 f., to be exegetically modified or explained away.
τῶν ἐντολῶν ἐν δόγμασι] to be taken together, yet not in such a way that ἐν
stands for σύν (Flatt) or καί (Koppe, Rosenmüller), but as: the law of the
commandments consisting in injunctions, whereby the dictatorial character of
the legal institute (as a whole, not merely partially, as Schenkel imports) is
exhibited. The genitive τῶν ἐντολῶν denotes the contents of the law, and ἐν
δόγμασι the essential form in which the ἐντολαί are given. The connecting link
of the article (τῶν) before ἐν δόγμασι was not requisite, since we may correctly
say: ἐντέλλεσθαί τι ἐν δόγματι or ἐντολὴν διδόναι ἐν δόγματι, and therefore
ἐντολὴ ἐν δόγματι may be conjoined so as to form one conception.[151] Comp.
on Ephesians 3:13; Romans 6:4; Galatians 4:14; Galatians 3:26. This view of
the connection is adopted, after the precedent of many older expositors, by
Rückert, Matthies, Meier, Winer, pp. 123, 197 [E. T. 169, 257], Bisping,
Schenkel, Bleek.[152] Comp. also Buttmann, neut. Cr. p. 80 [E. T. 92]. If one
should, with the Syriac, Arabic, Vulgate, Pelagius, Chrysostom and his
successors, Theodore of Mopsuestia, Grotius, Estius, Bengel, Holzhausen, and
others, including Fritzsche, Diss. in 2 Corinthians 2. p. 168 f., refer ἐν δόγμ. to
ΚΑΤΑΡΓΉΣΑς, there would result—even apart from the fact that with our
mode of connecting ἘΝ Τῇ ΣΑΡΚῚ ΑὐΤΟῦ, this construction is not even
possible—the wholly untrue and un-Pauline thought that Christ has through
injunctions abolished the law. No doubt some have imputed to ἐν δόγμασι the
sense praecepta stabiliendo (Fritzsche), in doing which they had in view the
evangelical doctrine of faith and the gratia universalis (see Chrysostom,
Theodore of Mopsuestia, Theodoret, Theophylact, Estius, Bengel, and others).
But even thus the sense remains untrue and un-Pauline, seeing that the doing
away of the law has taken place not at all in a doctrinal way, but by the fact of
the death of Christ (Romans 7:1 f.; Galatians 3:13; Colossians 2:14). And
what a change would be made in the meaning of the word δόγμα, which in the