Minimally invasive dentistry

10,671 views 66 slides Nov 21, 2019
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 66
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66

About This Presentation

Recent concepts included


Slide Content

MINImALLY INVASIVE DENTISTRY Dr. Sucheta Prabhu Second Year MDS 9/11/17 1

Questions asked previously 100 marker Minimally invasive dentistry Use of lasers in pediatric practice Explain in detail on traditional cavity preparation in primary teeth with a short note on MID Recent advances on chemomechanical caries prevention Changing concept in cavity preparation 2

Questions asked previously Short essay MID ART Changing concept in cavity preparation in class 2 cavity design 3

Contents Introduction Definition Principles Recent Cavity classification Tunnel,slot cavity,proximal approach Air Abrasion Sonoabrasion Smart prep burs ART and ITR Chemomechanical caries removal Use of lasers 4

Introduction 5

Recent Cavity Classification Systems Size 0-4 6

International caries detection and assessment system 7

Definition 8

Factors 9

Principles of Minimal Intervention 1. Control the disease through reduction of cryogenic flora 2. Remineralize early lesions 3. Perform minimal intervention surgical procedures, as required 4. Repair, rather than replace, defective restorations Adopted by the FDI General Assembly, 1st October 2002, Vienna, (FDI Statement, 2002 10

Tunnel cavity preparation 11 Two variations are described: Closed ‘tunnel’ : Which leaves the demineralized approximal enamel intact Open ‘tunnel’ : Which is accessed from occlusal and exits through the approximal surface

Slot cavity prepartion 12

Proximal approach 13

Air abrasion for cavity preparation

Sonic abrasion 16

Controlled removal of caries with a self-limiting polymer bur Polymer caries removal burs. Metal shaft +polymer blades Only diseased dentin removed KHN 50 leaving healthy dentin intact.

Atraumatic restorative technique 20

History 21

History 22 ART was developed by Dr. Jo Frencken DDS, MSc, PhD, a dental researcher in the Netherlands.

Definition 23

Goals 24

Principles of art 2 main principles are 25

Reasons 26

Indications 27

contraindication 28

advantages 29

Procedure 30

Hygiene &infection control Universal precautions In a field situation, 31

Instruments & materials used 32

33

Caries removal Isolate and inspect Excavate caries Remove soft caries Remove unsupported enamel 34 Particular care taken at enamel dentin junction And floor of deep cavities

conditioning 35

Dispensing and mixing 36 Mixing time 20-30seconds Restore using Finger press technique

Failed/defective restorations 37

limitations 38

What not to forget? Treating dental caries using the ART approach without emphasis on preventive measures is a job only half done. Important to explain to people how they can prevent dental caries from affecting other teeth . 1. Removal of plaque 2 . Diet counselling 3 . Application of fluorides 4 . Application of antimicrobial agents 5 . Application of sealants 39

Community field studies with art 40 1991 71% 1993 84% Over 25 countries worldwide

Comparison of art to conventional treatment The survival rate in ART treated surfaces after 6 years was 68.6% compared to 74.5% in conventionally treated surfaces; this difference was not statistically significant. Single surface>multi surface 41 A systematic review by Mickenautsch et al. concludes that ART can be used in both primary and the permanent dentitions

Art in the public services First reported in South Africa Mexico in National oral health programme in 1998. As per data in 2002, 810 dentists trained,2 million restorations placed with 88% success rate. 42

South Africa (Liberian Refugee Camp, 1997-99) 43

Turkey ( Anatolia,Bagivar ) performed in school children, farm worker's children living in tents or children working in cotton fields. 44

Interim therapeutic restoration Newer terminology for ART Developed in 2001. Utilises techniques similar to ART with different therapeutic goals AAPD policy on ITR revision 2017 45

Goal 46

Uses of itr 47

procedure 48

Indian health service ( ihs ) Promotes ITR IHS Early Childhood caries collaborative plan 5 year surveillance and prevention promotion project Lessens food impaction, sensitivity and lesion growth Helps maintain teeth with large lesions until crowns can be placed Fewer pulpal exposures Performed with minimal cooperation 49

conclusion ART is not only a restorative but also a preventive and palliative treatment,   performed not only by dentists but also by other operating dental personnel, such as dental therapists also it can be performed by person without any dental education background if given proper training. Their purpose was to bring health care to rural areas where urban- trained doctors would not settle . This increases the chance for better oral health in underserved communities in both developed and developing countries 50

Chemomechanical caries removal 51

Classified as 52

Gk-101 Introduced in 1976 Solution A- 0.05% N- monochloroglycerine Solution B-4-6% NaOCl Mechanism of Action: Chlorination of denatured collagen by conversion of hydroxyproline to pyrrole-2-carboxyglycine Limitation: Need special equipment for delivery. 53

GK-101e ( caridex ) Introduced in 1984, CM Habib Solution A- 0.05% N-monochloro-DL-2amino butyrate(NMAB) Solution B-4-6% NaOCl Mechanism of Action: Chlorination of denatured collagen+cleavage of denatured collagen fibres . Limitation: Need special equipment for delivery. 54

carisolv Original gel Before 2004 Syringe A : Carboxymethyl cellulose based gel , coloring agent, amino acids( glutamine,leucine,lysine ) Syringe B: 0.25% NaOCl Action is similar to caridex but amino acids react with different moieties of carious lesion. Higher viscosity, easier handling. Caries excavation time: 10.4-12.2 minutes 55

carisolv 56 Modified gel 2004 Multimix syringe Amino acid concentration halved NaOCl increased by 0.475% Caries excavation time:9.0-11.4minutes

New carisolv system 2013 Incorporation of minimally invasive burs( Cera-bur,polymer bur) Special detector dye Shortened caries excavation time Caries excavation time:7.6+/-4.2minutes 57

carisolv 58 Biologically no adverse effects Similar action to calcium hydroxide Promotes repair of pulp No adverse effect on dentin,preserves Ca:P ratio Special instruments to apply

59

Enzyme based: Papacarie Portuguese word ”caries eater” 2003 Papain enzyme extracted from papaya leaf “ Carica papaya” Mechanism of action is unclear Exhibits shorter excavation time than carisolv 60

lasers 61

Caries prevention Reduces the carbonate to phosphorous ratio and leads to the formation of more stable and less acid soluble compounds, reducing susceptibility to acid attack and caries. . pH from 5.5 to 4.8 and the hard tooth structure is four times more resistance to acid dissolution. Flaitz CM et al., that the application of acidulated phosphate fluoride (1.23% gel for 4min) before or after argon laser exposure resulted in a significant reduction in lesion depth when compared with argon laser alone or other methods. Zezell DM et al., showing that treatment with APF solution after irradiation with a Nd:YAG laser caused a remarkable increase in acid resistance of the enamel. 62

Caries Removal Carious material contains a higher water content compared with surrounding healthy dental hard tissues. Consequently , the ablation efficiency of caries is greater than for healthy tissues. In an in-vitro study conducted by Bader C and Krejci investigating the effectiveness of caries removal by Er : YAG laser, it was found that the laser ablated carious dentin effectively with minimal thermal damage to the surrounding intact dentin. 63

Cavity Preparation Utilisation of the Er:YAG laser has been considered an effective instrument for cavity preparation and is able to cut as high-speed turbines, stimulate the secondary dentin and have an antibacterial effect. The radiation with Er:YAG laser may modify the dentin structure removes the smear layer of the dentin and exposes the dentinal tubules, which theoretically makes the surface more favorable to adhesion with the adhesive systems and consequently improving sealing of the restorations. According to Vissuri et al., and Groth et al ., it is able to provide acceptable microretention for adhesive materials, roughening the dentin as the acid-etching. 64

references . Marwah N. Textbook of pediatric dentistry.3 rd edn . Tandon S. Textbook of Pedodontics . 2 nd edn . Paras medical publishers 2009 Peter S. Essentials of Community Dentistry . 4 th edn . Studervant CM, Roberson TM, Heymann HO, Studervant JR. The Art and science of operative dentistry. 3rd ed. Mosby Co: 1995.p. 62-3 Freedman G, Pakroo JS. Polymer preparation persuades patients. Dental Town Magazine 2003;May:22–5 Strassler HE.Aunique approach for the treatment of caries using self-limiting caries removal instruments. Contemp Esthet Rest Pract 2003;7(3):66–8. 65

Thank you 66