History of MG Several students of medical history affirm that Willis, in 1672, gave an account of a disease that could be none other than myasthenia gravis. Others give credit to Wilks (1877) for the first description and for having noted that the medulla was free of disease, in distinction to other types of bulbar paralysis. The first reasonably complete accounts were those of Erb (1878), who characterized the disease as a bulbar palsy without an anatomic lesion, and of Goldflam (1893); for many years thereafter, the disorder was referred to as the Erb-Goldflam syndrome. Jolly (1895) was the first to use the name myasthenia gravis, to which he added the term pseudoparalytica to indicate the lack of structural changes at autopsy. Also it was Jolly who demonstrated that myasthenic weakness could be reproduced in affected patients by repeated faradic stimulation of the relevant motor nerve and that the “fatigued” muscle would still respond to direct galvanic stimulation of its membrane. Interestingly, he suggested the use of physostigmine as a form of treatment, but there the matter rested until Reman, in 1932, and Walker, in 1934, demonstrated the therapeutic value of the drug. Campbell and Bramwell (1900) and Oppenheim (1901) each analyzed over 60 cases and crystallized the clinical concept of the disease. The relationship between myasthenia gravis and tumors of the thymus gland was first noted by Laquer and Weigert in 1901, and in 1949 Castleman and Norris gave the first detailed account of the pathologic changes in the gland. In 1905 Buzzard published a careful clinicopathologic analysis of the disease, commenting on both the thymic abnormalities and the infiltrations of lymphocytes (called lymphorrhages ) in muscle. He postulated that an “ autotoxic agent” caused the muscle weakness, the lymphorrhages , and the thymic lesions. He also commented on the close relation of myasthenia gravis to Graves disease and Addison disease, which are all now considered to have an autoimmune basis. In 1960, Simpson and, independently, Nastuk and coworkers theorized that an autoimmune mechanism must be operative in myasthenia gravis. Finally, in 1973 and subsequently, the autoimmune nature of myasthenia gravis was established through a series of investigations by Patrick and Lindstrom, Fambrough , Lennon, and A. G. Engel and their colleagues (see further on, under “Etiology and Pathogenesis”). These and other references to the early historical features of the disease are to be found in the reviews by Viets and by Kakulas and Adams; A. G. Engel’s monograph (1999) is an excellent modern reference .