MEMBRANE REACTOR_AMAL ABRAHAM_KA21128.pptx

amalabraham2670 18 views 14 slides May 30, 2024
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 14
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14

About This Presentation

MEMBRANE REACTOR_AMAL ABRAHAM_KA21128.pptx


Slide Content

INDIVIDUAL PROJECT NAME: AMAL ABRAHAM MATRIC ID: KA21128 TITLE: MEMBRANE REACTOR

INTRODUCTION: System where a chemical or biochemical conversion combined with a membrane operation. Two ways; - catalytically inert (membrane reactor) - Catalytic ( catalytic membrane reactor) Separation process allows to remove products from reaction thus enhancing yield (le chatelier’s principle)

LITERATURE REVIEW OVERVIEW: RESERVED FOR PROCESSES WHERIN THE MEMBRANE FUNCTIONS ARE MORE THAN SIMPLY A REACTIVE MEMBRANE. TYPES OF MEMBRANE: CAN BE CLASSIFIED INTO 1. HOMOGENEOUS/ HETEROGENEOUS. 2. ORGANIC (POLYMERIC) & INORGANIC (CERAMIC, METAL)

ORGANIC MEMBRANE COMMON USED FOR BIOCATALYTIC REACTORS PROCESSES MAINLY FOR: - FOOD & BEVERAGE - BIOTECHNOLOGICAL - BIOMEDICAL

INORGANIC MEMBRANE: INORGANIC MEMBRANE COMBINED IN A SINGLE – UNIT OPERATION. A POSSIBLE SCHEME OF AN INORGANIC MEMBRANE REACTOR COMPARISONS BETWEEN CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM & MEMBRANE REACTOR FOR WGS (WATER GAS SHIFT) REACTION.

APPLICATION OF INORGANIC MEMBRANE REACTORS MEMBRANE REACTORS ARE TESTED & STUDIED FOR DIFFERENT REACTION SYSTEMS. REACTIONS CONSIDERED FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION : WGS METHANE DECOMPOSITION STEAM REFORMING DEHYDROGENATION AMMONIA DECOMPOSITION

COMPARISON ORGANIC MEMBRANE SOLUTION DIFFUSION LOW PRODUCTION COST DISADVANTAGES : POOR THERMAL & CHEMICAL RESISTANCE INORGANIC MEMBRANE CARBON MEMBRANE & ZEOLITE MEMBRANE CARBON - KNUDSEN DIFFUSION - EXCELLENT CHEMICAL STABILITY ZEOLITE - MOLECULAR SIEVING - EXHIBIT CATALYTIC PROPERTY DISADVANTAGES : HIGH PRODUCTION COST & BRITTLE

CHAMBER DESIGNED FOR A BIOCHEMICAL TRANSFORMATION COMBINED WITH A MEMBRANE SEPARATION PROCESS. USED FOR DIFFERENT PURPOSES PROMINENT WASTEWATER TREATMENT METHODOLOGY OVER CAS (CONVENTIONAL ACTIVATED SLUDGE) MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR

DRAWBACKS: FOULING : MAJOR OBSTACLE Decreases the lifetime of membrane Degree of membrane fouling depends directly on the membrane characterization Takes place due to various physiochemical & biological processes

CURRENT RESEARCH DIRECTION: 37 / 800 mbr plants are operating at Europe. Annual growth rate of 17.4% Due to the increasing demand for wastewater treatment Mbr market driven by the increased scarcity of water, stricter rules for water discharge, reuse quality legislation.

SUMMARY Membrane reactors & bio-reactor have been introduced & discussed. Membrane reactor can be used to increase conversion. The core of the membrane reactor is the membrane (organic/ inorganic) Membrane reactor is a hybrid system amalgamating membrane separation with biological treatment.

REFERENCES 1. A. Basile, L. Paturzo , an experimental study of multilayered composite palladium membrane reactors for partial oxidation of methane to syngas, catal . Today, 67, 55-64 (2001a). 2. A. Basile, L. Paturzo , F. Lagana , the partial oxidation of methane to syngas in a palladium membrane reactor: simulation and experimental studies, catal . Today, 67, 65-75 (2001b). 3. Buonomenna , M.; Bae, J. Membrane processes and renewable energies. Renew. Sustain. Energy rev. 205, 43, 1343-1398. 4. C. Blocher, U. Bunse , B. Sebler , H. Chmiel and H.D. Janke, continuous regeneration of degreasing solutions from electroplating operations using a membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 162, 315-326 (2004). 5. Galluci , F.; Basile, A.; Hai, F.I. Introduction-a review of membrane reactors. In membranes for membrane reactors: preparation, optimization and selection; john wiley & sons: chichester , UK, 2011; pp.1-61. 6. Galluci , F.; Arash , H.; Latest development in membrane (bio) reactor; processes 2020, 8, 1239; doi : 10.3390/pr8101239. 7. H.E. Grethlein , anaerobic digestion and membrane separation of domestic wastewater. Journal of water pollution control federation, 50, 745-763 (1978). 8. H. Garcia, J.L. Rico and P. Garcia, comparison of anerobic treatment of leachates from an urban-solid-waste landfill at ambient temperature. Bioresource technol., 1996, 58, 273-277 (1996).

REFERENCES 9. Scholes, C.A.; Smith, K.H.; Kentish, S.; Stevens, G.W.CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes-strategies for membrane gas separation. Int.J.Greenh . Gas control. 2010, 4, 739-755. 10 Voldsund , M.; Jordal , K.; Anantharaman , R. Hydrogen production with CO2 capture. Int. J. Hydrogen energy 2016, 41, 4969-4992. 11 X. Tan, K. Li, oxidative coupling of methane in a perovskite hollow- fiber membrane reactor, ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 142-149 (2006). 12. Xiao, K.; Liang, S.; Wang, X.; Chen, C.; Huang, X. Current state and challenges of full-scale membrane bioreactor applications: A critical review. Bioresour . Technol. 2019, 271, 473-481. 13. Y.S. Lin, microporous and dense inorganic membranes: current status and prospective, sep. Purif . Tech., 25, 39-55 (2001). 14. Zhang, G.; Jin , W.; Xu, N. Design and fabrication of ceramic catalytic membrane reactors for green chemical engineering applications. Engineering 2018, 4, 848-860. 15. Zornoza , B.; Casado, C.; Navajas , A.; Casado- coterillo , C.Advances in hydrogen separation and purification with membrane technology; elsevier : amsterdam , the netherlands , 2013; ISBN 9780444563521.

THANK YOU
Tags