Juvenile Courts

✍️

1. Juvenile Courts
There is a purpose for the court, and different types of courts. For example, there is a purpose, and a
scope with in the juvenile court (Cox, Allen, Hanser, & Conrad, 2014). This just means that each
state will customize what their needs are for juvenile court (Cox et al, 2014). This can be a good or
bad thing within the system. Furthermore, there has to be a purpose for the court. This is short
means the cases they will be hearing. This could mean abuse, delinquency, or family issues (Cox et
al, 2014). Another important thing to note is the differences between the adult court system, and the
juvenile court system. The adult court system can deal with things of arrest, hearing, arraignment,
criminal trial, etc. Where as the juvenile ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This means being able to protect the child from neglect, and abuse. In addition, to also be able to
rehabilitate them with treatment (Cox et al, 2014). Although this is very repetitive or cordial this can
also be more harming for the juvenile. This means that the juvenile could be working the system,
and learning how to get what they want (Cox et al, 2014). Another important aspect of the juvenile
court is keeping the families together (Cox et al, 2014). The only way the family will get separated
is when there is a very serious problem or danger towards the child (Cox et al, 2014). This is very
important to remember when looking at families. In addition, when looking at age each states is also
different from each other. For example the youngest age to convict a child of delinquency is 6 in
North Carolina (Cox et al, 2014). The oldest youngest age is 10 years old this is in Arkansas,
Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Texas, Vermont,
and Wisconsin (Cox et al, 2014). The oldest age for this is 17 years old and this occurs in Alabama,
Alaska, Pennsylvania, and Wyoming to name a few (Cox et al,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

3. Persuasive Essay On Juvenile Courts
Juvenile courts was first court held in Chicago in 1899 , established its name also known as
children's court. These courts handle problems from abuse, neglected, and delinquent children.
Juvenile courts are providing a rehabilitation resources and process for people up to the age of
eighteen, Recently, many states have made have a made a policy change increasing the age for
juveniles. For many reasons, studies have shown that teens are more likely to have a successful
transitioning from juvenile justice system rather than the adult criminal justice system. The whole
point of age limit is because it creates a better outcome for the public, and gets the family and
community involved. You still are young and have room for a behavior change ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, they need to do what's right and it gives them a wake up call. While going to prison they
are being punished have already passed the juvenile stages and are stuck in their ways. Juvenile
court system help the child and parent connect. They make the child see how they are being affected
and their parents. It is often questioned if juvenile courts prevent children from going to the adult
system. I believe it gives the child a chance to see and make a choice as to whether or not they are
going to exhibit good
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

5. Juvenile Court Case Study
In the State of Tennessee, a juvenile is considered under the age of eighteen and has not been
transferred to adult court (TN Court, n.d.). The state law that governs expungement of juvenile
records in Tennessee is Tennessee Code Annotated (T.C.A.) 37–1–506. T.C.A. 37–1–506 states that
the council appointed by the state "shall develop guidelines and procedures to expunge identifying
information collected on juveniles; provided, that such expunction shall occur only after the juvenile
reaches the age that is beyond jurisdiction of the juvenile court" (Lexis Nexis, 2017). This is
required to be reported every year by September 1st. Upon receipt of an order of expungement of
the charge for which the child was placed on county probation or received prevention services "the
department shall expunge that child's information from ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The T.C.A. that governs juvenile convictions to be sentenced as an adult is T.C.A. 37–1–134,
Transfer from Juvenile Court. For a child to be sentenced as an adult in Tennessee, he or she has to
be "sixteen (16) years or more of age at the time of the alleged conduct, or the child was less than
sixteen (16) years of age if such child was charged with the offense of first degree murder, second
degree murder, rape, aggravated rape, rape of a child, aggravated rape of a child, aggravated
robbery, especially aggravated robbery, kidnapping, aggravated kidnapping, especially aggravated
kidnapping, commission of an act of terrorism, or an attempt to commit any such offenses" (Lexis
Nexis, 2017). In the State of Tennessee, a child that meets these requirements to be tried as an adult
cannot be sentenced to death if found guilty. In order for county to get approval to try the child as an
adult, a hearing must be held and the court must have probable cause that the child committed the
alleged act, the child is not mentally ill
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

7. Juvenile Court Case Analysis
It is possible for some juveniles to be transferred out of the juvenile justice system and into the adult
or criminal court system but the process is multifaceted. Each state varies on the age in which a
juvenile can be waived to the adult court system. Juveniles that are transferred to the adult court
system have a number of reasons for this to happen. Generally they are transferred because it is
believed that it is not appropriate for the juvenile to be processed in juvenile court and that they will
be dealt with more to all intents and purposes in adult court. When a juvenile commits a violent
felony, they have placed themselves in the same category for which an adult receives their
punishment for the offense that they committed. There are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Once the prosecutor and/or juvenile judge has introduced the waiver petition, it does not
automatically occur, there has to be a waiver hearing and the prosecutor has to prove that the
juvenile defendant in fact committed the crime. In Tennessee, T.C.A. § 37–1–134, "the court must
find reasonable grounds to believe that (i) the child committed the delinquent act as alleged, (ii) the
child is not committable to an institution for the intellectually disabled or mentally ill, and (iii) the
interests of the community require that the child be put under legal restraint or discipline. Regarding
subdivision (b)(3) and § 37–1–134, it has been held by both the Tennessee Court of Appeals and
Court of Criminal Appeals that, although the burden of proof is on the prosecution on such issue,
there is a presumption of non–committability similar to that relating to sanity in criminal trials. Such
presumption can be rebutted by evidence introduced by the defendant, and in such event the burden
would shift back to the prosecution to persuade the court the child is not committable. See Howell v.
Hodge, 710 F.3d 381, 386 (6th Cir.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

9. Juvenile Court Law
The Juvenile Court Law of 1961 made cutoff revolves and particular treatment around particular
adolescents for law utilize, court structure and probation division. Events of different youngsters are
as taken after good 'ol fashioned delinquents which execute certifiable infringement like burglary
and robbery murder and things of that nature of course we had status committed get–togethers.
Status subject social events are is a wrongdoing that solitary applies to youths a few cases are
making tracks in an opposite direction from home, not going to class or getting wild at home. It
made two separate Welfare and Institution codes that allowed law execution experts to segregate on
an extremely fundamental level the really stunning ones and not too
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

11. Juvenile Court Research Paper
Juvenile Courts Juvenile courts are courts that handle cases involving minors in the United States. In
New York and North Carolina anyone under sixteen and above are considered adults, and in twelve
other states it is seventeen years old. They cover cases dealing with children who are delinquents,
have been abused, or neglected. This court is a specialty court. A specialty court is a court that is
more of a problem–solving court, it has jurisdiction over one specific area of criminal activity. There
are many interesting topics to be discussed involving the juvenile courts. Such topics include its
history as well as the many benefits that comes with Juvenile courts. History of Juvenile Courts In
the early 1800s children offenders were going
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

13. Juvenile Courts Essay
There is ongoing debate as to what should be done with juvenile courts. Should juvenile courts be
abolished or just reformed? There are a number of reasons offered for each viewpoint, and the
ultimate goal is trying to figure out which option would be most beneficial for juveniles. Juvenile
delinquency is a continuous problem in the United States. It is also considered an issue that all of
society needs to take part in trying to solve or at least diminish. Despite the number of social
controls that can aid in dealing with delinquency much of the burden is placed on the juvenile
justice system. It is well understood that the juvenile courts have a lot of imperfections. These
imperfections are what caused the calls for reform or ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
This shift has caused more focus on an individual as a criminal rather than the innocence of a child.
It also caused movement away from rehabilitation, which was meant as a way to prevent future
criminality. More emphasis has been placed on strict social control and incarceration (Hickey,
2010). In a sense reforming back to the original objectives of juvenile courts is seen as one of the
better methods to try and achieve. As of now the juvenile court system is suffering from a
boomerang effect in which the same juveniles are continuously reoffending. The point of
rehabilitating juveniles when they are in adolescence is to try to prevent adult criminal behavior.
Juvenile courts have failed to substantially make an impact on juvenile delinquency as they are now
and reforms may not be enough to make a significant impact. Ultimately, a bigger change may be
required.
In addition to the rehabilitative aspect is the social welfare aspect. The juvenile courts lack the
means to provide social welfare for children. This issue was created because of state agencies
having the "control over the institutions and programs to which judges send delinquents," rather
than juvenile courts having the control (Hickey, 2010, p. 148). The lack of resources
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

15. Juvenile To Adult Court Essay
In today society there are many juveniles being sent to adult court for the crimes they committed.
When a juvenile is sent to criminal court the juvenile can more likely be found guilty and receive
harsher punishment than the adults that commits the same crime and any juvenile that is convicted
and sentenced in juvenile court. Depending on which State the juvenile is located in depends on if
the juvenile is automatically will be sent to criminal court. The question remains is should a juvenile
be transferred to adult courts for the crime that has been committed? The juvenile might not be
mature enough to understand the crime they committed, have psychologic issues or any other
underlying issues for when the crime was committed. The age ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Only thirteen states set the age limit of 15 and 16, any youth that is older than that is automatically
transferred to adult court for the crime they commit. The minimum age to transfer a juvenile to adult
court various between states but only two states have set a limit and those states are Kansas is age
10 and New Mexico is age 15. Another state including the District of Columbia there is no minimum
age unless it is a heinous crime such as murder, then the juvenile is automatically transferred to
criminal court. In addition, there was 15 states in 2004, who has concurrent jurisdiction from
juvenile to adult court upon sentencing a juvenile. This is where if a juvenile commits a crime they
are tried as a juvenile either in juvenile court or be tried in criminal court but upon sentencing they
are sentenced to juvenile jail/prison then upon them turning 18 they are then transferred to adult
prison where they will serve out their remainder of their time. This will be for serious offense like
murder, drug offenses, assault against another person. In 2004, 29 states have "statutory exclusion"
provisions, which means that any serious crimes are excluded by law to be tried in juvenile court.
With these situations any crime that is committed there is exclusions on where a juvenile is tried and
served their sentence for all crimes. For any serious offense that happens, then the juvenile will be
sent to criminal court automatically or after a certain
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

17. Juvenile Court System
The first juvenile court in the United States was established in Chicago in 1899. The first juvenile
court in the state of Georgia was in Fulton County in 1911, now there is one in every county.
Juvenile courts in Georgia are controlled by a 1971 law known as the juvenile code. The philosophy
of the juvenile courts is to protective of the child rather than punitive. The court must do what is best
for the interest of the child while considering the best interest of society.
An example of the system is, children are no longer "sentenced"; they are subject to a "disposition,"
and the focus in the juvenile system is not on punishment or retribution but rehabilitation and
restitution. The causes and conditions of delinquency are obvious: poverty, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
With this act only the most serious and violent offenders would be kept in custody. The youth with
misdemeanors would be diverted into specialized programs working to manage their core problems.
There would also be alternatives to detention through initiatives by minimizing the use of secure
detention centers while preserving the community, reduce racial and ethical disputes, minimize the
re–arrest and failure to appear rates pending adjudication. Try and encourage the juveniles so they
know and care about their future to be positive. "There are five approaches to punishment they are
deterrence, rehabilitation, incapacitation, retribution, and vengeance (Nina)." Deterrence is used to
guide a person from committing a criminal act out of fear of punishment. Rehabilitation is to
counter criminal recidivism. Incapacitation is keeping the offender off the streets while removing
the ability for him to commit future crimes. In retribution the punishment should fit the crime and
the criminal should give something up for the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

19. Juvenile Court Research Paper
Juvenile Court Jurisdiction "Once and Adult, Always an Adult" (NCSL.ORG). I feel the maxium
age of Juvenile court jurisdiction should be 15 years old. The reason I say that because once a child
reached pubertity they know whats right and wrong, if the system keep making excuses for them
when they commit a serious crime they just going end back up in juvenile. For example if a child
kill somebody with a gun, that child knew what the consequences was before they pull trigger on the
gun. If we keep saying they kids and they don't deserve that harsh punishment, once they reach adult
hood then what you going say. If you don't punish the child now than its going be hard to punish
them later.However I feel like any child under ten should not get sent to juvenile or be trial in court
as a juvenile. The reason I say that because on page (7) the book talks about that "any person
younger than minium age of juvenile court are believed to lack the ability to know whats right and
wrong". I agree with the book because how can you tell a child that's 8 years old they going juvenile
because they did something wrong. Just because the child commit the act that child brain level and
maturity level is not up there to understand what they did. Everybody maturity level is not the same,
you can be 8 years old but ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The reason I say that because when a child is six years old they barely know how to say they name
or write they name. so how we going try a child at the age of six with a crime they really don't know
about or understand why they do it. I feel like once you reach the age of 10 you have a little bit of
common sense to know what you doing, at the time you commit the crime you might not know but
later on you will undertstand. But a six year old will never understand because they cant even tell
you why they did
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

21. The Juvenile Court System
Introduction Millions of juveniles are processed through the juvenile court system, and the number
has been growing for years. Judges and court officials have been looking for many ways to come up
with alternatives to incarceration. There are several different alternatives to incarceration for
juveniles currently that will be discussed. Incarceration has an impact on the society as well, even
for those who have not been in trouble with the law before which is one of the reasons why
alternatives have been evolved. Tensions between the established principals and the proposed
methods determined the way in which early incarceration alternatives were introduced into
legislation.
Historical and Economic Reasoning During the nineteenth century is ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
It is less cost effective than imprisonment to have juveniles be sanctioned with alternatives.
Alternatives also helped with prison crowding and lowered the tax percentages tremendously. The
society itself plays a big part on how individuals chose the paths that they did. If they live in poverty
stricken neighborhoods, there is more of a chance of crime, than the suburbs. There are programs
such as the big brother, big sister program that is community oriented. These individuals volunteer
to spend time with juveniles to help them make the right choices. This program alone is an
enormous societal benefit for those juveniles that are in the system. Individual benefits speak for
themselves; juveniles are out in the community and have their freedom. My opinion is that probation
is a scare tactic. These juveniles are placed on probation and sent back into the society knowing
their guidelines and the consequences if they are not followed. Juveniles get a second chance to get
their act together, and if they mess up again then, they will go back to jail and get everything taken
from them. It is also a benefit to the family because they get to have their child at home and do not
have to deal with the stress of the court, and trying to get their children home. These juveniles are
put on a path through the juvenile justice
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

23. The Juvenile Court System
Juvenile Crime What is juvenile crime? Juvenile crime or juvenile delinquency is when a crime is
committed when the person in question is a minor, or under the legal age of 18. In order to address
this question we must look at the history and what lead to the creation of a juvenile system. To
answer the main question, two other questions need to be answered; how is the Juvenile court
system different than the adult system and what is the classification of a juvenile? The history of the
juvenile system took a long time to evolve to what it is today. The system began in 1899 when the
juvenile court system was just beginning to form. According to the University of Nebraska, "Prior to
that time, young people committing criminal offenses ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
One area discussed is the drastic difference between the maturity level of an adult and a juvenile
brain. According to The Handbook of Defiance, "Recent research on brain development supports
these assertions, with that part of the brain responsible for the regulation of behavior not being fully
developed until the mid–twenties. (The handbook of defiance, 311)." With this information about
the minors brain being underdeveloped, the court system recognizes they should not be held to the
same standards that adults are held to. Another difference that defines the consequences for minors
is status offences. A status offense is a crime committed by a person not considered an adult. If an
adult did the same act, it would not be an illegal act (ie. smoking cigarettes.) According to The
Handbook of Defiance, "Until the early 1970s, status offenders were sometimes subject to severe
sanction, including institutional confinement. The law now places limitations on the sanctions that
can be given to status offenders; a few states have decriminalized status offences, although the
police arrest tens of thousands of juveniles for status offences each year, and some are confined."
(The handbook of defiance, 312). These offences involve running away from home, alcohol use,
truancy, certain sexual acts, and several others. The impulsive acts are other examples that the minor
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

25. Favor Of Abolishing Juvenile Court
Proponents of abolishing juvenile court claim that all crimes should be treated the same and children
are no exception. They also claim that because a punishment is supposed to fit the crime teenagers
who have committed high–level crimes deserve to be tried as adults. Another popular claim is that
the adult court system lowers juvenile recidivism. What these individuals fail to see is the
psychological trauma that adult courts have on adolescents. Instead of being tried as adults, children
should be tried in juvenile because children's brains are not fully developed, there are flexible
sentences, and juvenile courts allow for more rehabilitation. First, children do not have the
necessary brain development to comprehend the court ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Proponents of the abolition of juvenile court fail to realize that even teenagers do not have the
emotional development to fully understand what is happening. According to Robin Nixon,
adolescents have an entirely new set of intense emotions which makes rational decision harder. She
reported, " Part of the limbic system, the amygdala is thought to connect sensory information to
emotional responses. Its development, along with hormonal changes, may give rise to newly intense
experiences of rage, fear, aggression (including toward oneself), excitement and sexual attraction"
(Nixon). These intense emotions cause adolescents to act irrationally. To say that teenagers have the
emotional stability and maturity to be tried as an adult is preposterous. There are many problems
that arise when a child is tried in adult court. These issues surface as emotional breakdowns, a lack
of remorse, and even aggression. The harsh environment of an adult court does not mix with a
child's emotional needs. Emotional breakdowns stem from nervousness and guilt while a lack of
remorse stems from younger children failing to understand what they did and aggression is an
automatic response to what is happening around these children. Instead of treating them as adults,
the justice system needs to keep the juvenile justice court in order to give these children a fair trial
and rehabilitation. Second, children should be tried in juvenile court because of the flexible
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

27. Juvenile Court Case Paper
1. Due to his age Andrew, 11 years old, will have juvenile delinquency charges brought against him.
According to Section 5–120 Exclusive Jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987 legal
proceedings may be brought against any minor "who prior to his or her 18th birthday has violated or
attempted to violate, regardless of whether the act occurred, any federal, State, county or municipal
law or ordinance. Except as provided in Sections 5–125, 5–130, 5–805, and 5–810 of this Article, no
minor who was under the age of 18 years of age at the time of the alleged offense may be prosecuted
under the criminal laws of this state." This means that children under the age of 18 are exempt from
being tried as an adult if they fail to meet the qualifications ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Being placed in the guardianship of DCFS also carries with it the possibility of being placed in the
Department of Juvenile Justice under Section 3–10–11 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1987. The
sentence to IDOJJ means that Andrew could be placed in "any program or facility of the Department
of Juvenile Justice, or any juvenile residential facility." Furthermore "a minor transferred under this
Section shall remain in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice until the Department of
Juvenile Justice determines that the minor is ready to leave its program." Once it is determined that
the juvenile is ready to leave IDOJJ, a transition plan will be put in place with cooperation from
DCFS "to move the minor to an alternative program." With this sentence option, a minor transferred
to IDOJJ cannot "remain in the custody of the Department of Juvenile Justice for a period of time in
excess of that period for which an adult could be committed for the same act." This means that
Andrew could spend an undisclosed amount of time in IDOJJ custody. The length of his sentence
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

29. Juvenile Court Case Study
The American Juvenile justice system is where youth, who are caught in a criminal act, are
convicted of their crimes. The juvenile justice system also intervenes using the police, court and
correctional facility for delinquent behavior. The juvenile justice system was not always around. In
1824 The House of Refuge was opened in New York. This was the first attempt to separate children
and adults. Before this, children as young as 7 who were convicted of crimes were put in prison with
adults. The Juvenile Justice system was established in 1899 in the United States. The first case was
heard in Illinois. The Illinois Juvenile Court Act of 1899 created the first juvenile court system with
authority and jurisdiction over abused, neglected, delinquent, ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The youth will enter a plea agreement. Normally a plea agreement depends solely on the juvenile's
willingness to follow the set out conditions. Such as a part of the plea agreement could be that the
juvenile could have to obey curfews, pay the victim for damages or attend counseling. If there is not
plea agreement then the judge could divert the case, which means, the judge keeps jurisdiction over
the case while the child goes through a recommended program like, counseling or community
service. If the child doesn't complete the program the court could bring back formal charges. If the
case is severe then the case will go to trial, in a juvenile case it is call an adjudicatory hearing. Just
like an adult criminal trial, both sides will present their evidence and argue the case. Most states the
cases are only heard by a judge not by a jury. If the judge determines the youth is delinquent or guilt,
then a probation officer will evaluate the child. The judge will then decide the best course of
punishment or rehabilitation, including, counseling, locked up in a juvenile detention facility, pay
back the victim or probation. The judge could also order the child to return to court periodically to
see if the child's behavior is
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

31. Juvenile Court Case Study
The juvenile court appears to be organized similar to criminal court but with a few different terms.
One of the main differences is that a juvenile is being tried for a delinquent act, not a crime – unless
the delinquent act was very serious, than the juvenile can be tried for a crime in adult court. This is
not an option for adults in criminal court, they can't be "downgraded" to a delinquent act because the
crime may not be very serious.
In my opinion, the predisposition writer should begin their participation immediately following an
arraignment hearing should the juvenile plead not guilty. At this point in the process, the juvenile
claims the crime he or she is innocent of committing the crime they have been charged with and
now the court, the lawyers, investigators, and all parties involved should begin the process of
finding the truth. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The investigation process is handled by more than one person. Generally, the police will investigate
the crime – although usually before a court hearing, but investigating can continue past a court
hearing (e.g. cold cases, The Innocence Project, etc.). Another individual in charge of investigating
is the predisposition writer who must investigate the youth's history, background, schooling, family,
friends, and more. Investigation can take time, but time can be the enemy as the court won't sit
around waiting for you to get around to investigating. Consider all the information the
predisposition writer must process and the interviews that must take place before the report can be
written. All of this can take time, especially when you start to think about interviewing all the people
involved and working around their
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

33. Youth's Rehabilitation In The Juvenile Court
State laws and judicial norms were customary with the understanding that the protection of the
privacy of juveniles adjudicated in the juvenile court is a serious factor of the youth's rehabilitation.
However, in the face of increasing public concerns over juvenile crime and violence, government
agencies, school officials, the public, and victims are seeking more information about juvenile
offenders. An increasing number of States are responding to this need by allowing public access to
and victim participation in juvenile proceedings, broadening access to juvenile records,
fingerprinting and photographing delinquent youth, and altering expungement laws for juvenile
records. With juvenile crimes, becoming more prevalent and increasingly violent,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

35. What Is The Juvenile Court System
The juvenile law in America's system was created on the premise that due to young people's
immaturity, the crimes they have committed should be handled in a different manner from those
ascribed to adults. The young people were mostly under the age of eighteen. The key basis was to
address the cause of their misdemeanors and to ultimately restore their responsible membership
within the community (Bernard, 2012). Juvenile courts date back to the late nineteenth and early
twentieth century. In the United States, juvenile courts vary in structure and organization, but all
serve the common goal of rehabilitating young people. One of the most obvious concerns that
people in the area struggle with is that an overwhelming majority of the leaders in
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

37. The Procedures Of Juvenile Court
The Pretrial Procedures of Juvenile Court Detention hearing process has been frown upon and
detested ever since juvenile courts were created. The original purpose of detention was to hold the
juvenile in a secure location until intake could review the child's case and make a decision.
Intake process is extremely useful to juvenile court and holds for several purposes. Case dismissal,
informal adjustments, informal probation, consent decree, and petition are the five procedure
purposes that the intake process provides.
The transfer procedure deals with adolescents being transferred to an adult prison because of the
concern over the violent crimes they commit. This procedure is seen to be very serious due to the
fact that a child is ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The way the adolescent acts toward to police officer and whatever crime they commit manipulates
that classification.
The second stop is to a intake personal. They review the case and decide whether or not the child
should go to juvenile court, but just like police officer, they have the option to release the child to
their parents.
The final point decides whether the young juvenile should be sentenced to a residential or
nonresidential facility after proven being guilty.
With all the criticism that detention hearing receive, they do serve for some purpose. By taking the
young delinquent through a series of processes, it allows several people to look over the case to get
the best evaluation over the crime that was committed. The three point system in the end helps to
determine the best sanction that the juvenile should serve in until their hearing.
Intake Process Case dismissal occurs when either the case is too weak to actually bring to court, if
this is the youth's first offense and they seem actually sorry for what they did, and if the parents
agree to reach out for help for their child. With a case dismissal, "Often this review takes place with
the police officer, the youths' parents, and perhaps the prosecutors and the youths' lawyers present"
(Bartollas & Miller, p.131).
Informal adjustments have three separate options, one being that intake personnel simply lets the
child go to their parents,

38. ... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

40. Methods Of Transfer In Juvenile Court
Methods of Transfer One of the most extreme responses to serious juvenile offenses involves the
transfer of juveniles to adult court. Transfer laws and statutes vary significantly from state to state,
particularly in terms of flexibility and extent of coverage. There are three methods in which juvenile
cases can be transferred to adult court: judicial waiver, concurrent jurisdiction, and statutory
exclusion. Judicial Waiver In a judicial waiver, a judge determines the transfer from juvenile to adult
court. Judicial waiver laws allow juvenile courts to waive jurisdiction on a case–by–case basis,
opening the way for criminal prosecution. A case that is subject to judicial waiver is filed in juvenile
court. Following a hearing, the case may
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

42. Juvenile Court Case Study
In the Juvenile Case #1, the client suspected of burglarizing and murdering the elderly lady should
be tried in a Juvenile Court rather Adult court which would be in the best interest of the child. To
begin with, the client has no juvenile delinquent record and had minimal behavioral issues in the
Juvenile Hall, which aids to their side since they have a clean history and this is the first record of
criminal behavior. With this in mind, it is plausible for the minor to change to become a better
civilian through rehabilitation which is made possible by the Juvenile court. The client has proved
their ability to improve themselves by earning a high school diploma and attending voluntary
treatment programs which shows the success of the juvenile ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The suspect was only 14 years old when placed into custody, where they are young enough to still
be considered an adolescent and don't know right from wrong. For a young client that was born
addicted to meth and abandoned at birth, they must have a poor mental and emotional state that
exists within them. Without having a biological mother or father figure in their life, they lack
guidance in identifying what is wrong and what is right and what the consequences of their actions
are due to the poor parental supervision they were exposed to while growing up. Alongside, the lack
of parental support and supervision while growing up the minor is proven to suffer from
psychological disorders such as ADHD, insomnia, and anti–social tendencies which affects their
mental and emotional health. With the client having no gang ties or association, this greatly
increases the likelihood that they will rehabilitate since they carry no ties with other gang members
or criminals. Next, the minor did not originally have the intent to stab and murder the elderly lady
before entering the home. As the client retrieved a deadly kitchen knife from inside the house, rather
than bringing their own weapon shows how this was not a planned premeditated murder. This
proves that a rather spontaneous and unpredicted action was committed by the juvenile that could
have been triggered by their poor mental and emotional state. In the end, due to the minimal degree
of criminal sophistication that exists in the minor they should be initiated under the juvenile court
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

44. Juvenile Justice System And The Juvenile Court System
The juvenile justice system varies from the adult justice system in many ways. For more than a
century, the states have believed that the juvenile justice system was a means to ensuring public
safety, by establishing and implementing a system that responds to children as they are maturing
into adulthood. Today's youths, however, are increasingly committing more serious crimes that in
turn are raising the public's criticism concerning the modern juvenile justice system. There are those
who are in support of keeping every juvenile I juvenile court system and then there are the others
who argue if juveniles were held to stricter standards they would not become repeat offender in the
system and eventual end up in the adult corrections system. ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
The Department of Justice confirms juveniles are entitled to Fifth Amendment protection under the
Constitution, against self–incrimination in juvenile proceedings. This is despite the nature of the
crime whether it is of criminal or non–criminal nature of those proceedings. (In re Gault, 1967)
Substance, not form, controls in determining the relevance of the Fifth Amendment to proceedings
not labeled criminal. Therefor since a juvenile defendant 's liberty is at stake, the Fifth Amendment
would apply. The next question that then arises is does the juvenile have the mental capacity to
understand their Fifth Amendment rights, that was explained to them when the officer first read
them their Miranda Admonishment. Under California law, prosecutors who allege that a minor
under the age of 14 has committed a criminal act, the courts must establish that the child can
distinguish between right and wrong. The minor must also know what it means to break the law or
commit a crime. (In re Gladys R., 1970)
Juveniles are not necessarily given every right afforded to adult criminal defendants. Let's take a
look at the right to "a trial by jury". Juveniles do not have the right to a jury trial instead a Judge
decides the juvenile cases. (McKeiver v. Pennsylvania, 1971) Taking into account that this is a worst
case scenario, a minor adjudicated in juvenile court can face being sentenced to the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

46. Juvenile Court System
The issue of juvenile delinquency being addressed in a separate court system is a fairly new
procedure. The first juvenile court system was established in Chicago, IL in 1899. Before that
children who committed offenses were tried and punished as adults. If a person is under the age of
18 and they break the law they will be tried in a juvenile court unless it is an offense of a very
serious caliber. No matter what the offense the juvenile criminal court was created to ensure all
juveniles are taught a lesson for their actions. Two separate court systems means different
procedures and wording is used. The juvenile court and and the adult court are both places where
judges make decisions on the approach to take when a person has broken the law. ... Show more
content on Helpwriting.net ...
The main difference is that when a judge is sentencing a juvenile they take into considerations
multiple factors including the severity of the offense, the age of the offender, the mental stability of
the juvenile among other factors. But when a judge is sentencing an adult they are going to punish
them for the offense committed without consideration of whether the offender can be rehabilitated
or not. There are instances where a juvenile can be tried as an adult in an adult court. But there are
still considerations taken before this decision can be made. The landmark case of Kent v United
States brought about some of the differences between the two court systems when it comes to
transferring a juvenile to be tried in an adult court. In order for a juvenile to be transferred to an
adult court there are certain factors that need to be met. The main factor is the seriousness of the
offense committed by the juvenile offender. Another factor is to determine the likelihood the
juvenile can be rehabilitated and the consideration of any prior criminal history or record. All of
these differences have made a huge impact on how a juvenile is determined fit to be tried in an adult
court. I think these decisions have changed things for the better. In one part the needs of juveniles
who can be rehabilitated can be met and in another part those offenders who show signs of
becoming adult criminals
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

48. Essay on Juvenile and Adult Courts
Juvenile and Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis
Zanetta Eave, Tasha Harris, and Lee Blackmon
CJA/374
July 29, 2013
Cory Kelly
Introduction The "Juvenile and Adult Courts: A Comparative Analysis" paper will compare juvenile
courts with adult courts. This paper will present an overview of the juvenile justice system, a point–
by–point comparison between juvenile and adult courts. The adjudication process by which a
juvenile is transferred to the adult court system. This paper will also discuss the implications of the
following for youthful offenders: The trend of increasing the use of waivers, and the trend of
remanding juveniles to adult court for processing. The last topic addressed in this paper will be the
societal implications ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
If a plea agreement is not reached, the case may go to an Adjudication Hearing (also called Fact–
finding. All parties to the case, including the prosecution witnesses and defense witnesses, will be
subpoenaed (summoned) to testify before a Judge. Witnesses may be excluded from the courtroom
until they are finished testifying (Clallam County, 2011). The argument for this rule is to ensure that
a witness is not influenced by the testimony of another witness. If you are a victim, you have the
right to be present throughout the hearing. Since there are no jury trials in juvenile court, the Judge
will determine whether or not the juvenile is innocent or guilty of committing a delinquent act after
hearing the facts of the case. At the Adjudication Hearing, the prosecution and the defense may
make opening statements to the Judge to explain the case. The Juvenile Prosecutor then presents the
case against the juvenile respondent. It is the responsibility of the State to prove "beyond a
reasonable doubt" that a delinquent act was committed and the juvenile respondent is guilty of
committing the act (Clallam County, 2012). To meet this burden of proof, the Juvenile Prosecutor
presents evidence and calls witnesses to testify. Witnesses are required to testify under oath and may
be cross–examined by the juvenile's defense attorney.
After the prosecutor presents the case against the juvenile respondent, the defense
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

50. Juvenile Court Purpose
Throughout the times there have been arguments in which have been made for the separation of
courts for youths and juvenile delinquents. Juvenile court is a special court, which deals with
underage defendant whom are charged with crimes are neglected or are out of control of their
parents. Throughout the following essay I will be discussing the purpose of the juvenile court, and
whether or not that the purpose is being served today. Purpose for Juvenile Court There was once a
time in which juveniles were treated just as adults. There were no such things as juvenile justice
system and there was very little progress in which was being incorporated. Originally the court
process was informal, nothing more than a simple conversation between the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

52. Juvenile Delinquency And The Court System
When a juvenile faces the court system in the United States it is much different than when an adult
faces the court system. The main concern for a juvenile is not to get the punishment they may
deserve but rather the court system focuses on treatment. They do this by using rehabilitation as a
major tool, not to try and get them healthy per say, but rather to create better choices for the juvenile
in the future. This includes the court system looking into the juvenile's past history along with a
psychological approach in order to meet his or her needs. The juvenile then faces a hearing which
involves looking into not only the juvenile's history, but also social needs in order to better
accommodate them for their "healing" process. On the other ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Since 2006 the most common trend I could find was that juveniles have had a steady decrease in
violent crimes. After researching the office of juvenile justice and prevention website, I noticed that
in the last 10 years juveniles have dipped from almost 300,000 violent crime arrests to a low of less
than 200,000. Most of the juveniles detained happen to be male. On a study done in 2013 there were
86% males in juvenile residential placement and this trend has been pretty steady since 1997. As far
as different delinquency goes for different crimes, 25 percent of the juveniles placed in a residential
placement had severe crimes, 19 percent had had crimes that pertain to some kind of property
crimes, and most of the rest delinquents had smaller crimes such as drug related offenses or even
smaller crimes like disturbing the peace. What shocked me was that only 1 percent of juvenile
delinquents had been detained for criminal homicide. As far as race goes the most delinquent
juveniles are non–Hispanic black. It was by a large margin. For example, in second place the
American Indian race had roughly 496,000 juveniles in residential placement but non–Hispanic
black people had 804,000 juveniles in residential placement. On the other side of the spectrum,
coming in last place (in this case a very good thing), Asian's only had roughly 49,000 juveniles in
residential placement. Another common trend was the older you get the more likely you will end up
being a delinquent. In 2013, at the age of 17 there were 360,000 delinquents and only 46,000 at the
age of 13. As far as what type of crime these delinquents are causing it was pretty broad but as far as
person on person crimes go, the most likely crime to happen was robbery but not by much, others
included that were pretty close were, sexual assault and simple assault. When it came to property
crimes the most likely to occur happened to be burglary, and by
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

54. Juvenile Court Case Study
Some landmark case that made a different with juvenile in adult prison is the People ex rel.
O'Connell v. Turner (1870). According to Chapter 6 Jails: Way Stations Along the Justice Highway
it states, "The Illinois Supreme Court began the movement towards creating a separate juvenile
court"(Way Stations Along the Justice Highway ,2015). This was the change that started to isolate
the adult and the youth from being in the same cell in prison. Kent V. United States (1966) is another
case that made in impact with the juveniles in the system. According to Corrections in the 21st
century by Schmalleger and Smykla (2001) states, "In cases involving transfer of jurisdiction,
juveniles are entitled to certain essential due process right, such as a hearing, an attorney, access to
records, a written ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Another case that Schmalleger and Smykla state is the "In re Gault (1967) Juvenile offenders have
the right to reasonable notice of charges, appointed counsel, question witnesses, and protection
against self–incrimination"(Schmalleger & Smykla, 2011). The case helped juveniles from self–
incrimination because even juvenile needs to know what are the charges against them. Another case
is In re Winship (1970) in the text Chapter 6 Jails: Way Stations Along the Justice Highway it states,
"The guilty beyond a reasonable doubt standard should be required in all delinquency adjudications"
(Way Stations Along the Justice Highway ,2015). In this case the same standards that goes for the
adult they wanted the same for a juveniles. Chapter 6 Jails: Way Stations Along the Justice Highway
it states, "Breed v. Jones (1975) The double jeopardy protection applies to juvenile adjudication
proceedings "(Way Stations Along the Justice Highway ,2015). Just like in the case In re Winship,
Breed v Jones also want the same standards for
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

56. Blended Sentencing In Juvenile Courts
In the United States, though different states have different transfer laws regarding ways a juvenile
could be transferred to criminal court, most states used one of these transfer laws; once adult/always
adult laws, reverse waiver laws and blended sentencing laws. Under once adult/always adult laws, a
juvenile who have been tried as adults will be prosecuted in criminal court for any subsequent
offenses. Reverse waiver laws, on the other hand, makes it possible for juvenile who is being
prosecuted as an adult in criminal court to appeal their case to be transferred to juvenile court. A
compromise between those who wanted rehabilitation and those who wanted punishment for the
juvenile offender, blended sentencing laws appear to be the law that could determine the appropriate
Court of Jurisdiction for juveniles. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Indeed, blended sentencing is considered a good law, but, in Washington, there is a law called
Washington State Juvenile Disposition Guidelines Manual that is even better. In Washington State
Juvenile Disposition Guidelines Manual, a uniform set of statutory guidelines – subject to the
provision of RCW Chapter 13.40, the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, is used to determine the
appropriate standard sentence range for an offense. These guidelines include various sanctions and
conditions promoting accountability and rehabilitation. Although juvenile blended sentencing is
thought to be lenient yet appropriate in determining if a person should be tried as an adult or
juvenile, a standard guideline that is more uniform and fair, like Washington State Juvenile
Disposition Guidelines Manual should be used to determine the appropriate Court of
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

58. Juvenile Court Statistics Report
"Since 1929, when the first Juvenile Court Statistics report was published using 1927 data,
probation has been the overwhelming dispositional choice of juvenile and family court judges"
(Torbet, 1996, p. 1). The juvenile justice policies shift from just desert to treatment. (Torbet, 1996)
Probation is the disposition of choice with juvenile offenders; however, probation purposes was
based solely on the goal of rehabilitating the juvenile offender because institutional confinement
builds stigma and social environment issues. (Davies & Davidson, 2001) And this was a way to
establish parental involvement. Juveniles do not have as many programs and resources, which
probation officers are faced with a lack of resources to provide for youths, not ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Therefore, courts did not want to see juveniles continue to become repeat offenses. Judges have
discretion in sentencing and reviewing all factors such as the seriousness of the crime, the age of the
child, and the duty to protect the public. (Latessa & Smith, 2011) The rise in juvenile caseload led to
probation disposition thus giving juveniles another chance. (Latessa & Smith, 2011) The primary
goals of probation became to assist youths in dealing with their individual problems and social
environments. Juvenile probation was to provide guidance such as counseling, resources, and
supervision to low–risk juveniles to adapt to constructive living, thus avoiding the necessity of
institutionalization that creates stigma. (Latessa & Smith, 2011) However, probation is less
expensive than incarceration and somewhat effective in reducing the further delinquent behavior.
(Torbet, 1996) When community–based programs such as probation were correctly implemented,
recidivism rates were equal or slightly lower than the institutional group. (Latessa & Smith, 2011)
The juvenile and the juvenile's parents must cooperate with the probation counselor and obey the
conditions of probation. (Davies & Davidson, 2001) Probation may be voluntary, in which the
juvenile agrees to comply with a period of informal probation instead of formal adjudication.
(Davies & Davidson, 2001) However, if the juvenile violates the terms set for probation, then he or
she imposes a harsher sentence such as incarceration at a detention
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

60. Juvenile Court Case Analysis
It is possible for some juveniles to be transferred out of the juvenile justice system and into the adult
or criminal court system but the process is multifaceted. Each state varies on the age in which a
juvenile can be waived to the adult court system. Juveniles that are transferred to the adult court
system have a number of reasons for this to happen. Generally they are transferred because it is
believed that it is not appropriate for the juvenile to be processed in juvenile court and that they will
be dealt with more to all intents and purposes in adult court. When a juvenile commits a violent
felony, they have placed themselves in the same category for which an adult receives their
punishment for the offense that they committed. There are ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
Once the prosecutor and/or juvenile judge has introduced the waiver petition, it does not
automatically occur, there has to be a waiver hearing and the prosecutor has to prove that the
juvenile defendant in fact committed the crime. In Tennessee, T.C.A. § 37–1–134, "the court must
find reasonable grounds to believe that (i) the child committed the delinquent act as alleged, (ii) the
child is not committable to an institution for the intellectually disabled or mentally ill, and (iii) the
interests of the community require that the child be put under legal restraint or discipline. Regarding
subdivision (b)(3) and § 37–1–134, it has been held by both the Tennessee Court of Appeals and
Court of Criminal Appeals that, although the burden of proof is on the prosecution on such issue,
there is a presumption of non–committability similar to that relating to sanity in criminal trials. Such
presumption can be rebutted by evidence introduced by the defendant, and in such event the burden
would shift back to the prosecution to persuade the court the child is not committable. See Howell v.
Hodge, 710 F.3d 381, 386 (6th Cir.
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

62. Juvenile Delinquency Court Cases
In these cases, we saw even though they are minors that if the courts wanted to hold juveniles
accountable for their crimes as they would adults then guidelines had to be set to ensure the
violation of juvenile liberties are not continued. We can see the cases that set the precedent for
changes in the juvenile justice system for example, the graph below:
Age:
Crime:
Violation:
Question before courts:
Kent v. United States (1966)
14 years old
Burglary
Due process rights violation
Jurisdiction of juveniles
In re Gault (1967)
15 years old
Lewd phone calls
Violation of the 14th Amendment
Juvenile Delinquency/Appointed counsel
In re Winship ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Alabama

63. (2012)
14 years old
Murder/Arson
8th Amendment
Whether life without parole is to harsh for juveniles
Table 1: Precedent Setting Cases.
This shows the overwhelming problem with the juveniles of all races if it was thought to not be a
serious issue obviously people are not properly educated in this. According to the following the
passage of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974:
"the primary responsibility for monitoring juvenile delinquency activities at the Federal level was
delegated to the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) within the U.S.
Department of Justice and OJJDP assumed responsibility for the reporting series. In 1975, the
National Center for Juvenile Justice (NCJJ) was awarded a grant by OJJDP to continue the Juvenile
Court.Statistics series. NCJJ agreed to continue the data collection and reporting procedures
established by the Children's Bureau" (Sickmund, M., & Puzzanchera, C., 2014).
12
13
14
15
16
17
10 to
Upper
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

65. The Purpose Of Juvenile Courts
According to Bartollas & Miller (2014), the purpose of the court is not for the punishment of
offenders but for the salvation of children ... whose salvation may become the duty of the state.
Juvenile courts have been put in place to protect juvenile delinquents from committing any further
crimes. It's a way to step in and help rehabilitate the offender when their family and the community
cannot. When a person commits a crime, whether or be juvenile or adult, they must be punished and
shown that behavior is not acceptable in society. It is known that juveniles are not as cognitively
developed as an adult would be so having separate courts (under certain circumstances) is a must.
Juvenile delinquents have a better chance of being reformed and
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

67. Juvenile Court Process Analysis
The first juvenile court to be established in the United States was set up in the state of Chicago back
in 1899 and has since then undergone a number of significant changes. This paper will seek to
provide an analysis of the juvenile court process, highlight the changes that have taken place in the
role of this court over the years in addition to also identifying why the role of the juvenile court has
changed. The organization and procedure of the juvenile court system is largely different from the
adult system and one of the differences between the two systems is that after having committed an
offence, juveniles are usually detained as opposed to their being arrested. The next step that is
involved in the juvenile court process is that a ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
When juvenile courts were first set up, they were primarily intended to be places where it would be
possible for children to receive individualized attention from concerned judges. Most of the court
hearings were largely informal and the judges were free to exercise their individual discretion as to
how each of the cases that was presented before them was to be handled. However, there was some
significant public concern in the 1950s and 1960s over the effectiveness of the country's juvenile
justice system. these concerns were mainly triggered from the disparities in treatment that resulted
from the absolute discretion that was exercised by the juvenile judges. To help in bringing
uniformity to the juvenile court process, a series of fundamental decisions were made by the
Supreme Court in the 1960s that helped to formalize juvenile courts in addition to also introducing
more due protections such as the right to counsel (Elrod & Ryder,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

69. Juvenile Court Vs. Adult
Nowadays, murders, rapists and other heinous crimes can be committed by anyone. A fourteen–
year–old teenager murders someone or does a massacre in school can be often seen from the
headline news of newspaper. However, these youth criminals may have much less severe
punishment than adults may have who have done the same crime. A criminal is a criminal that must
be punished as no difference between adult and youths; especially, the crimes are categorized under
murder and rape. A bullet wound just hurt as much when a child as fires the gun as when an adult
fires the gun. Therefore, regardless to age, the youths who commit heinous crimes like murder and
rape should be charged as adults in a way of the punishment they deserve the same. The difference
between juvenile court and adult court have been distinct. The issue has been a controversial one for
a long time. The two justice systems, juvenile court and adult court have been long established for
decades. Both involve people accused of crimes with the basic individual rights in the court.
According to Pacific Juvenile Defender Center, it stated, "Youth may be held under juvenile court
jurisdiction from age 12 until age 21, or until age 25 if he or she is committed to the California
division of juvenile justice." (YLC, 2009) The purpose of juvenile court system was set up for those
youths who are not as mature and cannot be held as adults. However, juvenile crimes are becoming
more often and heinous, it is necessary to focus
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

71. Recidivism In The Juvenile Court System
The juvenile court system in the state of Tennessee has transformed their approach to rehabilitate
juvenile offenders and reduce juvenile recidivism by establishing evidence–based treatment services
(Tennessee Department of Children's Services, 2017). Furthermore, these evidence–based treatment
services include a myriad of intervention treatments services from Functional Family Therapy, to
Aggression Replacement Training, and Teen Outreach Program plus numerous other programs (TN
DCS, 2017). Typically, the success of these programs is measured by recidivism rates, but in the
juvenile justice system recidivism is not all inclusive and different risk levels are applied to
particular offenders (TN DCS, 2017). Therefore, juvenile recidivism
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

73. Juvenile Court System Analysis
Juvenile justice was amended from its original format after its birth during the colonial period and
was restructured in the twentieth century when more due process rights were given to juveniles
(Siegel & Bartollas, 2014). Certain conditions and requirements must be met to allow a juvenile to
transfer into the adult court system as well as the type of crime committed by the juvenile can
contribute to the equation. According to Corrections Today, a judicial waiver is most commonly
used in court systems to transfer juveniles into the adult court system and begins as soon as the
juvenile begins the booking process (Siegel & Bartollas, 2014). Contrary to the amendment of
juvenile justice, the pre–colonial period thought of juveniles as legally incompetent and anyone over
the age of seven was capable of being punished as an adult (Silva, 2014). Different states have
different views and guidelines as to when a juvenile can be transferred into the adult court system as
well as contributing factors such ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
However, each state has different guidelines as to whom the authoritative power is given in deciding
the transferral of a juvenile into the adult court system. Furthermore, a statutorial exclusion may be
implemented among some states in the transferral of a juvenile into the adult court system based on
the offense of the crime and the age of the juvenile (Siegel & Bartollas, 2014). In spite of these types
of waivers, juveniles that have been transferred into the adult court systems and received their
sentences have resulted to be a negative impact on them. Therefore, juveniles have a tendency to
feel overwhelmed by older inmates and are more likely to be inspired to commit even more
dangerous crimes in the future as they are influenced by older inmates (Siegel & Bartollas,
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

75. Juvenile Court Case Analysis
In Tennessee there are multiple ways a Juvenile can be tried as an adult. If the court found reason to
believe that " the child committed the offense alleged, (2) the child is not committable to a mental
institution, and (3) the interests of the community require that the child be placed under legal
restraint" (Ojjdp, 2016). The law records different factors to be analyzed by the court in making
these discoveries. For the most part, the juvenile court's choice is not instantly appealable; be that as
it may, if a nonlawyer settles on the choice to exchange the case, a unique arrangement qualifies the
child for an instant de novo rehearing criminal court level (Ojjdp, 2016). A child who has been
transferred from a juvenile court by the choice of a non lawyer is qualified for ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
The murder charges should include torture, the offenders that deny attempting to murder someone,
just "teaching" them a lesson, is not acceptable. If the person receives that much pain, you should
too as well. Specially if it is a minor committing that crime, how bad is his mental state to even
think of a horrifying crime.In my opinion, the above crimes are the worst. I don't only believe they
should be tried as adults, but they should receive the death sentence. Those people took someone
else's life knowing what they were doing. That also applies to the rape and aggravated rape charges,
by raping a person, you took their life away. Rape has a great impact on the victim's physically and
mentally. It changes their whole life around and the people around them as well. They shouldn't be
any other crimes or occasions that juveniles should be prosecuted as adults. On the other hand, there
are crimes committed every day that I would have never thought of or thought someone would
committed them. Crimes change every day for the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

77. Juvenile Court Case Analysis
The juvenile justice system handles criminal cases for youth under the age of majority, which is 18
in most states. Most cases involving juveniles are tried in juvenile specific courts. There's some
exception, those exceptions along with everyone over legal age tried in standard criminal courts for
adults. One of the characteristics setting the juvenile system aside from the adult system, is that the
sentencing differences between adult and juvenile cases is significant.
In some states like New York, juveniles who are age 16 or 17 will automatically be tried in an
criminal court because the juvenile court jurisdiction ends at the age of 15. Most cases are
transferred to adult courts because the list of cases being tried growing. There ... Show more content
on Helpwriting.net ...
Exceptions exist for who are considered a juvenile. But a juvenile who committed a very serious
crime is tried in a adult court. In most of the cases the minors are found full mental capacity so they
are conscious of the actions and the consequences of the things that they made. In some states the
juveniles that made a serious crime and went to their first conviction as an adult, will be changed as
an adult.
The juvenile's court systems are more centered more in the rehabilitation of juveniles and offer more
sentencing options as compared to the adult criminal system. Some of these options keep the youth
out the jail and in the community service, diversion, and counseling programs. If the juvenile is
found to be delinquent, appropriate action in the form of rehabilitation will be taken. In the adult
criminal system, action is taken that is destined to punish the defendant.
Juvenile courts are more informal than the adult court, and may have more forgiving rules regarding
courtroom procedure. A possibility remains that children can be rehabilitated into becoming more
productive members of society once they have left through some sort of rehabilitation process.
There is always the exception to that rule when children just do not care and want to continue have a
bad life and commit crimes. Adults have already gotten set in their ways and the chances of
rehabilitating them are not as great as that of a
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

79. Issues In The Juvenile Court System
Juvenile court is typically for kids younger then 18 years old, depending on the state. Even though
the crime committed may have been criminal, because of their young age, they are charged with a
delinquent act and the proceedings are civil. The court will handle cases of minors who have
committed crimes, suffered abuse of neglect by their guardian, truancy, underage drinking, running
away, and curfew violations. At this time I would like to work at a court house. I did not see the one
listed I would most like to work for, but I do think the next rewarding one would be Juvenile court. I
think that everyone makes mistakes and how a juvenile is handled with issues in the court system
can help them to change their life if handled the
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...