Micromirror display technology

7778888111 1,096 views 10 slides Sep 02, 2017
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 10
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10

About This Presentation

The Micromirror Display Technology - Basic Details


Slide Content

Presented by- Manash Pratim Bezbaruah Bulbul Brahma Gouri Shankar Chetia MICRO MIRROR DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY

CONTENTS INTRODUCTION OPERATION PERFORMANCE HISTORY PERFORMANCE COMPARISION APPLICATIONS SUMMARY REFERENCES

INTRODUCTION It is a combination of both Opto Mechanical and Electro mechanical Elements. Also known as MOEMS (Micro- Opto -Electromechanical System) . The DMD was first developed by Solid state physicist Dr. Larry Hornbeck in the year 1987 .

It consists of array of hundreds to millions of tiny micromirrors . ( 10 microns in size = one tenth size of human hair ). Each micromirror consists of CMOS memory cell . The micromirror is a digital two-state device (operated at either + 12 ° or - 12 ° ). - “1” state for + 12 ° . - “0” state for - 12 ° . The mirrors can be individually rotated ±10-12°, to an on or off state .

OPERATION   “1” or “0” will be loaded into the memory cell for each micromirror . A micromirror clocking pulses is then applied, the mirror will update + 12 or -12 degree . In a typical setup , - a light source (e.g. LED, LASER, Lamp etc.) will illuminate the DMD with an angle of 24 ° . - Each pixel then directs a light to one of the two output ports.

PERFORMANCE HISTORY Several years ago mirror pitch was reduced from 17um to 13.7um , allowing smaller device footprints and associated cost. The most recent advances have been to , 1) increase mirror tilt from +/- 10 degrees to +/-12 degrees, enabling increased optical efficiency, 2) increase projector contrast ratio to >1000:1 by using dark (non-reflecting) metal layers below each mirror,

PERFORMANCE COMPARISION For many potential applications DMD has no current rival LCD panels used in display applications have orders of magnitude slower pixel response than DMD and are operated in analog mode. LCD technology is very wavelength dependent and is not considered robust under UV illumination. Ferroelectric LCD ( FLCD) technology is much less mature and difficult to fabricate, but provides binary switching below 100us. While this is still several times slower than DMD.

Digital ligt processing Digital fidelity 3d display Scientific tools Volumetric displays Lithograpgy applications Broadband operations High intensity and laser operations Holography and data storage APPLICATIONS

SUMMARY DLP technology is now firmly established in a variety of projection display products, enabling brilliant images through digital light switch solutions . Many new DMD applications beyond projection display are emerging, and are being enabled through general use DMD products that are now available to developers. These DMD-based innovations will result in a portfolio of exciting new products with the potential to disrupt multiple industries.

REFERENCE 1. D. Doherty, G. Hewlett, “Phased Reset Timing for Improved Digital Micromirror Device ( DMD) Brightness ,” SID Symposium Digest, Vol. 29, (1998), p. 125 . 2. M.R. Douglass, “Lifetime Estimates and Unique Failure Mechanisms of the Digital Micromirror Device ,” IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium, 36th Annual, pp. 9-16, April 1998. 3 . L. Yoder, W. Duncan, E.M. Koontz, J. So, T. Bartlett, B. Lee, B. Sawyers, D.A. Powell, P. Rancuret , “ DLPTM Technology: Applications in Optical Networking,” Proc. SPIE, Vol. 4457 (2001), pp. 54-61 . 4. R.S. Nesbitt, S.L. Smith, R.A. Molnar, S.A. Benton, “Holographic recording using a Digital Micromirror Device,” Proc. SPIE, Vol. 3637 (1999 ). 5. M. Liang, R.L. Stehr , A.W. Krause, Confocal pattern period in multiple-aperture confocal imaging systems with coherent illumination, Opt. Lett . 22, pp. 751-753, 1997 . 6 . R.A. DeVerse , R.M. Hammaker , W.G. Fateley , “Realization of the Hadamard Multiplex Advantage Using a Programmable Optical Mask in a Dispersive Flat-Field Near-Infrared Spectrometer,” Applied Spectroscopy , Vol. 54, No. 12, (2000), pp. 1751-8.
Tags