MANAGEMENT OF NERVE INJURIES AND COMPRESSIVE NEUROPATHIES OF(2) copy.pptx

sidramemon7 51 views 134 slides Oct 06, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 134
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91
Slide 92
92
Slide 93
93
Slide 94
94
Slide 95
95
Slide 96
96
Slide 97
97
Slide 98
98
Slide 99
99
Slide 100
100
Slide 101
101
Slide 102
102
Slide 103
103
Slide 104
104
Slide 105
105
Slide 106
106
Slide 107
107
Slide 108
108
Slide 109
109
Slide 110
110
Slide 111
111
Slide 112
112
Slide 113
113
Slide 114
114
Slide 115
115
Slide 116
116
Slide 117
117
Slide 118
118
Slide 119
119
Slide 120
120
Slide 121
121
Slide 122
122
Slide 123
123
Slide 124
124
Slide 125
125
Slide 126
126
Slide 127
127
Slide 128
128
Slide 129
129
Slide 130
130
Slide 131
131
Slide 132
132
Slide 133
133
Slide 134
134

About This Presentation

Reference: grabb & smith


Slide Content

MANAGEMENT OF NERVE INJURIES AND COMPRESSIVE NEUROPATHIES OF THE UPPER EXTREMITY Dr. Shahzad Shaikh , FCPS Plastic Surgery Dr. Sidra memon Plastic surgery resident

INTRODUCTION TO PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY Axon - A basic subunit Endoneurium – covers myelinated and unmyelinated axons Perineurium – covers collection of axons that is fascicles Internal Epineurium – Groups together fascicles External epinerium – outermost layer, encases individual fascicular groups

ETIOLOGY PENETRATING TRAUMA TRACTION COMPRESSION ELECTRICAL INJURY THERMAL INJURIES

RESPONSE TO INJURY

SEDDON CLASSIFICATION OF NERVE INJURIES

NEUROPRAXIA Continuity not disrupted – conduction block Anatomy is intact – function is deteriorated – due to demyelination. Prognosis – good. Full recovery – within 2 – 3 months.

AXONOTMESIS Loss of continuity of the axons Architectural integrity Wallerian Degeneration Prognosis – favourable Axonal re-growth – 1 mm/day

NEUROTMESIS Complete nerve transection Disruption of all layers Functional as well as physical disruption Scarring within the intervening gap. Neuroma formation. Surgical approximation of stumps for recovery

SUNDERLAND’S CLASSIFICATION OF NERVE INJURIES

ELECTRO-DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES Two Components Nerve Conduction Test – Measures signal transmission Electromyograhy – Measures spontaneous and induced electrical activity

NERVE CONDUCTION TEST ELECTROMYOGRAPHY NEUROPRAXIA CONDUCTION BLOCK DECREASED VOLUNTARY MOTOR UNIT ACTION POTENTIAL, NO FIBRILLATION/ DENERVATION CHANGES DEVELOP AXONAL INJURY (AXONOTMESIS & NEUROTMESIS) CONDUCTION BOTH ABOVE & BELOW THE INJURY IS DISRUPTED FIBRILLATION & DENERVATION CHANGES IN AFFECTED MUSCLES 3 TO 4 WEEKS FOLLOWING INJURY

MANAGEMENT Depends on mechanism of injury and type of nerve injury. 1) Penetrating trauma– neurotmesis - Early surgical exploration (72 hours) recommended. 2) Closed injury – uncertain nerve continuity - observation Electro diagnostic studies conducted at 1 to 2 weeks to differentiate neuropraxic/axonal injuries & complete/incomplete lesions. Followed by repeat studies at 4 weeks. Differentiation of axonotmesis & neurotmesis – monitoring signs of recovery – return of motor unit potential confirms axonotmesis.

FACTORS GOVERNING TIMING OF INTERVENTION NEUROPRAXIC LESIONS – recovery within 8 to 12 weeks AXONOTMESIS - recovery within 3 to 6 months – repair at a rate of 1 mm/day IRREVERSIBLE INJURY – beyond 12 to 18 months (muscle atrophy occurs at a rate of 1 % per week) Surgical exploration needed – no recovery evident by 3 to 6 months

COMPRESSIVE NEUROPATHIES OF THE MEDIAN NERVE

CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME ANATOMY - fibro-osseous canal bounded by bony arch of carpus and transverse carpal ligament. CONTENTS - Median nerve, tendons of FDS, FDP, FPL - Median nerve runs in superficial & radial position Distally divided into sensory braches to digits and recurrent motor branch to thenar muscles. Palmar cutaneous nerve - 5cm proximal to wrist crease – superficial to TCL

ETIOLOGIC FACTORS Advanced age Female gender Obesity Diabetes Pregnancy Hypothyroidism Rheumatologic & autoimmune diseases Alcoholism Renal failure Space occupying lesions (proliferative tenosynovitis, hematoma, ganglion cysts etc ) Displaced distal radial or carpal injuries Occupational

HISTORY Paresthesias in radial digits Aggravated by prolonged wrist flexion/extension Relieved by shaking hand Nocturnal symptoms are hallmark of CTS Severe cases - constant symptoms Frequent dropping of objects Loss of cordination in hand.

EXAMINATION Decreased light touch sensation Semmer weinstein monofilament testing (most sensitive than two point discrimination) Atrophy of muscles in advanced disease Specific examination tests: Tinel’s Test, Phalen’s Test & Durkan’s test

ELECTRO DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES IN CTS NERVE CONDUCTION STUDIES Hallmark - increased distal latency and decreased conduction velocity Distal motor latency >4.5 ms – Diagnostic Distal sensory latency >3.5 ms – Diagnostic Decreased amplitude of distal potential – indicate axonal loss. ELECTROMYOGRAPHY Increased insertional activity, fibrillation and denervation potentials.

MANAGEMENT Based on duration and severity of symptoms, etiology and patient preference. Mild Cases: Non-surgical options (night splinting, corticosteroid injection) – less likely to benefit patients with prolonged symptoms or advance disease

SURGICAL OPTIONS Surgical release of the TCL – most effective 2 methods: Open or endoscopic OPEN METHOD 2 –4 cm incision at base of palm Palmar fascia & TCL incised longitudinally. Release is carried distally upto superficial arch. Proximally upto deep antebrachial fascia ENDOSCOPIC RELEASE Minimal scarring Less pain. Short recovery time Rapid return to work

PRONATOR SYNDROME A compressive neuropathy of the median nerve at the level of the elbow

EPIDEMIOLOGY more common in women common in 5th decade has been associated with well-developed forearm muscles (e.g. weight lifters)

PATHOANATOMY 5 potential sites of entrapment include  1) supracondylar process  residual osseous structure on distal humerus present in 1% of population 2) ligament of Struthers  travels from tip of supracondylar process to medial epicondyle  not to be confused with arcade of Struthers which is a site of ulnar compression neuropathy in cubital tunnel syndrome 3) bicipital aponeurosis (a.k.a. lacertus fibrosus)  4) between ulnar and humeral heads of pronator teres  5) FDS aponeurotic arch   

SYMPTOMS paresthesias in thumb, index, middle finger and radial half of ring finger as seen in carpal tunnel syndrome in pronator syndrome paresthesias often made worse with repetitive pronosupination should have characteristics differentiating from carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)  aching pain over proximal volar forearm sensory disturbances over the distribution of palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (palm of hand) which arises 4 to 5 cm proximal to carpal tunnel   lack of night symptoms

PHYSICAL EXAM provocative tests are specific for different sites of entrapment positive Tinel sign in the proximal anterior forearm but no Tinel sign at wrist nor provocative symptoms with wrist flexion as would be seen in CTS resisted elbow flexion with forearm supination (compression at bicipital aponeurosis) resisted forearm pronation with elbow extended (compression at two heads of pronator teres) resisted contraction of FDS to middle finger (compression at FDS fibrous arch) possible coexisting medial epicondylitis

IMAGING Radiographs recommended views elbow films are mandatory  findings may see supracondylar process  STUDIES EMG and NCV may be helpful if positive but are usually inconclusive may exclude other sites of nerve compression or identify double-crush syndrome

NON-OPERATIVE rest, splinting, and NSAIDS for 3-6 months indications mild to moderate symptoms technique splint should avoid forearm rotation

OPERATIVE SURGICAL DECOMPRESSION OF MEDIAN NERVE   indications  only when non-operative management fails for 3-6 months technique decompression of the median nerve at all 5 possible sites of compression outcomes  of surgical decompression are variable 80% of patients having relief of symptoms

ANTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS NERVE SYNDROME A motor nerve Supplies FPL, FDP to the index &middle finger Pronator quadratus

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS Weakness of FPL – difficulty in pinch Pain in anterior cubital fossa “OK” sign – difficulty in flexing IP joint of thumb and DIP of index finger when asked to make OK sign Middle finger DIP weakness less severe than index finger Pronator quadratus weakness when elbow is in flexed position

TREATMENT Most patient improve with conservative management within 3 – 6 months. Surgery – for persistent symptoms – curvilinear incision antecubital fossa and release from all potential sites of compression

COMPRESSIVE NEUROPATHIES OF THE ULNAR NERVE Ulnar nerve is terminal branch of the medial cord of the brachial plexus. 2nd most common compression neuropathy of the upper extremity. They occur at elbow and at wrist

ANATOMY Ulnar nerve pierces intra-muscular septum at arcade of Struthers 8 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle as it passes from the anterior to posterior compartment of the arm to enter cubital tunnel. Ulnar nerve then passes between two heads of FCU and runs distally between FCU and FDP muscle bellies.

COMMON SITES OF ENTRAPMENT Arcade of Struthers (most proximal) Medial Inter-muscular Septum Medical Epicondyle Osborne’s Ligament Cubital Tunnel (most common) Deep flexor-pronator aponeurosis (most distal) Anconeus epitrochlearis (anomalous muscle from the medial olecranon to the medial epicondyle) Aponeurosis of FDS proximal edge

External sources of compression 1) Fractures and medial epicondyle non-unions 2) Osteophytes 3) Heterotopic ossification 4) Tumors and ganglion cysts Associated conditions 1) Cubitus varus or valgus deformities 2) Medial epicondylitis 3) Burns 4) Elbow contracture release

CUBITAL TUNNEL SYNDROME Cubital tunnel Roof formed by FCU fascia and Osborne's ligament (travels from the medial epicondyle to the olecranon) Floor formed by posterior and transverse bands of MCL and elbow joint capsule Walls formed by medial epicondyle and olecranon

PRESENTATION SYMPTOMS Intermittent numbness & paresthesias of small finger, ulnar half of ring finger, and ulnar dorsal hand  exacerbating activities include  cell phone use (excessive flexion) occupational or athletic activities requiring repetitive elbow flexion and valgus stress Direct pressure poster-medial elbow. Night symptoms caused by sleeping with arm in flexion

PHYSICAL EXAM Inspection and palpation Interosseous and first web space atrophy  Ring and small finger clawing Observe ulnar nerve subluxation over the medial epicondyle as the elbow moves through a flexion-extension arc  Weakness of extrinsic muscles - FDP of small fingers FCU weakness is seldom encountered. Sensory Decreased sensation in ulnar 1-1/2 digits Loss over dorso -ulnar hand

MOTOR Motor loss of the ulnar nerve results in paralysis of intrinsic muscles (adductor pollicis , deep head FPB, interossei, and lumbricals 4 and 5) which leads to; Weakened grasp from loss of MP joint flexion power Weak pinch from loss of thumb adduction (as much as 70% of pinch strength is lost) Loss of dexterity Froment sign   Jeanne sign  Wartenberg sign Masse sign Extrinsic weakness Pollock's test shows weakness of two ulnar FDPs

Elbow examination Tenderness, Deformity, Crepitus or loss of motion Instability of nerve – subluxation or frank dislocation

PROVOCATIVE TESTS Provocative tests Tinel sign positive over cubital tunnel Elbow flexion test positive when flexion of the elbow for > 60 seconds reproduces symptoms Combined elbow flexion – compression test.

STUDIES EMG / NCV Helpful in establishing diagnosis and prognosis Threshold for diagnosis conduction velocity <50 m/sec across elbow low amplitudes of sensory nerve action potentials and compound muscle action potentials Fibrillation, denervation potential and increased insertional activity

TREATMENT NON-OPERATIVE NSAIDs, activity modification, and nighttime elbow extension splinting (within 6 to 12 weeks) Indications Mild symptoms Without objective muscle weakness Technique Night bracing in 45° extension with forearm in neutral rotation Avoid provocative activities Rest the elbow on firm surfaces. Outcomes management is effective in ~50% of cases

SURGICAL OPTIONS   IN SITU ULNAR NERVE DECOMPRESSION WITHOUT TRANSPOSITION   ULNAR NERVE DECOMPRESSION AND ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION   MEDIAL EPICONDYLECTOMY

IN SITU ULNAR NERVE DECOMPRESSION WITHOUT TRANSPOSITION Indications Non-operative management fails Before motor denervation occurs Technique open release of osborne’s ligament endoscopically-assisted cubital tunnel release Limited dissection Preservation of surrounding vasculature. Outcomes meta-analyses have shown similar clinical results with significantly fewer complications compared to decompression with transposition RELATIVE CONTRAINDICATION Nerve instability Distorted tunnel anatomy

MEDIAL EPICONDYLECTOMY   Described as mini transposition Indications visible and symptomatic sub- luxating ulnar nerve Failure of medical treatment. Technique in situ release with medial epicondylectomy Outcomes risk of destabilizing the medial elbow by damaging the medial ulnar collateral ligament

ULNAR NERVE DECOMPRESSION AND ANTERIOR TRANSPOSITION  Addresses both direct compression and longitudinal traction  Indications Failed in situ release Throwing athlete Patient with poor ulnar nerve bed from tumor, osteophyte, or heterotopic bone Technique All potential sited of compression are released. Subcutaneous, sub-muscular, or intramuscular transposition relative to Flexor –pronator musculature. Advantage Results is decreased tension on nerve during elbow flexion Disadvantage extensive dissection and compromise of nerve’s blood supply

COMPLICATIONS Recurrence Secondary to inadequate decompression, perineural scarring, or tethering at the inter-muscular septum or FCU fascia higher rate of recurrence than after carpal tunnel release Neuroma formation Iatrogenic injury to a branch of the medial ante brachial cutaneous nerve may cause persistent posteromedial elbow pain

ULNAR TUNNEL SYNDROME ANATOMY Ulnar nerve and artery enters into ulnar tunnel ( guyon’s canal) BOUNDARIES Roof – volar carpal ligament Floor – TCL Medial border – Pisiform Lateral border – hook of hamate .

ZONES OF ULNAR TUNNEL ZONE I – proximal to bifurcation ZONE II – follows deep motor branch (at the level of fibrous arch oh hypothenar muscles & hook of hamate) ZONE III – follows suerficial sensory branch (courses along fascia of hypothenar muscles)

CAUSES DIRECT TRAUMA SPACE OCCUPYING LESIONS (GANGLION, ANOMALOUS MUSCLE BELLIES, BENIGN TUMORS) HYPOTHENAR HAMMER SYNDROME(REPETITIVE BLUNT TRAUMA) Direct nerve injury Hook of hamate fractures Thrombosis or pseudo-aneurysms of ulnar artery

PRESENTATION Depends on zone involved Zone I – both sensory and motor symptoms Zone II – motor symptoms (weak intrinsic muscles) Zone III – sensory (numbness and paresthesia of small and ring fingers, sparing the dorso ulnar hand)

EXAMINATION Hand examination similar to cubital tunnel syndrome Also asses tenderness over hook of hamate Abnormal allen’s test. Pulsatile mass over ulnar artery

INVESTIGATIONS ELECTRO-DIAGNOSTIC STUDIES Distinguish ulnar tunnel syndrome from proximal compression. IMAGING X-ray or CT scan – hook of hamate fracture MRI – soft tissue anomalies duplex ultrasound/angiography – thrombosis/pseudo-aneurysm

MANAGEMENT CONSERVATIVE Unidentifiable cause of compression Provocative activities avoided Wrist splints NSAID’s

SURGICAL INDICATION: Not responding to conservative management or space occupying lesion TECHNIQUE: Ulnar nerve and artery identified – proximal to wrist crease volar carpal – divided over neurovascular bundle to identify bifurcation of nerve motor branch – passes beneath proximal arcade of hypothenar muscles – arch is divided – floor around hook of hamate is examined Assesment for ulnar artery thrombosis / aneurysms – if present – ligation/graft reconstruction

COMPRESSIVE NEUROPATHIES OF RADIAL NERVE ANATOMY Terminal Branch – Brachial Plexus Medial to lateral – spiral groove of humerus Pierces lat : intramuscular septum – 10/12 cm proximal to lateral epicondyle Travels between brachialis and brachioradialis Elbow – anterior to radiocapitular joint Antecubital fossa – divides into PIN & Sup: radial sensory nerves

RSN – under brachioradialis muscle PIN – radial tunnel just distal to bifurcation – passes beneath fibrous edge of supinator -> post: compartment Multiple motor branches to extensor compartment as it exits radial tunnel

PIN COMPRESSION SYNDROME Radial tunnel – anatomic surroundings of PIN 5 potential sites of compression Fibrous bands – anterior to radiocapitular joint. Transversely crossing radial recurrent vessels (radial neck) Fibrous bands – ECRB Arcade of Frohse – leading edge of supinator (most common site – distal to leading edge of ECRB – formed by thickened aponeurotic band extending across proximal edge of superficial head of supinator) Distal fibrous edge of supinator

2 syndromes – due to PIN compression at radial tunnel Radial Tunnel Syndrome PIN Syndrome

RADIAL NERVE SYNDROME Repetitive activity – pain in proximal and lateral forearm No motor/sensory loss. D/D – tennis elbow

PROVOCATIVE TESTS Pain with restricted forearm supination Pain with restricted middle finger MP joint extension

DIAGNOSIS Mainly clinical Electrodiagnostic studies – unrevealing Short acting local anesthtic in radial tunnel – useful test (relief of symptoms with PIN palsy – confirmatory)

MANAGEMENT CONSERVATIVE Splinting, stretching and NSAIDS Limiting provocative activities 3 months intervention before surgical options

SURGICAL Decompression – volar or dorsal approach All potential sites to be relieved Volar approach – uses brachioradialis & FCR interval (good for assesing proximal sites of compression) Dorsal approach – ECRL & ECRB interval or ECRL & brachioradialis interval (better acces to PIN)

POSTERIOR INTEROSSEOUS SYNDROME Motor nerve – extensor musculature Motor weakness Painless No sensory involvement

INVESTIGATION Electrodiagnostic studies – fibrillations and denervation potential Imaging – U/S or MRI – space occupying lesion

MANAGEMENT CONSERVATIVE If space occupying lesion is not suspected Intermittent extension splinting of MP joints For 3 months

SURGICAL If no recovery upto 3 months Technique – similar to that of RTS

WARTENBERG SYNDROME Compression of superficial radial nerve RSN – leaves cover of brachioradialis 9 cm above radial styloid Passes between ECRL and brachioradialis – enter subcutaneous plane. Most vulnerable – sharp radial border of brachioradialis tendon

Inciting factor – trauma (direct blow, handcuffs wrist bands, scarring) Painful dysthesia at dorsum of hand radiating to thumb, index and middle finger. Tinel sign – localizes site of compression. No motor loss – sensory nerve Spontaneous resolution - common Prolonged course on conservative management

Corticosteroid injection may be tried External compressing factors to be removed Refractory cases – surgical decompression – dividing fibrous dorsal margin of brachioradialis tendon
Tags