Management-Control Systems, Transfer Pricing, and Multinational Considerationsl.ppt

DudyGaluh 39 views 30 slides Aug 12, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 30
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30

About This Presentation

Management-Control Systems,
Transfer Pricing,
and Multinational Considerations


Slide Content

Management-Control Systems,
Transfer Pricing,
and Multinational Considerations
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Management Control Systems
Management Control Systems are a means of
gathering and using information to aid and
coordinate the planning and control decisions
throughout an organization and to guide the
behavior of its managers and other employees
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Management Control Systems
Many management control systems contain
some or all of the balanced scorecard
perspectives:
1.Financial
2.Customer
3.Internal Business Process
4.Learning and Growth
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Management Control Systems
Consist of Formal and Informal control systems:
Formal systems include explicit rules, procedures,
performance measures, and incentive plans that
guide the behavior of its managers and other
employees
Informal systems include shared values, loyalties,
and mutual commitments among members of the
company, corporate culture, and unwritten norms
about acceptable behavior
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Evaluating
Management Control Systems
To be effective, management control systems
should be closely aligned to the firm’s strategies
and goals
Systems should be designed to fit the company’s
structure and decision-making responsibility of
individual managers
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Evaluating
Management Control Systems
Effective management control systems should
also motivate managers and their employees
Motivation is the desire to attain a selected goal
(goal-congruence) combined with the resulting
pursuit of that goal (effort)
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Two Aspects of Motivation
Goal Congruence exists when individuals and
groups work toward achieving the organization’s
goals – managers working in their own best
interest take actions that align with the overall
goals of top management
Effort is exertions toward reaching a goal,
including both physical and mental actions
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Organization Structure and Decentralization
Decentralization is the freedom for managers at
lower levels of the organization to make
decisions
Autonomy is the degree of freedom to make
decisions. The greater the freedom, the greater
the autonomy
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Decentralization vs. Centralization
Total decentralization means minimum
constraints and maximum freedom for managers
at the lowest levels of an organization to make
decisions
Total centralization means maximum constraints
and minimum freedom for managers at the
lowest levels of an organization to make decisions
Companies structures generally fall somewhere
in between these two extremes, as each has
benefits and costs. Structure chosen cost vs.
benefit analysis
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Benefits of Decentralization
Creates greater responsiveness to local needs
Leads to gains from faster decision making
Increases motivation of subunit managers
Assists management development and learning
Sharpens the focus of subunit managers
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Costs of Decentralization
Leads to Suboptimal Decision Making, which
arises when a decision’s benefit to one subunit is
more than offset by the costs or loss of benefits to
the organization as a whole.
Also called Incongruent Decision Making or
Dysfunctional Decision Making
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Costs of Decentralization
Focuses manger’s attention on the subunit rather
than the company as a whole
Increases costs of gathering information
Results in duplication of activities
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Decentralization and
Multinational Firms
Multinational firms – companies that operate in
multiple countries – are often decentralized
because centralized control of a company with
subunits around the world is often physically and
practically impossible
Decentralization enables managers in different
countries to make decisions that exploit their
knowledge of local business and political
conditions and to deal with uncertainties in their
individual environments
Biggest Drawback to International
Decentralization: Loss or lack of control
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Choices About
Responsibility Centers
Regardless of the degree of decentralization,
management control systems uses one or a mix
of the four types of responsibility centers:
Cost Center
Revenue Center
Profit Center
Investment Center
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Transfer Pricing
Transfer Price – the price one subunit
(department or division) charges for a product or
service supplied to another subunit of the same
organization
Management control systems use transfer prices
to coordinate the actions of subunits and to
evaluate their performance
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Transfer Pricing
The transfer price creates revenues for the
selling subunit and purchase costs for the buying
subunit affecting each subunit’s operating
income
Intermediate Product – the product or service
transferred between subunits of an organization
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Three Transfer Pricing Methods
1.Market-based Transfer Prices
2.Cost-based Transfer Prices
3.Negotiated Transfer Prices
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Market-Based Transfer Prices
Top management chooses to use the price of
similar product or service that is publicly
available. Sources of prices include trade
associations, competitors, etc.
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Market-Based Transfer Prices
Lead to optimal decision-making when three
conditions are satisfied:
1.The market for the intermediate product is
perfectly competitive
2.Interdependencies of subunits are minimal
3.There are no additional costs or benefits to the
company as a whole from buying or selling in
the external market instead of transacting
internally
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Market-Based Transfer Prices
A perfectly competitive market exists when there
is a homogeneous product with buying prices
equal to selling prices and no individual buyer or
seller can affect those prices by their own actions
Allows a firm to achieve goal congruence,
motivating management effort, subunit
performance evaluations, and subunit autonomy
Perhaps should not be used if the market is
currently in a state of “distress pricing”
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Cost-Based Transfer Prices
Top management chooses a transfer price
based on the costs of producing the
intermediate product. Examples include:
Variable Production Costs
Variable and Fixed Production Costs
Full Costs (including life-cycle costs)
One of the above, plus some markup
Useful when market prices are unavailable,
inappropriate, or too costly to obtain
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Cost-Based Transfer Pricing
Alternatives
Prorating the difference between the maximum
and minimum cost-based transfer prices
Dual-Pricing – using two separate transfer-
pricing methods to price each transfer from one
subunit to another. Example: selling division
receives full cost pricing, and the buying division
pays market pricing
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Negotiated Transfer Prices
Occasionally, subunits of a firm are free to
negotiate the transfer price between
themselves and then to decide whether to buy
and sell internally or deal with external parties
May or may not bear any resemblance to cost
or market data
Often used when market prices are volatile
Represent the outcome of a bargaining process
between the selling and buying subunits
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Comparison of Transfer-Pricing
Methods
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Transfer Pricing Illustration
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Transfer
Pricing
Illustration
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Minimum Transfer Price
The minimum transfer price in many situations
should be:
Incremental cost is the additional cost of
producing and transferring the product or service
Opportunity cost is the maximum contribution
margin forgone by the selling subunit if the
product or service is transferred internally
Minimum
Transfer Price=
Incremental cost per unit
incurred up to the point of
transfer +
Opportunity Cost per unit
to the selling subunit
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Multinational Transfer Pricing and Tax
Considerations
Transfer prices often have tax implications
Tax factors include income taxes, payroll taxes,
customs duties, tariffs, sales taxes, value-added
taxes, environment-related taxes and other
government levies
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

Multinational Transfer Pricing and Tax
Considerations
Section 482 of the US Internal Revenue Code
governs taxation of multinational transfer
pricing
Section 482 requires that transfer prices between
a company and its foreign division or subsidiary
equal the price that would be charged by an
unrelated third party in a comparable
transaction
Transfer price could be market-based or “cost-plus”
based
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.

© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights
reserved.
Tags