Minimal Change Disease

avalliant 12,375 views 39 slides Jan 18, 2013
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 39
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39

About This Presentation

No description available for this slideshow.


Slide Content

Fellows’ Curriculum
Amanda Valliant, MD
Nephrology Fellow
10.17.2012
Minimal Change Disease

Objectives
Epidemiology
Pathology
Pathogenesis
Etiology/Associations
Diagnosis
Treatment

Epidemiology
First described in 1913 by Munk, who called it lipoid
nephrosis due to lipids in tubular epithelial cells and urine
More common in children
70-90% of nephrotic syndromes in kids <10
50% of nephrotic syndromes in kids 10-18
10-15% of primary nephrotic syndromes in adults; 3
rd
most
common after FSGS and MN
More common in Asia than in North America/Europe
? Biopsy practices? vs genetic or environmental influence

Biopsy-Proven Proteinuria Causes (>3g/day)
FIGURE 31-1 Graph depicting the frequencies of different forms of glomerular disease identified in renal
biopsy specimens from patients with proteinuria of more than 3 g of protein per day evaluated at the
University of North Carolina Nephropathology Laboratory. Some diseases that cause proteinuria are
underrepresented because they are not always evaluated by renal biopsy. For example, in many patients steroid-
responsive proteinuria is given a presumptive diagnosis of minimal change glomerulopathy and patients do not
undergo biopsy, and most patients with diabetes and proteinuria are presumed to have diabetic
glomerulosclerosis and do not undergo biopsy.

Pathology: Light Microscopy
FIGURE 31-2 Unremarkable light microscopic appearance of a biopsy specimen from a patient with
minimal change glomerulopathy. Glomerular basement membranes are thin, and there is no glomerular
hypercellularity or mesangial matrix expansion. (Jones’ methenamine silver stain, ×300.)
Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 9
th
Ed. CH. 31—Primary Glomerular Disease

Pathology: Foot Process Effacement
FIGURE 31-3 Diagrams depicting the ultrastructural features of a normal glomerular capillary loop
(A) and a capillary loop with features of minimal change glomerulopathy (B). The latter has effacement
of epithelial foot processes (arrow) and microvillous projections of epithelial cytoplasm.
Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 9
th
Ed. CH. 31—Primary Glomerular Disease

Pathology: Electron Microscopy
FIGURE 31-4 Electron micrograph of a glomerular capillary wall from a patient with minimal
change glomerulopathy showing extensive foot process effacement (arrows) and microvillous
transformation. (×5000.)
Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 9
th
Ed. CH. 31—Primary Glomerular Disease

Pathogenesis—T Cell Dysfunction?
Likely the result of abnormal regulation of a T-cell subset and
pathologic elaboration of one or more circulating “permeability
factors”
Circulating factor thought to directly effect the glomerular
capillary wall  foot process effacement and fusion
Steroids and alkylating drugs (cyclophosphamide) most effective for
remission
Association with Hodgkins; occurs more frequently than in general pop
Remission tends to occur during viral illnesses like measles known to modify
cell-mediated immunity
Transplanting a kidney from a patient with refractory minimal change
disease  rapid disappearance of proteinuria

Pathogenesis—B Cells?
Initially thought to be uninvolved or negligible
Recent publications demonstrating response to rituximab
(B20 monoclonal antibody) suggest B cell involvement in
producing permeability factors in circulation

Pathogenesis—Does this “permeability
factor” exist?
T-cell hybridoma from MCD patient  proteinuria and foot
process effacement in rats
Isolated rat glomeruli + sera from Hodgkins patient with
MCD  increased permeability to albumin, improved when
Hodgkins treated but NOT with steroids
2 MCD kidneys transplanted into 2 recipients (oops) 
proteinuria at time of grafting decreased to normal in 6
weeks

Pathogenesis—What IS this factor?
Hemopexin
Plasma protein with an active isoform that may cause increased
glomerular permeability
Patients with relapsed disease demonstrate increased levels of
hemopexin proteinase activity
Th2-derived cytokine IL-13
Rats with IL-13 overexpression  albuminuria,
hypoalbuminemia, up to 80% foot process fusion on biopsy
Patients with relapsed MCD have increased expression
IL-13 induces CD80 expression in rat podocytes  foot
process fusion and proteinuria

Overexpression of Interleukin-13 Induces
Minimal-Change–
Like Nephropathy in Rats
Background
MCD may be a T cell dependent

disorder that results in glomerular
podocyte dysfunction
Th2 cytokine bias in patients with MCD
MCD associated with atopy and allergy
Relapse MCD with elevated IL-4 and IL-13
Association between MCD and Hodgkins’s disease
IL-13 known to be an autocrine growth factor

for the Reed-Sternberg
JASN 18 : 1476-1485,2007

Hypothesis
IL-13 may play an important role in the development of

proteinuria in MCNS by exerting a direct effect on podocytes,

acting through the IL-13 receptors on the podocyte cell surface,

initiating certain signaling pathways that eventually lead to

changes
in the expression of podocyte-related proteins (nephrin, podocin,
and dystroglycan)
IL-13 transfected rat was used as a model in this study

Mean 24-h urine albumin excretion
(mg/24 h)
Controls n=17
IL 13 n =41

Comparison of control, IL-13-transfected mouse
at experiment end (day 70)
ParameterParameter Control Rats Control Rats
(n=17)(n=17)
Group 1 Group 1
(proteinuric rats), (proteinuric rats),
n=34n=34
Grp 2: neprhrotic Grp 2: neprhrotic
rats n=7rats n=7
Serum albuminSerum albumin42.7 +/- 1.842.7 +/- 1.840.7 +/- 1.340.7 +/- 1.325.5 +/- 2.225.5 +/- 2.2
Urine albuminUrine albumin0.36 +/- 0.040.36 +/- 0.043.19 +/- 0.983.19 +/- 0.989.69 +/- 4.079.69 +/- 4.07
Serum cholesterolSerum cholesterol1.72 +/- 0.051.72 +/- 0.052.68 +/- 0.182.68 +/- 0.186.88 +/- 1.096.88 +/- 1.09
Serum IL-13Serum IL-13 7.1 +/- 1.87.1 +/- 1.8 241.4 +/- 69.5241.4 +/- 69.5708.6 +/- 257.7708.6 +/- 257.7
NephrinNephrin 0.16 +/- 0.030.16 +/- 0.030.11 +/- 0.010.11 +/- 0.010.01 +/- 0.0050.01 +/- 0.005
PodocinPodocin 0.25+/- 0.050.25+/- 0.05 0.17 +/- 0.020.17 +/- 0.020.01 +/- 0.0050.01 +/- 0.005
Yellow = p <0.001 vs controlRed = p<0.001 vs control and Grp 1

Histopathologic features on day 70
at killing
(A) Glomerulus of IL-13–transfected rat
showing no significant histologic changes
(periodic acid-Schiff stain).
(B) Glomerulus of IL-13–transfected rat
showing fusion of podocyte foot processes
(arrows).
(C) Glomerulus of control rat showing
normal individual podocyte foot processes
along the glomerular basement membrane
(GBM; arrows).

Immunofluorescence staining of
glomeruli for protein expression
of nephrin, podocin, dystroglycan,
and synaptopodin
nephrin
podocin
dystroglycan
synaptopodin
Control IL-13 infected

Summary
IL-13-transfected rats
Developed minimal change like GN, as evidence by LM and EM changes
Decrease in the expression of nephrin, podocin,

and dystroglycan
associated with increased urinary albumin excretion and podocyte

foot
process effacement
suggesting that these proteins are

essential in maintaining the filtration barrier, thus
controlling

glomerular permeability
decrease was not due to loss of

podocytes (glomerular expression of WT-1 and
synaptopodin showed no difference between control and IL-13 transfected rats)

Pathogenesis—How does the GBM
factor in?
3 structures separate the capillary lumen from Bowman’s space
Fenestrated endothelium
Glomerular Basement Membrane (GBM)
Epithelium with a slit diaphragm between podocyte foot processes
Endothelium and GBM are strongly anionic—negative charges from
sialic acid and heparin sulfate
Normally (-) charge repulses circulating albumin
Theory is that the circulating permeability factor diminishes the anionic
property of the GBM
Slit diaphragm plays a critical role with visible defects on EM in MCD
patients but pathophysiology not understood

Pathophysiology of MCD
UNC
UNC Medical Center

Etiology--Drugs
 NSAIDs and selective COX-2 Inhibitors
Antimicrobials (ampicillin, rifampicin, cephalosporins)
Lithium
D-penicillamine, sulfasalazine (any 5-ASA derivative)
Pamidronate (and presumably other bisphosphonates)
Gamma interferon
Immunizations

Etiology—Neoplastic Associations
Hodgkin Lymphoma (0.4%)
Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Leukemia
Cases of MCD associated with solid tumors are rare but have
been reported
MCD diagnosis may precede signs and symptoms of the
malignancy
Proteinuria typically resolves with treatment of the
malignancy

Etiology—Infectious Associations
Rare associations with syphyllis, tuberculosis, mycoplasma,
ehrlichiosis, Hep C, echinococcus
MCD has been described in HIV infection but collapsing
FSGS much more commonly seen

Etiology—Allergy Associations
History of allergy described in up to 30% of cases
Multiple allergens described (fungi, cat fur, poison ivy,
pollen, bee stings, house dust)
Onset and relapses have been triggered by bee stings and
allergic reactions
Limited evidence for involvement of food allergy but one
small dietary study suggested an association (oligoantigenic
diet???)

Etiology—Other Glomerular Diseases
Association with IgA Nephropathy, with mesangial IgA
deposits and mild mesangial proliferation seen in
concurrence with MCD on biopsy
Reports of MCD occurring with the following, but rare:
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Type 1 Diabetes
Polycystic Kidney Diseases

MCD Presentation
Typically sudden onset, over days to a week or two
Weight gain, edema, “frothy” urine
Proteinuria >3 g daily and sometimes 15-20 g/day
Hypoalbuminemia, often <2 g/dL
Most cases also demonstrate hyperlipidemia
Microscopic hematuria fairly common in adults, found in 20-
25% of children
AKI not an infrequent complication in adults, creatinine
elevation typically 30-40% > baseline
40-50% will have hypertension at the time of diagnosis

MCD Diagnosis
Renal biopsy needed prior to treatment in adults; children
can be treated presumptively with steroids
Need to demonstrate ALL of the following on biopsy:
Normal glomerular findings on light microscopy
Absence of complement or Ig deposits on immunflourescence
Characteristic diffuse effacement of epithelial foot processes on
EM

MCD vs FSGS
Primary FSGS diagnosis requires biopsy findings of segmental
glomerusclerosis in at least 1 glomerulus in addition to
diffuse foot process effacement
Sclerotic changes appear first at the juxtamedullary
glomeruli, which may not be seen in a biopsy sample
containing only outer cortex or with <8 glomeruli on biopsy
Some cases that respond poorly to steroids and progress to
ESRD are thought to have been missed FSGS rather than
MCD at initial diagnosis

Odds & Ends
Diagnosis in the elderly may be challenging as changes of aging
may suggest primary FSGS rather than MCD superimposed on
aging glomerulosclerosis of aging should be focal and global
rather than focal and segmental
Nephrotic syndrome + AKI  also should consider collapsing
FSGS (idiopathic or HIV), crescentic GN superimposed on
membranous nephropathy, nephrotic syndrome due to
monoclonal Ig deposition (cast nephropathy)
Renal vein thrombosis may occur as a complication of MCD but is
typically CHRONIC in nature and does not cause renal failure due
to collateral circulation

MCD Treatment
Glucocorticoid therapy is treatment of choice initially
Prednisone 1 mg/kg daily (max 80 mg daily)
Complete response and remission defined as reduction of
proteinuria to 300 mg/day
Relapse defined as return to 3.5g/day or more after previous
remission
Frequent relapsers defined as 3 or more relapses per year
Remission occurs in 85-90% with steroids but may take several
months to remit in adults (25% take longer than 3-4 months)
Response to initial steroid therapy most important prognostic
indicator

MCD Treatment
Glucocorticoid dependance considered relapse on therapy or patients who must
stay on steroids to maintain remission
Glucocorticoid resistane refers to little to no reduction in proteinuria after 16
weeks of adequate prednisone tehrapy
Remissions as well as relapses usually abrupt, occurring within 1-2 weeks 
“all or nothing” response
Partial response = ? Diagnosis ?
Relapses may be triggered by infection or allergy
Most relapses occur within one year of stopping therapy but have been known
to occur up to 25 years later

MCD Treatment
Diuretics + salt-free diet also important in treatment due to
severe edema + hypertension typically present
If patient remains hypertensive, ARB or ACEI should be
considered for further treatment
Steroid taper should not be started for minimum of 8 weeks
or 1-2 weeks after complete remission
Very slow taper recommended to prevent relapse

Treatment—Glucocorticoids
There is only one randomized control treatment trial in
adults with MCD that compared prednisone with no
therapy (n=31).
-75 % of prednisone treated patients had remission to
<1g/day of proteinuria within 6 months.
-In the untreated group, 50% were in remission at 18
months and approximately 70% at three years.
There are no randomized control trials comparing
prednisone to other agents for the initial therapy in adults
with MCD.
Black DA et al. BMJ 3:p421, 1970.

Second Line Therapy
Reasonable to repeat steroid course in patients who relapse off
of steroids
Relapsing while on steroids or frequent relapsers may need
additional treatment
Alkylating agents such as cyclophosphamide can be used but must
be monitored closely
Antimetabolites (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil) are often
helpful
CNIs such as cyclosporine or tacrolimus effective but may cause
renal injury
Direct antiproteinuric effect on the podocyte
Continuous low-dose prednisone often considered but must
discuss long-term side effects

Second Line Therapy
Cyclosporine tends to achieve a more rapid remission, but
between 60-90% of patients relapse after discontinuation making
cyclosporine dependence a major issue.
Both cyclophosphamide and cyclosporine reported to induce and
maintain remission in up to 60% of MCD patients, less so in
steroid resistant cases (10%).
No prospective trials on second-line treatment; all have been
retrospective observational reports.

Sources
www.uptodate.com
“Etiology, clinical features, and diagnosis of minimal change
disease in adults”
“Treatment of minimal change disease in adults”
Greenburg, A. Primer on Kidney Diseases,5
th
Edition.
NKF, 2009. Chapter 17, Minimal Change Nephrotic
Syndrome, pp. 160-164.
Brenner and Rector’s The Kidney, 9
th
Edition. CH. 31,
Primary Glomerular Diseases.
www.slideshare.com

Thank You!
Questions?
Tags