Molecular modelling

70,668 views 91 slides Apr 29, 2013
Slide 1
Slide 1 of 91
Slide 1
1
Slide 2
2
Slide 3
3
Slide 4
4
Slide 5
5
Slide 6
6
Slide 7
7
Slide 8
8
Slide 9
9
Slide 10
10
Slide 11
11
Slide 12
12
Slide 13
13
Slide 14
14
Slide 15
15
Slide 16
16
Slide 17
17
Slide 18
18
Slide 19
19
Slide 20
20
Slide 21
21
Slide 22
22
Slide 23
23
Slide 24
24
Slide 25
25
Slide 26
26
Slide 27
27
Slide 28
28
Slide 29
29
Slide 30
30
Slide 31
31
Slide 32
32
Slide 33
33
Slide 34
34
Slide 35
35
Slide 36
36
Slide 37
37
Slide 38
38
Slide 39
39
Slide 40
40
Slide 41
41
Slide 42
42
Slide 43
43
Slide 44
44
Slide 45
45
Slide 46
46
Slide 47
47
Slide 48
48
Slide 49
49
Slide 50
50
Slide 51
51
Slide 52
52
Slide 53
53
Slide 54
54
Slide 55
55
Slide 56
56
Slide 57
57
Slide 58
58
Slide 59
59
Slide 60
60
Slide 61
61
Slide 62
62
Slide 63
63
Slide 64
64
Slide 65
65
Slide 66
66
Slide 67
67
Slide 68
68
Slide 69
69
Slide 70
70
Slide 71
71
Slide 72
72
Slide 73
73
Slide 74
74
Slide 75
75
Slide 76
76
Slide 77
77
Slide 78
78
Slide 79
79
Slide 80
80
Slide 81
81
Slide 82
82
Slide 83
83
Slide 84
84
Slide 85
85
Slide 86
86
Slide 87
87
Slide 88
88
Slide 89
89
Slide 90
90
Slide 91
91

About This Presentation

MM is the excellent strategical tool in the world of computational Chemistry. I tried my best to
compile overall aspects.


Slide Content

Theory of Molecular Modelling Hardik Mistry Pharmaceutical Chemistry L. M. College of Pharmacy

Target Identification &Validation Hit Identification Lead Identification Lead Optimisa - tion CD Prenomi- nation Concept Testing Development for launch Launch Phase FDA Submission Launch Finding Potential Drug Targets Validating Therapeutic Targets Finding Potential Drugs Drug<>Target<>Therapeutic Effect Association Finalized Testing in Man (toxicity and efficacy) Drug Discovery is a goal of research . Methods and approaches from different science areas can be applied to achieve the goal. The Drug Discovery pipeline 2

Hugo Kubinyi , www.kubinyi.de 3

R&D cost per new drug is $500 to $700 millions To sustain growth, each of top 20 pharma company should produce more new drugs Currently, total industry produces only 32 new drugs per year. Current rate of NDAs far below than required for sustained growth. The Drug Discovery : Current Status 4

Atomistic Continuum Finite Periodic Quantum Mechanical Methodies Classical Methods Semi-Empirical Ab Initio Deterministic Stochastic QM/MM Quantum MC DFT Molecular Dynamics Monte Carlo Hartree Fock Computational Tools 5 Theoretical hierarchy

Model vs Scale > 10 -4 m 10 -6 m 10 -8 m 10 -10 m Macroscale Microscale Nanoscale Atomic Scale Classical Mechanics Organism Cell Protein, membrane Small molecules, drug Continuum Mechanics • Finite Element Method • Fluid Dynamics Statistical Mechanics • Molecular Mechanics • Molecular Dynamics • Brownian Dynamics • Stochastic Dynamics Quantum Mechanics •Density Functional Theory • Hartree-Fock Theory • Perturbation Theory • Structural Mechanics 6

Receptor Ligand U n k n o w n K n o w n Unknown Known Generate 3D structures, HTS, Comb. Chem Build the lock and then find the key Molecular Docking Drug receptor interaction 2D/3D QSAR and Pharmacophore Infer the lock by expecting key De NOVO Design , Virtual screening Build or find the key that fits the lock Receptor based drug design Rational drug design Indirect drug design Homology modelling Basic Modeling Strategies 7

Molecular modelling allow scientists to use computers to visualize molecules means representing molecular structures numerically and simulating their behavior with the equations of quantum and classical physics , to discover new lead compounds for drugs or to refine existing drugs in silico. Goal : To develop a sufficient accurate model of the system so that physical experiment may not be necessary . Definition 8

The term “ Molecular modeling “expanded over the last decades from a tool to visualize three-dimensional structures and to simulate , predict and analyze the properties and the behavior of the molecules on an atomic level to data mining and platform to organize many compounds and their properties into database and to perform virtual drug screening via 3D database screening for novel drug compounds . 9

Molecular modeling starts from structure determination Selection of calculation methods in computational chemistry Starting geometry from standard geometry, x-ray, etc. Molecule Molecular mechanics Quantum mechanics Molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo Is bond formation or breaking important? Are many force field parameters missing ? Is it smaller than 100 atoms? Are charges of interest ? Are there many closely spaced conformers? Is plenty of computer time available? Is the free energy Needed ? Is solvation Important ? 10

Sticks 11 Ball and Stick Space Filling (CPK) Wire Frame M o l e c u l a r G r a p h i c s

Molecular modelling or more generally computational chemistry is the scientific field of simulation of molecular systems. Basically in the computational chemistry , the free energy of the system can be used to assess many interesting aspects of the system. In the drug design , the free energy may be used to assess whether a modification to a drug increase or decrease target binding. The energy of the system is a function of the type and number of atoms and their positions . Molecular modelling softwares are designed to calculate this efficiently. Computational Chemistry approaches 12

The energy of the molecules play important role in the computational chemistry. If an algorithm can estimate the energy of the system, then many important properties may be derived from it. On today's computer , however energy calculation takes days or months even for simple system. So in practice, various approximations must be introduced that reduce the calculations time while adding acceptably small effect on the result. Molecular behavior : Computing energy 13

Example : Familiar conformation of the Butane 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 0.3 0.25 0.2 0.15 0.10 0.1 0.05 C B D E F Potential energy Dihedral angle Probability Need of molecular Modelling ????? 14

Quantum mechanics Molecular mechanics Ab initio methods DFT method Semiimpirical methods Molecular Modelling 15

Quantum mechanics is basically the molecular orbital calculation and offers the most detailed description of a molecule’s chemical behavior. HOMO – highest energy occupied molecular orbital LUMO – lowest energy unoccupied molecular orbital Quantum methods utilize the principles of particle physics to examine structure as a function of electron distribution. Geometries and properties for transition state and excited state can only be calculated with Quantum mechanics . Their use can be extended to the analysis of molecules as yet unsynthesized and chemical species which are difficult (or impossible) to isolate. Quantum Mechanics 16

Quantum mechanics is based on Schrödinger equation H Ψ = E Ψ = (U + K ) Ψ E = energy of the system relative to one in which all atomic particles are separated to infinite distances H = Hamiltonian for the system . It is an “operator” ,a mathematical construct that operates on the molecular orbital , Ψ ,to determine the energy. U = potential energy K = kinetic energy Ψ = wave function describes the electron distribution around the molecule. 17

The Hamiltonian operator H is, in general, Where Vi 2 is the Laplacian operator acting on particle i . Particles are both electrons and nuclei. The symbols mi and qi are the mass and charge of particle I, and rij is the distance between particles. The first term gives the kinetic energy of the particle within a wave formulation. The second term is the energy due to Coulombic attraction or repulsion of particles . 18

In currently available software, the Hamiltonian above is nearly never used. The problem can be simplified by separating the nuclear and electron motions. kinetic energy of electrons Attraction of electrons to nuclei Repulsion between electrons Born-Oppenheimer approximation 19

Thus, each electronic structure calculation is performed for a fixed nuclear configuration, and therefore the positions of all atoms must be specified in an input file. The ab initio program like MOLPRO then computes the electronic energy by solving the electronic Schrödinger equation for this fixed nuclear configuration. The electronic energy as function of the 3N-6 internal nuclear degrees of freedom defines the potential energy surface (PES) which is in general very complicated and can have many minima and saddle points. The minima correspond to equilibrium structures of different isomers or molecules, and saddle points to transition states between them. 20

The term ab initio is Latin for “from the beginning” premises of quantum theory. This is an approximate quantum mechanical calculation for a function or finding an approximate solution to a differential equation. In its purest form, quantum theory uses well known physical constants such as the velocity of light , values for the masses and charges of nuclear particles and differential equations to directly calculate molecular properties and geometries. This formalism is referred to as ab initio (from first principles) quantum mechanics. Ab initio methods 21

HARTREE±FOCK APPROXIMATION The most common type of ab initio calculation in which the primary approximation is the central field approximation means Coulombic electron-electron repulsion is taken into account by integratinfg the repulsion term. This is a variational calculation, meaning that the approximate energies calculated are all equal to or greater than the exact energy. The energies are calculated in units called Hartrees (1 Hartree . 27.2116 eV ) 22

The steps in a Hartreefock calculation start with an initial guess for the orbital coefficients ,usually using a semiempirical method. This function is used to calculate an energy and a new set of orbital coefficients, which can then be used to obtain a new set ,and so on. This procedure continues iteratively untill the energies and orbital coefficient remains constant from one iteration to the next. This iterative procedure is called as a Self-consistent field procedure (SCF). 23

Advantage Advantages of this method is that it breaks the many-electron Schrodinger equation into many simpler one-electron equations. Each one electron equation is solved to yield a single-electron wave function, called an orbital, and an energy, called an orbital energy. 24

Method Advantages Disadvantages Best for Ab initio Useful for a broad range of systems Computationally expensive Small systems Mathematically rigorous :no empirical parameters Does not depend on experimental data Electronic transitions System Without experimental data Calculates transition states and excited states System requiring high accuracy Ab initio methods 25

What is Density ? How something(s) is(are) distributed/spread about a given space Electron density tells us where the electrons are likely to exist. Allyl Cation : Density functional Theory 26

A function depends on a set of variables. y = f ( x ) E.g., wave function depend on electron coordinates. What is a Functional? A functional depends on a functions, which in turn depends on a set of variables. E = F [ f ( x ) ] E.g ., energy depends on the wave function, which depends on electron coordinates. 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 F(X)=Y 27

The electron density is the square of wave function and integrated over electron coordinates. The complexity of a wave function increases as the number of electrons grows up, but the electron density still depends only on 3 coordinates. x x y r Density functional Theory With this theory, the properties of a many-electron system can be determined by using functionals , i.e. functions of another function, which in this case is the spatially dependent electron density . 28

There are difficulties in using density functional theory to properly describe intermolecular interactions, especially van der Waals forces (dispersion); charge transfer excitations; transition states, global potential energy surfaces and some other strongly correlated systems . 29

Density functional theory has its conceptual roots in the Thomas-Fermi model . It is developed by Thomas and Fermi in 1927. They used a statistical model to approximate the distribution of electrons in an atom. The mathematical basis postulated that electrons are distributed uniformly in phase space with two electrons in every h 3 of volume. For each element of coordinate space volume d 3 r we can fill out a sphere of momentum space up to the Fermi momentum p f . Thomas Fermi model 30

Equating the number of electrons in coordinate space to that in phase space gives Solving for p f and substituting into the classical kinetic energy formula then leads directly to a kinetic energy represented as a functional of the electron density: where 31

As such, they were able to calculate the energy of an atom using this kinetic energy functional combined with the classical expressions for the nuclear-electron and electron-electron interactions (which can both also be represented in terms of the electron density). The Thomas-Fermi equation's accuracy is limited because the resulting kinetic energy functional is only approximate, and because the method does not attempt to represent the exchange energy of an atom as a conclusion of the Pauli principle. An exchange energy functional was added by Dirac in 1928 called as the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac model However, the Thomas-Fermi-Dirac theory remained rather inaccurate for most applications. The largest source of error was in the representation of the kinetic energy, followed by the errors in the exchange energy, and due to the complete neglect of electron correlation. 32

DFT was originated with a theorem by Hoenburg and Kohn . The original H-K theorems held only for non-degenerate ground states in the absence of a magnetic field . The first H-K theorem demonstrates that the ground state properties of a many-electron system are uniquely determined by an electron density that depends on only 3 spatial coordinates. It lays the groundwork for reducing the many-body problem of N electrons with 3N spatial coordinates to only 3 spatial coordinates, through the use of functionals of the electron density. Hohenberg -Kohn theorems 33

This theorem can be extended to the time-dependent domain to develop time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT), which can be used to describe excited states. The second H-K theorem defines an energy functional for the system and proves that the correct ground state electron density minimizes this energy functional. 34

Within the framework of Kohn-Sham DFT, the intractable many-body problem of interacting electrons in a static external potential is reduced to a tractable problem of non-interacting electrons moving in an effective potential. The effective potential includes the external potential and the effects of the Coulomb interactions between the electrons, e.g., the exchange and correlation interactions. kohn -Sham theory E DFT [ r ] = T [ r ] + E ne [ r ] + J [ r ] + E xc [ r ] Electronic Kinetic energy Nuclei-electrons Coulombic energy electrons-electrons Coulombic energy electrons-electrons Exchange energy 35

Modeling the latter two interactions becomes the difficulty within KS DFT. In this formulation, the electron density is expressed as a linear combination of basis functions similar in mathematical form to HF orbitals . A determinant is then formed from these functions, called Kohn±Sham orbitals . It is the electron density from this determinant of orbitals that is used to compute the energy. 36

Semiempirical molecular orbital methods So Semiempirical methods are very fast, applicable to large molecules, and may give qualitative accurate results when applied to molecules that are similar to the molecules used for parameterization. Because Semiempirical quantum chemistry avoid two limitations, namely slow speed and low accuracy, of the Hartree-Fock calculation by omitting or parameterzing certain integrals based on experimental data, such as ionization energies of atoms, or dipole moments of molecules. Rather than performing a full analysis on all electrons within the molecule, some electron interactions are ignored . 37

Modern semiempirical models are based on the Neglect of Diatomic Differential Overlap (NDDO) method in which the overlap matrix S is replaced by the unit matrix. This allows one to replace the Hartree-Fock secular equation |H-ES| = 0 with a simpler equation |H-E|=0. Existing semiempirical models differ by the further approximations that are made when evaluating one-and two-electron integrals and by the parameterization philosophy. 38

Modified Neglect of Diatomic Overlap , MNDO ( by Michael Dewar and Walter Thiel , 1977) Austin Model 1, AM1 (by Dewar and co-workers) Parametric Method 3, PM3 (by James Stewart) PDDG/PM3 (by William Jorgensen and co-workers) 39

Modified Neglect of Diatomic Overlap , by Michael Dewar and Walter Thiel , 1977 It is the oldest NDDO-based model that parameterizes one-center two-electron integrals based on spectroscopic data for isolated atoms, and evaluates other two-electron integrals using the idea of multipole-multipole interactions from classical electrostatics. A classical MNDO model uses only s and p orbital basis sets while more recent MNDO/d adds d- orbitals that are especially important for the description of hypervalent sulphur species and transition metals. MNDO 40

Deficiencies Inability to describe the hydrogen bond due to a strong intermolecular repulsion. The MNDO method is characterized by a generally poor reliability in predicting heats of formation. For example: highly substituted stereoisomers are predicted to be too unstable compared to linear isomers due to overestimation of repulsion is sterically crowded systems. 41

By Michel Dewar and co-workers Takes a similar approach to MNDO in approximating two-electron integrals but uses a modified expression for nuclear-nuclear core repulsion. The modified expression results in non-physical attractive forces that mimic van der Waals interactions. AM1 predicts the heat of the energy more accurately than the MNDO. The results of AM1 calculations often are used as the starting points for parameterizations of the force fields in molecular dynamic simulation and CoMFA QSAR. 42 Austin Model 1 , AM1

Some known limitations to AM1 energies Predicting rotational barriers to be one-third the actual barrier and predicting five- membered rings to be too stable. The predicted heat of formation tends to be inaccurate for molecules with a large amount of charge localization. Geometries involving phosphorus are predicted poorly. There are systematic errors in alkyl group energies predicting them to be too stable. Nitro groups are too positive in energy. The peroxide bond is too short by about 0.17 A . Hydrogen bonds are predicted to have the correct strength, but often the wrong orientation. So o n average, AM1 predicts energies and geometries better than MNDO, but not as well as PM3 . 43

By James Stewart Uses a Hamiltonian that uses nearly the same equations as the AM1 method along with an improved set of parametersis . Limitations of PM3.. PM3 tends to predict that the barrier to rotation around the C-N bond in peptides is too low. Bonds between Si and the halide atoms are too short Proton affinities are not accurate. Some polycyclic rings are not flat. The predicted charge on nitrogen is incorrect. Nonbonded distances are too short.. 44 Parametric Methods 3 , PM3

Strength Overall heats of formation are more accurate than with MNDO or AM1. Hypervalent molecules are also predicted more accurately PM3 also tends to predict incorrect electronic states for germanium compounds It tends to predict sp3 nitrogen as always being pyramidal. Hydrogen bonds are too short by about 0.1AÊ , but the orientation is usually correct . On average, PM3 predicts energies and bond lengths more accurately than AM1 or MNDO 45

By William Jorgensen and co-workers The Pairwize Distance Directed Gaussian (PDDG) Use a functional group-specific modification of the core repulsion function. Its modification provides good description of the van der Waals attraction between atoms . PDDG/PM3 model very accurate for estimation of heats of formation because of reparameterization . But some limitations common to NDDO methods remain in the PDDG/PM3 model: the conformational energies are unreliable, most activation barriers are significantly overestimated, and description of radicals is erratic. So far, only C, N, O, H, S, P, Si, and halogens have been parameterized for PDDG/PM3 46 PDDG/ PM3

Some freely available computational chemistry programs that include many semiempirical models are MOPAC 6 , MOPAC 7 , and WinMopac . 47

Computational modeling of structure-activity relationships Design of chemical synthesis or process scale-up Development and testing of new methodologies and algorithms Checking for gross errors in experimental thermochemical data e.g. heat of formation Preliminary optimization of geomteries of unusual molecules and transition states that cannot be optimized with molecular mechanics methods Usefulness 48

Method Advantages Disadvantages Best for Semi empirical Less demanding computationally than ab initio methods Requires ab initio or experimental data for parameters. Medium-sized systems (hundreds of atoms) Use quantum physics Uses experimental parameters Uses extensive approximations Calculates transition states and excited states. Less rigorous than ab initio methods. Electronic transitions System Semi empirical methods 49

The Process of finding the minimum of an empirical potential energy function is called as the Molecular mechanics. (MM) The process produce a molecule of idealized geometry. Molecular mechanics is a mathematical formalism which attempts to reproduce molecular geometries, energies and other features by adjusting bond lengths, bond angles and torsion angles to equilibrium values that are dependent on the hybridization of an atom and its bonding scheme. Molecular mechanics 50

Molecular mechanics breaks down pair wise interaction into √ Bonded interaction ( internal coordination ) - Atoms that are connected via one to three bonds √ Non bonded interaction . - Electrostatic and Van der waals component The general form of the force field equation is E P (X) = E bonded + E nonbonded 51

Bonded interactions Used to better approximate the interaction of the adjacent atoms. Calculations in the molecular mechanics is similar to the Newtonians law of classical mechanics and it will calculate geometry as a function of steric energy Hooke’s law is applied here f = kx f = force on the spring needed to stretch an ideal spring is proportional to its elongation x ,and where k is the force constant or spring constant of the spring. 52

E bonded = E bond + E angle + E dihedral Bond term E bond = ½ k b (b – b o ) 2 Angle term E Angle = ½ k θ ( θ – θ ) Energy of the dihedral angles E dihedral = ½ k Φ (1 – cos (n Φ + δ ) 53

H C C H H Graphical representation of the bonded and non bonded interaction and the corresponding energy terms . E coulomb Electrostatic attraction E vdw Van der waals Y ij θ K θ K b K Ф E Ф Ф E θ E b b b Bond stretching Dihedral rotation Angle bending 54

Nearly applied to all pairs of atoms The nonbonded interaction terms usually include electrostatic interactions and van der waals interaction , which are expressed as coloumbic interaction as well as Lennard -Jones type potentials, respectively. All of them are a function of the distance between atom pairs , r ij . 55 Non bonded interaction

E Nonbonded = E van der waals + E electrostatic E van der waals E electrostatic 56 Lennard Jones potential Coulomb's Law

The molecular mechanics energy expression consists of a simple algebraic equation for the energy of the compound. A set of the equations with their associated constants which are the energy expression is called a force field . Such equations describes the various aspects of the equation like stretching, bending, torsions, electronic interactions van der waals forces and hydrogen bonding. Force Field 57

Valance term . Terms in the energy expression which describes a single aspects of the molecular shape. Eg ., such as bond stretching , angle bending , ring inversion or torsional motions. Cross term. Terms in the energy expression which describes how one motion of the molecule affect the motion of the another. Eg ., Stretch-bend term which describes how equilibrium bond length tend to shift as bond angles are changed. Electrostatic term. force field may or may not include this term. Eg ., Coulomb’s law. 58

Some force fields simplify the complexity of the calculations by omitting most of the hydrogen atoms. The parameters describing the each backbone atom are then modified to describe the behavior of the atoms with the attached hydrogens. Thus the calculations uses a CH 2 group rather than a Sp 3 carbon bonded to two hydrogens. These are called united atom force field or intrinsic hydrogen methods. Some popular force fields are AMBER CHARMM CFF 59

AMBER Assisted model building with energy refinement is the name of both a force field and a molecular mechanics program. It was parameterized specifically for the protein and nucleic acids. It uses only five bonding and nonbonding terms and no any cross term. 60 amber.scripps.edu

CHARMM (Harvard University)‏ Chemistry at Harvard macromolecular mechanics is the name of both a force field and program incorporating the force field. It was originally devised for the proteins and nucleic acids. But now it is applied to the range of the bimolecules , molecular dynamics, solvation , crystal packing , vibrational analysis and QM/MM studies. It uses the five valance terms and one of them is an electrostatic term. 61 www.charmm.org

The consistent force field . It was developed to yield consistent accuracy of results for conformations , vibrational spectras , strain energy and vibrational enthalpy of proteins. There are several variations on this CVFF – consistent valence forcefield UBCFF – Urefi Bradley consistent forcefield LCFF – Lynghy consistent forcefield These forcefields use five to six valance terms . One of which is electrostatic and four to six others are Cross terms. CFF 62

Molecular mechanics energy minimization means to finds stable, low energy conformations by changing the geometry of a structure or identifying a point in the configuration space at which the net force on atom vanishes . In other words , it is to find the coordinates where the first derivative of the potential energy function equals zero. Such a conformation represents one of the many different conformations that a molecule might assume at a temperature of 0 k . Molecular Mechanics Energy Minimization 63

The potential energy function is evaluated by a certain algorithm or minimizer that moves the atoms in the molecule to a nearest local minimum Examples ; Steepest Decent Conjugate Gradient Newton- Raphson procedure 64

There are three main approaches to finding a minimum of a function of many variables. infalliable ! Search Methods : Utilize only values of function Slow and inefficient Search algorithms infalliable and always find minimum Example :SIMPLEX ! Gradient Methods : Utilizes values of a function and its gradients. Currently most popular Example : The conjugated gradient algorithm ! Newton Methods : Require value of function and its 1 st and 2 nd derivatives. Hessian matrix Example : BFGS algorithm 65

Geometry optimization is an iterative procedure of computing the energy of a structure and then making incremental increase changes to reduce the energy. Minimization involves two steps 1 – an equation describes the energy of the system as a function of its coordinates must be defined and evaluated for a given conformation 2 – the conformation is adjusted to lower the value of the potential function . 66

V L G X L X X (1) X (2) X (min) L = Local minimum G = Global minimum Local and global minima for a function of one variable and an example of a sequence of solution. Algorithm for decent series minimization. 67

! In Cartesian presentation of potential energy surface , the picture would like the lots of narrow tortuous valleys of similar depth. → This is because low energy paths for individual atoms are very narrow due to the presence of hard bond stretching and angle bending terms. → The low energy paths corresponds only to the rotation of groups or large portions of the molecule as a result of varying torsional angles. In the Cartesian space the minimizer walks along the bottom of a narrow winding channel which is frequently a dead-end . Cartesian space 68

In internal coordinates presentation , the potential energy surface looks like a valley surrounded by high mountains. → The high peaks corresponds to stretching and bending terms and close Vander Waals contacts while the bottom of the valley represents the torsional degree of freedom. → If you happen to start at the mountain tops in the internal coordinates space , the minimizer sees the bottom of the valley clearly from the above . Internal coordinates 69

Using the internal coordinates there is a clear separation of variables into the hard ones ( those whose small changes produces large changes in the function values ) and soft ones ( those whose changes do not affect the function value substantially). During the function optimization in the internal coordinates, the minimizer first minimizes the hard variables and in the subsequent iterations cleans up the details by optimizing the soft variables. While in the Cartesian spaces all variables are of the same type. 70

The atoms and molecules are in the constant motion and especially in the case of biological macromolecules , these movement are concerted and may be essential for biological function. And so such thermodynamic properties cannot be derived from the harmonic approximations and molecular mechanics because they inherently assumes the simulation methods around a systemic minimum. So we use molecular Dynamic simulations. Molecular dynamics 71

Used to compute the dynamics of the molecular system, including time-averaged structural and energetic properties, structural fluctuations and conformational transitions. The dynamics of a system may be simplified as the movements of each of its atoms. if the velocities and the forces acting on atoms can be quantified, then their movement may be simulated. 72

There are two approaches in molecular dynamics for the simulations . Stochastic ! Called Monte Carlo simulation ! Based on exploring the energy surface by randomly probing the geometry of the molecular system. Deterministic ! Called Molecular dynamics ! It actually simulates the time evolution of the molecular system and provides us with the actual trajectory of the system 73

Based on exploring the energy surface by randomly probing the geometry of the molecular system. Steps 1 - Specify the initial coordinates of atoms 2 - Generate new coordinates by changing the initial coordinates at random. 3 - Compute the transition probability W(0,a) 4 - Generate a uniform random number R in the range [0,1] 5 - If W(0,a) < R then take the old coordinates as the new coordinates and go to step 2 6 – Otherwise accept the new coordinates and go to step 2. Stochastic approach Monte Carlo Simulation 74

The most popular of the Monte Carlo method for the molecular system See the pamplet for description 75

Deterministic approach Molecular Dynamic Simulation Actually time evaluation of the molecular system and the information generated from simulation methods can be used to fully characterized the thermodynamic state of the system. Here the molecular system is studied as the series of the snapshots taken at the close time intervals. ( femtoseconds usually) . 76

Based on the potential energy function we can find components F i of the force F acting on atom as F i = - dV / dx i This force in an acceleration according to Newton’s equation of motion F = m a By knowing the acceleration we can calculate the velocity of an atom in the next time step. From atom position , velocities and acceleration at any moment in time, we can calculate atom positions and velocities at the next time step. And so integrating these infiniteimal steps yields the trajectories of the system for any desired time range. Principle 77

Verlet algorithm The Verlet algorithm uses positions and accelerations at time t and the positions from time t- δt to calculate new positions at time t+δt . r(t+ δ t) = 2r(t) - r(t- δ t)+a(t) δ t 2 78

Advantages : – Position integration is accurate (errors on order of Δ t4). – Single force evaluation per time step. – The forward/backward expansion guarantees that the path is reversible. Disadvantages : – Velocity has large errors (order of Δt2). – It is hard to scale the temperature (kinetic energy of molecule). 79

1. the velocities are first calculated at time t+1/2δt (the velocities leapover the positions) 2. these are used to calculate the positions, r, at time t+δt . (then the positions leapover the velocities) Leapfrog algorithm r(t+ δ t) = r(t) + v( t + ½ δ t) δ t v( t + ½ δ t) = v( t - ½ δ t) +a(t) δ t 80

Advantages : – High quality velocity calculation, which is important in temperature control. Disadvantages : – Velocities are known accurately at half time steps away from when the position is known accurately. – Estimate of velocity at integral time step: v(t) = [v(t- Δ t)+v(t+ Δ t)]/2 81

We need an initial set of atom positions (geometry) and atom velocities. The initial positions of atoms are most often accepted from the prior geometry optimization with molecular mechanics. Formally such positions corresponds to the absolute zero temperature. Procedure 82

2) The velocities are assigned to each atom from the Maxwell distribution for the temperature 20 o K . Random assignment does not allocate correct velocities and the system is not at thermodynamic equilibrium. To approach the equilibrium the “equilibration” run is performed and the total kinetic energy of the system is monitored until it is constant. The velocities are then rescaled to correspond to some higher temperature. i.e heating is performed. Then the next equilibration run follows. 83

The absolute temperature T, and atom velocities are related through the mean kinetic energy of the system. N = number of the atoms in the system m = mass of the i-th atom k = Boltzman constant. And by multiplying the velocities by we can effectively “heat “ the system and that accelerate the atoms of the molecular system. These cycles are repeated until the desired temperature is achieved and at this point a “production’ run can commence. 84

Molecular dynamics for larger molecules or systems in which solvent molecules are explicitly taken into account is a computationally intensive task even for supercomputers. For such a conditions we have two approximations Periodic boundary conditions Stochastic boundary conditions 85

Periodic boundary conditions Here we are actually simulating a crystal comprised of boxes with ideally correlated atom movements. 86

Stochastic boundary conditions Reaction zone : Portion of the system which we want to study Reservoir zone Portion of the system which Is inert and uninteresting 87

Method Advantages Disadvantages Best for Molecular Mechanics Computationally cheap ,fast and useful with limited computer resources Does not calculate electronic properties Large systems (Thousands of atoms) Use Classical physics Relies on force field with embeded empirical parameters Can be used for large molecules like enzymes Requires ab initio or experimental data for parameters Systems or processes that do not involve bond breaking Commercial software applicable to a limited range of molecules Molecular Mechanics 88

So molecular dynamics and molecular mechanics are often used together to achieve the target conformer with lowest energy configuration Visualise the 3D shape of a molecule • Carry out a complete analysis of all possible conformations and their relative energies • Obtain a detailed electronic structure and the polarisibility with take account of solvent molecules. • Predict the binding energy for docking a small molecule i.e. a drug candidate, with a receptor or enzyme target. • Producing B lock busting drug • Nevertheless, molecular modelling, if used with caution, can provide very useful information to the chemist and biologist involved in medicinal research. Conclusion 89

References 1) Cohen N. C. “Guide book on Molecular Modelling on Drug Design” Academic press limited publication, London, 1996. 2) Young D. C. “Computational Chemistry: A Practical Guide for Applying Techniques to Real-World Problems”. John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001. 3) Abraham D. J. “Burger’s Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Discovery ” sixth edition , A John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Publication,1998. 90

THANK YOU 91