Production Theory
The Production Function
Total, Average, and Marginal Products
The Production Function in the Long Run
Size: 589.28 KB
Language: en
Added: Feb 08, 2011
Slides: 29 pages
Slide Content
Production Theory
KZ AXDAD
Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
University of Granada, Spain
Page 1 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
The Production Function
Production refers to the transformation of inputs into outputs
(or products)
+ An input is a resource that a firm uses in its production process
for the purpose of creating a good or service
+ A production function indicates the highest output (Q) that a
firm can produce for every specified combinations of inputs
(physical relationship between inputs and output), while holding
technology constant at some predetermined state
+ Mathematically, we represent a firm's production function as:
Assuming that the firm produces only one type of output with two inputs,
labor (L) and capital (K)
Page 2 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
The Production Function
DES]
+ The quantity of output is a function of, or depend on, the
quantity of labor and capital used in production
+ Output refers to the number of units of the commodity
produced
e Labor refers to the number of workers employed
+ Capital refers to the amount of the equipment used in
production
e We assume that all units of L and K are homogeneous or
identical
e Technology is assumed to remain constant during the period of
the analysis
Page 3 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
Production Theory
BY DABA
The Production Function in the
Short Run
Page 4 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
The Short Run
e The short run is a time period in which the quantity
of some inputs, called fixed factors, cannot be
increased. So, it does not correspond to a specific
number of months or years
e A fixed factor is usually an element of capital (such
as plant and equipment). Therefore, in our
production function capital is taken to be the fixed
factor and labor the variable one
Page 5 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
Total, Average and Marginal Products
e Total product (TP) is the total amount that is
produced during a given period of time
e Total product will change as more or less of the
variable factor is used in conjunction with the given
amount of the fixed factor
e Average product (AP) is the total product divided by
the number of units of the variable factor used to
produce it
e Marginal product (MP) is the change in total product
resulting from the use of one additional unit of the
variable factor
Page 6 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
Output with Fixed Capital and Variable
Labor
Quantity of labor (L)
Total product (TP)
Marginal product (MP)
Average product (AP)
0
0
50
50
50.00
60
55.00
130.00
130
130.00
60
116.00
50
105.00
20
92.86
0
81.25
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
-10
71,11
Page 7
Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Total Product, Average Product and
Marginal Product Curves
Relationships among Total, Marginal an
Average Products of Labor
jC
TP E H + With labor time continuously
product divisible, we can smooth TP, MP,
and AP, curves
+ The TP curve increases at an
increasing rate up to point A;
past this point, the TP curve
rises at a decreasing rate up to
Labor Point C (and declines thereafter)
APL
+ The MP, rises up to point A,
MP,
becomes zero at C, and is
negative thereafter
Marginal product,
+ The AP, raises up to point B
and declines thereafter (but
remains positive as long TP is
Labor positive)
Average product
Page 9 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Law of Diminishing
TP By
Returns
Total
product
Labor
APL
MPL
Marginal “bal
>
Average product, !
Labor
La
C
Lo LA
+ This law states that as
additional units of an input are
used in a production process,
while holding all other inputs
constant, the resulting
increments to output (or total
product) begin to diminish
beyond some point (after A, in
the bottom graph)
+ As the firm uses more and more
units of the variable input with the
same amount of the fixed input,
each additional unit of the variable
input has less and less of the fixed
input to work and, after this point,
the marginal product of the variable
input declines
Page 10
Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
Stages of Producti
on
APL
MPL
[ei
! Total
! product
f Labor
A
Margin onan
Averagf cet
Labor
The relationship between the MP,
and AP, curves can be used to
define three stages of production
of labor (the variable input)
Stage I of labor
Is the range of production for which
increases in the use of a variable input
cause increases in its average product
EZ] Stage II of labor
Is the range for which increases in the
use of a variable input causes decreases
in its average product, while values of its
associated marginal product remain
nonnegative
EEE Stage III of labor
Is the range for which the use of a
variable input corresponds to negative
values for its marginal product
Page 11
Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco |
In Terms of Calculus ...
+ Marginal product of labor = change in output/change in labor
input =AQ/AL
e If we assume that inputs and outputs are continuously or
infinitesimally divisible (rather than being measured in discrete
units), then the marginal product of labor would be:
m =f
Example. Let's consider the following production function:
Q=8K!?L!? Cobb-Douglas production function
TP, =8 L*
MP, =8K?4L> IK=1>
MP, =4L*
Page 12 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
The Production or Output Elasticity of Labor
The elasticity of output with respect to the labor
input measures the percentage change in output for a 1
percent change in the labor input, holding the capital
input constant
Page 13 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Production Theory
BY DABA
The Production Function in the
Long Run
Page 14 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
The Long Run
+ The long run is a time period in which all inputs may be varied
but in which the basic technology of production cannot be
changed
+ The long run corresponds to a situation that the firm faces
when is planning to go into business (to expand the scale of its
operations)
e Like the short run, the long run does not correspond to a
specific length of time
+ We can express the production function in the form:
Page 15 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
Production Isoquants
Units per time period
This curve indicates that a firm can produce the
specified level of output from input combinations
(Lu Ky), (Lor Ko), (Lar Ks), ---
As we move down from one point on an
isoquant to another, we are substituting
one factor for another while holding
output constant
Q=f(LK)
Units per time period
Page 16
Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Marginal Rate of Technical Substitution
+ The marginal rate of technical substitution (MRTS)
measures the rate at which one factor is substituted for
another with output being held constant
e Since we measure K on the vertical axis, the MRTS
represents the amount of capital that must be
Kyp---\a sacrificed in order to use more labor in the production
process, while producing the same level of output:
AK/AL (the slope of the isoquant which is negative)
+ We multiply the ratio by -1 in
order to express the MRTS as a
positive number
Q =f (L,K)
.
Units per time period
Units per time period
Page 17 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
MRTS When Labor and Capital Are
Continuously Divisible
Let's take the total differential of the production function:
00 2Q
dQ= —dL+—dkK
2 OL OK
Setting this total differential equal zero (since output does not change along a
given isoquant):
In production theory, the marginal rate of technical substitution is equal to the
ratio of marginal products (in consumer theory, the marginal rate of substitution is
equal to the ratio of marginal utilities)
If we specify the level of output as Q = 9 units, and the firm uses 3 units of labor, then
the amount of capital used is:
9=3K'3) > 3-ŸK > K=3units
=2 This result indicates that the firm can substitute 2 units of capital for 1
MRTS = 26)
3 unit of labor and still produce 9 units of output
Page 19 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco |
Production Theory
a AID
Econometric Analysis of
Production Theory
Page 20 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
The Cobb-Douglas Production Function
+ Q= output
+ L = labor input
+ K = labor capital
e u = stochastic disturbance term
+ e= base of natural logarithm
+ The parameter A measures, roughly speaking, the scale of
production: how much output we would get if we used one unit
of each input
+ The parameters beta measure how the amount of output
responds to changes in the inputs
Page 21 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco |
The Cobb-Douglas Production Function
Q= A LA K* e"
e Our problem is to obtain an estimated function:
= A LÀ Kr
+ However, if we take logarithms in both sides, we have:
InQ =ÍnA)* A InL + B, InK +u
Bo
This is the log-log, double-log or log-linear model
Page 22 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
The Properties of the Cobb-Douglas
Production Function
InQ = B, + BinL+ B, InK +u
Fitting this equation by the method of least squares, we have:
+
The estimated coefficient £, is the elasticity of output with
respect to the labor input; that is, it measures the percentage
change in output for a 1 percent change in the labor input,
holding the capital input constant
Likewise, the estimated coefficient Z, is the elasticity of output
with respect to the capital input, holding the labor input
constant
Page 23 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco |
The Properties of the Cobb-Douglas
Production Function
InQ = B, + 4, InL + B, InK +u
3. The sum of the estimated coefficients £, and £
gives information about the returns to scale
e If this sum is 1, then there are constant returns to
scale; that is, doubling the inputs will double the output,
tripling the inputs will triple the output, and so on
+ If the sum is less than 1, there are decreasing returns to
scale; e.g. doubling the inputs will less than double the
output
e If the sum is greater than 1, there are increasing returns
to scale; e.g. doubling the inputs will more than double
the output
Page 24 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco ]
Cobb-Douglas Production Function: The
Agricultural Sector in Taiwan (1958-1972)
+ The log-linear model:
In¥, =f, +B, InX,,+ B, Xy, +4,
e Regression by the OLS method: d = 0.891
In¥, =-3.338 41.499 x +0490m X,
output elasticity output elasticity
of labor of capital
1.989
** Significant at 5%-level increasing returns to scale
Page 25 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Cobb-Douglas Production Function: The
Agricultural Sector in Taiwan (1958-1972)
Evidence of No autocorrelation Evidence of
positive negative
| autocorrelation | | autocorrelation |
Indecision Indecision
0 d dy 2 4-dy 4-d 4
d = 0.891 d = 1.939
0.946 1.543 2.457 3.054
0.814 1.750 2.250 3.186
Regression including a time variable: d = 1.939
In} =9.348 + 0.878 In X,, — 0.469 In X,, + 0.064 TIME
OK
kk * *
** Significant at 5%-level
* Significant at 10%-level
Page 26 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Cobb-Douglas Production Function: The
U.S. Bell Companies (1981-82)
+ The log-linear model:
InY, =f, + fP, MK, + £, nM, + $, nL, + error
e Regression by the OLS method: d = 1.954 (no autocorrelation)
InY, =1.461+0.401Ink, + 0.373 Ina (0203)n L,
** Ak **
output elasticity
of labor
A 1 percent increase in the labor input
led on the average to about a 0.2
percent increase in the output
** Significant at 5%-level
Page 27 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco
Problems in Regression Analysis
e Regression analysis may face two main econometric problems
when we use cross-sectional data (data on economic units for a
given year or other time period):
— Multicollinearity
— Heteroscedasticity
+ This arises when the assumption that the variance of the error term is
constant for all values of the independent variables is violated
+ This situation leads to biased standard errors
+ When the pattern of errors or residuals points to the existence of
heteroscedasticity, the researcher may overcome the problem by using
logs or by running a weighted least squares regression
+ Nowadays, several computer packages (STATA, LIMDEP, ...) present
robust standard errors (using White’s procedure)
Page 28 Dr. Manuel Salas-Velasco |
Detection of Heteroscedasticity: The
Breusch-Pagan Test
e Step 1. Estimate the model using OLS and obtain the residuals, à;
+ Step 2. Obtain the maximum likelihood estimator of 0?: >û?/n
e Step 3. Construct the variable p;: divide the squared residuals obtained
from regression (ú2) by the number obtained in step 2
+ Step 4. Regress p, on the X's and obtain ESS (explained sum of
squares)
e Step 5. Obtain the B-P statistic (ESS/2) and compare it with the critical
chi-square value
B-P B-P
There is not heteroscedasticity There is heteroscedasticity